Pages

Powered By Blogger

Friday, 12 January 2024

Game over for opposition

*Game Over For Opposition – Mahathir’s Super-Rich Children In Trouble After “Dubai Move” Failed & 120 MPs’ Bluff Exposed*

FINANCE TWITTER 
January 10th, 2024

King Sultan Abdullah has spoken, and he specifically told Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim during a pre-cabinet meeting on Tuesday (Jan 9) that the Palace would not get involved in any political manoeuvre. Basically, the monarch was saying that he is busy packing his stuff before moving back to Pahang as his term as the 16th Yang di-Pertuan Agong (King) ends on January 30, 2024.

Actually, as early as February last year (2023), the King already expressed his desire for the current unity government to remain until the end of its term. Since his appointment as the Agong on Jan 31, 2019, his impressive resume included working with four prime ministers, first hung Parliament in the country’s history, multiple coups and political instability due to power-crazy politicians.

From Mahathir’s abrupt resignation on Feb 24, 2020 in a despicable “Sheraton Move” to help Muhyiddin seize power to stop Anwar from taking over, before traitor Muhyiddin was forced to resign on August 16, 2021 after just 17 months in power, to the appointment of yet another backdoor prime minister – Ismail Sabri – on August 21, 2021, the King was sick and tired of political coups.

After the 15th General Election (Nov 2022), the country faced its first hung Parliament when none of the three major coalitions – Barisan Nasional, Perikatan Nasional and Pakatan Harapan – managed to secure enough seats to form the government. Anwar-led Pakatan finally formed the federal government with Barisan after Muhyiddin-led Perikatan arrogantly rejected a Unity Government proposed by the King.

It was a huge tactical mistake for Perikatan Nasional, after which there were uncountable plotting and scheming to overthrow Anwar administration. Nationalist Bersatu and PAS Islamist party, two major components of the opposition, simply could not live without power after 33 months of indulging in corruption, abuse of power, money laundering and whatnot.

By hook or by crook, the opposition must stage another backdoor deal to return to power. When Anwar Ibrahim took over the country, his pledge to crack down on corruption was initially seen as nothing but political rhetoric. After all, Malaysian institutions, including the Royal Malaysia Police and the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC), were seen as corrupt.

However, it started to raise more eyebrows when PM Anwar repetitively dropped hints – even pressured – the MACC to act without fear or favour. The premier said enforcement agencies should take immediate action against irregularities at the various levels regardless of position and ideology. In fact, he gave the “green light” for MACC to probe allegations of corruption against any minister or government official.

Things became spicy when MACC chief commissioner Azam Baki revealed how Anwar told him not to wait for his instructions to investigate anyone involved in corruption – suggesting that the anti-graft buster was not fully independent and had all along been a tool of previous prime ministers. When Anwar said the very rich and powerful people, even those with “Tun” title, can be investigated, the MACC finally sprang into action.

The recent “Dubai Move” – in reference to the Opposition and government leaders hatching a despicable scheme to seize power via backdoor while holidaying in the UAE (United Arab Emirates) – was just a follow-up to endless secret meetings held since Nov 2022 general polls, intensified after multiple corruption charges slapped on opposition leaders, including Bersatu president and ex-PM Muhyiddin Yassin.

Just because Mahathir has denied travelling to Dubai does not mean he did not participate. There’s something called Zoom or video conferencing. In fact, ex-PM Mahathir was the prime mover of Dubai Move, who together with his biggest financier and most trusted lieutenant, former finance minister Daim Zainuddin, were willing to splash RM750 million to bribe MPs to go against Anwar.

Some simpletons might think it was insane, even preposterous, to believe that billionaire Daim would spend so much money. But they had no idea how rich Tun Dr Mahathir and Tun Daim were after more than two decades of stealing and plundering national coffers. It’s not an exaggeration to say that RM750 million was like loose change for Daim, what more Mahathir.

Daim had accumulated so much money that he actually once owned a Swiss bank – ICB Banking Group – which operated approximately 222 branches and 130 ATMs worldwide. Under the banking group, it owned another 14 banks throughout Asia. In addition, he was reported to own at least RM65 billion worth of shares in Malaysia stock market.

