大雾散去。。沈振仁

我看，我听，我思 –读后感

大雾散去，梦醒时分，继续装睡或是面对？ 沈振仁

马联邦今天政治局面验证政治真的是什么都有可能的艺术。对呀! 在政治利益考量下，仇家都可以拥抱在一起。马联邦联合政府就是最佳的写照。

马来西亚就是马来亚跟砂国有千海里之遥远，之间肯定没有唇亡齿寒之关系。砂没马联邦肯定明天会更好。可是，马来亚没有砂日子怎么过。

砂政盟自2018年脱离巫统国阵魔掌后成为独立政体成为“造王者”。马来亚今天的乱局是天意和人祸，是巫统国阵从不信正轨正道办理正确的公事。

嗯，人联党在4/6/1959,创党以来初期是以反殖民争取独立为主轴。在70年代加入砂国阵后，就开始大逆转，弄得自己里外不像人，被人民唾弃。

说到砂S4S的崛起来由是在2011年因Najib上任当首相后，担任联合国某职位必须废除内安法令。 砂S4S就大事宣传砂历史和大公开了MA63。

已故Adenan Satem, 在2014年正式上位后，非常支持S4S。之后，砂政盟斗争的大方向，争取砂的自主权变成人联党的救命符。

在1978年，马火箭进驻砂。经过18年经营，在1996年，就有三支火箭射入砂议会。人联党，相对论，走向堕落，给人印象就是为Taib 做帐。

从1996年起经历大起大落。在2021年竞选26席位只险胜2 议席。

对呀，试问砂行动党在砂45年，对砂有何贡献？是有扮演好反对党角色，但对向联邦争取权益，没有一点丁作为。反而，有倒米记录。

停留在空气中承诺不断回响循环，希盟1.0和今天希盟2.0，落实令人厌恶的事项。

人联党创党初期，有着左翼思想，逐渐的越走越右，到左右难分，又一次向右定位。党也有命运共同体，行动党也有人联党的过程，但是，。。。

砂政府争取自主权是势在必行。现今砂政盟也开始努力提升内陆基建措施。砂政府在AbangJo带领下逐渐走上正轨，多项领域也获得多方瞩目。

行动党未来最大的敌人是砂本土反对联盟，目前，是肯雅兰党领先。

谈周的分裂牌和区域牌

谈周长佑的分裂牌和区域牌

周长佑严厉谴责人联“上瘾式”分裂国人各族。（诗华日报4/10/23）

我以一个砂人的立场看周的论点，我真的觉得周长佑很幼稚和神经过敏。

这分明是M4M对冲S4S：马来亚人的马来亚对着干砂拉越人的砂拉越。

人联强调S4S，是天经地义的事。砂人本来就是要以砂国为中心。

马来亚以马来西亚国名义还不是以马来亚区域为中心。庆祝831是最佳的写照。

马联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚区域。周和其他砂火箭队连吭一声都没有。安华首相2023年，联邦拨款砂拉越只有5.6%。这分明就是殖民者的霸权作为。

今天，人联砂政盟的成员坚持争取更公平权益。以砂拉越优先，砂财富属于砂人共有的，有错吗？

马来亚以马来西亚国的名义不间断的掠夺，剥削打压，抢劫霸凌和殖民砂拉越。周怎么如此无感。

砂人联-G P S团队强调砂身份和特点，有错吗？哪里搞分裂？

马来亚的计划是马来亚化洗脑，意图抹掉砂民砂身份和特点。就是去婆罗洲化以马来亚化砂拉越。这周怎么不认为马来亚搞区域牌呢？

周不只幼稚，还中M4M毒太深，所以受不了S4S的人联。

马来亚就是以马来西亚国的身份压缩砂拉越。周却跟马来亚翩翩起舞。

众所周知，周的政治仕途是建立在M4M的基础上，然而S4S却严重摇动其地基。

人联-GPS终极目标是自治权，哪里有空间搞分裂？

砂本土反对党，以肯雅兰党领先，真的是脱马独立为主轴。砂人是以1514号决议决定砂未来。最后，送上SLM的铭言绝句：脱马无罪；独立有理赠送给砂人。

两位主讲者不赞同砂独立

主张 在 大马框架 争取自主权                                          

两主讲者 不赞同砂独立 (诗华日报 2/10/23)

