Blog and Tweet 27/9/2018 The Curses of Centralisation and Monopoly

Blog and Tweet  27/9/2018  The Curses of Centralisation and Monopoly

        The centralization of the federal power to control the 11 states in Peninsular Malaya and two colonised territories in Sarawak and Sabah allow the evils and sins of corruption and collusion to penetrate to every agencies of the government.

        In the name of National Sdn Bhd, we bear witness how Dr. Mahathir, controlled the companies Petronas, Khazanah ……and many, many other government-linked companies during his last tenure as Prime Minister of Malaysia from 1981-2003.  We all bear witness how he amassed ill-gotten wealth for himself and his family through different economic activities.  He gave out one mega-project after another mega-project which he gained in terms of n% commission, shares and so on through these projects.  It is said that he and his family posses the wealth worth US40 billion (RM160 billion).

     The so-called National Sdn Bhd like Petronas, Khazanah ….became more or less his private companies.  It is tax-payer-funded companies but he exploited them abusively.  We bear witness how he and his son headed these companies and the shares his other children owned in many, many companies.  We bear witness how they have become ultra-rich at the expense of the mass. 

        When Abdullah Badawi succeeded him as Prime Minister from 2003-2009, he tried to undo many bad practices of Dr. M. 

        When Najib succeeded Abdulla Badawi, he created another company called IMDB which led him to many criminal acts and sins and his downfall.  Najib, had mixed-up and messed up the public funds for his own gains and benefits though may not be as much as Dr. M.  He got entangled in the global scandalous IMDB criminal breaches of trust.   But Game-time for Prime Minister to abuse his power at will ended with the wide-awareness of the people.  Thus he was flushed out by the power of the people on 509.  

       Ironically, it was done or ‘killed’ by Dr. M being the leader  who had been the arch-builder for the foundation of all kinds of corruption and collusion taking place in the federation of Malaysia. 

       It is Dr. M who has created all these legacies of concentration of power and monopoly.  Hence, we bear witness all kinds of power abuse.  It is nothing surprising.  It is said, “No extreme can last.” 

        Now PH crowned Dr. M is still so autocratic as he still appointed himself to be the chairman of Khazanah Nasional Berhad.   He founded Khazanah Nasional Bhd in 1994 to his full advantage.  He also took full advantage of Petronas which is answerable to Prime Minister.  I only started finding out what Khazanah National Bhd which has been in existences since 1994 is all about after 509. 

       

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_Maverick)

Konsortium Perkapalan

In early 1998, Petronas acquired a debt-laden shipping concern controlled by Mahathir’s eldest son Mirzan Mahathir’s Konsortium Perkapalan for RM 226 million and assumed its debts of more than 324 million, according to Far Eastern Economic Review stating the debt at RM 1.6 billion.

Sapura-Kenaca Petroleum

In early November 2012, Petronas Carigali Sdn Bhd reportedly awarded a RM700 million contract to a Sapura-Kencana Petroleum Bhd wholly owned subsidiary where Mahathir’s son Mokhzani is a vice-chairman. When asked during a press conference whether there was conflict of interest in the deal, Hampeh Mahathir replied in a sarcastic tone, "Yes of course, he (Mokhzani) is given it because I instructed Petronas. Put that in your paper. I presided over everything. I told them, please give to my son and not to anybody else. That’s what I have been doing all the time. When I was the prime minister, everything was given to my children. .."
Furthermore, in 1998, when Mahathir's eldest son Mirzan Mahathir lost 0.2 billion in a Macau casino, and his daughter was under house arrest, Mahathir ordered the then finance minister Daim to use national reserves to rescue his son.

Proton and MV Agusta : The Story

Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir was appointed as Proton advisor in 2003. Since 1999, MV Agusta was heavily in debt, and the manufacturer was bought by Proton in December 2004 for €70 million. However, the Proton management decided to sell the stake to GEVI SpA, a Genoa-based financing company related to Carige, in December 2005, just for a token one euro.
During the selling negotiation process, there were a lot of Malaysian voices to object the deal, however, all was ignored by Proton. As the result, the selling deal caused Malaysian taxpayers facing total losses of 138.4 Million Euro (RM1.92 B), including the assets that MV Agusta have.
Malaysia corruption society root cause start from Tun Mahathir era's bail out to son and cronies company etc. At the UMNO General Assembly in 1998, a leading Anwar supporter, Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, criticised the government for not doing enough to combat corruption and cronyism.
According to Malaysian Maverick, Tun Mahathir's era cost RM 100 billion in taxpayers' money. This included misuse of national reserves on silver price speculation and BNM's forex speculaton on Tun Mahathir's order.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malaysian_Maverick)

ipfs.io

Kingdom of Sarawak

The Kingdom of Sarawak was a state in Borneo established in 1841 by James Brooke receiving independent kingdom status from the Sultanate of Brunei as a reward for helping fight piracy and insurgency. Its statehood and identity as a sovereign country was first recognised by the United States in 1850 and then the United Kingdom in 1863. In 1888 Charles Anthoni Johnson Brooke, the successor of James Brooke, accepted a British protectorate, which it remained until 1946, when the third ruler Charles Vyner Brooke ceded his rights to the United Kingdom. Sarawak gained its independence from the British on 22 July 1963 and formed the Federation of Malaysia together with Singapore, North Borneo and the Federation of Malaya on 16 September 1963.

