Pages

Powered By Blogger

Sunday 31 December 2023

有话直说 1/1/24

有话直说 1/1/24

目前联邦席位分配必须是A 65%:HK 35%。这是沙砂傀儡政府最低要求。

这就必须减A议席;加HK以保持65%:35%。

沙砂人民真正要的是各三分之一,否则脱马独立去,向新加坡看齐。绝对是正确的。

请参考Cobbold Commission Report: Paragraph 236(a)(i) 幅员和潜能也必须是考量席位分配。

给沙砂35%,让他们决定怎么分配。

说砂席位从31增加到43,会促成该政党做大,不知道这些博士专家们是用哪一门的逻辑思维模式。

A邦国专家们恐慌的是A国无法任性尽情掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫,霸凌和殖民沙砂吧!

一面唱KAH/AHK三国联邦平等伙伴关系;一面专干‘挂羊头卖狗肉’的丑恶行径了吧!

沙砂傀儡政府只要求35%联邦议席

沙砂傀儡政府只要求35%联邦议席却引发如此反弹。自1963年开始沙砂一直退让。因此早就今天马来亚联邦席位分配是75%而沙砂只有25%。

沙砂以国身份参组马联邦,所以是三国联邦平等伙伴关系。

可是,马霸权不遵守MA63, 在国阵巫统胡搞之下在1976年,违反国际法把沙砂贬成13州之一。

2021年复邦后,马霸权,还是我行我素殊不知,惹怒多少沙砂人民。

Malay(A); Saba(H)和Sarawa(K)各邦国身份代表。

议席分配和联邦拨款怎能是A+H+K总人口来计算?这岂不是致沙砂于死地或永远遭殃。

博士进发黄和Merdeka民调中心主任都同声同气认为应该是A+H+K的马联邦总人数来决定联邦席位。他们根本不尊重Cobbold Comission Report: Paragraph 236(a)(i)除了人口,还要考虑沙沙的幅员和潜能。

如果是以人口划分选区也必须是各邦国的人口。绝对不是A+H+K的总人口。

今天H K要求35%:A65%有什么过分或引起政治动荡?

其实,沙砂人民要各三分之一。

知识就是力量:Petroniaga 吸纳5000万

知识就是力量
Petroniaga 有限公司耗逾5000万吸纳

Petroniaga 有限公司进行投资5000多万加强供应商网络,提升存储能力,注入兑换煤气桶和强化物流管理。

Petroniaga 有布局65名经销商和280名次经销商供应网络。

对于MyGaz停止营业后其属下的经/次经销商或零售商几乎都过度进Petroniaga 而非砂火箭林财耀所言失业。

原本3个月才能达标的黄兑换红桶,就在短短3週就换了16.5万桶。其实,煤气桶兑换没有设时限。却在政客特意耍弄下,模糊不清,再加上人民本身无知,因此造成这模样的慌张。

大家包挂我对客服热线操作不习惯,所以,不知如何是好。

据报道Bintango有经销商卖RM29.00 Sarikei RM29.60说泗民成本高卖贵,这非事实因为Petroniaga 已经吸纳所有成本。

火箭队上议员黄秀励是否认同泗民商家的解释?

Friday 29 December 2023

知识就是力量---AHK

知识就是力量—AHK (Malaya, Sabah & Sarawak)
这Youtube 视频有关于“不合理增加砂州国会选区会让东马政党乘机做大?” Astro 本地圈 28/12/2023

选区重划每8年,可以重新检讨。上次是2015年到2023年,正8,砂政府要求符合Cobbold Commission 和IGC Report要求至少35%的联邦席位分配。有专家像黄进发博士和郑名烈就无知的发表说这可能会引起政治动荡。砂这次可能要求增加12个联邦席位。

马来亚人还是把砂看成马来亚13州之一,所有才这么说砂是全联邦拥有最多席位。Astro广播员口口声声中吠叫砂州,砂州,根本就是既无礼,又无知,没有一点丁愧疚感。2021年12月在联邦议会复邦算什么?所谓的国会决定,还有什么价值? 

Sarawa(K), Saba(H)和Malay(A) 堂堂正正的国被参组马联邦。马来西亚其实就是把马来亚更名伪装。砂沙贬成州,是违反国际法,马霸权照做,马来亚人有没有感到可耻。 今天像Astro广播员的马来亚人持着这种傲慢无礼,根本不懂尊重为何物应该不少吧! 

沙砂是跟马来亚联邦,绝对不是跟马半岛11州联邦。马来亚席位从1963年,不断的增加所谓的国会议席到今天是(马来亚)166:56(沙砂)是霸有75%。怎么不说这会造成沙砂两国都想脱马独立呢?

没错,现在,砂拉越华人圈有这种共识和共鸣:【脱马无罪,独立有理】。记得,独立也是砂人固有的权力。砂沙脱马独立是迟早的事.  

说真的,这所谓的‘国会’根本就是为马来亚11州共同体的,跟沙砂根本没有一点丁关系。 沙砂在这所谓的’国会’根本就是大错特错。

以人口来决定联邦席位分配和拨款根本就是违反MA63协议和是致沙砂于死地。马霸权不尊重MA63,一切以马霸权意愿来玩弄沙砂。今天沙砂政府无能,无奈,无心也无脑,活像傀儡,这并不代表沙砂未来的新政府的行为。

60年被殖民,一切都是以马来亚为重/中心,因此很多马来亚人自以为马来亚应该处处都要10份占9份的特权,是合该(应该的)。

Thursday 28 December 2023

到底谁在‘卖砂’?

以事论事,事实求是---到底谁在‘卖砂’?

谁在马联邦体系内,谁都在卖砂。马联邦的整个体系模型模式就是想尽办法殖民砂拉越。

自马联邦开端以来,他们就采取各种殖民手段。

他们以马联邦的名义掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫,霸凌和殖民砂拉越。从来一点都不放松。1966年大陆架法令就是马霸权殖民的进行曲。

1974年,人联党加入砂国阵。砂国阵就是在联邦国阵大阵营内,以英国西敏式的操作:少数服从多数,否则就要面对党鞭。这就是陷阱。

1966年,砂发生宪法危机,马联邦就乘虚而入干预砂内政。第一任首长宁甘是被马的Tunku和砂的Taib Mahmud 和TunHaji Open推翻拉下台的。

即使,砂爱国义士群起反对抵抗不了英殖民者和马来亚狼豺虎豹的摧残下,失败告终。

1974年,石油发展法令和2012年领海法令都是至砂于死地。

2018年改朝换代后,砂火箭队所作所为也都是砂国阵当时走的同一套路。

请问邱先生,砂火箭队和当年砂国阵有差别吗?

今天砂政盟,一面谈自主权,一面接受殖民。砂天然气100%属砂,却自愿分49%股份给Petronas。怎么一回事?

Monday 25 December 2023

Allocation for religion in Sarawak

PRESS STATEMENT
Re: Allocations for religions in Sarawak

See The Star, Wednesday 20 December, 2023

Sarawak funding for religion should stop unless there is transparency and fairness over the matter. Over the years since Unit for Other Religions (UNIFOR) had been set-up, the Sarawak government under GPS had annual allocations to other religions. People of other religions, especially, the Buddhists or Christians seemed happy about it and for 2024 Premier had announced that he had allocated RM110 million for Sarawak’s Unit for Other Religions. 

Deputy Premier, Datuk Amar Douglas Uggah had disclosed that since 2017 the government had approved total allocations of RM341.8 million for various house of worship. 

Over the years, the GPS government was telling about allocations to UNIFOR but how about allocations to Islam or for the propagation of Islam? Was Islam not funded? If not funded, then this is against fairness and a discrimination against the muslims. If been funded, the GPS government is to disclose to the public how much allocations been given to Islam.

If been funded, it is here that I demand transparency and fairness from the GPS government to disclose how much had been allocated to religion of Islam since 2017. I demand transparency and fairness over this matter because the muslims may not feel happy if allocations were only meant for prayer houses under UNIFOR. Non-transparency and fairness in allocations of funds can create racial and religious tensions between the muslims and non-muslims in the state. I hope premier takes this seriously for the peace of the people of Sarawak.  

I also demand transparency in this area of allocations because taxpayers have a right to know where or how their money is spent. This is a legal demand. People should not be made to pay taxes unless they know how their money is spent. It should be legal not to pay taxes to the government when the government refused, failed or could not disclose to public where their money is spent. 

Again, such allocations, if any, to Islam or for projects for Islamic cause should not be more than that was allocated to Churches or to Christian because Christians are the majority in the state. If allocated, it should be more or less the same as received by the Buddhists because Buddhists and Muslims in Sarawak are more or less of the same numbers. If allocations for Islam are more than what Christians can get, this can also cause disharmony among the various races in the state.  

VOON LEE SHAN
PRESIDENT,  
PARTI BUMI KENYALANG 
23 December 2023

Sunday 24 December 2023

Mahathir created all these

WHAT MAHATHIR SAID ABOUT THE MALAYS IS TRUE. BUT MAHATHIR IS ALSO THE MAIN REASON WHY MELAYU TO DAY ARE MUDAH LUPA. LAZY AND RELIGIOUS EXTREMIST. 

Forwarding as received. I don't know who wrote this long and brilliant piece but it hits the nail on the head.

If I am the Prime Minister of Malaysia, I'd feel ashamed.

 In this country, the Malays have it all. The bulk exporters are Malays, the wholesalers of sugar and rice are Malays, there are many Malays in international trading companies, the petrol company President/PETRONAS station operators are all Malays, the highway operators are Malays, the bread and oil flour operators are Malays, almost all the importers are Malays, and the owners AP are All Malays.

Wholesalers and importers of vegetables, food, oil and vinegar are Malays, the vast majority of those with shallow/deep sea fishing licences are Malays, the owners of the largest square metres of rice paddies are Malays, transport and long-distance excursion buses are Malays, water, electricity and gas suppliers are all Malays. And, while professing to be Muslim, even the directors of casinos/gaming companies are Malays. What level of hypocrisy.

With the exception of the coffin, toddy, car workshops and pig related industries, almost all others are 100 percent controlled and occupied by the Malays. 

If I were prime minister, I would be extremely ashamed and self-conscious.

The 2022 budget allocates 97% of funds to the Malay people, and only 3% for other talents. The people are already protesting, especially the Chinese, and they are furious!

The management of the country's largest higher education practice programme, Mara, is Malay, the management of the Pilgrimage Foundation is Malay, the malays are in charge of the provident fund, the Malays are really in charge of the MCA, the country's largest bank is Malay, the train LRT operator is Malay, the owner of mining and manufacturing plants is Malay, and many factories and engineering contractors are Malays.

They are everywhere, occupying all the political and economic fields, what else do the Malays want? Why not, for a change, develop the economy well, unite the people, bring the country into a positive track, and be a good leader? And in the past 50 years, the New Economic Policy has moulded the Malays into first-class crutched citizens, and indeed it has reached the level of ludicrousity.

Why do you still need to look up to the Chinese and other ethnic groups, Prime Minister? Repeating the same mistakes, not using means to divide the people? Is this what the government wants to see?

As the largest ethnic group in the country, after independence, it has deprived the economic, political, cultural, and religious ownership positions, and the government has been cultivating the Malays without doubt, sleeping and forgetting to eat, and meticulously cultivating the Malays for 50 years, but it is still unable to meet, refuses to treat all ethnic groups fairly, and continues to hold power and deceive the law, resulting in corrupt officials and corrupt officials who corrupt all.

For 64 years, the people are yearning, and the government is deceiving itself and fooling the people. Now it is not a question of the Malays, the Chinese, the Indians or the other 30 nationalities, it has come to the moment of national refoection, it is the problem of Malaysia, the problem of the Malaysians, the people yearn for a new Malaysian spirit. Don't blame the other ethnic groups, it is actually the Malays in power who are deceiving the Malays.

If I were prime minister, I would be extremely ashamed and self-conscious.

The monarch of the country is Malay, the Prime Minister is Malay, most Ministers are Malay, and the heads of government agencies are all Malays. The concept of political governance has derailed, the name of the country has been markedly evil, and the spirit of the Malays has been used to blind the eyes of the Malay and hinder the development of the country.

The Malays are falsely rallied in the name of justice, protecting privileges, ethnic status, religion, and imperial power from exploitation and abolition. But the whole country is Malay in power; the deputy is Malay, the chief police officer is Malay, the chief of the army, navy and air force is Malay, the president of the Bank Negara is Malay, except for Penang, all ministers and state chiefs are Malays, the finance minister is Malay, 3/4 of the MPs are Malays, the district/city officials are Malays, and the civil servants are 97% Malays.
        
Malay supremacy is a racist creed that the Malays are the masters of Malaysia, and that the Chinese and Indians constitute ethnic minorities, which provide for the treatment of the Malays by recognizing Article 153 of the Constitution. Of the 32.17 million people, 69% are indigenous Malays and Ibans and Kadazan, 21% Are Chinese and 7% are Indian.

The Malaysian Constitution contains a number of provisions providing for Malay privileges that state that the special status of the Malays and the indigenous peoples of Sabah and Sarawak must be guaranteed. This provision has over the years been contrived, cajoled and downright manipulated to include dominance in Public services, scholarships or grants, and educational or training privileges and almost in every sphere of life in Malaysia. 

Any permit or business licence must be reserved for a certain share to malays and aborigines; unreasonable places for Malays and aborigines for further study in Malaysian universities or educational institutions; Islam as the state religion; control or restriction on the propagation of any other religious doctrine or belief to Islamists; continued retention of Malay reservations that existed before independence, which are distributed only to Malays or aborigines; the national language must be Malay, etc.

In 1970, the Government initiated the New Economic Policy to improve the economic status of the Malays, which referred to preferential policies for Malays and aborigines, including the need for indigenous peoples to have a 30 per cent stake in the economic sphere;

Enrollment in tertiary institutions was originally 55 per cent Indigenous and 45 per cent non-Indigenous, which later became 95 Per cent native; listed companies had to sell 30 per cent of their shares to natives; through privatization schemes, bumiputra businesses were given more access to business and management opportunities; indigenous joint venture programmes were encouraged to achieve the goal of economic restructuring; the Government guaranteed that Malay students would study abroad and cultivate more Malay professionals. Instead of a general upliftment of the country, the government made this a zero sum strategy: Uplift Malay (not necessarily the other indigenous population) at the expense in non Malay. A policy that eventually leads to a lose-lose situation.

