砂设立自家航空是好事

砂拉越设立自家的航空绝对是好事一桩，是迈向航空独立自主。

马来亚代理俞利文对砂拉越要设立自家的航空却怀着如此负面消极的心态。难怪会如此强烈反对。

看汶莱人口才40多万，却拥有14架飞机。以俞大人的心态肯定不认为汶莱需要设立自己的航空。新加坡，这小不点，更没必要设航空。

砂资源比汶莱多太多了。砂土地面积比汶莱大21倍多。

砂拉越早就应该有自己的航空。在各族过年过节，就可以避免年年被亚航和马航掐脖子。还要乞求这些航空行行好事把高昂的机票降低到合理水平。

砂拉越政府要拥有自家的航空当然有考虑各种因素。这是马来亚眼光短浅代理人看不到的。

有了自己的航空，好处实在太多了。不然，各国何必设立自家的航空呢？

Why Dr Yii against Sarawak setting up airline?

On 19th and 22nd April, Dr Yii expressed his negative thoughts and views on setting up Sarawak airline saying that it may not be viable economically and sustainable.

Sarawak airline has not yet started, he jumps to the conclusion painting the pictures of Sarawak being not able to sustain of the airline as it may not be beneficial to Sarawak's interest as a whole.

Brunei is a nation with a population of about 400,000. It has its own airline. It has 14 planes at its disposal. I am not sure if this airline is operating profitably.  

Singapore is a dot on the world map. It also has its own airline but it earns well with the hallmark of good leadership and management.

Instead of being proud of having our own airline, he shows all the contempt and despise. Why?

No doubt, he is an agent of Malaya. I advise him to be more focused on fighting for more at least 30% oil and gas royalties for Sarawak and worry less about the sustainability of Sarawak owing its own airline.

 Be less Umno-minded to be ever-ready to oppress and suppress Sarawak to become more independent in every passing day.

Have trust in the Sarawak government to have done all kinds of feasibility studies before the decision to set up one's own airline.

I believe that at least 90% of Sarawakians are in favour of having our own airline as it can ensure transport connectivity domestically and internationally. 

 Sarawak is on the Borneo island, so it is a must to have our own airline. It is  a necessity.  

Sarawak, for sure, needs to be independent in this respect. Definitely, having our own airline helps to promote tourism in Sarawak further.

Moreover, Sarawakians coming back from overseas are ensure of air tickets charged at reasonable prices.

Nobody will rent a house when he can buy one.

It is irrational and funny to suggest the Sarawak government to use private airlines to provide them incentives and subsidies.

You are so negative-minded to see high investment, high cost and high expertise required as problems. Saying that it may not be beneficial to Sarawak's interest shows that you are so idiotic and short-sighted.

Brunei having low population and Singapore being so small having their own airline , I believe that it doesn't make sense at all to you.

I suggest you to harp on closing down of MAS airline operating at a big loss all the time.  

We are confirmed that Sarawak DAP must be replaced by the local opposition parties.

