古特雷斯对普京表示，他理解俄对乌问题及欧洲和全球安全领域的主张，但这些主张“需根据《联合国宪章》提出的各种工具来解决”。
普京表示，俄罗斯承认“顿涅茨克、卢甘斯克共和国”，是基于历史上科索沃独立的先例，该先例由联合国支持的海牙国际法院通过。
普京说：“世界上这么多国家，包括我们在西方的对手，在科索沃问题上都这样做了。我们只不过对顿巴斯共和国也做了同样的事情”。
他还说：“我清楚地记得国际法院的裁决，该裁决规定，在行使自决权时，任何国家的领土都没有义务向该国中央当局申请宣布其主权的许可”。
Sunday, 22 May 2022
MA63 an international treaty 23/5/22
KUCHING: The Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is not a mere agreement but an international treaty.
It is a legal document registered with the United Nations (UN) and governed by international laws and procedures, said Santubong MP Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar.
He was responding to a suggestion by Deputy Chief Minister Tan Sri James Jemut Masing on Monday for the remaining signatories of MA63 — Sarawak, Sabah and Malaya — to make a new deal.
Masing, who is also Infrastructure Development and Transportation Minister, said the MA63 was rendered null and void after Singapore withdrew from Malaysia in 1965 because no supplementary agreement was signed between Malaya, Sarawak and Sabah to validate the union of the three remaining territories.
Wan Junaidi argued that a new deal was only feasible should the MA63 is ‘void ab initio’ (to be treated as invalid from the outset) or it’s void or voidable after Singapore ceded in 1965, or it may be voidable due to the many breaches
by Malaya.
“Even then, it has to be adjudicated by a court of competent jurisdiction, which is either the Federal Court of Malaysia or the ICJ (International Court of Justice).”
He told the New Sarawak Tribune yesterday that Singapore’s withdrawal might not invalidate the agreement as many countries had opted out of international agreements and yet the UN continued to pursue the fulfilment of obligations by the remaining member states.
Wan Junaidi said, “Firstly, if the MA63 was invalid from the start, would the Act of Malaysia 1963 (UK) and the Act of Malaysia (Malaya) be invalid too?
“Consequently, are the amendments to the Federal Constitution of Malaysia based on the two Acts invalid as well? Secondly, what about the legal position of the Federation of Malaysia after Singapore exited the Federation?
“So, our best avenue is to seek for the legal declaration of validity of the documents through
the ICJ.”
The GPS lawmaker said there is no doubt that Sarawak and Sabah were signatories to the MA63, but does that mean that they were valid parties to it? If not, then the question of locus standi to bring the case to the ICJ will arise.
“You see, both were not independent states at the time of the signing. Could the agreement nevertheless be valid after the declaration of independence on September 16, 1963? These need to be answered.”
Wan Junaidi believed that Sarawak might have to persuade Putrajaya to push for a new deal.
“Then we have to petition London to bring up the case on our behalf, but even if London is willing, it has to seek the consent of Putrajaya to refer the case to the ICJ which only assumes jurisdiction after the disputing parties agreed that the case be brought to it.”
The veteran lawyer said if London refused to become a party to the petition, then the only avenue is to go to the Federal Court of Malaysia.
But remember, we are talking about the goose (Sarawak) that lays the golden eggs … in the billions every year. Tun Dr Mahathir now has to refer the matter to his Cabinet for a decision, but will his colleagues support him? We (Sarawak) have only one representative in the Cabinet. Will he be in support of the drastic move to renegotiate the new deal?” he asked.
“Of course, if the PM and the Cabinet agree then any deal could be negotiated. The state government is urging the federal government to honour all its promises … return all our rights eroded since 1963, etc.”
On whether Sarawak needs a new deal to replace MA63, Wan Junaidi said it depended on what a majority of Sarawakians want.
“The people must know the content of the agreement, the Inter-Governmental Report and the Federal Constitution before they ask about what is not in it.
“I think the Sarawak government has already designed its negotiation with the federal government. So, we’ll cross the bridge when we reach it,” he added.