The NEP lasted for 15 years and a number of preferential policies played a role in raising the level of education and economic status of the Malays and indigenous peoples. After the expiry of the 1990 period, the Malaysian government proposed a new development policy that never stopped, but it took a total of 40 years. Since the founding of the Malaysia, Chinese are the largest income tax payers in the country, with a total of up to 80% and Indians about 10%. Because of the preferential Zakat system, even millionaire Malays pay little tax. 

If I were prime minister, I would be extremely ashamed and self-conscious.

The Malays should not always seek protection so that they are unable to rely on themselves and hinder the competitiveness and sound development of the country. Many Malays, hyped up by the political sentiment of the opposition, are still desperately defending the preferential treatment and support of the nation. The Malays had in fact monopolized all the domains and, compared to other races, they still considered themselves marginalized and the Malays as weak. This is a big lie that the government propagates. 

Religion is guaranteed, and Muslims pray every day, but wealth does not fall from the sky. Half a century later, having been educated into good and bad work, it is time to change course and face reality and work hard in life.

Why are you afraid of other peoples? The answer is actually very simple, because the government has cultivated the laziness of the Malay people, waiting for the durian to fall down every day, getting it for nothing, and getting used to waiting for work. In order to achieve its ends, the government uses religion to spread racial hatred, to distort the truth, to deceive the small, to do whatever it takes, just to grasp the privileges of preferential treatment and support?

Prime Minister, are you not ashamed? You don't take other ethnic groups seriously at all, will we be a family? How long will it take for the Malays to honest themselves and stand up?

Remember to forward! ❤ ️ 🙏 🏻

Sunday 10 December 2023

Program Pengukuhan...Tahunan 2023

*Hello Comrades,*

*Re: Program Pengukuhan Pertubuhah Politik Tahunan 2023*

*Venue: Pullman Hotel Kuching*

In attendance with me were Vice President Dr. Richard Ibuh and Supreme Council Member, Mr Atet Diego

We have picked a few points from today's talk by ROS. There are 126 complaints last year to ROS about party mismanagement and about takeovers or tussles for control of party, especially, when there were elections in the party. As briefed by the Investigating Officer from PDRM some groups came like helicopters or from nowhere wanted to take over the party and this normally led to instability in the party. They wanted to highjack the party from old members/committees.

ROS don't welcome instability in party as matters could be brought to Court. We understand that well because if matters go to court, ROS could be named as a party in the Suit.

From the talk, it seems that political parties need to examine their party constitutions and any amendments to party constitutions have to be in accordance with advice of ROS and legal procedures in the Societies Act, else the amendments could not be approved by ROS. 

For party to sack and suspend members, it seems that the advice of ROS political parties should have proper provisions for this. PBK's constitution is clear on how to sack and to suspend party members and all amendments been approved by ROS as they were all in compliance with the law and as advised by ROS.

Be advised PBK party constitution was amended not long ago and all clauses were on advice and approval of ROS and in accordance with the relevant laws. I hope members and supporters understand this and we all have to put things to rest and move on.

When ROS answered a question from the floor about the rights of members to complain, ROS gave an important hint to me that PBK has to tighten the party constitution further although I feel it adequate in dealing with desperados or unhappy members in the party. I believe that party has to be stable before we could face our enemies. We could not afford to spend energies and time on internal matters.

Records by ROS showed PBK is among the parties in Sarawak that has a good Report Card and we have to thank our learned lady Secretary General being a good goalkeeper for the party. Secretary General's job is heavy and we need to appreciate efforts been made in "book-keeping" by our Secretary General.

In compliance with Societies Act and directives of ROS all political parties must have a Registered or Certified Accountant to prepare and audit their financial returns each year to ROS in which this been complied by PBK. All our returns never been subjected to any queries by ROS.

It was disclosed that there are political parties that did not comply with directives of ROS and Societies Act that led the party being investigated and been issued show cause letters and warnings by ROS.


God bless Parti Bumi Kenyalang, God bless Sarawak.

Yours respectfully,

VOON LEE SHAN
President
7 December 2023

"Race and Religion"

*Race and Religion Politics*

Sarawakians must understand race politics is a "Politics of Divide and Rule" taught by the British to elite Malays and UMNO. This became the mantra in Malay and Malaysian politics 

For this reason, when Malaysia was formed with UMNO leading or controlling the government, the federal constitution included Islam as the official religion of Malaysia, and the constitution also placed Malay rights as special rights in Malaysia although rights of other people are protected. 

These helped UMNO and Malays able to strengthen themselves against other Malaysian races. They can do this easily in Malaya because they have the numbers and they make sure they could stay together. In crucial times, the Malays could easily be united against other races because race and religion could help to unite them. 

It is hard to deny that Parti Bumiputera had not adopted this strategy to divide Sarawakians further. PB could survive because it has the support of Federal and UMNO over the decades. One could always guess that UMNO didn't want to see PBB be divided or fall and it could be for this reason the late Tan Sri Adenan Satem when he was chief minister, said Sarawak has no need for UMNO because there is already an UMNO in Sarawak. He was hinting PBB is proxy of UMNO or is UMNO for Sarawak 

We could read that the the real mentor of PB was Tun Razak who could have suggested Parti Bumiputra (PB) to merge with Parti Pesaka. Tun Rahman Yakub at that time was known to be very close to Tunku, Razak and Ghazali Shafie 

Jugah was supposed to work with SNAP and Razak could know this would not be good for PB in Sarawak. This was because Ningkan supported Jugah as Governor but Razak and Ghazali Shafie, if we could recall correctly, was against it. Tun Openg was then made the Governor - see the books by Prof Michael Leigh.

Jugah fell into the trap because he was offered to be the President when PB merged with Parti Pesaka to form PBB but not knowing that he has to pay the price that he later on was "forced" to retire from active politics. 

Jugah was made president for awhile only and Tawi Sli was also made CM in early days. This could be the strategy to please the Dayaks. 

After Jugah was no more president of PBB, Tun Rahman Yakub took over. Tawi Sli was also then removed! 

That completed the first phase of Dayak downfall. 

Are Dayaks still blind and deaf not to know the game played by race and religion politics? 

We could only be strong in Sarawak and pull down PBB/GPS, if Christians in Sarawak are united. 

We have to exploit Christian Supremacy in Sarawak and recognise Sarawak has one race only - the Sarawakian Race. 

We still have more than half Sarawakians who are Christians and we have to win the other 14% non Christians in Sarawak to form the government. There is no reason for this 14% non Christians be happy with what is going on in Malaysia and in Sarawak at the moment. They may also wish to agree for Sarawak independence from Malaysia.

If Sarawak could exit from Malaysia, PBB will be weak. At the moment PBB is strong because they know they can have support from UMNO always.

In a democracy, the rule is that minorities need to follow the majority but in Sarawak it was planned that the minority rules over the majority.

In Sarawak there are about 26-28 dayak majority seats out of 82. Even if Dayaks could be united and win all seats, Dayaks will still not be able to be Premier and Govenor of Sarawak. For this reason when you are not able to be in control of the government, you could not put your own people as head of government departments and government agencies.

For coming 13PRN more seats could be created but we doubt that there will be additional Dayak seats be given. This is a divide and rule tactic too. Can Dayak win when Dayaks are only fighting for Dayak interests only? If Dayaks still cling to Dayakism or Dayak interests only, Dayaks as Orang Asal would see themselves become squatters in their own land.

There are many Dayaks YBs who prefer to support PBB for their own survival. Their support for PBB will see Dayaks be split for long time to come and be left dry in their own land. 

*PBK is the only party pursuing the " Politics of Sarawakian Race & Supremacy of Christianity" in Sarawak*

*PBK deserves to be supported to fight against suppression and oppression of Malaya and to bring Sarawak to freedom and independence*



*Voon Lee Shan*
President Parti Bumi Kenyalang
11 December 2023

Thursday 7 December 2023

留马VS独立的拉扯战

留马Vs 独立 拉扯战
针对JamesChin/JC教授的新10点协议,非政府组织/NGOs –马婆罗洲困境基金会,SAS (Saya Anak Sarawak), 沙巴砂拉越澳洲新西兰权力组织/SSRANZ和肯雅兰党PBK便联合声明,评论JC教授在崩坏的马联邦成立60周年提出这新10点协议。

教授总结了沙砂/SS人民对马联邦无数次侵犯和不遵守MA63协议迟迟未实现SS人的梦想进步和繁荣国家的情景普遍不满。我觉得SS人一天比一天清醒,对不公平的对待也一天比一天感到愤怒。

在马联邦内,MA63所承诺的世俗, 多元化权力,婆罗洲化,自治,宗教自由,公民身份都一一被侵蚀。

SS的资源不间断的被掠夺和SS人不间断的被剥削的情况和马半岛不断的进步和繁荣是建立在SS的贫穷上。

马联邦(马半岛的伪装)一直以来,都不履行MA63原本宪法条款像每年向沙巴收税后,40%回馈,都没做到。

1971年推出的新经济政策,就制度化推崇马来族和回教主义至上完全破坏SS所推崇的世俗,多元流政经文教制度。这是无法挽救的冲突,SS唯一的途径就是寻求独立自主一切。

JC教授这10点协议证实马联邦从头到现在都未兑现创建时的承诺。所以,SS人民是时候以联合国赋予的人权1514号的自决权和1541号集体决议权来裁决SS更自由和快乐的美好和光明的未来。

Monday 4 December 2023

为了更自由,更幸福的婆罗洲

婆罗洲先锋报
为了更自由、更幸福的婆罗洲

非政府组织表示James Chin教授的“十点协议”反映了联邦政府未能兑现MA63

James Chin教授提出了“十点协议”。

非政府组织认为沙巴和砂拉越没有任何未来留在马来西亚

2023 年 12 月 3 日

这是沙巴、砂拉越非政府组织——即马来西亚婆罗洲困境基金会(Bopimafo)、澳大利亚新西兰沙巴砂拉越权利组织(SSRANZ)、我砂拉越儿女组织(SAS)和肯雅兰土著党(PBK)的联合声明:

三个非政府组织主席 Daniel John Jambun、Robert Pei 和 Peter John Jaban 以及 PBK 主席温利山发表联合声明,评论JamesChin教授呼吁“重新肯定”沙砂的“十点协议”以及在摇摇欲坠的联邦成立60周年之际,根据1963年马来西亚协议(MA63),沙砂的世俗和多元化权利。

“JChin的十点协议(一)要求立即实现马来西亚联邦对沙巴和砂拉越人民的梦想和承诺;(二)重申沙巴和砂拉越在组建马来西亚联邦时与马来亚是平等伙伴;并重申婆罗洲州属在联邦宪法第1(2)条下的独特地位,有别于1963年马来西亚协议所载的马来西亚半岛11个州属。


它还(三)寻求重申沙巴和砂拉越各自对其领土范围内的资源拥有专属领土权;(四)重申沙巴和砂拉越的每个社区都有权拥有其独特的文化和仪式表达、身份和语言;(五)重申沙巴和砂拉越是世俗国家、多元宗教社会,正如我们的祖先所承诺的那样;(六)并重申所有沙巴人和砂拉越人都是平等公民,并拒绝一切形式的种族主义、宗教不容忍和至上主义意识形态。” (引用:婆罗洲邮报 23 年 11 月 30 日)

他们指出,教授总结了人民对马来西亚联邦政府 60 年来多次持续侵犯其基本 MA63 权利的普遍不满。这些仍然是未实现的“梦想”和幻想。

其中包括非法改变MA63马来西亚的世俗、多元化和多元文化概念、婆罗洲化、自治、宗教自由、剥夺公民身份以及未能按照协议发展和推进沙巴和砂拉越。经济发展不平衡,尤其是马来亚凭借沙巴和砂拉越的资源,特别是石油和天然气而发展起来,而SS却落后和贫困,甚至在基本结构和便利设施方面也没有取得什么进展。

最近,砂拉越电视台的圣诞颂歌节目引发了不满,该节目拒绝了砂拉越教会协会(ACA)将歌曲《O Holy Night》纳入节目的要求,因为官方政策排除了“宗教元素”。 ACA拒绝参加庆祝活动,并发表声明强烈批评审查制度,并维护砂拉越社会的宗教自由和世俗本质。这得到了整个砂拉越的广泛支持,电视台管理层很快就接纳了这首歌。

在沙巴,也存在类似的不满,因为未能履行 MA63 的创始条款,例如 MA63 规定支付(第 121D 条)每年税收收入 40% 的权利,以及许多其他问题,特别是缺乏发展、贫困和“非法”问题。

然而,非政府组织和PBK主席表示,重新确认是否会对马来亚人产生任何影响值得怀疑,因为马来亚人60年来一直逃避遵守MA63,否认沙巴MA63 40%的税收回扣权利就是例证。

他们表示,世俗、多元和多元文化政治制度的概念是沙巴和砂拉越放弃马来西亚真正独立的几个关键基本或基础术语之一。然而,自1971年新经济政策实施以来,这一概念已被改变,并被制度化的种族宗教至上主义(Ketuanan Melayu)种族隔离所取代。

此外,即使联合政府同意这10点,它也不太可能获得反对党的任何支持,反对党由坚定的种族宗教原教旨主义者组成,发誓要废除世俗概念并取代马来西亚作为伊朗或阿富汗风格的伊斯兰教统治者和宪法。这些人还宣称“马来西亚属于马来人”。

他说,教授提出的重新确认沙巴砂拉越权利的10点呼吁实际上证实了马来西亚是在创建时做出的承诺从未兑现或已被删除,因此具有误导性和欺诈性。



Borneo Herald
For a Freer and Happier Borneo

NGOs say Prof James Chin's "10-Point Agreement" Reflects Failure of the Federation to Honour MA63

Prof James Chin proposed a "10-Point Agreement".

NGOs do not see any future for Sabah & Sarawak to remain in Malaysia

3rd December 2023

This is a joint statement by Sabah, Sarawak NGOs - namely Borneo Plight in Malaysia Foundation (Bopimafo), Sabah Sarawak Rights Australia New Zealand (SSRANZ), Saya Anak Sarawak (SAS) and Parti Bumi Kenyalang (PBK):

Mssrs Daniel John Jambun, Robert Pei and Peter John Jaban, the respective presidents of the 3 NGOs and PBK President Voon Lee Shan have issued a joint statement commenting on Professor James Chin’s “10-point Agreement” calling for “re-affirmation” of Sabah and Sarawak secular and pluralist rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) on the occasion of the 60 anniversary of the shaky federation.

