Blog and Tweet 9/9/2018 砂独立进行曲

这边如果有些东西，你们去分析，和简单了解找这些步骤。就会明白和了解了。

1。***MA63

2。***托管治

3。***自主权

4。***自决权

联合国官方网站显示砂拉越是处在change in status。我们会想这个字status代表什么意思？当一个国家自己政治还是不能掌握负责照顾自己国民，没有经济力量建设各种设施福利人民时，那就是处在change in status。当一个国家的政治已经可以完全负责fully responsible 照顾自己国民和地方时，change in status 就会转换成independence 独立。这是英国法act对一个国家的status解释。

Jack Tang 10:41 AM你就跟他们说这次砂议会选举很重要，也是关系到下一代未来。砂现在的主权又在已经开始被侵犯，例如。教育，宗教，移民局和我们砂IC 已经开始在进行了。这些已经报道开始出现。就让他们了解下。所以为什么民运开始就是保护未来，再来这次就是要砂人民手中一票投向把砂独立议程砂人民代仪推进砂议会。不要在投向，国政党，外来党和本土党和土团党。

My comments:
I only realised that autonomy and independence mean two different things a day or two days ago.   Sarawak autonomy has been eroded due to long years of collusion and corruption of Federal crowned Sarawakian political clowns and autocratic federal masters.  These political clowns have betrayed the autonomy of Sarawak all the time.

topics.dirwell.com

A Result Of The Partitioning Of The World!

By Usha Bhavani

      The political map grows while the World breaks! The lines on the map get rearranged with every new division, and looks like an old Roman fresco. The last 50 years saw the formation of 100 “new countries.” This is nothing new and has been happening since 400 AD, when empires around the world partitioned into smaller countries.

       The period of separatism continues: The Tibetans want their country back; the Uighurs don’t want to have anything to do with China;  Arunachal Pradesh that is claimed by both India and China, claims itself; tiny Belgium is going to get tinier; Sudan is on the verge of division; the USSR is already fractured multiple times; and with two Koreas, two Samoas and three Guianas, it would be surprising if people stop fighting for a small bit of the countryside they can convert into yet another – “tiny” country.  No sooner is this tiny country formed; tinier parts within this tiny country start fighting and want to be their own whole …..and so on.
       While the last two decades has seen no changes in the International maps of North and South America; Europe has given birth to many new nations; new countries have been added to Asian, African and Australian continents. Over 30 countries came into existence since 1990.  More than half of them are due to the disintegration of the USSR.

Photo by en.wikipedia.org

Here is a list of the world’s newest countries:

Southern Sudan

(Not yet formed – Expected Date of Independence July 9, 2011)
Sudan is getting ready for what could be the continent’s biggest divorce. January 2011 – saw an overwhelming response from Sudanese, casting their vote in favor of creating an independent state in the southern region.  A referendum (a direct vote in which an entire electorate participates) held in January 2011 was devastating in its consequences, indicating that a whooping 98% majority of people voted for a separate country.  South Sudan could very well become the world’s newest country on July 9, 2011.

Photo by rightsmonitoring.org

President Barack Obama calls this division a “historic step.”
There are many that wonder, how Obama calls this historic, when he is such an ardent admirer of Abraham Lincoln, who took his nation to war to prevent his country from splitting.

Kosovo

(Part of former Yugoslavia – Independence 2008)
A part of the former Yugoslavia, Kosovo became a part of Serbia as an autonomous province, after Yugoslavia fell. The country fought a long struggle for independence and was also under transitional UN administration (UNMIK) from 1999. It was finally declared independent on Feb 17, 2008, and listed as one of the newest countries of the world.
But not all countries recognize Kosovo as independent

Photo by en.wikipedia.org

Although majority of the countries of the world accepted Kosovo as an independent country; there are still many countries, including Serbia, which doesn’t recognize the move.  Russia and India also insist it is not independent. The reason being, the declaration of independence was done by individual members of the Assembly of Kosovo and not by the Assembly itself.  Serbia asked international support in finding this declaration of independence “illegal.”  Taking into consideration Serbia’s request, United Nations General Assembly requested an opinion from the International Court of Justice.  The Court decided that the declaration was not illegal, but also not an official act!