History

A sketch of Pangeran Raja Muda Hashim.

Sarawak was part of the Sultanate of Brunei in Borneo. During the reign of Pangeran Indera Mahkota, Sarawak was in chaos from piracy and insurgency. Sultan Omar Ali Saifuddin II (1827–1852) the Sultan of Brunei, ordered Pengiran Muda Hashim in 1839 to restore order and it was during this time that James Brooke visited Sarawak. Pangeran Muda Hashim initially requested assistance but James Brooke refused. Brooke was by then an independent adventurer with his own ship having left military employment in India after recovering from serious battle injuries. In 1841, James Brooke paid another visit to Sarawak and this time he agreed to assist Pangeran Muda Hashim. The success in defeating the pirates and insurgents led to the signing of a treaty in 1841 ceding as a reward Sarawak and Serian to James Brooke. Thereafter, on 24 September 1841, Pangeran Muda Hashim bestowed the title Rajah on James Brooke. He effectively became the Rajah of Sarawak and founded the White Rajah Dynasty of Sarawak, later extending his administration through an agreement with the Sultan of Brunei. The uniqueness of this arrangement in becoming a Rajah without any intent of colonising or imperialism mesmerised the British public's imagination and gave further impetus to exploration and rise to "man who would be king" adventurers in exotic locales.

James Brooke, who was to become the first White Rajah, received a sizeable tract of land from the Sultan. As time went on Sarawak's size would increase tremendously as more territory was leased or annexed from the Sultanate of Brunei.

The evolution of Malaysia

Japanese invasion

During World War II, Sarawak, as a British protectorate, was brought into the war against Nazi Germany, though as in World War I it had little direct involvement with the conflict aside from providing war materials. Resources for the defence of Sarawak, which was known to be a strategically important goal in the event of an expected Japanese attack, were not available because they were all needed for the defence of the home country. When the Pacific War began in December 1941, Sarawak was brought into the war against Japan on the side of the Allies as part of the British Empire. Sarawak depended upon British protection as she had very limited armed forces, although the Sarawak Rangers were mobilised. In the late 1930s, an air field was constructed near Kuching which could be used as a base for the Royal Air Force in the event of war with Japan, but this proved to be of little use due to the lack of British aircraft available in the Far East. A detachment of Indian Army infantry (2/15th Punjabi regiment) and some anti-aircraft guns were futilely dispatched to Sarawak^[1] to support the Sarawak Rangers, as Sarawak was quickly overrun due to the lack of adequate protection. Rajah Vyner was visiting Australia at the time of the invasion and was unable to return to Sarawak until its liberation in 1945, despite his attempts to return and launch commando raids to fight the Japanese in the jungle. Sarawak's small merchant marine was used by the British in the Far Eastern campaign, with the sinking of the SS Vyner Brooke resulting in the infamous Banka Island massacre. A government in exile was formed, although it proved ineffectual due to the lack of contact with Sarawak. Sarawak, along with the rest of Borneo, was liberated by the Australian Army in 1945.

Cession to the Crown Colony of Sarawak

After World War II, Vyner Brooke ceded Sarawak to the Colonial Office for a sizeable pension for him and his three daughters. Charles' nephew, Anthony Brooke, who as designated heir bore the title of Rajah Muda, initially opposed cession to the Crown along with a majority of the native members of the Council Negri, or parliament. Duncan Stewart, the second British governor of Sarawak, was assassinated in the resulting unrest. As of now there is no serious movement for the restoration of the monarchy.

Demographics

Sarawak is notably different from peninsular Malaysia and even Sabah in that its ethnic groups are more varied due to the large proportion of tribal peoples such as Dayaks. Chinese migration was encouraged at various times by the Brookes.

