The same old question

The old questions never answered but sweeping under the carpet. Malaysia Agreement 1963 never honoured and it's contents never implemented,. Petroleum Development Act 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 passed during Malaysia Emergency period and they are no longer valid since Najib removed emergency during his time as Prime Minister of Malaysia making all laws and Acts passed during emergency null and void.

Who Owns The Continental Shelf in Sarawak?

Sarawak OR Malaya. 

Prime Minister Anwar's Office said the Territorial Sea Act 2012(TSA2012) is still valid and applicable throughout Malaysia. 

BUT

The Sarawak govt said the Territorial Sea Act 2012(TSA2012) is inconsequential and Sarawak's continental shelf rights is maintained at 200 nautical miles from the coast. 

In fact it should be 350 nautical miles(648.2km) under Article 76 of UNCLOS 1982.

On April 25, 2024, the Terengganu State Assembly unanimously passed a motion to reject TSA2012. Will Negara Sarawak's Legislative Assembly do the same?

With this statement by PM Anwar, the Sarawak Government MUST clarify Sarawak's position once and for all. What is Fadillah Yusof doing?

https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2022/05/19/sarawak-will-not-compromise-on-its-rights-says-abang-jo/

https://www.thestar.com.my/news/nation/2024/04/27/territorial-seas-act-still-valid-in-force-nationwide-including-t039ganu-says-pmo

SSSNeither form nor join Malaysia

NEITHER FORM NOR JOIN MALAYSIA!

Hello my Brother Datuk, I respectfully say Sabah and Sarawak never joined Malaysia and Sabah and Sarawak also did not form Malaysia. 

Sabah and Sarawak together with Singapore were acquired or annexed by Malaya by way of fraud or by a stroke of a pen by having been misled to sign the Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63).

 I agree with many experts that there was a collusion between the United Kingdom with Malaya to make Sabah and Sarawak together with Singapore at that time, to become territories of Malaya. 

The Greater Malaya or Malaysia Plan was the most despicable act by the British and Malaya working with hands in gloves to deprive Sabah and Sarawak their rights to seek independence by taking advantage of illiteracy and ignorance of the people of Sabah and Sarawak at that time of their right to seek independence by way of self-determination under United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514(UNGAR 1514).

I would humbly say the Cobbold Commission Report was a fraud and was tailored to ensure it could be used as an instrument to draft the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). 

Members of the Cobbold Commission were from interested parties to see the Malaysia Plan would be realised. None of the members of the Cobbold Commission were from Sabah and Sarawak. How could a voice of just 4000 odd people could represent the people of Borneo Territories of over a million people at that time to say the people of Sabah and Sarawak 

agreed to Malaysia? 

None of the members of the Cobbold Commission were able to speak any native language and none could understand Sarawak Malay dialect. Who amongst the natives could speak and understand English at that time when called by the Cobbold Commission? If I could read correctly from materials I had, Tunku rubbed his hands on what should be mentioned or written in the Cobbold Commission Report - please see books written by Prof Michael Leigh.

The British government's commissioned study on "The Making of Malaysia by AJ Stockwell" disclosed colonial documents showing that the so-called formation of Malaysia was a pre-determined political arrangement by the UK and Malaya. I humbly repeat it was all in breach of UN laws on the right to self-determination under Resolution 1514 and 1541. 

Neither North Borneo nor Sarawak had any role in the "forming of Malaysia" nor was Malaysia formed or created as a new state as claimed! 

We should not continue to fool our own people because all of us will be answerable to God later. We should be sad that we have lost our country and we should grief to see our people perished because of ignorance or lack of knowledge. Our people perished because their lives and livelihoods had been affected by neo-colonialism.  

The people of North Borneo (Sabah) and Sarawak were not represented by their own elected representatives from the beginning but by the British governor representing the British Crown in negotiating the MA63 terms.  

This was because both Sabah and Sarawak were still colonies and non-self-governing territories as defined by UNGAR 1541. They were not represented and participated as states in equal standing with the UK and Malaya in the negotiations. 

If so, why is it claimed that Sarawak became independent on 22 July 1963 not 09 July 1963 when MA63 was signed?

Further, if they were independent, then the UK would absolutely have no role to play in the making of Malaysia! Thus for this reason MA63 was null and void ab initio. In the Chagos Islands case, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in February 2019 advised that colonies have no legal capacity to make treaties with parent countries.

On its face, MA63 had the legal absurdity of the UK government negotiating with its colonial office to transfer Sabah and Sarawak to Malaya. 

What actually happened was that the UK government secretly agreed with Malaya that the Malaysia Plan was to transfer Sabah and Sarawak to Malaya (according to MA63) without giving self-government or independence to the two colonies. This was publicly confirmed by The British Colonial secretary on 31 Aug 1963. 

Further, on 16 Sept 1963, Malayan UN representative Dato Ong Yoke Lin stated in a letter to the UN Secretary that no new nation was created, just the renaming of the Malayan federation as Malaysia with the addition of three new territories (under MA63). International legal experts had advised that Malaysia was not formed in accordance with international law. The current political situation is that people are not happy because the consider Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya or at least been treated as colonies of Malaya. It is a rule of colonialism that colonial masters are entitled to take the resources of their colonies. Therefore, there are increasing numbers of Sabahans and Sarawakians are not happy of the loss of marine wealth, sea territories and oil and gas resources taken by or to develop Malaya

Even if MA63 was valid at the time it was signed, we all know that fundamental breaches of the Treaty had caused the Treaty itself to collapse. Furthermore, when Singapore exited from the federation, the Treaty itself collapsed.

I also wish to respectfully say what the statement "form Malaysia" implies, was that this was a mutual and voluntary association. 

However, I respectfully say this was far from the truth, as MA63 was signed under coercive emergency conditions with ongoing fighting against nationalist forces. 

This meant the conditions were not such that the people were free to agree or disagree with MA63. In fact, thousands of people were arrested in Sarawak and detained for allegedly opposing Malaysia. They have a legal right to defend their lives.

I wish to say that under international law, it is legitimate to fight back when the people are denied real independence. It is also part of the international law that citizens of a country is entitled to defend their country against foreign aggressions and interference in the internal affairs of their country.

The British-Malayan Malaysia Plan constituted an outside interference with their inalienable right to freely decide their future. The British in reality assisted the Malayans to occupy or invade Sabah and Sarawak.

A treaty made under such conditions and without even a referendum cannot be said to be valid.

The public especially DUN Members should educate themselves on the incontrovertible historic factors.

Yours sincerely and respectfully, 

Voon Lee Shan

29 April 2024

Concentration Camp in Sarawak from 1962

MALAYSIA A BUTTRESS OF FREEDOM

THOUSANDS OF PEOPLE WERE IMPRISONED IN CONCENTRATION CAMPS FOR ALLEGED OPPOSITION TO MALAYSIA FROM 1962 

The first video entitled "Detention Camp Kuching 1966" shows Dr Ismail Abdul Rahman, Head of the Special Branch and later the Malayan Home Minister inspecting the detention camp at the 6th Mile Rock Road, Kuching Sarawak. 

The detention or concentration camp is a symbol of Malayan colonialism and suppression of the Sarawak people's right to independence from foreign rule.

The arrest and detention of thousands of people suspected of opposing Malaysia was often arbitrary and those arrested were never tried in open court, so the new colonial rulers did not have to prove they were guilty. Some were detained for over 25 years.

The video by Mariam Mokhtar sums up the fraud of Malaysia as expressed by the ordinary Sabah and Sarawak people.

The video "Reasons Why Sabah and Sarawak are not keen to be part of Malaysia anymore" expresses the people's anger over the Federal violations and removal of their rights and entitlements guaranteed by the Malaysia Agreement 1963.

The new colonial rulers of Sabah and Sarawak know that one day like all other colonised people, the Sabah and Sarawak people wil one day free themselves from Malayan foreign rule.

The photo shows speakers of the Melbourne Saya Anak Bangsa Malaysia forum on "Is Malaysia the Buttress of Freedom in Asia?" in 2017.

https://www.facebook.com/conan.drum.56/posts/pfbid0CrHD1cCVJiS8Kg3uVqCfKZ49aax8UHpPKfPbiGGUBpP6WAkDnivmm6XQ4qwz1j8ml

邱宏友：拿回主权自己掌控

借题发挥

邱宏友：非靠争取索求，砂拿回主权自己掌控

我完全认同邱氏的看法，马来亚违宪的在1976把砂降格为州。是的，从此明目张胆的掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫，霸凌和殖民砂拉越。

是的，砂也因此经济及基本设施远远落后马来亚和其他国家。砂甚至沦落成马来西亚赤贫州属之一。我很肯定的说这一切跟马来西亚联邦脱不了关系。

1963年9月16日，砂拉越，沙巴和新加坡在英国霸权主义和主意的强硬安排下跟已经独立的马来亚签署MA63而成立马来西亚联邦。

据我所知，马来亚就更名为马来西亚。连向联合国申请一个新联邦国成立都掩盖了。

1965年8月9日，新加坡退出宣布独立。这已足够盖定MA63无效。

是的，MA63前后被修改600多次，面目全非。MA63还算合法吗？

我完全同意砂人民权益砂政府应该全权掌控管理。

砂政府决定去州正名砂拉越立法议会是好事。

是啊！接下来，砂政府是否会调正砂旗及歌？

还有砂政府如何处理砂人民身份证的13？还有，还有砂是否用自家的护照？还有，还有，还有,所有砂权益，咱们自主吗？ 真的伤脑筋！

对，我们都有注意到砂权益是有逐步复原 

如论如何，SLM 民运会到砂各个角落，向各阶层做醒觉运动让人民知道砂的立场和未来方向。

我的和我的国家

*我和我的國家：1963 年馬來西亞協議*

（ *温利山* 25-04-2024）

 洗腦是一種非常強大的技術，可以讓人們相信謊言是真理。

 我們需要明白，我們的人民因無知而滅亡。 他們傾向於相信不時重複的宣傳。 他們對真理的無知導致他們失去了生命和國家。

 這是聯邦黨人的論壇。 他們相信馬來西亞聯邦，無論如何、無論發生什麼，聯邦都應該完好無損。

 他們會告訴您 1963 年馬來西亞協議（MA63）是有效的，或者好像 MA63 是有效的並且必須遵守。 你會很高興聽到這個，並且你認為一切對沙巴和砂拉越都有好處。

 到目前為止，除了 PBK 以及沙巴和澳洲的一些民族主義者和律師之外，沒有人敢說 MA63 是一項無效的初始條約。 即使在條約簽署時有效，一旦違反條約的基本條款，條約也將失效。 根據條約的基本原則，一旦作為該條約締約國的新加坡退出馬來西亞聯邦，MA63條約就會自動失效。

 我被 MACC 和警方傳喚要求陳述，事實上，我因 MA63 事件而被捕，我赤身裸體地躺在他們面前。 如果我所說的不是事實或不正確，我早就陷入麻煩並因我們的立場而在法庭上受到指控。

  這些聯邦黨人都不會告訴沙巴人和砂勞越人，MA63確實是一個無效的條約，或者不再是一個可以根據法律得到遵守的條約。

 在對他們所說的內容妄下結論之前，請務必謹慎思考。 他們是院士、學識淵博的律師、資深政治家和公眾人物，但這並不意味著他們是對的。

 請記住，沙巴和砂勞越為了加入馬來西亞聯邦而失去了太多。 自1974年石油發展法令通過以抽走我們的石油和天然氣以來，估計沙巴每年損失不少於900億令吉，而砂拉越因國家石油公司開採的石油資源而損失不少於1100億令吉。 沙巴和砂勞越過去每年回饋的發展基金總是少於50億令吉。

 這樣公平嗎？ 我們是傻子嗎？

 除此之外，我們政府部門徵收的大部分收入或稅收都被帶到布城，其中大部分是用於發展馬來亞。

 我們不是馬來亞的政治奴隸嗎？

 請注意，根據聯合國秘書處的說法，馬來西亞並不是一個新國家。 馬來西亞是馬來亞的新名稱。

 一些馬來亞政客甚至稱我們為「Tanah Melayu」。

 他們的動機是什麼？

 

