四驱车坠下60米山沟 夫妻亡2儿获救

• 14 11, 2019
• 登载于 砂拉越

拉让江上游的加帛省发生死亡交通事故，现场山路崎岖。

（诗巫14日讯）拉让江上游的加帛省发生死亡交通事故，救援单位昨天下午4 时接到通报赶往现场 （ MUJONG ，JIWA MURNI路一公里） ，发现一辆四轮驱动车驾驶失控，坠入路边大约60米深度的山沟，车上乘坐的是一家四口，夫妻随着车子掉落山沟而死亡，2名年少的儿子获救。

当地消防与拯救局人员到场施援，得知一对男女随着车子掉落山沟，消防员估计山沟的坡度有75度，使用“滑轮和绳索系统”的救援设备下到山沟，发现男死者Guntur卧尸的位置距离车子大约10米，而他的妻子则在车子附近。

消防员使用滑轮担架将2 人拉上路边，由到场参与救援的当地医院急症科医疗人员进行检查，发现这对男女已经死亡，尸体交给警方送入医院太平间。

一辆四轮驱动车掉进加帛省路边山沟，造成一对青年夫妻死亡。

男女死者是43岁的丈夫Guntur Dampa及38岁的妻子Lucy Bekeh，受伤而获救的是他们的2 个儿子，16岁的Eldickson Linggong及8 岁的Rizky Renggan，他们的在车子坠入山沟前离开车内。

当地消防与拯救局共派出8 名人员及一辆紧急救援车到场，救援工作进行到下午5 时30分结束。

消防与拯救员下到山沟，使用滑轮担架将尸体拉上路边。

 

My comments：

自10月20日2019年，我朋友23岁儿子在Rantau Panjang， Sibu翻车入沟，溺毙后，我就追踪 这种新闻。这是第8宗。路边没有安全措施车滑下坡或滑进沟造成的伤亡 。

Facebook

theborneopost.com

DUN rejects emergency motion on Sabah, Sarawak High Court Registrar’s move to Kota Kinabalu | Borneo Post Online

The views of the Sarawak State Assembly building taken from the air – Bernama file photo

KUCHING: An emergency motion seeking for the State Legislative Assembly (DUN) to reiterate and reaffirm its protest against the decision to relocate the office of the Registrar of High Court in Sabah and Sarawak from Kuching to Kota Kinabalu, Sabah effective this Friday was rejected in the august House today.
        DUN Speaker Datuk Amar Mohd Asfia Awang Nassar disallowed the motion moved by Batu Lintang assemblyman See Chee How under the grounds that the motion should have been sent at least 24 hours before the commencement of DUN Sitting at 9am today.
     “Under Standing Order 15(2), a member who wishes to seek leave to move the adjournment of the Dewan shall at least 24 hours before the commencement of the Sitting hand to the Speaker a written notification to be approved by the Speaker of the matter which he wishes to discuss,” he said, noting that he had only received the notification yesterday evening which was less than 24 hours before the start of this morning’s Sitting.
        Though he acknowledged that the motion was a “very good” one which touches the interest of Sarawak, he regrettably had to disallow the motion in view of the time constraint.
        See, when moving the motion, said the Chief Registrar of Federal Court of Malaysia together with senior members of the judiciary have met with Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Tun Openg yesterday to obtain his consent on the impending relocation of the registrar office effective November 15.
     “Whereas the Dewan has unanimously passed the motion on April 30 2019, that the decision to relocate the office from Kuching to Kota Kinabalu was made in contradiction with Article 121(4) of the Federal Constitution to put on record our strong displeasure and protest against the decision of the relocation and call upon the state government to stand firm against the relocation.
      “It’s moved that this House here thereby resolves that this honourable legislative assembly reiterates and reaffirms this decision against the relocation of the office from Kuching to Kota Kinabalu for the reason enumerated in the motion passed in the august House on April 30 to protect the sanctity of the Federal Constitution and to safeguard in variable constitutional rights of Sarawak,” he said.
When Asfia rejected the motion, this had led Kota Sentosa assemblyman Chong Chieng Jen to urge to suspend the requirement of 24 hours in view that the meeting between the Chief Registrar of Federal Court of Malaysia and Chief Minister was held the day before.
    “No doubt the motion was handed short of the time provided under the Standing Order but you do have the power to suspend certain provision of the Standing Order in order to facilitate the deliberation of more important matters.
    “Due to its importance and also the fact that this is a follow-up on a motion that has been passed in this House, I urged the Speaker to suspend the requirement of 24 hours as provided under Standing Order 15 and have the motion in this House be debated to reaffirm and reiterate our stand to maintain the Registry of High Court of Sabah and Sarawak in Kuching.”
       See also argued that it is the power of the DUN Speaker to waive the requirement of a 24-hour notice to table the motion and that the discretion should be exercised in this case considering the urgency and importance of the matter.
       However, Asfia said that his ruling to reject the debate of the motion was also made in view of the passing of the Motion made on April 30 this year, that under the Standing Order, a motion on the same subject matter cannot be moved and be debated in the House twice unless the latter is a motion of rescission.
        The State Assembly, on April 30, unanimously called upon the state government to stand firm against any move to relocate the principal registry of the High Court in Sabah and Sarawak from Kuching to Kota Kinabalu and also to undertake all necessary engagement and actions to protect the sanctity of the Federal Constitution and to safeguard the inviolable constitutional rights of Sarawak.
        On April 19, a circular signed by the Chief Registrar of the Federal Court had stated that the registry would be relocated to Kota Kinabalu on May 1.
The relocation did not occur following strong objection from the Chief Minister’s office as well as the state’s legal fraternity.
        The Federal Court Chief Registrar had issued a circular on April 23 to announce that the planned relocation would not be implement.

