Pages

Powered By Blogger

Monday 30 October 2023

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya 'sick' policies

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya’s ‘sick’ policies

Francis Paul Siah
28 October, 2023
Malaysiakini

COMMENT I wouldn’t dare claim that I speak for Sarawak.

However, as a Sarawakian, I wish to say that I speak for myself, at the very least, and I’m sure, many Sarawakians too on these current issues which I would describe as “sick” instructions and policies from Putrajaya.

How do I know that there is a large cross-section of my fellow Sarawakians who are in agreement with my views at times? They responded in the affirmative to my posts.

Here’s an example. In my previous article on the Middle East conflict, where I urged the Madani government not to take sides but to consider humanitarian aid for all the innocent victims of war, more than 90 percent of those on my contact list, the majority of whom are Sarawakians of various beliefs, stated their agreement.

I’m also happy to mention that a Malay minister from Sarawak also agreed with my neutral stand and for Malaysia to be a peacemaker and help find solutions to the conflict.

I do not have the minister’s permission to mention names, so it would be unethical for me to reveal the person’s identity.

Seriously, why should anyone be surprised that Malays/Muslims in Sarawak are different from those in Malaya? I have written on this matter before and allow me to recap.

In October 2019, I wrote that Sarawak Malays are already a dignified race and they do not need a Malay Dignity Congress like certain Malay groups in Malaya.

To the academicians from the four universities who initiated the event on Oct 6 four years ago, it might be worth your while to learn from your fellow Malays in Sarawak.

I wrote then: “Simple folks they might be from Borneo, but they are already a dignified race. Sarawak Malays must have been riding on the right track of race relations all along.

“Surely, something must be wrong somewhere if a section of Malays in Malaya feel that they have no dignity left or that their dignity has been threatened”, I added.

On another occasion, I wrote that “Sarawak Malays have no interest in ‘Malay Proclamation’, a declaration initiated by Dr Mahathir Mohamad in May this year.

To the Malays in Sarawak, it is not way off to state that Mahathir’s Malay Proclamation is a useless, worthless document which means nothing to them.

Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg was also quick to dismiss the event, saying “I have no knowledge of the ‘Malay Proclamation’.

“How would I know? We are still busy celebrating Hari Raya in Sarawak, and then the incoming Gawai celebration. Why should I be bothered about issues there (Peninsular Malaysia)?” Abang Johari was reported as saying.

I’m rewinding these two events for a reason and that is to remind Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim not to try too hard to be seen as the Malay hero at home and abroad.

There are also Malays/Muslims in Sarawak, and in Sabah too, who have a different perspective about race/religion matters.

Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) may be partners in Anwar’s Madani government, but the prime minister must never think that he could lead Sarawakians and Sabahans by the nose.

No, sir. I believe the people in the two Borneo territories are aware that they have been taken for a ride for too long and I want Anwar to know that many in Sabah and Sarawak (and I am certainly one of them) resent some Malayan politicians in power for this reason.

So, Anwar and all future prime ministers, don’t push your luck too far with Sarawakians and Sabahans.

We know what we want and for many of us, the next best thing to do is to secede - yes, secession, you heard it right. (I know that’s a “bad word” for many who intend to continue milking the rich resources from Sabah and Sarawak.)

When Putrajaya started introducing “sick” policies like now, how do you expect us, in Sabah and Sarawak, to feel?

When you want to force our schools and students to organise the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools from Oct 29 to Nov 3, that must surely be the worst thing to happen in the history of Sarawak education.

Although it has now been clarified that the event is not mandatory in Sarawak, it is bad enough to involve our schools and students in an emotive issue associated with spite, hatred and anger.

And we have to hear the most “Stupid” (stupid with a capital ‘S’) argument from the Education Ministry that the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools will teach students about humanitarian values and to practise empathy.

To the education minister and her staff, there is a word for stupidity in Sarawak. It is called “paloi”. I see no point in arguing with “paloi” ministers and some of their brainless department heads.

However, I honestly doubt that Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek would even dare to plan the controversial Palestine Solidarity Week without instruction from her boss, the prime minister.

I would like to know whether this matter was brought up for discussion in the cabinet before a decision was made.

If so, what was the input from the other ministers? Was the objection to the event, if any, noted?

Make public the names of ministers who had opposed staging the Palestine Solidarity Week. Don’t pretend there was a general consensus to hold the event. I cannot believe that.

What about the other recent “sick” policy from Putrajaya that all government departments should not entertain any letters written in a language other than the national language Bahasa Malaysia?

I’m glad this was quickly brushed off by Sarawak state secretary Mohd Abu Bakar Marzuki that the ruling does not apply to Sarawak.

Not only that, he also said that federal departments have to accept correspondences from Sarawak written in English as well.

The state secretary made it clear that Sarawak civil service can continue to use English in official communications.

Again, why a need for such a directive from Putrajaya, which is not applicable nationwide?

Eleven months in, Anwar has fumbled again and again but each time, I could forgive him.

This time is different. I believe Anwar is trying his utmost to gain international recognition as a Muslim leader, losing sight in the process that he is prime minister of a multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural secular Malaysia.

Just be wary, Mr Prime Minister, when you try to push too hard on race, religion and language issues upon Malaysians, there are the Borneo territories where our beliefs, cultures and priorities are different from Malaya.

