Pages

Powered By Blogger

Wednesday, 15 March 2023

18 点

砂拉越18点備忘錄

 第 1 点:宗教 
虽然没有人反对伊斯兰教是马来亚的国教,但应该 婆罗洲没有国教(砂拉越和沙巴),以及与伊斯兰教有关的规定 马来亚现行宪法不应适用于婆罗洲。

 第 2 点:语言 
a. 马来语应该是联邦的国语 * b. 马来西亚日之后10年内应继续使用英语 * 
C. 英语应该是婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的官方语言, 州或联邦,适用于所有目的,不受时间限制。 
第 3 点:宪法 
在接受马来亚联邦现行宪法成 為马来西亚宪法的基础,马来西亚宪法应该是一个全新的 ,根据国家自由联盟起草和商定的文件,而不应成为 各州起草并同意在不同的情況之下一系列宪法修正案 。婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的新宪法当然是 絕對必要的。 

第 4 点:联邦元首
婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的国家元首不应有资格推选為联邦元首。

第 5 点:联邦名称 “马来西亚”而不是“大马来亚” 。

第 6 点:移民 
控制从外部进入马来西亚任何地区的移民应由中央政府控制 , 但进入婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)也需要获得州政府的批准 。除非出于严格的安全考量理由,联邦政府不应否决因于州政府目的而进入婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)之人員。除了联邦政府從砂拉越沙巴及其他地区雇請之人員之外,砂拉越沙巴应該不受限制地控制其他人員出入。

第 7 点:分离权 
不应有脱离联邦的权利 。

第 8 点:婆罗洲化 
公共服务的婆罗洲化应尽快进行。

 第 9 点:英国军官 /官員
应尽一切努力鼓励英国军官继续从事公共服务,直到 他们的位置可以由来自婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的合格人员代替。

 第 10 点:公民身份 Cobbold 委员会报告第 148(k)段中的建议应 管理婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的公民权利,但须遵守 以下修正: * a) (i) 项不应包含关于五年居住的條文。
 * b) 为配合我们的法律,第 (ii)(a) 项应改为“10 年中有 7 年” 而不是“10 年中有 8 年” * c) (iii) 项不应包含与父母公民身份相关的任何限制—在马来西亚之后出生在婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的人必须是联邦公民。 

第 11 点:关税和金融 婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)应保留对自身财务、发展和关税的控制权, 并应有权自行征税和以自己的信用筹集贷款。

 第十二点:土著种族的特殊地位原则上,婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的土著种族应享有特殊权利 类似于马来亚马来人所享受的那些,但现在马来人在这方面的权利不一定适用于婆罗洲(砂拉越和巴)。

第 13 点:州政府 
* a) 首相应由非官职的立法会议员选举产生 * b) 婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)应该有适当的部长制度 。

第 14 点:过渡期 
这应该是七年,在此期间应由宪法賦予婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)州政府立法权,而不仅仅是联邦政府授权给 州政府。

第 15 点:教育 
婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)现有的教育体系应该得到维护 ,因此它应该在其控制之下 。

第 16 点:宪法保障 在沒有得到婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)政府积极同意之下,不得修改或撤销授予婆罗洲的任何特殊保障 。

修改婆罗洲邦(砂拉越和沙巴)宪法的权力应该 完全属于其人民。 (注:统一党、民主党 Pasok Momogun 党认为需要四分之三多数 才有效对联邦和邦宪法的任何修正案,而 UNKO 和 USNO 认为三分之二多数就足够了)。

 第 17 点:在联邦议会中的代表 
这不仅应考虑到婆罗洲(砂拉越和沙巴)的人口,还应考虑到 它的版圖和潜力,无论如何都不应低于新加坡代表之人數。

 第 18 点:国家元首名称 国家元首 。

Wednesday, 8 March 2023

把722当做独立日是误导人

肯雅兰全民党主席温利山
2023年3月8日

你不能把 722 等同于独立,因为法律是明确的。只有英国议会通过的议会独立法案才能允许英国殖民地获得独立。这是為何1963年8月31日李光耀宣布新加坡独立时,当时的殖民地大臣说李光耀宣布新加坡独立是无效的。

 1963年 8 月 31 日本來是马来西亚成立的日子,但由于当时的政治环境,马来西亚于 1963 年 9 月 16 日宣布成立。

1957年 8 月 31 日,英国根据英国议会通过的《马来亚独立法》授予马来亚独立。

被称为最高委员会的宁甘内阁不是他选出的,而是由英国总督任命的,内阁中有外籍人士如 PEH Pike,殖民地总检察长坐鎮。如果我记得的话,殖民地财政大臣(我一時忘记了他的名字)也在第一次參加了内阁会议。

英国总督主持了第一次内阁会议,在会议期间他表现出对谁将接替他担任总督而担忧。 Jugah 有意成为州长,但这对屬意于马来人的马来亚来说是不可接受的。砂拉越差一点从巫统那里派來一位來自柔佛的马来亚人来担任砂拉越州长, 但后来由 Tun Openg 被任命为州长。

