Government and Politics
Finland Table of Contents 
SINCE THE ESTABLISHMENT of its present system of government in 1919,
        Finland has been one of the more fortunate members of the Western
        community of democratic nations. Compared with other European states,
        the country was only moderately affected by the political turmoil of the
        interwar period; it passed through World War II relatively unscathed;
        and, although right on the line that divided Europe into two hostile
        blocs after the second half of the 1940s, it survived as an independent
        nation with its democratic institutions intact.
        
        This enviable record was achieved against formidable odds. Although
        the constitutional basis of their government grew out of
        long-established institutions, Finns had never been fully free to govern
        themselves until late 1917 when they achieved national independence.
        Swedish and Russian rulers had always ultimately determined their
        affairs. Finnish society was also marked by deep fissures that became
        deeper after the brief civil war (1918), which left scars that needed
        several generations to heal. In addition to class and political
        divisions, the country also had to contend with regional and linguistic
        differences. These problems were eventually surmounted, and by the 1980s
        the watchword in Finnish politics was consensus.
        
         A skillfully constructed system of government allowed Finns to manage
        their affairs with the participation of all social groups (although
        there were some serious lapses in the interwar period). Checks and
        balances, built into a system of modified separation of powers, enabled
        the government to function democratically and protected the basic rights
        of all citizens. The 200-member parliament, the Eduskunta, elected by
        popular vote, was sovereign by virtue of its representing the Finnish
        people. An elected president wielded supreme executive power and
        determined foreign policy. Although not responsible politically to the
        Eduskunta, the president could carry out many of his functions only
        through a cabinet government, the Council of State, which was dependent
        upon the support of the Eduskunta. An independent judiciary, assisted by
        two legal officials with broad independent powers--the chancellor of
        justice and the parliamentary ombudsman--ensured that government
        institutions adhered to the law.
        
           Working within this system during the 1980s were a variety of
        political parties, an average of about a dozen, ranging from sect-like
        groups to large well-established parties, the counterparts of which were
        to be found all over Western Europe. The socialist wing consisted of a
        deeply split communist movement and a moderate Finnish Social Democratic
        Party that by the late 1980s was a preeminent governing party.  The
        center was occupied by an agrarian party, the Center Party, which had
        been in government almost continuously until 1987; the Swedish People's
        Party; and a formerly right-wing protest party, the Finnish Rural Party. 
        The right was dominated by the National Coalition Party, which was
        fairly moderate in its conservatism.  In the 1970s and the 1980s, the
        mainstream parties, and even a good part of the Communist Party of
        Finland, had moved toward the center, and the political spectrum as a
        whole was slightly more to the right than it had been in previous
        decades.
        
          A constitutional system that was conservative in nature had allowed
        these parties to work together, yet within constraints that permitted no
        single group to usurp the rights of another.  Nevertheless, the variety
        of parties had made it very difficult to put together coalitions that
        could attain the strict qualified majorities needed to effect
        fundamental changes.  Only since the second half of the 1960s had it been
        possible, though at times difficult, to find a broad enough multiparty
        consensus.
        
        Powerful interest groups were also involved in Finnish politics, most
        noticeably in the negotiation and the realization of biannual income
        policy settlements that, since the late 1960s, had affected most Finnish
        wage-earners. Interest groups initially negotiated the terms of a new
        wage agreement; then it was, in effect, ratified by coalitions of
        parties in government; and finally the Eduskunta passed the social and
        economic legislation that underlay it.  Some observers complained that
        government's role had become overly passive in this process and that the
        preeminence of consensus actually meant that Finnish politics offered
        the populace no real alternatives.   Yet most Finns, remembering earlier
        years of industrial strife and poverty, preferred the new means of
        managing public affairs.
        
        There was also broad agreement about Finnish foreign policy.  The
        country was threatened with extinction as an independent nation after
        World War II, but presidents Juho Paasikivi and Urho Kekkonen, both
        masters of realpolitik, led their countrymen to a new relationship with
        the Soviet Union.  The core of this relationship was Finland's guarantee
        to the Soviet Union that its northeastern border region was militarily
        secure.   Controversial as the so-called Paasikivi-Kekkonen Line was
        initially, by the 1980s the vast majority of Finns approved of the way
        Finland dealt with its large neighbor and were well aware, too, of the
        trade advantages the special relationship had brought to their country.
        
        Working in tandem with good Finnish-Soviet relations was the policy
        of active and peaceful neutrality, the backbone of Finnish foreign
        policy. Advocating, as a neutral state, the settlement of disputes
        through peaceful, legal means was a role Finns adopted willingly.  A high
        point of this policy was the part the country played in planning and in
        hosting the 1975 Conference on Security and Cooperation in Europe. 
        Another facet of active neutrality was a committed membership in the
        United Nations, most notably in the organization's peacekeeping forces.
CONSTITUTIONAL
        FRAMEWORK
        Constitutional Development
The Constitution
GOVERNMENTAL
        INSTITUTIONS
Legislature
President
Council of State
Legal System
Civil Service
Provincial
        Administration
Local Administration
Electoral System
Aland Islands
POLITICAL DYNAMICS
The Social Democratic
        Party
The Center Party
The National
        Coalition Party
The Communist Party
The Swedish People's
        Party
Smaller Parties and
        the Greens
Interest Groups
FOREIGN RELATIONS
For more information about the government, see 
Facts
      about Finland.