The day we cannot take it anymore, I believe we should seriously work out a solution to our fundamental differences. Perhaps, the best way is to exit.

FRANCIS PAUL SIAH is a veteran Sarawak editor and heads the Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS). He can be reached at sirsiah@gmail.com.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Monday 23 October 2023

我怎么认为:邓伦奇--联邦“造王者。。”

我怎么认为:
邓伦奇:联邦“造王者” z砂应提升为“自治”
 
没错,在这时空下,砂政盟现在拥有26个联邦议席稳住联邦联合政府,我认为可以乘机全速在MA63协议规定下的特殊地位要求更高的自治权:列如
一.   立法权
二.砂天然资源 (100%属于砂民的)
三.联邦议席222(我认为马:沙:砂74:74:74否则退出马联邦)
四.宗教自由(永远不变)
五.移民自主 (全权掌握)
六.官方语言 (砂人自决)
七.砂领海领土是12 海里(完璧归赵)
所有属于砂拉越的权益,设时限一一归还,不然,向联合国求公道去。
 
对了,在砂立法议会可制定公投法令维护砂本土自主,“规定关系砂自主自治课题上,赋予砂全民投票权”。
 
嗯,对,在1960年代,砂人被剥夺联合国大会通过的【去殖民化宣言】中1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体人民的抉择。是的,60年前,人联党反殖民争取独立运动,为砂自主自治所做的牺牲和贡献。
 
我完全认同,邓的看法砂立法议会制定公投法的目的就是强大民意力量。是的,公投必须有民意基础,然后,才跟联邦商讨砂独立课题。
 
潘永强博士认为独立课题有触及法律,所有具争议性。我认为潘博士很欠缺MA63,跨政法委员会报考/IGC知识和认知,所有不知道潘是否知道MA63的合法性更更具争议性。我不知道潘博士,政治学者,对Chagos island-Mauritus的案件认知有多少。
 
MA63是国际契约,我相信,有一天,有必要的话,砂倡导砂独立的领袖会向联合国国际法院求审讯要公道去。
 
潘博士认为砂要公投“需要国家同意与允许,如苏格兰要独立公投。。。”必须获得英国的允许。
 
Well,砂跟马联邦的关系有别于英国跟苏格兰的关系:
一.马半岛和砂拉越在千多海里之遥远的距离而英国和苏格兰是在同一块
        土地上。
二.马来亚和砂拉越签的协议充满着争议性而英国和苏格兰签的双方协
         议。
三.砂有固有的权力退出马联邦。砂可以在砂议会完成砂独立程序而苏格兰必须向英国申请独立公投。
 
我认同邓的看法,砂政治领导有必要打造砂民族和开创本土模式以经济和就业生活共同体融合各族。对,对,对,对付种族/宗教主义“最佳的武器”莫过于人民有生活共同点和目标融合在一起。
 
始终,我都认为每个砂民必须肩负这使命一起传播砂拉越民族,大家团结一致以1541号决议集体抉择砂的未来走向。

重拳出击

重拳出击
砂联邦选区重新划分 –选民人数需大致相等
我就针对这组织这标题来说说我的看法。 该文章没声明谁是发言人?
这组织说“选区的重新划分,若不遵守宪法规章的活,那更大的分配不当问题将会出现。。。”它认为砂城乡选区联邦席位选民人数上有很大的落差。这我认同。

它就指出在第15届联邦选举:美里联邦选区有14万3229人数而伊干联邦选区却只有2万8290人。所以当中代表差异是1:5,这表示伊干选区一张选票强度是美里区的5倍。它说在第15届联邦选区,砂的选举商数是6万2680名选民。这商数是砂选民总数÷31砂联邦议席。以该组织的计算,美里联邦议席人数比该选举商数高出128%,然而伊干选民人数比选举商数少了55%。

它说除了乡区以外,砂拉越境内联邦选区的选民人数大致上相等。
它说“根据1人1票的原则,拥有6分1选民的沙砂,已拥有25%的超额代表”。 这种算法必须是在同一块土地上的国家,相等经济发展的前提下是对的。

马来西亚是三国联邦在不同块的土地上,很不相等的经济发展。马来西亚就是马来亚的化名,”一切都以马来亚为尊” 。联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚。议席分配74.78%在马来亚。

如果按照该组织的 “1人1票的原则”,那么沙砂永远是被边缘化。联邦剥夺沙砂资源后,以人数来分配联邦拨款,那么沙砂别想能有跟马半岛相等的经济发展。这“1人1票的原则”,有民主原则吗?

所以该组织的提议是非常不合逻辑的。再说沙砂不是马来亚的一个州属,凭什么是以同一国州的算法。沙砂被强硬的加入马联邦已经是被马霸权绑手绑脚无法充分发挥。MA63协议是不平等协议。砂人照理是要有“一切以砂拉越为尊”。砂怎么会有这样款式的组织“一切以马来亚为尊”像行动党的思维模式呢?