 温利山

 肯雅蘭全民黨主席

 2024 年 4 月 25 日

砂拉越去州

有话直说

沈桂贤：砂今后不称州

总理如副首相

副总理沈说砂今后不称州了；砂总理相等于副首相。嗯。。嗯为什么不相等于新加坡的总理呢？怪胎！

2/2022年砂拉越宪法修正后，砂首席部长改名为砂总理。砂拉越在马来西亚联邦地位有明显的提升了。是吗？

联邦发展拨款照旧很低跟马半岛对比之下，区区几%然而马来亚却是86%多。

嗯。。嗯办开斋节民间活动场地也命名为Dewan Undangan Sarawak ，排在Sarawak 之前的Negeri 也去除掉了。

副总理沈说每个砂人似乎这一微妙动作就会造就重大改变。嗯。。嗯，有意思。

他说前首相慕尤丁修宪后也以Wilayah代替Negeri 了来合法化自己说辞。

因此，副总理沈呼吁砂民间和官方都一起保持改口不再称砂拉越多加了州字眼。就是画蛇不添足！记得砂拉越就是堂堂正正的一个未独立的国家。

1976年违宪把沙砂贬成州至2021年。

今后正名的事肯定咱们自家要坚持立场。

砂火箭头YB张健仁认为砂要正名必须在联邦议会修宪。

已经复邦了, 还不够力吗？

如果有必要在联邦再来个正名，也应该是站在最前端31位MPs尤其是YB张健仁 （中选5届）或YB张庆信（中选6届）和其他29位MPs的事。怎么可以推给砂政府呢？

砂政府是最后一道防线。除非前线都倒了，才轮到后线，对吗？

Merging of parties in Sarawak

PETALING JAYA: Major parties in Sarawak’s ruling coalition would oppose any merger of the Progressive Democratic Party and Parti Rakyat Sarawak that would result in a united Dayak front, according to political analysts.

James Chin of the University of Tasmania said Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu and the Sarawak United People’s Party would oppose any such merger, to maintain their dominant positions in the state.

“The merger will never happen. The biggest reason is PBB and SUPP don’t want to see a united Dayak front as they do not want the Dayak community to challenge their supreme status in Sarawak,” Chin told FMT.

Chin was commenting on a suggestion by Julau MP Larry Sng of a potential merger between PDP and PRS.

Sng said he believed it would strengthen the ruling coalition, Gabungan Parti Sarawak, “and the Dayak cause” while PBB vice-president Abdul Karim Rahman Hamzah later said the proposal was a good idea if GPS’s leaders could reach a consensus.

PBB, the dominant partner of GPS, is composed of a Bumiputera wing and a Pesaka wing for Dayaks, but the party leader has been a Malay since October 1975.

GPS, which comprises PBB, SUPP, PDP, and PRS, currently holds 79 out of the 82 seats in the state assembly.

Chin added that a PDP-PRS merger would also face opposition from their own members as it would trigger a fight over the presidential position.

He said PDP president Tiong King Sing, a federal minister, would not relinquish his position easily, while PRS, which is led by Joseph Salang Gandum, would be averse to having a non-Dayak leader.

Although PRS stands as a multiracial party, it places particular emphasis on the development of the Dayak-Iban community.

Chin also said a faction of the Dayak community would reject the merger proposal, as Dayak leaders may have fewer opportunities for political progress while at present Dayak politicians have the chance to climb the political ladder through SUPP, PDP, PRS, and PBB.

“If their choices would be reduced through this merger, a lot of the minority Dayak community, such as Bidayuh and Orang Ulu, would not be in favour,” he added.

#sarawak #Politics #Dayak #Iban #OrangUlu

Rajah的9项治理原则

解读Rajah 的9项治理原则

1. 砂拉越是砂拉越人的。

2. 透过教育和经济发展改善砂民的生活水平。

3. 砂民人人平等，绝不允许特权剥削砂人或受保护的人。

4. 保障正义和有规范合理的自由。

5. 文笔言论表达和宗教自由。

6. 完全依赖人民善意合作的公务员就是公仆。

7. 公共服务是以公务员的品德绩效做考核。

8. 自治是砂民的终极目标；透过教育让砂民实践政治管理的义务，责任和特权。

9. 以往和现在的统治者都期待砂各种族和谐幸福生活在一起。未来继承者以及所有公仆都必须遵守这9项治国原则。

It is, no doubt, ridiculous of Uggah, the GPS YB to say that giving material aid to school, they need approval from the Ministry of Education/MoE.

As far as I know, each GPS YB is given RM3 million for Rural Transformation Projects and RM5 million for Rural Minor Projects.  

If they are not able to give material aid at will to help schools, then what for to be given so much.

What purpose does this MoE serve if it fails to facilitate schools in good deeds.

Do Sarawakians think that it is time to flush out the political thugs who fail to deliver?

砂启动沿海政策

为了航运业发展

砂重启沿海贸易政策。

不让外国货船到砂直接靠岸御货，砂重启沿海贸易政策，到底是符合那一门的逻辑？

咱们砂人所用的货物大都是来自中国。中国货船自接来砂靠岸下货进自家港口货仓库，既省钱又方便。

为了满足航运业主的需求，牺牲了无数人民的福祉合情合理吗， 砂交通部长李？

船运费从巴生港口由砂货船转运来砂：从外国货船到巴生港口下货，进货库；到又上货到砂货船这些费用，到底是航运业者或砂百姓承担呢？我希望砂交通部长李给砂民一个符合逻辑的讲解。

It's ridiculous of Uggah

It is, no doubt, ridiculous of Uggah, the GPS YB to say that giving material aid to school, they need approval from the Ministry of Education/MoE.

As far as I know, each GPS YB is given RM3 million for Rural Transformation Projects and RM5 million for Rural Minor Projects.  

If they are not able to give material aid at will to help schools, then what for to be given so much.

What purpose does this MoE serve if it fails to facilitate schools in good deeds.

Do Sarawakians think that it is time to flush out the political thugs who fail to deliver?

知识就是力量

知识就是力量

Petroniaga 有限公司耗逾5000万吸纳

Petroniaga 有限公司进行投资5000多万加强供应商网络，提升存储能力，注入兑换煤气桶和强化物流管理。

Petroniaga 有布局65名经销商和280名次经销商供应网络。

对于MyGaz停止营业后其属下的经/次经销商或零售商几乎都过度进Petroniaga 而非砂火箭林财耀所言失业。

原本3个月才能达标的黄兑换红桶，就在短短3週就换了16.5万桶。其实，煤气桶兑换没有设时限。却在政客特意耍弄下，模糊不清，再加上人民本身无知，因此造成这模样的慌张。

大家包挂我对客服热线操作不习惯，所以，不知如何是好。

据报道Bintango有经销商卖RM29.00 Sarikei RM29.60说泗民成本高卖贵，这非事实因为Petroniaga 已经吸纳所有成本。

火箭队上议员黄秀励是否认同泗民商家的解释？

要求35%而已

沙砂傀儡政府只要求35%的联邦席位分配，却让全沙砂人看到博士进发黄和Merdeka 民调主任的原来还是把沙砂当马联邦13州之一。

联邦席位分配和拨款，如果都是以A+H+K的总人数而不是以各邦国为单位的人口来计算，那么HK永远人只能任A斩割，只有A邦国享受进步和繁荣。

以AHK总人数划分选区的所谓‘公平’分配席位和拨款，永远造成到HK不公平。

今天沙砂（HK）基本设施非常落后是被参组马联邦后的诅咒。

A（马来亚）11州分明就是利益共同体。

HK跟A隔离千多哩根本是违反自然联合条件是时候准备脱马独立去了。

请各方参考Paragraph 236(a)(i) of Cobbold Commission.

65: 35

有话直说 1/1/24

目前联邦席位分配必须是A 65%：HK 35%。这是沙砂傀儡政府最低要求。

这就必须减A议席；加HK以保持65%：35%。

沙砂人民真正要的是各三分之一，否则脱马独立去，向新加坡看齐。绝对是正确的。

请参考Cobbold Commission Report: Paragraph 236(a)(i) 幅员和潜能也必须是考量席位分配。

给沙砂35%，让他们决定怎么分配。

说砂席位从31增加到43,会促成该政党做大，不知道这些博士专家们是用哪一门的逻辑思维模式。

A邦国专家们恐慌的是A国无法任性尽情掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫，霸凌和殖民沙砂吧！

一面唱KAH/AHK三国联邦平等伙伴关系；一面专干‘挂羊头卖狗肉’的丑恶行径了吧！

The 9 cardinal Principles

英国王公统治的九项基本原则[1]

1. 砂拉越是我们臣民的遗产，并由我们自己为他们保管。

2. 发展和改善社会和教育服务，稳步提高砂拉越人民的生活水平。

3. 绝不允许任何人或个人获得与本国人民不一致的权利，或以任何方式允许任何人剥削我们的臣民或那些寻求我们保护和照顾的人。

4. 正义应可自由获得，Rajah和每一位公务员应易于向公众诉说。

5. 应允许和鼓励言论和书面表达自由，每个人都有权随心所欲地进行礼拜。

6. 公务员应永远记住，他们只是人民的公仆，他们完全依赖人民的善意和合作。

7. 只要我们的臣民，无论种族或信仰如何，都应自由和公正地进入我们的服务机构，他们的教育、能力和品德使其有资格履行职责。

8. 始终牢记自治目标，适时委托砂拉越人民进行自我治理，并不断努力通过教育他们加速实现这一目标公民的义务、责任和特权。

9. 我们的前任和我们自己的总政策，即使国家各族裔能够幸福和谐地生活在一起，我们的继任者和我们的仆人以及所有可能追随他们的人都应遵守。

NINE CARDINAL PRINCIPLES OF THE RULE OF THE ENGLISH RAJAH[1]

1. That Sarawak is the heritage of Our Subjects and is held in trust by Ourselves for them.

2. That social and education services shall be developed and improved and the standard of living of the people of Sarawak shall steadily be raised.

3. That never shall any person or persons be granted rights inconsistent with those of the people of this country or be in any way permitted to exploit Our Subjects or those who have sought Our protection and care.

4. That justice shall be freely obtainable and that the Rajah and every public servant shall be easily accessible to the public.

5. That freedom of expression both in speech and in writing shall be permitted and encouraged and that everyone shall be entitled to worship as he pleases.

6.That public servants shall ever remember that they are but the servants of the people on whose goodwill and co-operation they are entirely dependent.

7. That so far as may be Our Subjects of whatever race or creed shall be freely and impartially admitted to offices in Our Service, the duties of which they may be qualified by their education, ability and integrity duly to discharge.

8. That the goal of self-government shall always be kept in mind, that the people of Sarawak shall be entrusted in due course with the governance of themselves, and that continuous efforts shall be made to hasten the reaching of this goal by educating them in the obligations, the responsibilities, and the privileges of citizenship.

9. That the general policy of Our predecessors and Ourselves whereby the various races of the State have been enabled to live in happiness and harmony together shall be adhered to by Our successors and Our servants and all who may follow them hereafter.

李光耀回忆录

李光耀回憶录，第一章，开头就这样寫着；

“....新加坡的独立卻是强加在它头上的....”,話雖是这么說，然而李光耀巧妙的運用一係例策略与动作，还有他的高尚品德致使他不曾和砂沙首长一样同汚合流，高喊'Ya betul, ya betul'，所以今天新加坡才不在马联邦懷抱之中，其实不会令人惊奇的。

李光耀回忆录第一章第十六段，“在我们和敦拉扎克进行談判三个星期里.....”