Timor-Leste or East Timor

(Formerly annexed by Indonesia – Independence 2002)
       Although, the Democratic Republic of Timor-Leste declared independence from Portuguese rule in 1975; soon after that, it was annexed by Indonesia.  After over two decades of Indonesian occupation, Timor-Leste regained its independence on May 20, 2002, gaining the distinction of being the first-born of the 21st century World.

Photo by commons.wikimedia.org

In Asia, there are two Roman Catholic dominated countries; one is Philippines and the other is Timor-Leste, which occupies the eastern half of the Timor Island. The country is currently experiencing a climate of post-conflict nation building.

Serbia and Montenegro

(Part of former Yugoslavia – Independence 2006
When Yugoslavia collapsed and four of its six republics became independent in the early 1990s, only Serbia and Montenegro remained within from 1992 to 2006.  But in 2006, there was an independence referendum, where the Montenegrins voted on behalf of a separate country.  This separation led to the formation of two independent countries: Serbia and Montenegro.  Serbia finally became independent after 88 years in different federations.   It is located at the crossroads of Southeastern and Central Europe.  Montenegro is located in Southeastern Europe.

Photo by en.wikipedia.org

Palau

(Formerly under US administration – Independence 1994)
With the end of US Sovereignty over Pacific Islands, the tiny island group’s status as the last United Nations trust territory came to an end on October 1, 1994.  After having been sold by Spain to Germany, control passed to Japan in 1914, to the United States in 1944.  In 1947, United Nations passed on the power officially to the United States, as part of the Trust Territory of the Pacific Islands.

Photo by commons.wikimedia.org

Palau asked for independence in 1978 and became the Republic of Palau in 1981. It signed a Compact of Free Association with the U.S. in 1982.  After eight referendums, the Compact was accepted in 1993, leading to its independence.  According to the agreement, the U.S. military is granted access to the islands for 50 years. This island in the Pacific Ocean is one of world’s smallest states.

Eritrea

(Formerly a part of Ethiopia – Independence 1993)
This nation in Northeastern Africa underwent a struggle that resulted in its independence on May 24, 1993.  Before World War II, since the 1880s, Eritrea was an Italian colony, and then it was under British control when the Italians were clobbered by the Brits in 1941. In 1952, the UN passed a ruling that Ethiopia should take the “trusteeship” of Eritrea.

Photo by en.wikipedia.org

But after ten years, Ethiopia got greedy and forcibly annexed (incorporate a territory into an existing state or country) Eritrea, which forced Eritreans to begin their struggle for independence that ended in 1991 when they defeated the governmental forces. Independence was overwhelmingly approved in a 1993 referendum.
* However, a border war that started in 1998 with Ethiopia is still going on.

The Czech Republic and Slovakia

(Formerly in Czechoslovakia – Independence 1993)
Ending the decades of communist rule, Czechoslovakia became a democracy in the year 1989.  It was a federal republic with two components; Czech Republic with the capital in Prague and the Slovak Republic with the capital in Bratislava.

Photo by en.wikipedia.org

A strong secessionist movement that started in Slovakia led to the formal declaration of independence on Aug 26, 1992, for both the Czech Republic and the Slovak Republic.  The declaration stated that the two would separate into independent states on Jan 1, 1993.  Thus the 74-year-old federation came to an end.

Bosnia and Herzegovina

(Formerly a part of Yugoslavia – Independence 1992)
Bosnia and Herzegovina declared independence from Yugoslavia on March 3, 1992, following a referendum. At the end of World War II, both Bosnia and Herzegovina became part of the six republics of the Communist Yugoslavia, headed by Marshall Tito. When Tito died in 1980, the iron curtain that was in place fell and Yugoslavia began to disintegrate.
         In 1991, both the republics declared independence and asked for recognition by the European Union (EU). The referendum for independence led to Bosnian voters choosing independence.
       Bosnia and Herzegovina are part of the triangular-shaped republic, on the Balkan Peninsula.  The Bosnian area is to the north and has mountains and thick forests.  Herzegovina is in the south and consists of flat and rugged farmland.

Croatia and Macedonia

(Formerly in Yugoslavia – Independence 1991)
          There are other countries that became independent when Yugoslavia dissolved, such as Croatia and Macedonia that dissolved in 1991.  Croatia declared independence in June 25, 1991 and Macedonia in Sep 8, 1991.
However, Macedonia wasn’t recognized by the United Nations until 1993.  United States and Russia recognized it as an independent entity only in 1994.