最高理事会成立时,英国总督甚至没有使用任何术语或将722称为砂拉越的“自治”或“独立”。

 这位总督在 1963 年 9 月 16 日下午离开阿斯塔纳前往新加坡之前,仍然掌握着很大的控制权。若我记忆正确, 从媒体上读到的是总理阿邦佐说他記得1963年9日16日下午其父母和全家人在英国总督离開元首府之后才入住的。

以免公眾受误会, Sim教授可能需要阅读Michael Leigh教授的书籍和AJ Stockwell教授的研究工作以及其他相关书籍、新闻文章和解密文件。

各位读者,请不要认为事情是理所当然的,把政客和公众人物说的话当成正确的。如果我们相信来自我们的政治家和领导人之錯誤言論為正确的,而不通过我们自己的阅读和研究来确认或认清真相,那么我们也会误导他人。

如果不加以纠正,领导者的错误信息和谎言可能会长期留存而误导他人。

You cannot equate 722 with independence because the law is clear. Independence by Britain of her colonies could only be allowed by an Independence Act of Parliament passed by UK PARLIAMENT. This was what the then Secretary of Colonies said when LKY declared Singapore independence on 31 August 1963 which the Secretary of Colonies said the declaration of independence of Singapore by LKY was invalid.

 31 August 1963 was the day that was chosen to have Malaysia formed but due to political circumstances at that moment, Malaysia was declared formed on 16 September 1963.

Malaya was granted independence on 31 August 1963 by UK by Malaya Independence Act passed by UK Parliament. 


The Ningkan Cabinet called Supreme Council was not picked by Ningkan but by the British governor with expatriates in the Cabinet. PEH Pike, the Colonial Attorney General sat in the Cabinet. If I could recall the Colonial Treasury Secretary ( I forgot his name) also sat in the Cabinet on 1st Cabinet Meeting. 

The British governor chaired the first Cabinet meeting and during the meeting he showed concern who would take over from him as a governor. Jugah aimed to be governor but, this was not acceptable to Malaya who preferred a Malay. Sarawak nearly got a Malaya from UMNO to be Sarawak governor. He was from Johore but later Tun Openg was made governor.

The British governor didn't even use any term or refer 722 as "self-government" or "independence" for Sarawak when the Supreme Council was formed. 

 The governor was still very much in control until he left the Astana on the afternoon of 16 September 1963 to Singapore. What I could recall correctly from reading in the press, Premier Abg Johari said his parents and all in the family entered the Astana after the British governor no more occupy the Astana. He recalled it was in the afternoon 16 September 1963.

Prof. Sim may need to read books by Prof Michael Leigh and the research work of Prof. AJ Stockwell and other relevant books, press articles and declassified documents so that the public would not get things wrong  

To readers, please do not take things for granted and take what comes from the mouths of politicians and public figures as correct. If we believe what that comes from our politicians and leaders as correct when they were wrong without doing our own reading and research to confirm or find the truth, we can mislead others too.

A wrong message by a leader could leave a long lasting lie or wrong information if not corrected. 

Voon Lee Shan 
President Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Tuesday, 28 February 2023

Why didn't they do so?

Tun Jugah and Ningkan could have pulled out not to be in Malaysia but why they didn't? Had both of them decided not to have Sarawak formed Malaysia, Sarawak is now an independent nation and could be like Dubai. Now with oil and gas taken by Malaya and revenues taken from Sarawak to develop MALAYA instead of Sarawak and dayak land, why should Dayaks complain? You know this land belong to you but if you don't want it others will take it. 

 SUPP was fighting hard not wanting MALAYSIA be formed. They even petitioned to UN. Many of them about 6, 000 were harassed, arrested and jailed without trial for years. 

 Many went into the jungle, took arms to become terrorists. Of course some dayaks also were with them. Dayaks hated them because they were terrorists. This was the game played by foreigners and victors.

CM Ningkan was trapped and when he fought back the foreigners kicked him out!

Jugah wanted to be Governor and it was part of the negotiations before Malaysia. 
For this reason he supported Malaysia. Sarawak nearly got a Governor from UMNO but Jugah outwitted by foreigners had to settle as a federal minister yet with no office in KL. Jugah led YBs in DUN to have Ningkan sacked. We could not blame them because both didn't have good advisers at their side and were played out by foreigners. 

 Please see books by Prof Michael Leigh. 

After Malaysia was formed SUPP preferred to play kingmaker. This is natural 
because they struggled but they could not get what they wanted.    

I would see SUPP, a party dominated by Chinese will not ever support and dayak to fight PBB or pull down PBB led government. They're comfortable with PBB Bumiputera Wing and PBB Pesaka Wing. There are many dayak tycoons in GPS and they live comfortably in towns and cities. I wonder how often they went back to their longhouses to see for themselves the conditions of own people in the longhouses. Despite being filthy rich, I have yet heard any of them have built a kindergarten in longhouses to help children in longhouses with their studies.