It’s worth to note that the Dubai Move was triggered only “after” the MACC seized the 60-storey Menara Ilham owned by the family of Daim on Dec 18, 2023. The tower, designed by award-winning “Foster + Partners” and built at an estimated cost of US$580 million (RM2.7 billion), is the crown jewel of Daim’s fortune. And it was seized because Daim repetitively refused to entertain MACC’s petition to declare his and his family’s financial holdings.

Daim probably thought he was so rich and influential that he was untouchable. Even if he wanted to, the tycoon can’t explain the source of his incredible wealth. Therefore, his 274m-tall skyscraper along with other assets – both domestic and foreign – were seized under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act (AMLA) and Section 41 of the MACC Act.

The bold move effectively cuts Mahathir’s access to funding to overthrow Anwar. To make matters worse, a “Plan-B” to smuggle RM750 million cash to bribe MPs to declaring their “loss of confidence” in Anwar government was similarly intercepted and thwarted, thanks largely to Anti-Terrorism Financing Act, which grants the authorities with the power to seek cooperation from foreign powers.

Money talks and bullshit walks. After the RM750 million went missing, disgraced blogger-turn-fugitive Raja Petra Kamarudin, the mercenary who operates Malaysia-Today portal, was paid to cook a half-baked story about 120 MPs having sent statutory declarations to the Palace indicating that they do not support Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s unity government.

But the so-called five-page long list of 120 MPs who had lost faith in the PM was so fake and laughable that even Parti Pribumi Bersatu Malaysia’s Youth chief Wan Ahmad Fayhsal Wan Ahmad Kamal quickly clarified that no statutory declarations were signed by opposition Perikatan Nasional to overthrow the government – a slap in the face of Raja Petra before even the King cares to comment.

Interestingly, Bersatu somehow appears not as anxious or optimistic to topple the prime minister this round, largely because Muhyiddin was not the sole prime minister candidate and partly because the party might consider switching sides to support Anwar in exchange for dropping of corruption charges. From the beginning, it has been Mahathir and PAS Islamist party who vigorously blow the trumpet on Dubai Move and 120 SDs.

Not only the clumsily produced list of 120 MPs contained the name of Democratic Action Party chairman Lim Guan Eng as one of the signees who have lost confidence in Anwar leadership, the claim that GPS (Gabungan Parti Sarawak) was on the bandwagon had been rubbished by Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg as a “waste of time”.

With outgoing King Sultan Abdullah officially said he was not interested to even look at the dubious 120 SDs, it’s game over for any evil plan to seize power using statutory declaration, of which the document itself can be easily forged. The new Agong – Sultan Ibrahim of Johor – has made it crystal clear that one of his primary missions is to hunt all the corrupt people.

The hidden message behind Sultan Ibrahim was simple – it is revenge time and the Royal House would make sure Mahathir, now powerless, along with his wealthy children get the opportunity to explain how they accumulate their fortune. Of course, like crooked Daim Zainuddin, the family of Mahathir is in trouble as they too won’t be able to justify their riches.

As a start, the MACC may dig into how the ex-premier enriched his family with one of the most explosive scandals in the 1990s – the bailout of his son’s Konsortium Perkapalan Berhad in 1998. In fact, the primary reason Mahathir had sacked Anwar was not merely because both men disagreed on the method to tackle the 1997-1998 Asia Financial Crisis plaguing the country.

In March 1998, Malaysia International Shipping Corp (MISC) announced that it would acquire Mirzan company. The news triggered accusations of a bailout at a time when the country was facing its economic troubles. The sale included US$55 million for Hong Kong-based Pacific Basin Bulk Shipping, which Mirzan’s Konsortium bought for US$230 million in 1996 as part of an aggressive regional expansion campaign.

In addition, MISC bought the assets of KPB’s Malaysia-based PNSL Bhd for US$165 million, which Mr Mirzan purchased for RM247.4 million from a state agency in 1992. Not only MISC handed over a total US$220 million to Mirzan, who owned 51% of Konsortium, but would also take over a net debt of US$311 million from the acquired companies.