15 Independent Countries

(Formerly the Soviet Union – Independence for 15 countries 1991)
As mentioned earlier in this article, there are many more countries that became independent since 1990.  In 1991, 15 new countries declared independence – after the USSR dissolved.  Most of them declared independence within a few months of the fall of the Soviet Union in late 1991.

These countries include:

1. Armenia
2. Azerbaijan
3. Belarus
4. Estonia
5. Georgia
6. Kazakhstan
7. Kyrgyzstan
8. Latvia
9. Lithuania
10. Moldova
11. Russia
12. Tajikistan
13. Turkmenistan
14. Ukraine
15. Uzbekistan

Apart from this, other countries that fall into the category of “newest countries,” which became independent for various reasons, include Namibia which gained independence from South Africa; unified Yemen from North and South Yemen; unified Germany from  East and West Germany; The Marshall Islands from the Trust Territory of Pacific Islands; Micronesia from the United States.
      Pay attention and you will find that most of the countries in the world today are relatively new and in the development stage. Not many are over 100 years old. Separatist movements are happening all over the globe. Where are we today? Where are we heading?
Tags: new countries, new countries in the world, newest countries, world map, World’s newest countries

The 9 newest countries in the world

https://www.facebook.com/mradamtaylor

The Scottish flag (R) and British Union Jack (L) fly outside the Scotland Office in London on Aug. 28, 2014. EPA/FACUNDO ARRIZABALAGA

This week, Scottish voters go to the polls to make a big decision: Should they stay a part of the United Kingdom and Northern Ireland, or become an independent sovereign state?
        It's an enormous decision, and the debate over what exactly will happen to Scotland if it does go independent is still waging. One thing is certain, however: if the "yes" vote wins, Scotland will become the newest independent state in the world, pushing South Sudan to Number 2 and Kosovo to Number 3.
       Will Scotland follow the same fate as any of the other young nations in the world? Perhaps, but probably not. A glance down the list of the nine newest sovereign states below reveals that each situation is unique: It's hard to fully equate Scotland's situation with that of Slovakia, let alone with East Timor.
Even so, a glance back at history does show that the world's borders are changing more than we might appreciate: And the changes can sometimes take some time to settle.

July 2011 – South Sudan

United Nations Mission in Sudan (UNAMIS) personnel guard South Sudanese people displaced by recent fighting in Jabel, on the outskirts of capital Juba on Dec. 23, 2013. REUTERS/James Akena

South Sudan declared independence from Sudan on July 9, 2011, after a bloody civil war with the ethnically Arab north that had lasted decades. Almost 99 percent of voters had voted for independence in a referendum, and the new country was swiftly recognized by the international community. The United States played a key role in the South Sudan's journey to statehood.
          However, since independence the country has faced a number of problems, most of which can be traced back to two big factors: 1) South Sudan's high poverty rate, 2) the ethnically diverse political movements in the country that now lack a common enemy. Add to that large and largely untapped natural resources, and you have a young country that has been beset by political infighting in the past few years.
         Right now, South Sudan is nine months into a civil war that has displaced a million of its 11 million people, and facing a famine that could see 50,000 children die before the end of the year.

February 2008 – Kosovo

Kosovars and foreign visitors take their seats on a raised platform to watch a documentary film during Dokufest in Prizren on Aug. 20, 2014.  REUTERS/Hazir Reka

Kosovo declared independence from Serbia on Feb. 17, 2008. The country had been administered by the United Nations since 1999, when NATO bombed Serbia and forced then-President Slobodan Milosevic to withdraw his troops from the ethnically divided province.
Kosovo's independence was opposed by Russia, which warned of other breakaway movements (worth remembering during the Crimea crisis) and Serbia, which had expressed fears for the ethnic Serbs who live there. While a small majority of U.N. member states recognize Kosovo, the country has not applied for U.N. membership out of concern.
Kosovo's post-independence statehood has not been free of problems: Ethnic tension and organized crime remain, and the country's economy is clearly underdeveloped (the official unemployment rate last year was 45 percent).