我认为砂崛起这组织的“1人1票的原则”崛起对砂非常不利。我质疑这组织是否外来党的卧底。

一个愚蠢的人

一个头脑愚蠢的人
2024年联邦财政预算案:总理对砂拉越5.8亿令吉的拨款感到满意
(《婆罗洲邮报》2023 年 10 月 16 日星期一)

阿邦佐哈里没有对这种不公平和不公正的分配表示愤怒和沮丧,而是对2024年马联邦预算案中给砂拉越的58亿(6.4%)对着马来亚的876亿(86.3%)拨款则表示满意。

他没有利用造王者的地位向联邦政府施压要求300亿令吉拨款,而是对58亿令吉感到满意和感激。当砂拉越在基础设施和经济发展方面远远落后于马来亚时,他表达他的满意和感激之情是愚蠢和多么阿Q。

     “我要感谢马来西亚昌明政府给予砂拉越的相当大拨款。是的,我
     很满意……当然我想要更多,但也必须记住,这是有其 限制”

联邦政府(马来亚伪装的)从砂拉越掠夺了2000至3000亿令吉的石油天然气收入和其他税收,并只拨款58亿令吉(2024年预算)。我想知道有多少砂拉越人不为这分配感到愤怒和沮丧。

尽管总理阿邦佐是造王者,但他从未要求公平分享联邦发展基金。他他的思考,言行举止都像个傻瓜,怎能不被当傻瓜一样被对待呢?

我希望志同道合的砂拉越人能够团结起来,共同创造一个更美好、更光明的砂拉越。我们需要敢于为砂拉越要求适当份额的领导人,以及主张永远分裂的领导人,因为砂拉越在马来西亚联邦内是不可能有希望获得良好发展。

An idiotic-minded person 

Budget 2024: Premier satisfied with Sarawak’s RM5.8b allocation
(Borneo Post 16/10/2023 Monday)

Instead of expressing his rage and frustration for such unfair and unjust allocation, Premier AbangJohari expressed his satisfaction with 5.8 billion (6.4%) allocation for development to Sarawak as against 87.6 billion (86.3%) allocation to Malaya under the Budget 2024.  

Instead of using the position of a King-maker to pressurise the federal government to allocate RM30 billion, he is satisfied and his grateful with RM5.8 billion. It is idiotic and a Q of him to express his satisfaction and gratitude when Sarawak lags so far behind Malaya in terms of infrastructure and economic development.

     “I want to thank the Madani government of Malaysia for giving 
      quite a big allocation to Sarawak. Yes, I am satisfied … of course 
      I want some more but must also remember that there are 
      limitations”

From Sarawak, the federal government (Malaya in disguise) plundered RM200 – 300 billion in oil-gas revenue and other taxes and allocated RM5.8 billion (Budget 2024). I wonder how many Sarawakians do not feel exaperated and frustrated for the allocation. 

Premier AbangJo, has never demanded for an equitable share of the federal development fund despite being the king-maker. He thinks like a fool, acts like a fool and behaves like a fool and of course he is treated like one.

I hope that the like-minded Sarawakians for change can rally with one another for a better and brighter Sarawak. We need the leaders who dare to demand for the proper share for Sarawak and the ones who advocate secession for good as there is no hope in the federation of Malaysia for the proper development of Sarawak.

Friday 13 October 2023

以色列挑战全球底线

挑战全球底线,以色列种族清洗和屠杀平民  

时间:13-10-2023
来源:西陆网 李雨

种族清洗和屠杀平民这种事情,美国和它的盟友们干过不少。
但从二战之后,所有的国家,即使要干,也是偷摸着干的,因为都知道,这事情,是极端不道德的,是反人类的,是挑战了人类文明的底线。

1968年,美军在越南美莱村发动大屠杀,杀害了504名手无寸铁的妇女和儿童,之后这个事情的策划人威廉凯利中尉被美国的军事法庭裁决有罪,判处终身监禁,虽然几年后就被释放了。

2001年,美国和它的盟友们发动阿富汗战争,2016年开始,维基解密先后发布多段视频,拿出了美军屠杀手无寸铁的阿富汗平民的铁证。
美国对此勃然大怒,对罪证百般推诿,最后设下重重陷阱,逮捕了维基解密的创始人阿桑奇。

当年美国攻打南联盟,疯狂的轰炸贝尔格莱德,首先要做的就是断网断电,让全球无法知道屠杀的真相。

这事情“可以做“,但绝对不可以说。
我在这里举这些例子,意思是美国再怎么混蛋,怎么反人类,也知道屠杀平民这个事情,是极端丢脸、可耻、触犯人类文明底线的邪恶的、不可容忍的行为。
可以说,只要是个正儿八经的国家,这就是基本的、普遍的共识。
但是,只有一个国家例外。
就是以色列。

以色列,是一个极端崇尚暴力的国家,在他们看来,屠杀平民,不仅不是羞耻的事情,反而是一种荣耀。

以色列是二战之后恐怖主义的创始国,美国等盟友们所屠戮的平民加起来都不到以色列的零头。

这个国家,可以说是生于不义,因为起源就是犹太复国主义者,他们以恐怖袭击起家,比较有代表性的两件,一个是1946年7月22日,在耶路撒冷的大卫王饭店制造爆炸事件,造成92人死亡,58人受伤,所有的受害者都是平民。

另一件就是1948年4月10日,大约200名犹太复国主义者袭击了耶路撒冷郊外的代尔亚辛村,杀死了250多人,大部分是妇女和儿童。

在这之后,制造这两起恐怖袭击的凶手,不仅没有受到任何惩罚,而且在犹太人中成为了民族英雄,被万民膜拜!
这就是不以为耻,反以为荣的典型!

