Pages

Powered By Blogger

Tuesday 27 June 2023

有种的就跟新加坡比去

砂政盟的人最喜欢把砂拉越跟马来亚联邦11州和沙巴做比较,在马联邦突围而出感到沾沾自喜。 比得过新加坡才吹,那才有意思。

以砂拉越的身价,一天据报道可生产850,000。我认为不只这数据。咱们超优质的天然气还没算呢。咱们砂还有优质的木材,树胶和各种优质农产品像可可,胡椒,油棕等等。

说拉让海港货运和贸易2022高达900多万令吉,10年来最好的一次。

为什么砂民间要求改善ma水沟

砂拉越的各种税收像印花税,销售税,个人和公司所得税,进出口税,旅游税,陆路交通税等等等等,为什么都归马联邦全拿?

砂2022年收入120亿令吉,而不是2000-3000亿令吉,是没有什么好吹的!

砂宪报都未公布砂拉越独立。怎么今年2023年突然庆祝砂独立60周年,多少砂人看傻眼了。真的是莫名其妙。

Sunday 25 June 2023

Sabah Water Department scandal

Home / Sabah News

Sabah Water Department scandal: Money, money, money everywhere!

Published on: Friday, June 23, 2023. By: Cynthia D Baga

Sabah Water Department scandal: Money, money, money everywhere!

What MACC officers found in Water Department office.

KOTA KINABALU: MACC officer told the Corruption Court hearing Sabah’s biggest scandal involving RM130 million that it was a shock to see so much money all over the place at the office, homes and cars of former State Water Department (JANS) Director Ag Mohd Tahir Mohd Talib.

Describing it as “extraordinary,” Hishammudin Mohammed Esa said his team had first raided the JANS office in Wisma Muis on Oct. 4, 2016 and Ag Tahir was in.

“When arriving at his office, I introduced myself and showed my authority card to Ag Tahir. I informed the purpose of our coming to the office is to complete the search and asked him to cooperate and obey all instructions. 

“I also informed him that any action to prevent, conceal or destroy any document is an offence punishable under section 48 of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) 2009.

“I asked Ag Tahir to surrender all related documents and account books belonging to him, wife and children but he told me all the documents were at home. I instructed my team to start the search.

“At about 10.15am, one Tn Mohd Fadlan (one of the team) found some money inside a bag with label ‘Tahir’ and Mohd Fadlan showed it to me. I then asked Ag Tahir to take out the money and give it to us.

“After that, I instructed Mohd Fadlan and one Pn Ekasuziena to count the money while being observed by Ag Tahir and the total was RM62,500.

“At the same time I instructed Ekasuziena to prepare a list of movable property confiscation for the recovery of the money under Ag Tahir. 

“After that, I instructed Ag Tahir to open the door behind his table. At first, he refused and I repeated him to do so. 

“Ag Tahir then tried but failed and claimed he was not sure where the key of the door was. After trying all the keys, the door managed to be opened.

“Once the door opened, I asked Ag Tahir to show us where he kept the money. He then showed and opened the wide piece of cloth that covered the sofa in the room.

Under the cloth, were arranged a pile of RM100 and RM50 notes that filled the seat of the sofa.

“When I opened the cabinet in the room, it was full with money arranged and tied in the form of a bundle.

“After searching the room, we found almost all the bags in the pantry filled with money tied in bundles. Due to a lot of money, I asked for support team to help take pictures, counting money and seizure.

“At the same time, I instructed Ag Tahir to not allow any individual to enter his office other than MACC officers,” said Hishamuddin who was the raiding officer of the case.

Hishamuddin was reading his witness statement before Sessions Court Judge Abu Bakar Manat, in the trial of Ag Tahir, 58, Fauziah Piut, 55, and Lim Lam Beng, 66, on 37 counts of money laundering involving cash and bank savings amounting to RM61.57 million, as well as unlawful possession of luxury goods.

The team also seized 282 Singapore dollars, 46,200 Thai bath, nine handphones, three Ipads and a bag as well as four bank cards from Ag Tahir.

When the money transfer and arrangement process was made, Ag Tahir was there to observe and instructed all the MACC officers involved to not go out from the room without his permission.

On the same day, he received instructions that the process of confiscating the money at Ag Tahir’s office be expedited because the team needs to execute another search warrant at Ag Tahir’s house in Graceville Townhouse in Sembulan.

“However, I informed my superior the process cannot be done in a rush because it involved a lot of money.

“At that time, counting the money could not be done in Ag Tahir’s office because the space was not enough and uncomfortable, the money was not well organized, scattered and partially filled with dust. Some of the money has been too long and stuck and the rubber band has rotted and broken.

“Due to the reasons, I discussed with Ag Tahir and he agreed to do the process to arrange the money at MACC’s office.

“My team tied the money in bundles in front of Ag Tahir, put in six boxes and each box was sealed with MACC tape.

All the exhibits were brought to Sabah MACC’s office by six officers and later on the exhibits were kept inside a locked room,” said Hishamuddin who was Chief Senior Assistant Commissioner Public Integrity Management Division of MACC Putrajaya.

He further testified that at about 2.10pm the same day, they made a second raid at Ag Tahir’s house in Sembulan.

“When we arrived, there were two vehicles – a Mercedes CGI 250 and BMW 535 – parked at the house and his wife Fauziah was also there.

“We started the search from the third floor of the house and Ag Tahir told us where he kept the valuable things, money and account books as well as share certificates that he owned. All the things were kept inside safe boxes at a room on the third floor.

“There were three safe boxes inside Ag Tahir’s bedroom and I instructed him to open all. He told me he did not know the combination numbers and asked his wife to open it but only two safe boxes could be opened.
“We recovered money and jewellery as well as branded watches inside the two safe boxes.

“There was also money inside envelopes, 93 units of branded handbags, bank statements, bank accounts, various branded watches as well as foreign currency. All the exhibits we brought to the ground floor of the house.

“I asked another support team to process due to the recovery of a lot of money and other valuable things.

“After that we continued the search to the other two bedrooms at the second floor belonging to his son and daughter. We did not find any valuable or suspicious items inside the two rooms.

“Throughout the exhibit collection process, I asked Ag Tahir and his wife to observe the compilation process.

“We then continued the search in vehicles and we found some cash money inside the bonnet of two vehicles. The money that found inside the cars were separated with the money found from the house.

“My team also confiscated three handphones and two laptops from Fauziah,” said Hishamuddin.

According to Hishamuddin, the counting process of the money could not be done at Ag Tahir’s house due to the space, amount of money, jewellery and branded watches, the process to identify and label the jewellery.

He said Ag Tahir agreed the process be done at MACC’s office.

“The money were tied in bundles and kept inside four big travel bags and four bags of different sizes.

“For the jewellery and branded watches, we put it inside a bag and basket which was carried by Ag Tahir himself.

“All the exhibits including four luxury vehicles that were seized during the raid were brought to Sabah MACC’s office. We also seized the safe box that could not be opened and brought it to the office.

“The luxury vehicles namely Mercedes CGI250, Ford Ranger, BMW 535 and Mazda 6, were driven by four MACC officers.

“The exhibits were put inside a locked room together with the exhibits from Ag Tahir’s office.

 They were two MACC officers placed in front of the locked room on a rotating basis every eight hours to secure the access to the room,” he said.

On the same day, Hishamuddin received instruction to raid another house belonging to Ag Tahir in Taman Kingfisher Sulaman.

“Before we moved to the house, Ag Tahir informed that his daughter and her husband were living there and there was a safe box there but never used the box.

 Ag Tahir’s wife also informed me that she did not remember the combination number of the safe box.

“Upon arriving at the house, Ag Tahir asked the security guard to open the gate and his son-in-law also opened the door of the house.

“Fauziah brought us to the safe box and tried to open it few times but failed. I received instruction to bring the safe box to the MACC’s office.

“During the raid at the King Fisher house, we had seized three luxury vehicles namely Volvo, Range Rover and Audi.
“The safe box and the luxury vehicles were brought to MACC’s office,” he said.

Hishamuddin further testified that the list of confiscation of movable property for all exhibits that were found in Ag Tahir’s office, houses and vehicles had been prepared and at that time Ag Tahir refused to check in details the list of the seizure and only put his signature on the list.

On Oct 5, 2016, at 1.30am, Hishamuddin received instruction to arrest Ag Tahir and he immediately Ag Tahir ay 1.45am.

“I explained to Ag Tahir that he was arrested for committing an offence under Section 17(a) of MACC 2009 and instructed one officer to put Ag Tahir in Sabah MACC’s lockup.

“Meanwhile, Fauziah was sent home at 2am and all the MACC officers involved were instructed to call off and reminded to attend to office at 8am for further instruction and action.

“At 8.30am, I was instructed to bring Ag Tahir to Kota Kinabalu Magistrate’s court for remand application. The application was made by MACC Prosecuting Officer Mohd Faliq Basirun and the court granted the remand application which was from Oct 5 until Oct 10, 2016.

“After the remand application, I then started the recording statement from Ag Tahir at Sabah MACC’s office.

“At 3pm, I was instructed to bring all the exhibits that were seized from Ag Tahir to the meeting room of Sabah MACC’s office for press conference. During the press conference, all the exhibits were strictly guarded,” said Hishamuddin.

On Oct 8, 2016, Hishamuddin formed a small team for the purpose to send the exhibits to the Kota Kinabalu Bank Negara.

“The team consist of 10 MACC officers including me.

 At 10.30am, we arrived at the Bank Negara and the Bank Negara instructed for all the exhibits to be kept in special storage room which prepared by Bank Negara.

“After all the exhibits moved into the room, the room was locked and there were five set of keys which kept by Investigating Officer Chin Chen Huat,” he said.

On Oct 10, 2016, Ag Tahir’s remand was extended for another five days.

On Dec 8, 2016, Hishamuddin based on instruction, took the gemstones, jewelleries, luxury watches and pens from the Bank Negara MACC exhibit storage room and placed them in two hand carry luggage which then sealed and fly to Kuala Lumpur and placed them in safe of the Kuala Lumpur MACC Director for exhibit evaluation process by exhibit appraiser, Siow Der Ming at the ground floor of the Kuala Lumpur MACC on the next day on Dec 9.

He said they then took all the items back to Kota Kinabalu on Dec 12, 2016 and put them back at the Bank Negara Kota Kinabalu.

Meanwhile, Rosnizam Mansor, 47, a photographer, said 10 raiding teams were formed for separate raid localities during the raid in Ag Tahir’s office and houses as well as other locations.

Rosnizam said that based on the work divisions for the assignments, he was placed at secretarial affairs to help investigation officer.

On the raiding day, he informed the court that he was assigned to assist team number eight to do the raid, to escort the delivery of exhibits to the MACC’s office and to take photos of the exhibits at one of the raiding locations which was at the said department’s office.

“I took photos of money inside wall cabinet, at TV cabinet at pantry, inside a black bag, on the couch, on the working table, foreign currencies notes and credit cards, these were inside the former director’s room at his office.

“I was also instructed to take photos of cash, jewellery, branded watches and handbags allegedly found at Ag Mohd Tahir’s house for visual records to be handed over to investigation officer later,” he said.

Rosnizam said that he was further assigned to store the exhibits at a room at the MACC’s office, to keep the room’s safe key and to report the matters to operation coordinator officer.
He also said in his witness statement that he was assigned to assist in taking photos of seven seized cars which at that time were parked at the basement space of the MACC’s office.
On December 20, 2016, he was instructed to prepare a photography report.