“Chin’s 10-point agreement calls for the dream and promise of the Federation of Malaysia for the people of Sabah and Sarawak to be fulfilled without delay; reaffirm Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Malaya in the formation of the Federation of Malaysia; and reaffirm the unique status of the Borneo states under Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution, distinct from the 11 states in Peninsular Malaysia, as enshrined in the Malaysia Agreement of 1963.

It also seeks to reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak each possess exclusive territorial rights over the resources that are within their own territorial boundaries; reaffirm that every community in Sabah and Sarawak has the right to their distinct unique cultures and ceremonial expression, identity and language; reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak as secular states, multi-religious society as promised by our forefathers; and reaffirm that all Sabahans and Sarawakians are equal citizens, and reject all forms of racism, religious intolerance, and supremacist ideology.” (quote: Borneo Post 30/11/23)

They noted that the Professor had summed up the widespread dissatisfaction of the people with the multiple and continuing violations of their fundamental MA63 rights by the Malaysian Federal government over 60 years. These have remained unfulfilled “dreams” and illusions.

They include the illegal alteration of the MA63 secular, pluralist and multicultural concept of Malaysia, Borneonisation, autonomous self-government, religious freedom, denial of citizenship and failure to develop and advance Sabah and Sarawak as agreed. This is starkly heightened by the lopsided economic development whereby Malaya has been developed with Sabah and Sarawak resources particularly oil and gas, while they have been left backward and impoverished with little progress even in basic structures and amenities.

The unhappiness recently flared up over the TV Sarawak’s Christmas Carol programme which rejected the Association of Churches in Sarawak’s (ACA) request to include the song “O Holy Night” in the programme because of official policy excluding “religious elements”. The ACA declined to join the celebration and issued a statement strongly criticising the censorship and asserting the religious freedom and secular nature of Sarawak society. This received popular support throughout Sarawak and the TV station management quickly backed down on the exclusion of the song.

In Sabah, there is a similar dissatisfaction over the failure to honour MA63 founding terms such as the MA63 stipulated payment of (Art 121D) 40% entitlement to annual tax revenue among many other issues especially lack of development, poverty and the “illegals” issue.

The NGOs and PBK presidents said, however, that it is doubtful that the re-affirmation would have any impact on the Malayans who have evaded honouring the MA63 for 60 years as exemplified by the denial of Sabah’s MA63 40% entitlement.

They said that the concept of a secular, pluralist and multicultural political system was one of several key basic or foundational terms for Sabah and Sarawak to give up real independence for Malaysia. However, this concept has since the implementation of the New Economic Policy in 1971 been altered and replaced with an institutionalised race religion supremacist (Ketuanan Melayu) apartheid.

Further, it is unlikely that even if the Unity government agreed with the 10 Points, it would be able to gain any support from the Opposition which is made up of committed race religion fundamentalists sworn to dismantle the secular concept and replace Malaysia as an Iranian or Afghanistan style Islamic Caliphate and Constitution. The same people have declared that “Malaysia belonged to the Malays”.

Mr Voon the PBK president said that it was ironic the Professor had previously criticised PBK for seeking legal advice from a foreign lawyer who declared that Malaysia was a fraud. 

He said that the professor's 10-point call for re-affirmation of Sabah Sarawak rights in reality confirmed that Malaysia was created with promises which never fulfilled or have been removed and therefore were misleading and a fraud. 

He cited the British colonial office as having commented with concern in 1963 that the Malayans' promise that SS would have "accelerated development" in Malaysia was a "false prospectus". 

Mr Voon who filed a suit in the High Court of Borneo in 2021 to declare MA63 invalid, said the process of making MA63 was riddled with illegalities and deceit. 

Legal analysis of the making of MA63 has proven that it was, in fact, a null and void agreement from the beginning. This was because Singapore, North Borneo (Sabah) and Sarawak were still British-controlled colonies and not sovereign states with the legal capacity or competence to make international agreements. This view is supported by the International Court of Justice decision in the Chagos case 2019 and affirmed by the Mauritius vs. Maldives case iin 2021.

If MA63 was a validly made international treaty, it would have been terminated under International law, by the multiple violations of foundational and basic terms of the agreement and rendered it no longer binding. Either way, Sabah and Sarawak have the opportunity to seek independence which would free them to determine their own political destiny and social and economic development without foreign control.

The joint statement pointed out that the 20 and 18 Points were not binding agreements but just an expression of the people's desired terms for the federation. They said that there is no evidence of the agreements being signed with the UK or Malayan governments. According to the British colonial officials, the Sarawak 18 Points were never provided to them. They noted some of Sabah's Points like the "No State religion" stipulation was included in the Federal Constitution.

They questioned whether it was realistic to re-affirm the unfulfilled promises and prolong a union without meaning and benefit when it is so obvious that the agreed objectives of MA63 were never fulfilled but in fact, abandoned for 60 years. They said Sabah and Sarawak should look at the alternative solution of seeking an exit from the failed union.

They called on the respective Sabah and Sarawak state governments to seek a review of SS's position in Malaysia after the PAS party repeatedly rejected the concept of Malaysia as a secular country and the federation's failure to honour what was promised. It is widely anticipated that the PAS fundamentalist party will implement its Islamic Caliphate when it wins power and controls the Malaysian Parliament in a couple of elections time. The NGOs said the review of MA63 (if valid) would be timely and it was essential since it has already long been terminated by multiple breaches of fundamental terms for federation.

Sabah and Sarawak must seek lawful and peaceful means to Decolonise itself and work towards sovereign Independent nations. 

End of Statement  
Signed by 
Daniel John Jambun Bopimafo President 
Robert Pei SSRANZ President
Peter John Jaban SAS founder
Voon Lee Shan PBK President

3 December 2023

Friday 1 December 2023

Petronas 在砂的权限

石油发展法只赋予国油开采权 作者:LianCheng (2023)
古晋,11 月 23 日:1974 年石油开发法案 (PDA74) 并未将其经营或曾经经营的区域的土地所有权授予国家石油有限公司 (Petronas)。

砂拉越法律顾问拿督斯里JC Fong解释说,PDA74仅授予PETRONAS勘探、开采和拥有石油的权利,而没有将土地本身归属于该公司。

“PDA74 从未将土地归属于 PETRONAS。根据《砂拉越土地法》,大陆架上的土地被定义为(砂)国有土地。”

如果石油和天然气枯竭,则有义务将土地归还给砂拉越,为(砂)国家提供决定其未来用途的机会。

“然后我们就可以决定如何处理它。在这种情况下,我们希望利用废弃或枯竭的油井或油田来开发碳储存场所。”

砂拉越正在积极探索将其 1,665 口废弃油井开发为碳储存中心的潜力,这一举措符合砂拉越对绿色经济的承诺。

能源与环境可持续发展部副部长拿督Hazland Abang Hipni博士表示,这些废弃油井有能力储存至少90亿吨碳。

这个数字超过了砂拉越森林的碳储存能力,估计在 7500 亿吨至 10 亿吨之间。

他进一步解释说,上述容量不包括沿海含水层(渗透岩层)所带来的潜力,该含水层也可以作为碳储存介质。

这项碳储存计划预计将抵消该地区的碳排放,同时减少总计60万吨的碳排放,并为砂拉越带来额外收入。

Petroleum Development Act only vests in Petronas right to mine
By Lian Cheng 

KUCHING, Nov 23: The Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA74) does not vest land ownership to National Petroleum Limited (PETRONAS) for the areas it operates or used to operate on. 

Sarawak Legal Counsel Dato Sri JC Fong explained that PDA74 only grants PETRONAS the rights to explore, exploit, and own petroleum, without vesting the land itself in the company. 

“PDA74 never vests the land in PETRONAS. The land in the continental shelf is defined as State land under the Sarawak Land Code,” Fong told DayakDaily. 

In the event of oil and gas depletion, the obligation arises to return the land to Sarawak, providing an opportunity for the State to determine its future use. 

“Then we can decide what to do with it. In this case, we want to develop the sites for carbon storage, by using the abandoned or depleted oil wells or oil fields,” said Fong

Sarawak is actively exploring the potential development of its 1,665 used oil wells as a carbon storage center, an initiative aligning with the Sarawak’s commitment to a green economy. 

Deputy Minister of Energy and Environmental Sustainability Datuk Dr Hazland Abang Hipni said these used oil wells have the capacity to store at least nine billion tonnes of carbon. 

This figure surpasses the carbon storage capacity of Sarawak’s forests, estimated to be between 750,000 million and one billion tonnes. 

He further explained that the mentioned capacity does not include the potential posed by coastal aquifer (permeable rock layer), which can also serve as a carbon storage medium. 
This carbon storage initiative is expected to offset carbon emissions in the region, while simultaneously reduce a total of 600,000 tonnes of carbon emissions, apart from raking in additional income for Sarawak. — DayakDaily

我对James Chin的10点看法

我对James Chin的10点协议的看法
James Chin提出的新的10点协议,好是好,想留马的砂人民肯定会认同。认同归认同,没有强大的民运当后盾,一切皆空。

想脱马独立的人,像我,认为砂需要更激进的新领袖设时限,严厉的要求实践这些协议,不然就上法庭。对付狼豺虎豹就是要用猎枪和围墙;对付马联邦霸权就是法律规范和法庭裁决一切。政治协谈很难。

眼前的情况,砂政盟如何坚持立场才是关键。以砂政盟现有的势力对付马联邦霸权是绰绰有余,可是这政盟都选择退让。 煤气拥有权100%属于砂拉越,可是砂政盟选择慷慨分权给Petronas 49% 股份,这是怎么一回事?砂总理AbangJo 带领的砂政府真的不行。

该做的事,他都没有好好的去做。在2012年前首相Najib撤销【内安法令】后,其实,1966年大陆架法令;1974年PDA74法令和2012年领海法令就马上失效。可是总理AbangJo 有去处理砂这些拥有权吗? 

是的,PDA74 法令在2019年后,已经受到局限和权限。据(Petroleum Development Act only vests in Petronas right to mine – DayakDaily By Lian Cheng) 他们只有开采权力,土地和矿物拥有权全属砂拉越的。
过去联邦霸道95% :砂5%的做法已经无法再新发现的油田用了。现在好像是30%盈利五五分账;70%是给承包商的。有请大家去查证。

1966大陆架法令和2012领海法令,处理好了吗?希望,大家去查证,还有砂人对砂政盟绝不能放松。

过去砂的18点,联邦霸权连想都没想去实践,因为砂人太无知,不够团结,国家和联邦关系也没搞得清楚。现在,James Chin提议的新10点,我认为只有砂民在乎,坚持,捍卫砂权益到底,一寸都不放过,这10点才算数。

我还是我,认为对付狼豺虎豹就是猎枪和围墙;对付联邦霸权就是设时限,法令规范和上法庭裁决一切,别的免谈,就这么办!

砂政盟该办的事

砂政党联盟政府将精力集中在天然气分配的垄断游戏上,而不是废除1974年石油发展法令以收回砂拉越石油和天然气所有权,并废除2012年领海法令以收回砂拉越海域和大陆架所有权(以便砂拉越人民可以恢复 300 海里而不是减少 3 海里)。 GPS政府是“砂拉越优先”吗?

据信,当前首相纳吉废除紧急法令时,马来西亚紧急时期制定的1974年石油开发法和2012年领海法已自动失效,不再具有执行力。砂拉越人民质疑砂政党联盟政府是否不愿与联邦政府对抗,并且为了个人利益而不敢收回砂拉越的所有权。

砂政党联盟的YB和国会议员必须告诉砂拉越人民收回砂拉越所有权的下一步是什么吗。如果他们愿意对此事保持沉默,那么现在是时候就不要再支持他们了。


Sarawak GPS government focus its effort in monopoly game of gas distribution instead of repealing Petroleum Development Act 1974 to get back Sarawak oil and gas ownership and repealing Territorial Seas Act 2012 to get back ownership of Sarawak Seas and continental shelf ownership (so that Sarawak people can get back 300 nautical miles Instead of reduced 3 nautical miles). Is GPS government for "Sarawak first"?

It is believed that when ex Prime Minister Najib Razak revoked Emergency Ordinance the Petroleum Development 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 created during Malaysia emergency period has been automatically null and void and no longer enforceable. Sarawak people questioned whether GPS government preferred not to antagonise federal government and for personal interest is too scared to claim back Sarawak ownerships.

Will GPS YBs and MPs tell Sarawak people what's next on taking back Sarawak ownerships? If they prefer to remain silent on the matter, it is time not to support them.

James Chin 的10点协议

大学教授为沙巴和砂拉越提出新的10点协议

古晋(11月30日):砂拉越出生的学者提出了一项新的10点协议,以取代砂拉越现有的18点协议和沙巴的20点协议。

澳洲Tasmania大学亚洲研究教授 James Chin 表示,他提出的 10 点协议重申了该国祖先对沙巴和砂拉越的期望,以及这两个婆罗洲州对联邦政府的期望。

“2023年是马来西亚成立60周年,因此现在是一个非常独特的机会来回顾马来西亚人的经历。

“我们需要向前看,而不是回头看。如果我们都回顾过去,我们的国家就无法进步。”他告诉《婆罗洲邮报》。他强调,这10点建议是他以个人身份起草的,不代表任何组织。

“在我们前进的过程中,我尽可能多地了解沙巴和砂拉越人民的愿望。

他说:“我认为强调我们希望保留我们独特的文化、传统、语言,更重要的是,保持我们人口的多元化,这一点非常重要。”

钦的十点协议呼吁(一)立即实现马来西亚联邦对沙巴和砂拉越人民的梦想和承诺;(二)重申沙巴和砂拉越在组建马来西亚联邦时与马来亚是平等伙伴;(三)并重申婆罗洲州属在联邦宪法第1(2)条下的独特地位,有别于1963年马来西亚协议所载的马来西亚半岛11个州属。

(四)他还寻求重申沙巴和砂拉越各自对其领土范围内的资源拥有专属领土权;(五)重申沙巴和砂拉越的每个社区都有权拥有其独特的文化和仪式表达、身份和语言;(六)重申沙巴和砂拉越是世俗国家、多元宗教社会,正如我们的祖先所承诺的那样;(七)并重申所有沙巴人和砂拉越人都是平等公民,并拒绝一切形式的种族主义、宗教不容忍和至上主义意识形态

最后三点(八)促请沙巴和砂拉越领导人采取主动,按照开国元勋的承诺,在马来西亚联邦内履行国家自治权;(九)重申沙巴人和砂拉越人决定自己未来的基本权利;(十)并申明为所有沙巴人和砂拉越人建设现代、世俗、民主、进步和可持续的未来的承诺。

“我们不希望马来西亚半岛突然强加一个框架,使人口状况分为穆斯林与非穆斯林,或马来人与非马来人一样。这在沙巴和砂拉越行不通的。”他强调,沙巴和砂拉越必须在很大程度上摆脱宗教、民族和/或种族紧张局势。

“我们希望按照我们祖先的愿望保持世俗。我希望人们使用这个 10 点协议作为 18点协议的后续协议,”Chin 说。

Don proposes new 10-point agreement for Sabah, Sarawak

KUCHING (Nov 30): A Sarawak-born academician has come up with a new 10-point agreement to replace the existing 18-point agreement for Sarawak, and 20-point agreement for Sabah.