第八段 “特地要求東姑

在声明上亲自簽名，......他们无法改变主意。”

从这两段話，我们得知，独立並非一蹴而就，而是经过艰难的暗中談判，还有李光耀的去意已决，坚持要独立的決心就表現出他特地要求東姑在声明中亲自簽名，以免后者日后生变反悔。在这过程中，新马双方同意于1965年8月7日签署分离协议致使新加坡同年8月9日宣布独立並终止为马联邦的成员国。

同年8月9日，上午十点正，新加坡广播电台广播员庄严地讀出独立宣言，与此同时，政府也分發特别宪報号外让人民知道新加坡已经脱馬独立了。另一边廂，正在此時，馬联邦国会还在辩論新国方案，时至下午四点半才对外宣布新加坡被踢出联邦。人家新加坡早早就遠走高飞，轻舟已过万重山，馬来亚才来一个马后炮，說前者被踢出联邦，这样本未倒置的說詞合逻輯嗎？令人伩服嗎？

时至今日，新加坡是否被踢，大家細讀李光耀回忆錄之后自可思考判断。转载

Why JPA for medical graduate placement?

Why JPA for medical graduates’ placement?

The whole scenario, no doubt, looks ridiculous and grotesque when the application of medical graduates has to be decided by the Public Services Department/JPA.

Being inefficient, insensitive, ignorant and bureaucratic, JPA creates such a mess that it has caused such a drop of medical graduates entering housemanship as it is frustrasting and depressing to wait for 6-9 months for the placement.

Meanwhile, many enter other lines of job and get attached. Based on the report, the number of medical graduates entering housemanship declined from 6136 in 2019 to 5113 in 2020; 3245 in 2022 and 3271 in 2023.  

According to Sarawak SUPP Dudong branch advisor Datuk Dr Soon Choon Teck, the management board of local hospitals like the practices in UK, Australia, New Zealand and Singapore should be given the autonomy to do the hiring or firing of medical staff.

Dr Soon who had the experiences of convenience when his application was approved by the State director of medical services at that time in view of the hassle the medical graduates are facing now and the acute shortage of housemen and medical officers in Sarawak sees the urgency of healthcare autonomy to us.

Federal funds for road maintenance

Truth and Fact 

Nearly RM200 million in federal funds for road maintenance in Sarawak – Nanta (6/2/24 BP)

It is RM200 million in total since last year. The budget for road maintenance in 2023 is RM2.7 billion and budget for the purpose in 2024 is RM2.8 billion.  

So, the total fedral budget for road repair since last year is RM5.5 RM billion. 1 billion = 1000 million and the total budget in million is RM5,500 million. 

Since last year, Sarawak only got RM200 million out of RM 5,500 million.  

In %, it is only RM 200 X 100% divided by RM 5000 = 3.6%. I don’t think that Sabah is any better.

Thus, about 90% or more, the federal budget for road maintenance for 2023 and 2024 is allocated in Malaya (with the new name Peninsular Malaysia).

Our federal works minister, Alexander Nanta accepts this amount lamely without any protest. He fools us to believe that we are given so much RM200 million since 2023 without telling Sarawakians out of the total of RM5,500 million.

He even told us there is an increase in the allocation for road maintenance in Sarawak.  

All in all, I think that we, Sarawakians must be in wide-awareness how our Sarawak federal YBs have cheated us all the time. Isn’t it the time to decolonise Sarawak for a change for good?

派来砂的新老师

从去年至3月份 -- 2577新手教师派砂

砂部长桂贤沈似乎对2577新手老师派砂来这事乐开怀，是裂嘴而笑。又是被马来亚占大大便宜，部长沈管不了。在2577名派砂的教师中多少%是砂民，他在乎吗？

天天喊叫砂教育自主权，砂优先，有在2577派砂的教师中实践了吗？ 

砂教师：马来亚教师%/比率是否是继续走向90% :10%.

联邦政府就是马来亚政府的狼子野心意在殖民砂拉越会放松吗？ 

砂政盟真的是以砂优先，有看家本事要回砂多少%的教育自主权？ 现在紧迫在眼前的行政权聘请自家砂教师这权力还是高高挂在高空中。实践教育自主权，落实还是遥遥无期等待中，who cares?

看到YB沈裂嘴而笑，联邦副教育部长家和黄满足的样子，尽在不言中，又一次轻松收割。砂人还是砂人，总是无感，静静的。

砂人何时才会苏醒尽现本色；砂人原有的特色：S4S。

2026年砂第13届选举，砂人会好好发挥联合国在1963年12月14日【去殖民化的宣言】的1514号决议案赋予人类的自决权和1541号的集体的决定权来裁决砂未来吗？ 还是继续让同一批政客继续玩下去呢？（11/3/24）

红桶煤气供不应求

红桶煤气短缺，是在Petros 预料之外。他们预料黄桶有500,000 桶，可是Petros 万万没想到是大大超越他们的预算。

目前，我不知道Petros 有多少红桶已经在市场流动。我也不知道向谁询问？砂立法议员好像也没有头绪。

无论如何，我相信煤气管衔接砂每个家庭在未来7-8年期间会完成。

现在，大家还是买几个电磁炉来应付需求。

我本身没有用煤气大概有十年了吧！我觉得电磁炉更适合我。

用煤气炉或电磁炉是习惯的问题。

有人说用电磁炉会增加电费。我不知道会增加多少电费跟煤气对比之下？到目前为止，没有数据为准，谁也讲不准。

记得，不要囤煤气桶，因为有一天，你要卖出去，就要亏本卖，信不信由你。

三选一

三选一求突破

Muda选择不参与国盟巡演绝对是正确的决定。 是的，Muda 应该继续扮演第三势力角色才有未来。

国盟组装回教化，自我为中心，根本没有顾虑非回教徒，沙砂人感受，切！

希盟标榜公正和改革，根本没有多少决心和毅力修正和改善体制。

权力到手后，还是跟着跟巫统国阵的模型模式运作。

要突破2选1这僵局, 咱们人民必须有3选1的机会。所以，对马来亚人来讲，Muda 才是最最佳选择。

参考台湾第3势力--公众党怎样破除2选1僵局。这才是开始迈向真正民主的大道。

大家加油⛽！

YB的承诺Vs联邦政府的决定

YB们的承诺Vs联邦政府的决定

YB 林承诺争取在诗巫建立一座癌症中心，结果，联邦政府只愿意在诗巫医院增设癌症部门。YB林是否有建癌症中心的提案和坚持立场诗巫急需癌症中心应付中区大概有90万的人口。

记得上一回2018年联邦选举，YB林承诺在诗巫医院建一座800万的多层停车场，后来希盟狂胜，结果只建了50个停车位。

副卫生部长，砂人，Lukanisman只会叩头, 被动的接受联邦政府决定。联邦所给的理由，是令人愤怒的，说医药管理涉及庞大开销，砂不适合全面接管，这是哪一门的logic？

以我看是联邦从砂征收的税金两，三千亿令吉不愿意合理的回馈给咱们。每次联邦医疗拨款，只给砂少过5%。

我可以结论一下YB林代表火箭，YB程和YB Lukanisman 代表砂政盟都是被动无能，欣然接受联邦政府安排，退而求其次。任由联邦政府摆布，完全没有坚持砂优先立场。

YB程说索权要求20亿拨款，砂加15亿来规划医疗，推广和提升医疗系统。 又是做亏本和愚蠢的事，咱们福州话说zo buangnu di zaiye.

联邦政府或马来亚政府处处打压砂拉越。诗巫建癌症和心脏中心是要寄望在未来，不知道要等到什么时候。

我认为争取教育和医疗自主权，唯一的途径是上法庭求公道去。如果无效就上国际法庭，脱马独立，砂民必须有1514和1541的意愿来裁定砂未来。

20324

SMK Sebuyau

Fact & Truth -- My comment on:

SMK Sebuyau still in sorry state despite new site approved 10 yrs ago

According to the Minister of Utility and Communication, Sarawak, …. Julaihi, several building including a multi-purpose hall were in dilapidated and unstable conditions 

In his facebook posting, he appealed federal Ministry of Education/MoE for immediate attention and speeding up the construction of a new block

I wonder who parliamentary member in the said constituency is. He has not performed his task at all from the fact and truth of the conditions of SMK Sebuyau.

I am rest-assured to say that the said federal YB’s hands and legs must have been tied up by his self-interest and official position.

The GPS government, well, has never been serious enough to exercise the power to demand for the task to be accomplished or sue the federal government in court.

Instead of having the meals in the hall, the boarding students use their meals at open spaces. So do the cooks preparing the meal in improper place.  

Julaihi, has allocated RM500,000 for a new multi-purpose hall for the school and it was approved by federal MoE about 10 years ago. Isn’t it ridiculous to seek approval of federal MoE despite using Sarawak own fund for the building?

It is no doubt depressing and disheartening to hear that other buildings of SMK Sebuyau are also in dilapidated and unsafe conditions. They have no choice but use them.

I wonder whether the Facebook posting of Julaihi to call upon the immediate attention and action of federal MoE would be entertained or not.

联邦教育局或自家的问题？

副总理Datuk Amar Douglas Uggah Embas）关切地看到，由于繁文缛节，难以为州选区武吉沙班的学校提供物质援助。

“我意识到，作为民选代表，我们现在需要首先获得教育部的同意。我们不能只是根据要求向学校提供我们承诺的任何援助。”

Uggah说，他最近按照这里一所学校的要求购买了一些空调设备用于其大厅，但直到交付六个月后还未安装。

“当我问为什么时，我被告知这是因为（教育）部尚未批准安装它们。我也被告知要写信给该部门，寻求其批准提供帮助，”他感叹道。

他说，这导致人们认为他没有履行帮助学校的承诺。

“并不是说我们违背了承诺，而是我们的双手被束缚了，”他说。

不过，乌加表示，他将就此事寻求州教育办公室的澄清

我的看法

这完全是自家领袖的问题。学校单位没有主见和立场。把Uggah 买来的空调在学校大礼堂安装上去，犯了那一条联邦宪法？ 说没有获得联邦教育局的批准是安装不得，这是什么鬼话！

跟个个首相和高官们贪污舞弊滥权对比一下，这连一粒沙子都不是，我不知道这学校的校长的思维是否有问题。

还有Uggah, 也乘机把援助的事推得一干二净：“并不是说我们违背了承诺，而是我们的双手被束缚了，”他说。

咱们砂拉越诸多残校就是因为砂议会议员和砂联邦议员不管是GPS的或反对派政党都是完全没有真心诚意的为砂民谋福利，以砂优先。

砂政府是时候换班了吧！

16、2、24

联邦教育局或自家的问题？

联邦教育局或自家的问题？

副总理Datuk Amar Douglas Uggah Embas）关切地看到，由于繁文缛节，难以为州选区武吉沙班的学校提供物质援助。

“我意识到，作为民选代表，我们现在需要首先获得教育部的同意。我们不能只是根据要求向学校提供我们承诺的任何援助。”

Uggah说，他最近按照这里一所学校的要求购买了一些空调设备用于其大厅，但直到交付六个月后还未安装。

“当我问为什么时，我被告知这是因为（教育）部尚未批准安装它们。我也被告知要写信给该部门，寻求其批准提供帮助，”他感叹道。

他说，这导致人们认为他没有履行帮助学校的承诺。

“并不是说我们违背了承诺，而是我们的双手被束缚了，”他说。

不过，乌加表示，他将就此事寻求州教育办公室的澄清

我的看法

这完全是自家领袖的问题。学校单位没有主见和立场。把Uggah 买来的空调在学校大礼堂安装上去，犯了那一条联邦宪法？ 说没有获得联邦教育局的批准是安装不得，这是什么鬼话！

跟个个首相和高官们贪污舞弊滥权对比一下，这连一粒沙子都不是，我不知道这学校的校长的思维是否有问题。

还有Uggah, 也乘机把援助的事推得一干二净：“并不是说我们违背了承诺，而是我们的双手被束缚了，”他说。

咱们砂拉越诸多残校就是因为砂议会议员和砂联邦议员不管是GPS的或反对派政党都是完全没有真心诚意的为砂民谋福利，以砂优先。

砂政府是时候换班了吧！

16、2、24

How to exit from the federation of Malaysia

How to exit from the federation of Malaysia by peaceful means – Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK) Plan

I had been advised by many legal experts that there is a right to Sarawak and Sabah to seek independence from the Federation of Malaysia by peaceful and legal means. This right was mentioned by Lord Lansdowne, the Chairman of the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) during the formation of Malaysia. United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 (UNGAR 1514) also mentioned the right of self-determination by colonies which can lead to independence. There is no prohibition in the federal and state constitutions to exit from the federation of Malaysia. 