Government

The three White Rajahs of Sarawak were:

• Sir James Brooke (1841–1868)
• Sir Charles Anthony Johnson Brooke (1868–1917)
• Sir Charles Vyner Brooke (1917–1946)

When James Brooke first arrived in Sarawak it was governed as a vassal state of the Sultanate of Brunei. When he assumed control of the original area around Kuching in the 1840s much of the system of government was based on the ineffective Bruneian model. James set about reforming the government and eventually creating a civil service known as the Sarawak Service which recruited European, mainly British officers to run district outstations. He invited the Anglican Mission to set up church and schools, the diocese of Borneo with its own Archbishop. Particularly, the mission through Father McDougall set up the St. Thomas Anglican School, ( See:SMK St. Thomas) in 1848, still the oldest established European school in Southeast Asia. Thus, the residents became exposed to and trained in many British and European methods and culture. However, James retained many of the customs and symbols of neighbouring Malay monarchies and combined them with his own style of absolute rule. James Brooke was very particular in ensuring the local customs and beliefs of local indigenous races like the Dayaks, Ibans, etc. were maintained and respected. As the Rajah, he had the power to introduce laws and also acted as chief judge in Kuching. He selected his successor, his nephew, Charles Brooke who became the Second Rajah. Charles Brooke was responsible for acquiring more land from the Sultan of Brunei which basically led to the land size of Sarawak today.

He was succeeded by Charles Vyner Brooke as the Third Rajah. While the manner of his departure was controversial, Charles Vyner nonetheless instituted significant political reforms, including ending the absolute rule of the Rajah in 1941 ahead of the Japanese invasion by granting new powers to the Council Negri.

Military

Sarawak Rangers

The Sarawak Rangers were a para-military force founded in 1872 by the second Rajah of Sarawak, Charles Anthony Johnson Brooke. They evolved from the fortmen which were raised to defend Kuching in 1846. The Sarawak Rangers were first commanded by a William Henry Rodway (1836-1924), a trainee dentist whose only military training had been in the Torquay Volunteers when he was recruited to Kuching in 1862. The later became skilled in jungle warfare and general policing duties, being equipped with various western rifles, cannons and native weaponry. This small force also manned a series of forts around the country, performed ceremonial duties and acted as the Rajahs' personal guard.

Aside from protecting Sarawak's borders, they were used to fight any rebels and were engaged in a number of campaigns during their history. The Sarawak Rangers were disbanded for a few years in the 1930s, only to be reformed and mobilised for the Second World War in which they attempted to defend Sarawak from Japanese invasion in 1942 at the start of the Pacific War. After the abdication of Charles Vyner Brooke in 1946, the Sarawak Rangers became a colonial unit under direct British control and saw action in both the Malayan Emergency and the Borneo Confrontation.

Battle off Mukah

Jolly Bachelor engaging pirates off T.Datu, Sarawak, 1843

In November 1862 two Sarawakian warships under the Rajah Muda, Captain Brooke Brooke, attacked a force of Moro Pirates in six large proas when they raided the town of Mukah. Over the course of two or three hours, Brooke with his steamer Rainbow, and his gunboat Jolly Bachelor, sank four of the pirate ships either by cannon fire or by ramming them. Another was damaged by near hits and abandoned by her crew. In the end only a few Sarawakians were killed or wounded while the Moros lost several killed or wounded.^[2]

Economy

By and large the Brookes pursued a policy of paternalism, aimed at protecting the 'native peoples' from capitalist exploitation but also preventing the same levels of development which were evident in some other parts of the British Empire. While James laid much of the groundwork for the expansion of Sarawak, it was his nephew Charles who was the great builder, both in terms of public buildings, forts and extending the borders of the state.

The Brookes were determined to prevent the peoples of Sarawak from being exploited by Western business interests and formed The Borneo Company Limited to assist in managing the economy. The Borneo Company Limited was also to provide military support to the Brookes during events such as the Chinese Rebellion when one of the company Steamers, The Sir James Brooke was used to assist in the recapture of Kuching.

The architectural legacy of the dynasty can be seen in many of the country's nineteenth century and colonial heritage buildings. In Kuching these include The Astana, or governor's residence, the Old Sarawak Museum, Fort Margherita, the Square Fort, the Old Courthouse and Brooke Memorial. Several key buildings from the Brooke period have been demolished, including the offices and warehouses of Borneo Company.

The country started issuing its own coinage from 1841 when it issued a one keping coin. This was later demonetised and cents were introduced from 1863 onward, in denominations ranging from a quarter cent to 50 cents. These were initially subdivisions of the Spanish dollar which was legal tender in the country, until a Sarawak dollar was introduced.