Saturday, 21 May 2022
Reasons why the regime could prolong their stay? 22/5/22
*Reasons why the regime could prolong their stay*
Elected Representatives (YBs) were given, besides elections funds, funds of RM8 million and ministers RM10 million annually for their constituencies. This was disclosed to me in a recent meeting I had with someone who was in the government managing the government fund.
The village headmen and community leaders were appointed and being given allowances to disseminate the regime's propaganda.
They also placed government officers who are aligned to them at key posts in all sections and departments and also in statutory bodies.
We all know all of these led to abuse of the system and an abuse of democracy.
*How could we defeat them?*
Being in a very much disadvantaged position, we need to find ways to dismantle these evils from the root.
We need to destabilise the appointment of village headmen and community leaders. I know many people are not happy with the appointment of village headmen and community leaders because many of those who were appointed had caused miseries in the community. Some led to the breakup of longhouses and the community.
The only way to do this at the moment is to bring the issue of appointment of the village headmen and community leaders to court. My humble opinion is that their appointments are against customs and unconstitutional.
What we need is to get people who are willing to challenge their appointment and persons who are versed in customs to give expert evidence in court of appointment or election of village and community leaders according to customs of community concerned.
Such suits before the court may not incur much costs and people in the community can easily raise the funds needed to get rid of the system.
Another strategy to dismantle the grip of the regime to hold on to power, is nothing more important than to educate the people the evils of the system of giving free lunch to them.
Remember, in politics and in societal influence money and gifts are not free to those who give. They sweat for it and definitely they want to take back what they have invested.
These gifts and free lunch are like baits to catch fish. Once the fish takes the bait, the fish is caught! People who take gifts and money from people in the regime may feel indebted to repay for their "kindness" by putting or retaining them in power. Once they retain or are in power, they use their power to grab what they could of our riches.
Please see what is happening to Sri Lanka now.
I had observed we talked a lot about independence and Sarawak Rights, but, failed to give reasons why independence and freedom are important to us. I can say most Sarawakians are not aware of the loss of marine wealth, oil and gas resources that affected our lives. I asked a very senior politician about these, he was stunned and stuck because he also didn't know!
Some may know but don't feel painful because these losses never came directly from their pocket.
It was disclosed to me we have lost more than RM750 billion of oil and gas but what we only got was about RM45 billion only.
I observe NCR land issues went stale and had lost its effectiveness to stir people's emotions to topple the regime. It went stale because lawyer-politicians who fought NCR cases have their own agenda whose interests are over and above the interests of NCR landowners.
NCR issues only attracts about 42% of Sarawak's population. NCR issues only attracts the dayaks and some malays, but, not the Chinese. Other races could not be bothered about NCR because NCR had nothing to do with them.
Chinese and other races, are Sarawakians but, not natives, have no land in this country but Sarawak is their country.
Sarawakians including the natives should come to their senses that the loss of their country, Sarawak, should be something more painful than losing the NCR land because NCR land which is less than 20% ( which I doubt this much) is only a small portion of the country that we all lost to a foreign country. By losing our country, we lost our NCR land, we also lost our freedom and independence to manage our affairs.
We lost our right to manage our natural wealth and resources including the management of our country and NCR land.
