*温利山： Why there was* *a confrontation with Indonesia?*
（ 2022-09-22 ）
*为什么与印度尼西亚发生冲突？*
大多数砂拉越人不明白近六十年前，为什么与印度尼西亚发生对抗，这导致担心如果砂拉越独立，会与邻国发生另一场战争。
印度尼西亚-马来西亚对抗或婆罗洲对抗（也以其印度尼西亚/马来语名称 Konfrontasi 着称）是 1963 年至 1966 年的武装冲突，源于印度尼西亚反对建立马来西亚联邦。
1966 年印度尼西亚总统苏加诺被罢免后，争端和平结束，马来西亚成立。 之所以发生对抗，是因为苏加诺说马来西亚的形成是马来亚对婆罗洲领土的新殖民主义，因为马来西亚的形成不符合国际法。
国际法要求举行全民公决，以寻求人民的愿望，无论婆罗洲领土的人民是否想与马来亚联合或想成为自己的独立国家。
砂拉越和沙巴的婆罗洲领土是英国人赠送给马来亚的礼物，以扩大马来亚的领土。 马来亚联邦于 1963 年 9 月 16 日成立后改名为马来西亚。
马来西亚的成立违反国际法和联合国大会第 1514 号决议
许多法律专家认为，Cobbold 委员会的报告是欺诈的产物。 许多反对成立马来西亚的人被贴上了恐怖分子或叛乱分子的标签。 由于害怕骚扰和逮捕，许多人跑进丛林和印度尼西亚边境。 他们被武装部队追捕，被迫拿起武器自卫。 根据国际法，使用武器自卫是允许的。
根据联合国大会第 1514 号决议的要求，英国人试图克服公投的需要和非殖民化的需要，成立了科博德委员会。 Cobbold委员会的任何成员都没有来自沙巴和砂拉越的代表。 马来亚由 Ghazali Shafie 和 Dato Ong Yoke Lin 代表。 许多人认为委员会是有偏见的，而且报告似乎必须表明砂拉越和沙巴的人民倾向于成为马来西亚的一部分。 当事情不利于马来西亚的形成时，东姑并不高兴。 请阅读 Michael Leigh 教授的 The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus 和 Dayaks，了解 Cobbold 委员会报告的不当之处。
*温利山*
*肯雅兰全民党 主席*
*Why there was a confrontation with Indonesia?*
*
Most Sarawakians could not understand why there was a confrontation with Indonesia and this led to fear of another war with neighbouring countries if Sarawak is independent.
The Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation or Borneo confrontation (also known by its Indonesian / Malay name, Konfrontasi) was an armed conflict from 1963 to 1966 that stemmed from Indonesia's opposition to the creation of the Federation of Malaysia.
After Indonesian president Sukarno was deposed in 1966, the dispute ended peacefully and the nation of Malaysia was formed. The reason why the confrontation took place because Sukarno said the formation of Malaysia was a neocolonism of the Borneo Territories by Malaya because the formation of Malaysia was not in accordance with international law.
International law requires a referendum be held to seek the desires of the people whether or not the people of the Borneo Territories wanted to be federated with Malaya or wanted to be independent nation of their own.
The Borneo Territories of Sarawak and Sabah were handed as a gift by the British to Malaya to enlarge the territories of Malaya. The federation of Malaya then took a new name, Malaysia after the federation was formed on 16 September 1963.
The formation of Malaysia was against international law and against the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514
Many legal experts opined that the Cobbold Commission Report was the fruit of a fraud. Many who opposed the formation of Malaysia were branded as terrorists or insurgents. Fear of harassment and arrest, many ran into the jungle and to Indonesian Border. They were hunted by armed forces and they were forced to take arms to defend themselves. Under international law, to defend oneself with arms against arms is allowed.
The British tried to overcome the need of a referendum and the need to decolonization as required by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 formed the Cobbold Commission. None of the members of the Cobbold Commission had any representatives from Sabah and Sarawak. Malaya was represented By Ghazali Shafie and Dato Ong Yoke Lin. Many seen the Commission was biaised and it seems the Report must show people of Sarawak and Sabah favoured to be part of Malaysia. Tunku was not happy when things were not in favour of the formation of Malaysia. Please read The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus And Dayaks by Prof. Michael Leigh about the improperity of the Cobbold Commission Report.
*Voon Lee Shan*
*Parti Bumi Kenyalang*
*Why there was a confrontation with Indonesia?*Most Sarawakians could not understand why there was a confrontation with Indonesia and this led to fear of another war with neighbouring countries if Sarawak is independent.
The Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation or Borneo confrontation (also known by its Indonesian / Malay name, Konfrontasi) was an armed conflict from 1963 to 1966 that stemmed from Indonesia's opposition to the creation of the Federation of Malaysia.
After Indonesian president Sukarno was deposed in 1966, the dispute ended peacefully and the nation of Malaysia was formed. The reason why the confrontation took place because Sukarno said the formation of Malaysia was a neocolonism of the Borneo Territories by Malaya because the formation of Malaysia was not in accordance with international law.
International law requires a referendum be held to seek the desires of the people whether or not the people of the Borneo Territories wanted to be federated with Malaya or wanted to be independent nation of their own.
The Borneo Territories of Sarawak and Sabah were handed as a gift by the British to Malaya to enlarge the territories of Malaya. The federation of Malaya then took a new name, Malaysia after the federation was formed on 16 September 1963.
The formation of Malaysia was against international law and against the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514
Many legal experts opined that the Cobbold Commission Report was the fruit of a fraud. Many who opposed the formation of Malaysia were branded as terrorists or insurgents. Fear of harassment and arrest, many ran into the jungle and to Indonesian Border. They were hunted by armed forces and they were forced to take arms to defend themselves. Under international law, to defend oneself with arms against arms is allowed.
The British tried to overcome the need of a referendum and the need to decolonization of colonies as required by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514, formed the Cobbold Commission.
None of the members of the Cobbold Commission had any representatives from Sabah and Sarawak.
Malaya was represented By Ghazali Shafie and Dato Ong Yoke Lin. Many seen the Commission was biaised and it seems the Report must show people of Sarawak and Sabah favoured to be part of Malaysia. Tunku was not happy when things were not in favour of the formation of Malaysia. Please read The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus And Dayaks by Prof. Michael Leigh about the improperity of the Cobbold Commission Report.
Voon Lee Shan
Parti Bumi Kenyalang
No comments:
Post a Comment