每年联邦在砂税收多少？

马来西亚联邦财政部副部长Ahmad Muzlan 说落实资源报税计划后期待砂拉2023年税收可以从66亿令吉提高到68亿令吉。

他说根据砂内陆税收局数据，砂2022年总税收是66亿令吉。

马来西亚联邦2022年税收总额是1750令吉。

那么砂拉越石油天然气税收总额到底是多少？ 我们砂人都认为至少1500亿。

砂内陆税收局其他收入是多少？天知道！

报假数，做假帐，是联邦政府的习惯。贪污舞弊滥权是根深蒂固的文化。

建议砂拉越政府自己税收所有本属砂拉越的权利。之后给回56 亿令吉就好了。怎么样？

俞利文狂吠不停反对砂设立自家航空

火箭党俞利文4月19日，22日和26日重复提出他的高见反对砂拉越建立自家航空公司。

他要砂总理和砂政府负责确定这航空公司会带给砂最大的效益。他顾虑总成本，参与方，经济可行和可持续发性。还有亏损估计也要计算在内。

砂总理认为这航空不一定会有盈利可言。这是砂总理个人意见。到时说不定赚得盆满钵满，谁说得准？

俞大人就以会动用公共资金，对砂经济长远影响，其可续性发展就大作文章而且还重复连续作。

他认为给现有的国营和私人航空公司奖掖或津贴就可以稳定机票。补贴真的可以稳定机票吗？更省钱吗？

说创办新航空公司需要额外资金来营运和保养。真是废话，跟狗吠有差别吗？

说创办自己新航空公司要面对种种挑战。还有飞机价格，保养，燃油，保险和其他费用加起来是很昂贵的。

以上说提的种种反对原因，他真的不必邕人自忧。他最为重要的责任就是在联邦议会里不停的重复要求联邦政府提高石油天然气的开采税从5%到30%。

思考一下汶莱人口40多万，他们为什么成立自家拥有10多架飞机的航空公司？ 新加坡，这小不点，为什么需要设立自家航空公司，据说很赚钱。

每年过年过节这些所谓的国营和私人航空公司就喜欢把机票提高到离谱，补贴，怎样省钱,怎样解决问题？

联邦政府这次马来新年补贴9千多万过路费。为什么从来没有同样补贴沙砂机票？俞大人在联邦议会里，有发言声援吗？说开辟更多内陆航线，砂航空公司肯定要贴钱。

说根据记录联邦每年贴飞翼1.9亿令吉在沙砂49个内陆乡镇固定航班服务。沙砂要想开拓更多内陆航线，联邦会善加考虑吗？

用那么悲观负面心态说衔接更多航线需要更多资金，难道其他乡镇沙砂内陆人没有航空服务需要吗？

还看扁砂政府质疑砂经济规模是否有能力维持这航空。已经认定这航空是亏钱货。说到时，还要动用公共资金来拯救。

这就是名符其实的马来亚代理人。对于马航的几乎年年亏损，他完全不提，反而对砂要成立新航空，他却重复，再重复，又重复反对，居心何在？

砂水灾和旱灾

砂水患和旱灾

水患在砂频频上演，这是否跟砂政府到水这财富没有处理得恰当好处有息息相关？

听说，山头上参与滥伐破坏森林的尽是砂高级官爷们。

山顶秃了，大雨小雨就容易拖泥带水下坡去。久而久之，河流就淤泥成灾，可是，政治垄断60年的砂政府始终不乐意把挖掘淤泥的准证开放给外界。

水流不通，怎能不涨积水？

地球暖化，不正常雨量已变成正常。可是砂政盟完全没有采取积极行动。在蓄水措施方面做得非常不到位。所以，水多为患而泛滥。

水淹大地是常景：水淹农地，民房侵泡家具和用具，涨到床铺上，店屋，学校，汽车，马路等等等等。

砂政府每次就只能玩尽赈灾救灾这戏码。

不正常的雨量后，接着就是也不正常的干旱。这种情形都形成常态化。可是，砂政府从来不懂得未雨或旱绸缪，因此，雨量充沛时，不懂得尽量蓄水以备不时之需。

现在，好了，旱灾临头，到处水供不足，这可让水务局手忙脚乱了。

旱灾时，就玩起送水的戏码，甚至花费人民的血汗钱破费去买矿泉水送给灾民。

这些动作，到底解决人民多少缺水问题？

讲到最后，我还是怪砂民太傻了，求变的心太弱了。希望砂民在2026年砂第13届选举会有更大的突破。

Invalid Agreement in Practice

一位可敬的马来亚律师Karam Singh 先生 ( 1959-1964 Damansara 国会议员 ) 于 1963 年 8 月 20 日在马来亚国会的辩论中喊出婆罗洲人民的权利。

 卡拉姆辛格先生指出说，....... (正常来说) 我们会有一位所谓的首席部长指定签署协议。 而现在，没有一位民选总统，没有总统所委派，也没有一位首席部长所指定的（代表签署，所以协议的签署者，他们）都没有在任何宪法中（具有）任何法律地位。

 Karam Singh 先生说明：我认为婆罗洲区域并没有对这项（马来西亚）协议达成适当的协议，因此，作为一个历史事实，这项协议将失败，因为它没有得到婆罗洲人民的民主支持。 而这个（马来西亚）法案不敢说它得到了婆罗洲领土那些人的民主同意。 就这些。

A distinguished Lawyer Mr Karam Singh (MP 1959-1964 Damansara ) spoke out the RIGHTS of Borneo People during the debates in Malayan Parliament at 20th August 1963 。

Mr. Karam Singh said, ....... we have a so-called Chief Minister designate signing the agreement . Now, neither a President electe, nor a President designate , or a Chief Minister designate has any legal standing in any Constitution。

Mr. Karam Singh said: I would submit that there has been no proper agreement by the Bornean territories to this Agreement, and because of that , as a historical fact , this Agreement would fail, because it has not the demoncratic support of the people of the Bornean territories ，and this Bill dares not state that it has the democratic assent of those people . That is all 。

