theborneopost.com

PBB leaders slam Sabah activist for MA63 remarks | Borneo Post Online

Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar

KUCHING: Two key members of Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) have hit out at Sabah activist Zainnal Ajamain, who has again portrayed himself as a ‘Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) expert’ and blamed MPs from PBB for last year’s failed amendment to the Article 1 (2) of the Federal Constitution.
Santubong MP Datuk Seri Wan Junaidi Tuanku Jaafar regards Zainnal as being disrespectful to Sarawakian leaders, in connection with the latter’s comments aired over a YouTube video uploaded on Jan 29 – deemed as ‘giving Sarawakian leaders a lecture about the MA63’.
“He (Zainnal) seems to portray that he has an exclusive monopoly of understanding the meaning and interpretation of all the contents in the Federal Constitution.
“Please – we Sarawakians can manage our own state without any advice from the people who belittle and debase us like that,” Wan Junaidi said in a statement.
He said as a loyal member of the PBB, which is a component of the ruling Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) coalition, he would stand by the party leadership and whatever decision that the leaders had made.
“Honestly, I simply cannot and do not find it possible to make Sarawak or Sabah, or Sarawak and Sabah, ‘equal partners’ with Peninsular Malaysia simply by introducing and passing that April 2019 amendment.
“That’s why I took the stand of not supporting the amendment – it is still my stand.”
Wan Junaidi said he began his interest in the documents pertaining to the formation of Malaysia when he wrote ‘Evolusi Parlimen dan Speaker Parlimen’ in 2008, and not in 2016 as alleged by Zainnal.
He recalled that when all the GPS MPs made the decision for not supporting the amendment to Article 1(2) of Federal Constitution in April 2019, they were told from the speeches and the discussions that they had to restore the rights of Sarawak.

Zainnal Ajamain

“My question is – what rights that Article 1(2) gives, even in its form or format of 1963?
“Thorough examination of the Federal Constitution of Malaysia and all the related instruments of Malaysia Agreement, for example, the Cobbold Commission Report, the Inter-Governmental Committee (IGC) Report, MA63, the Act of Malaysia 1963 (UK), Act of Malaysia 1963 (Malaya), and the Federal Constitution Malaysia.
“Clearly there was no ‘equal partnership’ in them.”
Wan Junaidi believed that the terms used by the minister and Pakatan Harapan (PH) debaters in Dewan Rakyat for the amendment were wrong.
    He pointed out that members could not mislead Parliament and the GPS MPs were not able to support the amendment because of the numerous misrepresentations.
    Meanwhile, PBB information chief Dato Idris Buang said Zainnal was missing the point in the essence of the constitution amendment to restore Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia.
    The Muara Tuang assemblyman said Zainnal overlooked the importance of throwing out any ambiguity found in the original MA63, as well as the 1976 amended version, if such a phrase ‘pursuant to Malaysia Agreement 1963’ was not inserted.
“What he says in the video is only a half-right, half-wrong view,” he said in a statement.
     Idris pointed out that the flaws in Zainnal’s argument could not be supported to suit Sarawak’s interest appertaining to the spirit of the seminal and formative documents such as MA63, the IGC Report and so forth, which made the Federation of Malaysia.
     Idris reiterated Sarawak’s stand for a more comprehensive amendment to the Federal Constitution by acknowledging MA63 including the interpretation of the ‘Federation’, as well as safeguarding the legislative and executive powers of Sarawak, sources of revenues, special grants and financial autonomy.
“We must insist on what was passed by the State Legislative Assembly via a motion tabled by de facto Law Minister Datuk Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali last year.
“We just stick to our guns and insist on the insertion of, inter alia, the words ‘Sabah and Sarawak pursuant to MA63’ to their proposal on Article 1(2), and also to Article 160(2) on the definition of ‘The Federation’,” added Idris.