Apart from that, Rosnizam further said that he was also instructed to prepare a photography report for six seized cars which involved in this case namely Audi, Volvo, Mazda, Ford Ranger, Mercedes-Benz and Toyota Land Cruiser.

Deputy Public Prosecutor (DPP) Zander Lim, DPP Mahadi Abdul Jumaat and DPP Haresh Prakash Somiah conducted the prosecution while Lim was defended by Datuk Tan Hock Chuan, Baldev Singh, Karpaljit Singh and Aaron Lau and counsel Priskila Akwila Sinem defended Ag Tahir and Fauziah.

Saturday 24 June 2023

沐胶医院的透析器该换了

沐胶医院的透析机该换了!

Tellian 砂议会议员说沐胶医院的透析机已经是很不堪状况。

大部份的仪器都超过18年,常常发生故障。有些根本找不到备件。

洗肾病人要去其他最近的Sibu或 Bintulu医院,路程至少也要2-3小时。

马联邦要解决的问题。同时他希望公众可以捐献。

这就是砂议员不管是联邦还是邦议员惯有的心态,无耻的要求公众去做他们无法做到的事。今天砂的不堪状况都是联邦和邦议员不负责任所造成的。

他也意识到医院缺少超音波和各种仪器。

他说医疗服务是联邦政府的管辖权,但是砂政府也会尽力而为。这就是砂议员们没有搞清楚联邦和邦的职责,所以,联邦政府才会得寸进尺。其实,在一般人的眼里,这联邦政府根本没有用。砂31联邦代表对砂一点建设也没有。

砂拉越如果能脱离联邦独立去会更好。

讲到最后,我还是认为是沐胶人民的错,怎么还是选没有作为的同一的代表数十年不变。真可悲!

马联邦贪污腐败,盗窃,朋党和种族主义

马联邦贪污舞弊滥权,盗窃,朋党和种族主义

他60年,国阵打压逼迫和种族歧视主义应该停了,是时候建立新马来西亚。他说用清晰思维和原谅的心去阅读这贪污腐败记录。

对我们砂拉越人来讲,我倒认为建立新砂拉越才是正道。原谅这些滥权贪官难如登天。毕竟,他们的财富是建立在砂拉越的贫穷上。这些被挥霍的财富至少80%是沙砂的。

作者说在T.A. Rahman 时代,马联邦是执行多元种族政策,不管在政府部门,军队或警察,那时对各种族可以说是最佳的时期。也没有什么贪污腐败的事件。

后来,国阵巫统掌权后就执行排非穆斯林主义,所有政府部门就只有单一慕斯林而已。

作者感叹现在到处都有回教堂,祈祷室,回教大学,等等,我们却面对全世界最严重的的贪污丑闻之一?

他列出70项贪污的案件提供参考。大多数是前首相马哈迪当任首相期间犯下的。他任意的挥霍Petronas 的油钱和国库的钱。

这些的挥霍无度和种种贪污腐败的损失都是建立在沙砂人民的贫穷落后上。

马哈迪任相22年至少挥霍掉RM1000亿。他和他家族更是捞得满堂红。

60年马联邦是以贪污舞弊滥权腐败,盗窃,朋党和种族歧视主义所标签。

作者有清楚列出37条,国阵政府采取的种族歧视和打压。什么都是以马来人为优先,造成各方方面面极度偏差。

60年的国阵联邦政府总于倒了。他们过去所造成的恶果,造就今天的后果。

生为砂拉越人,我只希望砂拉越早点独立去,因为,我不认为,马来西亚还有未来。

Friday 23 June 2023

Corruption, kleptocracy, cronyism and racism in Malaysia

Corruption, Kleptocracy, cronyism & racism in Malaysia
By Dato Shahruddin Ali
Demi ugama, bangsa dan negara… Six decades of oppression, suppression and discrimination has got to stop in order to build a new Malaysia. Read with a clean mind and a forgiving heart.

Impressive Historical records of corruption in Malaysia!

I am 60 years old and I have seen during Tunku Abdul Rahman’s time that we had one of the best military officers, it was because we had multiracial workforce throughout the Government sector

Why is it BN government removed non-Muslims and executed “Operasi isi Penuh” (Fill in full) to put Muslim population in all government Departments?

During Tunku Abdul Rahman’s time, we didn’t come across a single mosque or surau in any government, military or police department, and we didn’t come across any corruption. WHY WITH ALL THESE MOSQUES, SURAUS, UNIVERSITY ISLAM AND UITM, we are facing one of the worst corruption scandals in the world today????

List of corruption in Malaysia:
1. PKFZ RM12 billion
2. Submarine Commission RM500 million
3. Sime Darby RM964 million
4. Paya Indah Westland RM88 million
5. Pos Malaysia (Transmile) RM230 million loss
6. Eurocopter deal RM1 billion wasted
7. Terengganu stadium collapse RM292 million
8. MRR2 reapir cost RM70 million
9. Maybank overpaid BII RM4 billion
10. Tourism – NYY kickback RM10 million
11. Three paintings bought by MAS RM1.5 million
12. Overpayment by Sport Ministry RM8.4 million 
13. London’s white elephant sport complex RM70 million
14. MATRADE repairs RM120 million
15. Cost of new plane used by PM RM200 million
16. InventQ irrecoverable debt228 million
17. Compensation for killing crooked bridge RM257 million
18. Loss of selling Agusta RM510 million
19. Worth of Aps given out in a year 1.8 billion
20. Submarines (future Mazium Negara artifacts) RM4.1 billion
21. PSC Naval dockyard RM6.75 billion
22. The Bank Bumiputra in the early 1980s saw US$1 billion loss
       (RM3.2 billion in 2008)
23. The Maminco attempt to corner the World Tin Market in the 
        1980s is believed to have cost US$500 million (RM1.6 billion)
24. Betting in foreign exchange futures cost Bank Negara Malaysia 
       RM30 billion in the 1990s
25. Perwaja Steel’s US$800 million (RM2.56 billion) losses
26. Use of RM10 billion public funds in the Valuecap Sdn Bhd 
      operation to shore up the stock market
27. Banking scandal of RM700 million losses in Bank Islam
28. The sale of M.V. Agusta by Proton for one Euro making a loss of 
       E75.99 million (RM348) million same as No. 20 above?
29. Wang Ehsan from oil royalty on Terengganu RM7.4 billion from    
       2004 to 2007
30. For the past 10 years since Philharmonic Orchestra was 
       established, this Orchestra has swallowed a total of RM500 
       million Hiring a Kwai-Lo Ceo with a salary of more than RM1 
       million per annum
31. In Advisors Fees, Mahathir was paid RM180,000; Shahrizat Abdul 
       RM404,726 and Abdul Hamid Othman (religious) RM549,675 per 
       annum
32. The government has spent a total of RM3.2 billion in teaching 
       Maths, Science & English over the past five years. Of the 
       amount , the government paid a whopping RM2.21 billion for 
       the purchase of information and computer technology (ICT) 
       equipment which it is unable to give a breakdown, government  
       paid more than RM6,000 per notebook vs per market price of 
       less than RM3,000 through some new consortdiums that were 
       setup just to transact the notebook deal. There was no Maths & 
       Science Content for the teachers and the notebooks are all with 
       the teachers’ children now.
33. The commission paid for purchase of jets and submarines to two 
       private companies Perimeker Sdn Bhd and IMT Definence Sdn 
       Bhd amount to RM910 million. Expanding on No. 2 above?
34. RM300 million to companies Gerbang Perdana ffor the 
       RM1.1billion “Crooked Scenic Half Bridge” 
35. RM1.3 billion has been wasted building the white elephant 
       Customes, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) facilities on 
       cancellation of the Malaysia-Singapore Scenic Bridge.
36. RM100 million on renovation of Parliament building which leaks
37. National Astronaut (actually space tourist) programme – RM 40 
       million
38. National Services Training Programmes yearly on estimating of 
       RM500 million
39. Eye of Malaysia – RM30 million and another 5.7 billion on free 
       tickets
40. RM2.4 million on indelible ink
41. Samy Vellu announced in September 2006 that the government 
      paid compensation amounting to RM38.5 billion to 20 Highway 
      companies. RM 380 million windfalls for 9 toll concessionaires 
      earned solely from the toll hike in 2008 alone
42. RM32 million timber export kickbacks involving companies 
       connected to Sarawak Chief Minister and his family
43. Two bailouts of Malaysia Airline system RM17.9 billion at a time 
       when MAS is incurring losses every year. RM1.55 million used 
       to buy three painting to decorate its Chairman’s (Munir Majid) 
       office. Expanding from No. 11 above
44. Putra transport system bailout which cost RM4.486 billion
45. STAR-LRT bailout costingRM3.256 billion 
46. National sewerage system bailout costing RM192.56 million
47. Seremban-Port Dickson Highway bailout costing RM142 million
48. Kuching Prison bailout costing RM135 million
49. Kajian Makanan dan Gunaan Orang Islam bailout costing RM8.3 
       million
50. Le Tour de Langkawi bailout costing RM3.5 million
51. Wholesale distribution of tens of million of shares in Bursa 
       Malaysia under the guise of NEP to cronies children and relatives 
       of BN leaders and ministers worth billions of ringgit
52. Alienation of tens of thousand of hectares of commercial land 
      forestry concessions to children and relatives of BN leaders and  
      Ministers worth tens of billions of ringgits.
53. Since 1997, Petronas has handed out a staggering RM30 billion 
       in natural gas subsidies to IPPs who were reaping huge profits.  
       In addition, there were much wastages and forward tading of 
       Petronas oil in the 1990s based on the low price of oil then.  
       Since the accounts of Petronas are for the eyes of the Prime 
       Minister only, we have absolutely no idea of the amount.
54. RM5,700 for a car jack worth only RM50.
55. Government-owned vehicle consumed a tank of petrol worth 
      RM113 within a few minutes.
56. A pole platform that cost RM990 was bought for RM30,000.
57. A thumb drive that costs RM90 was bought for RM480
58. A cabinet that cost RM1,500 was bought for RM13,500
59. A flashlight that cost RM35 was bought for RM143.
60. Expeses for 1Malaysia campaign paid to APCO?
61. RM17 billion subsidy to IPP
62. US$24 million Diamond Ring for Ro$mah – Cancellation of Order 
       – how much compensation?
63. Cowgate – RM250 million
64. Monsoon Cup – RM800 million per year
65. illicit Fund Transfer out of Malaysia (2000-2009):  
      RM1,077,000,000,069
66. Tajudin Danaharta settlement to cover-up for Dr M and Daim 
67. Billions of ringgit toll concessions that disadvantaged the 
      government and taxpayers.
68. With 1MDB, 42 billion dollars missing.
69. MAIDA SHARE 120,000,000 shares in TELEKOM
70. ABU SYAYAP TERRORIST 12 MILLION DOLLARS

I am 60 years old. NEP is supposed to end in 1999. Now NEP beign used as an excuse to implement Islamic values in all schools, Universities, Police Departments, Government Departments.   

WHY ARE INDIANS TREATED LIKE GANGSTERS BY PM AND DEPUTY PM? WHY IS IT ALWAYS NON-MUSLIMS BRANDED AS KAFIR (JAHIL-LOW CLASS HUMANS)?

Malaysia is possibly the most racist country in the world with the following segregation. Have a look and judge for yourself.