事关于马来西亚的成立

东姑说 马来亚有权接收 沙巴和 砂拉越 ？

 （ 温利山：2023年3月29日 ）

（27/12/1962海峡时报）

新闻稿

ㄍ事关于马来西亚的成立》

由积极人士发掘的一份记录中記載東姑阿都拉曼说：“无论婆罗洲领土发生什么，马来西亚都将在明年 8 月 31 日成立”。他还说，马来西亚的成立是为了将婆罗洲领土从殖民势力手中解放出来，马来亚有权接收沙巴和砂拉越——见海峡时报 1962 27/12/1962海峡时报报导的人民从未要求马来亚将沙捞越和沙巴从英国的殖民主义中解放出来。任何有关砂拉越和沙巴的自由、独立或自决权，都是由砂拉越和沙巴人民决定的。

当时东姑阿都拉曼或马来亚是外国。根本无权干涉砂拉越和沙巴的事务。

东姑或马来亚的干预引发了严重的政治和法律问题。也就是说，“马来西亚”是一个在紧急情况下强制执行的联盟。一个合法、自由和自愿的国家联盟，是要根据联合国大会第 1514 号决议第 2、4 和 7 条文以及 原则第 9 建立的. 該义決 第 2 条规定；所有民族都有自决权，包括自由决定其政治地位和自由谋求其经济、社会和文化发展的权利。

在汶萊于1962年12月8日由Partai Rakyat領導的反馬來西亞起义期間的緊急情況之下, 砂沙人民被拒绝根据联合国大会义决第1514号第9条原則决定他们国家的命运來自由选择马来西亚或独立。这不是根据有关领土人民自由表达的真实意愿行使自决的和平条件。

因此，这让人很怀疑马来西亚是否按照国际法合法成立的，或者还是一个新的殖民地？

因此，沙巴和砂拉越GPS政府需要审视沙巴和砂拉越在马来西亚联邦中的地位。现在有越来越多的沙巴和砂拉越人对马来亚的政治局势蔓延到沙巴和砂拉越感到不满。

鉴于马来西亚的成立充满谜团和混乱，联邦的合法性受到质疑，他们质疑沙巴和砂拉越政府是否明智寻求自治而不是退出马来西亚联邦。他们说，如果我们想要减少马来亚产生的问题，最好的办法就是从马来西亚联邦中寻求独立。

Press Statement

Re: Formation of Malaysia

In a record unearthed by activists, Tunku Abdul Rahman said, “Regardless of whatever happens in the Borneo Territories, Malaysia will come into being on Aug.31 next year”. He also said, Malaysia is to be formed to free the Borneo Territories from the colonial power and it was Malaya’s right of to accept Sabah and Sarawak – see Straits Times 27 December, 1962.

What made Tunku Abdul Rahman or Malaya having the right to decide things for Sarawak and Sabah? Our people never asked Malaya to free Sarawak and Sabah from colonialism of the British. Anything about freedom, independence or self-determination of Sarawak and Sabah were matters for the people of Sarawak and Sabah to decide. 

Tunku Abdul Rahman or Malaya being a foreign country, had no right to interfere with the affairs of Sarawak and Sabah at that time.

The interference by Tunku or Malaya gave rise to a serious political and legal issue. That is, was “Malaysia” a union enforced under emergency in conditions, a legitimate, free and voluntary association of nations established in compliance with Articles 2, 4 and 7 of the United Nations General Assembly Resolution (UNGAR) 1514 and Principle 9 of UNGAR 1514. Article 2 states that all peoples have the right to self-determination, including the right to freely to determine their political status and freely to pursue their economic, social and cultural development.

The people were denied to decide the fate of their nation under Principle 9 of UNGAR 1514 to make a free choice on Malaysia or independence especially, in the middle of an emergency during the Anti-Malaysia Brunei Uprising on 8 December, 1962 led by Partai Rakyat Brunei. This was not a peaceful condition that should exist for the exercise of self-determination based on freely expressed and genuine will of the people of the territories concerned. 

Therefore, this gave to great doubt that Malaysia was legally formed in compliance with international law or was it not just a new colonization?

Therefore, Sabah and GPS Sarawak governments need to examine the position of Sabah and Sarawak in the federation of Malaysia. There is increasing numbers of Sabahans and Sarawakians now that are not happy with the political situations in Malaya spilling over to Sabah and Sarawak. 

Given the formation of Malaysia was shrouded with mysteries and confusion and legality of the federation is in doubt, they questioned the wisdom of the governments of Sabah and Sarawak to seek autonomy rather than exit from the federation of Malaysia. They said if we want lesser problems that are generated from Malaya, the best thing to do is to seek independence from the federation of Malaysia.   

VOON LEE SHAN

President, Parti Bumi Kenyalang

29 March, 2023