The dollar was the currency of Sarawak from 1858 to 1953. It was subdivided into 100 cents. The dollar remained at par with the Straits dollar and its successor the Malayan dollar, the currency of Malaya and Singapore, from its introduction until both currencies were replaced by the Malaya and British Borneo dollar in 1953.^[3]

Culture

Modern Kuching still boasts many businesses and attractions which capitalise upon the era of the White Rajahs like The Astana, Fort Margherita, St. Thomas's Cathedral and School, and the world famous Sarawak Museum. The Brooke Dockyard, which was founded in the period of Rajah Charles, is still in operation, as is the original Sarawak Museum. The James Brooke Café and the "Royalist", a pub named after Rajah James's Schooner, pay tribute to the Brookes.

Blog and Tweet 25/9/2018 Breaking up and dissolving

Blog and Tweet 25/9/2018      Breaking up and dissolving

     Has there been any laws allowing people to fight for independence since time immemorial?  There have been countries one after another becoming independent.  For the late fifty years, there are 100 countries declaring independent. 

        I strongly believe that Sarawak will become an independent country peacefully one day because based on MA63, Sarawak and Sabab are trust territories and we are supposed to have the full autonomous power for everything.  But the domineering crowned Malayan political clowns have taken all except some rights.  They have colonised us.  Yes, they have committed crimes of breaches to MA63.  Based on the Declaration of Decolonisation of the United Nations  on 14 December, 1960, we Sarawakians can vote Sarawak to exit the federation of Malaysia for good so that we can take the full ownership and control of everything in Sarawak and free ourselves from the constant plundering, exploitation, robbing, bullying, harassment and threat.  The wide-awareness of the people is the key to the door of independence.

      If we have declared independent some day, I strongly believe that Sabah, our nextdoor neighbour will follow suit because I don’t see why they don’t want to be free from the tether of the Malayan colonial power.

      I guess that the map of the potato-like Peninsular Malaya (I had never seen it as a potato until someone pin-pointed it out.) might undergo some changes.   Johore has been waiting for the chance to break off from the grip of the federal government which is too centralised and authoritative to enable the proper development of all the 11 states in Peninsular Malaya.  If Johore were an independent state, I believe, it would develop so much better than it is now. 

        For the past 55 years, the centralised federal government have only benefitted those near to the centre of power.  With the convenience of internet, we can check who and who have become millionaires or billionaires in the process at the expense of the states, especially Kelantan and Trengganu.  The territories of Sarawak and Sabah have been “the ATMs” for the centralised federal government to withdraw at will.

       I strongly believe that if Kelantan and Trengganu were free from the grip of the centralised federal government, they would perform much, much better.  Singapore should serve as a very good example to all.  Small is beautiful and wonderful. 

land size of

Sarawak                    124,451 km²

Norway                     385,203 km²

Kelantan                      15,099 km²

Terengganu state       13,035 km²

Johore state               19,102 km²

Singapore                   719.9 km²

        If the centralised federal government were dissolved, it would do more good than harm to different states in the Peninsular Malaya.  Then, there are 11 countries to co-operate and collaborate in one way or another for the common good and prosperity. 

        When Sarawak and Sabah becomes independent some day, there is no more free money to withdraw at will.  Is it every state in Peninsular Malaya has to be more independent financially and politically to survive?

freemalaysiatoday.com

IDEAS: State-owned enterprises deserve further scrutiny

FMT Reporters

PETALING JAYA: The Institute for Democracy and Economic Affairs (IDEAS) has launched a book titled “Minister of Finance Incorporated: Ownership and Control of Corporate Malaysia”, which offers a deep analysis of government-linked investment companies (GLICs) and their ownership and control of Bursa Malaysia’s top 100 publicly-listed enterprises.
At the event to launch the book yesterday, author Professor Edmund Terence Gomez described the pyramid structure controlling corporate Malaysia.
Gomez, who is an IDEAS senior fellow and political economy lecturer at Universiti Malaya, said his research found that most of the country’s largest corporations are controlled by seven GLICs.
“All these GLICs in turn fall under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Finance.
“The extent of the GLICs involvement in the economy can be seen from their ownership of 35 public-listed companies that constituted an estimated 42% of the total market capitalisation of all listed companies in 2013,” IDEAS said in a statement today.
IDEAS also revealed that the research by Gomez showed that through these 35 public-listed companies, the seven GLICs are ultimately linked with about 68,300 companies.
IDEAS chief executive Wan Saiful Wan Jan said the research also revealed the extensive reach of the finance minister.
“There is a remarkable concentration of political and economic power in the office of Prime Minister Najib Razak, by virtue of him also being the finance minister.
“Through the Minister of Finance Incorporated (MoF Inc) and six other GLICs, his economic reach is phenomenal,” Wan Saiful said.
He also expressed his concern that the fact that the finance minister is also responsible for the appointment and removal of GLIC directors could “undermine the trusted system of checks and balances and lead to abuse of power”.
“It is a huge incentive for any prime minister to continue appointing himself as the finance minister.
If we continue with this system, the two roles will never be separated because the prime minister will always fear losing such a huge control of the economy,” Wan Saiful said, adding that the real issue with corporate governance of our state-owned enterprises is that too much power is concentrated in one hand.
Calling for the “system” to be improved, Wan Saiful said there was no need to reinvent the wheel, but to instead look to the many international standards that the country’s administration could follow.
“I strongly urge the government to look into the OECD Guidelines on the Governance of State-Owned Enterprises which I think provides a good enough framework for us to start with,” he said.

