Fact is in United nations, there was no new country Malaysia ever registered but a change of name from the federation of Malaya to federation of Malaysia after incorporating Sabah and Sarawak into territories of Federation of Malaya using "questionable" Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) as Sabah and Sarawak were colonies of Britain during signing the MA63 thus making the MA63 an invalid document?
And since Singapore was one of the signatories of MA63 with Singapore quitting federation of Malaysia in 1969 the MA63 was instantly null and void?
By right new agreement should be prepared and signed when Singapore left federation of Malaysia but it was never done making federation of Malaysia illegal??
It is unfortunate Court dismissed MA63 case on the ground federal Constitution amendment needed to allow such case in court ignoring the fact MA63 must first in existence before a change of name from federation of Malaya to federation of Malaysia?
Federal Constitution is in fact the old book of federation of Malaya adopted by the ruling parties as federation of Malaysia Constitution it has nothing to do with MA63?
Would Sarawak people like the court case to be appealed knowing very well high cost is inevitable and would Sarawak people willing to donate to pay for the appeal to "protect" Sarawak rights?
Sarawak people dilemma.
No comments:
Post a Comment