List of racial discrimination in Malaysia:
1. Of the five major banks, only one is multi-racial, the rest are 
     controlled by Malays.
2. 99% of Petronas directors are Malays.
3. 3% of Petronas emplyees are Chinese.
4. 99% of 2000 Petronas gasoline stations are owned by Malays.
5. 100% all contractors workingunder Petronas projects must be of 
     Bumi status.
6. 0% of non-Malay staff are legally required in Maly companies.  
     But there must be 30% Malay staffs in Chinese companies.
7. 5% of all new intake for government police, nurses, army, are 
     non-Malay.
8. 2% is the present Chinese staff in Royal Malaysian Air Force 
     (RMAF); a drop from 40% in 1960.
9. 2% is the % of non-Malay government servants in Putrajaya, with 
     Malays making up 98%
10. 7% is the % of Chinese government servants in the entire 
      government (in 2004); a drop from 30% in 1960.
11. 95% of government contracts are given to Malays.
12. 100% all business licences are controlled by Malay government, 
       e.g. Taxi permits, approved permits, etc.
13. 80% of the Chinese rice millers in Kedah had to be sold to 
      Malay controlled Bernas in 1980s. otherwise, life is made difficult 
      for Chinese rice millers.
14. 100 big companies set up, owned and managed by Chinese 
       Malaysians were taken over by government, and later managed 
       by Malays since 1970s, e.g. UTC, UMBC, MISC, etc.
15. At least 10 chinese owned bus companies (throughout Malaysia 
      in the past 40 years) had to be sold to MARA or other Malay 
      transport companies due to rejection by Malay authorities to 
      Chinese applications for bus routes and rejection for their 
      application for new buses.
16. Two Chinesetaxi drivers were barred from driving from Johore 
       Larkin bus statation. There are about 30 taxi dievers and three 
       were Chinese in Oct. 2004. Spoiling taxi club properties was the 
      reason was the reason given.
17. 0 non-Malays are allowed to get shoplots in the new Muar bus 
      station (Nov. 2004)
18. 8000 billion ringgit is the total amount the government 
       channelled to Malay pickets through ASB. ASM. ,MARA, 
       privatisation of government agencies, Tabung Haji etc, through 
       NEP over a 34 years period.
19. 48 Chinese primary schools closed down from 1968-2000.
20. 144 Indian primary schools closed doen from 1968-2000.
21. 2637 Malay primary schools have been built from 1968-2000
22. 2.5% is government budget for Chinese Primary schools.  
      Indian schools got only 1%, Malay schools got 96.5%
23. While a Chinese with RM1000 monthly salary cannot get 
       textbook loan, a Malay parent with RM2000 monthly salary is 
       eligible.
24. All 10 publice universities Vice Chancellors are Malays.
25. 5% of the government universities lecturers are of non-Malay 
       origins. This % has been reduced from about 70% in 1965 to 
       only 5% in 2004.
26. Only 5% has been given to non-Malays for government 
      scholarships in over 40 years.
27. O Chinese or Indians were sent to Japan and Korea under the 
      “Look East Policy”.
28. 128 STPM Chinese top students could not get into the course to 
       which they aspired, i.e. Medicine (in 2004)
29. 10% quotas are in place for non-Bumi students for MARA 
      science schools beginning in 2003, but only 7% are filled. Before 
      that it was 100% Malays
30. Fifty cases in which Chinese and Indian Malaysians are beaten 
      up in the National Service progam in 2003.
31. 25% of the Malaysian population was Chinese in 2004, a drop 
      from 45% in 1957.
32. 7% of the Malaysian is Indian (2004), a drop from 12% in 1957.
33. Two million Chinese Malaysians have emigrated in the past 40 
       years.
34. 0.5 million Indian Malaysians have emigrated overseas.
35. 3 millions Indonesians have migrated to Malaysia and become 
      Malaysian with Bumi status.
36. 600,000 Chinese and Indian Malaysians with red IC were rejected repeatedly when applying for citizenship in the past 40 years. Perhaps 60% of them had already passed away due to old age. *this shows racism, based on how easily Indonesians got their citizenships compared with the Chinese and Indians
37. 5%--15% discount for a Malay to buy a house.

I AM 60 YEARS OLD AND I LOST MY TRUST IN ALL OUT MUSLIM LEADERS.

Dato Shahruddin Ali

I have seen these details previously which is very painful for non-Malays to read and digest. To me these details are truthful and I am proud of the person(s) who compiled all these facts. Hopefully, more Malays should read the content to realise it is their own kind who is cheating them most.

Thursday 22 June 2023

Anwar finally made a move

<translation> 🧐
The latest blockbuster! Anwar finally made a move! Mahathir was checkmate, dead chess! 

Anwar officially submitted official evidence to the court today, proving that during his tenure as prime minister & finance minister, Mahathir had indeed abused his power for personal gain, & privately awarded billions of overseas crude oil contracts to his son! The accusation of Mahathir's greed & abuse of power for personal gain has been confirmed!

According to the data, in 2002 when Mahathir was still the Prime Minister & Minister of Finance, he used his privileges to privately award an overseas oil field exploration contract worth billions to Kencana Petroleum, & the behind-the-scenes boss of this oil company was Mahathir 2nd son Mokhzani!

Mahathir brought Anwar to court earlier & asked Anwar to show evidence that he abused his power to support his children. The claimed innocent Mahathir asked Anwar to produce evidence, otherwise it would be slander, & Mahathir would demand compensation for defamatory damages .

Now Anwar has finally come up with evidence, which is evidence from the Ministry of Finance archives & government secret documents, which only the Prime Minister has the right to declassify & make public.

 Anwar very ironically quoted Mahathir's famous words: "During my tenure as prime minister, I absolutely did not allow my children to engage in politics or business, let alone use my privilege to obtain government engineering contracts in private. Absolutely not allowed". But now the facts speak louder than words. Prime Minister Anwar presented the 1st evidence, which can fully prove that Mahathir did one thing & said another. It is true that the privilege gave his 3 sons to the windmill, & all become billionaires, sitting on hundreds of billions of asset property!

Mahathir has now been slapped hard by Anwar for the 1st time. I believe more exciting revelations will come one after another!

(The full text is reproduced from Zhang Danfeng)

重建砂拉越

重建砂拉越
认清砂拉越现有的身份就是还没有独立的一个国家。

1963年砂拉越是在英国政府操作下被动和被迫加入马来亚联邦。马来亚联邦就更名为马来西亚联邦。就这样咱们砂拉越就轻易的被马来亚殖民到今天。

最近,砂政盟搞砂拉越60周年独立庆祝。世界哪一个国家可以在联邦内独立?如果可以,苏格兰何必还要向英国政府寻求独立公投呢?

看新加坡和汶莱,哪一项目不是独立自主决定一切。反观咱们砂拉越哪一项目可以独立自主的?

咱们砂拉越什么都要马联邦政府申请准证才敢进行。

其实咱们砂拉越完全被马来亚政府掌控耍弄在手中。

要个精品航空,必须向马联邦申请。教育医疗还在索执行权。这不是全权自主哦!

砂政盟的这群的政治小丑一面装模作样扮演独立,另一面活像奴才,总是任由马联邦政客摆布。

马联邦吃喝拉撒都是靠咱们沙砂两国提供,我问你们为什么要这么贱?

沙砂是有权力寻求独立的。可是沙砂政府自废这权力。

重建砂拉越国成为一个独立自主国家像新加坡或汶莱。砂人,第一步就是更换砂政盟领袖,选本土的反对党领袖替代。

当砂反对党力量强大起来后,在时限内索回所有砂拉越的权益。其实,自主权的总和就接近主权目标。

到时,要合伙,就要三国平等伙伴关系。必须成立专属三国联邦议会。现有的其实就是马来亚联邦议会沙砂根本不适合在这联邦议会内。

不然,就向联合国求公道去,来个一拍三散的好戏。

诗巫命名再一次

Sibu 命名再一次 (12/12/2004)
【饱食之后,思淫欲】,不知道是那位圣贤的名言绝句。虽然,我不完全认同,但,我是肯定饱食后,无所事事,无聊,除了,思淫欲,很爱搞花样,搬弄是非,不思创意,却热爱涂改。

饱食后,没事做,如果有点钱,死咯,就爱胡搞,也爱胡思乱想。不然怎么会把诗巫这地名如此严重的联想到【老巫婆】或来个倒读成【巫师】。

如果,一个地方极度贫穷,地名听起来像狗狗又像猫猫或更不行的语音;吃都是大问题,看谁还有什么闲情惬意去涂改地名

再说这世界语言语音千千万万种, Sibu就以华语语音来断定雅不雅呗? 要新命名Sibu非命名不可。我劝好事者多多考量各国各地的语言语音,不然新命名,搞不好,听起来,像大家身上某器官。更糟的说不定是男或女的生殖器官或是身上隐藏的毛(1),嘿嘿嘿。。。。,这可叫【弄巧反拙】,那时,可笑死人咯!

来。。。。有请大家读读这些字词或片语,看大家有何联想:
土狼叫, 奶油饼,几百块,鸡排,珠兰,兰珠,等等

没有【高人】指点,没有人觉察到,一授指点后,我肯定语音联想便上线咯。从此,一听这语音,马上(马下)联想多多。

诗巫命名百年多,很有历史价值。我们贫苦祖先默默耕耘,从来未把【诗巫】联想成老巫婆/巫师。 2004年,有位无聊的人提起,2010年,又有一个follow up, 有意行动涂改,真无聊。(2)

大家想一想,把诗巫华文地名两个字,英文一个字涂改会造成/引发多少其他方面的涂改和不便,何苦呢?

诗巫地名雅不雅,那里是靠更改地名上位。谈【雅】说【干净】。我倒认为地方领袖多花点心思教导大家【不随意吐痰,丢垃圾】,提高人民素养。

【谈雅说谈吐】,想一想如何教导 ?%的诗巫人【不要用脏话】。福州人(3)骂的臭话都是不堪入耳。请大家解读一下这些福州人的臭话,便知道了。

我肯定很多人用臭话,没有任何感觉,也从来没有解读过,所以可以如此【轻言重用】。

最后,引用莎翁(Shakespeare)对玫瑰花的评价赠送给一群无聊的人去思考:
玫瑰花不管以什么命名都是一样芬芳。
A rose by any other name would smell as sweet.

注:
(1) 一个语音在一个语音系统含意是好,而在另一个语音系统可能语意是不好的哦。正如【好】/hao/这语音,在另一个语音可能是【坏】。 正如【Air】,英语是空气而马来语是【水】也
             
(2) 2023年,又有人从提

(3) 全天下的赃话,应该都是一样的不堪入耳。

这是我2004年,有感而发的文章。今天,看到这篇【英雄没走,诗巫别怕】,(文:邱汉明)从新勾起,我对有人这一次想把诗巫改成【诗富】,我还是我是反对到底。我有足够反对的原因。

送上的还是那一篇:站坐不改姓名

站不改姓,坐不改名
诗巫,诗巫是诗巫
诗巫不是老巫婆
诗巫不是美诗鹅

站不改姓,坐不改名
诗巫,诗巫是诗巫
诗巫命名百年多
改来改去错乱多。

诗巫记好要忘记,
说来说去不容易

站不改姓,坐不改名
诗巫,诗巫是诗巫
诗巫不必改名叫诗鹅(诗富)
涂来擦去麻烦多
忘记诗巫,记诗鹅(诗富)
容易混乱容易错

站不改姓,坐不改名
诗巫,诗巫是诗巫
改天改地,麻烦错乱多
浪费资源,光阴,解释多
三思不改诗巫为诗富
四思还是锁定诗巫这命名。

20/6/23 Tue

Sarawakian activist question Malaysian Citizenship, native status for Taib Mahmud 's Syria-born wife, Stepsons

Malay Mail
Sarawakian activist questions Malaysian citizenship, native status for Taib Mahmud’s Syria-born wife, stepsons
Sulok Tawie
Tue, 20 June 2023 at 2:54 pm MYT·3-min read
Malay Mail
Malay Mail
KUCHING, June 20 — Sarawak human rights activist Peter John Jaban today called on the state government, Council of Customs and Traditions and the National Registration Department (NRD) to investigate and rescind the native status conferred on Toh Puan Raghad Kurdi Taib, the Syria-born wife of the current Governor Tun Abdul Taib Mahmud, and her two sons from a previous relationship.