诗巫华团，主办这场演讲主题为【绿潮 冲击下 马来西亚的 政治格局 及 演变】。主讲者是政治领袖邓伦奇和政治学者潘永强。美中不足是没邀请倡导砂独立知名人士好像肯雅兰党的主席温利山，秘书长刘秘秀，或SLM主导Thomas Kiew 或准候选人Josephine Lau. 这样，邓和潘就可以眼界大开知道砂独立后的种种好处。

两位主讲者赞不赞同砂独立根本不重要，因为砂独立不独立是大部分砂人说了算。马来亚人根本没有资格在砂比手画脚，说三道四。

邓，人联元老，谈独立不独立犹豫不决，吞吞吐吐，不能立马下判断。

潘，马来亚人，外人，不赞同砂独立，立场搞笑。讲一大堆废话，如果独立，那么不好，那么，马来亚为什么向英国争取独立呢？ 在知识和认知都不足，没有做足功课下谈砂独立的【弊】，很损自己。

其实，联合国是鼓励有资格独立的国家争取独立。在14/12/1960年，联合国大会通过【去殖民化宣言】中的1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体决定权下耀：一。独立；二。联邦；或 三。合并

争取更大的自治权是人联和砂政盟要在马联邦内的终极目标。本土的反对党，我相信有一天会成立【砂本土反对党联盟】争取的是脱马独立，向新加坡看齐。砂拉越跟马半岛相距千多海里，本来就不是违反自然结合。

说“现有马联邦已经60年，基础也打好。。”，我知道的是马来亚就是以马来西亚联邦的名义，违宪的不间断的掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫，霸凌和殖民砂拉越的基础。

邓说真正独立很辛苦。那么被马来亚殖民，难道不辛苦吗？

说“砂地处 南中国海关键战略地带，列强虎视耽耽，猜不透邻国的想法”。砂独立，如果会有列强的威胁和邻国的入侵，那么联合国，还有存在的价值吗？ 新加坡和文莱，为什么还稳稳当当的生存着？

潘说独立是很贵的，要买飞机，火箭，大炮，要设国防力量等等。Well，砂不独立更贵。每年被马半岛剥夺2，3千亿的税金来开拓砂拉越是绰绰有余的。关于管理国家，处理种族和宗教问题，不必潘担心和操心。咱们肯定不会像马来亚陷入种族和宗教的泥泽中。

说新加坡李光耀含泪离开马联邦，那是一般人的看法。其实，李在他回忆录中有清楚的交代脱马过程。经过密室谈判后，东姑有在两份协议书上签名：分离协议书和独立宣言书。

可惜，潘没机会听听本土在野党和人民论述砂独立后的种种好处。

PBK should contest N67 Jepak by-election

*PBK - PARTI BUMI KENYALANG SHOULD CONTEST THE N67 JEPAK BY-ELECTION IN BINTULU.* 

The politics of Malaya and Sarawak from the time the Federation of Malaysia has not brought any significant progress and developments to Sarawak, especially to the vast rural areas. The citizens are still living in poverty and lack the basic infrastructure and amenities. This has been a period of 60 years. Are the people of Sarawak going to remain the same for 100 years?

For as long as we are governed by the present ruling regime in cahoot with Malaya, Sarawak and its people will never see any better developments. One political scientist has emphasised that Sarawak is 100 years behind in developments compared to Malaya. This shows the terrible lack of fiduciary duty to Sarawak. So why should Sarawak remain in the Federation of Malaysia? In the future to come Sarawak will be an independent nation, so why should we wait. Now is the time. Sarawak people are more than capable of governing the country much better. We could have much better roads all over Sarawak by now. But look at the conditions of roads in rural Sarawak. Sarawak people should not be too naive about the conditions of developments in Sarawak. The Pan-Borneo Highway should be Four-Lanes on either side to call it a highway. 