James Chin, a professor of Asian Studies at University of Tasmania, Australia said his proposed 10-point agreement reaffirms what the nation’s forefathers had wanted for Sabah and Sarawak, and also what the two Borneo states want from the federal government.
“As 2023 is the 60th anniversary of the formation of Malaysia, hence now is a very unique opportunity to look back at what Malaysians had experienced.

“Rather than looking back, we need to look forward. If we all look back, our country cannot progress,” he told The Borneo Post.
He stressed that he drafted the proposed 10-point in his personal capacity and not on behalf of any organisation.

“I have captured as much as possible what are the wishes of the people of Sabah and Sarawak as we move forward.

“I think it is very important to stress that we want to retain our unique cultures, traditions, languages and more importantly, to maintain our diverse population,” he said.

Chin’s 10-point agreement calls for (1) the dream and promise of the Federation of Malaysia for the people of Sabah and Sarawak to be fulfilled without delay; (2)reaffirm Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Malaya in the formation of the Federation of Malaysia; and (3) reaffirm the unique status of the Borneo states under Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution, distinct from the 11 states in Peninsular Malaysia, as enshrined in the Malaysia Agreement of 1963.

It also seeks to (4) reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak each possess exclusive territorial rights over the resources that are within their own territorial boundaries; (5)reaffirm that every community in Sabah and Sarawak has the right to their distinct unique cultures and ceremonial expression, identity and language; (6) reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak as secular states, multi-religious society as promised by our forefathers; and (7) reaffirm that all Sabahans and Sarawakians are equal citizens, and reject all forms of racism, religious intolerance, and supremacist ideology.

The final three points (8) urge the leaders of Sabah and Sarawak to take the initiative and fulfil the state’s autonomy within the Federation of Malaysia as promised by the founding fathers; (9) reaffirm the fundamental right of Sabahans and Sarawakians to determine their own future; and (10) affirm the commitment to build a modern, secular, democratic, progressive and sustainable future for all Sabahans and Sarawakians.

“We do not want Peninsular Malaysia to suddenly impose a framework where the population situation is like Muslims versus non-Muslims, or Malays versus non-Malays. This does not work very well in Sabah and Sarawak,” he said, stressing that Sabah and Sarawak must remain largely free from religious, ethnic and/or racial tension.
“We want to remain secular as per the wishes of our forefathers. I hope people use this 10-point agreement as a successor to the 20-point agreement,” said Chin.

该做的事,没做

砂政党联盟政府将精力集中在天然气分配的垄断游戏上,而不是废除1974年石油发展法令以收回砂拉越石油和天然气所有权,并废除2012年领海法令以收回砂拉越海域和大陆架所有权(以便砂拉越人民可以恢复 300 海里而不是减少 3 海里)。 GPS政府是“砂拉越优先”吗?

据信,当前首相纳吉废除紧急法令时,马来西亚紧急时期制定的1974年石油开发法和2012年领海法已自动失效,不再具有执行力。砂拉越人民质疑砂政党联盟政府是否不愿与联邦政府对抗,并且为了个人利益而不敢收回砂拉越的所有权。

砂政党联盟的YB和国会议员必须告诉砂拉越人民收回砂拉越所有权的下一步是什么吗。如果他们愿意对此事保持沉默,那么现在是时候就不要再支持他们了。


Sarawak GPS government focus its effort in monopoly game of gas distribution instead of repealing Petroleum Development Act 1974 to get back Sarawak oil and gas ownership and repealing Territorial Seas Act 2012 to get back ownership of Sarawak Seas and continental shelf ownership (so that Sarawak people can get back 300 nautical miles Instead of reduced 3 nautical miles). Is GPS government for "Sarawak first"?

It is believed that when ex Prime Minister Najib Razak revoked Emergency Ordinance the Petroleum Development 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 created during Malaysia emergency period has been automatically null and void and no longer enforceable. Sarawak people questioned whether GPS government preferred not to antagonise federal government and for personal interest is too scared to claim back Sarawak ownerships.

Will GPS YBs and MPs tell Sarawak people what's next on taking back Sarawak ownerships? If they prefer to remain silent on the matter, it is time not to support them.

Wednesday 29 November 2023

砂人有何感触?

砂人有何感触?
拉巴益:有3000 空缺 – 砂明年填补1500 教师 (诗华日报25/11/23)

这怎么一回事?联邦教育部到底怎么了?是否办事能力出问题或是特意制造砂教师短缺的问题。砂政盟要求砂教师和外州比例为 90:10。

我猜联邦霸权就是要’做死’砂要求的教师比例10个教师中,砂必须占9个。因此,联邦霸权就特意制造这种短缺逼使砂【饥不择食】,欣然接受马半岛来的教师。

砂31位联邦议员完全没有发挥维护砂权益的作用。张健仁还好意思问砂政府为什么在砂议会讨论这些问题(某课题)。前线没做好事,后线不得不插手了。

这些政客应该都把砂人当‘死人’来看待。砂人没有发挥多少砂人的本色;没有多少大格局的思维;没有把砂大小事当成一回事;没看重集体权益。个体整天盲目的忙个不停,到头来一场空。是的,砂人太松散,不够团结,所以政党才如此猖獗。砂民普遍都被政党耍得团团转。

拉巴益说砂教育部在2024下半年才可以解决3000教师短缺中的大概1500. 他声言到30/9/2023,砂缺3076名教师:中学819名;小学2257名。在2/2024年,预测819名中学教师短缺会获得解决。到6/2024年,752名小学教师,预测获得填补。之后,砂还有的1505名教师短缺的问题,有待解决,天啊!

拉巴益‘希望’能招聘失业的非教师本地毕业生解决眼前的教师短缺问题,以维持砂90:马10教师比例。他有向联邦教育部“提议使用所谓服务合同雇佣非教师本地毕业生”。

砂NGOs也有百多个是时候发挥作用集体行动创造大力量维护砂权益。砂人要记得联合国赋予的1514个人自决权和1541集体力量裁决砂未来。记得,S4S集合的共识和行动维护砂权益,慢慢走向独立自主一切像新加坡。

Tuesday 28 November 2023

Action now

Actions now
‘We are only asking for what’s ours, Dr Sim says of efforts to claim money from Putrajaya’

The total revenue collected from Sarawak last year was roughly about RM300 billion. The federal development funds Budget 2024 to Sarawak is 5.8 billion (6.4%) though a bit higher than Budget 2023 . 

Besides, the budget promised often was often pickpocketed in Putrajaya. Otherwise, there should not have been so many dilapidated schools, clinics, under-equipped hospitals and poor infrastructure in Sarawak. Were 31 parliamentrary members and the Sarawak government doing their work?

Dr Sim says that the Sarawak government has been pursuing the matter relentlessly. But, is there any result besides negotiating X 2?

Why don’t they set the time to accomplish the tasks or sue the Federal government in court? Do they have the political will to do so?
To deal with carnivore-like federal government, we need strict law, boundary and stringent actions.  

According to Dr Sim, last year, Petronas had the recorded profit of RM90 billion and the dividend payment to the federal government is RM50 billion. Why didn’t Sarawak get a share?

Last year (2022), 8 new oil fields and this year 6 new oil fiedls were discovered in Sarawak waters. AbangJo has finally demanded 50% profit share if Petronas wants to drill oil in Sarawak waters from 2022 onwards.  

The 31 MPs should voice out gallantly with no fear to be qualified and be prepared to reject federal development budget 2025 if Sarawak is not given 20% if not 30% of the federal development fund.

To realise the autonomy of Education and Health, we needs the fund.
To accomplish the tasks, the Sarawak government should set the time or sue the federal government in court.

Friday 17 November 2023

巴团结週不符合砂价值观

巴团结週不符合砂价值观---砂须拿回教育自主权

砂不参加巴团结週是正确的。联邦政府在安华带领下更走样。安华已经走火入魔了。

联邦教育部选边站是愚昧无知的。安华可能🉐到穆斯林吹捧;却失在马联邦非穆斯林的唾弃。 这就是🉐不偿失,后果不堪设想。

马联邦教育本来就办得很不行。在这节骨儿上更乱78糟。

砂倡导和平与和谐价值观。砂可借用其他途径像捐献款项和物质声援巴人民。砂不参加联邦P/巴团结週,我给砂政盟大大的一个赞👍。

砂须拿回教育自主权才从2018年喊话到今天已经5年了。同样的人同样的话,喊了五年,喊的人不烦,听的人是烦死了,质疑砂政盟是否有能力要回属于砂的权力。

最终,我还是认为砂人必须更团结养第3势力从华人区开始来个大突破。

砂人力量一强大起来就可以阻止政党耍伎俩,也可以左右政党安按照民意走向。

一党或联盟独大绝对不是好事,看今天各个政党是否都太猖獗。

人民的1514自决权力量,一做大,联邦政治集团和砂政治集团就不敢玩家家酒,违背民意。

砂人1541集体力量裁定砂更美好,光明未来,大家同意吗?

Monday 30 October 2023

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya 'sick' policies

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya’s ‘sick’ policies

Francis Paul Siah
28 October, 2023
Malaysiakini

COMMENT I wouldn’t dare claim that I speak for Sarawak.

However, as a Sarawakian, I wish to say that I speak for myself, at the very least, and I’m sure, many Sarawakians too on these current issues which I would describe as “sick” instructions and policies from Putrajaya.

How do I know that there is a large cross-section of my fellow Sarawakians who are in agreement with my views at times? They responded in the affirmative to my posts.

Here’s an example. In my previous article on the Middle East conflict, where I urged the Madani government not to take sides but to consider humanitarian aid for all the innocent victims of war, more than 90 percent of those on my contact list, the majority of whom are Sarawakians of various beliefs, stated their agreement.

I’m also happy to mention that a Malay minister from Sarawak also agreed with my neutral stand and for Malaysia to be a peacemaker and help find solutions to the conflict.

I do not have the minister’s permission to mention names, so it would be unethical for me to reveal the person’s identity.

Seriously, why should anyone be surprised that Malays/Muslims in Sarawak are different from those in Malaya? I have written on this matter before and allow me to recap.

In October 2019, I wrote that Sarawak Malays are already a dignified race and they do not need a Malay Dignity Congress like certain Malay groups in Malaya.

To the academicians from the four universities who initiated the event on Oct 6 four years ago, it might be worth your while to learn from your fellow Malays in Sarawak.

I wrote then: “Simple folks they might be from Borneo, but they are already a dignified race. Sarawak Malays must have been riding on the right track of race relations all along.

“Surely, something must be wrong somewhere if a section of Malays in Malaya feel that they have no dignity left or that their dignity has been threatened”, I added.

On another occasion, I wrote that “Sarawak Malays have no interest in ‘Malay Proclamation’, a declaration initiated by Dr Mahathir Mohamad in May this year.

To the Malays in Sarawak, it is not way off to state that Mahathir’s Malay Proclamation is a useless, worthless document which means nothing to them.

Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg was also quick to dismiss the event, saying “I have no knowledge of the ‘Malay Proclamation’.

“How would I know? We are still busy celebrating Hari Raya in Sarawak, and then the incoming Gawai celebration. Why should I be bothered about issues there (Peninsular Malaysia)?” Abang Johari was reported as saying.

I’m rewinding these two events for a reason and that is to remind Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim not to try too hard to be seen as the Malay hero at home and abroad.

There are also Malays/Muslims in Sarawak, and in Sabah too, who have a different perspective about race/religion matters.

Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) may be partners in Anwar’s Madani government, but the prime minister must never think that he could lead Sarawakians and Sabahans by the nose.

No, sir. I believe the people in the two Borneo territories are aware that they have been taken for a ride for too long and I want Anwar to know that many in Sabah and Sarawak (and I am certainly one of them) resent some Malayan politicians in power for this reason.

So, Anwar and all future prime ministers, don’t push your luck too far with Sarawakians and Sabahans.

We know what we want and for many of us, the next best thing to do is to secede - yes, secession, you heard it right. (I know that’s a “bad word” for many who intend to continue milking the rich resources from Sabah and Sarawak.)

When Putrajaya started introducing “sick” policies like now, how do you expect us, in Sabah and Sarawak, to feel?

When you want to force our schools and students to organise the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools from Oct 29 to Nov 3, that must surely be the worst thing to happen in the history of Sarawak education.

Although it has now been clarified that the event is not mandatory in Sarawak, it is bad enough to involve our schools and students in an emotive issue associated with spite, hatred and anger.

And we have to hear the most “Stupid” (stupid with a capital ‘S’) argument from the Education Ministry that the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools will teach students about humanitarian values and to practise empathy.

To the education minister and her staff, there is a word for stupidity in Sarawak. It is called “paloi”. I see no point in arguing with “paloi” ministers and some of their brainless department heads.

However, I honestly doubt that Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek would even dare to plan the controversial Palestine Solidarity Week without instruction from her boss, the prime minister.

I would like to know whether this matter was brought up for discussion in the cabinet before a decision was made.

If so, what was the input from the other ministers? Was the objection to the event, if any, noted?

Make public the names of ministers who had opposed staging the Palestine Solidarity Week. Don’t pretend there was a general consensus to hold the event. I cannot believe that.

What about the other recent “sick” policy from Putrajaya that all government departments should not entertain any letters written in a language other than the national language Bahasa Malaysia?

I’m glad this was quickly brushed off by Sarawak state secretary Mohd Abu Bakar Marzuki that the ruling does not apply to Sarawak.

Not only that, he also said that federal departments have to accept correspondences from Sarawak written in English as well.

The state secretary made it clear that Sarawak civil service can continue to use English in official communications.

Again, why a need for such a directive from Putrajaya, which is not applicable nationwide?

Eleven months in, Anwar has fumbled again and again but each time, I could forgive him.

This time is different. I believe Anwar is trying his utmost to gain international recognition as a Muslim leader, losing sight in the process that he is prime minister of a multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural secular Malaysia.