Please help to explain to our people of our rights
Voon Lee Shan
Parti Bumi Kenyalang
22 May 2022
**(温利山 肯雅兰全民党主席
2022年5月22)**
**執政者继須掌权的原因***
当选的议員除了获得競選基金,每年有八百万选区撥款, 部長則有一千万。这是在我最近与一位在政府中管理政府基金的人会面时向我披露的。
村长和社区领袖被任命并获得津贴，以传播政权的宣传。
他们还将与他们结盟的政府官员安置在所有部门和地区以及法定机构的关键职位上。
我们都知道所有这些都导致了制度的滥用和民主的滥用。
*我们怎么能打败他们？*
处于非常不利的地位，我们需要找到从根本上消除这些邪恶的方法。
我们需要动摇村长和社区领袖的任命。我知道很多人对村长和社区领袖的任命不满意，因为许多被任命的人给社区造成了苦难。一些导致长屋和社区的解体。
目前唯一的办法是将鄉村和社区领袖的任命问题提交法庭。我的拙见是，他们的任命是违反习俗和违法
政权可以延长逗留时间的原因*
这是在我最近与一位在政府中管理政府基金的人会面时向我披露的。
村长和社区领袖被任命并获得津贴，以宣传政权的理念。
他们还将与他们结盟的政府官员安置在所有部门和地区以及法定机构的关键职位上。
我们都知道所有这些都导致了制度的滥用和民主的滥权腐败。
*我们怎么能打败他们？*
处于非常不利的地位，我们需要找到从根本上消除这些邪恶的方法。
我们需要动摇村长和社区领袖的任命。我知道很多人对村长和社区领袖的任命不满意，因为许多被任命的人给社区造成了苦难。一些导致长屋和社区的解体。
目前唯一的办法是将鄉村和社区领袖的任命问题提交法庭。我的拙见是，他们的任命是违反习俗和违法的。
我们需要的是让愿意挑战他们的任命的人和通晓习俗的人，按照有关社区的习俗，在法庭上就鄉村和社区干部的任命或选举提供专业证据。
此类在法庭上的诉讼可能不会产生太多费用，社区中的人们可以轻松筹集摆脱该系统所需的资金。
另一种解除政权控制以保住权力的策略，就是教育人民了解免费午餐制度的弊端。
请记住，在政治和社会影响方面，金钱和礼物对给予的人不是免费的。他们为此付出，而且绝对想收回他们的投资。
这些礼物和免费午餐就像钓鱼的诱饵。当鱼一吃诱饵，鱼就上钩了！向政权中的人那里拿走礼物和金钱的人可能会觉得有义务通过让他们掌权或保留他们的权力来报答他们的“善意”。一旦他们保留或掌权，他们就会利用他们的权力从我们的财富中攫取尽可能多的东西。
请看看现在斯里兰卡发生了什么。
我观察到我们谈论了很多关于独立和砂拉越权力的话题，但未能说明独立和自由对我们很重要的原因。我可以说大多数砂拉越人不知道海洋财富、石油和天然气资源的损失影响了我们的生活。
我问了一位非常资深的政治家，他惊呆了，因为他也不知道！
有些人可能知道但不会感到痛苦，因为这些损失从未直接来自他们的口袋。
据透露，我们已经损失了超过 7500 亿令吉的石油和天然气，但我们只得到了大约 450 亿令吉。
我观察到 NCR（土著习俗权） 的土地问题已经过时，并且已经失去了煽动人们情绪推翻政权的效力。它已经过时了，因为与 NCR 案件进行抗争的律师-政治家有自己的议程，其利益高于 NCR 土地所有者的利益。
NCR 问题只吸引了砂拉越约 42% 的人口。 NCR 问题只吸引达雅克人和一些马来人，但不吸引華裔。其他种族不能为 NCR 烦恼，因为 NCR 与他们无关。
华人和其他种族，是砂拉越人，但不是土著，在这个国家没拥有NCR土地，但砂拉越是他们的国家。
砂拉越人包括土著应该意识到失去他们的国家砂拉越应该比失去 NCR 土地更痛苦，因为 NCR 土地不到国土 20%（我对此表示怀疑）；它只是其中的一小部分。当我们失去我们的国家，我们失去了我们的 NCR 土地，我们也失去了管理我们事务的自由和独立。
请帮助向我们的人民解释我们的权力。
驳回动议22/5/22
砂议长三原因驳回撤销施志豪动议。砂议长可以一时驳回施志豪动议要厘清1974年［石油发展法令］，1966年［大陆架法案］和2021年［领海法］的合法性及不适合用于砂拉越，他能一而再再而三的驳回吗？ 这是逼切必须要解决的事实。砂联盟还有多少时间推搪责任呢？ 2019年法庭的判决也要给砂民合情合理的答案啊！法庭判决石油和天然气归砂邦拥有，砂政盟怎么可以在个人利益考量下，不了了之呢？切记，不要再做背叛砂民权益的事了。
佐哥做的来吗？
佐哥说说捍卫益，砂不向联邦低头。这句话不是第一次说吧？到时，以我看还是弯腰曲背叩头个不停。好像联邦选举要来了，放鞭炮先庆祝。先看看过往他怎么捍卫砂邦权益就可以论断了。就从2019年跟马来亚国油公司的官司判断砂国的石油和天然气的拥有权归谁，事前事后两回事。事前强硬坚持，赢了官司后，不敢不愿坚持强硬我邦权益到底，在你你我我私益交易下，砂邦权益就马上朦了。两次可以当上造王者，私人利益排第一，两次机会都丢了。还有第三次吗？除非砂民是吃屎的。