从此之后,犹太人在恐怖袭击的路上一路狂飙,疯狂的屠戮平民。
1982年,以色列策划了震惊全球的贝鲁特惨案,遇难平民超过了1700人到3000人,现场惨不忍睹,无数人的头皮被剥了下来,许多男孩被阉割,许多妇女被强暴.......

随后,联合国代表大会将这一事件定性为种族清洗,要惩罚凶手,我们要说的是,虽然美西方集团偏袒以色列,但针对这一事实,没有任何一个国家敢投反对票!
联合国认定以色列的国防部长沙龙需要对贝鲁特惨案负责,对沙龙进行了严厉谴责。

对此沙龙感到莫名其妙,沙龙说你们凭什么谴责我,屠杀平民难道错了吗?我哪里做得不对?

以色列的总理贝京认为沙龙没有任何过错,对沙龙进行了全力袒护,而整个以色列更是将沙龙作为了他们至高无上的英雄人物。

最后,因为强大的国际舆论压力,沙龙不得不愤而辞职,但因为他屠戮平民的“伟业”,在以色列成为了家喻户晓的英雄,随后被全民推选为以色列总理!

看到这一幕我们还有什么可说的?

我说句不好听的,纳粹德国掌握了武力之后,屠戮了600万犹太人。

但是如果掌握武力的是以色列,屠戮的平民后面估计还要加个零!

况且,德国还知道真诚忏悔,但以色列只会认为这是一种荣耀!

所以你看了以色列他们的行为,就知道了他们今天所做的一切。

现在,以色列开始了对加沙的无差别轰炸,以色列国防部长加兰特公开宣称:
我们已经取消了所有战争规则。我们的士兵不会对任何事情负责,也不会有军事法庭。

你知道这是啥意思吗?

以色列的这个话,出现在人类300年以前的历史中,就是在攻城前告诉士兵,只要打下了城市,就可以三天不封刀,你们可以随便杀人,随便抢劫,随便强奸.......
自从人类有了文明这个词,这种行为已经为所有人唾弃!

可是以色列公然鼓励士兵屠城,在全世界面前开历史的倒车!

我们说了,美国屠杀平民,是偷摸着干的。

但是以色列屠杀平民,是公开干的。

他们不仅公开干,而且生怕别人不知道。
不仅怕别人不知道,还要大肆宣扬,让全球都知道他们屠戮平民的“丰功伟绩”!

于是,我们看到了,加沙的一栋栋房屋成为废墟;
我们看到那个男人呆滞的坐在废墟上,旁边是他儿子的玩具熊;
我们看到那个父亲抱着儿子的尸体,在医院里最后的拥抱;
我们看到巴勒斯坦人在废墟中扒出女儿的尸体,充满怒火的咆哮着说要复仇;
........

而以色列笑呵呵的问全世界:你们看我牛逼不牛逼,你们看我干得漂亮吗?
羞耻?

根本就没有好不好,以色列只会感受到无上的荣光。

国防部长加兰特得意的说:我们正在对加沙进行全面封锁。没有电,没有食物,没有水,没有燃气,完全切断!

以色列空军参谋长蒂什勒嚣张的说:我们正在用前所未有的规模攻击加沙,现在没有精准一说,谈论的是数以千计的弹药!

在那一刻,他们都认为自己是英雄。

一年前,乌克兰布查惨案发生后,美国说是俄罗斯干的,俄罗斯愤怒的否认,说要发起调查组进行彻查,必须要查明真相。
现在好了,面对比布查惨烈百倍的屠杀平民事件,以色列却兴奋的举着手告诉全世界:对,这就是我干的!

今天的以色列,挑战的已经不是巴勒斯坦了,也不是在挑战阿拉伯世界,他们是在挑战全人类了。

由于以色列毫无差别的屠戮,仅仅这两天,先后有11名联合国工作人员在以色列的空袭中遇难,联合国的20所由学校改建的避难所也在爆炸中遭到破坏。

以色列根本无所谓,依然是一副你们看我牛逼不牛逼的样子。

联合国终于怒了,说你要打我的脸,打了就打了,还一定要公开的打,打了还要全世界去说,生怕有人不知道。
你这是一点活路都不想给我啊!你这非要是把人往死里逼啊!

联合国人道主义事务协调厅说,自巴以冲突升级以来,加沙地带已有近26.4万人流离失所。
仅仅在过去24小时,仍有大批生活在加沙地带的民众被迫离开家园,总人数已超过263934人。预计该数字还会进一步上升。

联合国已启用位于加沙地带的紧急避难所,为流离失所者提供必要帮助,约17.5万人在联合国近东巴勒斯坦难民救济和工程处的数十所学校里避难。

但现在联合国估计要哭了,他们连避难所都炸!

接着,联合国宣布将对最近巴以冲突升级期间可能犯下的战争罪进行调查,并对违法者追究法律责任。

但是以色列呢?根本不在乎!
因为昨天的数据是以色列炸死了联合国9个人,今天的数据增加到了11个人!

以色列这么干,欧盟也终于怕了!
以往在任何场合他们都要强调一点:秉承我们共同的价值观。
哪怕明知道是假的,这句话也要拿出来说。
现在可好,以色列当着全世界的话,把这句话拿去擦屁股!还要全球直播!
原来是皇帝的新衣,大家一起好歹要演戏。
现在呢?皇帝直接告诉你,老子摊牌了,老子就是在裸奔,你看我的大不大?
以色列说,什么共同的价值观,那就是一泡屎!
估计冯德莱恩要愤怒的咆哮了:
合着你连个逼都不让我装了??