Interestingly, even before the 1997 Asia Financial Crisis, Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd had already accumulated RM1.7 billion debt (end of 1996) under Mirzan leadership. It was so bad that there were naughty rumours the Mahathir’s son was considering “suicide” over the massive debts. Without the bailout, Mirzan would go bankrupt as KPB’s market value was almost wiped out during the financial crisis.

The best part was the main shareholder of MISC was Petronas, the national oil company which comes directly under the Prime Minister Office. Thanks to his daddy, Mirzan’s debt in KPB was settled. Clearly, not only Mahathir had abused his power to rescue Mirzan, but had also enriched his son by bailing out Konsortium Perkapalan Bhd.

The burning question is from where did his son get all the money to fund his purchase in KPB, not to mention other companies like Petron, Malaysian Helicopter Services, Lion Corp, Artwright Holdings, Dataprep Holdings, Leader Universal, Diperdana Corp and whatnot. This will be the same question that MACC is asking the family members of Daim Zainuddin.

As early as 1994, Mirzan bought at a 24% discount to the market price 1.5 million shares in steel cable firm Leader Universal, under a preferential state allocation scheme to transfer corporate ownership to bumiputras or indigenous people. At the age of 37 in 1998, analysts valued Mirzan Mahathir’s holdings in public companies alone to be in excess of US$880 million. He was said to sit on the board of 95 companies in 1999.

The rescue of his son’s company came just six months after Mahathir Cabinet announced on September 3, 1997 of the creation of a special RM60 billion fund for “selected Malaysians” – understood as a bail-out facility designed to save “cronies”. Besides Petronas, Employees Provident Fund (EPF) money had been deployed to bail out some of the most politically well-connected and influential.

Other companies that enjoyed mega bailouts, just to name a few, included UEM-Renong, Malayan Banking, Bank Bumiputra, Sime Bank, KUB, Bank of Commerce, RHB Bank, Ekran’s Bakun Dam Project, Park May-Intrakota bus and Monorail. A whopping RM2.34 billion of taxpayers’ money was used – quietly – to bail out UEM-Renong alone, which was linked to Mahathir’s political party UMNO.

But Mirzan was not the only lucky son with strong cable to enrich him. Mokhzani Mahathir, the second eldest son of the former prime minister, joined the ranks of the country’s top 10 richest people in 2014 on the 9th spot – worth an estimated RM4.22 billion. In early Nov 2012, Petronas awarded a RM700 million contract to the SapuraKencana Petroleum mogul.

Billionaire Mokhzani also became the largest shareholder of the Pantai Group of hospital after acquired it from Berjaya Group founder Vincent Tan, who happens to be one of Mahathir’s cronies. Pantai hospital was part of Parkway Holdings Ltd, which in turn was started by Malaysians (Tan family of IGB Corp and the Ang family of Petaling Garden) in the 1970s.

Together with another brother, Mukhriz and Mokhzani were awarded contracts in optical fibre manufacturer Opcom Holdings Berhad, which had profited from the RM21.6 billion project of the National Fiberisation and Connectivity Plan (NFCP). According to the opposition, close to 500 companies were registered under the names of Mahathir and four of his children.

While 16 companies were under Mahathir Mohamad’s name and 29 were under his daughter Marina’s name, a jaw-dropping 156 were under Mirzan’s name and 158 were under Mokhzani’s whereas 126 were under Mukhriz’s name. The MACC and the courts will be having fun grilling every single offspring of Mahathir, exposing how they get mega rich so young and so easily.

Tuesday, 9 January 2024

The impact of social behaviour... among Malays

*The Impact of Social Behavior on the Election of Ineffective Leaders Among Malays*

By Prof UCHIDA, Yukiko
University of Kyoto

_*Introduction:*_
The social behavior of Malays in Malaysia plays a significant role in shaping their mindset when it comes to electing leaders. This essay will delve into the influence of short-sightedness on the decision-making process, shedding light on the reasons behind the re-election of ineffective leaders and its consequences on the country's progress and development.

*_The Cycle of Electing Ineffective Leaders:_*
Malaysians of Malay descent have been observed to display a trend of being easily swayed and lacking discernment when it comes to their political choices. They often engage in a cycle of switching allegiance between political parties without thoroughly evaluating their options. This behavior demonstrates a short-sighted mindset, as decisions are made based on temporary factors rather than considering the long-term implications. Consequently, this behavior perpetuates a cycle that hampers the progress and development of the nation.