Sarawak should demand self-determination. We have enough of the hegemony of Malaya and GPS Sarawak. The struggle, as charted by PBK for Sarawak to be independent, is the only choice for Sarawak to become a great nation and country.

For the by-election for Jepak, PBK should contest the election. The struggle for Sarawak independence should be prompted wherever possible and in whatever opportunity. The people of Sarawak must and should start to advocate for Sarawak Independence. PBK is the one and only political party that advocates and fights for Sarawak Independence. 

The people of Sarawak must now wake up to see the future of Sarawak as an independent nation. Sarawak should have been a much more developed country if we had been independent. Look at how Singapore left the Federation of Malaysia in 1965, which is now a developed nation. 

Being in the Federation of Malaysia has actually made Sarawak to be a colony of Malaya. 

The people of Sarawak must support PBK so that Sarawak can go for self-determination and independent state.

Prof Dr. Richard Ibuh

Vice President

Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Was Malaysia formed by way of fraud?

*WAS MALAYSIA FORMED BY WAY OF FRAUD?*

In rural areas, not many have yet ever heard about MA63 and even in towns and cities in Sabah and Sarawak, many people never heard about MA63.

Legal opinions in UN Secretariat 

clearly mentioned that Malaysia is not a new nation but a nation with a change of name to Malaysia. This means Malaysia is Malaya and Malaya is Malaysia. UN secretariat legal opinions are also of the opinion that SSS were gifted by UK to enlarge Malaya. Tunku in a book titled Conversation with Tunku Abdul Rahman at page 86 also mentioned Singapore Sabah and Sarawak were a gift to Malaya and Tunku also wrote a letter of thanks to the Queen for the gift.

 Therefore, it was a fraud because there was no referendum at that time for people of Sabah and Sarawak to decide for themselves whether or not they wish to join Malaya to create Malaysia.

UK and Malaya cleverly overcome the need of a referendum to settle this issue by circumventing United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 of right of colonized countries for self determination by way of assessment of 4000 odd Sabahans and Sarawakians by the Cobbold Commission and came with a doctored report to say peoples of Sabah and Sarawak wanted Malaysia. How could these 4000 odds could represent the voice of 1.3 million Borneo people at that time? 

Please read the book by Prof Michael Leigh the demands by Tunku that Cobbold Commission Report must show that peoples of Borneo Territories wanted Malaysia.None of the members of Cobbold Commission could speak and understand the native languages of Sabah and Sarawak and most of our people were illiterate and could not at that time understand English. They could not understand the purpose of the Cobbold Commission which came with a report within weeks only. How could they able to travel the length and breadth of Sabah and Sarawak to find the true wishes of the people?

There are evidence in our hands that those who disagree with MALAYSIA were arrested and tortured and branded as terrorists and communists. They had to save their lives and hid themselves in the jungle and took arms to defend themselves. To take arms to defend yourself against being killed is legal under domestic and international law. 

Sokarneo and the Philippines were against MALAYSIA and this caused the border wars in 1960s which also led to peace settlement by signing the Manila Accord with a promise by Malaya to hold a referendum but until now this was not fulfilled.

Records also showed that officials from the United Nations were "handpicked" to agree with the Cobbold Commission Report. A guy was said known could be bribed.

When fraud was involved in the creation of Malaysia, we could not allow the dead child Malaysia be revived. In law, the law could not help any fraud.

Although in the federal constitution etc it mentioned that Sabah and Sarawak are federated with Malaya or helped formed Malaysia, but in reality, politically Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. 