My comments:
       Zainnal who imagines that he knows better should behave himself and bow his head in shame for playing a charlatan.   He makes a fool of himself only when he knows so little about the laws relating to MA63 which is widely believed to be null and void from the very beginning with close reference to the Maritius-Chagos case.   What amendment to make and bark about when MA63 is illegal in every sense.  Sharifah Hasidah, Wan Junaidi and Idris Buang are all qualified lawyers and who are you, Zainnal telling everything half-truth trumpeting in such a manner only bring shame and humiliation to yourself?

theborneopost.com

‘Don’t repeat abstention during re-tabling of Article 1(2) amendment’ | Borneo Post Online

Zainnal stresses a point while showing a section of the Federal Constitution.

KUCHING: An activist from Sabah is appealing to Sarawak MPs to support the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution to restore the status of the two Borneo states as equal partners of Peninsular Malaysia, when it is re-tabled at the Dewan Rakyat this March.

      Zainnal Ajamain expressed his hope that there will be no repeat of Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) MPs choosing to abstain from voting as what had happened when the Constitution (Amendment) Bill 2019 was tabled in Parliament on April 9 last year.
“The Sabah State Legislative Assembly (DUN) has passed a resolution to table this (Bill) again in the coming parliamentary session.
 “I hope that Sarawak (MPs) will not repeat what they did on April 9, 2019 because this is for the rakyat (people) and not for politics,” he told a press conference here yesterday.
     Zainnal, who is also Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) advisor to the Sabah government, stressed that the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution is all about Sabah and Sarawak’s rights, adding he could not fathom why Sarawak decided to abstain from voting in the first place.
“They wanted to amend the word ‘federation’ under Article 160 of the Federal Constitution but the problem is Article 160 is not part and parcel of Annex A of MA63.
“This means that it is something new and you want to change something new on that day itself. You can’t do that because you have to go through the process of negotiation,” he said.
     He also wondered whether Sarawak is ‘trying to play games’ and wanted to ‘drag out the issue’. The activist also cited an amendment of the Federal Constitution that came to force in 1976 where Article 1(2) says: ‘The States of the Federation shall be Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Sabah, Sarawak, Selangor and Terengganu.’
      He said when Malaysia was formed on Sept 16, 1963, it read: ‘the States of the Federation shall be – (a) the States of Malaya, namely, Johore, Kedah, Kelantan, Malacca, Negeri Sembilan, Pahang, Penang, Perak, Perlis, Selangor and Terengganu; and (b) the Borneo States, namely Sabah and Sarawak; and (c) the State of Singapore.’
‘The State of Singapore’ was dropped after Singapore’s departure from the federation on Aug 9, 1965.
“Here, territory is important because as mentioned in Clause 2, the State of Malaya is one territory and Borneo States is another territory.
“As it is now, we are all under one territory and therefore must share everything with Malaya. So how can Sarawak, for instance, claim its oil and gas without it being in its territory? At the end of the day we lose everything.
“So why is Sarawak not supporting the amendment (Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution) and they want to make changes knowing that making changes will require them to renegotiate?”
He said if Sarawak wants to claims its rights on oil and gas, its territory must therefore be defined.
“We cannot claim our oil and gas when we are under Malaya territory. They will exert the same right.
“What we want now is to revert back to MA63 as it was provided (in the 1965-1976 version) and this is part of the reason why I would like the Sarawak government not to repeat its performance back in April last year,” he said, adding that when it comes to MA63, Sabah and Sarawak have to work together.

My comments:
I think that Zainnal has lost his very sense as a socialist to say that Sarawak MP should have complied to the Amendment on 9 April, 2019.  I wonder what he is now.  He behaves like a run-dog to PH government.  He  should not be considered a socialist anymore as he has lost all the qualities befitted.  Oh, he is now the advisor of the Sabah government.  I think that he is too eager to show off and for recognition.  He looks so funny now.
       He just refused to recognise the fact that MA63 is null and void from the very beginning.  I wonder what amendment to make and bark about.  It is really a curse having this kind of Sabahan who is ever ready to betray Sabahans for own benefits and interests.  He is not a lawyer to talk about laws as if he were an expert..  He is like a self-claimed doctor with no professional qualification.