Just be wary, Mr Prime Minister, when you try to push too hard on race, religion and language issues upon Malaysians, there are the Borneo territories where our beliefs, cultures and priorities are different from Malaya.

The day we cannot take it anymore, I believe we should seriously work out a solution to our fundamental differences. Perhaps, the best way is to exit.

FRANCIS PAUL SIAH is a veteran Sarawak editor and heads the Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS). He can be reached at sirsiah@gmail.com.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Monday 23 October 2023

我怎么认为:邓伦奇--联邦“造王者。。”

我怎么认为:
邓伦奇:联邦“造王者” z砂应提升为“自治”
 
没错,在这时空下,砂政盟现在拥有26个联邦议席稳住联邦联合政府,我认为可以乘机全速在MA63协议规定下的特殊地位要求更高的自治权:列如
一.   立法权
二.砂天然资源 (100%属于砂民的)
三.联邦议席222(我认为马:沙:砂74:74:74否则退出马联邦)
四.宗教自由(永远不变)
五.移民自主 (全权掌握)
六.官方语言 (砂人自决)
七.砂领海领土是12 海里(完璧归赵)
所有属于砂拉越的权益,设时限一一归还,不然,向联合国求公道去。
 
对了,在砂立法议会可制定公投法令维护砂本土自主,“规定关系砂自主自治课题上,赋予砂全民投票权”。
 
嗯,对,在1960年代,砂人被剥夺联合国大会通过的【去殖民化宣言】中1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体人民的抉择。是的,60年前,人联党反殖民争取独立运动,为砂自主自治所做的牺牲和贡献。
 
我完全认同,邓的看法砂立法议会制定公投法的目的就是强大民意力量。是的,公投必须有民意基础,然后,才跟联邦商讨砂独立课题。
 
潘永强博士认为独立课题有触及法律,所有具争议性。我认为潘博士很欠缺MA63,跨政法委员会报考/IGC知识和认知,所有不知道潘是否知道MA63的合法性更更具争议性。我不知道潘博士,政治学者,对Chagos island-Mauritus的案件认知有多少。
 
MA63是国际契约,我相信,有一天,有必要的话,砂倡导砂独立的领袖会向联合国国际法院求审讯要公道去。
 
潘博士认为砂要公投“需要国家同意与允许,如苏格兰要独立公投。。。”必须获得英国的允许。
 
Well,砂跟马联邦的关系有别于英国跟苏格兰的关系:
一.马半岛和砂拉越在千多海里之遥远的距离而英国和苏格兰是在同一块
        土地上。
二.马来亚和砂拉越签的协议充满着争议性而英国和苏格兰签的双方协
         议。
三.砂有固有的权力退出马联邦。砂可以在砂议会完成砂独立程序而苏格兰必须向英国申请独立公投。
 
我认同邓的看法,砂政治领导有必要打造砂民族和开创本土模式以经济和就业生活共同体融合各族。对,对,对,对付种族/宗教主义“最佳的武器”莫过于人民有生活共同点和目标融合在一起。
 
始终,我都认为每个砂民必须肩负这使命一起传播砂拉越民族,大家团结一致以1541号决议集体抉择砂的未来走向。

重拳出击

重拳出击
砂联邦选区重新划分 –选民人数需大致相等
我就针对这组织这标题来说说我的看法。 该文章没声明谁是发言人?
这组织说“选区的重新划分,若不遵守宪法规章的活,那更大的分配不当问题将会出现。。。”它认为砂城乡选区联邦席位选民人数上有很大的落差。这我认同。

它就指出在第15届联邦选举:美里联邦选区有14万3229人数而伊干联邦选区却只有2万8290人。所以当中代表差异是1:5,这表示伊干选区一张选票强度是美里区的5倍。它说在第15届联邦选区,砂的选举商数是6万2680名选民。这商数是砂选民总数÷31砂联邦议席。以该组织的计算,美里联邦议席人数比该选举商数高出128%,然而伊干选民人数比选举商数少了55%。

它说除了乡区以外,砂拉越境内联邦选区的选民人数大致上相等。
它说“根据1人1票的原则,拥有6分1选民的沙砂,已拥有25%的超额代表”。 这种算法必须是在同一块土地上的国家,相等经济发展的前提下是对的。

马来西亚是三国联邦在不同块的土地上,很不相等的经济发展。马来西亚就是马来亚的化名,”一切都以马来亚为尊” 。联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚。议席分配74.78%在马来亚。

如果按照该组织的 “1人1票的原则”,那么沙砂永远是被边缘化。联邦剥夺沙砂资源后,以人数来分配联邦拨款,那么沙砂别想能有跟马半岛相等的经济发展。这“1人1票的原则”,有民主原则吗?

所以该组织的提议是非常不合逻辑的。再说沙砂不是马来亚的一个州属,凭什么是以同一国州的算法。沙砂被强硬的加入马联邦已经是被马霸权绑手绑脚无法充分发挥。MA63协议是不平等协议。砂人照理是要有“一切以砂拉越为尊”。砂怎么会有这样款式的组织“一切以马来亚为尊”像行动党的思维模式呢?

我认为砂崛起这组织的“1人1票的原则”崛起对砂非常不利。我质疑这组织是否外来党的卧底。

一个愚蠢的人

一个头脑愚蠢的人
2024年联邦财政预算案:总理对砂拉越5.8亿令吉的拨款感到满意
(《婆罗洲邮报》2023 年 10 月 16 日星期一)

阿邦佐哈里没有对这种不公平和不公正的分配表示愤怒和沮丧,而是对2024年马联邦预算案中给砂拉越的58亿(6.4%)对着马来亚的876亿(86.3%)拨款则表示满意。

他没有利用造王者的地位向联邦政府施压要求300亿令吉拨款,而是对58亿令吉感到满意和感激。当砂拉越在基础设施和经济发展方面远远落后于马来亚时,他表达他的满意和感激之情是愚蠢和多么阿Q。

     “我要感谢马来西亚昌明政府给予砂拉越的相当大拨款。是的,我
     很满意……当然我想要更多,但也必须记住,这是有其 限制”

联邦政府(马来亚伪装的)从砂拉越掠夺了2000至3000亿令吉的石油天然气收入和其他税收,并只拨款58亿令吉(2024年预算)。我想知道有多少砂拉越人不为这分配感到愤怒和沮丧。

尽管总理阿邦佐是造王者,但他从未要求公平分享联邦发展基金。他他的思考,言行举止都像个傻瓜,怎能不被当傻瓜一样被对待呢?

我希望志同道合的砂拉越人能够团结起来,共同创造一个更美好、更光明的砂拉越。我们需要敢于为砂拉越要求适当份额的领导人,以及主张永远分裂的领导人,因为砂拉越在马来西亚联邦内是不可能有希望获得良好发展。

An idiotic-minded person 

Budget 2024: Premier satisfied with Sarawak’s RM5.8b allocation
(Borneo Post 16/10/2023 Monday)

Instead of expressing his rage and frustration for such unfair and unjust allocation, Premier AbangJohari expressed his satisfaction with 5.8 billion (6.4%) allocation for development to Sarawak as against 87.6 billion (86.3%) allocation to Malaya under the Budget 2024.  

Instead of using the position of a King-maker to pressurise the federal government to allocate RM30 billion, he is satisfied and his grateful with RM5.8 billion. It is idiotic and a Q of him to express his satisfaction and gratitude when Sarawak lags so far behind Malaya in terms of infrastructure and economic development.

     “I want to thank the Madani government of Malaysia for giving 
      quite a big allocation to Sarawak. Yes, I am satisfied … of course 
      I want some more but must also remember that there are 
      limitations”

From Sarawak, the federal government (Malaya in disguise) plundered RM200 – 300 billion in oil-gas revenue and other taxes and allocated RM5.8 billion (Budget 2024). I wonder how many Sarawakians do not feel exaperated and frustrated for the allocation. 

Premier AbangJo, has never demanded for an equitable share of the federal development fund despite being the king-maker. He thinks like a fool, acts like a fool and behaves like a fool and of course he is treated like one.

I hope that the like-minded Sarawakians for change can rally with one another for a better and brighter Sarawak. We need the leaders who dare to demand for the proper share for Sarawak and the ones who advocate secession for good as there is no hope in the federation of Malaysia for the proper development of Sarawak.

Friday 13 October 2023

以色列挑战全球底线

挑战全球底线,以色列种族清洗和屠杀平民  

时间:13-10-2023
来源:西陆网 李雨

种族清洗和屠杀平民这种事情,美国和它的盟友们干过不少。
但从二战之后,所有的国家,即使要干,也是偷摸着干的,因为都知道,这事情,是极端不道德的,是反人类的,是挑战了人类文明的底线。

1968年,美军在越南美莱村发动大屠杀,杀害了504名手无寸铁的妇女和儿童,之后这个事情的策划人威廉凯利中尉被美国的军事法庭裁决有罪,判处终身监禁,虽然几年后就被释放了。

2001年,美国和它的盟友们发动阿富汗战争,2016年开始,维基解密先后发布多段视频,拿出了美军屠杀手无寸铁的阿富汗平民的铁证。
美国对此勃然大怒,对罪证百般推诿,最后设下重重陷阱,逮捕了维基解密的创始人阿桑奇。

当年美国攻打南联盟,疯狂的轰炸贝尔格莱德,首先要做的就是断网断电,让全球无法知道屠杀的真相。

这事情“可以做“,但绝对不可以说。
我在这里举这些例子,意思是美国再怎么混蛋,怎么反人类,也知道屠杀平民这个事情,是极端丢脸、可耻、触犯人类文明底线的邪恶的、不可容忍的行为。
可以说,只要是个正儿八经的国家,这就是基本的、普遍的共识。
但是,只有一个国家例外。
就是以色列。

以色列,是一个极端崇尚暴力的国家,在他们看来,屠杀平民,不仅不是羞耻的事情,反而是一种荣耀。

以色列是二战之后恐怖主义的创始国,美国等盟友们所屠戮的平民加起来都不到以色列的零头。

这个国家,可以说是生于不义,因为起源就是犹太复国主义者,他们以恐怖袭击起家,比较有代表性的两件,一个是1946年7月22日,在耶路撒冷的大卫王饭店制造爆炸事件,造成92人死亡,58人受伤,所有的受害者都是平民。

另一件就是1948年4月10日,大约200名犹太复国主义者袭击了耶路撒冷郊外的代尔亚辛村,杀死了250多人,大部分是妇女和儿童。

在这之后,制造这两起恐怖袭击的凶手,不仅没有受到任何惩罚,而且在犹太人中成为了民族英雄,被万民膜拜!
这就是不以为耻,反以为荣的典型!

从此之后,犹太人在恐怖袭击的路上一路狂飙,疯狂的屠戮平民。
1982年,以色列策划了震惊全球的贝鲁特惨案,遇难平民超过了1700人到3000人,现场惨不忍睹,无数人的头皮被剥了下来,许多男孩被阉割,许多妇女被强暴.......

随后,联合国代表大会将这一事件定性为种族清洗,要惩罚凶手,我们要说的是,虽然美西方集团偏袒以色列,但针对这一事实,没有任何一个国家敢投反对票!
联合国认定以色列的国防部长沙龙需要对贝鲁特惨案负责,对沙龙进行了严厉谴责。

对此沙龙感到莫名其妙,沙龙说你们凭什么谴责我,屠杀平民难道错了吗?我哪里做得不对?

以色列的总理贝京认为沙龙没有任何过错,对沙龙进行了全力袒护,而整个以色列更是将沙龙作为了他们至高无上的英雄人物。

最后,因为强大的国际舆论压力,沙龙不得不愤而辞职,但因为他屠戮平民的“伟业”,在以色列成为了家喻户晓的英雄,随后被全民推选为以色列总理!

看到这一幕我们还有什么可说的?

我说句不好听的,纳粹德国掌握了武力之后,屠戮了600万犹太人。

但是如果掌握武力的是以色列,屠戮的平民后面估计还要加个零!

况且,德国还知道真诚忏悔,但以色列只会认为这是一种荣耀!

所以你看了以色列他们的行为,就知道了他们今天所做的一切。

现在,以色列开始了对加沙的无差别轰炸,以色列国防部长加兰特公开宣称:
我们已经取消了所有战争规则。我们的士兵不会对任何事情负责,也不会有军事法庭。

你知道这是啥意思吗?

以色列的这个话,出现在人类300年以前的历史中,就是在攻城前告诉士兵,只要打下了城市,就可以三天不封刀,你们可以随便杀人,随便抢劫,随便强奸.......
自从人类有了文明这个词,这种行为已经为所有人唾弃!

可是以色列公然鼓励士兵屠城,在全世界面前开历史的倒车!

我们说了,美国屠杀平民,是偷摸着干的。

但是以色列屠杀平民,是公开干的。

他们不仅公开干,而且生怕别人不知道。
不仅怕别人不知道,还要大肆宣扬,让全球都知道他们屠戮平民的“丰功伟绩”!

于是,我们看到了,加沙的一栋栋房屋成为废墟;
我们看到那个男人呆滞的坐在废墟上,旁边是他儿子的玩具熊;
我们看到那个父亲抱着儿子的尸体,在医院里最后的拥抱;
我们看到巴勒斯坦人在废墟中扒出女儿的尸体,充满怒火的咆哮着说要复仇;
........

而以色列笑呵呵的问全世界:你们看我牛逼不牛逼,你们看我干得漂亮吗?
羞耻?

根本就没有好不好,以色列只会感受到无上的荣光。

国防部长加兰特得意的说:我们正在对加沙进行全面封锁。没有电,没有食物,没有水,没有燃气,完全切断!

以色列空军参谋长蒂什勒嚣张的说:我们正在用前所未有的规模攻击加沙,现在没有精准一说,谈论的是数以千计的弹药!

在那一刻,他们都认为自己是英雄。

一年前,乌克兰布查惨案发生后,美国说是俄罗斯干的,俄罗斯愤怒的否认,说要发起调查组进行彻查,必须要查明真相。
现在好了,面对比布查惨烈百倍的屠杀平民事件,以色列却兴奋的举着手告诉全世界:对,这就是我干的!

今天的以色列,挑战的已经不是巴勒斯坦了,也不是在挑战阿拉伯世界,他们是在挑战全人类了。

由于以色列毫无差别的屠戮,仅仅这两天,先后有11名联合国工作人员在以色列的空袭中遇难,联合国的20所由学校改建的避难所也在爆炸中遭到破坏。

以色列根本无所谓,依然是一副你们看我牛逼不牛逼的样子。

联合国终于怒了,说你要打我的脸,打了就打了,还一定要公开的打,打了还要全世界去说,生怕有人不知道。
你这是一点活路都不想给我啊!你这非要是把人往死里逼啊!