My comments:
What is the motive of relocating the Registry of High Court Sabah and Sarawak in Kuching to be relocated to Kota Kinabalu in Sabah?  What is DUN Sarawak?  Where is the power of DUN Sarawak?  By the way, we Sarawakians will tell GPS-clowned political clowns, to make way for Party Bumi Keyalang/PBK, the only party that i see so far dare to declare their political will to quest for Sarawak Independence which means to sever with the Malayan government once and for all.  I believe that PBK will attract lots and lots of Sarawakians to follow the determination of this party.

No, no extreme will last.  Mahathir, this devil will see the end of his evilness in Sarawak if Allah has the eye to see all and never misses one.  May Allah bless all the Sarawakians who are prepared to end the Malayan parties meddling in my country, Sarawak.

MA63 is a fraud and shall be settled at the International Court of Justice.  I strongly believe that since Mauritius has gained back the Chagos Island, there is no reason to say that MA63 is not a fraud as Sarawak and Sabah had no political capacity to sign an international treaty.  Everything was done against the will of Sarawakians.  Many Sarawakians went underground at that time just because of this forced federation with the Malayan government.  The federation of Malaysia is in a mess as it has no base instead these Malayan devils use MA57 in place of MA63.

Once it is settled in the International Court of Justice, the whole-wide world will see the breakup of this federation of Malaysia which is actually the federation of Malaya in disguise.

2019-11-09 16:06:58  
   

翻车落沟． 司机溺毙

砂拉越

肇祸货卡被拖出水面时，警员发现司机受困在车内，但已没生命迹象。

（尼亚石山9日讯）货卡失控翻覆在路旁油棕园大沟渠，受困车内的六旬华裔司机惨遭溺毙。
夺命意外于今日清晨五时许，在美民沿海公路苏埃区甘榜依朗路段发生。
死者是来自诗巫的陈柏林（译音，65岁）。由于车祸地点偏郊，死者疑肇祸后受困车内，无法脱困惨遭溺毙。
现场消息指出，当地园丘的保安员今早上班时发现有货卡翻覆在沟渠内，但不知车内有人受困。

文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2019-11-09 

Mycomments：

从10月20日，我朋友23岁的儿子，溺毙在Rantau Panjang 追踪起 到现在，这是第七宗了。 太可怕了。这是被马来亚政府殖民和砂政府贪污舞弊滥权腐败后的结果。几天几天，就发生。我不知道TaibMahmud会怎么想？  GPS政府是否知道事态太严重了。高官们天天谈论的是他们之间的权益分配。人民死活是人民的事。所以，我期待该朝换代的来临。希望越快越好。

---

newsarawaktribune.com.my

Lina Soo’s fight for Sarawak

Editors

STAR President Lina Soo.