A sad thing is that dayaks also threw away PBDS in last elections. We had strategized all things with Bobby William and other dayak leaders who believe enough is enough. But PBK led by me was branded as party cina. We were destroyed when people played race card and all our dayak in PBDS and PBK candidates lost badly. PBDS was blamed for bergaul with Cina during campaign. 

PBDS under Bobby knew we have to work together. We have to be realistic because race politics is bad for Sarawak. Race politics was engineered to sow discontent and we want peace in Sarawak. 

We hope to get at least a few seats for local opposition parties but just for a few ringgit beer and merry making people put BN/GPS in the government again. Don't complain because they are elected by people and the dayaks supported them. 

 Dayak seats are many and combined with Malay seats, GPS found it very easy to be returned to power for some chicken wings and beer to make people happy in rural areas. 

In towns, some donations for Chinese schools and associations were enough to get them back into power. 

Why should Chinese be bothered with people in the rural areas? After all they don't use the muddy roads and dangerous rivers that the rural folks felt "comfortable"  

Sarawak people wanted BN/GPS to lead Sarawak for another five years and dayaks and Chinese should be please with them by allowing the current condition to persist. 
 
Don't complain if the NCR land be taken by Malayan companies or by the Chinese tycoons because we asked for it. We have lost our oil and gas too. Why complain? 

Chinese tycoons cari makan and were willing to give people with a few tins of beers to help dayak candidates from PBB and GPS be elected to allow PBB led GPS to rule Sarawak for another five years. Lawyers also love NCR land be taken by Chinese tycoons and companies from Malaya because Lawyers whether they're politicians or not make money out of the disputes about NCR land. Worse still if they were allowed to negotiate behind the back by NCR landowners. Dayaks NCR land owners get peanuts from the settlement while Lawyers make money and laugh to the bank.

 Dayaks should wake up and turn the tables! Tell your people we need to change the government or even find ways to peacefully exit from the federation like Singapore did.

Monday, 27 February 2023

Discrimination

Demi ugama, bangsa dan negara... 🤗 6 decades of oppression, suppression and discrimination has got to stop in order to build a new Malaysia. Read with a clear mind and a forgiving heart. 

Impressive HISTORICAL record of the corruption in Malaysia!

Dato Shahruddin Ali: 