Jaban, who is also information chief of the Sarawak Association of People's Aspiration, said the native status was granted to Raghad and her two sons surfaced after Taib's children took legal action to reclaim their late mother’s assets, including shares in public-listed Cahya Mata Sarawak (CMS) Berhad.

He added that Sarawakians are concerned about the Malaysian citizenship and native recognition for Raghad and her two foreign-born sons that mean they now have the right to own native title lands when there are local-born who are unable to inherit their ancestral lands due to strict rules.

“It is a travesty that Raghad and her two sons should be facing a future of extreme wealth and status that has been denied to so many genuine natives and, indeed, genuine Sarawakians,” Jaban said in a statement.

He said there are thousands of people born in Sarawak to native parents who remain stateless while Raghad and her sons are recognised as Melanau by race and Malaysian citizens after she married Taib.

“There are thousands more Sarawakians who are unable to inherit their ancestral lands from their native parents as they are the products of mixed marriages.

“But now we are facing the very real prospect that this Syria-born woman, with precious little connection to Sarawak other than an advantageous marriage, might walk away with a fortune in Sarawak’s wealth.

“Our current Sarawak government must prevent this from happening or face serious discord among the Sarawak people,” Jaban said.

He said applications for Sarawak’s native status come with very strict requirements, including knowledge of the culture and the language and longstanding connection to a community.

“This is verified in detail through interviewing and testing,” Jaban said, adding that in practice, the process is extremely lengthy, commonly taking up to 20 years to process.

“Clearly, Raghad has not only jumped the queue but also been given preferential treatment throughout,” he said.

Jaban said that even if native status is conferred by the NRD, the ownership of Sarawak native land requires both parents to be natives as prescribed under Chapter 61 of the Interpretation Act 2005.

He added that Sarawakians of mixed-parentage – meaning only one parent is a native – are denied the ability to inherit their ancestral lands by the Sarawak Lands and Survey Department.

Jaban said it would be a mockery of the rule of law and the right of all Malaysians for Raghad and her two sons to be allowed to inherit native lands as naturalised Malaysians and recognised Melanaus.

“I know so many people who have fallen foul of this,” he said, citing as an example a local-born farmer with one Iban parent who is currently leasing land because he does not qualify to inherit his father’s land in Lundu.

安华终于出招

🔥最新勁爆🔥
安華終於出招❗
馬哈迪被將軍
死棋❗
安華今日正式向法庭提呈官方證據
證明馬哈迪擔任首相及財政部長期間
確實曾經濫權營私
將高達數🔟億海外原油🈴約
私下頒發給自己的兒子❗
做實了TⓂ️貪婪枉法、濫權營私指控❗
根據絕密資料顯示
2️⃣0️⃣0️⃣2️⃣年TⓂ️仍然擔任首相兼財政部長時期
運用特權將1️⃣項價值數🔟億的海外油田開採🈴約私下頒發給Kencana Petroleum
而這家油公司的幕後老闆正是馬哈迪的2️⃣兒子莫扎尼❗
馬哈迪較早前將安華控上法庭
要安華拿出當年濫權扶持自己孩子證據
自認清白馬哈迪要安華拿出證據
否則就是誹謗
馬哈迪將要求安華賠償名譽損失
現在安華終於拿出證據了這些都是來自財政部檔案和政府機密文檔的證據
只🈶首相才有權將它解密公諸於世
安華非常具🈶諷刺性第引用馬哈迪當年的名言:
(在我擔任首相期間
我絕對不允許我的孩子從政或者從商
更不允許他們私下運用我的特權獲取政府的工程🈴約
我絕對不允許》
但是現在事實勝於雄辯
首相安華出示第1️⃣份證據完全🉑以證明馬哈迪將1️⃣套做1️⃣套
他確實運用特權讓3️⃣個兒子搭上順風車
個個成為億萬富翁
坐擁數💯億身家財產❗
馬哈迪現在被安華狠狠摑了第1️⃣個耳光
相信更精彩的爆料將陸續🈶來⁉️

Tuesday 20 June 2023

TunM squandered RM529 billion of Petronas money

Tun M wasted more than RM529 billion of Petronas money since 1970, saving Mirzan & Mokhzani's losses - Tengku Razaleigh

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah yesterday claimed that the former 4th and 7th PM, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad had caused the country's petroleum giant, Petronas, to lose more than RM500 billion since 1979.

The shocking revelation was shared by FB user Peter Terence D'Cruz yesterday afternoon.

March 21, 2023

The founding chairman of Petronas and its first CEO, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah said that the federal government in Putrajaya under Mahathir has been treating the oil and gas corporation as a cash cow, especially in bailing out government-linked companies in financial trouble.

Petronas provided the money to build some of former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed's most grandiose projects, including the KL Twin Towers, the Putra Jaya administrative capital and to bring Formula One racing in Malaysia.

Petronas was used to get Malaysia out of an RM31.5 billion forex scandal perpetrated by Mahathir in the early 1990s in which the financier George Soros outfoxed Bank Negara, making billions and earning Mahathir's eternal antagonism. It paid off US$800 million in losses from Mahathir's ill-fated Perwaja Steel project. In 1998, it bailed out Mahathir's eldest son Mirzan, purchasing his Shipping Consortium for RM226 million and assuming debts of more than RM324 million. It also awarded in 2012 a RM700 contract to a firm in which Mahathir's other son Mokhzani was a vice president.

Tengku Razaleigh, or Ku Li, said that since its inception in 1974, Petronas has paid out RM529 billion to the government in the form of dividends, taxes, petroleum revenue and export duties.

He also said the government's reliance on Petronas to rescue financially floundering government-linked companies (GLCs) had been going on since 1985.
Ku Li was the Minister of Finance from 1974 to 1984.

In 1985, Petronas bailed out Bank Bumiputra with a Rm2.5 billion infusion. In 1991, Petronas shored up the banks' finances again when it pumped in an additional RM1 billion.

In 1997, he said Petronas had to rescue the troubled Konsortium Perkapalan Berhad for RM2 billion.

He added that Petronas was made to underwrite the construction of the KLCC Twin Towers for RM6 billion and the construction of Putrajaya for a further RM22 billion.

"This amount could have been used more productively to fund a national pension program for Malaysians, as has been done by a certain Scandinavian country," he said in his speech at the launch of the book "Rich Malaysia, Poor Malaysians" at the Sultan Sulaiman Club in Kuala Lumpur last night.

The bailout and construction of mega projects was done during the premiership of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who initiated a series of major infrastructure ventures in the 1990s.

Ku Li said the exorbitant amount of the bailout and construction of these projects that was forced onto Petronas had also deprived the company of the much needed cash build-up for reinvestment, which would ensure its business sustainability.

He said today Petronas was on par with oil majors and was ranked as one of Fortune 500's largest and most profitable oil and gas companies.

"But sadly, it is being abused and treated as the piggy bank whenever the government needs cash in a hurry," he said.
Ku Li said while subsidizing consumer goods was not the most efficient of ways in managing the high cost of living, it was fairly understandable if the government extended a helping hand to the little man.

"What is sinful and cannot be forgiven is the ease with which the powers that be had been dishing out subsidies to such entities like the national power supplier, the independent power producers and some other non-power outfits," he said.

During the last few months of Mahathir's second stint as prime minister, he tried to look at possible ways Petronas could raise funds. One of his ideas was to break up Petronas into smaller business units, the Petronas Chemicals Group, Petronas Carigali, and Petronas Gas, selling equity off to Sabah and Sarawak state governments.

With tourism, air transport, and logistics depressed, national governments, including Malaysia will have to go deeper into deficit financing to pump their respective economies.

This is a dilemma for Petronas which will be under extreme pressure to pay some form of dividend to help the government manage the upcoming budget. Without help from Petronas, the finance minister will have to canvass a reintroduction of the GST, maybe even at a higher rate than previously, increases of income and corporate tax, and even the introduction of new taxes. The company has been a major contributor to Malaysia's wealth. However, times are changing where it may not be a dependable lifeline for much longer.

Monday 19 June 2023

1963年将沙巴砂拉越移交给马来西亚


1963 年将沙巴砂拉越主权移交给马来亚是非法的
(Robert Pei 18-06-2023)

未经人民同意,1963 年将沙巴砂拉越主权移交给马来亚是非法的

 联合国对沙巴和砂拉越支持马来西亚的结论的评论是不准确的。

 英国从未合法地获得人民根据联合国第 1541 号决议自由给予的同意,将他们各自的国家转移到马来亚。

 联合国的评估是基于并依赖于一份有缺陷和篡改的科博德报告,该报告被修改为声明大多数人“支持”马来西亚。

 其次,联合国违反了自己的非殖民化规则,没有坚持进行公民投票以了解人民对马来西亚的看法,尤其是在该计划遭到强烈反对的情况下。

 从文莱反马起义、英国大规模逮捕反对马来西亚的人、联合国代表团访问期间在砂拉越城镇举行的大规模反马来西亚示威,到 1962 年至 1990 年抵抗马来西亚的游击战,都可以看到这种反对。人联党提出 一份有 120K 签名(1962 年砂拉越人口的 1/7)的请愿书被英国人无视。

 此外,联合国也没有考虑 MA63 的有效性。 它还无视文莱党和 TNKU 与英国谈判独立的停火呼吁,违反了 Reso 1514。

 因此,在英国持续镇压反对马来西亚的势力的情况下,马来西亚于 1963 年 9 月 16 日在强制紧急状态下仓促宣布。

 也有人注意到,马来亚参与寻求接管沙巴和砂拉越是外部干涉我们人民自由行使自决权的过程,也违反了反对新殖民化的联合国非殖民化宣言。

 我们必须继续揭露马来亚人及其当地支持者关于马来西亚是如何创建的谎言。



TRANSFER OF SABAH SARAWAK SOVEREIGNTY TO MALAYA IN 1963 WAS UNLAWFUL WITHOUT THE PEOPLE CONSENT

The comment on the UN's conclusion on Sabah and Sarawak's support for Malaysia is inaccurate. 

The UK never legally obtained the people's consent freely given under UN Reso 1541 to transfer their respective countries to Malaya.  

The UN assessment was based on and relied on a flawed and doctored Cobbold Report which was amended to state that the majority of the people "supported" Malaysia. 

Secondly, the UN breached its own rules on decolonization by not insisting on conducting a referendum to gauge the people's view on Malaysia especially when there was strong opposition to the plan. 

This opposition was seen in the Brunei Anti-Malaysias uprising, British mass arrests of people opposing Malaysia, massive anti-Malaysia demos in Sarawak towns during the UN Mission team's visit and then the guerilla war to resist Malaysia from 1962 to 1990. The SUPP presented a petition of 120K signatures (1/7 of Sarawak's population in 1962) which was ignored by the British.

Further, the UN also did not look at MA63 validity. It also breached Reso 1514 by ignoring the ceasefire call by the Brunei Party & TNKU to negotiate independence with the UK. 

Thus Malaysia was hastily declared on 16 Sept 1963 under coercive emergency conditions with the ongoing British suppression of forces opposing Malaysia.