限首500摩托骑士．林财耀周六派免费添油固本

---

2020-01-15 17:43:46  星洲日报    

限首500摩托骑士．林财耀周六派免费添油固本

砂拉越

（诗巫15日讯）诗巫区国会议员林财耀服务中心举办的“免费摩托燃油津贴计划”活动，将于1月18日至20日（星期六至星期一）在奥本路国油油站（敦化中学旁）进行。

届时，诗巫区国会议员林财耀将于1月18日早上9时，为活动进行推展礼，并将派发免费燃油津贴给首500名摩托骑士，每份津贴为价值5令吉的RON95汽油，先到先得。

林财耀说，该活动是希盟政府为减轻人民负担，并庆祝农历新年佳节，所以提供燃油津贴给摩托骑士。因此，摩托骑士受促于1月18日早上9时开始，可到该油站领取固本，并在1月18日至20日期间在该油站的营业时间添油。

Mycomments：

砂拉越是个资源非常丰富的产油国。咱们一天在3海里60攒油台 生产平均85万桶优质的石油。3海里外还有180攒油台，一天生产多少桶油，Petronas拒绝给砂国政府数据。所谓的国会议员YB林财耀和YB刘强燕完全不亢一声。YB刘强燕还在那畸形的国会里询问Mahathir首相如何对付砂独分子呢。被马来亚无限掠夺后，沦陷到今天这种地步，这些YB还沾沾自喜，派免费添油固本，一点羞耻心都没有。

砂拉越生产的石油是世界上数一数二非常优质的石油。而这些优质的石油是提炼后卖到中国，日本，韩国，台湾等等。我们砂拉越人用的油是Petronas从他国进口劣质汽油。天理在那里？  今天，我看到这这4位YB排排站，好像很了不起能给500名摩托骑士价值5令吉的RON95汽油，还要先到先得呢。我希望我们Sibu摩托骑士们，有志气的拒绝这种羞辱。我们要的是石油天然气一切属于砂拉越100%回归砂拉越人。 我们的资源被掠夺后，是如此的回馈吗？  我想这4位排排站的YBs，知耻 吗？  天啊！

林財耀冀熱心人士幫忙 醫院需添新淨水系統

---

砂拉越

林財耀冀熱心人士幫忙 醫院需添新淨水系統

（本报诗巫9日讯）诗巫区国会议员林财耀表示，若是要增加诗巫中央医院的洗肾机器，就有必要增添一套价值20多万令吉的净水系统。
他表明他会向联邦卫生部争取拨款，同时他的选区服务中心也会给予帮助，不过仍需要获得社会热心人士的支持。
他称，目前诗巫中央医院只有20台洗肾机器，若是要再增加洗肾机器，就必须要增加一台净水系统，因为目前的净水系统已经处于满载的状态，无法提供净水予新的洗肾机器。
林财耀指出，由于医院能够扩张的空间有限，因此他将会与院方研究，以更有效的使用医院的范围。
他续称，若是要增加洗肾机器的数量，就要装修2个房间，之后就能够容纳30台洗肾机器。
他希望能够在未来2年内，能够为诗巫中央医院增添这些设备，以提升医院的洗肾服务，让更多低下阶层人士受惠。

文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2020-01-09 

Mycomments：

         砂国资源丰富， 却沦陷成一个州，变相被马来亚掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫和霸凌。变成这么贫穷的。医院的设备是谁的责任？ 是时候砂拉越要迈向独立自主一切了吧。只有独立自主，跟马来亚完全切割，资源回归砂国，砂拉越才有机会发展自己。打造一流的医药设备。

         诗巫区国会议员林财耀呼吁民众捐献，像以往的YB作风一模一样，想把政府的责任推得一干二净。以前，看到YB们常常一点也不脸红的呼吁公众捐献建校基金，医疗设备，救灾捐款等等。 民众很多傻傻的去做，有的还抢先去赈灾呢？

詹雪梅.2019遇见《癌症的真相》翻译成英文版

sinchew.com.my

詹雪梅.2019遇见《癌症的真相》

       Although different kinds of cancer have become so common, there are more and more 

cancer patients and related information around us, once our loved ones have cancer, 

it will still be a panic and helpless suffering.  There is always so much fear associated with it.