Legal experts also opined that Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63) signed on 9 July 1963 used to form the federation of Malaysia was null and void or even if valid, the fundamental breaches of MA63 had led the Agreement void.  

The position of Sarawak and Sabah (SS) in Malaysia is unique and there are a few strategies to set SS free and independent from the federation of Malaysia if the people of Sarawak and Sabah are willing to follow PBK Plan to exit. Many experts opined that Sarawak and Sabah are colonies of Malaya. Malaya took a new name, MALAYSIA, after Sabah Sarawak and Singapore were acquired to enlarge Malaya. 

The strategies that PBK has in mind are as follows:

1. Follow Singapore strategy under PAP. PAP was the government of Singapore in 1965 and LKY then created political tensions with Malayaa by Malaysian Malaysia issue. This forced Tunku Abdul Rahman or Malaya to sit at the table to trash the differences with Singapore on Malaysian Malaysia issue. The matter could not be resolved and Singapore then declared herself independent from Malaysia on 9 August, 1965 to become an independent and sovereign state.

We must capture the state government first because the high court already made it clear only the state government can move or deal matters in connection with MA63 to court. The court also made it clear that the issues about the formation of Malaysia and MA63 could or should be brought in parliament by the state government. 

If PBK forms the state government, PBK will bring the issues concerning the formation of Malaysia and all problems arising and concerning the illegality of the MA63 to the federal government. A dateline must be set to resolve the differences to resolve all differences about MA63. PBK would likely demand terms to be resolved within the timeline. Once dateline passed, PBK may like what Singapore did, just declare independence through the Dewan Undangan Negri (DUN) but before this is done, PBK government may stir the matter to get people support. If 70%-80% Sarawakians and Sabahans want independence, what can Malaya do? 

This would be like a referendum and is good for purpose of UN General Assembly Resolution 1514.

This is people’s power

We can also move motions in parliament to remove provisions concerning Malay supremacy. This would be in line with what Singapore campaigned for that led to Singapore Exit from Malaysia. 

2. File in court to declare MA63 void. If the court declares that MA63 is null and void, Sarawak and Sabah should be allowed to leave the federation of Malaysia.

3. File suit in United Kingdom (UK) to declare MA63 a fraud and claim damages- see how HINDRAF did for Malaysian Indians. Although HINDRAF failed to get what they wanted but the case how HINDRAF took the matter to UK court is worth exploring. To say that UK court may not have the jurisdiction to hear the application to declare MA63 as a fraud should be strongly disputed because MA63 was signed in UK and if fraud is argued there should not be barred from limitation of time to file the suit in UK court.

4. Persuade at least two nations that are sympathetic to our problems and or countries that are not in good terms with UK and Malaya to speak about the neo-colonization of Sarawak and Sabah and defects of formation of Malaysia with view to refer the issues to United Nations International Court of Justice (ICJ) to declare MA63 null and void or to declare Malaysia was a fraud. Maybe we get a member nation of United Nations to sponsor the suit before ICJ like how South Africa did for Palestine against Israel recently. 

5. Bring the matter to United Nations Human Rights Commission (UNHRC) to tell the world the federal constitution is discriminatory and or not protecting the minorities etc. See the case of Sandra Lovelace v. Canada, Communication No. R.6/24, U.N. Doc. Supp. No. 40 (A/36/40) at 166 (1981) an Indian in Canada who brought her matter to UNHRC. It was also about issues of discrimination against Sandra Lovelace and also land rights caused by her marriage to an non-indian.

If UNHCR opined that the federal constitution is discriminatory against the minorities of Sarawak and Sabah, the Sarawak and Sabah governments have to pursue the matter in parliament and also to the court to get the relevant discriminatory provisions in the federal constitution removed. If the discriminatory provisions not removed, this could be good reason for Sarawak and Sabah to exit peacefully from the federation.

 

For Malaysia, a law professor whom I consulted, told me Malaya would not be able to amend the constitution against race, Religion and Royalty (3R issues). Once the constitution is not amended to remove the discrimination against minorities, the people of Sarawak and Sabah should decide whether to exit from the federation of Malaysia. If exit is favoured this could, perhaps, be done by Unilateral Declaration of Independence (UDI) in the Dewan Undangan Negeri. 

Voon Lee Shan

16 March 2024

Zahid's land corporation

*Anwar quietly approved this proposal to rob off the wealth of the hard working citizen especially the Chinese to be given freely to Bumi*

Zahid's land corporation proposal is insidious, unfeasible.

P Gunasegaram in Malaysiakini - Mar 7, 2024

https://www.malaysiakini.com/columns/698505

COMMENT | One proposal announced by no less than Deputy Prime Minister Ahmad Zahid Hamidi went relatively unnoticed at the recently concluded Bumiputera Economic Congress (BEC), where a slew of proposals for helping well-off bumiputera was unveiled.

It could be the most insidious and the one that is most patently unfair to other Malaysian citizens from whom part of their land would be taken away upon the renewal or even extension of leases.

According to Zahid, who is also the rural and regional development minister, the government plans to set up a Bumiputera Land Corporation (Perbadanan Tanah Bumiputera) to preserve land ownership, as part of an effort to strengthen the community by boosting its land ownership.

According to a report quoting Zahid, if the lease size exceeds 50 acres (20.23ha) for agricultural land or 20 acres for industrial use, the proposal calls for 20 percent of the land to be handed back to the government upon lease renewal or extension.

“The creation of a Bumiputera Land Corporation would signify a proactive measure aimed at ensuring a balanced racial demographic, sustaining bumiputera businesses in agriculture, industry, and new settlements, and preserving bumiputera ownership,” he said.

Zahid envisaged that the returned portion of land would be then overseen by the corporation.

“I am confident that this initiative holds the potential to yield substantial returns and significant opportunities for bumiputera to possess a stake in the nation's land assets,” he added.

Tremendous implications

One hopes that this badly conceived scheme is still at the proposal stage and will not see the light of day. The implications are tremendous. Note that all agricultural land above 50 acres will come under this and 20 acres for industrial land.

If you had a small plantation of 50 acres growing oil palm for instance, and if you were non-bumiputera (I’m assuming this stipulation does not apply to bumiputera companies) you have to give up 10 acres upon lease renewal or even a mere extension.

That means you will lose too the yearly output that you get because the area planted will be reduced by 10 acres. The amount of fresh fruit bunches decreases by 20 percent and so will your revenue. Profit may decrease even more than that because of loss of economies of scale.

Let’s say down the road you have an oil palm mill, logistics centre and office premises amounting to 20 acres, you suddenly have to carve out four acres for allocation to the Bumiputera Land Corporation.

Presumably, the corporation will hand it over to a privileged bumiputera who can then sell it back to the original lessor for a huge premium. What a quick and easy way to make money and for the government to hand out patronage to its own people.

It beats even approved permits and rivals that infamous 30 percent bumiputera equity stipulation.

Something like this could only have been conceived by an Umno minister who will have the necessary audacity, the sense of entitlement and the complete lack of ethical behaviour to suggest such a one-sided deal.

Imagine the kind of havoc it will cause - factories, offices, plantations, food production etc. Right now, almost all leases are automatically renewed on the payment of a premium and business continuity is assured.

Let’s take Malaysia’s largest plantation - Sime Darby - which has an estimated planted acreage of 730,000 acres in Malaysia. Sime Darby may not be considered a bumiputera company because of its diverse shareholders.

That would mean that it will eventually have to give up 20 percent of its plantations in Malaysia or 146,000 acres. Using a very conservative estimate of RM10,000 per acre, that alone is worth RM1.46 billion. Potentially, billions of ringgit of properties are involved across all businesses.

The result of this ill-considered move to surrender 20 percent of larger tracts of land upon lease renewal or extension is a huge business disruption and the abuse of allocation of land to privileged bumiputera, two things we really don’t need.

Unless strictly necessary, leases are not normally terminated or withdrawn. This practice ensures fairness to all landowners and assurance that businesses of all kinds have reasonable certainty that they can operate in a system which is fair, equitable and reasonable.

Why, the move could be even against the Federal Constitution that stipulates that everyone is treated equally under the law. It implies that people cannot have their property taken away through any process and then redistributed to others.

Zahid’s proposal should be nixed in the bud forthwith before it becomes a needless contentious and divisive issue.

P GUNASEGARAM says proposals should be vetted for fairness and feasibility before they are made public.

评论 | 副首相艾哈迈德·扎希德·哈米迪宣布的一项提案在最近结束的土著经济大会（BEC）上相对未被注意到，会上公布了一系列帮助富裕土著的提案。

这可能是最阴险的，对其他马来西亚公民来说也是最不公平的，他们的部分土地将在续签甚至延长租约时被剥夺。

兼任乡村及区域发展部长的阿末扎希表示，政府计划成立土著土地公司（Perbadanan Tanah Bumiputera）来保护土地所有权，作为通过提高土地所有权来加强社区的努力的一部分。

根据扎希德的报道，如果农业用地的租赁面积超过50英亩（20.23公顷）或工业用地超过20英亩，该提案要求在续租或延期时将20%的土地交还给政府。

他说：“土著土地公司的成立将意味着一项积极主动的措施，旨在确保种族人口平衡，维持土著在农业、工业和新定居点的业务，并维护土著所有权。”

阿末扎希设想，归还的部分土地将由该公司监管。

他补充说：“我相信，这项举措有可能带来丰厚的回报，并为土著拥有持有国家土地资产的重要机会。”

巨大的影响

人们希望这一构思糟糕的计划仍处于提案阶段，不会出现。 其影响是巨大的。 请注意，所有 50 英亩以上的农业用地都将归入此范围，20 英亩的工业用地将归入此范围。

例如，如果您有一个占地 50 英亩的小种植园，种植油棕，并且如果您是非土著（我假设此规定不适用于土著公司），您必须在续租时放弃 10 英亩，甚至仅仅放弃 扩大。

这意味着您也将损失您获得的年产量，因为种植面积将减少 10 英亩。 新鲜果串的数量减少了 20%，您的收入也会减少。 由于规模经济的损失，利润可能会下降得更多。

假设在路上你有一个油棕加工厂、物流中心和办公场所，占地 20 英亩，你突然必须划出 4 英亩分配给土著土地公司。

据推测，该公司会将其交给享有特权的土著，然后土著可以以巨额溢价将其卖回给原始出租人。 这是一种多么快捷简单的赚钱方式，也是政府向本国人民提供资助的方式。

它甚至击败了已批准的许可证和竞争对手臭名昭著的 30% 土著股权规定。

只有巫统部长才能构想出这样的事情，他必须有必要的胆识、权利感和完全缺乏道德行为来提出这样一项单方面的协议。

想象一下它将造成什么样的破坏——工厂、办公室、种植园、食品生产等。目前，几乎所有租约都会在支付溢价后自动续签，并且业务连续性得到保证。

以马来西亚最大的种植园——森那美（Sime Darby）为例，该种植园在马来西亚的种植面积估计为 730,000 英亩。 由于股东多元化，森那美可能不被视为土著公司。

这意味着它最终将不得不放弃马来西亚 20% 的种植园，即 146,000 英亩。 以每英亩 10,000 令吉的非常保守估计，仅此一项就价值 14.6 亿令吉。 所有业务都可能涉及数十亿令吉的财产。

这种在续租或延期时交出 20% 大片土地的考虑不周的举措，其结果是造成巨大的商业混乱，并滥用土地分配给享有特权的土著，这是我们真正不需要的两件事。

除非绝对必要，否则租约通常不会终止或撤销。 这种做法确保了对所有土地所有者的公平，并保证各类企业有合理的确定性，他们可以在公平、公正和合理的体系中运营。

为什么，此举甚至可能违反联邦宪法，该宪法规定每个人在法律下受到平等对待。 这意味着人们不能通过任何程序夺走自己的财产，然后重新分配给他人。

阿末扎希的提议应该在它成为不必要的争议和分裂问题之前立即被扼杀在萌芽状态。

P GUNASEGARAM 表示，提案在公开之前应经过公平性和可行性审查。

The endless lies of Gaza

Why Die for Lies ..