多多陈[Sticker]TanToTo 9:39 AMhttps://dayakdaily.com/s4s-believes-malayan-politicians-trying-to-strip-away-all-the-rights-of-sarawak-sabah/

S4S believes Malayan politicians trying to strip away all the rights of Sarawak, Sabah

September 19, 2018

KUCHING, Sept 19: Sarawak for Sarawakians (S4S) today chided former Tourism Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Nazri Abdul Aziz for setting the condition that Sarawak and Sabah must give up their immigration autonomy before they can be accorded equal status.

S4S spokesperson Tan Kok Chiang opined that this was an attempt by Putrajaya to further strip away the rights of Sarawak and Sabah.

“The rights of Sarawak and Sabah have eroded over the years, and there is already not much left. All that we have is the immigration autonomy.

“And yet, these politicians, whether in Barisan Nasional (BN) or Pakatan Harapan (PH), are still trying hard to try to take away of what is left of our autonomy instead of honouring the MA63 (Malaysian Agreement 1963),” Tan told a press conference at a local coffee shop here today.

He said irrespective of whether Nazri’s statement was a coincidence or unintentional, it showed that the federal government, regardless of who is in power, would make the same move, which is to find excuses not to return the rights of Sarawak and Sabah while at the same time make every attempt to further erode the rights of the two states.

“What is most disappointing is that when the issues crop up, Sarawak PH leaders do not defend Sarawak but stand aside silently and let their federal counterpart carry on with what they are doing.

“Before May 9 (14th general election), Sarawakians voted for PH with the hope that they would return Sarawak’s rights and resources as promised. Yet, they (Sarawak PH leaders) do nothing for Sarawak,” lamented Tan.

He noted that ever since PH took over Putrajaya, Sarawak PH leaders showed they had no say in making decisions concerning issues such as oil and gas royalties, education and MA63.

Tan said Sarawakians were now left with no political choice. On one hand, Sarawakians did not have much faith with the ruling Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) while on the other, they have lost confidence in Sarawak PH, which is allegedly under the control of Putrajaya.

“We are worried that if we support Sarawak PH, we will end up like Sabah, where Sarawak may lose its only remaining right of immigration autonomy,” said Tan.

He pointed out that whether its BN or PH, their only intention is to “colonise” Sarawak for the latter’s rich resources. — DayakDaily

英范 11:13 PM[马哈迪的财富都是不义之财 家族所窃取的国家财富超过400亿美金 | 真相网 : http://liketruth.com/?p=83412]

马哈迪的财富都是不义之财 家族所窃取的国家财富超过400亿美金

24/01/2018

（真相网／陈伟国）被林吉祥漂白后的马哈迪，现在以清官自居，令人啼笑皆非，他在部落格问道“可否用不義之财朝聖？我對伊斯蘭有很多疑問。”他質問，若把偷回來的錢，作爲朝聖用途，在此情況下，是否合理？

是否有人把偷回來的錢，作爲朝聖用途，这个问题让他针对的对象去解答，但马哈迪本身就是一个因为拥有巨额不义之财而被国际媒体批判的滥权，搞裙带关系假公济私的领袖，他竟然厚颜无耻大谈“不义之财”，正是牛不知角弯，马不知脸长的写照。

行动党网路兵团在5.05大选前，努力散播一份由张丹枫撰写的文件，题为《窃国大鳄马哈迪的真相》，大爆美国股汇炒家索罗斯揭露马哈迪在任期间，滥权敛财的一系列丑闻，向华裔选民宣扬马哈迪是如何通过栽培朋党掏空国库。文中直批马哈迪掌政的22年里，国家表面是进步了，社会是发展了；但是各族之间却比70年代之前更分化了。更重要的，是大马的国债不断飙升，国库里原本丰盛的存款也不停的被人使用【五鬼搬运】手法运往海外然后蒸发得无影无踪。

行动党网络兵团大事宣扬的【五鬼搬运】，是正义之财，还是不义之财？窃国大鳄马哈迪是否应该解释一下人民印象已经深刻的【五鬼搬运】法，向人民交代，国库里原本丰盛的存款被谁不停的运往海外然后蒸发得无影无踪？