联合国人道主义事务协调厅说,自巴以冲突升级以来,加沙地带已有近26.4万人流离失所。
仅仅在过去24小时,仍有大批生活在加沙地带的民众被迫离开家园,总人数已超过263934人。预计该数字还会进一步上升。

联合国已启用位于加沙地带的紧急避难所,为流离失所者提供必要帮助,约17.5万人在联合国近东巴勒斯坦难民救济和工程处的数十所学校里避难。

但现在联合国估计要哭了,他们连避难所都炸!

接着,联合国宣布将对最近巴以冲突升级期间可能犯下的战争罪进行调查,并对违法者追究法律责任。

但是以色列呢?根本不在乎!
因为昨天的数据是以色列炸死了联合国9个人,今天的数据增加到了11个人!

以色列这么干,欧盟也终于怕了!
以往在任何场合他们都要强调一点:秉承我们共同的价值观。
哪怕明知道是假的,这句话也要拿出来说。
现在可好,以色列当着全世界的话,把这句话拿去擦屁股!还要全球直播!
原来是皇帝的新衣,大家一起好歹要演戏。
现在呢?皇帝直接告诉你,老子摊牌了,老子就是在裸奔,你看我的大不大?
以色列说,什么共同的价值观,那就是一泡屎!
估计冯德莱恩要愤怒的咆哮了:
合着你连个逼都不让我装了??

现在,全世界都震惊了,在原来,最反人类的是日本,但日本也不敢说屠杀是对的,日本就是拼命抵赖说他没干过。

现在以色列却是公开搞,明目张胆的搞,还要全球同步直播........
搞完生怕你不知道,怼着你问:看我牛逼不?

但是,形势正在悄然的发生变化!
在以色列的一系列暴行后,欧盟刚举行了外长紧急会议,随后欧盟的外交与安全政策高级代表博雷利说:
几乎所有欧盟外长都支持继续与巴勒斯坦民族权力机构合作,并继续向其提供财政援助。
此时此刻,加沙的伤亡人数正在增加,人道主义形势十分严峻。我们必须支持更多,而不是更少!

在这次巴以冲突发生后,欧盟很快宣布,立刻暂停支付给巴勒斯坦人的6.91亿欧元援助;
但在以色列轰炸加沙后,欧盟即刻转向,宣布不会停止支付援助。

因为我们一定要清楚,在欧洲等国家看来,哈马斯,仅仅是巴勒斯坦的一个组织,并不能代表巴勒斯坦。
而以色列,好歹是国际上承认的一个国家,它居然公然实施反人类罪行,这让所有人都受不了了。

全球对以色列厌恶的情绪,正在不断积累。

而另一边,就在刚刚,阿拉伯国家集体发声不久,伊朗总统与沙特王储兼首相通了一个电话,讨论巴勒斯坦与以色列之间最新一轮冲突局势,主题是“结束针对巴勒斯坦的战争罪行的必要性”。

要注意,这是他们在恢复外交关系后的首次通话。
沙特媒体说,沙特王储申明:我们正在尽一切努力与国际和地区各方保持沟通,以阻止局势的持续升级,我们拒绝以任何方式将平民作为袭击目标。

也就是在这两天,阿拉伯国家苏丹,在与伊朗中断外交关系7年之后,宣布外交关系恢复。

在以色列的不断刺激下,中东的各个国家,一定会再次统一共识,这仅仅是时间的问题。

通过以上我们能看出什么?

以色列这一次对加沙的全面封锁,意图非常清晰,如果进攻沙加打巷战,他们是打不下来的,光沙加城市地下密密麻麻的地道就够让他们遭受惨重的损失。

那么以色列要做的,就是切断一切国际援助,不断的制造人道主义灾难,让加沙的近300万人成为难民,最终被迫离开这座城市,这样哈马斯就失去了生存的基础,然后以色列再来夺取加沙。

至于近300万难民呢?他们爱去哪里去哪里,反正以色列不会管他们的死活。

所以在短短的一天事件,以色列对加沙的超过2500个目标实施了无差别轰炸,整个城市到处是残垣断壁,到处是尸体、惨叫与哀嚎........

加沙,作为一座已经被以色列封锁了近20年的城市,这一次将遭受全面围城+断水断粮+无差别轰炸.......

以色列认为这样做就能彻底剿灭哈马斯。
他们的目标能达成吗?

现在美国发布的最新消息,美国将派出第二艘航母抵达中东支持以色列。

同时,美国还紧急向以色列援助了45亿美元,甚至不惜把给乌克兰的军援挪到了以色列。

哈马斯,仅仅是一个地方武装,战斗力对比以色列那是天差地远。
美国为什么派了一艘航母还不够,还要再派一艘航母?

泽连斯基都公开喊话美国了,说你们这样搞,乌克兰将承受极大压力,时间在俄罗斯那边。

以色列,原来号称自己就可以推平整个中东,现在搞一个哈马斯,就需要美国全力援助?甚至不惜抛弃乌克兰?

因为美国真的怕了,以色列这么干真的是太要命了,这简直就是要逼着中东国家联合起来啊。

所以美国一面紧急援助以色列,一面对媒体喊话警告伊朗不要轻举妄动。
同时纽约时报说,10月10日拜登和内塔尼亚胡通了个电话,强调以色列军方需要尽力避免平民伤亡,否则白宫将不得不面对舆论的反弹。

拜登说你这样干是要坑死我吗?我们民主党的基本盘好歹是白左啊!你让我怎么和他们交代?

但是以色列能收手吗?
收不了手了,我上次说了,自从拉宾被刺杀以后,以色列越来越极端,越来越反人类,这一次居然损失了900人,他怎么可能咽得下这口气。

原来都是他屠戮别人的啊,作为中东小霸王,从来都是他欺负别人,什么时候被人欺负过?

所以内塔利亚胡认为这对他来说是一个集权的好机会,要往死里干。
而以色列的军方放出了狠话,更跟没打算给加沙的平民留活路.......

最后我说下结论吧,以色列这样赤裸裸的、公开的、无耻的挑战全球人类的底线,这样的国家就要凉了!

在今天这个世界上,全球不可能眼睁睁的看着一个国家公然的持续的制造反人类的罪行。

以色列再这么干下去,最后只能是天怒人怨,促使整个阿拉伯世界团结起来,最终越来越多的组织下场。

而无论是联合国,还是美国的盟友们,都将会开始倒戈!

至少,在舆论上再不会有人敢支持它,它首先在政治上会输掉所有的资本。
因为这是人类文明社会最基本的底线!
以色列终将众叛亲离。

前两天,经常有人问,为什么巴勒斯坦人,他们明知道有去无回,明知道不可能活下来,他们为什么还是要搭乘滑翔伞飞向以色列的军营?

你去看看那些加沙失去家园和孩子们的人,答案不就很清楚了吗?
加沙,是不会屈服的!
(责编:李雨)

Friday 6 October 2023

Wong Pak Ming: Independence is the best option for Sarawak

Wong Pak Ming said:Independence is the best option for Sarawak
黄拔明先生说:独立是砂拉越最好的选择
https://sg.docworkspace.com/d/sIGqsiMu_AZGTgKkG?sa=03&st=0

 坚信独立是砂拉越能够进步的最好的选择。我有许多令人信服的理由,最重要的是发展。 

马来西亚联邦成立 60 年后,尽管砂拉越贡献了这些年来该国的大部分收入来自出口,来自砂拉越的石油和天然气。 然而,与马来亚半岛相比,今天,砂拉越就像一个乡村小镇,道路、设施和设施,和工作机会都有限。但就石油和天然气出口收入而言,对于我们这所谓最富有的邦国来说这是羞耻的。

在这本书中我为砂拉越的发展提出策略和计划,以令人信服的理由说明独立不仅是可以实现的,而且砂拉越将如何变得更加繁荣。

( I firmly believe that independence is the best option for Sarawak’s 
progress and there are many compelling reasons, foremost being development. After 60 years of federation within Malaysia there 
is still so little development in Sarawak despite it contributing the 
bulk of the country’s revenue all these years through the export of oil and gas from Sarawak. When compared to peninsula Malaya 
today, Sarawak is like a rural town with limited roads, amenities and 
job opportunities which is shameful for supposedly the richest state.
in terms of revenues earned from oil and gas export. In this book, I have put forward strategies and plans for Sarawak’s development and 
compelling reasons why independence is not only achievable but also how Sarawak would be more prosperous as a result.)

大雾散去。。沈振仁

我看,我听,我思 –读后感
大雾散去,梦醒时分,继续装睡或是面对? 沈振仁

马联邦今天政治局面验证政治真的是什么都有可能的艺术。对呀! 在政治利益考量下,仇家都可以拥抱在一起。马联邦联合政府就是最佳的写照。

马来西亚就是马来亚跟砂国有千海里之遥远,之间肯定没有唇亡齿寒之关系。砂没马联邦肯定明天会更好。可是,马来亚没有砂日子怎么过。

砂政盟自2018年脱离巫统国阵魔掌后成为独立政体成为“造王者”。马来亚今天的乱局是天意和人祸,是巫统国阵从不信正轨正道办理正确的公事。

嗯,人联党在4/6/1959,创党以来初期是以反殖民争取独立为主轴。在70年代加入砂国阵后,就开始大逆转,弄得自己里外不像人,被人民唾弃。

说到砂S4S的崛起来由是在2011年因Najib上任当首相后,担任联合国某职位必须废除内安法令。 砂S4S就大事宣传砂历史和大公开了MA63。

已故Adenan Satem, 在2014年正式上位后,非常支持S4S。之后,砂政盟斗争的大方向,争取砂的自主权变成人联党的救命符。

在1978年,马火箭进驻砂。经过18年经营,在1996年,就有三支火箭射入砂议会。人联党,相对论,走向堕落,给人印象就是为Taib 做帐。

从1996年起经历大起大落。在2021年竞选26席位只险胜2 议席。

对呀,试问砂行动党在砂45年,对砂有何贡献?是有扮演好反对党角色,但对向联邦争取权益,没有一点丁作为。反而,有倒米记录。

停留在空气中承诺不断回响循环,希盟1.0和今天希盟2.0,落实令人厌恶的事项。

人联党创党初期,有着左翼思想,逐渐的越走越右,到左右难分,又一次向右定位。党也有命运共同体,行动党也有人联党的过程,但是,。。。

砂政府争取自主权是势在必行。现今砂政盟也开始努力提升内陆基建措施。砂政府在AbangJo带领下逐渐走上正轨,多项领域也获得多方瞩目。

行动党未来最大的敌人是砂本土反对联盟,目前,是肯雅兰党领先。

谈周的分裂牌和区域牌

谈周长佑的分裂牌和区域牌

周长佑严厉谴责人联“上瘾式”分裂国人各族。(诗华日报4/10/23)

我以一个砂人的立场看周的论点,我真的觉得周长佑很幼稚和神经过敏。

这分明是M4M对冲S4S:马来亚人的马来亚对着干砂拉越人的砂拉越。

人联强调S4S,是天经地义的事。砂人本来就是要以砂国为中心。

马来亚以马来西亚国名义还不是以马来亚区域为中心。庆祝831是最佳的写照。

马联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚区域。周和其他砂火箭队连吭一声都没有。安华首相2023年,联邦拨款砂拉越只有5.6%。这分明就是殖民者的霸权作为。

今天,人联砂政盟的成员坚持争取更公平权益。以砂拉越优先,砂财富属于砂人共有的,有错吗?

马来亚以马来西亚国的名义不间断的掠夺,剥削打压,抢劫霸凌和殖民砂拉越。周怎么如此无感。

砂人联-G P S团队强调砂身份和特点,有错吗?哪里搞分裂?

马来亚的计划是马来亚化洗脑,意图抹掉砂民砂身份和特点。就是去婆罗洲化以马来亚化砂拉越。这周怎么不认为马来亚搞区域牌呢?

周不只幼稚,还中M4M毒太深,所以受不了S4S的人联。

马来亚就是以马来西亚国的身份压缩砂拉越。周却跟马来亚翩翩起舞。

众所周知,周的政治仕途是建立在M4M的基础上,然而S4S却严重摇动其地基。

人联-GPS终极目标是自治权,哪里有空间搞分裂?

砂本土反对党,以肯雅兰党领先,真的是脱马独立为主轴。砂人是以1514号决议决定砂未来。最后,送上SLM的铭言绝句:脱马无罪;独立有理赠送给砂人。

Thursday 5 October 2023

两位主讲者不赞同砂独立

主张 在 大马框架 争取自主权                                          

两主讲者 不赞同砂独立 (诗华日报 2/10/23)

诗巫华团,主办这场演讲主题为【绿潮 冲击下 马来西亚的 政治格局 及 演变】。主讲者是政治领袖邓伦奇和政治学者潘永强。美中不足是没邀请倡导砂独立知名人士好像肯雅兰党的主席温利山,秘书长刘秘秀,或SLM主导Thomas Kiew 或准候选人Josephine Lau. 这样,邓和潘就可以眼界大开知道砂独立后的种种好处。

两位主讲者赞不赞同砂独立根本不重要,因为砂独立不独立是大部分砂人说了算。马来亚人根本没有资格在砂比手画脚,说三道四。

邓,人联元老,谈独立不独立犹豫不决,吞吞吐吐,不能立马下判断。

潘,马来亚人,外人,不赞同砂独立,立场搞笑。讲一大堆废话,如果独立,那么不好,那么,马来亚为什么向英国争取独立呢? 在知识和认知都不足,没有做足功课下谈砂独立的【弊】,很损自己。

其实,联合国是鼓励有资格独立的国家争取独立。在14/12/1960年,联合国大会通过【去殖民化宣言】中的1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体决定权下耀:一。独立;二。联邦;或 三。合并

争取更大的自治权是人联和砂政盟要在马联邦内的终极目标。本土的反对党,我相信有一天会成立【砂本土反对党联盟】争取的是脱马独立,向新加坡看齐。砂拉越跟马半岛相距千多海里,本来就不是违反自然结合。

说“现有马联邦已经60年,基础也打好。。”,我知道的是马来亚就是以马来西亚联邦的名义,违宪的不间断的掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫,霸凌和殖民砂拉越的基础。

邓说真正独立很辛苦。那么被马来亚殖民,难道不辛苦吗?