现在,全世界都震惊了,在原来,最反人类的是日本,但日本也不敢说屠杀是对的,日本就是拼命抵赖说他没干过。

现在以色列却是公开搞,明目张胆的搞,还要全球同步直播........
搞完生怕你不知道,怼着你问:看我牛逼不?

但是,形势正在悄然的发生变化!
在以色列的一系列暴行后,欧盟刚举行了外长紧急会议,随后欧盟的外交与安全政策高级代表博雷利说:
几乎所有欧盟外长都支持继续与巴勒斯坦民族权力机构合作,并继续向其提供财政援助。
此时此刻,加沙的伤亡人数正在增加,人道主义形势十分严峻。我们必须支持更多,而不是更少!

在这次巴以冲突发生后,欧盟很快宣布,立刻暂停支付给巴勒斯坦人的6.91亿欧元援助;
但在以色列轰炸加沙后,欧盟即刻转向,宣布不会停止支付援助。

因为我们一定要清楚,在欧洲等国家看来,哈马斯,仅仅是巴勒斯坦的一个组织,并不能代表巴勒斯坦。
而以色列,好歹是国际上承认的一个国家,它居然公然实施反人类罪行,这让所有人都受不了了。

全球对以色列厌恶的情绪,正在不断积累。

而另一边,就在刚刚,阿拉伯国家集体发声不久,伊朗总统与沙特王储兼首相通了一个电话,讨论巴勒斯坦与以色列之间最新一轮冲突局势,主题是“结束针对巴勒斯坦的战争罪行的必要性”。

要注意,这是他们在恢复外交关系后的首次通话。
沙特媒体说,沙特王储申明:我们正在尽一切努力与国际和地区各方保持沟通,以阻止局势的持续升级,我们拒绝以任何方式将平民作为袭击目标。

也就是在这两天,阿拉伯国家苏丹,在与伊朗中断外交关系7年之后,宣布外交关系恢复。

在以色列的不断刺激下,中东的各个国家,一定会再次统一共识,这仅仅是时间的问题。

通过以上我们能看出什么?

以色列这一次对加沙的全面封锁,意图非常清晰,如果进攻沙加打巷战,他们是打不下来的,光沙加城市地下密密麻麻的地道就够让他们遭受惨重的损失。

那么以色列要做的,就是切断一切国际援助,不断的制造人道主义灾难,让加沙的近300万人成为难民,最终被迫离开这座城市,这样哈马斯就失去了生存的基础,然后以色列再来夺取加沙。

至于近300万难民呢?他们爱去哪里去哪里,反正以色列不会管他们的死活。

所以在短短的一天事件,以色列对加沙的超过2500个目标实施了无差别轰炸,整个城市到处是残垣断壁,到处是尸体、惨叫与哀嚎........

加沙,作为一座已经被以色列封锁了近20年的城市,这一次将遭受全面围城+断水断粮+无差别轰炸.......

以色列认为这样做就能彻底剿灭哈马斯。
他们的目标能达成吗?

现在美国发布的最新消息,美国将派出第二艘航母抵达中东支持以色列。

同时,美国还紧急向以色列援助了45亿美元,甚至不惜把给乌克兰的军援挪到了以色列。

哈马斯,仅仅是一个地方武装,战斗力对比以色列那是天差地远。
美国为什么派了一艘航母还不够,还要再派一艘航母?

泽连斯基都公开喊话美国了,说你们这样搞,乌克兰将承受极大压力,时间在俄罗斯那边。

以色列,原来号称自己就可以推平整个中东,现在搞一个哈马斯,就需要美国全力援助?甚至不惜抛弃乌克兰?

因为美国真的怕了,以色列这么干真的是太要命了,这简直就是要逼着中东国家联合起来啊。

所以美国一面紧急援助以色列,一面对媒体喊话警告伊朗不要轻举妄动。
同时纽约时报说,10月10日拜登和内塔尼亚胡通了个电话,强调以色列军方需要尽力避免平民伤亡,否则白宫将不得不面对舆论的反弹。

拜登说你这样干是要坑死我吗?我们民主党的基本盘好歹是白左啊!你让我怎么和他们交代?

但是以色列能收手吗?
收不了手了,我上次说了,自从拉宾被刺杀以后,以色列越来越极端,越来越反人类,这一次居然损失了900人,他怎么可能咽得下这口气。

原来都是他屠戮别人的啊,作为中东小霸王,从来都是他欺负别人,什么时候被人欺负过?

所以内塔利亚胡认为这对他来说是一个集权的好机会,要往死里干。
而以色列的军方放出了狠话,更跟没打算给加沙的平民留活路.......

最后我说下结论吧,以色列这样赤裸裸的、公开的、无耻的挑战全球人类的底线,这样的国家就要凉了!

在今天这个世界上,全球不可能眼睁睁的看着一个国家公然的持续的制造反人类的罪行。

以色列再这么干下去,最后只能是天怒人怨,促使整个阿拉伯世界团结起来,最终越来越多的组织下场。

而无论是联合国,还是美国的盟友们,都将会开始倒戈!

至少,在舆论上再不会有人敢支持它,它首先在政治上会输掉所有的资本。
因为这是人类文明社会最基本的底线!
以色列终将众叛亲离。

前两天,经常有人问,为什么巴勒斯坦人,他们明知道有去无回,明知道不可能活下来,他们为什么还是要搭乘滑翔伞飞向以色列的军营?