I am 60 years old, I have seen during Tungku Abdul Rahman times, we had one of the best Government servant, one of the best police officers, one of the best military officers, its because we had multi racial workforce in all Government sector. Why is it BN government remove non muslim and "Operasi isi Penuh"( Fill in full) muslim population in all government Departments ? During Tunku Abdul Rahman we didnt come across a single mosque or surau in all government department or military or police department, we didnt come across any corruptions. WHY WITH ALL MOSQUE, SURAU, UNIVERSITY ISLAM AND UITM , we are facing one of the worse corruption scandals in the world today.  
LIST OF CORRUPTION IN MALAYSIA :
1. PKFZ RM12 billion
2. Submarine Commission RM500 million
3. Sime Darby RM964 million
4. Paya Indah Westland RM88 million
5. Pos Malaysia (Transmile) RM230 million lost
6. Eurocopter deal RM1 billion wasted
7. Terengganu Stadium collapse RM292 million
8. MRR2 repair cost RM70 million
9. Maybank overpaid BII RM4 billion
10. Tourism - NYY kickback RM10 million
11. 3 paintings bought by MAS RM1.5 million
12. Overpayment by Sport Ministry RM8.4 million
13. London’s white elephant sports complex RM70 million
14. MATRADE repairs RM120 million
15. Cost of new plane used by PM RM200 million
16. InventQ irrecoverable debt RM228 million
17. Compensation for killing crooked bridge RM257 million
18. Loss in selling Augusta RM 510 million
19. Worth of APs given out in a year RM1.8 billion
20. Submarines (future Muzium Negara artifacts) RM4.1 billion
21. PSC Naval dockyard RM6.75 billion
22. The Bank Bumiputra twin scandals in the early 1980s saw US$1 billion losses (RM3.2 billion in 2008)
23. The Maminco attempt to corner the World Tin Market in the 1980s is believed to have cost some US$500 million (RM1.6 billion)
24. Betting in foreign exchange futures cost Bank Negara Malaysia RM30 billion in the 1990s
25. Perwaja Steel’s US$800 million (RM2.56 billion) losses
26. Use of RM10 billion public funds in the Valuecap Sdn Bhd operation to shore up the stock market
27. Banking scandal of RM700 million losses in Bank Islam
28. The sale of M.V. Agusta by Proton for one Euro making a loss of €75.99 million (RM348 million) Same as No.20?
29. Wang Ehsan from oil royalty on Terengganu RM7.4 billion from 2004 – 2007
30. For the past 10 years since Philharmonic Orchestra
was established, this orchestra has swallowed a total of RM500 million. Hiring a Kwai-Lo CEO with a salary of more than RM1 million per annum!
31. In Advisors Fees, Mahathir was paid RM180,000, Shahrizat Abdul RM404,726 and Abdul Hamid Othman (religious) RM549,675 per annum
32. The government has spent a total of RM3.2 billion in teaching Maths and Science in English over the past five years. Of the amount, the government paid a whopping RM2.21 billion for the purchase of information and computer technology (ICT) equipment which it is unable to give a breakdown. Government paid more than RM6,000 per notebook vs per market price of less than RM3,000 through some new consortiums that was setup just to transact the notebook deal. There was no Maths & Science Content for the teachers and the notebooks are all with the teachers' children now.
33. The commission paid for purchase of jets and submarines to two private companies - Perimeker Sdn Bhd and IMT Defence Sdn Bhd amounted to RM910 million. Expanding on No. 2?
37. RM300 million to compensate Gerbang Perdana for the RM1.1 billion "Crooked Scenic Half-Bridge"
38. RM1.3 billion has been wasted building the white elephant Customs, Immigration and Quarantine (CIQ) facilities on cancellation of the Malaysia-Singapore Scenic Bridge
39. RM100 million on renovation of Parliament building which leaks
40. National Astronaut (actually tourist) Programme – RM40 million
41. National Service Training Programme – yearly an estimate of RM 500 million
42. Eye of Malaysia - RM30 million and another RM5.7 million of free tickets
43. RM2.4 million on indelible ink
44. Samy Vellu announced in September 2006 that the government paid compensation amounting to RM38.5 billion to 20 highway companies. RM380 million windfalls for 9 toll concessionaires earned solely from the toll hike in 2008 alone
45. RM32 million timber export kickbacks involving companies connected to Sarawak Chief Minister and his family.
46. Two bailouts of Malaysia Airline System RM7.9 billion. At a time when MAS is incurring losses every year, RM1.55 million used to buy three paintings to decorate its Chairman’s (Munir) office. Expanding on No.11
47. Putra transport system bailout which cost RM4.486 billion.
48. STAR-LRT bailout costing RM3.256 billion.
49. National Sewerage System bailout costing RM192.54 million.
50. Seremban-Port Dickson Highway bailout costing RM142 million
51. Kuching Prison bailout costing RM135 million
52. Kajian Makanan dan Gunaan Orang Islam bailout costing RM8.3 million
53. Le Tour de Langkawi bailout costing RM3.5 Million
54. Wholesale distribution of tens of millions of shares in Bursa Malaysia under the guise of NEP to cronies, children and relatives of BN leaders and ministers worth billions of ringgit.
55. Alienation of tens of thousands of hectares of commercial lands and forestry concessions to children and relatives of BN leaders and Ministers worth tens of billions of ringgits.
56. Since 1997, Petronas has handed out a staggering RM30 billion in natural gas subsidies to IPPs who were reaping huge profits. In addition, there were much wastages and forward trading of Petronas oil in the 1990s based on the low price of oil then. Since the accounts of Petronas are for the eyes of the Prime Minister only, we have absolutely no idea of the amount.
57. RM5,700 for a car jack worth only RM50
58. Government-owned vehicle consumed a tank of petrol worth RM113 within a few minutes
59 A pole platform that cost RM990 was bought for RM30,000
60. A thumb drive that cost RM90 was bought for RM480
61. A cabinet that cost RM1,500 was bought for RM13,500
62. A flashlight that cost RM35 was bought for RM143
63. Expenses for 1Malaysia campaign paid to APCO?
64. RM17 billion subsidy to IPP
65. US$24 million Diamond Ring for Ro$mah - Cancellation of Order - how much compensation ?
66. CowGate . . . RM250 Million
67. Monsoon Cup . . . RM800 million per year
68. Illicit Fund Transfers out of Malaysia ( 2000 - 2009) : RM 1,077,000,000,000!
69. Tajudin-Danaharta settlement to cover up for Dr M and Daim
70. Billions of ringgit toll concessions that disadvantage the government and taxpayers”
71. With 1MDB 42 billion dollars missing .
72. MAIKA SHARE 120,000,000 SHARES IN TELEKOM
73. ABU SYAYAP TERRORIST 12 MILLION DOLLARS.