_*Forgetting the Failures of Past Leaders:*_
A noteworthy aspect of the short-sightedness observed among Malays is their tendency to forget about the failures of past leaders. This propensity may stem from a desire for change and a reluctance to dwell on the past. However, failing to critically address the mistakes and shortcomings of previous leaders can inadvertently enable ineffective governance and create obstacles to the country's growth.

_*Manipulability through Appeals to Religion and Race:*_
Another factor contributing to the short-sighted mindset among Malays is their vulnerability to appeals based on religion and race. Malays often prioritize these factors over assessing the capabilities and competence of potential leaders. This susceptibility allows leaders to manipulate Malays' sense of identity and emotions, effectively extracting political gain by leveraging their faith and heritage. Consequently, Malays may unknowingly overlook crucial evaluations of leaders based on their track records and abilities.

*_Contrast with Chinese Malaysians:*_
Contrasting the aforementioned behavior, Chinese Malaysians approach politics differently. They tend to exhibit a more reserved nature when it comes to publicly displaying support for particular leaders or parties. Instead, they rely on existing clan associations and business connections to negotiate privately with political parties, demanding policies and favors that align with their interests. This approach empowers the Chinese community to prioritize their own concerns and maximize desired outcomes, rather than solely relying on the re-election cycle.

_*Conclusion:*_
The short-sightedness of Malays in re-electing ineffective leaders and disregarding past failures has a detrimental impact on progress and development within Malaysia. To ensure sustainable growth, it is crucial for Malays to engage in a thorough evaluation of leaders, considering their capabilities, competence, and track record, rather than being swayed by appeals to religion and race. By learning from past experiences and making informed choices, Malaysians can collectively work towards effective governance and national development.

Prof UCHIDA, Yukiko
University of Kyoto
26 Jul 2023 Kuala Lumpur

Sabah and Sarawak can exit Malaysia...

Sabah and Sarawak can exit Malaysia with or without Independence Act, claim two activists

JOINT STATEMENT By Sabah Sarawak NGOs Borneo Plight in Malaysia Foundation (BoPiMaFo) and Sabah Sarawak Rights Australia New Zealand (SSRANZ) BoPiMaFo & SSRANZ Presidents Mssrs Daniel John Jambun and Robert Pei on the right to seek independence.

BOPIMAFO & SSRANZ Presidents referring to a press statement by Bukit Semuja assemblyman and GPS Youth Chief Miro Simuh (reported on 03/01/2024), pointed out that contrary to his claim, the Federal Constitution does not prohibit the right for Sarawak or Sabah to exit the federation nor is it constitutional for any law such as the Sedition Act 1948, to prohibit this right. If so, this would only confirm that Malaysia was not a free and voluntary association of four countries created in 1963.
(see https://www.theborneopost.com/2024/01/03/miro-calls-voons-dubai-move-claim-of-pms-post-promise-for-gps-a-publicity-stunt/ )
  
They said it was unfair to criticise Mr Voon Lee Shan President of the Bumi Kenyalang Party (PBK), who was just performing his duty as a loyal Sarawakian to fight for Sarawak rights, especially the inalienable legal right to independence under international law recognised by the United Nations’ Resolution 1514. In fact, other than the PBK, no Sarawak or Sabah party has consistently called for independence from Malaysia owing to 60 years failure of the federation. There should be no limitation on this discourse in an association claimed by federalists to be a freely formed democratic federation.

They noted that the PBK President had also assisted 12 Plaintiffs to file a writ in the High Court of Borneo, seeking declarations on the validity of MA63 in 2021 and right to exit for independence. 

The fact that the former British colonies of Sarawak and Sabah were incorporated by the United Kingdom and Malayan governments as new members of the Federation of Malaysia in 1963 does not extinguish this right for several reasons.

The Federation of Malaysia was created by an international treaty the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) registered with the United Nations in 1970 and therefore governed by international law. International law does no prohibit secession from a federation. It is the intrinsic right of any member in a free association to unconditionally and freely exit at any time. 