你去看看那些加沙失去家园和孩子们的人,答案不就很清楚了吗?
加沙,是不会屈服的!
(责编:李雨)

Friday 6 October 2023

Wong Pak Ming: Independence is the best option for Sarawak

Wong Pak Ming said:Independence is the best option for Sarawak
黄拔明先生说:独立是砂拉越最好的选择
https://sg.docworkspace.com/d/sIGqsiMu_AZGTgKkG?sa=03&st=0

 坚信独立是砂拉越能够进步的最好的选择。我有许多令人信服的理由,最重要的是发展。 

马来西亚联邦成立 60 年后,尽管砂拉越贡献了这些年来该国的大部分收入来自出口,来自砂拉越的石油和天然气。 然而,与马来亚半岛相比,今天,砂拉越就像一个乡村小镇,道路、设施和设施,和工作机会都有限。但就石油和天然气出口收入而言,对于我们这所谓最富有的邦国来说这是羞耻的。

在这本书中我为砂拉越的发展提出策略和计划,以令人信服的理由说明独立不仅是可以实现的,而且砂拉越将如何变得更加繁荣。

( I firmly believe that independence is the best option for Sarawak’s 
progress and there are many compelling reasons, foremost being development. After 60 years of federation within Malaysia there 
is still so little development in Sarawak despite it contributing the 
bulk of the country’s revenue all these years through the export of oil and gas from Sarawak. When compared to peninsula Malaya 
today, Sarawak is like a rural town with limited roads, amenities and 
job opportunities which is shameful for supposedly the richest state.
in terms of revenues earned from oil and gas export. In this book, I have put forward strategies and plans for Sarawak’s development and 
compelling reasons why independence is not only achievable but also how Sarawak would be more prosperous as a result.)

大雾散去。。沈振仁

我看,我听,我思 –读后感
大雾散去,梦醒时分,继续装睡或是面对? 沈振仁

马联邦今天政治局面验证政治真的是什么都有可能的艺术。对呀! 在政治利益考量下,仇家都可以拥抱在一起。马联邦联合政府就是最佳的写照。

马来西亚就是马来亚跟砂国有千海里之遥远,之间肯定没有唇亡齿寒之关系。砂没马联邦肯定明天会更好。可是,马来亚没有砂日子怎么过。

砂政盟自2018年脱离巫统国阵魔掌后成为独立政体成为“造王者”。马来亚今天的乱局是天意和人祸,是巫统国阵从不信正轨正道办理正确的公事。

嗯,人联党在4/6/1959,创党以来初期是以反殖民争取独立为主轴。在70年代加入砂国阵后,就开始大逆转,弄得自己里外不像人,被人民唾弃。

说到砂S4S的崛起来由是在2011年因Najib上任当首相后,担任联合国某职位必须废除内安法令。 砂S4S就大事宣传砂历史和大公开了MA63。

已故Adenan Satem, 在2014年正式上位后,非常支持S4S。之后,砂政盟斗争的大方向,争取砂的自主权变成人联党的救命符。

在1978年,马火箭进驻砂。经过18年经营,在1996年,就有三支火箭射入砂议会。人联党,相对论,走向堕落,给人印象就是为Taib 做帐。

从1996年起经历大起大落。在2021年竞选26席位只险胜2 议席。

对呀,试问砂行动党在砂45年,对砂有何贡献?是有扮演好反对党角色,但对向联邦争取权益,没有一点丁作为。反而,有倒米记录。

停留在空气中承诺不断回响循环,希盟1.0和今天希盟2.0,落实令人厌恶的事项。

人联党创党初期,有着左翼思想,逐渐的越走越右,到左右难分,又一次向右定位。党也有命运共同体,行动党也有人联党的过程,但是,。。。

砂政府争取自主权是势在必行。现今砂政盟也开始努力提升内陆基建措施。砂政府在AbangJo带领下逐渐走上正轨,多项领域也获得多方瞩目。

行动党未来最大的敌人是砂本土反对联盟,目前,是肯雅兰党领先。

谈周的分裂牌和区域牌

谈周长佑的分裂牌和区域牌

周长佑严厉谴责人联“上瘾式”分裂国人各族。(诗华日报4/10/23)

我以一个砂人的立场看周的论点,我真的觉得周长佑很幼稚和神经过敏。

这分明是M4M对冲S4S:马来亚人的马来亚对着干砂拉越人的砂拉越。

人联强调S4S,是天经地义的事。砂人本来就是要以砂国为中心。

马来亚以马来西亚国名义还不是以马来亚区域为中心。庆祝831是最佳的写照。

马联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚区域。周和其他砂火箭队连吭一声都没有。安华首相2023年,联邦拨款砂拉越只有5.6%。这分明就是殖民者的霸权作为。

今天,人联砂政盟的成员坚持争取更公平权益。以砂拉越优先,砂财富属于砂人共有的,有错吗?

马来亚以马来西亚国的名义不间断的掠夺,剥削打压,抢劫霸凌和殖民砂拉越。周怎么如此无感。

砂人联-G P S团队强调砂身份和特点,有错吗?哪里搞分裂?