THE ENDLESS LIES OF GAZA 🧵

We have been lied to. This is the message that goes all across of the Arab world suddenly after October 7th events and the war between Israel and Hamas in Gaza.

🔴Suddenly we discovered the Gaza, which is inhabited by 2 million people, has 36 hospitals. There are Arab countries with 30 million citizens and do not have this number of hospitals.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that Gaza was getting water, electricity, gas and fuel for free from Israel. Of course, there is no Arab citizen who does not pay water, electricity and fuel bills.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that Gaza was receiving 530 million a month from Qatar alone, and 120 million a month from UNRWA and 50 million a month from the European Union and S30 million a month from America. There are Arab countries drowning in debt and cannot find anyone to help them, even with 51 million.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that Gaza was not besieged and all goods were entering it as we foreigners and people of foreign nationalities. Its residents were travelling to Egypt and from there to the rest of the world, and there's many examples for that.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that Gaza was living better than many Arab countries and its people were living better than many Arab peoples.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that our minds were besieged by a propaganda lie about what is going on in Gaza.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that the children in Gaza are not children as we usually think, but children of terrorists with machine guns and suicide belts who underwent special training by Hamas.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that the schools, hospitals and mosque in Gaza are organized by terror headquarters and ammunition warehouse with Hamas underground tunnels.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that in Gaza there is an underground metro of Hamas that stretches for 500 kilometers, which Israel can only invade.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that the supposedly doctors and teachers in Gaza turned out to be active Hamas terrorists.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that rockets and mortars are kept in children's rooms in Gaza homes.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that Hitler and his book Mein Kampf were very popular in Gaza and its translation into Arabic was in almost every home in Gaza or a portrait of the author.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that the Gazans live a life of luxury with multi-storey mansions with swimming pool and premium German cars.

Suddenly we discovered that there is no Israeli siege on Gaza because it still borders its Muslim sister Egypt.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that most of the citizens in Gaza support Hamas and other terrorist groups, elected Hamas in democratic elections and celebrated the massacres on October 7th.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that what is called journalists in Gaza who work for Western media like CNN, AP, Reuters and other turned out to be Hamas terrorists who participated in the massacre on October 7th.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that what is called peace activists and workers of international human rights organizations of the UN, the Red Cross and WHO turned out to be terrorists and corrupt people of Hamas. Other turned out to be Hamas terrorists who participated in the massacre on October 7th.

🔴Suddenly we discovered that each of the leaders of Hamas is a billionaire and richer than President Trump with a net worth of four to S5 billion each.

So after Hamas started the war on October 7th by infiltrating to Israel, the world has discovered a lot of what's going on in Gaza, especially from the Arab world.

Now the Arab world has unveiled the truth and discovered what's going on. And I think everyone in the world should understand what Hamas stands for.

Hamas doesn't really care for the people of Gaza. Hamas doesn't care for the Palestinians whatsoever. They just care about their own survival and they care about destruction of Israel.

And this is something that we cannot approve and this

is something that we will not stand for.

Memorandum from the three parties

*Memorandum from* *the three Parties of* *North Borneo, Brunei,* *and Sarawak Against the "Malaysia" to the United Nations* 

 （ September 9, 1962 ）

The three most representative parties in North Borneo, Brunei, and Sarawak, which are also actively leading the opposition to the Malaysia plan, submitted a memorandum to the Secretary-General of the United Nations on September 9, 1962, requesting the United Nations to intervene in the transfer of sovereignty of these regions from Britain to the Federation of Malaya, denying the rights of the local people and their independence.

 

In a letter accompanying this memorandum addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations, the chairmen of these three parties had requested the United Nations to promptly to provide them with an opportunity to testify orally before the Decolonization Committee or other appropriate bodies within the United Nations. The following is the full text of the memorandum:

 

This memorandum is jointly submitted by the following political organizations of British North Borneo, Brunei, and Sarawak:

 

(1) United National Organization of Barsomo Morgan in British North Borneo - a political party with thirty thousand members, the majority of whom are indigenous people of Borneo, residents, and hundreds of Chinese who were born in North Borneo or have chosen North Borneo as their home and allegiance.

 

(2) Brunei People's Party - a political party established in Brunei in 1956, with twenty-six thousand members, including all ethnic groups in Brunei, and enjoys overwhelming support from the people of Brunei.

 

(3) Sarawak United People's Party - the earliest and largest political party established in Sarawak, with forty-seven thousand members, including various ethnic groups such as the Dayak and Malay living in Sarawak, making it the most represented political party.

 

These three parties represented the nationalist movements in their respective regions. They are independently organized and are striving for self-government and independence in accordance with the natural desires of the people of British North Borneo.

 

Sarawak and British North Borneo (also known as Sabah) are referred to as British colonies with no representative government. The British government has repeatedly stated that it had allowed the people of these regions to establish autonomous governments and independence.

 

The Sultanate of Brunei was once ruled most of the territories of Sabah and Sarawak until the mid-nineteenth century. Brunei is currently a protected state of the British Commonwealth, and the political affairs of this country are greatly influenced by the British through its High Commissioner, but it does not have a representative government itself.

 

On May 27, 1961, Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman of the Federation of Malaya had made a statement on the concept of Malaysia, and it was immediately responded by the Malayan and Singapore governments. In response, the representatives from North Borneo and Sarawak had attended a regional conference of the Commonwealth Parliamentary Association. The conference had recommended the establishment of the Malaysia Solidarity Consultative Committee, the route and steps of which were decided or influenced by the representatives of the governments of Singapore and Malaya.

 

On November 23, 1961, the British and Malayan governments had issued a joint statement, considering the establishment of the "Malaysia Federation" and was a desirable goal, and hence they have decided to set up an investigation team to determine the opinions of the people of North Borneo and Sarawak and make recommendations.

 

The composition of the investigation team consisted of Sir Lord Cobbold (Chairman), Sir Anthony Abell (former Governor of Sarawak), Sir David Waterson, Datuk Wong Pow Nee, and Encik Mohamed Ghazali bin Shafie The chairman was jointly selected by the British and Malayan governments, and the other four members were appointed by the British and another two appointed by the Malayan governments respectively.

 

In light of the decision of the British government, the colonial governments of Sabah and Sarawak had supported the establishment of Malaysia and attempted to use all the propaganda tools at their disposal to secure favorably position to this proposal. Consequently, anyone opposing Malaysia in Sarawak and elsewhere was indiscriminately labeled as communist, tantamount to being described as "bandits" or "foreign agents."

 

The investigation team held meetings in twenty locations in Sarawak and fifteen locations in Sabah, meeting with a total of 4,000 people from 690 groups in Sarawak and Sabah without holding a nationwide referendum.

 

The Brunei government had established its own committee to determine the opinions of its people and submitted the results of its investigation to His Majesty the Sultan of Brunei.

 

During the investigation held in Sarawak, no public demonstrations were allowed while the investigation team was presented, hence a nationwide signature campaign was launched, with approximately 112,000 adult signatures opposing the Malaysia plan were collected and submitted to the investigation team. These signatures were collected in a very short time and in the face of government propaganda against opposition. Given that fifty-five percent of the total population of 750,000, which were non-adults, the actual number of people who had opposed the Malaysia plan should be even higher.

 

The estimation of the investigation team was that, one-third of the population unconditionally supports the realization of Malaysia, one-third conditionally supports it with guarantees, and the rest opposed it. This estimation was completely erroneous and was not supported by data and facts, and obviously, the independent impartial observers did not accept such an estimates.

In August 1962, the British and Malayan governments declared in a joint communique that they had proposed Malaysia Federation should be established on August 31, 1963, and a formal agreement should be reached within six months of signing the communique for the transfer of sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak.

 

This decision had violated the Charter of the United Nations and its spirit, especially United Nations Resolution 1514 of December 14, 1960, and also had contradicted the fundamental principles of governance formulated by the White Rajah that had constituted the current constitution of Sarawak, which will be appended to this memorandum.

 

The findings of the committee appointed by His Majesty the Sultan of Brunei had shown that the vast majority of the people of Brunei had opposed to the Malaysia Federation.

 

Following a subsequent election, all 55 elected candidates of the only Brunei People’s Party had opposed to the formation of the Malaysia Federation. The Brunei People's Party used their opposition to the Malaysia Federation as their campaign platform.

 

The signatories of this memorandum appealed to and advocated the following to the United Nations: (1) The United Nations, in accordance with their declarations and resolutions, should intervene in the transfer of sovereignty of Sabah and Sarawak, as this transfer had denied the right of self-determination and full independence to the people of these regions; (2) An alternative solution was to hold a referendum organized and conducted by the United Nations before this transfer of sovereignty; (3) In accordance with the desires of free expression of the people, a federation comprising of Sabah, Sarawak, and Brunei should be established, with His Majesty the Sultan of Brunei as the constitutional head of this federation.

 

United National Organization Barsomo Morgan (signed by Chairman Song Dan)

Brunei People's Party (signed by Chairman Azhahari)

Sarawak United People’s Party (signed by Chairman Ong Kee Hui)

September 9, 1962

The 9 cardinal Principles from Rajah

解读Rajah 的9项治理原则

1. 砂拉越是砂拉越人的。

2. 透过教育和经济发展改善砂民的生活水平。

3. 砂民人人平等，绝不允许特权剥削砂人或受保护的人。

4. 保障正义和有规范合理的自由。

5. 文笔言论表达和宗教自由。

6. 完全依赖人民善意合作的公务员就是公仆。

7. 公共服务是以公务员的品德绩效做考核。

8. 自治是砂民的终极目标；透过教育让砂民实践政治管理的义务，责任和特权。

9. 以往和现在的统治者都期待砂各种族和谐幸福生活在一起。未来继承者以及所有公仆都必须遵守这9项治国原则。

It is, no doubt, ridiculous of Uggah, the GPS YB to say that giving material aid to school, they need approval from the Ministry of Education/MoE.

As far as I know, each GPS YB is given RM3 million for Rural Transformation Projects and RM5 million for Rural Minor Projects.  

If they are not able to give material aid at will to help schools, then what for to be given so much.

What purpose does this MoE serve if it fails to facilitate schools in good deeds.

Do Sarawakians think that it is time to flush out the political thugs who fail to deliver?

Giving material aids to school requires the green light from federal government

It is, no doubt, ridiculous of Uggah, the GPS YB to say that giving material aid to school, they need approval from the Ministry of Education/MoE.

As far as I know, each GPS YB is given RM3 million for Rural Transformation Projects and RM5 million for Rural Minor Projects.  

If they are not able to give material aid at will to help schools, then what for to be given so much.

What purpose does this MoE serve if it fails to facilitate schools in good deeds.

Do Sarawakians think that it is time to flush out the political thugs who fail to deliver?