I am 60 years old. NEP suppose to end in 1999. Now NEP being use as an excuse to implement Islamic values in all over schools, Universities, Police Departments, Government Departments. WHY INDIANS TREATED LIKE GANGSTERS BY PM AND DEPUTY PM? WHY ITS ALWAYS NON MUSLIMS ARE BRANDED AS KAIFR( JAHIL - LOW CLASS HUMANS) Malaysia is possibly the most racist country in the world with the following segregation. Have a look and judge for yourself.
List of racial discrimination in Malaysia:
(1) Of the five major banks, only one is multi-racial, the rest are controlled by Malays.
(2) 99% of Petronas directors are Malays.
(3) 3% of Petronas employees are Chinese.
(4) 99% of 2000 Petronas gasoline stations are owned by Malays.
(5) 100% all contractors working under Petronas projects must be of Bumis status.
(6) 0% of non-Malay staff are legally required in Malay companies. But there must be 30% Malay staffs in Chinese companies.
(7) 5% of all new intake for government police, nurses, army, are non-Malays.
(8) 2% is the present Chinese staff in Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF), a drop from 40% in 1960.
(9) 2% is the percentage of non-Malay government servants in Putrajaya, but Malays make up 98%.
(10) 7% is the percentage of Chinese government servants in the entire government (in 2004); a drop from 30% in 1960.
(11) 95% of government contracts are given to Malays.
(12) 100% all business licensees are controlled by Malay government, e.g. Taxi permits, Approved permits, etc.
(13) 80% of the Chinese rice millers in Kedah had to be sold to Malay controlled Bernas in 1980s. Otherwise, life is made difficult for Chinese rice millers.
(14) 100 big companies set up, owned and managed by Chinese Malaysians were taken over by government, and later managed by Malays since 1970s, e.g. UTC, UMBC, MISC, etc.
(15) At least 10 Chinese owned bus companies (throughout Malaysia in the past 40 years) had to be sold to MARA or other Malay transport companies due to rejection by Malay authorities to Chinese applications for bus routes and rejection for their applications for new buses.
(16) Two Chinese taxi drivers were barred from driving in Johor Larkin bus station. There are about 30 taxi drivers and three were Chinese in Oct. 2004. Spoiling taxi club properties was the reason given.
(17) 0 non-Malays are allowed to get shop lots in the new Muar bus station (Nov. 2004).
(18) 8000 billion ringgit is the total amount the government channeled to Malay pockets through ASB, ASN, MARA, privatization of government agencies, Tabung Haji etc, through NEP over a 34 years period.
(19) 48 Chinese primary schools closed down from 1968 - 2000.
(20) 144 Indian primary schools closed down from 1968 - 2000.
(21) 2637 Malay primary schools built from 1968 - 2000.
(22) 2.5% is government budget for Chinese primary schools. Indian schools got only 1%, Malay schools got 96.5%.
(23) While a Chinese parent with RM1000 salary (monthly) cannot get school textbook loan, a Malay parent with RM2000 salary is eligible.
(24) All 10 public university vice chancellors are Malays.
(25) 5% of the government universities' lecturers are of non-Malay origins. This percentage has been reduced from about 70% in 1965 to only 5% in 2004.
(26) Only 5% has been given to non-Malays for government scholarships in over 40 years.
(27) 0 Chinese or Indians were sent to Japan and Korea under the "Look East Policy."
(28) 128 STPM Chinese top students could not get into the course to which they aspired, i.e. Medicine (in 2004).
(29) 10% quotas are in place for non-Bumi students for MARA science schools beginning in 2003, but only 7% are filled. Before that it was 100% Malays.
(30) 50 cases in which Chinese and Indian Malaysians are beaten up in the National Service program in 2003.
(31) 25% of the Malaysian population was Chinese in 2004, a drop from 45% in 1957.
(32) 7% of the Malaysian population is Indian (2004), a drop from 12% in 1957.
(33) 2 million Chinese Malaysians have emigrated in the past 40 years.
(34) 0.5 million Indian Malaysians have emigrated overseas.
(35) 3 millions Indonesians have migrated to Malaysia and become Malaysian citizens with Bumis status.
(36) 600,000 Chinese and Indian Malaysians with red IC were rejected repeatedly when applying for citizenship in the past 40 years. Perhaps 60% of them had already passed away due to old age. This shows racism, based on how easily Indonesians got their citizenships compared with the Chinese and Indians.
(37) 5% - 15% discount for a Malay to buy a house. I AM 60 YEARS OLD, I LOST MY TRUST IN ALL OUR MUSLIM LEADERS

[21/01, 14:49] Dato Shahruddin Ali

👍✌I have seen these details previously which is very painful for non malays to read and digest To me these details are truthful and I am proud of the persons who complled all these facts.Hopefully more malays should read this contents to realise it is their own kind who is cheating them the most

Sunday, 26 February 2023

我们在MA63上的立场

*我们在 MA63 上的立场* 


亲爱的同胞们:

 我在 2019 年 6 月概述了我党的方向,并多次重申,PBK 将寻求通过法律途径让砂拉越从马来西亚联邦手中获得自由和独立,因为这是二战后联合国想要的。 英国是联合国第1514号决议的签署国,应受其约束。 就法律和政治意义而言,现在,砂拉越确实是马来亚的殖民地。 在我接受调查时向警方的陈述中,我也向他们提到了我的立场以及我对法律的了解。 至今,联邦政府悄无声息。

 在沙巴、砂拉越和新加坡 (SSS) 被诱使成立马来西亚后,马来亚改名为马来西亚。 这记录在联合国记录中。 马来西亚唱着马来亚的 Negaraku,飞着马来亚的 Jalur Gemilang,只有额外加多的条纹。 我们的州长必须由阿贡任命。 我们不是马来亚的殖民地吗?
 
