Pages

Powered By Blogger

Wednesday 8 March 2023

把722当做独立日是误导人

肯雅兰全民党主席温利山
2023年3月8日

你不能把 722 等同于独立,因为法律是明确的。只有英国议会通过的议会独立法案才能允许英国殖民地获得独立。这是為何1963年8月31日李光耀宣布新加坡独立时,当时的殖民地大臣说李光耀宣布新加坡独立是无效的。

 1963年 8 月 31 日本來是马来西亚成立的日子,但由于当时的政治环境,马来西亚于 1963 年 9 月 16 日宣布成立。

1957年 8 月 31 日,英国根据英国议会通过的《马来亚独立法》授予马来亚独立。

被称为最高委员会的宁甘内阁不是他选出的,而是由英国总督任命的,内阁中有外籍人士如 PEH Pike,殖民地总检察长坐鎮。如果我记得的话,殖民地财政大臣(我一時忘记了他的名字)也在第一次參加了内阁会议。

英国总督主持了第一次内阁会议,在会议期间他表现出对谁将接替他担任总督而担忧。 Jugah 有意成为州长,但这对屬意于马来人的马来亚来说是不可接受的。砂拉越差一点从巫统那里派來一位來自柔佛的马来亚人来担任砂拉越州长, 但后来由 Tun Openg 被任命为州长。

最高理事会成立时,英国总督甚至没有使用任何术语或将722称为砂拉越的“自治”或“独立”。

 这位总督在 1963 年 9 月 16 日下午离开阿斯塔纳前往新加坡之前,仍然掌握着很大的控制权。若我记忆正确, 从媒体上读到的是总理阿邦佐说他記得1963年9日16日下午其父母和全家人在英国总督离開元首府之后才入住的。

以免公眾受误会, Sim教授可能需要阅读Michael Leigh教授的书籍和AJ Stockwell教授的研究工作以及其他相关书籍、新闻文章和解密文件。

各位读者,请不要认为事情是理所当然的,把政客和公众人物说的话当成正确的。如果我们相信来自我们的政治家和领导人之錯誤言論為正确的,而不通过我们自己的阅读和研究来确认或认清真相,那么我们也会误导他人。

如果不加以纠正,领导者的错误信息和谎言可能会长期留存而误导他人。

You cannot equate 722 with independence because the law is clear. Independence by Britain of her colonies could only be allowed by an Independence Act of Parliament passed by UK PARLIAMENT. This was what the then Secretary of Colonies said when LKY declared Singapore independence on 31 August 1963 which the Secretary of Colonies said the declaration of independence of Singapore by LKY was invalid.

 31 August 1963 was the day that was chosen to have Malaysia formed but due to political circumstances at that moment, Malaysia was declared formed on 16 September 1963.

Malaya was granted independence on 31 August 1963 by UK by Malaya Independence Act passed by UK Parliament. 


The Ningkan Cabinet called Supreme Council was not picked by Ningkan but by the British governor with expatriates in the Cabinet. PEH Pike, the Colonial Attorney General sat in the Cabinet. If I could recall the Colonial Treasury Secretary ( I forgot his name) also sat in the Cabinet on 1st Cabinet Meeting. 

The British governor chaired the first Cabinet meeting and during the meeting he showed concern who would take over from him as a governor. Jugah aimed to be governor but, this was not acceptable to Malaya who preferred a Malay. Sarawak nearly got a Malaya from UMNO to be Sarawak governor. He was from Johore but later Tun Openg was made governor.

The British governor didn't even use any term or refer 722 as "self-government" or "independence" for Sarawak when the Supreme Council was formed. 

 The governor was still very much in control until he left the Astana on the afternoon of 16 September 1963 to Singapore. What I could recall correctly from reading in the press, Premier Abg Johari said his parents and all in the family entered the Astana after the British governor no more occupy the Astana. He recalled it was in the afternoon 16 September 1963.

Prof. Sim may need to read books by Prof Michael Leigh and the research work of Prof. AJ Stockwell and other relevant books, press articles and declassified documents so that the public would not get things wrong  

To readers, please do not take things for granted and take what comes from the mouths of politicians and public figures as correct. If we believe what that comes from our politicians and leaders as correct when they were wrong without doing our own reading and research to confirm or find the truth, we can mislead others too.

A wrong message by a leader could leave a long lasting lie or wrong information if not corrected. 

Voon Lee Shan 
President Parti Bumi Kenyalang

No comments:

Post a Comment