砂重启沿海政策理智吗？

为了航运业发展

砂重启沿海贸易政策。

不让外国货船到砂直接靠岸御货，砂重启沿海贸易政策，到底是符合那一门的逻辑？

咱们砂人所用的货物大都是来自中国。中国货船自接来砂靠岸下货进自家港口货仓库，既省钱又方便。

为了满足航运业主的需求，牺牲了无数人民的福祉合情合理吗， 砂交通部长李？

船运费从巴生港口由砂货船转运来砂：从外国货船到巴生港口下货，进货库；到又上货到砂货船这些费用，到底是航运业者或砂百姓承担呢？我希望砂交通部长李给砂民一个符合逻辑的讲解。

砂土地掠夺者

你想知道砂拉越泰布占了多少土地吗？

泰布·马赫穆布（Taib Mahmub）拥有的财产清单。

1. 750公顷...在Sungai Lubai Tengah，Limbang Srwk Plantations该商业实体未私有化，由olh Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）和Hasmi b Hasnan拥有60%的股权。

2. 4,400公顷...在Sungai Medalam，Lawas Celerity Design Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib（Taib Mahmud的儿子）。

3. 9.000公顷...在Batang，Limbang Future Atmosphere Sdn Bhd Abu Bekir Taib。

4. 11,000 公顷位于 Limbang 的 Ulu Medamit – Dataran Aras Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

5. 3,000公顷...在美里廷贾尔 – Amazing Green Sdn Bhd – Teresa Toyad（与前国务秘书结婚的 Taib 家族）和 SCORE Wilson Baya Dandot 的首席执行官。

6. 750公顷...在街上，美里。

7. 2,000公顷...在trbang油田的重要位置，美里 – Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd & Must Bersatu Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Raziah Mahmud。

8. 500公顷...在美里的Sungai Sibuti – Premium Haven Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

9. 5,000公顷...在Sungai Teru & Batang Baram – Essential Straits Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

10. 1,100 公顷位于 Sungai Karap Umpama Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

11. 10,000 公顷，位于 1208 号地块 Sungai Karap – Abu Bekir Taib。

12. 50公顷...位于 Jalan Tusan， Sibuti – Ukiran Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

13. 4,000 公顷位于 Tinjar 的 Sungai Bok – Log Oak Promotion Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

14. 4,500 公顷的 Sungai Tutoh Syarikat Radiant Lagoon – Abu Bekir Taib。

15. 5,000公顷的土地，位于Sungai Karap & Sungai Kulak – Amgreen Gain Sdn Bhd – Ibrahim Mahmud（Taib的兄弟/姐妹）。

16. 50公顷...在Sungai Karabungan，Niah – Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）和Hasmi b Hasnan。

17. 31,000公顷...NCR在Long Lamai – Merawa Sdn Bhd（Samling Global的子公司）的土地。

18. Jalan Setium – Mega Bumimas Sdn Bhd（Ta An – Hamed Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）的子公司）占地2,600公顷。

19. Similajau – Sahua Enterprise Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani（砂拉越国阵秘书）的 10,000 公顷土地。

20. 4,500公顷...在Similajau – Derawan Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani（砂拉越国阵秘书）。

21. 15,000公顷...位于 Ba Jawi Samling Plywood （Miri） Sdn Bhd 的 Penans 的 NCR 土地。

22. 1,600公顷...在 Setuan – Hasmi Hasan（Taib 代理）。

23. 10,000 公顷位于 Sungai Takan 和 Ulu Sungai Nyatak， Tatau – Ikrar Bumi Sdn Bhd Elia Geneid（Taib 的侄女）。

24. 8,000公顷...在Balingian（该地区大部分地区最初是hutam Simpan Setuan Besar） – Saradu Plantations Sdn Bhd，Organic Treasure Sdn Bhd和Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd – Raziah Mahmud（adik Taib）和Robert Geneid（Taib的姐夫）。

25. 10,000公顷...在乌鲁穆卡 – 砂拉越种植园 该商业实体已被私有化，60% 的股权由 olh Hamid Sepawi（Taib 的堂兄）和 Hasmi b Hasnan 拥有。

26. 5,000公顷...在Mukah – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd（Taib Mahmud）和LCD（主席是Taib Mahmud）。

27. Sungai Bawan 的 5,000 公顷土地 – Palmlyn Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud 和 Arip Mahmud。

28. 13,000公顷的土地，位于Sungai Bawan Golden Star Ace Sdn Bhd – Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud。

29. 4,000 公顷位于 Sungai Sikat， Mukah – Bella Magic Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib。

30. 肯尼亚 Rajah Mutiara Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud 和 Arip Mahmud 的 5,000 公顷土地。

31. Loba Kabang 的 2,000 公顷土地 – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud（Taib 的兄弟/姐妹）。

32. Penasu Igan – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud（Taib 的兄弟/姐妹）的 2,050 公顷土地。

33. 5,000公顷的土地，位于Batang，Oya和Batang Mukah – Kub Sepadu Sdn Bhd – Hamid Sepawi（Taib表亲）之间。

34. Sungai Retus – Hariyama Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud 的 10,500 公顷土地。

35. 768公顷...在Pasai Siong，Sungai Retus – Masretus Oil Palm Plantation Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud（Taib的兄弟），Yahya bin Ibrahim（Taib的侄女）和Mahmud bin Ibrahim（Taib的侄女）。

36. 400公顷...在Tulai Meradong – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd（Taib Mahmud）和LCD（主席是Taib Mahmud）。

37. 2,000公顷...在诗巫的巴塘黎巴嫩 – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd （Taib Mahmud） & LCDA（主席是 Taib Mahmud）。

38. 100公顷...在诗巫的Sungai Lengan – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd（Taib Mahmud）和LCDA（主席是Taib Mahmud）。

39. 600公顷...在双溪马来，美拉东 – 砂拉越种植园 – 该商业实体已私有化，60% 的股权由 olh Hamid Sepawi （Taib 的堂兄） 和 Hasmi b Hasnan 拥有。

40. Batang Lassa 的 1,113 公顷土地 – Europalm Sdn Bhd（Ta Ann Holdings 的子公司）– Hamid Sepawi（Taib 的堂兄）。

41. 1,500公顷...在达罗的Jin Matu – Europalm Sdn Bhd（Ta Ann Holdings的子公司）Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）。

42. 90公顷...在Kampung Tebang，Batang Lassa，Daro – Multi Maximum Sdn Bhd（Ta Ann Holdings的子公司）Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）。

43. 布鲁伊特岛的15,000公顷土地 – Eastern Eden Sdn Bhd & Poh Zhen Sdn Bhd – Arip Mahmud （兄弟/姐妹 Taib）、Ali Mahmud （Taib 的兄弟/姐妹） 和 Azerina Mohd Arip （Taib 的姐夫）。

44. Paloh Delta Padi Sdn Bhd （Taib Mahmud） & LCDA（主席是 Taib Mahmud）的 7,700 公顷土地。

45. 9,000 公顷土地位于 Sungai Machan Tengah – Polar Tower Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib（Taib 的儿子）。

46. 5,000公顷...在Sungai Selepong & Sungai Kawasan – Ample Agro Sdn Bhd – Fatimah Abdul Rahman（YB Norah binti Abdul Rahman的妹妹/妹妹，也是Taib的堂兄）。

47. Sri Aman Bijat Land District 的 70,000 公顷土地 – 几家公司管理着 olh Titanium Management Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib（Taib Mahmud 的儿子）。

48. Sungai Klauh & Sungai Dor – Tabaruk Abadi Sdn Bhd Ali Mahmud（Taib Mahmud的兄弟/姐妹）的2,300公顷土地。

49. 700公顷...在Sungai Batang Klauh – Sarawak Plantations该商业实体已私有化，60%的股权由olh Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）和Hasmi b Hasnan拥有。

50. 900公顷...在Melugu，Sri Aman - 砂拉越油棕 - 该商业实体也已私有化，60%的股权由olh Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）和Hasmi b Hasnan拥有。

51. 7,000公顷的Simunjan Gedong Plantation Sdn Bhd –Naroden Majais（国阵政治家）。

52. 5,000公顷土地在Batang Sadong – Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais（国阵政治家）。

53. 5,600公顷...在Batang Sadong – Hydroflow Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais（国阵政治家）。

54. 700公顷...在Sungai Igom – Poliga Sdn Bhd – Ahmad bin Su'ut （bomoh Taib Mahmud）之间。

55. 1,000公顷...砂拉越种植园 – 该商业实体已私有化，60% 的股权由 olh Hamid Sepawi （Taib 的堂兄） d Hasmi b Hasnan 拥有。

56. 500公顷...在 Munggu Kupi，Serian – Ahmad bin Su'ut（萨满 Taib Mahmud）。

57. 354公顷...位于Serian的Batang Sadong和Ensengai路之间的Kampung Segenam的NCR土地居民 - 给予Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd - Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd的股东是Asset Teamwork Sdn Bhd（125,000个单位），Ting Kang Hwa（187,500个单位），Betty Yii Pick Koung（7,500个单位），Wong Kuok Kai（325,000个单位），Lau Hie Ping（75,000个单位），Wong Kuo Hea（375,000个单位）， Knightswealth Sdn Bhd（50,000 个单位）、Chai Min Kian（125,000 个单位）、Lim Choo Tad（25,000 个单位）、Siew Meng Kun（55,000 个单位）、Century Merit Sdn Bhd（125,000 个单位）、Transwill Sdn Bhd（125,000 个单位）和 Butrasemari Sdn Bhd（900,000 个单位）——注：来自 Ta Ann Holdings 的 Lau Hie Ping、Wong Kuo Hea、Lim Choo Tad、Siew Meng Kun Kun 是砂拉越国阵成员党 SUPP 的政治家。 Butrasemari Sdn Bhd 与 Abdul Hamid Sepawi（Taib Mahmud 的代理人）的关系他是Ta Ann Holdings的执行主席。

58. 3,305公顷...在Sebangan – Quality Concrete Holdings Berhad Raziah Mahmud（Taib的妹妹/妹妹）。

59. Sungai Bakong & Sungai Karap – Polar Red Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib（Taib Mahmud 的儿子）的 10,000 公顷土地。

60. 700英亩（283公顷）...在古晋的Batu 13 – 必须是Bersatu Sdn Bhd，LCDA（主席是Taib Mahmud）和Lanco Plantations（Arip Mahmud家族 - Taib的兄弟/姐妹）。

61. 1,300公顷...在Kemajuan，Lembaga Sarawak Plantations – 该商业实体已被私有化，由olh Hamid Sepawi（Taib的堂兄）和Hasmi b Hasnan Taib拥有60%的股权 Taib的个人财富为150亿美元（460亿令吉） 家庭财产 210亿美元（640亿令吉）   

亲爱的大家，请记住，所有 RAKYAT 钱都不是 GPS 钱！

请尽可能广泛地向每一位马来西亚选民传阅！谢谢。

Land in Taib Mahmud's possession

You want to know how much land in Sarawak Taib has taken?

SENARAI HARTA YG DI MILIKI OLEH Taib Mahmub. 

1. 750 hektar … di Sungai Lubai Tengah, Limbang Srwk Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini tlh diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

2. 4,400 hektar … di Sungai Medalam, Lawas Celerity Design Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

3. 9.000 hektar … di Batang, Limbang Future Atmosphere Sdn Bhd Abu Bekir Taib.

4. 11,000 hektar di Ulu Medamit, Limbang – Dataran Aras Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

5. 3,000 hektar … di Tinjar,Miri – Amazing Green Sdn Bhd – Teresa Toyad (keluarga Taib yg berkahwin dgn bekas Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri) & CEO kpd SCORE Wilson Baya Dandot.

6. 750 hektar … di Jalan, Miri.

7. 2,000 hektar … di lokasi penting lapangan trbang, Miri – Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd & Mesti Bersatu Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Raziah Mahmud.

8. 500 hektar … di Sungai Sibuti, Miri – Premium Haven Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

9. 5,000 hektar … di Sungai Teru & Batang Baram – Essential Straits Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

10. 1,100 hektar di Sungai Karap Umpama Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

11. 10,000 hektar di Lot 1208 Sungai Karap – Abu Bekir Taib.

12. 50 hektar … di Jalan Tusan, Sibuti – Ukiran Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

13. 4,000 hektar di Sungai Bok, Tinjar – Log Oak Promotion Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

14. 4,500 hektar di Sungai Tutoh Syarikat Radiant Lagoon – Abu Bekir Taib.

15. 5,000 hektar di Sungai Karap & Sungai Kulak – Amgreen Gain Sdn Bhd – Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

16. 50 hektar … di Sungai Karabungan, Niah – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

17. 31,000 hektar … tanah NCR di Long Lamai – Merawa Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Samling Global).

18. 2,600 hektar di Jalan Setium – Mega Bumimas Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta An – Hamed Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

19. 10,000 hektar di Similajau – Sahua Enterprise Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani (Setiausaha BN Sarawak).