      The most terrible thing about cancer is the overwhelming fear we have about cancer.   

 We actually quickly equate cancer to death and pass the death sentence to ourselves or our 

relatives.   Our world just falls apart as a result.  The main reason for such a shock is that we 

have no idea how to face it, seek treatment and find ways to survive.

    Most people have so little understanding about their body until they fall sick.  You may 

be so professional in your field but are completely unconscious and ignorant of your body 

(except those in medical fields).  You may not know where your heart, liver, spleen, lungs and 

kidneys are located; when your body sends out different signals but you just fail to notice how 

your body are screaming for help.  You are so numb that you are totally oblivious to the 

extreme condition of your body.  Likewise for cancer, a person only tries to understand what 

cancer is when the illness strikes himself or his loved one.

         But trying to understand cancer is so painstaking when all kinds of information are 

at your fingertips.   All these pieces of information also make people more confused and 

helpless to decide which piece of information is helpful and relevant.  Although I have been 

dealing with cancer for many years and tried to check the various opinions, I was so confused 

until I came across the book "The Truth about Cancer" in 2019.  The author Ty M. Bollinger, 

7 of his family members died of cancer  in 8 years.  He has spent nearly 20 years in cancer 

research, collating relatively comprehensive cancer data, and summarising it into three parts: 

1.  Causes and prevention of cancer; 

2.  Various successful treatment options; 

3.  Hidden Worries about Cancer Treatment in Western Medicine. 

         The book can be regarded as a comprehensive guide to cancer, pathology, diet, 

various types of treatment. 

         Perhaps to some so-called "cancer experts", this book is a contradiction of mainstream 

western medicine.  But at least, Ty M. Bollinger clearly and succinctly let us know that cancer 

is not hereditary, not a cursed misfortune, or even a disease.  It is but a response to the 

survival mechanism of the body's low immunity.  Though some “prescriptions” and treatment 

methods seem unscientific, their effectiveness is well-found.  He systematically sorted out what 

he knows, of course, some of his points of view are quite subjective.  Whether they can be 

trusted or not depends very much on the individual.

        Everyone is a unique individual.  The same medical treatment and procedure used in

different persons may not have the same end results. In other words, the fixed method and 

treatment procedure may prove effective for A, but not necessarily for B.  Each medical school 

has its own assertions.  It is hard to tell which one is better.  Among all the choices, a person can

seek the most suitable medical treatment for himself to get treated.  

        "Cancer really doesn't equate to 'death sentence'.   We should always have hope as you 

have many natural alternatives which are far better than the 'Three well-known treatments' 

-- chemotherapy, radiation therapy and surgery.  Although these alternative treatment may not 

have the endorsement, they don't poison, attack or burn your body to save lives. "

      In the face of disease, especially cancer, we may have to think, is our choice the only option?

Note:  This article is good enough and came at just the right time, so I translated the Chinese 

           script into the English language for those who cannot understand the Chinese language.

         Of course, I use the Google translation facility.

sinchew.com.my

詹雪梅.2019遇见《癌症的真相》

      虽然各种癌症已愈加普遍，我们身边的癌患和相关资讯也越来越多，可是一旦我们的至亲患癌，仍将会是一场惊恐和无助的煎熬。癌，还是令人闻之色变的。

        癌症的可怕在于，我们总是不做他想的认为癌症很可怕。因为恐惧和不知所措，我们其实很快自己为自己，或亲属默默地判了死刑，即使心里有多不愿意。癌之所以会让我们的世界山崩地裂，多半在于我们不知该如何面对，该如何寻求治疗，该如何找到活下去的方法。