马来亚的计划是马来亚化洗脑,意图抹掉砂民砂身份和特点。就是去婆罗洲化以马来亚化砂拉越。这周怎么不认为马来亚搞区域牌呢?

周不只幼稚,还中M4M毒太深,所以受不了S4S的人联。

马来亚就是以马来西亚国的身份压缩砂拉越。周却跟马来亚翩翩起舞。

众所周知,周的政治仕途是建立在M4M的基础上,然而S4S却严重摇动其地基。

人联-GPS终极目标是自治权,哪里有空间搞分裂?

砂本土反对党,以肯雅兰党领先,真的是脱马独立为主轴。砂人是以1514号决议决定砂未来。最后,送上SLM的铭言绝句:脱马无罪;独立有理赠送给砂人。

Thursday 5 October 2023

两位主讲者不赞同砂独立

主张 在 大马框架 争取自主权                                          

两主讲者 不赞同砂独立 (诗华日报 2/10/23)

诗巫华团,主办这场演讲主题为【绿潮 冲击下 马来西亚的 政治格局 及 演变】。主讲者是政治领袖邓伦奇和政治学者潘永强。美中不足是没邀请倡导砂独立知名人士好像肯雅兰党的主席温利山,秘书长刘秘秀,或SLM主导Thomas Kiew 或准候选人Josephine Lau. 这样,邓和潘就可以眼界大开知道砂独立后的种种好处。

两位主讲者赞不赞同砂独立根本不重要,因为砂独立不独立是大部分砂人说了算。马来亚人根本没有资格在砂比手画脚,说三道四。

邓,人联元老,谈独立不独立犹豫不决,吞吞吐吐,不能立马下判断。

潘,马来亚人,外人,不赞同砂独立,立场搞笑。讲一大堆废话,如果独立,那么不好,那么,马来亚为什么向英国争取独立呢? 在知识和认知都不足,没有做足功课下谈砂独立的【弊】,很损自己。

其实,联合国是鼓励有资格独立的国家争取独立。在14/12/1960年,联合国大会通过【去殖民化宣言】中的1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体决定权下耀:一。独立;二。联邦;或 三。合并

争取更大的自治权是人联和砂政盟要在马联邦内的终极目标。本土的反对党,我相信有一天会成立【砂本土反对党联盟】争取的是脱马独立,向新加坡看齐。砂拉越跟马半岛相距千多海里,本来就不是违反自然结合。

说“现有马联邦已经60年,基础也打好。。”,我知道的是马来亚就是以马来西亚联邦的名义,违宪的不间断的掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫,霸凌和殖民砂拉越的基础。

邓说真正独立很辛苦。那么被马来亚殖民,难道不辛苦吗?

说“砂地处 南中国海关键战略地带,列强虎视耽耽,猜不透邻国的想法”。砂独立,如果会有列强的威胁和邻国的入侵,那么联合国,还有存在的价值吗? 新加坡和文莱,为什么还稳稳当当的生存着?

潘说独立是很贵的,要买飞机,火箭,大炮,要设国防力量等等。Well,砂不独立更贵。每年被马半岛剥夺2,3千亿的税金来开拓砂拉越是绰绰有余的。关于管理国家,处理种族和宗教问题,不必潘担心和操心。咱们肯定不会像马来亚陷入种族和宗教的泥泽中。
说新加坡李光耀含泪离开马联邦,那是一般人的看法。其实,李在他回忆录中有清楚的交代脱马过程。经过密室谈判后,东姑有在两份协议书上签名:分离协议书和独立宣言书。

可惜,潘没机会听听本土在野党和人民论述砂独立后的种种好处。

Tuesday 3 October 2023

PBK should contest N67 Jepak by-election

*PBK - PARTI BUMI KENYALANG SHOULD CONTEST THE N67 JEPAK BY-ELECTION IN BINTULU.* 

The politics of Malaya and Sarawak from the time the Federation of Malaysia has not brought any significant progress and developments to Sarawak, especially to the vast rural areas. The citizens are still living in poverty and lack the basic infrastructure and amenities. This has been a period of 60 years. Are the people of Sarawak going to remain the same for 100 years?

For as long as we are governed by the present ruling regime in cahoot with Malaya, Sarawak and its people will never see any better developments. One political scientist has emphasised that Sarawak is 100 years behind in developments compared to Malaya. This shows the terrible lack of fiduciary duty to Sarawak. So why should Sarawak remain in the Federation of Malaysia? In the future to come Sarawak will be an independent nation, so why should we wait. Now is the time. Sarawak people are more than capable of governing the country much better. We could have much better roads all over Sarawak by now. But look at the conditions of roads in rural Sarawak. Sarawak people should not be too naive about the conditions of developments in Sarawak. The Pan-Borneo Highway should be Four-Lanes on either side to call it a highway. 

Sarawak should demand self-determination. We have enough of the hegemony of Malaya and GPS Sarawak. The struggle, as charted by PBK for Sarawak to be independent, is the only choice for Sarawak to become a great nation and country.

For the by-election for Jepak, PBK should contest the election. The struggle for Sarawak independence should be prompted wherever possible and in whatever opportunity. The people of Sarawak must and should start to advocate for Sarawak Independence. PBK is the one and only political party that advocates and fights for Sarawak Independence. 

The people of Sarawak must now wake up to see the future of Sarawak as an independent nation. Sarawak should have been a much more developed country if we had been independent. Look at how Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, which is now a developed nation. 