根据【维基解密】的报导，世界上最有钱的人其实是前埃及总统穆巴拉克；身家估计高达两千亿美金；排名第二的是已故利比亚总统卡达菲，估计身家高达1,500亿美金，而排名第三的，就是马来西亚前首相马哈迪，估计身家不会少过1千亿美金。

《窃国大鳄马哈迪的真相》写道：他掌政的22年里，总共令国家不见了多少钱？有经济学者曾说，过去那22年里，被运往海外神秘消失的大马人民血汗钱不会少过8千亿。而国际货币炒家索罗斯也公开揭露表示，马哈迪个人及家族所窃取的国家财富超过400亿美金！折合马币超过1,200亿令吉！

马哈迪地一家人多次去朝圣，还不是用不义之财？索罗斯说：据我所知，你在国内推行的任何大型发展计划，你个人都会抽取20%的佣金！你贪污所得的赃款都被隐秘的转移到海外；你在日本就拥有许多昂贵的地皮和不动产！你三个孩子，每个身家都在80亿美元以上！.

索罗斯说：当然，你这些财富都是不义之财，都是通过贪污得来的。你就是马来西亚的马可斯第二！你利用你的身份不断敛财，使你成为身家上千亿的世界首富！

马哈迪个人及家族所窃取的国家财富超过1,200亿令吉！马哈迪本身就是马来西亚的“不义之财”之父。

林吉祥跟马哈迪冰释前嫌，无非想跟马哈迪讨一些面包屑，分享不义之财。否则，为何林吉祥如今对马哈迪的一切贪污腐败，滥权徇私罪过噤若寒蝉，不敢过问？

Share the knowledge!

Permalink

Post navigation

独裁者声称在位太久变贪腐 马哈迪自认没更好首相人选 魏家祥再挖隧道丑闻 林冠英避答不敢负责

• • 安华扬言希盟不排除跟巫统合作 原来支持希盟等于支持巫统
  • 认为不会贏的希盟大选承诺” 欺骗了全国选民
  • 老马延续巫統鬥爭宗旨 举對抗騷乱论推行种族政策
  • 委种族极端份子领导选举改革 "政治改革"被马哈迪阉割
  • 最低薪金只提高至1050 希盟失信羞辱全国劳工
  • 欲盖弥彰滥权撤贪污案自保 希盟干预司法保护涉贪高官
  • 希盟执政下令拆中文招牌   行动党变质辱族丧权
  • 敦马要以宏願學校同化华裔 行动党竟然沉默及妥协
  • 马哈迪安华只注重巫裔课题 狗改不了吃屎遗忘“全民”
  • 拒绝废除官方机密法令 希盟竞选承诺一再跳票

—————  2018-9-23  —————

Yeo 9:04 AMDo you guys know that there is NO Oil Refineries in Kelantan, Sabah, Sarawak?

Do you guys know that there is one Oil Refinery (Shell) in Lutong, Miri but has to be close due to loses and thus making it impractical to still be put in operation 10 years ago?

Do you guys know that Malaysia's first oil well was discovered by Shell on Canada Hill in Miri, Sarawak in 1910. Shell's Miri No. 1 was spudded on 10 August that year, and began producing 83 barrels per day in December?

Do you guys know that we only have LNG Plant in Bintulu while the government has plan to built RM62 Billion Oil Refinery Plant in Johore, yes in Johore, how ironic is that?

Do you guys know that Terenganu has their Oil Refinery Plant

Do you guys know that oil and gas contractors from Sabah, Sarawak only allocated of 30% of various jobs and contracts (Downstream) by Petronas?

Do you guys know that Sarawak and Sabah produced petroleum earlier than Terengganu and Kelantan. History of Petroleum in Miri dated back to the early 1900’s?

Sabah and Sarawak are the big oil and gas producing states and yet we do not benefit as what we rightfully deserved?

This is not fair for Sabah,Sarawak especially when there are no development projects allocated by Petronas in Sabah,Sarawak. Our oil and gas has been siphoned away and exported

We should be looking at some positive development programs to help the Sabah, Sarawak economy and not by simply shipping out our valuable crude oil to a foreign refinery first, then we buy back the refined petrol at a high price. Don't wait until our crude oil and natural petroleum gas to run dry, then only consider to set up the related oil and gas industry.

Anwar Ibrahim says Pakatan Rakyat will give 20% royalty to Sarawak Sabah while Dr. Jeffrey says it should be 50%. It is not up to Federal government to tell us how much they would like to give us of our own money earned through our own resource. It is up to Sarawak and Sabah to suggest how much to give the Federal Government!

For example, why can’t we get a good 4 lane trunk road for Sarawak? Air travel is not cheap in Sarawak. In Malaya such road is a norm. And as I said, do not come and tell me that Sarawak is sparsely populated and therefor difficult to develop because we have income from oil and gas if it is allocated fairly to meet Sarawak need.