June 2006 – Montenegro and Serbia

Montenegro players celebrate after scoring during the Euro 2016 qualifying match between Montenegro and Moldova, at the City Stadium in Podgorica, Montenegro, Sept. 8, 2014. (AP Photo/Risto Bozovic)

The single nation of Serbia and Montenegro, formed after the collapse of Yugoslavia in 1991, changed into the State Union of Serbia and Montenegro in 2003, and finally into the two separate states of Serbia and Montenegro in 2006.
       It was Montenegro that ultimately ended the relationship, with a referendum on May 21, 2006, that found just over 55 percent wanted to end its ties with Serbia.  On June 3, Montenegro declared independence.  A few days later, Serbia followed suit.
         Since independence, Montenegro has applied for E.U. membership, joined the World Trade Organization, and rehabilitated its long-exiled monarchy.  Generally, it's economic record since independence has been viewed positively.
     Of course, Montenegro's independence ultimately left Serbia effectively a "new" state too, though it was the legal successor to the union.  Since 2006, the country has generally pursued pro-European policies, and it is on track to membership of the European Union (though Kosovo's independence remains an issue). Under President Tomislav Nikolic, elected two years ago, the country has tried to balance a future in Europe with a partnership with its traditional ally, Russia.

May 2002 – East Timor

      Outgoing Indonesian President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono (L) and East Timor Prime Minister Xanana Gusmao (R) shake hands before their meeting in Dili on Aug. 26, 2014.  AFP PHOTO / VALENTINO DE SOUSAROMEO

      East Timor, now also known as Timor-Leste, achieved independence on May 20, 2002, but the country had effectively voted for independence years before, when a referendum delivered a clear vote that clearly rejected the proposed "special autonomy" within Indonesia.   After that referendum, there was brutal violence in the region with pro-Indonesian militias attacking citizens, and a special U.N. force had to be deployed to the country.
      The country had already suffered. According to a U.N. report from 2006, Indonesia may have directly or indirectly killed as many as 180,000 people in East Timor after they invaded the country when its colonial ruler, Portugal, left in 1975. The situation in East Timor had made headlines around the world since 1991, when at least 250 pro-independence demonstrators were shot dead.
      After independence, some troubles have remained: In 2006, the U.N. had to redeploy troops after fighting resumed. However, the country has enjoyed profits from its large oil reserves, and enjoyed some substantial growth: The World Bank says that the "social and economic development in Timor-Leste can be seen as remarkable."

October 1994 – Palau

In this undated handout photograph received from Richard W. Brooks on Aug. 27, 2014, a grey reef shark is seen riding the incoming tide, to conserve energy, in the small Pacific island nation of Palau. AFP PHOTO / Richard W. Brooks

        Palau, geographically part of the larger Micronesia island group in the western Pacific Ocean, is the least populated country on this list, with a little over 21,000 people living on around 250 islands. It became independent on Oct. 1, 1994, 15 years after it had decided against becoming part of Micronesia due to cultural and linguistic differences.
       The islands that make up Palau had passed through various colonial hands over the years, before coming under the United Nations Trust Territory of the Pacific, administered by the United States, after World War II.  It's relationship with the United States remains a Compact of Free Association, which means the United States offers financial aid and retains military authority.  In 2009, the country agreed to accept 6 Uighur detainees from Guantanamo Bay, sparking controversy.  The country is one of the wealthiest Pacific Island states, and is known for its tourism industry.

April 1993 – Eritrea

A file photo taken on Aug. 6, 2014, shows three young men from Eritrea crossing the border between Italy and France on a regional train, near Nice, southeastern France. AFP PHOTO / JEAN CHRISTOPHE MAGNENET

          The United Nations established Eritrea as an autonomous region within the Ethiopian federation in 1952.  However, when Ethiopia, under emperor Haile Selassie, annexed the region in 1962, it sparked a civil war that lasted 30 years. In 1991, the Eritrean People's Liberation Front (EPLF) ousted the Ethiopian forces, and on April 27, 1993, the country declared independence after a referendum.
         Since independence, there have been a number of disputes with Ethiopia, including a border war in 1998 that lasted more than two years.   In that time, the country has been ruled by one president, Isaias Afwerki, who has been widely criticized for repressive government tactics, earning the country the nickname "The North Korea of Africa."