砂拉越独立大蓝图8/4/22
砂拉越独立大蓝图 8/4/22
独立是砂拉越固有的权力。简而言之，砂拉越是有100%权力独立的。 这是联合国赋予殖民地人民的权力。
在1963年12月14日，联合国【去殖民化】过程中的1514号议决案宪章就很清楚规定。因此，世界列强都纷纷归还殖民地于当地人。
当时，咱们砂拉越很不幸的被英国强硬的加入马来亚联邦 （更名为马来西亚）。其实当时，英国政府理应让砂拉越独立去。可是，英国政府有不良的企图心，因此，使砂拉越被马来亚殖民到今天。
要重建砂拉越为独立国，砂拉越独立使者必须努力去灌输砂民爱砂拉越情操。告诉砂人，咱们可以用和平和合法的途径寻求砂拉越独立。
启发砂人【起心动念】热爱母国砂拉越，把爱护砂拉越这情操看成砂人的责任和义务。砂人必须【相信】砂拉越可以在【集体意愿独立】下会成为像新加坡或文莱一个独立的国家，拥有主权管理砂拉越一切政经文教的事务，完全自主，不用听命于任何人指挥和决定。
在每个砂人心中栽种砂拉越独立的念头，而后这信念会提升成砂人的信仰。这种【相信】砂拉越可以独立的【信念/念头】，一旦转化成一股无法阻挡的【信仰】力量，砂拉越独立这大工程在理所当然下完成了。 BL
The Blue-print of Sarawak Independence 8/4/22
Independence is the intrinsic right of Sarawak. In short, Sarawak has 100% the right to independence. This is the human right that the United Nations has given to the colonial people.
On December 14, 1963, the United Nation in the Decolonisaton process of GAR 1514 clearly stipulated this human right. Therefore, the world powers were forced to return the colonies to the locals.
At that time, Sarawak was unfortunately joined by the United Kingdom to the Federation of Malaya (renamed as Malaysia). In fact, at that time, the British government should have allowed Sarawak to become independent. However, the British government had bad intentions, so Sarawak has been colonized by Malaya to this day.
To rebuild Sarawak as an independent nation, the Sarawak Independence Messengers must work hard to instill love for Sarawak in Sarawakians. It is to tell Sarawakians that we can seek Sarawak independence through peaceful and legal means.
Arouse the sentiment of Sarawakians to love Sarawak, our motherland and to care for Sarawak as our responsibility and obligation. Sarawakians must [believe] that Sarawak can become an independent country like Singapore or Brunei under the [collective will for independence], with the sovereignty to manage all political, economic, religious, cultural and educational affairs in Sarawak, completely autonomous and not subject to anyone's commands and decisions.