        多数人对自己身体的了解，往往是在患病之后。大家可以在各自的领域非常专业，但对自己的身体却彻底无感和无知（医药界人士除外）。可以理所当然地不知道自己的心、肝、脾、肺、肾所在；当身体发出各种讯息时，也不知道该如何聆听自已身体的呐喊和求救，甚至麻木到不知道自己正处在饥饿状态中。面对癌症亦是如此，惟有亲人或自己患癌后，才会试图了解什么是癌症。       

可是试图了解癌症，也一场耗费心神的寻觅，各种资讯唾手可得之际，却也会让人更茫然和无力。在海量的资讯中，究竟哪一个才是真相？哪一个才真正有帮助？我虽和癌症打交道多年，努力查看各家说法，却依然惶惶不可终日，直到在2019年遇见《癌症的真相》。作者泰波林吉（Ty M. Bollinger）是癌患家属，8年里经历了7位家人患癌而逝。他用了近20年的时间投入癌症研究，整理出相对全面的癌症资料，并将之归纳为3部份，包括：一、癌症的成因及预防；二、各种成功的治疗方案；三、西方医学的治癌隐忧。算是一本概括了病理、饮食、各类疗养的癌症入门大全。   

     也许在一些所谓的“癌症专家”看来，此书是有违主流西方医学的悖论，更不可依样画葫芦。但最起码，泰波林吉很清楚简白地让我们知道，癌症不是遗传，不是被诅咒的不幸，甚至不是疾病，而是身体免疫力低下的求生机制反应。一些看似不科学的“偏方”和治疗方法，其实也是有依据的。他把自己所知进行了系统梳理，当然一些观点还是有主观意识的，当不当信，在于读者。

        每个人都是独特的生命个体，即使相似，却必不相同。同样的医疗方法用在不同的人身上，果效也将是不同的。即便有一套固定的方法和治疗程序，但对A有效，对B则未必。医疗方法各家各派各有主张，没有哪个更好，只有哪个更适合。向谁求医，要如何治疗，我们应该可以有更多选择。

          “癌症真的不必然等于‘被宣判死刑’，我们永远都有希望……你有许多的自然替代性方案远胜过于‘三大天王’──化学治疗、放射线治疗、手术──虽然这些替代性疗法可能没有相关的认可背书，但……你不是非得要毒害、攻击或焚烧自己的身体来挽救生命。”