 根据国际法,宁甘在马来西亚日宣布砂拉越独立是不正确的。 Ningkan 不是律师,宣布砂拉越在马来西亚内独立是不明智的。 那都是英国人和马来亚人策划的。 根据国际法,任何国家都不能在另一个国家内独立。 东姑阿都拉曼在一本书《与东姑阿都拉曼的对话》中承认,砂拉越、沙巴和新加坡是英国人送给马来亚的礼物。 宁甘希望马来西亚成立,因为他想成为首席部长。 Jugah 也是如此,因为他认为他可以成为砂拉越州长,但当他没有被任命为州长,他当了在吉隆坡没有办公室的联邦不管部长。 他怎么可能在吉隆坡没有任何职位? 贪婪和背叛是我对他们两个的回答。 宁甘被封为首席部长后,意识到不对劲而造反。 然后他被解雇了。
 
 说PBK会让人们相信砂拉越是马来西亚联邦中的一个独立州属,这是错误的。 在我的领导下,PBK 永远不会放弃砂拉越确实是一个殖民地的立场,或者至少没有被英国授予独立。 要获得独立,必须由英国议会通过议会法案。 这是英国殖民地大臣说的,马来亚就是这样独立的。 我已经向警察清楚地解释了这一点。

说PBK不应该声称MA63无效也不是我们可以妥协的。 这是因为根据国际法,MA63确实是无效的。 我在被捕时也向警方表达了我对这件事的看法。

 国际法律对我来说很清楚,MA63 是无效的,因为殖民地没有法律能力与任何母国达成协议,因为它是一项条约。 国际法院2019年2月25日宣判的查戈斯群岛案就说明了这一点。 全世界有不少于 150 名著名的法律专家和法学家在查戈斯群岛案中工作。 联邦政府和砂拉越政府现在承受着巨大的压力,他们试图履行 MA63 中的所有条款和条件,就好像 MA63 是一项有效条约一样。

 PBK 让他们看起来很愚蠢。

 他们试图把脱脂棉拉到我们眼前。 只要马来亚掌权,MA63 就无法保障砂拉越的权利。 联邦政府可以随时收回、废除或撤销承诺给我们的任何东西。 马来亚控制着联邦内阁和议会,他们没有可能让既得位给它的殖民地。

 过去几年有太多关于恢复 MA63 条款的政治声明,但在我于 2019 年 6 月介入,并明确表示 PBK 正在推动砂拉越独立之前,没有实质性的行动。

 722 不是砂拉越独立日。 同意722是独立日,这一点会使我们成为傻瓜,因为这在法律上是错误的。 722 是一部政治骗剧,迫使已故的阿德南同意。 阿德南(Adenan)聪明地利用这一点,因而他的政治里程赢得了选举。 7 月 22 日是英国国旗降下的日子,但英国总督仍然在这里,并仍在控制之中。 这是英国人精心策划的,目的是给砂拉越人和世界留下砂拉越获得独立的印象。 英国驻砂拉越总督于1963年9月16日下午才乘游艇启航前往新加坡。 Tun Openg 于下午 4 点左右才进入阿斯塔纳。 如果我记得的话没错,这是总理阿邦佐哈里所说的。

 正如我在上面所说,要给予独立,英国议会必须通过给予砂拉越独立的法案,但直到现在,英国议会从未通过任何砂拉越独立法案。
 
 Ningkan 是由英国总督任命为 CM,而 Ningkan 并非由砂拉越人民选举为 CM。 如果当时英国总督愿意,他有权任命任何人担任总督,不一定是宁甘。 因此,这表明英国人仍处于控制之中。 如果我还记得我读过的内容,英国总督主持了第一次最高理事会会议(第一届砂拉越内阁),那是一个星期六。 总督在会上表达了他对谁将接替他的位置的担忧。 事实上,砂拉越差点让一名来自柔佛州的巫统人出任砂拉越州长。 后来妥协了。 然后,Tun Openg 取代了 Jugah,成为了州长。

PBK 的信息尚未传达给所有人民。 这是因为该政权正在尽其所能确保人民不会听到 PBK 的声音。 目前,我可以说不超过百分之一的砂拉越人知道自决权、海洋生物的损失以及我们的石油和天然气资源的损失,据推测每年约有 1000 亿令吉被联邦政府拿去用。 我们得到的回报总是少少的那么一点。 我们不是殖民地吗?