It is also noted that the Malayan involvement in seeking to take over Sabah and Sarawak was an external interference with the process of our people freely exercising self-determination and also breached the UN Decolonization Declaration against new colonisation.    

We must continue to expose the Malayan and their local supporters' lies about how Malaysia was created.

Saturday 17 June 2023

刘仁祥:重建Bukit Assek

刘仁祥:Bukit Assek 重建---分杯羹给中区建筑商和地主

诗巫省华团会长认为政府要推行重建Bukit Assek 计划会对中区经济产生强大推动力。

据他说诗巫市议会的工程部和诗巫建筑商已发展一套在煤炭地建屋和路的工艺和标准。

谈发展,一定会联想中区农业发展。以目前实相,90%农地是种油棕。我认为单一种植是很不安全的。一旦遇到虫害,全军覆没;一旦跌价,损失惨重。农业耕种必须多样化。

谈到农业,就自然联想土地。其实中区一大片土地是闲置。政府地因政客们私心太重难申请;习俗地界限模糊,有地契地主通常块幅小。

我倒认为大中小农地有各自发展空间。大规模走向智能化适合大量生产出口。中小农业应付内需。

说中区适合种黄梨和椰树。我认为种植多样化水果才是硬道理。

官方的鼓励和扶持政策大中小农业很重要。银行贷款必须处处方便农民。

除了陆地的耕作,沐胶省到Tanjung Manis 一带很适合海洋牧场做商业养鱼。这可以多多参考国外先进智能化养鱼法。

是时候调整农业部,让他发挥作用。为了不浪费资源,去除联邦农业部,留砂邦的。同时清除贪污舞弊滥权和种族歧视弊端。

热带农产品在温带有很大市场,各相关部门是时候大力开拓市场;鼓励发展加工;增加投资者信心;让产品出口;加强技术研究等等。

木材业在中区算是全面退化。所以,规划新工业,事先准备好像Bintulu Semalaju 工业园。

于其去规划新工业区,还是好好处置一下Tanjung Manis 清真工业区。

工业都是以出口为导向以赚取外汇。Sibu 造船业就是一个好列子。

政府除了要大力扶持该行业,其他领域的行业,政府也要一视同仁。

发展绝对不可缺旅游业。中区城镇都有独特美食,有着丰富的旅游资源像生态旅游都可以发展中区的特色内容。政府相关部门必须进行勘探。

拉让江本身和上下游有着无限发展空间。

世界已经进入高科技智能化时代。一定要发展高科技智能化工作以提升经济留住人才。

政府的责任是和私人界一起开设技术学院培养人才。

记得各行业可以带动相关行业发展。

刘先生说发展是硬道理考核执政党是否可以继续生存;联邦跟邦议员是否可以蝉联。

发展一定要惠及各阶层人民,中区工程当然必须让中区建筑商和地主能参与和享受发展成果。

Thursday 15 June 2023

Towns in Sarawak

As Sarawakian,which town place in Sarawak you don't go yet?Maybe one day later you will go there..For job or for fun things..

1.Kuching 
2.Kota Samarahan
3.Sriaman(Simanggang)
4.Sarikei
5.Sibu
6.Bintulu
7.Miri
8.Limbang
9.Lawas
10.Lingga
11.Sebuyau
12.Selangau
13.Mukah
14.Matu
15.Daro
16.Balingian
17.Tatau
18.Kapit
19.Kanowit
20.Long lama
21.Marudi
22.Bekenu
21.Bakong
22.Batu Niah
23.Lundu
24.Sematan
25.Bario
26.Saratok
27.Betong
28.Tanjong Manis
29.Rejang

Wednesday 14 June 2023

沙巴20点

沙巴20点最低要求备忘录

1962 年 8 月 13 日至 14 日     唐納德·斯蒂芬斯 (Donald Stephens) 召集了一次沙巴政治領導人會議( The United Party, The Democratic Party and the Pasok Momogun Party, UNKO and USNO ),他們起草了一份 14 點(後來是 20 點)的最低要求備忘錄。這得到了砂拉越的支持。 


第一点:宗教

虽然伊斯兰教被列为马来西亚官方宗教而没有做出任何反对,然而伊斯兰教不应该在北婆罗洲实行。且所有在马来亚联合邦宪法中有关伊斯兰教的法规应当不许在北婆罗洲实行。

第二点:语文

马来文应该被列为马来西亚国语。
英文必须持续使用至到十年后的马来西亚日。
无论在何时、何地点或对洲与直辖区执行的目的,英文必须列为北婆罗洲的官方语言。

第三点:宪法

虽然北婆罗洲接受马来亚宪法作为马来西亚宪法的基础,马来西亚宪法需要是一份新的草拟文件,并需得到各州的同意。北婆罗洲的新宪法亦应受到重视。

第四点:联邦最高元首

北婆罗洲元首无权角逐马来西亚最高元首。

第五点:联邦名称

是“马来西亚”,而不是“大马来亚”。

第六点:入境事务

应与中央(联邦政府)联合管理,但中央政府对北婆罗洲的一切移民事务应先得到北婆罗洲政府的首肯。除安全理由外,中央政府对人员入境北婆罗洲并没有否决权。北婆罗洲在入境与出境事务中有保留权。

第七点:退出权力

北婆罗洲不应有权从联邦脱离。

第八点:婆罗洲化

指定当地人成为北婆罗洲公务员的过程应尽快实行。

第九点:英国官员

尽量鼓励英籍官员留任直到有适当北婆罗洲人选可以取代时为止。

第十点:国籍

根据科博德委员会报告的第148(k)段,北婆罗洲下列居民持有马来西亚国籍:
在北婆罗洲居住满五年
十年内有七年在北婆罗洲居住
出生于北婆罗洲,父母为北婆罗洲居民

第十一点:税收和金融

北婆罗洲负责自己的财务、发展及税收,并有权自行征税及借贷。

第十二点:原住民或土著人的特殊地位

北婆罗洲土著应享有类似于马来亚联合邦马来人的特权,但现有马来亚模式对北婆罗洲未必完全适用。

第十三点:政府

北婆罗洲总理由立法会非官守议员选出。
北婆罗洲实行部长制。

第十四点:转型时期

在加入马来西亚的七年过渡期内,北婆罗洲之立法权力将由北婆罗洲宪法赋予,联邦政府暂无权力插手
第十五点:教育

北婆罗洲的教育系统会被保留,并由北婆罗洲政府控制。

第十六点:保护宪法

在未获得北婆罗洲政府的同意之下,联邦政府没有权利修订或废除保护北婆罗洲权益的条文。
北婆罗洲的修宪权归北婆罗洲人民所有。

第十七点:联邦议会的代表

联邦国会的代表不仅仅应取决于北婆罗洲人口但也必须取决于州的面积,国会代表的人数亦不可少过新加坡代表的数量。

第十八点:首长名称

国家元首。

第十九点:国家名称
沙巴。

第二十点:土地、森林、当地政府和其他

联邦宪法规定之国家土地局权力并不适用于北婆罗洲。同样地,北婆罗洲亦不属地方政府委员会的权力范围内。


The 20 points

Point 1: Religion

While there was no objection to Islam being the national religion of Malaysia, there should be no State religion in North Borneo, and the provisions relating to Islam in the present Constitution of Malaya should not apply to North Borneo.

Point 2: Language

a. Malay should be the national language of the Federation

b. English should continue to be used for a period of 10 years after Malaysia Day

c. English should be an official language of North Borneo for all purposes, State or Federal, without limitation of time.

Point 3: Constitution

Whilst accepting that the present Constitution of the Federation of Malaya should form the basis of the Constitution of Malaysia, the Constitution of Malaysia should be a completely new document drafted and agreed in the light of a free association of states and should not be a series of amendments to a Constitution drafted and agreed by different states in totally different circumstances. A new Constitution for North Borneo was of course essential.

Point 4: Head of Federation

The Head of State in North Borneo should not be eligible for election as Head of the Federation.

Point 5: Name of Federation

"Malaysia" but not "Melayu Raya".

Point 6: Immigration

Control over immigration into any part of Malaysia from outside should rest with the Central Government but entry into North Borneo should also require the approval of the State Government. The Federal Government should not be able to veto the entry of persons into North Borneo for State Government purposes except on strictly security grounds. North Borneo should have unfettered control over the movements of persons other than those in Federal Government employ from other parts of Malaysia into North Borneo.

Point 7: Right of Secession

There should be no right to secede from the Federation

Point 8: Borneanisation

Borneanisation of the public service should proceed as quickly as possible.

Point 9: British Officers

Every effort should be made to encourage British Officers to remain in the public service until their places can be taken by suitably qualified people from North Borneo.

Point 10: Citizenship

The recommendation in paragraph 148(k) of the Report of the Cobbold Commission should govern the citizenship rights in the Federation of North Borneo subject to the following amendments:

a) sub-paragraph (i) should not contain the proviso as to five years residence

b) in order to tie up with our law, sub-paragraph (ii)(a) should read "7 out of 10 years" instead of "8 out of 10 years"

c) sub-paragraph (iii) should not contain any restriction tied to the citizenship of parents – a person born in North Borneo after Malaysia must be federal citizen.

Point 11: Tariffs and Finance

North Borneo should retain control of its own finance, development and tariff, and should have the right to work up its own taxation and to raise loans on its own credit.

Point 12: Special position of indigenous races

In principle the indigenous races of North Borneo should enjoy special rights analogous to those enjoyed by Malays in Malaya, but the present Malaya formula in this regard is not necessarily applicable in North Borneo.

Point 13: State Government

a) the Prime Minister should be elected by unofficial members of Legislative Council

b) There should be a proper Ministerial system in North Borneo.

Point 14: Transitional period

This should be seven years and during such period legislative power must be left with the State of North Borneo by the Constitution and not be merely delegated to the State Government by the Federal Government.

Point 15: Education

The existing educational system of North Borneo should be maintained and for this reason it should be under state control.

Point 16: Constitutional safeguards

No amendment modification or withdrawal of any special safeguard granted to North Borneo should be made by the Central Government without the positive concurrence of the Government of the State of North Borneo
The power of amending the Constitution of the State of North Borneo should belong exclusively to the people in the state.
(Note: The United Party, The Democratic Party and the Pasok Momogun Party considered that a three-fourths majority would be required in order to effect any amendment to the Federal and State Constitutions whereas the UNKO and USNO considered a two-thirds majority would be sufficient.)

Point 17: Representation in Federal Parliament

This should take account not only of the population of North Borneo but also of its size and potentialities and in any case should not be less than that of Singapore.

Point 18: Name of Head of State

Yang di-Pertua Negara.

Point 19: Name of State

Sabah.

Point 20: Land, Forests, Local Government, etc.

The provisions in the Constitution of the Federation in respect of the powers of the National Land Council should not apply in North Borneo. Likewise, the National Council for Local Government should not apply in North Borneo.

Tuesday 13 June 2023

当前这一代要实现MA63---安华

当前这一代要事实MA63---安华
马来亚以马来西亚联邦名义殖民沙砂两国从国阵巫统从1963年开始到今天,对MA63完全不尊重。

联邦政府换手了,希盟联邦政府还是想方设法掌控,耍赖,玩表面功夫。

60年后的今天,马联邦政府多少都被沙砂掐脖子,所以,下放一些。还是一样在言语上大作功夫。

就2023年财政预算案,总共资金是马币3881亿:
行政用途:2891亿
发展用途:990亿

三邦分配:
马来亚:869亿
沙巴: 65亿
砂拉越: 56亿

完全没有把沙砂当一回事。

只有特别拨款有从新启动拨马币3亿。这特别拨款在1970开始就停止了。好像只拨过一次。这笔账,有一天,还是要清算一下。

砂拉越31代表在前线完全对砂没有作用。连吭一声都没有。

砂政府活像傀儡,任由马联邦斩割。

今天,大家都很清楚马联邦是处处违宪,实际上是狐假虎威。根本不堪一击。

马联邦还是马联邦不间断掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫和霸凌沙砂两国后来送一点点礼。以前,更野蛮到还要沙砂两国感恩呢!