This issue was raised in the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) discussions before MA63 was signed on 9 July 1963 when both the Sarawak and Sabah sides demanded the right to exit be included in the constitution. Lord Lansdowne, the IGC Chairman who described Malaysia as a “buttress of freedom in Asia”, dissuaded them by stating that “any state voluntarily entering a federation had the intrinsic right to secede at will and therefore it was unnecessary to include it in the constitution”. 

This was again clarified by the then Malayan Prime Minister Tunku Abdul Rahman 9 days after the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) was signed, who was reported on 18 July 1963, as saying that “the regions that join Malaysia have freedom to exit the federation if the new nation will not bring any benefit to them”.

However, this was not the original position of the then Malayan Government which insisted that “there be no right to secede” from the federation. This was at odds with the fact that the Malayans went through the motion of consulting Sarawak and Sabah to demonstrate that the union was the free and voluntary wish of the people but in reality, it was just to entrap them in their proposed union. 

Typically Malaysia federalists assert that “Point 7 of the Sabah 20 Points” agreement” prohibited secession. The NGO presidents pointed out that the “20 Points” was only a memorandum of terms and conditions provided to the IGC, not a legally binding agreement signed by the MA63 signatories nor incorporated as the law in MA63 or the federal constitution. 

In 1962, the British colonial secretary revealed their entrapment strategy by stressing to the Malayan government the political advantages which might accrue both to “H.M.G. and to the Government of the Federation of Malaya if Malaysia was seen as voluntary merger rather than transfer, merger rather than absorption”. (Para 142 Stockwell “The Making of Malaysia). 

Thus the world and Borneo people were led to believe that the admission of new members to the federation was a free and voluntary act. 

The NGO presidents said those opposing Sabah and Sarawak independence also erroneously claim that the Sedition Act 1948 was amended to prohibit “secession”. However, they pointed out that there is no such prohibition in the ACT 1485 amendment of the Sedition Act in 2015 or any other Acts.

They pointed out that the failure to resolve MA63 issues of State Autonomy, seat allocation, loss of control of the civil service and education, resources and revenue from oil and gas, lack of development and infrastructures and poverty, Sabah’s 40% revenue entitlement, Ketuanan Melayu race and religion concept replacing MA63 concept of secularism, pluralism and multiculturalism, and illegal migrants have led to the widespread sentiment for independence. The recent call to amend the Constitution for a Malay/Muslim government and a Malay PM only, has aroused more calls for independence.

The NGO Presidents considered that MA63 was void ab initio and not legally binding from the date it was signed as Sarawak and Sabah were still colonies and not sovereign states with the legal capacity to make binding international treaties. This meant that Malaysia was not legitimately constituted and decolonisation was in fact replaced by Malayan recolonisation. The MA63 negotiations since 2016 cannot have any legally binding effect since MA63 was null and void from the beginning. 

However, even if MA63 was valid, the multiple breaches of fundamental and foundational terms of the agreement since 1965 would have terminated the treaty and legally entitle Sarawak and Sabah to exit as free independent nations. 

They called on both the Sarawak and Sabah government to seek a proper resolution of the question of MA63 validity especially in view of the International Court of Justice’s decision in the Chagos Case 2019 that colonies have no legal capacity to make binding international agreements and hold a referendum to let the people freely decide on the value or benefit for the 2 states to continue as members of the federation. A referendum should only be held after a period of at least two years to allow all parties to inform the people of the pros and cons of exit and independence.

Signed by
Daniel John Jambun President BoPiMaFo
Robert Pei President SSRANZ.

What happened to Sabah constitutional rights?

https://m.malaysiakini.com/letters/616214 LETTER | *What happened to Sabahan's constitutional rights?* 
Remy Tony Sulil Majangkim
Published: Mar 29, 2022 11:33 AM

LETTER | The *Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) was signed in London on July 9, 1963,* and *the British Parliament enacted a law on July 31, 1963, called the Malaysia Act Chapter 35.*

Henceforth, the *formation of Malaysia in 1963 with Malaya and the British colonies comes with sets of conditions*, which had been *agreed upon by Malaya to undertake*. 