 1963 年 9 月 16 日马来西亚日之后出生的人,很少有人知道马来西亚是如何形成的,也不知道砂拉越是在此之前的一个国家,并被马来亚吞并,扩大马来亚领土,改名为马来西亚。

 由于害怕当权者骚扰,PBK 可能会失去支持者,但他们能让我们闭嘴多久? 现在更多人知道马来西亚砂拉越的情况。 事情会爆发为一场和平革命,将砂拉越赶出马来西亚,这只是时间问题。 国内和国际法允许和平革命,当砂拉越人知道他们的权利并站在一起反对马来亚和现任砂拉越政府的统治时,和平革命就会发生。

 和平革命意味着走上街头,以和平抗议的方式寻求政权和世界的关注。

 BERSIH 做到了这一点,这导致马来西亚国阵政府在统治马来西亚 50 多年后发生了变化。

 温利山
 2023 年 2 月 25 日

Saturday, 25 February 2023

Why was there a confrontation with Indonesia?

*温利山: Why there was* *a confrontation with Indonesia?* 
( 2022-09-22 )

 *为什么与印度尼西亚发生冲突?* 

 大多数砂拉越人不明白近六十年前,为什么与印度尼西亚发生对抗,这导致担心如果砂拉越独立,会与邻国发生另一场战争。

 印度尼西亚-马来西亚对抗或婆罗洲对抗(也以其印度尼西亚/马来语名称 Konfrontasi 着称)是 1963 年至 1966 年的武装冲突,源于印度尼西亚反对建立马来西亚联邦。

 1966 年印度尼西亚总统苏加诺被罢免后,争端和平结束,马来西亚成立。 之所以发生对抗,是因为苏加诺说马来西亚的形成是马来亚对婆罗洲领土的新殖民主义,因为马来西亚的形成不符合国际法。

 国际法要求举行全民公决,以寻求人民的愿望,无论婆罗洲领土的人民是否想与马来亚联合或想成为自己的独立国家。

 砂拉越和沙巴的婆罗洲领土是英国人赠送给马来亚的礼物,以扩大马来亚的领土。 马来亚联邦于 1963 年 9 月 16 日成立后改名为马来西亚。

 马来西亚的成立违反国际法和联合国大会第 1514 号决议

 许多法律专家认为,Cobbold 委员会的报告是欺诈的产物。 许多反对成立马来西亚的人被贴上了恐怖分子或叛乱分子的标签。 由于害怕骚扰和逮捕,许多人跑进丛林和印度尼西亚边境。 他们被武装部队追捕,被迫拿起武器自卫。 根据国际法,使用武器自卫是允许的。

  根据联合国大会第 1514 号决议的要求,英国人试图克服公投的需要和非殖民化的需要,成立了科博德委员会。 Cobbold委员会的任何成员都没有来自沙巴和砂拉越的代表。 马来亚由 Ghazali Shafie 和 Dato Ong Yoke Lin 代表。 许多人认为委员会是有偏见的,而且报告似乎必须表明砂拉越和沙巴的人民倾向于成为马来西亚的一部分。 当事情不利于马来西亚的形成时,东姑并不高兴。 请阅读 Michael Leigh 教授的 The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus 和 Dayaks,了解 Cobbold 委员会报告的不当之处。

 *温利山* 
 *肯雅兰全民党 主席* 
 

*Why there was a confrontation with Indonesia?*
*
Most Sarawakians could not understand why there was a confrontation with Indonesia and this led to fear of another war with neighbouring countries if Sarawak is independent.

The Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation or Borneo confrontation (also known by its Indonesian / Malay name, Konfrontasi) was an armed conflict from 1963 to 1966 that stemmed from Indonesia's opposition to the creation of the Federation of Malaysia.

After Indonesian president Sukarno was deposed in 1966, the dispute ended peacefully and the nation of Malaysia was formed. The reason why the confrontation took place because Sukarno said the formation of Malaysia was a neocolonism of the Borneo Territories by Malaya because the formation of Malaysia was not in accordance with international law.

International law requires a referendum be held to seek the desires of the people whether or not the people of the Borneo Territories wanted to be federated with Malaya or wanted to be independent nation of their own. 

The Borneo Territories of Sarawak and Sabah were handed as a gift by the British to Malaya to enlarge the territories of Malaya. The federation of Malaya then took a new name, Malaysia after the federation was formed on 16 September 1963.

The formation of Malaysia was against international law and against the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 

Many legal experts opined that the Cobbold Commission Report was the fruit of a fraud. Many who opposed the formation of Malaysia were branded as terrorists or insurgents. Fear of harassment and arrest, many ran into the jungle and to Indonesian Border. They were hunted by armed forces and they were forced to take arms to defend themselves. Under international law, to defend oneself with arms against arms is allowed. 

 The British tried to overcome the need of a referendum and the need to decolonization as required by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 formed the Cobbold Commission. None of the members of the Cobbold Commission had any representatives from Sabah and Sarawak. Malaya was represented By Ghazali Shafie and Dato Ong Yoke Lin. Many seen the Commission was biaised and it seems the Report must show people of Sarawak and Sabah favoured to be part of Malaysia. Tunku was not happy when things were not in favour of the formation of Malaysia. Please read The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus And Dayaks by Prof. Michael Leigh about the improperity of the Cobbold Commission Report. 