The idea of Sarawak independence is to be planted in every Sarawakian. And this belief will be elevated to become the faith in their hearts. The [faith] that Sarawak can become independent, once transformed into a force, the great project of Sarawak's independence will be completed in the course of time. BL
迷途的砂拉越人8/4/22
迷途的砂拉越人 8422
砂拉越人的精神状态如何？这就得看多少砂拉越人有身份和文化认同的问题，是否以身为砂拉越人为傲，尊重砂拉越各种族传统文化, 多热心去探讨追究砂拉越历史事迹，期盼砂拉越成为一个独立自主国家。。
砂拉越人的历史在那儿？ 在2013年之前，S4S/砂拉越人的砂拉越还未崛起之前，砂拉越人完全被马来亚政府控制，狠狠被洗脑。所以，砂拉越在砂人的脑海中的轮廓是模糊不清的。是的，我的心目中就是这模样。广播媒体不间断的灌输马来西亚是咱们的国家和咱们是马来西亚人。无论如何，当时我心里深处还是完全无法认同跟千里之外的一个土地想成一个国家。
早在2000年之前，个人就在探索，参考现况，总觉得砂拉越完全没有被尊重，是被殖民。这种觉醒还是在初步阶段。是的，我一直有追踪任何新闻涉及砂拉越独立的事。 在2018，我是第一次参加谈论政治的微信群时，我才真正接触和深一层认识砂拉越的历史。透过集体的传播力量，后来，才知道MA63为何物？原来，独立是咱们砂拉越固有的权力，也是人权。
那么砂拉越人为何不独立去呢？关键原来是当今政府不想独立。看AbangJohari已经说了多少回绝不脱马独立。只要，AbangJohari这只领头羊，以现有76席位的优势，有这意愿，他就可以和他的团队/砂政盟在砂拉越DUN里通过一个砂拉越独立法令，然后，公告天下，砂政盟的决定，同时禀告联合国并且向它申请成为会员国。砂拉越独立程序就这么完成了。
砂拉越要独立，首先一定要有砂民成后盾，全力支持砂拉越独立，不然，一切都免谈。
这50多年来去，砂拉越人就是这样或那样被外来的势力和自家的政党耍弄得团团转而昏头转向，不知所措。这一切都跟【未知】息息相关。
一些地方像澳门，台湾和香港都是中国的省份，无论怎样都不能获得独立。嘉泰罗尼亚是西班牙的自治区，他们早年因为婚姻关系签了一份合约是永远不分离的，所以无望独立。谈独立公投很多人喜欢举例苏格兰。苏格兰第一次独立公投失败，是否还有机会来第二次就得看英国政府的意愿。
咱们砂拉越情形跟以上我所提到的国家截然不同。咱们是被外邦人假借马来西亚联邦之名来殖民咱们砂沙两邦国，其中有很重其诈骗成分而成立这假联邦。把这些迷途的砂人带回原途，咱们必须加倍努力灌输砂拉越独立理念。让他们相信砂拉越是有100%权力独立。使他们心生这种信念而产生这信仰 ，砂拉越独立大事离咱们还有多远呢？请相信【相信】的力量，信念的重要和信仰的同在完成砂拉越独立程序。 BL
Lost Sarawakians 8422
What is the mental state of Sarawakians? It depends on how Sarawakians accept and identify themselves as Sarawakians culturally and spiritually, whether they are proud to be Sarawakians and respect the traditional culture of various ethnic groups in Sarawak. We are eager to explore and investigate the historical facts of Sarawak, and hope that Sarawak will become an independent country.
Where is the history of Sarawakians? Before 2013, before the S4S/Sarawak for Sarawakians emerged, the minds of Sarawakians were completely controlled by the Malayan government and were severely brainwashed. Therefore, the outline of Sarawak in the minds of Sarawak is vague. Yes, that was what I had in mind once. The mass media constantly instills that Malaysia is our country and that we are Malaysians. In any case, deep down in my heart at that time, I still couldn't identify with Malaysia a country a land thousands of miles away.
As early as 2000, personally, I was exploring and referring to the situation of Sarawak, I always felt that Sarawak was not respected at all and was colonised. This awakening was then in its budding stages. Yes, I had been following any news concerning Sarawak independence. In 2018, when I joined a WeChat group talking about politics for the first time, I really got in touch with and had a deeper understanding of the history of Sarawak. Through the collective power of propagation, only muc later did I know what MA63 is? I found out that Sarawak independence is our intrinsic right, and it is also a human right.
So why don't Sarawakians go independently? The reason is that the current government does not want independence. Look at how many times Abang Johari has said that he will never secede for independence. As long as Abang Johari, the leader, with the advantage of the existing 76 seats, has the will, he can pass a Sarawak independence decree with his team/Sarawak DUN, and then announce to the world, the Sarawak Political Alliance's decision, and at the same time let the United Nations know and apply for membership. The Sarawak Independence Process will be completed then.
For Sarawak to become independent, it must first have the backing of Sarawakians to fully support Sarawak independence, otherwise, everything will be in vain. BL
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)