One of *their obligations is the financial provision to the state of Sabah, affixed in the MA63 and inserted in the Federal Constitution*.

These *obligations can be seen in the financial provision of the MA63* and *under Article 112C, 112D and in the tenth schedule under Part IV, special grants to the states of Sabah & Sarawak (Part 2) of the Federal Constitution.* 

*Sabahans have been clamouring for the provision (40 percent)* as it is clearly stated in the *Federal Constitution, for years*.

Our *present Sabahan politicians have failed, ignored and delayed indefinitely*, what should be *our constitutional rights*. 

We are also *shocked to learn that a gazetted announcement labelled “secret*” has been *uncovered by the opposition*, which shows that the *federal government in 1970 (less than seven years after signing MA63), ceased to pay the states the 40 percent of the total net revenue collected* from the states. 

The *gazette worded in both Malay and English in Article 2 “hendak-lah berhenti” and “shall cease” payment,* is in *serious breach💔 of the Malaysia Agreement 1963*.  

*Any changes made to these Articles (112C & 112D)* that has had *a direct connection to the MA63 treaty*, *requires the signatories to go back* to the negotiation table, which then *requires calling back the landowner, the British.* 

Coincidentally, what also needs to be known is that *constitutional safeguards are in place in the Federal Constitution, specifically in Art 169(C) under International Agreement and Article 76.* 

The recent constitutional amendment inserting Malaysia Day in the Federal Constitution thus strengthens our identity.

The *inconsistency is glaring, as any changes to the gazette require changes* in the written constitution *under Art 160A by order of the Yang d-Pertuan Agong*.

*Yet, for over a span of 50 years*, those *changes in the constitution have never happened*. 

The *government of the day* has an *obligation to fix* this *abnormality* and *pay Sabah its dues*. 

*Any attempt to avoid doing so* shall *result in the beneficiaries acting accordingly and declaring invalid the MA63* because of this *breach of the agreement.*

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Sunday, 7 January 2024

Important contact number

*Important contact numbers to keep handy for yourself and others*.
Help is a just phone-call or a text message away.... 

*POLICE EMERGENCY 112

*AIR SELANGOR: 15300

TNB,/LLN. 15454

Plus HIGHWAYS EMERGENCY:
CHANGE TYRES PUNCTURE. 
       1800880000
        03 26920000

*Talian Kasih* : 15999 (24 hours) ; 019- 261 5999 (Whatsapp)

*Befrienders* : 03- 7627 – 2929 (all calls are FOC) sam@befrienders.org.my

*Mercy Psychosocial support helplines*: 03-2935-9935 / 014-3223392 / 011-63995482 / 011-63994236 (Mon-Fri: 8am – 5pm)

*Crisis Preparedness & Response Center (CPRC) *: 03-8881 0200 / 03-8881 0600 / 03-8881 0700 / Whatsapp: 013-9279 454 / 010-9699 435 (8am -5 pm)

*WAO : Domestic Violence cases* - +6018 988 8058 (Whatsapp)
+603 3000 8858 (24 hour hotline)

*Buddy Bear child hotline* : 1800182327 (for children to call in)
Mon- Sun (12pm – 2 am Call)
Mon- Sun (6pm – 12 am messages)

*Naluri*: 03-8408-1748 (24 hours)

*Sneham*: 1800-22-5757 (Mon- Fri 24 hours)

*GEM helpline*: 011-2528 9610 / 011-5994 4384 (Mon- Fri: 2-4pm; 7:30 – 9:30pm)

*National Cancer Society of Malaysia*: 1800-88-1000 (Mon- Fri: 8:30 am – 4:30pm)

*Malaysia Positive Psychology Association*: 012-878 5357 (Mon-Fri: 10am -12pm; 2-4 pm)

*Malaysia Mental Health Association*: 03-2780 6803
 
*Lifeline* : 011-1095 9595 (We Chat/ Line)
*Police / Ambulance* : 999 / 112
*Bomba / Ambulance* : 994/ 112
*Hospital Kuala Lumpur* : 03-26155555
*Pusat Perubatan University* : 03-7949 4422
*AIR SELANGOR
15300

*1MALAYSIA ONE CALL CENTRE. (1MOCC)
ALL GOVERNMENT DEPARTMENTS CONNECTIONS.