60年后的今天,有Chagos islands 提供参考和国际法的参照,沙砂政府其实有法定可以告联邦政府上国际法庭。

现在,球是在沙砂政府的脚下。沙砂人民必须团结一致向沙砂政府施压要回MA63协议的自主权权益。

只有除掉没作为的政府,改朝换代,尤其是砂政府,坐镇60年垄断政经。

现在,是时候沙砂人民要发挥自决权,去殖民化打救沙砂。

Monday 12 June 2023

JCFong MA63 is not legally binding under Malaysia laws

1. According to State Legal Advisor, JC Fong, the effect of the FC not recognising MA63 would mean that MA63 was not legally binding under Malaysian law.

2. The UN legal opinion (19/09/63) referred to Malayan UN Representative Dato Ong Yoke Lin's letter to the UN (16/09/63) as stating that there was no new federation created just a name change to Malaysia. The letter did not mention that 3 new members were admitted on 16/09/63.  

It was the British legal strategy to amend the FC to admit new SSS members to the Malayan federation to avoid having to apply for a new UN membership under a new entity "Malaysia". Thus the British gov't sough the UN Legal opinion on this point. The Opinion stated that the name change was not legally forming a new international legal entity and therefore did not require a fresh application to the UN to be a new member. 

This was done to avoid international opposition to Malaysia and hence it might not be admitted as a member.  

The second leg of the strategy was to avoid scrutiny of the Decolonisation "Committee of 24" which would require legal compliance with Principle IX (9) UN Resolution 1541 to hold a real referendum for a non-independent colonial territory to join an independent federation. This avoided holding a referendum on Malaysia. (As explained in declassified docx and the UK Colonial Secretary, Duncan Sandys' UN telegram to his London office on 09/08/63). 

Following the Manila Accord (signed 31 July 1963 after MA63 was signed). The British again avoided a referendum (publicly opposed by Malayan PM & Permanent Sec. Ghazali Shafie after prompting by Sandys) but instructed the UN secretary to carry out an assessment of the people's wishes on Malaysia (similar to the Cobbold Commission), not a referendum.        

Thus, the UN Secretary without need to put the matter to a Gen Assembly vote, endorsed the change of name.

3. MA63 as an international agreement and bound by international law, was not registered till 1970, 7 years after signing. 

What is the legal effect?

UN Charter Art 102 (a) & (b) require that all UN members must register their agreement immediately on signing & ratification. Failure to do so will incur the penalty of not being able to invoke the teary (MA63) by the signatory parties on any issue relating to the treaty. 

After 7 years, arguably MA63 (if valid) would in effect have lapsed for non-compliance with the UN Charter and MA63 Art 8 which required all parties to do all things necessary to implement the agreement. 

In other words, for 7 years MA63 neither Malaya, S'pore, Sabah nor Sarawak would not have been able to invoke MA63 in any domestic or international issue or dispute. 

Arguably from this point of view, MA63 was rendered not binding because it was not concluded according to international law rules and requirements. 

4. Was MA63 a legally signed document? The Borneo High Court avoided dealing with this issue recently. According to the international legal principle stated by the ICJ in the Chago case, a colonial power cannot make a binding agreement with colonies under its control, as they did not have the power to do so.   

It has been asserted since 2013, that MA63 was void ab initio and not legally binding from the beginning, The reason given was that SSS were colonies not sovereign states with power or legal capacity to make binding international agreements. The 2019 Chagos case confirmed this conclusion. 

The second part of your comment will be answered later.

Saturday 10 June 2023

安华:布城也不及

安华:布城也不及(诗华日报8/6/2023)

这是多么令人厌恶的客套话。首先他把砂拉越纳入马联邦13之一。布城到底拥有怎样的地位?这分明是要矮化砂拉越以满足霸权海盗盗匪自卑没自信的心理。

他说沙巴和砂拉越在1963年参组马联邦时是最贫穷的州。这简直是安华说,安华道,胡说8道。如果是,马来亚会想方设法逼迫沙砂参组马联邦吗?

砂天然资源无限丰富,怎么可能最贫穷呢?想骗谁?

当时,马来亚经济状况是频临破产,如果不是靠掠夺沙砂两地资源是随时必须宣布破产告终。

马来亚以马来西亚名义不间断在沙砂两地非法的掠夺其资源。这是全天下都见证的事实。

如果沙砂两国今天退出马联邦,马联邦下场就是马上马下破产。要不要试试看?

砂今天在绿色能源和氢气领域领先马来亚,那是真的。

天然资源无限丰富大大超越马来亚,也是真的。

除此之外,基本设施那一样比得上马来亚?

1. 道路交通系统简直是天差地别。
2. 卫生医疗服务和设备差距太大。医护人员总是不足,都是以马来亚医护人员为先。处处打压砂发展。
3. 常年发展拨款不足导致水电供应很不到位。
4. 残校砂是最最多。
5. 网络服务设备落后到,学子要爬树寻找讯号。
6. 砂教师缺3000不等。跟文莱和新加坡比一比,人家有面对如此不堪的情况吗?
7. 火车服务,60年,还见不到踪影。
8. 砂拉越,据报道是马联邦,排进13州之一是第三贫穷州。资源无限丰富,怎么这么贫穷?

尽灌砂政客鱼汤说他们有担当。砂拉越今天沦陷到这么不堪的地步是哪一种类的担当呢?

政客就是政客可以随意应景需求,颠倒是非,不分青红皂白,是非对错赞到底。

我还是我,老话一句:砂不脱马独立,永远落后贫穷。

The Sarawak Initiatives

Dear Sir/Mdm,

Catch us LIVE on The Sarawak Initiatives YouTube channel:-
"Sarawak: Self-determination and the Colonial Overlay" by Dr. Greg Poulgrain and moderated by Prof. Dr. James Chin on 21/6/2023 (Wednesday) at 8:00 pm.

Youtube Live_Infographic.jpg

The Speaker:
Greg Poulgrain is Adjunct Professor of History at the State University of Malang (UM, Indonesia) and Adjunct Fellow Law and Society at the University of the Sunshine Coast (USC Australia). He is the author of The Genesis of Konfrontasi - Malaysia, Brunei, Indonesia 1945-65 (SIRD, Kuala Lumpur, 2014)

Topic Summary:
Concerned that the truth “would have a bad effect on public opinion in Sarawak”, the Colonial Office (in the 1950s) resorted to Newspeak saying “the people of Sarawak shall be entrusted in due course with the governance of themselves.” The template for Malaysia was taking shape a decade before it was formed in 1963. Even though different political priorities emerged in the intervening decade – unrest in Singapore, the influence of Indonesia - they did not threaten the original plan but were used to embellish it. The deception culminated in Malaysian Confrontation. This presentation looks at how this was achieved, the benefits accrued and the problems that ensued.

How to watch the YouTube LIVE:
Click the link here to watch the LIVE stream: http://rb.gy/2lgbr 

Get notified for the LIVE by subscribing to our YouTube channel: http://youtube.com/channel/UCnhTONL31Ksn0Vd9cBQT17w

Do not miss out! Feel free to share the opportunity with your colleagues and friends. 

Thank you and best regards,

Filominna Richard
TSI Executive Secretary
Tel: +6019-876 7928

Friday 9 June 2023

回应砂总理。。6/6/2022的声明

新闻公告
肯雅兰全民党主席温利山
2022 年 6 月 9 日

有鉴于:回应砂拉越总理在 FMT(今日自由大馬) 2022 年 6 月 6 日的声明。

在此謹告知总理丹斯里阿邦佐哈里;如果砂拉越决定离开馬來西亞联邦,联邦和砂拉越宪法中没有规定禁止后者這么做。同时,砂拉越宪法并没有赋予总理权力来决定砂拉越和其人民之命运与是否应该永远留在马来西亚联邦。

总理的职務是根据宪法规定或法律授权管理砂拉越。总理必须明白,砂拉越并不只属于他个人的而是属于砂拉越全体人民的。即使联邦和砂拉越宪法禁止退出,但是如果人民选择退出并且满足某些情况,那么砂拉越退出马来西亚是无法被阻止的。如果新加坡可以退出马来西亚,同样的,如果砂拉越和沙巴人民选择这样做,那他们就没有理由不能退出。

愿总理获悉,肯雅兰全民党 采访的大多数人都想离开马来西亚。

总理需要提醒的是,1962 年有成千上万的砂拉越人在街头游行反对马来西亚计划。东姑阿都拉曼希望马来西亚在 1963 年 8 月 31 日马来亚独立日同时成立,但由于某些方面的反对而被迫成立将这个日期改为 1963 年 9 月 16 日。

沒有人应该否认砂拉越与马来亚联邦的合并是英国人“强加”于砂拉越人民的事实。解密文件显示,英国和东姑阿都拉曼之间曾秘密会面或计划将沙巴和砂拉越合并为马来亚的领土。许多反对马来西亚计划的人被捕并不得不逃往丛林并被贴上恐怖分子的烙印。他们在维护自己的权力和国家的权力时,怎么可能被贴上恐怖分子的标签?英国当时正在利用人民对本身权力的无知而进行操作。

人们反抗是因为马来西亚计划是强加给他们的。砂拉越政府,亚历山大·瓦德尔爵士(Sir Alexander Waddell)发出警告并说:“任何在 1963 年之前或过早地强制合并的企图很可能会导致砂拉越的种族冲突和彻底的叛乱”——见第 5 页 Michael Leigh 的Deals、Datus and Dayaks .

让所有砂拉越人民和总理知道;联合国大会第 1514 号决议具有宣言性质並根据国际法赋予殖民地自决的合法权利。既然是合法的权力,殖民霸主就无权阻止去殖民化。即使联邦和砂拉越宪法禁止退出,你也不能简单地忽视国际法规定的这项合法权力。自联合国大会于 1960 年 12 月 14 日通过联合国大会第 1514 号决议以来,联合国是希望看到所有殖民地能安全的脫离其殖民霸主而独立。

 英国尚未完成沙巴和砂拉越去殖民化的义务;将它们交给马来亚联邦并不意味着英国可以轻松脫手。

提醒马来西亚政府,当时菲律宾和印度尼西亚反对馬來亚联邦与沙巴和砂拉越合併之计划。菲律宾和印度尼西亚认为它违反了国际法之联合国大会第 1514 号决议规定的自决权。政治家、沙巴和砂拉越人民视东姑阿都拉曼精心策划合併沙巴和砂拉越以扩大马来亚的领土之计划是“政变”。


马来亚通过在 1963 年 7 月 9 日签署马来西亚协议和 1963 年 8 月 1 日发布科博德委员会报告意圖合併沙巴和砂拉越而导致边界对抗和马尼拉协议的签署。马尼拉对沙巴东部拥有主权索取之事尚未解决。

Thursday 8 June 2023

OMO Sarawak

Only Sarawak State government can repeal Oil Mining Ordinance, says Assistant Minister

KUALA LUMPUR (June 26): A Sarawak State Assistant Minister said today that only the Sarawak State government can repeal the Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958 because it was passed by its State Legislative Assembly.