What constitute the 5% royalty repatriation? Is it from revenue generated from our petroleum? Then who among us are sitting within Petronas management to oversee this? This is just like the sawit JV with big Malayan companies. They farm our land, yet not one of us sits as director or managers within those companies?

Not only we’re lacking in terms of infrastructures but Sabah, Sarawak is one of the poorest state in Malaysia? Dont talk about income per capita as the big gap betwen the rich and poor and if im not mistaken, Kelantan is among the poorest state too.

How ironic is that? We are RICH but yet we are POOR so my question is, who BENEFITS from all this?

Who own the biggest oil companies in Malaysia? Scomi- is Abdullah Bidawi’s son and Kencana is Tun Mahathir’s son. I am sure Najib is already creating another for his son after he changed the CEO of Petronas. It becomes apparent that Sarawak Sabah oil and gas is made the ‘fixed deposit” of Prime Ministers income through their children.

But Sarawak Government are totally silence on this issue. The BN Government continue to try and build good relationship with Federal Govt based on losses of income to Sarawak. What is the point? We hear of our state government begging for money to develop Sarawak when it should be rightfully in our hand, isn’t that comical?

Last but not least, the other shocking revelation that has come to my knowledge is that 80% of the oil produced by Petronas is not sold directly to the world market but is channelled through 6 OPTION HOLDERS who obtain the supply from Petronas at well below market prices (1974 prices to be exact). These option holders or agents are the ones reaping the benefits and huge profits in the oil price hikes.

Ps : Should i rant more everyday to wake and whack you guys up? SIGH!



https://pengayau.wordpress.com/2012/08/31/do-you-guys-know-that-there-is-no-oil-refineries-in-kelantan-sabah-sarawak/

我要独立 9:07 AM2美國中情局披露：

組成“马来西亚”的真正意图

砂拉越沙巴“领导人”為了蠅頭小利而出賣油田与領海

砂拉越愛國活動家Zulfaqar Sa'adi告诉FMT，该文件揭露了1969年砂朥越如何失去领海,同時并向联邦政府奉送丰富的自然资源的真实故事。

这个五页的文件，被认为是在“1966年大陆棚架法案”，修正並把婆羅州兩邦海洋納入該法案之前的几个星期内写的。

他指出，吉隆坡被认为是试图堅持其权力，以便利用所有砂沙三海里外的海上资源。

Zulfaqar指出，尽管马来亚在1957年取得了独立，但联邦政府只认为，只有马来西亚组建后，再和新加坡脫離之后，才能制定修改＂1966年大陆棚架法”。

“阅读中央情报局的文件，令人怀疑马来亚联邦政府是否，為了掌握马来西亚联邦政府，而制定的政治局势(合組大馬），以确保它能够利用婆羅卅地区丰富的自然资源。”

他还回顾了马来西亚第一任总理東姑阿都拉曼（Tunku Abdul Rahman）的话，他曽公开表示，他想要沙巴和砂朥越，当时也包括文莱，因为领地是资源丰富的，而曾經說過“这将有利财政，他們有油“。

根據Zulfaqar他的研究，说马来亚政府当时利用了英国戰後對殖民地的失勢，而英方為了保持对婆罷州兩邦的义务，及维护其在新加坡的利益，强制实行包括所有三个领土在内的〈合并計畫〉。

“我不是说这是故意的，但如果没有新加坡的话，马来亚可以自由利用沙巴和砂朥越的资源。

“因為新加坡将强烈反对马来亚将”大陆棚架法“延伸到其他三个领土的任何企图。（因為保括新加坡海域，新加坡將㑹是帶頭起哄的）＂

“所以在新加坡分手之后，联邦政府几乎马上把它的计划付诸行动。”

然而，Zulfaqar告诉FMT，该文件最令人震惊的一个方面是，砂朥越领导人当时是知道马来亚的企图是違反协议的（1963年馬來西亞協議）。

当时的看守政府，砂垃越政府，在吉隆坡推翻了卡隆宁康(砂朥越首任首長）后，坚决反对将该法延伸到沙巴和沙捞越。

然而，吉隆坡告诉砂朥越，这是接受民主而明智的决定，因为沙巴也同意这一点。

他说，联邦政府在以后再接触沙巴政府时也采取了同样的理由，他说沙巴应该接受，砂朥越已经同意了。“

中央情报局的文件显示，使用“马来西亚协议”，代理国家总检察长杰米里·塞尔木（Jemuri Serjan）概述了砂朥越在领海上的权利，这是1954年通过委员会命令颁布并由“1958年石油开采条例”进一步确定的。

“他辯稱，马来西亚”宪法“第1条当时是根据”1963年马来西亚协定“（1976年修订）提供了砂朥越领土的定义，其中包括大陆棚架。

他说：“这是新的资料，因为到今天为止，我们不知道砂朥越政府在处理联邦政府事務时,是否已经明明白白，这整个法律文件?”