O3-80008000

IJM HEART ATTACK EMERGENCY NO. 
1300885111

Saturday, 6 January 2024

Gaji VVIP

*ANALISIS GAJI DAN ELAUN VVIP SEBULAN DI MALAYSIA.*

*AHLI POLITIK*

*1. PM* - RM75 Ribu.
*2. Menteri* - RM65 Ribu.
*3. MB* - RM60 Ribu.
*4. Ahli Parlimen* - RM52 Ribu.
*5. ADUN* - RM38 Ribu.

*6.* Gaji Minima Ketua Kg/MPKK - *RM1,200*

*PENJAWAT AWAM*

*1. KSN* - RM42 Ribu.
*2. KSU* - RM38 Ribu.
*3. PAT/IGP/SUK* - RM38 Ribu.
*4. JUSA A* - RM38 Ribu.

*5.* Gaji Minima Staf B40 - *RM1,500*

*SYARIKAT GLC*

*1. CEO TNB* - RM958 Ribu.
*2. CEO Petronas* - RM900 Ribu.
*3. CEO Maybank* - RM660 Ribu.
*4. CEO Khazanah* - RM650 Ribu.
*5. CEO Sime Darby* - RM606 Ribu.
*6. CEO CIMB* - RM605 Ribu.

*SYARIKAT KORPORAT*

*1. CEO Genting* - RM12 Juta.
*2. CEO Axiata* - RM3.5 Juta.
*3. CEO Public Bank* - RM3.1 Juta.
*4. CEO Hong Leong Bank* - RM1.2 Juta.
*5. CEO Hartalega* - RM1 Juta.
*6. CEO IOI* - RM1 Juta.
*7. CEO Sapura* - RM1 Juta.

*8.* Gaji Minima Pekerja Swasta B40 - *RM1,500*

*Tapi yg gaji RM1,500 tu lah yg mempertahankan penyamun² dan penyangak² ni bermati²an.*

*Betapa ironi nya Malaysia*
Malaysia 🇲🇾 
Negara Ku Sakit.

Dubai Move -- Hello GPS Where is Sarawak first?

*DUBAI MOVE - HELLO GPS WHERE IS SARAWAK FIRST?*

The Dubai Move which is denied by Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) leaders of such thing happening, is the best opportunity for Sabah and Sarawak to work ways out to take all oil and gas resources back. 

It was said Prime Minister's post (PM) been offered to GPS if they join the DUBAI Team to "topple" Prime Minister ANWAR Ibrahim but it was said GPS under the leadership of Abg Johari declined to accept the offer and prefer to support PMX Anwar Ibrahim. Even if there was no such offer there is nothing wrong to demand Prime Minister Post be given to GPS.

To hold Prime Minister Post is important because with powers in hand, GPS can put many things right such as to increase funds for Sarawak 

If PM Ahmad Badawi could just hand over two blocks of oil areas in Limbang/Lawas to Brunei when he was in office without going through parliament and Sarawak, then if PM is from Sarawak, he can simply do the same to restore all oil and gas resources back to Sabah and Sarawak without going through parliament. He can also get parliament to repeal Petroleum Development Act 1974 ( PDA 74) and also Territorial Seas Act (TSA) and Continental Shelf Act before working ways to set Sarawak and Sabah free and independent from Malaysia if the "marriage" with Malaya is no more good for Sabah and Sarawak

GPS if it wishes to live to its SARAWAK FIRST vision has to evaluate the relationship Sarawak has for the past sixty years with Malaya like what Singapore did in 1965 under Lee Kuan Yew.

 Singapore in 1965 exited from Malaysia because of social, economic and political differences with Malaya could not been resolved.

If PMX Anwar wants support of GPS it's fine but Premier Abg Johari should set conditions including the return of all oil and gas resources and marine wealth and sea territories back to Sarawak and Sabah. He can easily work this out with YAN Chief Minister of Sabah but why GPS didn't take this opportunity? Premier has to be answereable to people of Sarawak of this 

Voon Lee Shan
President 
Parti Bumi Kenyalang
1 January 2024.