As such, national oil company Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) is bound by the OMO, said Sarawak State government’s Assistant Minister for Law, state-federal relations and project monitoring Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali in her Facebook post today.

“[The OMO] is a valid law and will remain valid unless repealed by our State Legislative Assembly,” said Sharifah.


To recap, Petronas failed in its motion seeking leave for a declaration from the Federal Court that the formation of PDA 1974 implied that the OMO was repealed.

It also filed an application for leave to commence proceedings under Article 4 (4) of the Federal Constitution, seeking a declaration that the PDA 1974 applied with regard to the regulatory control of upstream activities in Sarawak.

In an earlier statement, Petronas said that the application was declined solely based on technical grounds and that the matter falls outside of the Federal Court’s jurisdiction.

“The Federal Court did not in any way determine or endorse the merits of the legal position taken by the Government of Sarawak to regulate upstream petroleum activity under its OMO 1958," said Petronas.

Sharifah however disagreed, noting that since the motion has been dismissed, the Sarawak State government can enforce the OMO against Petronas, pointing to how the State government can gain revenues from licences, leases or permits imposed on all players including Petronas.

The provisions under the OMO “are not inconsistent with the Petroleum Development Act (PDA) 1974”, she said.

“Section 3 of OMO makes it an offence for any person who is found to be exploring, prospecting or mining petroleum or natural gas upon any land in Sarawak without any lawful authority to do so under any provisions of the OMO.

“Section 4 of OMO sets out types of licences or lease that a person may apply,” she said, adding that therefore Petronas is bound by the OMO and has to comply with the provisions in carrying out any oil and gas (O&G) exploration, prospecting and mining activities both on- and offshore Sarawak.

“Also by virtue of our Sarawak Land Code, State Land is defined to include the bed of any river, stream, lake or watercourse and also the foreshore and beds of the sea within the boundaries of Sarawak,” Sharifah added.

That, she said, means that any person occupying Sarawak State land for upstream activities is “required to have the authority under the Land Code” or by a license issued under OMO.

“The State Government has decided to enforce our laws to the full extent,” Sharifah added. “Petronas can still bring the matter to the High Court, but let us be mindful that no laws can be declared so simply as invalid. If I were Petronas, I would not do that.”

Petronas goes to court.... Sarawak's oil and gas claim

Petronas goes to court over Sarawak’s O&G authority claim

This article first appeared in The Edge Financial Daily on June 5, 2018

KUALA LUMPUR: Petroliam Nasional Bhd (Petronas) is challenging the Sarawak government’s claim to regulatory authority in the upstream oil and gas (O&G) sector. The national oil company is taking the question to the Federal Court via an application filed yesterday.

At the heart of the matter is whether the extraction of petroleum resources requires mining leases from the state government

While the state had repeatedly said it has regulatory authority over such activities, Petronas is now asserting it does not need such approvals from the state to undertake upstream O&G activities in Sarawak.

In a statement yesterday, Petronas said it is seeking a declaration from the apex court that the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA) is the law applicable for the nation’s petroleum industry. The company is also seeking a declaration that it is the exclusive owner of petroleum resources in the country as well as the only regulator of upstream activities nationwide, including in Sarawak.

“The court filing is done to seek and clarify Petronas’ role as the custodian of the nation’s oil and gas resources and not an act of suing the Sarawak state government,” said Petronas. “We remain committed to support Sarawak’s aspiration to participate in the oil and gas industry in the state, for as long as it is within the framework of the PDA.”

The application names the Sarawak government as the respondent. The state’s Attorney-General’s Chambers confirmed that it has been served with a notice from the Federal Court Registry.

“At the moment, the state has yet to receive the motion filed by Petronas related to the application,” State Assistant Minister in the Chief Minister’s Department for Law, State-Federal Relations and Project Monitoring Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali said in a statement.

“The state government will do everything within its powers, in accordance with the rule of law, to defend our rights in this matter,” she added.

In April, Sarawak Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Abang Openg said companies operating in the upstream O&G sector in Sarawak must obtain the necessary licences and leases from the state beginning July 1.

Malaysia. That interpretation would mean the Sarawak state government could no longer consider itself the authority under the ordinance, Petronas wrote.

Petronas asserted that the PDA had, in any case, superseded the ordinance. Petronas’ application to the Federal Court includes a declaration that the Oil Mining Ordinance was impliedly repealed by the PDA.

Petronas in its application also expressed concerns that the state government may interfere with the operations of its subsidiaries and contractors. The concerns include its worry that production sharing contractors may face uncertainty as to whom to deal with in respect of regulatory approval.

Additionally, Petronas raised the worry that the state government may revoke work permits of non-Sarawakian workers in upstream activities or refuse to renew the permits upon expiry.

Petros was incorporated in July 2017. In August 2017, Abang Johari reportedly said Petros will enable Sarawak to actively participate in O&G extraction activities in the state while actively pursuing its quest for a 20% royalty from Petronas.

At present, the federal and state governments are entitled to a 5% royalty each as stipulated in the PDA. Increasing the rate to 20% would entail amending the PDA via Parliament.

The state’s quest for a higher royalty began with Abang Johari’s predecessor Tan Sri Adenan Satem back in 2014. Adenan had taken over as chief minister in 2014 and oversaw a landmark motion to ask for a 20% oil royalty passed in the state assembly later that year.

The motion had been mooted by state opposition. Adenan passed away in January 2017.

 

砂资源Vs砂地税

砂资源Vs砂地税
砂拉越有超级多的资源。就石油据最保守估计是85万桶。何只!然而咱们砂人还要面对用贵石油成品。还要面对种种税务压力。

看看汶莱一天才出产10万桶石油,几乎没有还什么税。根本没有所谓的土地税。

再看看人家阿联酋7国中的Dubai 一天才出产65万桶油,人民丰衣足食以外,更是享受高级的生活水准。

反观咱们砂拉越应有尽有,却要还让人喘不过气的城郊区和城市区的地税,期限60年。
每英亩地马币:
农业地:200
城郊地:2500
城市地:5000

突然,砂政府,完全不顾民意,自作主张把很多诗巫西岸的农业地更改为城郊地,地费大暴涨达12倍多。

古晋石角,农业地更暴涨20倍多。可是,跟人民严重脱节的天然资源和城市发展部长Tengah Ali 却说这是合理的。跟汶莱和阿联酋7国完全不征收土地税对比一下,什么叫合理?

我不反对象征性的征收一些土地税以供土地局员工们的薪水和行政管理费。那里像现有的政策,就想着在人民身上榨取。

砂拉越超级丰富资源,不是每个砂百姓都有份吗?

这已经做了二,三十年的部长都大捞特劳捞得盘满钵满,也太自我为中心了。站在部长的高度,完全不顾民生。

60年的政治经济垄断已经严重制造贫富差距两极化。财富几乎都掌控在政治集团这些顶级的政客们的手中。

扎希:联邦与砂和谐合作。。更大进步繁荣

扎希:联邦与砂和谐合作 砂人享受更大进步繁荣

他这些话是会激怒无限砂人。我们倒认为马来亚没有沙砂老早就破产告终了。他还敢来砂说大话。

在60年前,马联邦以巫统为主,承诺给沙砂进步繁荣还是停留在空中。

今天,这巫统主席应该不知无耻为何物吧!他竟敢重复这些话。

看,不参组马联邦的汶莱是真的进步繁荣了。从马联邦退出的新加坡更是进步繁荣,而且已经是个先进国。

反观,沙砂60年是不间断的被掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫和霸凌。

马来亚假借马联邦的名义光明正大的来抢夺沙砂资源去发展马来亚,导致沙砂沦落到今天落后不堪的地步。

一条泛婆罗洲大道到今天已60年还没建成。

各种基本设施非常不足。全沙砂道路网水准低落。

水电供应很不到位。医疗服务不理想和设备很不足,常常需要社会人士捐赠。残校沙砂最最多。互联网服务差,有学子要爬上树去上网,等等等等。

马联邦每年从砂掠夺两,三千亿税收,回馈的连6% 都不到,说什么废话跟马联邦合作可享更进步繁荣。我看他的良心早就被狗吃了。

我倒认为脱马独立才是进步繁荣唯一的出路。

Wednesday 7 June 2023

砂医疗执行权

Hasidah: 马联邦必须授砂政府执行权以纠正医护缺点

砂拉越总理属(法律,MA63, 邦-联邦)副部长Hasidah 认为砂的卫生部必须减少砂和马来亚医疗覆盖率,可达性,品质和安全的差距。

她认为马联邦必须授执行权给砂卫生部处理健康医疗体系那些缺点。

砂议会人民代表实施志豪附议砂政府有提供马联邦参考和建议方案以提高和升级砂医疗服务以让砂全民获益。

马联邦宪章80(4)确实有明文规定授权和义务。

还有联邦宪法80(5)他们有必要提供资金让砂政府提供行政安排像设置维护,人力资源,医院和诊所设备等等等等以让全砂百姓获益。

Tuesday 6 June 2023

Razaleigh exposes Dr M wasteful economic management

RAZALEIGH EXPOSES MAHATHIR'S WASTEFUL ECONOMIC MANAGEMENT

Comment Peter Terence D'Cruz 

Tun M wasted more than RM529 billion of Petronas money since 1970, saving Mirzan & Mokhzani's losses - Tengku Razaleigh

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah yesterday claimed that the former 4th and 7th PM, Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad had caused the country's petroleum giant, Petronas, to lose more than RM500 billion since 1979.

The shocking revelation was shared by FB user Peter Terence D'Cruz yesterday afternoon.

March 21, 2023

The founding chairman of Petronas and its first CEO, Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah said that the federal government in Putrajaya under Mahathir has been treating the oil and gas corporation as a cash cow, especially in bailing out government-linked companies in financial trouble.

Petronas provided the money to build some of former Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamed's most grandiose projects, including the KL Twin Towers, the Putra Jaya administrative capital and to bring Formula One racing in Malaysia.

Petronas was used to get Malaysia out of an RM31.5 billion forex scandal perpetrated by Mahathir in the early 1990s in which the financier George Soros outfoxed Bank Negara, making billions and earning Mahathir's eternal antagonism. It paid off US$800 million in losses from Mahathir's ill-fated Perwaja Steel project. In 1998, it bailed out Mahathir's eldest son Mirzan, purchasing his Shipping Consortium for RM226 million and assuming debts of more than RM324 million. It also awarded in 2012 a RM700 contract to a firm in which Mahathir's other son Mokhzani was a vice president.

Tengku Razaleigh, or Ku Li, said that since its inception in 1974, Petronas has paid out RM529 billion to the government in the form of dividends, taxes, petroleum revenue and export duties.

He also said the government's reliance on Petronas to rescue financially floundering government-linked companies (GLCs) had been going on since 1985.
Ku Li was the Minister of Finance from 1974 to 1984.

In 1985, Petronas bailed out Bank Bumiputra with a Rm2.5 billion infusion. In 1991, Petronas shored up the banks' finances again when it pumped in an additional RM1 billion.

In 1997, he said Petronas had to rescue the troubled Konsortium Perkapalan Berhad for RM2 billion.

He added that Petronas was made to underwrite the construction of the KLCC Twin Towers for RM6 billion and the construction of Putrajaya for a further RM22 billion.

"This amount could have been used more productively to fund a national pension program for Malaysians, as has been done by a certain Scandinavian country," he said in his speech at the launch of the book "Rich Malaysia, Poor Malaysians" at the Sultan Sulaiman Club in Kuala Lumpur last night.