 *Voon Lee Shan* 
 *Parti Bumi Kenyalang*
*Why there was a confrontation with Indonesia?*
Most Sarawakians could not understand why there was a confrontation with Indonesia and this led to fear of another war with neighbouring countries if Sarawak is independent.

The Indonesia–Malaysia confrontation or Borneo confrontation (also known by its Indonesian / Malay name, Konfrontasi) was an armed conflict from 1963 to 1966 that stemmed from Indonesia's opposition to the creation of the Federation of Malaysia.

After Indonesian president Sukarno was deposed in 1966, the dispute ended peacefully and the nation of Malaysia was formed. The reason why the confrontation took place because Sukarno said the formation of Malaysia was a neocolonism of the Borneo Territories by Malaya because the formation of Malaysia was not in accordance with international law.

International law requires a referendum be held to seek the desires of the people whether or not the people of the Borneo Territories wanted to be federated with Malaya or wanted to be independent nation of their own. 

The Borneo Territories of Sarawak and Sabah were handed as a gift by the British to Malaya to enlarge the territories of Malaya. The federation of Malaya then took a new name, Malaysia after the federation was formed on 16 September 1963.

The formation of Malaysia was against international law and against the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514 

Many legal experts opined that the Cobbold Commission Report was the fruit of a fraud. Many who opposed the formation of Malaysia were branded as terrorists or insurgents. Fear of harassment and arrest, many ran into the jungle and to Indonesian Border. They were hunted by armed forces and they were forced to take arms to defend themselves. Under international law, to defend oneself with arms against arms is allowed. 

 The British tried to overcome the need of a referendum and the need to decolonization of colonies as required by the United Nations General Assembly Resolution 1514, formed the Cobbold Commission.

None of the members of the Cobbold Commission had any representatives from Sabah and Sarawak. 

Malaya was represented By Ghazali Shafie and Dato Ong Yoke Lin. Many seen the Commission was biaised and it seems the Report must show people of Sarawak and Sabah favoured to be part of Malaysia. Tunku was not happy when things were not in favour of the formation of Malaysia. Please read The Rising Moon & Deals, Datus And Dayaks by Prof. Michael Leigh about the improperity of the Cobbold Commission Report. 

Voon Lee Shan 
Parti Bumi Kenyalang

Autonomy VS Independence

Autonomy Independence

*Autonomy*

Chagos island case, UN International Court of Justice determined on 25-2-2019 that the international law on treaty making provides that only sovereign independent states can make treaties and colonies (who are non self governing territories) are not sovereign independent states with power to make such treaty with independent states. 

Therefore MA63 was not validly entered into because Sabah & Sarawak were not sovereign independent states when MA63 Treaty was signed. At the time that the Treaty was signed, Sabah and Sarawak were still colonies of Britain. 

If MA63 is void then there is no need to talk about autonomy. Sarawak presently has autonomy over her immigration. 

 All other ministries are subjected to the decisions and directives of Federal Government. So if MA63 is void, all authority and power shall revert to Sarawak fully and Sarawak shall have full control of all matters.

*Independence* 

The international right to independence is enshrined in United Nations Resolution 1514 on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples which allows colonies the privilege to decolonize and to become independence countries. This UN Resolution 1514 has a force of law recognised by the international community and Malaysia, being a member nation has to respect this Resolution. Failing to do so can invite serious economic and political consequences against Malaysia. 

Malaya gained independence from Britain in 1957 and according to the Notification filed by Malaya on 16.9.1963, Malaya took a new name Malaysia after Sabah & Sarawak were acquired to enlarge its territory. Sabah and Sarawak were not independent nations when they were handed by Britain as a gift to Malaya. 

When Singapore exited Malaysia, the Singapore Independence Act 1966 was passed in the Malaysian parliament granting Singapore her independence. 

The 1976 Malaysian Constitutional amendment reduces our status from a country to a state.

Further derogation of our dignity by Malaya was the passing of laws by the Malaysian Parliament to take ownership of our oil and gas under the Petroleum Development Act 1974 and our waters by passing the Territorial Sea Act 2012 amongst other things. 

If Sarawak is an independent nation, her territory, oil and gas will naturally revert to her under the UN’s Continental Shelf Act 1964. This will mean that all revenues derived from Sarawak seabeds, subsoils and natural resources will belong to Sarawak and collectible by Sarawak alone. 

The UN International Court of Justice in 2008 opined that Kosovo (a non independent state with independent Serbia) had an intrinsic right to independence as provided by the Decolonization Act 1960. Therefore, guided by this international law, our Sarawak Legislature is a powerful body that can unilaterally declare Sarawak’s independence on grounds not only on invalidity of MA63 Treaty but also on grounds of suppression, domination, economic and political differences with Malaya.