20. 4,500 hektar … di Similajau – Derawan Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani (Setiausaha BN Sarawak).

21. 15,000 hektar … tanah NCR kaum Penan di Ba Jawi Samling Plywood (Miri) Sdn Bhd.

22. 1,600 hektar … di Setuan – Hasmi Hasan (proksi Taib).

23. 10,000 hektar di Sungai Takan & Ulu Sungai Nyatak, Tatau – Ikrar Bumi Sdn Bhd Elia Geneid (anak saudara Taib).

24. 8,000 hektar … di Balingian (sebahagian besar kawasan ini asalnya adalah hutam simpan Setuan Besar) – Saradu Plantations Sdn Bhd, Organic Treasure Sdn Bhd & Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd – Raziah Mahmud (adik Taib) & Robert Geneid (ipar Taib).

25. 10,000 hektar … di Ulu Mukah – Sarawak Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

26. 5,000 hektar … di Mukah – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCD (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

27. 5,000 hektar di Sungai Bawan – Palmlyn Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

28. 13,000 hektar di Sungai Bawan Golden Star Ace Sdn Bhd – Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

29. 4,000 hektar di Sungai Sikat, Mukah – Bella Magic Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

30. 5,000 hektar di Kenyana Rajah Mutiara Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

31. 2,000 hektar di Loba Kabang – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

32. 2,050 hektar di Penasu Igan – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

33. 5,000 hektar di Antara Batang, Oya & Batang Mukah – Kub Sepadu Sdn Bhd – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

34. 10,500 hektar di Sungai Retus – Hariyama Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

35. 768 hektar … di Pasai Siong, Sungai Retus – Masretus Oil Palm Plantation Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud(abang/ adik Taib), Yahya bin Ibrahim (anak saudara Taib) & Mahmud bin Ibrahim (anak saudara Taib).

36. 400 hektar … di Tulai Meradong – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCD(pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

37. 2,000 hektar … di Batang Lebaan, Sibu – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

38. 100 hektar … di Sungai Lengan, Sibu – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

39. 600 hektar … di Sungai Melayu, Meradong – Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

40. 1,113 hektar di Batang Lassa – Europalm Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

41. 1,500 hektar … di Jin Matu, Daro – Europalm Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

42. 90 hektar … di Kampung Tebang, Batang Lassa,Daro – Multi Maximum Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

43. 15,000 hektar di Pulau Bruit – Eastern Eden Sdn Bhd & Poh Zhen Sdn Bhd – Arip Mahmud (abang/adik Taib), Ali Mahmud (abang/adik Taib) & Azerina Mohd Arip (ipar Taib).

44. 7,700 hektar di Paloh Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

45. 9,000 hektar di Sungai Machan Tengah – Polar Tower Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib).

46. 5,000 hektar … di Sungai Selepong & Sungai Kawasan – Ample Agro Sdn Bhd – Fatimah Abdul Rahman (kakak/adik kpd YB Norah binti Abdul Rahman yg juga sepupu Taib).

47. 70,000 hektar di Bijat Land District, Sri Aman –beberapa buah syarikat yg diuruskan olh Titanium Management Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

48. 2,300 hektar di Sungai Klauh & Sungai Dor – Tabaruk Abadi Sdn Bhd Ali Mahmud (abang/adik Taib Mahmud).

49. 700 hektar … di Sungai Batang Klauh – Sarawak Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

50. 900 hektar … di Melugu,Sri Aman – Sarawak Oil Palm – Entiti perniagaan ini juga telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

51. 7,000 hektar di Simunjan Gedong Plantation Sdn Bhd –Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

52. 5,000 hektar di Batang Sadong – Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

53. 5,600 hektar … di Batang Sadong – Hydroflow Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

54. 700 hektar … di Antara Sungai Igom – Poliga Sdn Bhd – Ahmad bin Su’ut (bomoh Taib Mahmud).

55. 1,000 hektar … Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) d Hasmi b Hasnan.

56. 500 hektar … di Munggu Kupi, Serian – Ahmad bin Su’ut (bomoh Taib Mahmud).

57. 354 hektar … tanah NCR penduduk Kampung Segenam, di antara Batang Sadong & Ensengai Road, Serian –diberikan kpd Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd –pemegang saham Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd ialah Asset Teamwork Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit saham), Ting Kang Hwa (187,500 unit), Betty Yii Pick Koung (7,500 unit), Wong Kuok Kai (325,000 unit), Lau Hie Ping (75,000 unit), Wong Kuo Hea (375,000 unit), Knightswealth Sdn Bhd (50,000 unit), Chai Min Kian (125,000 unit), Lim Choo Tad (25,000 unit), Siew Meng Kun (55,000 unit), Century Merit Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit), Transwill Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit) & Butrasemari Sdn Bhd (900,000 unit) – Nota : Lau Hie Ping, Wong Kuo Hea, Lim Choo Tad, Siew Meng Kun drpd Ta Ann Holdings & Chai Min Kian adalah politikus parti komponen BN Sarawak iaitu SUPP. Butrasemari Sdn Bhd berkait dgn Abdul Hamid Sepawi (proksi Taib Mahmud) yg merupakan Pengerusi Eksekutif Ta Ann Holdings.

58. 3,305 hektar … di Sebangan – Quality Concrete Holdings Berhad Raziah Mahmud (kakak/adik Taib).

59. 10,000 hektar di Sungai Bakong & Sungai Karap – Polar Red Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

60. 700 ekar (283 hektar)… di Batu 13, Kuching – Mesti Bersatu Sdn Bhd, LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud) & Lanco Plantations (keluarga Arip Mahmud – abang/adik Taib).

61. 1,300 hektar … di Kemajuan, Lembaga Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan Kekayaan perbadi Taib ialah AS$ 15 Billion (RM 46 Billion) Harta keluarga AS$21 bilion (RM64 bilion)    

Dear all please remember this all RAKYAT money not BN money !!!

 KINDLY CIRCULATE TO EVERY MALAYSIAN VOTER, AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE! THANKS.

Special rights-- article 153

*Special rights - Getting to the bottom of Article 153*

Kim Quek

Published: Dec 7, 2004 2:57 PM

⋅

Updated: Jan 29, 2008 6:21 PM

The recurring issue of Malay 'special rights' was again brought into focus when Parliamentary Opposition Leader Lim Kit Siang moved to reprimand Higher Education Minister Shaffie Salleh in Parliament for the latter's recent racial utterances.

Forty-seven years after Independence, racial issues continue to monopolise national politics, and championing Malay rights remains the single dominant ideology of the only ruling power that this independent nation has known, Umno.

Speeches have been made championing this Malay cause, using various terminologies such as Malay 'special rights', Malay 'special privileges' or simply Malay 'rights', often invoking the nation's Constitution as the legal back-up.

But, of the many politicians who have used these terminologies, how many have read through the Constitution to find out what these 'rights' really are?

If you have read through the Constitution to look for an answer to these Malay 'rights', perhaps the first thing that has struck you is that familiar terminologies such as Malay 'special rights', Malay 'special privileges' or Malay 'rights' are no where to be found.

Instead, we only find the term 'the special position of the Malays', which appears twice, in Clause (1) and Clause (2) of Article 153, which is titled 'Reservation of quotas in respect of services, permits, etc, for Malays and natives of any of the States of Sabah and Sarawak'.

(The natives of Sabah and Sarawak were only incorporated into the Constitution upon the formation of Malaysia in 1963, during which Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore were merged with Malaya to form Malaysia. In this letter, the words 'the natives of Sabah and Sarawak' will not be repeated after the word 'Malay' when I quote from the Constitution, for abbreviation purposes).

Anyone who has read through Article 153 might be surprised to discover that the provisions favouring Malays are in fact quite moderate, and certainly no way as stretched out in intensity and scope as our politicians would want us to believe.

Similarly, those provisions protecting the non-Malays as a counter-balance to the special position of the Malays under this Article are also surprisingly quite well-conceived and fair. In fact, when read in conjunction with Article 8 (Equality) and Article 136 (Impartial treatment of Federal employees), Article 153 cannot be construed as having significantly violated the egalitarian principles of our Constitution, contrary to common perception.

Since the egalitarian nature of our Constitution is largely intact, in spite of the presence of Article 153, then why should it have acquired such an adverse reputation as the legal root of all kinds of racial inequalities in this country?

Answer: The fault lies not with our Constitution but with our politicians twisting, misinterpreting and abusing it.

It is perhaps high time we get to the bottom of Article 153.

Clause (1) of Article 153 states: 'It shall be the responsibility of the Yang di Pertuan Agong to safeguard the special position of the Malays and the legitimate interests of other communities in accordance with the provisions of this Article'.

So, the first understanding that we must have on Article 153 is that it is meant to protect the interests of not only the Malays, but also those of the non-Malays.

Next, note the deliberate use of the words 'safeguard' and 'special position' (instead of 'special rights' or 'special privileges'). The choice of these words must be understood in the historical context of the drafting of this Constitution half a century ago when Malays were economically and educationally backward in relation to other races.

It was thought fit and proper then that there must be 'safeguards' to protect the Malays from being swarmed over by other races. Hence, the creation of the 'special position' of the Malays, which was obviously intended for defensive purposes: to protect and for survival.

The impeccable avoidance of using words like 'rights' and 'privileges', and the choice of the word 'safeguard' were clearly calculated to reflect its defensive nature. Under that historical context, the provision of the special position of the Malays in the Constitution certainly could not be interpreted to mean the endowment of racial privileges to create a privileged class of citizenship.

Clause (2) says that the Yang di Pertuan Agong shall safeguard the special position of the Malays by reserving positions 'of such proportion as he may deem reasonable' in a) the public service b) educational facilities and c) business licences.

Clauses (3) and (6) say that the Yang di Pertuan Agong may, for purpose of fulfilling Clause (2), give general directions to the relevant authorities, which shall then duly comply.

There is a separate clause covering the allocation of seats in tertiary education Clause (8A). It says that where there are insufficient places for any particular course of study, the Yang di Pertuan Agong may give directions for the '... reservation of such proportion of such places for Malays as the Yang di Pertuan Agong may deem reasonable; 

and the authority shall duly comply with the directions'.

As for the protection of non-Malays against possible encroachment of their existing interests, there are several provisions under different clauses in this Article, prohibiting the deprivation of the existing facilities enjoyed by them, whether in public service, education or trading licences.

Of these protective clauses, Clauses (5) and (9) are particularly significant.

Clause (5) consists of one sentence, which reads: 'This Article does not derogate from the provisions of Article 136'.

Article 136 also consists of one sentence, which reads: 'All persons of whatever race in the same grade in the service of the Federation shall, subject to the terms and conditions of their employment, be treated impartially.'

Clause (9) consists of one sentence, which reads: 'Nothing in this Article shall empower Parliament to restrict business or trade solely for the purpose of reservations for Malays.'

Reading Article 153 will not be complete without reading Article 89 (Equality). I will quote the more significant Clauses (1) and (2) of this Article in full, as follows:

*Clause (1) states: 'All persons are equal before the law and entitled to the equal protection of the law.*'

Clause (2) states: 'Except as expressly authorised by this Constitution, there shall be no discrimination against citizens on the ground only of religion, race, descent or place of birth in any law or in the appointment to any office or employment under a public authority or in the administration of any law relating to the acquisition, holding or disposition of property or the establishing or carrying on of any trade, business, profession, vocation or employment.'

Reading through these Articles of the Constitution, we are able to draw the following conclusions:

That the *clamour for Malay 'special rights' as sacrosanct racial privileges of a privileged race, especially under the ideological ambit of 'Ketuanan Melayu', is in conflict with the letter and spirit of the Constitution*.

That the *special position of the Malays as prescribed under Article 153 of the Constitution is limited in scope to only the reservation of reasonable quotas in these three sectors - public services, educational places and business licences*.

Hence, the *present rampant racial discriminations practiced in almost every facet of our national life are mostly violations of the Constitution*. Examples of these violations are:

*a) Racial discrimination in the appointment and promotion of employees in publicly-funded bodies, resulting in the latter becoming almost mono-raced bodies* (particular so in their top strata). These bodies include the civil service, the police, the army and various semi- and quasi-government agencies.