The bailout and construction of mega projects was done during the premiership of Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad, who initiated a series of major infrastructure ventures in the 1990s.

Ku Li said the exorbitant amount of the bailout and construction of these projects that was forced onto Petronas had also deprived the company of the much needed cash build-up for reinvestment, which would ensure its business sustainability.

He said today Petronas was on par with oil majors and was ranked as one of Fortune 500's largest and most profitable oil and gas companies.

"But sadly, it is being abused and treated as the piggy bank whenever the government needs cash in a hurry," he said.
Ku Li said while subsidizing consumer goods was not the most efficient of ways in managing the high cost of living, it was fairly understandable if the government extended a helping hand to the little man.

"What is sinful and cannot be forgiven is the ease with which the powers that be had been dishing out subsidies to such entities like the national power supplier, the independent power producers and some other non-power outfits," he said.

During the last few months of Mahathir's second stint as prime minister, he tried to look at possible ways Petronas could raise funds. One of his ideas was to break up Petronas into smaller business units, the Petronas Chemicals Group, Petronas Carigali, and Petronas Gas, selling equity off to Sabah and Sarawak state governments.

With tourism, air transport, and logistics depressed, national governments, including Malaysia will have to go deeper into deficit financing to pump their respective economies.

This is a dilemma for Petronas which will be under extreme pressure to pay some form of dividend to help the government manage the upcoming budget. Without help from Petronas, the finance minister will have to canvass a reintroduction of the GST, maybe even at a higher rate than previously, increases of income and corporate tax, and even the introduction of new taxes. The company has been a major contributor to Malaysia's wealth. However, times are changing where it may not be a dependable lifeline for much longer.

Can law enforcement officers... roadblocks?

Can law enforcement officers stop and search your car without setting up a roadblock?

Posted by Voon Lee Shan
Voonslegal Community 
6 June, 2023

When enforcement authorities like the police, customs, immigration department wants to do something (like stop and search someone, or enter into a private residence), they can only do so if the law permits. If there is no law allowing it, they would be acting beyond their powers – basically acting illegally. They could be sued for trespass and assault.

So with regards to police searching vehicles, there actually is a law on the matter. Following Section 24(1)(b) of the Police Act 1984:

“Any police officer may—
…stop and search without warrant any vehicle or vessel which he has reasonable grounds for suspecting is being used in the commission of any offence against any law in force…”

Therefore it’s quite safe to say that the police can legally search your car, but they must have reasons to suspect that your car was involved in a crime. So for example if the PDRM received information that a black Honda Civic was the get away car in a robbery and you drive a black Honda Civic, they may have legit grounds to search your car. 

If you are stopped, then, this basically means that, it’s best to ask the officers why they are searching your car. 
Do take note of their particulars including their names which you could see from the name tag on his uniform besides the car they used when you are stopped by them. 

But, it is not wise to travel alone in car and you may need to equip yourself with a hidden body camera to do some recordings in the event things go nasty.

Sarawak oil and gas ---lost forever?

SARAWAK’S OIL & GAS – LOST FOREVER? 

By Yusuf Abdul Rahman  

It is important for Sarawakians to realise that the main reason behind the proposal for the formation of Malaysia was in fact the Oil & Gas resources and wealth that was greedily coveted by the UMNo Malayans, who under Tunku Abdul Rahman had realised that Malaya’s economy after Independence would remain precarious without a new source of wealth, especially since most of the tin mines and rubber estates were still under British and Chinese control. 

Greg Poulgrain, a historian has noted from his study of previously classified British government documents that the primary impetus for forming Malaysia was oil, not ethnicity. 

This is why the Malayans were never really bothered about implementing the terms of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) as fully as they should have, especially once they had gotten their dirty hands on Sarawak’s Oil & Gas (Sabah’s as well, of course) – mission accomplished. 

MA63 was in fact silent about Sarawak’s Oil & Gas resources, which rightfully are inalienable assets of the state and not the federation, like all other natural resources such as forests and other minerals. 

It all started while the negotiations for independence were proceeding between Malaya and the British. The British since as early as 1953 had also started plans in motion for its “grand design” to merge all of their five colonial possessions in South East Asia into some form of “British SouthEast Asia Dominion”. Malaya was aware of this “grand design”, but the Borneo territories were not. 

According to an opinion article in the Daily Express dated 16th February 2020, "...As for the oil in Sarawak territory, the British were prepared to surrender that to the new federation under control of Malaya. Sir Anthony Abell, then Governor of Sarawak, in April 1956 observed in a communication to the Colonial Office that “the politicians in both Malaya and Singapore were showing considerable interest in the Borneo territories “including its empty spaces, its potential wealth, and its oil”.

This was even before Malayan independence. 

The British kept Sarawakians & Sabahans blissfully unaware of this considerable interest by the Malayans and the Singaporeans.   

While the Sarawak delegation may not have been aware of the negotiations going on behind the scenes between Malaya and Brunei prior to MA63, it is clear from historical records that the Malayans insisted from the start that Brunei’s oil revenues would pass to the federal government after 10 years. 

Negotiations failed when the Bruneians (the Sultan of Brunei in particular) did not want to give away their oil revenues, the main source of Brunei’s wealth.  

The Malayans therefore kept completely silent about Oil & Gas in their negotiations with Sarawak & Sabah, fully intending to take Sarawak & Sabah by surprise, which they did, since the “Development of mineral resources, mines, mining, minerals and mineral ores, oils and oilfields; purchase, sale, import and export of minerals and mineral ores; petroleum products; regulation of labour and safety in mines and oilfields;” was already provided in the Item 8 (j) of the Federal List, 9th Schedule of the Constitution of the Federation Malaya 1957. 

Sarawak & Sabah unfortunately did not give any importance to this nor even raise any query, since the entire negotiations were stage-managed by the British and the Malayans. To the deceptive British & Malayans, of course, silence meant consent. 

This is partly why MA63 is actually null and void, being signed by Britain & Malaya & purported Sarawak “representatives” while Sarawak was still a colony, following the Chagos case opinion by the ICJ. 

By 1966, the Malayans had enacted the Petroleum Mining Act 1966, which under section 1 (2) “shall apply throughout Malaysia but in its application to Sabah and Sarawak it shall have effect only with respect to off- shore land”. This Act was supposed to come into operation on 8th November 1969 with regard to Sarawak and Sabah. 

Why only off-shore land? Because by 1955 Shell had already started marine seismic surveys and in 1957 had relinquished 75% of its land lease. Initial drilling in the Temana field had also hit first oil in 1962. 

Earlier in July 1966, the Malayans had already enacted the Continental Shelf Act 1966, whereby they illegally and unconstitutionally took over the Continental Shelf that rightfully belonged to Sarawak. This gave the Malayans “all rights with respect to the exploration of the continental shelf and the exploitation of its natural resources are hereby vested in Malaysia and shall be exercisable by the Federal Government”. 

To do this, they first had to get rid of Singapore and secondly, Ningkan, who by 1965 was becoming a critic of the Malayanisation policy that had supplanted what was supposed to be Borneonisation. The Malayans never really wanted Singapore in the first place, nor did they really want Sarawak & Sabah either, only Sarawak & Sabah’s Oil & Gas. 

After 1966, the Malayan-controlled federal government started collecting the royalties that were paid by Shell Sarawak, which incidentally, at 10% and later 12.5%, were more than double what Sarawak was to get later from Petronas for more than 56 years. 

This was still not enough for the Malayan-controlled federal government and by the 1970s they started to seriously think about following the Pertamina (Indonesia) production-sharing model, to do which the illegal and unconstitutional Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA74) was enacted that vested the entire ownership of all petroleum resources within Malaysia with Petronas. 

So finally in 1976, Sarawak and Sabah thus “lost” complete ownership of our Oil & Gas, even if it was done illegally and unconstitutionally. Neither Sarawak nor Sabah have ever challenged PDA74 in court.  

In this way, instead of 10-12.5% as previously, Sarawak received a cash payment of 5% (based on crude oil or raw gas prices). The other 5% went to the federal government, who as the sole shareholder of Petronas, also got additional returns in the form of dividends and corporate tax, petroleum income tax and export duties. Altogether Petronas/the federal government received 92% of total net petroleum revenues, with approximately 6.5-7% going to the petroleum contractors such as Shell, leaving 1-1.5% to Sarawak. 

Has all been lost forever, or is it still possible for Sarawak to claw back the ownership of its own Oil & Gas resources from Malayan control and domination? 

That is a question that can only be answered by the people and the government of Sarawak. 

Clawing back our property from the hands of thieves is not easy and they will of course resist to the bitter end. 

The Sarawak government has made a good start with the formation of Petros and the imposition of SST on petroleum products. Revenue derived from petroleum products alone according to Sarawak Premier has reached RM8.52 billion todate, a significant amount, in view of the fact that the Federal budget still doesn’t give Sarawak a commensurate share based on Sarawak’s contribution to the national economy via our Oil & Gas revenues. 

The Federal government seems to think Petronas is the golden goose, when it is in fact Sarawak (and also Sabah). Yet they don’t feed the golden goose properly while stealing all the eggs. 

The Sarawak govt and Petros have taken the correct step of regaining control of Sarawak’s onshore petroleum assets. Next must be regaining full  
control of Sarawak’s offshore petroleum assets, while Oil & Gas still remain relevant and while we develop new sources of renewable energy. 

We are still talking here of potential revenues to Sarawak amounting not to tens of billions of ringgit but hundreds of billions of ringgit that can raise the living standards of all Sarawakians, especially those that have so far been marginalised and have not had proper access to development and socio-economic opportunities for advancement. 

Between 1976 and 2017, the value of crude Oil and raw Gas production exceeded 660 billion ringgit, out of which Sarawak only saw 33 billion ringgit in royalty, amounting to an average of 805 million ringgit per year. 

By now, the figure should have reached more than 1 trillion ringgit, with value added from processing of about 2 trillion ringgit, just from Sarawak alone. This is what Sarawak has lost over the last 46 years.  

It is largely from Sarawak’s Oil & Gas revenues that the Malayans have managed to siphon off 1.9 trillion ringgit into offshore bank accounts, as revealed by the Pandora Papers. This is another subject that they will not allow to be debated in Parliament. 

In trying to claw back as much Oil & Gas revenue as possible, through value added processing, Sarawak has now embarked on various initiatives involving setting up of various petrochemical and other refining plants to be able to process and utilise our own Oil & Gas resources for value added instead of being sold cheaply for fast cash, as is now being done by Petronas.  

We need to enhance our domestic gas distribution facilities so that Sarawakians can also enjoy cheaper energy that we now supply overseas and subsidise in Malaya. Malaya has more than 2,000 km of natural gas pipelines and Sarawak less than 50 km. Gas subsidy to Malayan power plants, industries and consumers alone has already amounted to more than 200 billion ringgit, while Sarawak gets zero. 

In order to get the full benefit of our own Oil & Gas resources, we need to regain full control and ownership of them from Petronas and Malaya. To do this we need to strengthen our regulatory capabilities and we need the political will to be tough with the Malayans, instead of constantly being pushed around and taken for a ride on our own Oil & Gas resources. 

As we can see, this has been a very expensive ride that has cost us at least a couple of trillion ringgit all this while, if we had developed our own Oil & Gas resources. We just cannot afford to be taken for a ride by the Malayans any more. They have been thinking of themselves all this while, and taken us for granted, even calling us their fixed deposit.  

No more. It is now more than high time for Sarawakians to think about ourselves and our own people. 

Or else, our Oil & Gas will truly be lost forever. 

Yusuf Abdul Rahman Kuching 23rd July 2022