该解密文件还指出，砂朥越政府实际上，可以根据1966年“大陆棚架法”对吉隆坡采取反對行动，反對其利用“紧急狀況”下的 权力接管砂朥越的领海。

相反，他表示，砂朥越政府接受了吉隆坡的主張，作出了让步，几年之后，他通过“1976年石油发展法案”，向自己国家提供了一项名为“5％主權稅(5％ loyalty），並以现金支付。
最后，吉隆坡能够对三公里以外海洋的资源建立其权力，可耻地利用其“紧急狀況”的权力和弱势的砂朥越看守政府而实现其目标。“

然而，Zulfaqar认为，現在随着新的信息和解密的文件（50年後文件解密）突然浮現，再次熱血沸騰，回顾马来西亚形成的历史，立志把事情辦好。

“我希望我们那些最近去伦敦的砂朥越律师能够发现更多的信息，这些信息可以让我们更清楚地了解马来西亚的形成，从而有助于保护砂朥越的权利。”他总结的说。　

多多陈[Sticker]TanToTo 3:17 PM【马来西亚建国过程，问与答】

55年的今天，1963年马来西亚契约被修正了！

在经过两年的多方各国各邦代表谈判，柯伯德委委员会“民意调查”，最后透过跨政府委员会筹备一个新国家“马来西亚”的宪法基础。1963年7月9日，英国，马来亚联邦，新加坡，砂劳越和沙巴代表签署了“1963年马来西亚契约”。当时顺应东姑阿都拉曼的要求，大马契约将成立马来西亚日订于1963年8月31日。

可是当时基于印尼和菲律宾向联合国提出反对马来西亚的成立，联合国必须亲自派团来砂劳越和北婆罗洲（沙巴）确证民意所向。马来西亚契约内定的8月31日马来西亚成立日必须被迫修改成1963年9月16日。这次为了要修正1963年契约，五方签署代表：英国，马来亚联邦，新加坡，砂劳越以及沙巴都必须再次齐聚一堂，一致同意和签署修正马来西亚成立日。

1963年8月28日马来西亚契约经历了第一次，也是唯一一次的修正。五方一致同意，共同签署了修正马来西亚的成立日为1963年9月16日。大马契约是五方签署的国际契约，内文没有提供允许任何一方可以自行修改的条文。唯一修正的途径就是五方必须一致同意和共同签署修正方可。

按照以上1963年马来西亚契约的条文规定，我想回答以下问题：

（1）问：马来西亚国会能够自行修改1963年马来西亚契约的规定吗？
答：不能。马来西亚国会只能修改马来西亚法律。无权修正，取消，删除任何国际契约。

（2）问：那么为何1976年马来西亚国会可以将砂劳越和沙巴降格成为13州之一呢？
答：虽然国会可以透过2/3国会投票通过修改任何联邦宪法，可是该宪法修正将砂沙降格为州是直接抵触了1963年马来西亚契约。按照国际承认的大马契约，砂劳越和沙巴永远都是马来西亚建国三邦之一，而不是13州属之一。

（3）问：如果马来西亚国会修宪降格砂劳越和沙巴成为州属是得到砂劳越或沙巴的同意呢？
答：也不行！就算砂劳越和沙巴自己也同意降格从邦变州，也一样是抵触国际法，无法获联合国承认。因为唯一能够降格砂劳越和沙巴的方法，是需要按照1963年8月28日的做法：大马契约五方签署代表：英国，马来亚联邦，新加坡，砂劳越以及沙巴都必须再次齐聚一堂，一致同意和签署修正将砂沙从建国三邦之一地位，降格成为马来西亚13州之一！

（4）问：新加坡之后在1965离开马来西亚，没有五方签署是否会导致大马契而失效呢？
答：大马契约是信托契约不同于一般契约。1963年英国殖民政府将砂沙新信托给马来亚。"to vest in" 之后，1965年马来西亚政府和新加坡政府透过双方同意：马政府将主权和管辖权交还给新加坡，新加坡同意自己独立成为主权国离开马来西亚。因此大马契约内的成员邦权利条文没有修正，成立的马来西亚还存在。

这4个问与答简单明瞭回答大家疑问，可以看到马来亚单方面的更改大马契约，为的是殖民砂沙和得到石油资源。

#请分享给更多砂人知道
#请把你的朋友拉进砂拉越人民之声让他也了解更多砂的权益