      在面对疾病，尤其是癌症时，我们或许要思考，我们笃信的选择是唯一的选择吗？

肯雅兰全民党新闻 日期：2019年12月23日

肯雅兰全民党新闻     日期：2019年12月23日 致可敬的马来西亚首相敦马哈迪·莫哈末的信         我于2019年11月21日草拟的8页信原本应该在三周前寄给马来西亚首相敦马哈迪·莫哈末，但由于我想增加更多论点，所以一直保留到今天。         这份重新草稿的日期为2019年12月20日的长达17页的信的陈述是对马来西亚首相的要求，要求马来西亚首相考虑与砂拉越政府和所有当地政党（不包括马来亚政党）举行会议，以要求进行公开讨论，和非政府组织将砂拉越释放出来，使其脱离马来西亚联邦。        法律专家告诉我，事实上马来西亚联邦是在没有法律依据或未经人民同意的情况下成立的联邦。因此，成立马来西亚的合法性受到质疑，该信详细说明了成立马来西亚联邦的可能非法性。法律专家认为马来西亚是非法联盟或非法联邦的理由包括，它不是按照国际习惯法成立的，而且成立也违反了联合国大会第1514号决议。         许多法律专家还认为，作为马来西亚成立基础的1963年《马来西亚协议》是无效，无效率和不可执行的（合同从开始就无效），因为在签署《1963马来西亚协定》（MA63）时，新加坡，沙巴和砂拉越 仍然是英国的殖民地没有法律能力和已经独立的马来亚联邦来达成协议。          我向马来西亚首相的陈述是，即使马来西亚是合法组成的，砂拉越仍有权自由退出其与马来亚的自愿联盟，就像英国寻求退出欧洲联盟一样。 新加坡在1965年自由，和平地退出了马来西亚，这是砂拉越可以依靠的政治和法律先例。         在我的信的陈述中，马来西亚首相敦马哈迪·莫哈末被告知，马来西亚的合法性必须基于其合法构成和政治上的正当性，而马来西亚联盟的形成就缺乏这两个重要的基础。         在我向马来西亚首相敦马哈迪·莫哈末的陈述中，我还提到，假设《1963马来西亚协定》（MA63）有效，则故意不执行其联邦条款和条件后果是有效地终止了联邦关系，赋予砂拉越和沙巴权利退出马来西亚联盟。         提出以下几点来确定《1963马来西亚协定》（MA63）的问题（如果是有效和合理的签署）： 1. 1963年，砂拉越和北婆罗洲（沙巴）人民受到压力，必须在扩大的马来  亚  ] 联邦（更名为“马来西亚”）的保护下放弃其独立权，以换取发展与安 全。 2. 《1963马来西亚协定》（MA63）的主要目标作为是要完美完成“去殖民化   计划”旨在建立其发展，安全，利益和福利的民主世俗多元文化联邦，但从    未实现，而在56年之后仍在重新谈判中。 3.  从在砂拉越和沙巴有计划的经济掠夺中可以看出联邦的失败。这催生了一  个被有权势者互惠互利和滥用的制度，其中包括一长串的渎职，腐败和治  理无能，以及侵犯砂拉越和沙巴人民的人权，自决权和“保证的” 《1963马 来西亚协定》（MA63）特殊权利。 4. 值得注意的是，1963年有争议的砂拉越和沙巴被并入马来西亚（印尼和菲 律宾当时特别反对）成功地将它们降低为婆罗洲人民所担心的殖民附庸国的 地位，并成为该马来亚联邦最受重视的国家殖民地“房地产”是马来亚联邦至 关重要的经济开发区。 5. 砂拉越和沙巴州的经济体反映了殖民地体系，其中石油资源和油棕种植园已 成为马来西亚经济的两个最重要部门，提供了联邦收入的一半以上。通过一 系列出售油棕种植园的土地而获得的马来亚人对砂拉越大片土地的越来越大 的公司所有权，增加了普通农村人民的痛苦。砂拉越和沙巴对马来亚开发资 源的强奸使这两个国家不发达，成为该马来西亚联盟的两个最贫困地区，人 民处于落后和贫困状态。 6. 人民极为不满地看到，非法掠夺包括砂拉越石油和天然气以及习俗地   （NCR）在内的自然资源以造福和发展马来亚各州。联邦议会对1966年 《海洋大陆和海底平原法》（Continental Shelf Act 1966），1974年《石油 开发法》（Petroleum Development Act 1974），A 354法（1976年） （Act A 354 (1976)）和《 2012年领海法》（Territorial Sea Act 2012）进 行了违宪的颁布。砂拉越州人民认为这是马来亚联邦对砂拉越国资源的盗窃 或抢劫。 7. 联邦在这56年以来，至少有5年的时间是由紧急法统治的，加上镇压政 治，经济和人权以实施马来亚化以及对人民和经济的控制。这就引出了一个 问题，即当联邦必须在如此长的时期内以紧急权力和法律进行统治时，它是 否具有合法性。 8. 同时，长期执行的马来亚计划（最近主持的马来人尊严代表大会（由您主 持）公开宣布以“马来亚化”来殖民砂拉越和沙巴），违反了《1963马来西 亚协定》（MA63）的目标和精神。 根据“马来西亚属于马来人”或 “ Ketuanan Melayu”的议程，将联邦重组成种族宗教体系。 这封致马来西亚首相敦马哈迪·莫哈末的信的副本已寄给英国首相，英国劳工党领袖，美国总统，联合国大会主席，联合国人权委员会和国际正义法院。 这封信的副本也寄给了沙巴和砂拉越的首席部长，还寄给了当地各政党和大约90个非政府组织。 温利山 肯雅兰全民党主席