Being in the Federation of Malaysia has actually made Sarawak to be a colony of Malaya. 

The people of Sarawak must support PBK so that Sarawak can go for self-determination and independent state.

Prof Dr. Richard Ibuh
Vice President
Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Was Malaysia formed by way of fraud?

*WAS MALAYSIA FORMED BY WAY OF FRAUD?*

In rural areas, not many have yet ever heard about MA63 and even in towns and cities in Sabah and Sarawak, many people never heard about MA63.

Legal opinions in UN Secretariat 
clearly mentioned that Malaysia is not a new nation but a nation with a change of name to Malaysia. This means Malaysia is Malaya and Malaya is Malaysia. UN secretariat legal opinions are also of the opinion that SSS were gifted by UK to enlarge Malaya. Tunku in a book titled Conversation with Tunku Abdul Rahman at page 86 also mentioned Singapore Sabah and Sarawak were a gift to Malaya and Tunku also wrote a letter of thanks to the Queen for the gift.

 Therefore, it was a fraud because there was no referendum at that time for people of Sabah and Sarawak to decide for themselves whether or not they wish to join Malaya to create Malaysia.

UK and Malaya cleverly overcome the need of a referendum to settle this issue by circumventing United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 of right of colonized countries for self determination by way of assessment of 4000 odd Sabahans and Sarawakians by the Cobbold Commission and came with a doctored report to say peoples of Sabah and Sarawak wanted Malaysia. How could these 4000 odds could represent the voice of 1.3 million Borneo people at that time? 

Please read the book by Prof Michael Leigh the demands by Tunku that Cobbold Commission Report must show that peoples of Borneo Territories wanted Malaysia.None of the members of Cobbold Commission could speak and understand the native languages of Sabah and Sarawak and most of our people were illiterate and could not at that time understand English. They could not understand the purpose of the Cobbold Commission which came with a report within weeks only. How could they able to travel the length and breadth of Sabah and Sarawak to find the true wishes of the people?

There are evidence in our hands that those who disagree with MALAYSIA were arrested and tortured and branded as terrorists and communists. They had to save their lives and hid themselves in the jungle and took arms to defend themselves. To take arms to defend yourself against being killed is legal under domestic and international law. 

Sokarneo and the Philippines were against MALAYSIA and this caused the border wars in 1960s which also led to peace settlement by signing the Manila Accord with a promise by Malaya to hold a referendum but until now this was not fulfilled.

Records also showed that officials from the United Nations were "handpicked" to agree with the Cobbold Commission Report. A guy was said known could be bribed.

When fraud was involved in the creation of Malaysia, we could not allow the dead child Malaysia be revived. In law, the law could not help any fraud.

Although in the federal constitution etc it mentioned that Sabah and Sarawak are federated with Malaya or helped formed Malaysia, but in reality, politically Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. 

Malaya controls parliament and the federal cabinet and controls the state government by proxies in past 60 years. Malaya also have political parties from Malaya like PKR, PAS, Bersatu, DAP, MUDA fighting for seats in Sabah and Sarawak. Seats won by them are seats taken away from Sabah and Sarawak. 

Sabah and Sarawak are only given 56 out of 222 MP seats. 

At the moment, not many could be bothered to say MA63 is a fraud or that Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. At the same time, not many feel the pain of loss of marine wealth, oil and gas and natural resources being taken by Malaya because things are not from their pockets.

Under international law, colonizers have the legal right to impose their wills on their colonies including their religion and imposing their culture, language and administration on the colonised. This gave rise to slavery by colonisers against the colonized. Please see Africa until now.

PBK has no means at the moment to set the matter straight due to lack of support, manpower and fund. It is the people's power that is important in politics. I personally believe time will come people will seek justice in the streets and there will be a peaceful revolution against MALAYSIA or the federal government. We have seen this in many African countries and even in the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand had "tasted" street revolution.

 You couldn't seek justice in many matters in Malaysian Court and I had discussed this with an eminent foreign law professor and a foreign judge.

Voon Lee Shan 
President Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Monday 2 October 2023

司法独立

保障民众权利应修法完善司法独立---古威星

司法独立纯粹是为了保护个人和社区司法独立得到保障。让公众获得公平审判。法官公正不阿依法处理案件。

古威星是砂律师公会主席在13/1/2023,沙砂司法年席开幕致辞时如此表示。

说实施司法独立,同时也必须保护法官。法官授予决策权是为保护公众对司法机构的信心。

为了实现更完善司法独立,律师公会认为,有必要修改2009年司法任命委员会法令和联邦宪法,确保各机构:立法;司法,行政,辩护人之间的明确权力。

有必要修改2009年司法任命权的第27条文,以消除首相赋予委任4名最高法官,联邦和上诉庭法官的权力。

还有,联邦宪法第122B条文取消首相向国家元首任命联邦法院,上诉庭和高等法官提出建议的特权。

还有,还有,就是修订2009年委员会法令第5(1)(f)条文,修订首相持有委任4名知名人士担任司法官和委任9名成员组成的委员会的特权。

取而代之,应该是委任利益相关者,其中包括马联邦各个律师公会和律师。我认为NGOs也可以加入组成这委员会。

同时,当然,公民有必要知道自己本身的权益和义务,才有机会伸展正义。

改进就要从总检察长办公室开始。该办公室有必要在网上公布所有相关法律,以方便人民轻松查阅。