January 1993 – The Czech Republic and Slovakia

        Actors reanact scenes from mobilization at the SNP square in the central Slovak town of Banska Bystrica on Aug. 30, 2014, to commemorate the 70th anniversary of the Slovakia's National Uprising (SNP). AFP PHOTO/JOE KLAMAR

On Jan. 1, 1993, Czechoslovakia was dissolved by parliament into two countries: The Czech Republic and Slovakia.  After the "Velvet Revolution" ended one-party Communist rule, it was the "Velvet Divorce."
        Immediately after the split, there appeared to be some trepidation: The New York Times noted "wide regret"at the end of the nation that was formed after World War I. However, the contemporary view is that the split was a (relative) success: "The split was really smooth,"  Slovakian journalist Pavol Mudry told the BBC last year. Both countries have joined the European Union (with Slovakia even taking on the euro) and have had largely stable, at times burgeoning, economies since independence.
        Not everyone is happy with the split, however.  In the run-up to the Scottish vote, Pavel Seifter, a former Czech ambassador to Britain, argued in the Guardian that neither country really appreciated what they had lost.

Notable mentions

         South Ossetia, a breakaway region of Georgia, declared independence in 1990, but it was only after war between Russia and Georgia in 2008 that Russia and a small number of other countries (most notably  Nicaragua and Venezuela) recognized it. The region is not widely recognized, however, and is instead seen as one of a number "gray areas" or "frozen conflicts" in the post-Soviet space. 

          Since 2008, South Ossetia has struggled economically, and political divisions have led to tense scenes.
         Quebec held a referendum on independence from Canada in 1995, and the "No" vote won by a small margin. It was the province's second vote on independence (the first was defeated in 1980), and the separatist movement within Quebec did not disappear after the second failure.   The situation had a number of similarities with the Scottish vote, and a number of Quebec sovereigntists have traveled to Scotland to observe the vote, with the hope they may pick up some ideas to perk up their cause.

historytoday.com

Norway and 1905

       Stuart Burch | Published in History Today Volume 55 Issue 6 June 2005

Stuart Burch considers the significance to Norway – both in terms of the past and the present – of the anniversary of 1905, when the country at last won its independence from Sweden.

       Exactly one hundred years ago the people of Norway were going through a momentous period in their history. The dramatic events pivoted around June 7th, 1905. On that day the parliament in Kristiana (Oslo) instigated what might be termed a revolution when they voted to dissolve the union with Sweden that had been forced upon Norway by the Treaty of Kiel (1814). A plebiscite later that summer confirmed massive public support for independence and, following successful negotiations in the Swedish town of Karlstad, military conflict was averted. When a rueful Oscar II abdicated the throne on October 26th, Norway was able to fully savour complete independence for the first time in four centuries of almost unbroken foreign influence, firstly from Denmark and then Sweden.
      For a few months in 1814, as the Napoleonic wars neared their end, Norway had experienced autonomy and on May 17th a constitution was ratified.  Although a swift and decisive military campaign by Sweden put paid to hopes of sovereignty, this constitution was subsequently used as the basis for Swedish rule. Norway enjoyed a large measure of self-governance, but at the international level it felt constrained.  Calls for a separate consular service were the catalyst for the withdrawal from the union in 1905. And it is the passing of one hundred years since Norway gained ‘a voice of its own’ in the international community that is one of the principal themes of this year’s centenary.

        To read this article in full you need to be either a print + archive subscriber, or else have purchased access to the online archive.
If you are already a subscriber, please ensure you are logged in.
Buy Subscription | Buy Online Access | Log In
If you are logged in and still cannot read the article, please email digital@historytoday.com.

Get Miscellanies, our free weekly long read, in your inbox every week

theborneopost.com

MA63 can’t be revived just by setting up special cabinet committee – Soo

September 5, 2018, Wednesday

Lina Soo

KUCHING: The Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) cannot be revived simply by setting up a Special Cabinet Committee, said Sarawak Reform Party (STAR) president Lina Soo.
She pointed out that the federal government should just comply with the MA63 without the need to revive, discuss, review or rectify it.
“The MA63 has been negotiated, signed and sealed on July 9, 1963, but never delivered. The treaty has remained on the shelf in a comatose state for 55 years.
“A review cannot be done without all signatory nations – Britain, Malaya, Sarawak, Sabah and Singapore – going back to the negotiating table,” she said in a statement yesterday.
She was commenting on the recent statement by Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Law) Datuk Liew Vui Keong that a Special Cabinet Committee will be set up in response to Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad’s call to revive the agreement to honour all pledges outlined within it.
Soo stressed that to revive the MA63 by setting up another committee would be “aimless and fruitless without the political will of the signatory nation”.
She also opined that Liew had no authority to deal with MA63, an international treaty registered with United Nations (UN).
“The Law Minister with his Special Cabinet Committee cannot deal in an international multilateral affair which requires the participation of the governments of Britain, Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak and Singapore.”
She added that if MA63 is still valid, all the federal government needs to do is to comply with everything that is laid down in the agreement.
“There is no need for further discussion, review and rectification.”