Malaya controls parliament and the federal cabinet and controls the state government by proxies in past 60 years. Malaya also have political parties from Malaya like PKR, PAS, Bersatu, DAP, MUDA fighting for seats in Sabah and Sarawak. Seats won by them are seats taken away from Sabah and Sarawak. 

Sabah and Sarawak are only given 56 out of 222 MP seats. 

At the moment, not many could be bothered to say MA63 is a fraud or that Sabah and Sarawak are colonies of Malaya. At the same time, not many feel the pain of loss of marine wealth, oil and gas and natural resources being taken by Malaya because things are not from their pockets.

Under international law, colonizers have the legal right to impose their wills on their colonies including their religion and imposing their culture, language and administration on the colonised. This gave rise to slavery by colonisers against the colonized. Please see Africa until now.

PBK has no means at the moment to set the matter straight due to lack of support, manpower and fund. It is the people's power that is important in politics. I personally believe time will come people will seek justice in the streets and there will be a peaceful revolution against MALAYSIA or the federal government. We have seen this in many African countries and even in the Philippines, Indonesia and Thailand had "tasted" street revolution.

 You couldn't seek justice in many matters in Malaysian Court and I had discussed this with an eminent foreign law professor and a foreign judge.

Voon Lee Shan 

President Parti Bumi Kenyalang

司法独立

保障民众权利应修法完善司法独立---古威星

司法独立纯粹是为了保护个人和社区司法独立得到保障。让公众获得公平审判。法官公正不阿依法处理案件。

古威星是砂律师公会主席在13/1/2023,沙砂司法年席开幕致辞时如此表示。

说实施司法独立，同时也必须保护法官。法官授予决策权是为保护公众对司法机构的信心。

为了实现更完善司法独立，律师公会认为，有必要修改2009年司法任命委员会法令和联邦宪法，确保各机构：立法；司法，行政，辩护人之间的明确权力。

有必要修改2009年司法任命权的第27条文，以消除首相赋予委任4名最高法官，联邦和上诉庭法官的权力。

还有，联邦宪法第122B条文取消首相向国家元首任命联邦法院，上诉庭和高等法官提出建议的特权。

还有，还有，就是修订2009年委员会法令第5（1）（f）条文,修订首相持有委任4名知名人士担任司法官和委任9名成员组成的委员会的特权。

取而代之，应该是委任利益相关者，其中包括马联邦各个律师公会和律师。我认为NGOs也可以加入组成这委员会。

同时，当然，公民有必要知道自己本身的权益和义务，才有机会伸展正义。

改进就要从总检察长办公室开始。该办公室有必要在网上公布所有相关法律，以方便人民轻松查阅。

公平选区拨款---蓝志锋

公平选区拨款---蓝志锋

希盟的［竞选宣言］---朝野公平拨款。现在，安华首相却要求在野党必须坐下来跟政府谈一谈，否则，连门都没。

不管是执政或在野区，人民都是纳税人，怎么可以玩起大小眼。那是过往9任首相的放纵玩法。他们的宣言本来就没有这么承诺。

然而，所谓的昌明政府希盟的宣言就这么明确的说明。现在，要玩不昌明做法，谁不火大？

是的，自称昌明政府在Zahid 的DNAA法定有罪的撤销他47贪污罪案后，其实是元气大伤。

竞选宣言是朝野公平拨款到现在犹豫不决。不遵循承诺会是另一致命伤。

是的，安华有顾虑，怕拨款或被滥用来攻击希盟。

其实，公正党以公正标榜，领头羊安华必须走正道对抗歪门邪道。

非常认同蓝的看法，以改革定位的希盟应该建议公正公平游戏规则。往后，不管自家是在位或下野，保证政治生态环境是良善的。

民主进程是往更好的大方向发展。有公正公平游戏规则可以让严重脱轨的马联邦政治重新上进步，发展和繁荣的规格。

有NGOs和全民看管朝野拨款用途，拨款哪里会被滥用？

沙砂已经被拉下水60+年，不管怎样，我还是我，认为脱马独立是沙砂最佳的选择。