说“砂地处 南中国海关键战略地带,列强虎视耽耽,猜不透邻国的想法”。砂独立,如果会有列强的威胁和邻国的入侵,那么联合国,还有存在的价值吗? 新加坡和文莱,为什么还稳稳当当的生存着?

潘说独立是很贵的,要买飞机,火箭,大炮,要设国防力量等等。Well,砂不独立更贵。每年被马半岛剥夺2,3千亿的税金来开拓砂拉越是绰绰有余的。关于管理国家,处理种族和宗教问题,不必潘担心和操心。咱们肯定不会像马来亚陷入种族和宗教的泥泽中。
说新加坡李光耀含泪离开马联邦,那是一般人的看法。其实,李在他回忆录中有清楚的交代脱马过程。经过密室谈判后,东姑有在两份协议书上签名:分离协议书和独立宣言书。

可惜,潘没机会听听本土在野党和人民论述砂独立后的种种好处。

Tuesday 3 October 2023

PBK should contest N67 Jepak by-election

*PBK - PARTI BUMI KENYALANG SHOULD CONTEST THE N67 JEPAK BY-ELECTION IN BINTULU.* 

The politics of Malaya and Sarawak from the time the Federation of Malaysia has not brought any significant progress and developments to Sarawak, especially to the vast rural areas. The citizens are still living in poverty and lack the basic infrastructure and amenities. This has been a period of 60 years. Are the people of Sarawak going to remain the same for 100 years?

For as long as we are governed by the present ruling regime in cahoot with Malaya, Sarawak and its people will never see any better developments. One political scientist has emphasised that Sarawak is 100 years behind in developments compared to Malaya. This shows the terrible lack of fiduciary duty to Sarawak. So why should Sarawak remain in the Federation of Malaysia? In the future to come Sarawak will be an independent nation, so why should we wait. Now is the time. Sarawak people are more than capable of governing the country much better. We could have much better roads all over Sarawak by now. But look at the conditions of roads in rural Sarawak. Sarawak people should not be too naive about the conditions of developments in Sarawak. The Pan-Borneo Highway should be Four-Lanes on either side to call it a highway. 

Sarawak should demand self-determination. We have enough of the hegemony of Malaya and GPS Sarawak. The struggle, as charted by PBK for Sarawak to be independent, is the only choice for Sarawak to become a great nation and country.

For the by-election for Jepak, PBK should contest the election. The struggle for Sarawak independence should be prompted wherever possible and in whatever opportunity. The people of Sarawak must and should start to advocate for Sarawak Independence. PBK is the one and only political party that advocates and fights for Sarawak Independence. 

The people of Sarawak must now wake up to see the future of Sarawak as an independent nation. Sarawak should have been a much more developed country if we had been independent. Look at how Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, which is now a developed nation. 

Being in the Federation of Malaysia has actually made Sarawak to be a colony of Malaya. 

The people of Sarawak must support PBK so that Sarawak can go for self-determination and independent state.

Prof Dr. Richard Ibuh
Vice President
Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Was Malaysia formed by way of fraud?

*WAS MALAYSIA FORMED BY WAY OF FRAUD?*

In rural areas, not many have yet ever heard about MA63 and even in towns and cities in Sabah and Sarawak, many people never heard about MA63.

Legal opinions in UN Secretariat 
clearly mentioned that Malaysia is not a new nation but a nation with a change of name to Malaysia. This means Malaysia is Malaya and Malaya is Malaysia. UN secretariat legal opinions are also of the opinion that SSS were gifted by UK to enlarge Malaya. Tunku in a book titled Conversation with Tunku Abdul Rahman at page 86 also mentioned Singapore Sabah and Sarawak were a gift to Malaya and Tunku also wrote a letter of thanks to the Queen for the gift.

 Therefore, it was a fraud because there was no referendum at that time for people of Sabah and Sarawak to decide for themselves whether or not they wish to join Malaya to create Malaysia.

UK and Malaya cleverly overcome the need of a referendum to settle this issue by circumventing United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 of right of colonized countries for self determination by way of assessment of 4000 odd Sabahans and Sarawakians by the Cobbold Commission and came with a doctored report to say peoples of Sabah and Sarawak wanted Malaysia. How could these 4000 odds could represent the voice of 1.3 million Borneo people at that time? 

Please read the book by Prof Michael Leigh the demands by Tunku that Cobbold Commission Report must show that peoples of Borneo Territories wanted Malaysia.None of the members of Cobbold Commission could speak and understand the native languages of Sabah and Sarawak and most of our people were illiterate and could not at that time understand English. They could not understand the purpose of the Cobbold Commission which came with a report within weeks only. How could they able to travel the length and breadth of Sabah and Sarawak to find the true wishes of the people?

There are evidence in our hands that those who disagree with MALAYSIA were arrested and tortured and branded as terrorists and communists. They had to save their lives and hid themselves in the jungle and took arms to defend themselves. To take arms to defend yourself against being killed is legal under domestic and international law. 

Sokarneo and the Philippines were against MALAYSIA and this caused the border wars in 1960s which also led to peace settlement by signing the Manila Accord with a promise by Malaya to hold a referendum but until now this was not fulfilled.

Records also showed that officials from the United Nations were "handpicked" to agree with the Cobbold Commission Report. A guy was said known could be bribed.

When fraud was involved in the creation of Malaysia, we could not allow the dead child Malaysia be revived. In law, the law could not help any fraud.

Although in the federal constitution etc it mentioned that Sabah and Sarawak are federated with Malaya or helped formed Malaysia, but in reality, politically Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. 

Malaya controls parliament and the federal cabinet and controls the state government by proxies in past 60 years. Malaya also have political parties from Malaya like PKR, PAS, Bersatu, DAP, MUDA fighting for seats in Sabah and Sarawak. Seats won by them are seats taken away from Sabah and Sarawak. 

Sabah and Sarawak are only given 56 out of 222 MP seats. 

At the moment, not many could be bothered to say MA63 is a fraud or that Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. At the same time, not many feel the pain of loss of marine wealth, oil and gas and natural resources being taken by Malaya because things are not from their pockets.

Under international law, colonizers have the legal right to impose their wills on their colonies including their religion and imposing their culture, language and administration on the colonised. This gave rise to slavery by colonisers against the colonized. Please see Africa until now.

PBK has no means at the moment to set the matter straight due to lack of support, manpower and fund. It is the people's power that is important in politics. I personally believe time will come people will seek justice in the streets and there will be a peaceful revolution against MALAYSIA or the federal government. We have seen this in many African countries and even in the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand had "tasted" street revolution.

 You couldn't seek justice in many matters in Malaysian Court and I had discussed this with an eminent foreign law professor and a foreign judge.

Voon Lee Shan 
President Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Monday 2 October 2023

司法独立

保障民众权利应修法完善司法独立---古威星

司法独立纯粹是为了保护个人和社区司法独立得到保障。让公众获得公平审判。法官公正不阿依法处理案件。

古威星是砂律师公会主席在13/1/2023,沙砂司法年席开幕致辞时如此表示。

说实施司法独立,同时也必须保护法官。法官授予决策权是为保护公众对司法机构的信心。

为了实现更完善司法独立,律师公会认为,有必要修改2009年司法任命委员会法令和联邦宪法,确保各机构:立法;司法,行政,辩护人之间的明确权力。

有必要修改2009年司法任命权的第27条文,以消除首相赋予委任4名最高法官,联邦和上诉庭法官的权力。

还有,联邦宪法第122B条文取消首相向国家元首任命联邦法院,上诉庭和高等法官提出建议的特权。

还有,还有,就是修订2009年委员会法令第5(1)(f)条文,修订首相持有委任4名知名人士担任司法官和委任9名成员组成的委员会的特权。

取而代之,应该是委任利益相关者,其中包括马联邦各个律师公会和律师。我认为NGOs也可以加入组成这委员会。

同时,当然,公民有必要知道自己本身的权益和义务,才有机会伸展正义。

改进就要从总检察长办公室开始。该办公室有必要在网上公布所有相关法律,以方便人民轻松查阅。

Saturday 30 September 2023

公平选区拨款---蓝志锋

公平选区拨款---蓝志锋

希盟的[竞选宣言]---朝野公平拨款。现在,安华首相却要求在野党必须坐下来跟政府谈一谈,否则,连门都没。

不管是执政或在野区,人民都是纳税人,怎么可以玩起大小眼。那是过往9任首相的放纵玩法。他们的宣言本来就没有这么承诺。

然而,所谓的昌明政府希盟的宣言就这么明确的说明。现在,要玩不昌明做法,谁不火大?

是的,自称昌明政府在Zahid 的DNAA法定有罪的撤销他47贪污罪案后,其实是元气大伤。

竞选宣言是朝野公平拨款到现在犹豫不决。不遵循承诺会是另一致命伤。

是的,安华有顾虑,怕拨款或被滥用来攻击希盟。

其实,公正党以公正标榜,领头羊安华必须走正道对抗歪门邪道。

非常认同蓝的看法,以改革定位的希盟应该建议公正公平游戏规则。往后,不管自家是在位或下野,保证政治生态环境是良善的。

民主进程是往更好的大方向发展。有公正公平游戏规则可以让严重脱轨的马联邦政治重新上进步,发展和繁荣的规格。

有NGOs和全民看管朝野拨款用途,拨款哪里会被滥用?

沙砂已经被拉下水60+年,不管怎样,我还是我,认为脱马独立是沙砂最佳的选择。

Friday 29 September 2023

砂行动党风雨45年

砂行动党风雨45年---邱汉明

是的,来自马半岛的火箭党从1978登陆砂拉越至今已经有45年风雨历史。

从无到有,是否会从有到无,在本土意识高涨的年代,这就得看砂民怎么选:S4S或M4M,也是未来砂人的抉择。

改革从华人区开始。来日,本土反对党联盟肯定是砂火箭的克星。

从1978年至2021之前,砂火箭的确是“一枝独秀”。

在2021年,砂等12届选举是砂火箭队从所未有的挑战。
难怪方寸大乱,一口咬定砂团结党和其他本土反对党是砂政盟委派来搅局者。大耍苦肉计,以博同情。

没错,反对党的天职是监督政府。

是的,一个勤政爱民,实施利民政策,有效率,公开透明,廉洁政府,再多反对党也不惧。

砂火箭在1996年,总于终止砂政府一言堂的情况。

砂火箭队在砂议会的确有扮演好自己的角色,辩说一流。

是啊!朝野选区,纳税人都有还税,没理由边缘化反对党选区。

与其说安华是全民首相,不如说他只是马半岛首相。

2023年,财政预算案,发展拨款990亿令吉,869亿或87%多是给马半岛。砂只配给56亿或5.6%.

每年从砂剥夺石油和天然气加上其他税收是高达两,三千亿,给回的就那么一点点。怎么回事啊?

说安华会在北马4反对党州大量拨款致力解决66年吉兰丹食水供应安全问题。好啊!等一等,有行动,做到位了,才算数,不然都是一场空。

与其说做为全砂民的总理应该向安华看齐,不如请求安华联邦发展拨款对砂拉越不可以有如此大的落差。确定安华在反对党区大量拨款,然后再谈向安华看齐。别太焦急美化安华。

Thursday 28 September 2023

砂拉越人的公民课

砂朥越人的公民課
1. 馬來西亞沒有東馬,也沒有西馬。只有砂朥越,沙巴,馬來亞。

砂朥越人的祖國是砂朥越。
2. 我們沒有中央政府和州政府,只有聯邦政府和砂朥越政府。
3. 我們是砂朥越人(Sarawakian),不是馬來西亞人(Malaysian)
4. 出國時候,在填寫入境表格要註明自己的國籍是Sarawakian
5. 目前的州議會應該更改為 砂朥越議會(Negri council)

Negri在砂朥越土话是国的意思。

6. 我們沒有國父,只有開國元君 Sir James Brooke。
7. 砂朥越的誕生日是1841年8月18日,也就是國慶日。
8. 1841年9月24日是Sir James Brooke 加冕為王,也就是君主登基日。
9. 1963年7月22日是英國給砂朥越的獨立日,實際意義上應該是光日。
10. 砂朥越的國旗是十字皇冠旗,目前的州旗是殖民的象征。

Jalur Gemilang 是馬來亞國旗或者聯邦旗。非官方場合砂朥越人不應

該升起聯邦旗表示自己認同聯邦。
11. 砂朥越的國徽是十字盾牌皇冠和野獾。犀鳥州徽也是被殖民的象

征。砂朥越人不使用兩只老虎的聯邦徽章。
12. 砂朥越的國歌是 Fairland Sarawak, 州歌 Ibu Pertiwi 也是殖民象征。

Negaraku 是馬來亞國歌或聯邦歌,在正式場合播放聯邦歌,砂朥越

人可以選擇不唱聯邦歌,因為砂朥越人不應該歌頌聯邦的存在。

Wednesday 27 September 2023

What is the meaning of Radzi Jidin....?

