What is Grammar after all?
Grammar is all about forms
and functions. Of course, it is also
about punctuation. Therefore, grammar is
like a skeleton that support a body.
Without it, the body just crumples down into a mass like a dough. Grammar is also like a mould which gives the shape.
Hence a good knowledge of
grammar does not guarantee you to speak on any specific topic. To speak on any specific topic, you need the
knowledge or to be well-informed of the concerned topic. For example, if you know nothing about the mole
rat, can you talk about this animal?
Hence, being able to
engage yourself in the conversation or not should not mix up with the
knowledge of grammar. Those who advocate
communicative English to learn English claims that grammar is not to be learnt deductively or
explicitly. Am I right? Hence learning grammar is more or less ditched
out from most of the English classroom scenario.
In the
federation of Malaysia, there are only ten marks allocated to the context
tested on grammar in the PT3 public examination.
I wonder if there is any school in the whole-wide world still teach
grammar item by item. Then allocate at
least 30 marks on grammar. Ever since the introduction of communicative
English twenty over years ago, grammar learning has been marginalised and
losing out in the English learning environment.
Well, are
the students who have gone through this process able to communicate better in
speaking and writing English?
No comments:
Post a Comment