*b) Barring of non-Malays from tenders and contracts controlled directly or indirectly by the government*.

*c) Imposition of compulsory price discounts and quotas in favour of Malays in housing projects.*

*d) Imposition of compulsory share quotas for Malays in non-Malay companies.*

*e) Blanket barring of non-Malays to publicly-funded academic institutions.*

*f) A completely lopsided allocation of scholarships and seats of learning in clearly unreasonable proportions that reflect racial discriminations*.

*_Our Constitution provides for only one class of citizenship and all citizens are equal before the law_. The presence of Article 153 does not alter this fact, as it is meant only to protect the Malays from being 'squeezed' by other races by allowing the reservation of reasonable quotas on certain sectors of national life*.

However, this *Constitution has now been hijacked through decades of hegemony by the ruling party to result in the virtual monopoly of the public sector by a single race. The ensuing racism, corruption and corrosion of integrity in our democratic institutions have brought about serious retrogression to our nation-building process in terms of national unity, discipline, morality and competitiveness of our people*.

At this critical juncture, when nations in this region and around the world are urgently restructuring and shaping up to cope with globalisation, *our nation stagnates in a cesspool that has been created through decades of misrule*.

Unless urgent reforms are carried out, beginning with the dismantling of the anachronistic racial superstructure, we are in for serious trouble in the days ahead.

促政府立即冻结泰益资产

促政府立即冻结泰益资产 瑞士NGO：重启贪腐调查

======================

【 KiniTV 中文频道 影片】砂拉越前州元首泰益玛目昨天去世，瑞士维权组织“布鲁诺曼瑟基金”敦促大马政府，立即冻结泰益的资产，并重新调查泰益和家族成员的贪腐问题。

布鲁诺曼瑟基金（Bruno Manser Fund）执行董事司陶曼（Lukas Straumann）今早发文告指出，之前的调查在2016年基于政治原因而结束，反贪会如今应该重新立案。

此外，司陶曼促请当局立即冻结泰益的所有个人银行账户和其他资产，以避免这些非法取得的财富被其家庭成员挪用。

他指控，虽然法律禁止砂州首长或元首涉及商务，但是泰益却在出任公职的六十年期间聚敛庞大的财富，包括允许砂拉越最大的官企，也就是砂州日光有限公司（CMS）的私营化，而这家企业在1990年代初落入泰益亲人的手上。

司陶曼接着指控，泰益执政期间，大肆允许伐木和种植园开发，导致砂拉越原始森林蒙受巨大伤害。

布鲁诺曼瑟基金过去就不断紧咬泰益和他的家族，批评他们通过贪污敛财。根据基金会2012年的报告，估计泰益家族坐拥高达210亿美元，如今折算为马币超过1000亿令吉的资产，而泰益一人就拥有150亿美元的财富，足以超越“糖王”郭鹤年成为大马首富。

不过，泰益和他的家族驳斥布鲁诺曼瑟基金的指控，甚至发动诉讼反击，包括起诉对方诽谤。

#泰益玛目 #财富 #贪污 #敛财 #砂拉越 #伐木 #布鲁诺曼瑟基金 #反贪会 #Kinitv中文频道

Land Taib Mahmud has taken

You want to know how much land in Sarawak Taib has taken?

SENARAI HARTA YG DI MILIKI OLEH Taib Mahmub. 

1. 750 hektar … di Sungai Lubai Tengah, Limbang Srwk Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini tlh diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

2. 4,400 hektar … di Sungai Medalam, Lawas Celerity Design Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

3. 9.000 hektar … di Batang, Limbang Future Atmosphere Sdn Bhd Abu Bekir Taib.

4. 11,000 hektar di Ulu Medamit, Limbang – Dataran Aras Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

5. 3,000 hektar … di Tinjar,Miri – Amazing Green Sdn Bhd – Teresa Toyad (keluarga Taib yg berkahwin dgn bekas Setiausaha Kerajaan Negeri) & CEO kpd SCORE Wilson Baya Dandot.

6. 750 hektar … di Jalan, Miri.

7. 2,000 hektar … di lokasi penting lapangan trbang, Miri – Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd & Mesti Bersatu Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Raziah Mahmud.

8. 500 hektar … di Sungai Sibuti, Miri – Premium Haven Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

9. 5,000 hektar … di Sungai Teru & Batang Baram – Essential Straits Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

10. 1,100 hektar di Sungai Karap Umpama Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

11. 10,000 hektar di Lot 1208 Sungai Karap – Abu Bekir Taib.

12. 50 hektar … di Jalan Tusan, Sibuti – Ukiran Mantap Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

13. 4,000 hektar di Sungai Bok, Tinjar – Log Oak Promotion Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

14. 4,500 hektar di Sungai Tutoh Syarikat Radiant Lagoon – Abu Bekir Taib.

15. 5,000 hektar di Sungai Karap & Sungai Kulak – Amgreen Gain Sdn Bhd – Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

16. 50 hektar … di Sungai Karabungan, Niah – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

17. 31,000 hektar … tanah NCR di Long Lamai – Merawa Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Samling Global).

18. 2,600 hektar di Jalan Setium – Mega Bumimas Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta An – Hamed Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

19. 10,000 hektar di Similajau – Sahua Enterprise Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani (Setiausaha BN Sarawak).

20. 4,500 hektar … di Similajau – Derawan Sdn Bhd – Mohamid Morshidi bin Abdul Ghani (Setiausaha BN Sarawak).

21. 15,000 hektar … tanah NCR kaum Penan di Ba Jawi Samling Plywood (Miri) Sdn Bhd.

22. 1,600 hektar … di Setuan – Hasmi Hasan (proksi Taib).

23. 10,000 hektar di Sungai Takan & Ulu Sungai Nyatak, Tatau – Ikrar Bumi Sdn Bhd Elia Geneid (anak saudara Taib).

24. 8,000 hektar … di Balingian (sebahagian besar kawasan ini asalnya adalah hutam simpan Setuan Besar) – Saradu Plantations Sdn Bhd, Organic Treasure Sdn Bhd & Kumpulan Parabena Sdn Bhd – Raziah Mahmud (adik Taib) & Robert Geneid (ipar Taib).

25. 10,000 hektar … di Ulu Mukah – Sarawak Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

26. 5,000 hektar … di Mukah – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCD (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

27. 5,000 hektar di Sungai Bawan – Palmlyn Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

28. 13,000 hektar di Sungai Bawan Golden Star Ace Sdn Bhd – Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

29. 4,000 hektar di Sungai Sikat, Mukah – Bella Magic Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib.

30. 5,000 hektar di Kenyana Rajah Mutiara Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

31. 2,000 hektar di Loba Kabang – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

32. 2,050 hektar di Penasu Igan – Victoria Square Development Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud (abang/adik Taib).

33. 5,000 hektar di Antara Batang, Oya & Batang Mukah – Kub Sepadu Sdn Bhd – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

34. 10,500 hektar di Sungai Retus – Hariyama Sdn Bhd Taib Mahmud & Arip Mahmud.

35. 768 hektar … di Pasai Siong, Sungai Retus – Masretus Oil Palm Plantation Sdn Bhd Ibrahim Mahmud(abang/ adik Taib), Yahya bin Ibrahim (anak saudara Taib) & Mahmud bin Ibrahim (anak saudara Taib).

36. 400 hektar … di Tulai Meradong – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCD(pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

37. 2,000 hektar … di Batang Lebaan, Sibu – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

38. 100 hektar … di Sungai Lengan, Sibu – Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

39. 600 hektar … di Sungai Melayu, Meradong – Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

40. 1,113 hektar di Batang Lassa – Europalm Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) – Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

41. 1,500 hektar … di Jin Matu, Daro – Europalm Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

42. 90 hektar … di Kampung Tebang, Batang Lassa,Daro – Multi Maximum Sdn Bhd (anak syarikat Ta Ann Holdings) Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib).

43. 15,000 hektar di Pulau Bruit – Eastern Eden Sdn Bhd & Poh Zhen Sdn Bhd – Arip Mahmud (abang/adik Taib), Ali Mahmud (abang/adik Taib) & Azerina Mohd Arip (ipar Taib).

44. 7,700 hektar di Paloh Delta Padi Sdn Bhd (Taib Mahmud) & LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud).

45. 9,000 hektar di Sungai Machan Tengah – Polar Tower Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib).

46. 5,000 hektar … di Sungai Selepong & Sungai Kawasan – Ample Agro Sdn Bhd – Fatimah Abdul Rahman (kakak/adik kpd YB Norah binti Abdul Rahman yg juga sepupu Taib).

47. 70,000 hektar di Bijat Land District, Sri Aman –beberapa buah syarikat yg diuruskan olh Titanium Management Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

48. 2,300 hektar di Sungai Klauh & Sungai Dor – Tabaruk Abadi Sdn Bhd Ali Mahmud (abang/adik Taib Mahmud).

49. 700 hektar … di Sungai Batang Klauh – Sarawak Plantations Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

50. 900 hektar … di Melugu,Sri Aman – Sarawak Oil Palm – Entiti perniagaan ini juga telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan.

51. 7,000 hektar di Simunjan Gedong Plantation Sdn Bhd –Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

52. 5,000 hektar di Batang Sadong – Indranika Jaya Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

53. 5,600 hektar … di Batang Sadong – Hydroflow Sdn Bhd – Naroden Majais (ahli politik BN).

54. 700 hektar … di Antara Sungai Igom – Poliga Sdn Bhd – Ahmad bin Su’ut (bomoh Taib Mahmud).

55. 1,000 hektar … Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakan, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) d Hasmi b Hasnan.

56. 500 hektar … di Munggu Kupi, Serian – Ahmad bin Su’ut (bomoh Taib Mahmud).

57. 354 hektar … tanah NCR penduduk Kampung Segenam, di antara Batang Sadong & Ensengai Road, Serian –diberikan kpd Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd –pemegang saham Usaha Jasamaju Sdn Bhd ialah Asset Teamwork Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit saham), Ting Kang Hwa (187,500 unit), Betty Yii Pick Koung (7,500 unit), Wong Kuok Kai (325,000 unit), Lau Hie Ping (75,000 unit), Wong Kuo Hea (375,000 unit), Knightswealth Sdn Bhd (50,000 unit), Chai Min Kian (125,000 unit), Lim Choo Tad (25,000 unit), Siew Meng Kun (55,000 unit), Century Merit Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit), Transwill Sdn Bhd (125,000 unit) & Butrasemari Sdn Bhd (900,000 unit) – Nota : Lau Hie Ping, Wong Kuo Hea, Lim Choo Tad, Siew Meng Kun drpd Ta Ann Holdings & Chai Min Kian adalah politikus parti komponen BN Sarawak iaitu SUPP. Butrasemari Sdn Bhd berkait dgn Abdul Hamid Sepawi (proksi Taib Mahmud) yg merupakan Pengerusi Eksekutif Ta Ann Holdings.

58. 3,305 hektar … di Sebangan – Quality Concrete Holdings Berhad Raziah Mahmud (kakak/adik Taib).

59. 10,000 hektar di Sungai Bakong & Sungai Karap – Polar Red Sdn Bhd – Abu Bekir Taib (anak Taib Mahmud).

60. 700 ekar (283 hektar)… di Batu 13, Kuching – Mesti Bersatu Sdn Bhd, LCDA (pengerusinya ialah Taib Mahmud) & Lanco Plantations (keluarga Arip Mahmud – abang/adik Taib).

61. 1,300 hektar … di Kemajuan, Lembaga Sarawak Plantations – Entiti perniagaan ini telah diswastakn, 60% pegangan saham dimiliki olh Hamid Sepawi (sepupu Taib) & Hasmi b Hasnan Kekayaan perbadi Taib ialah AS$ 15 Billion (RM 46 Billion) Harta keluarga AS$21 bilion (RM64 bilion)    

Dear all please remember this all RAKYAT money not BN money !!!

 KINDLY CIRCULATE TO EVERY MALAYSIAN VOTER, AS WIDELY AS POSSIBLE! THANKS.