WHAT IS THE MEANING OF RADZI JIDIN GOVERNMENT'S PMX THAT FREES CORPORATIONS? THE STORY OF HOW MUHYIDIN AND THE RADZI GOVERNMENT RECEIVED RM500 MILLION FROM MUSA AMAN

  1. In November 2019, Musa Aman was detained by the MACC and finally on 23 May 2019, Musa Aman was charged with 35 charges related to the awarding of the state timber concession contract.
  2. He was finally charged with 46 charges involving abuse of power and corruption as mentioned above.
  3. After Sheraton's move, after Muhyidin became Prime Minister, he knew he needed the support of more parliamentarians to stay in power. He knows that UMNO cannot be trusted and if UMNO withdraws, then Muhyidin Yassin's Government will truly be called a failed Government.
  4. At the same time, UMNO also conspired not to want to be with Bersatu, but being the Government is better than being the opposition. So they agreed.
  5. For that, Muhyiddin Yassin needs someone in Sabah to convince everyone in Sabah whether from PH, BN, the Government and the opposition, to support Muhyiddin Yassin and the Government at that time.
  6. The person who is known to have the funds and strength is none other than Musa Aman.
  7. So with the case, Musa Aman consulted with Muhyidin. Not only will he help "buy" members of Parliament and the Sabah state government, he will also pay a sum of money to Muhyidin Yassin.
  8. The amount referred to is RM500 million. A fraction of the amount is RM200 Million for the purpose of buying members of Parliament and members of the Sabah State Assembly and the rest will be given to Muhyidin Yassin to drop 46 cases of Musa Aman.
  9. From here several events happened.
  10. On 9 JUNE 2020, Musa Aman was acquitted of 46 charges. The high court freed and released (DAA) Musa aman after "Deputy Public Prosecutor Datuk Azhar Abdul Hamid, that the prosecution withdrew all charges against Musa."
  11. Meaning, the AGC has given instructions for all charges to be WITHDRAWN, before the case is tried.
  12. AGC is Idrus Harun appointed on 6 March 2020 by Muhyidin Yassin.
  13. Once the first step has taken place, then the second step has taken place, which is to take over Sabah.
  14. A month after that, on July 30, 2020, Musa aman got 33 Affidavits stating that he had a majority and the Shafie Afdal Government had fallen.
  15. Shafie Apdal refused to submit to the matter and finally announced the Sabah election in September 2020
  16. The RM300 Million was handed over in CASH to Hamzah Zainuddin who at that time boarded a private jet in JUNE 2020 to go to Sabah, supposedly for a meeting on official business.
  17. It happened, a few days after the Musa Aman case was dropped. Hamzah went to Sabah, not just to see for himself the progress of the purchase, but to bring the cash back to his President in Kuala Lumpur.
  18. At that time, Hamzah Zainuddin was a Minister at the Ministry of the Interior (KDN)
  19. This incident of "buying an assemblyman" was revealed by Sahfie Apdal who accused Hamzah's presence in Sabah in June 2020 to buy members of the Sabah state assembly to jump. Safie also did not know that a sum of RM300 million changed hands from Musa Aman to Hamzah to Muhyidin Yassin.
  20. That is why, when PMX mentioned that this was the work of the National Alliance Government when they were in power, Radzi Jiddin continued to be angry and torn. They know, their secret has been revealed!
  21. Now you know why Radzi Jiddin is torn. Because he also knows the sum of RM300 million and the release of Musa Aman.
  22. Because of that, they dared to accuse PMX of interfering in judicial matters, because they were the ones who actually did the matter.

  Can you see who really intervened in the case of release? Spread it!

Monday 25 September 2023

S4S Vs M4M

人联,火箭和本土反对党就是S4S和M4M之争

S4S是本土主义,是趋向,也是主流。S-DAP能逆向而行吗?所以,我认同邱的看法砂火箭必须“拥抱主流”求生。

M4M是有利于马半岛。看联邦拨款87%多在马半岛。4-5%多而已在砂拉越,这分明是恶毒特意压制砂发展。

砂人的智慧不差,砂火箭应该知道自己在砂国的定位和前景吧!

砂政盟的联邦观是要求他们尊重MA63.

新一代人联党代表都不赖,都很努力服务人民,很S4S.

S4S的砂民带动砂政盟走向S4S。现在未来永远都是以S4S为主,没有M4M的空间。所以,人联党怎样都不会陷入苏想象的空间。

M4M任由马联邦(马来亚)继续掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫,霸凌和殖民砂拉越。这是60年来去的真相实况。

S4S是终止马来亚政府以马来西亚联邦名义继续殖民砂拉越。

有必要把MA63协议纳入学校历史课

有必要把MA63协议纳入 学校历史课,以让学子知道马来西亚联邦成立的正确的历史事实。

原来,1982年之前砂拉越历史在马联邦历史课本几乎是空白的。

在2014之前,对砂历史也提不多,就怕大家多认识砂拉越。这就是巫统国阵特意要掩盖成立马来西亚联邦的历史事实。

Hasidah 认为历史就是发生过的事实,有必要准确的告知今天年轻的一代。

据我所知,马联邦的成立不值得砂人感到骄傲的。它是在残杀压制无数砂爱国义士后,冲冲忙忙成立的。很多问题到如今还是吊挂着。

事到如今,马来亚政府再也遮盖不住历史和事实。

2011在Najib当相时内安法令被取消。2012年二月生效。砂民运就立马崛起。

民运的火焰正燃烧不已,当时砂首长Adenan Satem 更应合民声重提砂为邦国地位。

MA63才大公开。马来亚政府再也压制不住咱们砂民运。

那时Najib 为了配合联合国某职位的要求下,只好取消那恶法。之后,Najib 这恶人又以SOSMA 替而代之。

因此才有2014和2017, 联邦政府在历史教课本上来做改革。

他们才考虑邀请砂本土历史学家为参考制定历史课程。

今天,Hasidah 提议把MA63成立马联邦纳入学历史教课本内以让马联邦孩童知道历史和事实。好也,我是举手鼓脚称赞她。

砂需要建历史中心

砂拉越需要建历史中心

是的,砂需要历史中心专门机构管理和发展历史文件和遗产。

砂总理属---副部长Sharifah Hasidah (法律,MA63和砂--联邦关系)在2023年9月12日出席2023年砂拉越历史国际大会活动时如此表示。

她说砂历史研究存在很多空白处特别是历史悠久的远古方面。

她说尼亚石洞发现的人类骨骸证明早在大约5万年前就有人类存在婆罗洲,特别是砂拉越。

她说砂拉越被喻为东南亚考古坑。他们已经确认这些考古遗址。她认为这些考古遗址必须获得妥善保护留给下一代。

去殖民化决议

去殖民化决议
在14/12/1960, 联合国大会通过[去殖民化宣言]中1514号决议是个人自决权和1541号决议是集体决定权要(一)独立;(二)联邦或(三)合并。

毛里求斯(Mauritius )在1965年将Chagos islands 割让给英国以换取独立。

其实,在1960年,[去殖民化宣言]后,英国政府功力就废了。可是他们却利用Mauritius 的无知,所以在他们的权威威胁下,毛里求斯就割让Chagos islands 给英国换取独立。

不过,从2010年开始,毛里求斯就开始去国际法庭求公道去了。经过9年打官司,联合国国际法庭总于在25/2/2019做个判决。主因是一个殖民地是没有权力签国际协议。

现在,查看世界地图Chagos islands 是否归于Mauritius 领土。

同理,砂沙当时1963年7月9日也是殖民地,那有资格在伦敦签署这份国际协议?

沙砂人民也被否决公投,联合国大会通过的[去殖民化宣言]中1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议集体决定权。所以,我认同研究MA63的法律专家,这份协议是无效的。

我希望砂砂反对党可以一起成立号称砂1541联盟。但愿S4S 的砂人都很1514支持这反对党联盟,让他们在砂议会完成砂独立程序。之后申请成为联合国第194会员国和成为第198独立国家之一。

Wednesday 20 September 2023

还要继续马联邦的关系吗?

难道我们不应该问这样一种没有成果、没有吸引力、不平等、不公正的关系是否值得继续下去?

(16-09-2023 Robert Pei)

 到目前为止,没有人列出沙巴砂拉越继续成为马来亚摇钱树的原因和好处。

 文莱政府没有签署 MA63 并保留了其财富,这是正确的做法。 马来人要求100%控制文莱的石油和天然气。 当时的苏丹表示,马来西亚不符合他人民的利益,他不希望文莱成为马来西亚的摇钱树。 他知道不仅党卫军需要“发展”,马来亚11个州属也需要“发展”。 他知道马来亚人在经济上没有能力履行他们的承诺,因为1959年马来亚政府不得不借债1亿美元来支付国家的行政费用。

 MA63的附录J支持了这一观点,即联邦和新加坡达成了一项“附带协议”,从新加坡借款1.5亿美元来发展沙巴和砂拉越。 由于新加坡于 1965 年明智地离开,这笔贷款从未发放。

 过去60年只是展现了新殖民关系,正如MA63所说,新殖民关系被描述为殖民办公室从伦敦转移到马来亚。

 因此,马来亚没有钱,尽管我们的“祖先”,精心挑选的英国提名人对马来西亚的“发展”印象深刻。

六十年后的今天,难道我们不应该问:这样一种没有成果、没有吸引力、不平等、不公正的关系是否值得继续下去?

Isn't it time we asked if such an unfruitful unappealling unequal and unjust relationship worthwhile to hang on? 

So far no one has listed the reasons and benefits for Sabah Sarawak to remain the cash cows of Malaya. 

The Brunei gov't did the right thing not to sign MA63 and kept it's wealth. The Malayans demanded 100% control of Brunei's oil and gas. The then Sultan said Malaysia was not in his people's interest and he did not want Brunei to be a cash cow for Malaysia. He knew that not only SS needed "development" but also the 11 Malayan states. He knew that the Malayans were incapable of financially fulfilling their promises because in 1959 the Malayan gov't had to borrow $100 million to pay for the administration costs of the country. 

Appendix J to MA63 supported this view whereby the Federation and S'pore had a "side agreement" to borrow $150 million from S'pore to develop Sabah and Sarawak. The loan was never given as S'pore smartly left in 1965. 

The last 60 years only demonstrate the neocolonial relationship which was described as the transfer of the colonial office from London to Malaya, as stated by MA63.  

So Malaya did not have the money although somehow our "forefathers" the handpicked British nominees were impressed by the "development" in Malaysia.

Saturday 16 September 2023

两政治烂苹果,砂人有得选吗?

两政治烂苹果,砂人有得选吗?。。赖耀松(看新闻说说看)

今天是916马联邦成立60年。今天也是砂拉越国殇日,失去国家地位,被马来亚殖民60年。

按照拿都督赖的说法,马来亚人似乎只能2选1:联合政府或国盟政府。

火箭队一直鼓吹选联合政府防止伊党化马联邦政治。

安华领导的昌明政府强调改革和反贪腐政治。开始了吗?

DNAA扎希,巫统主席和副首相,说是总检察长的决定先,后法庭的判决跟安华无关,谁相信?

也难怪慕尤丁会说希盟的reformasi 变成reformati 了。

昌明政府不昌明作法,以下有6点:
二。公立和私立大专举办演唱会严格遵守规定和限制。

三。部长张庆信在KLIA搭救中国旅客,揭发有官员索取18,000令吉。这案件到现在无下文。

四。教长不承认统考文凭。

五。安华强调保存大学土族固打制。

六。学校落实[圣训40段]教育。

七。安华表明明年1月举报土族经济大会强化土族议程。

砂人,现阶段寻求自治主权独立,这就是咱们砂人有第三选择机会。

砂领袖有必要扩大砂拉越现有的的法律权限,成立砂自家的“国会”。效仿苏格兰和英格兰有不同国会和立法权限。向苏格兰看齐,也拥有自家的货币。

马半岛已经变成贪污舞弊滥权腐败的温床,更被偏激种族宗教文化侵蚀。对,是一个失败的联邦。

砂必须尽快止损,停止马联邦不断掠夺,剥削,打压抢劫,霸凌和殖民砂。对,砂有必要在政治和经济自主独立。

我期待在15年内,砂可以脱马独立。

Friday 15 September 2023

行动党怎么了?

行动党怎么了?

火箭队在希盟内算是最大党,却无法发挥多数的优势。

民主游戏规则本来是少数数服从多数。可是,他们却倒反做:多数服从少数,显现出来的总是唯唯喏喏。

马华和民政当年是属于少数,所以总是被一党独大的巫统欺压。今天,火箭队是希盟中掌控最多议席的大党。处处显现的如此小胆小量。

被看扁成“静静党”,对当年大喊大叫坚持要捍卫的课题,现在正是正当时刻可以发挥,却噤如寒蝉,显得动弹不得。

是啊,回忆当时高分贝名嘴YB倪可敏在野时,总是以极高分贝的谈论地方选举和民主。上台后,说推动地方选举非首选事项。真的是选前选后两张脸。

坚持完成统考最后一哩路却如此难开口。

安华强调大学固打制保持不变时,高分贝名嘴YB倪,却相信沉默是金。火箭队集体都哑口无声。

当安华玩模棱两可说马来西亚既不是回教国也不是世俗国。玩是和不是,完全没有好好交代马联邦到底是什么?然而,火箭队完全没有感觉不对劲,没反应。整党都是静静的,以静应万声。

火箭队有40联邦议席,的确是名符其实的“造王者“,可以,轻易至安华于死地。

火箭可以在不加入任何联盟独当一面。可是,火箭队选择自我矮化,自甘堕落,犯贱。

所以,马华的魏公公回喂劝导他们[以过去检视---马华的标准---检视自己],这回击拳真的打得绝妙。

是的,火箭队是靠华人养分壮大的。没有华人坚持,不离不弃,风雨同行,就没有今天火箭队。

今天,火箭队上位了,却不办正当,正确,正直,正规,公正公平事。

以我看迟早会步入马华和民政后尘,被华人唾弃。

与其在这里那里心伤火箭队无能,不走正道,不如养大Muda 这第三势力。

要好好来个了解种种普遍不公正不公平社会现象。一切追根究底就是人民本身的问题总是卡在2选1的模型中,不能自拔。为什么不来个3选1呢?

Sunday 10 September 2023

诗巫燕窝商事件何时了

诗巫燕窝农商事件何时了

根据,燕农业者透露,自今年5月3日,森林局和警察人员突然对燕窝加工厂兼贸易商突袭没收了上吨的燕窝成品价值上两百多万。

经过和平交涉和部长安排对话,过了4个月,这事件还没有获得良善解决,怎么回事啊?

执法人员还会不时上门巡查逼使此加工厂无法好好运作。

这是花费巨资改建的场所,已停止操作,也辞退大部份本地的熟练员工,关门大吉。

诗巫省华团会长刘仁祥以个人名义发布文告。详述燕窝加工业的困境。

就每间合规格的燕窝加工厂必须符合国际食品加工进口国官方认证标准建造。花费从少则要几十万,多则要整百万。

燕窝业者往往要申请10多项执照,然而申请周期却要3-5年。

好不容易近20建立起产业,花费多少心血和耗费数千亿的经济行业,就被一次执行行动打垮在地。

诗巫燕窝行业从燕屋到燕窝加工产业链还处处在雏形阶段。但是它是中区民间经济重要部分提供很多人稳定收入。

现阶段,加工厂商以最大耐心等待有关部门厘清有关条列,管理规定和税收条令。

许多燕农还在苦苦等待已申请的执照。

对于被充公的燕窝现在是否开始泛黄或腐烂。有关当局的作法,真的另人不可思议。

说诗巫燕窝加工厂不合法,是啊,为何迄今还没把他们控上法庭以让法律做个判决?

诗巫燕窝加工厂商愿意配合相关部门运作规定。他们只希望,加工厂早日恢复运作,对厂家和员工都有好处。

现阶段燕农只好把毛燕窝被压价10%以上卖到外省加工厂。

其实,燕窝就是会生金鸡蛋的母鸡会给民间制造源源不绝的财富,可是被无良无理的有关当局一搞,就瘫痪在地。

政府是时候检讨过时的法令。官方高层必须尽快挽救中区燕窝业和颓废经济。