What do you think of this story?

• Great (97%)
  
   My comments:
  
  
  Blog and Tweet 7/9/2018
  Dr. M, the old fox said the PH-crowned government would treat Sabah and Sarawak fairly.  Treating Sabah and Sarawak fairly or not fairly is funny to us in every sense.  Is it not ridiculous to use our wealth in oil and gas resources to award us fairly.  The words sound just too autocratic and shrilling to be accepted when we are three nations of equal status based on MA63.  How come that we have become 12^th and 13^th state respectively in the Federation of Malaysia registered in the book of the United Nations.  Is it not blatantly autocratic?  Should these amendents be settled once and for all among the three nations in the Federation or to the Court of the United Nations?  
  
  
  Changing the terms and conditions stipulated in MA63 to fit in to the dominating rules of the Federal Malayan colonial masters is unconstitutional and a Breach of Trust internationally.  After Sabah and Sarawak entrused by the British government.  We are clear about our status.  Now, many people in Sarawak like me have set our mind to fight for the cause of our secession from the Federation of Malaysia which stands for ______________________ (blanks to fill in). 
  
  
  Ya, Norway's secession from Sweden in 1905 should serve a very good example for us.
  
  

Blog and Tweet 7/9/2018 Laws after all

Blog and Tweet   7/9/2018    Laws after all

        There has not been any law, I know, that allows people to revolt since time immemorial.  Revolution just happened again and again through human history when people found life hard to sustain under heavy taxation and irrational suppression.  The most impressive one is the French revolution to me.  A Tale of Two Cities is French Revolution based.  It is an interesting story book to read. 

        There has not been any law that allows people to secede a Federation for good.  There is one country after another seceding the Federation for good.  Which law has the binding power when the majority of people rise up for the common cause? 

theborneopost.com

‘English option only possible if state has education autonomy’

Karen Bong, reporters@theborneopost.com

Dato Sri Fatimah Abdullah

KUCHING: National schools in the state will only be able to use English as the medium of instruction if there are changes in existing laws and policies that would give Sarawak autonomy over its education.
Welfare, Community Wellbeing, Women, Family and Childhood Development Minister Dato Sri Fatimah Abdullah said barring such changes, Bahasa Malaysia will remain the medium of instruction for all national schools in the country.
“Education is still under the purview of the federal government and we (Sarawak) are part of Malaysia and as such, are bound by the Federal Constitution and the National Language Act as well as the Education Act.
“So unless there is a change in the law, unless Sarawak has the autonomy on education like before, the hard fact is that Bahasa Malaysia should be the legal medium of instruction in our schools. We have to follow,” she told The Borneo Post when contacted yesterday.
Fatimah was responding to a news report that the Education Ministry was against the use of English as the medium of instruction in national schools in the country.
The ministry in a written parliamentary reply was responding to Batang Sadong MP Dato Sri Nancy Shukri who had asked for the ministry’s stance on Sarawak schools using English as the medium of instruction.
On the past proposal for the reintroduction of teaching Mathematics and Science in English, Fatimah explained that during that time, schools were given a choice to use English for the two subjects if they were ready and had majority support from parents.
“It (teaching Mathematics and Science in English) was not meant to replace Bahasa Malaysia as the medium of instruction but (only) for certain subjects because after all, most science and scientific articles and books are written in English.
“It was proposed to enhance or raise the standard of English among the young and future generation,” she pointed out.
However, Fatimah pointed out that various issues such as training, recruitment and posting of teachers must be addressed first before schools can raise the standard of English among students.
“Learning English or other foreign languages requires a great amount of time and exposure in using the language in writing and communicating. We need the right teachers with finesse for the job and not some square peg in a round hole.”

What do you think of this story?

• Angry (90%)
  My comments:
          This X-BN-crowned and now GPS crowned political clown is too federal minded and ever-ready to follow blindly to safeguard her self-interest and official position as i believe that she is chained in one way or another being in this highly contaminated water for far too long.  
  
  She knows far too well how to win the people in her constituency.  She acts and plays too well to be detected by rural people as far as floods road system and other infrastructure in the said constituency are concerned.
  
  Will she still hold the seat after our Sarawak national election in 2021?