KUCHING: Well, by all means, if my quest to fight for my beloved State of Sarawak should land me in jail, why not?

You would not believe the above statement was made by a lady!

So, who is she? Well, she definitely is a lady with plenty of guts to say so. And most of all, she is willing to give all her unconditional love to the ‘Land of Hornbills’.

She is none other than Lina Soo. She is a petite and sweet person, and one who sets her priority straight. Currently, she is the President of Star Reform Party (STAR), an opposition party in Sarawak.

New Sarawak Tribune was eager to know about Lina’s strong will and determination to fight for Sarawak’s right, and decided to interview her.

When asked how old she is, she answered with a laugh: “Well a lady’s age is always a secret!”

Lina went to SMK St. Mary’s in Kuching, and went on to pursue a Master degree in Business Adminstration (MBA) from Leicester University in England.

She has a daughter who is currently working in Singapore.

In 2013, Robert Pei, a Sarawak-born lawyer practicing in Australia sent Lina the declassified colonial documents to study, and gave her his research papers on the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). Lina then started to scrutinise them and did more research on MA63. 

She studied the British documents and later wrote her first book, ‘Sarawak, The Real Deal’ which was published and released on Sept 24, 2013. The book’s released date was in line with the founding date of Sarawak, which was on Sept 24, 1841. It is based upon the British documents and Sarawak gazetted records.

In 2016, she decided to join STAR. Before that, she was with the then Malaya-based opposition party, Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR) and later, Sarawak United Peoples’s Party (SUPP).

Q: What influenced you to join politics?

A: I grew up in the era of the formation of Malaysia, and when MA63 was formed. I was still young at that time, and didn’t quite know what it was about. It all started in 2013, when I began to show interest to learn more about MA63, and came to realise that the book is the only weapon that could save Sarawak.

My main reason and purpose of joining politics is to help gain back what belongs to Sarawak, and also to create public awareness on MA63 among Sarawakians.

Q: How have you managed to create the awareness and what challenges did you face at the initial stages?

A: I started to give public talks on MA63 and the formation of Malaysia in 2013 which were held in Kuching, Sibu, Bintulu, Miri, and Kuala Lumpur.

I was doing it as the President of Sarawak Association of People’s Aspiration (SAPA), which is a Sarawak NGO for Sarawak rights.

Then in November 2014, the former Minister of Home Affairs Dato Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi deregistered SAPA and claimed that the association was a threat to public order and security.

The challenges were there; each time I held a public talk on MA63, the Special Branch would track and interrogate me. And I had to give a police statement after the talk.

But that didn’t stop me and other members. We went to the High Court and Appeal Court to set aside the Home Minister’s order, and we won twice. Now, the case is pending before the Federal Court. Since we have a new government that is in power, we will request the Home Affairs Ministry to withdraw their appeal.

Q: Do you think many are aware of it now?

A: Yes, it took me five years to talk about MA63. I believe many are aware of it already and are more politically matured now.

The youths especially, they have been starting to learn and educate themselves on MA63.

I will still continue to create more awareness on MA63 and hope more youths and the public at large will take the time to study about it.

Q: What made you decide to join PKR and SUPP, and then left?

A: I only joined PKR for a while and then left because Malaya party interests are not compatible with Sarawak interests.

On SUPP, I joined the party also for short while and left because I realised the leaders were not working for the people effectively. Today some of those leaders are no longer in the party due to election defeats.

Q: Why STAR?

A: All political parties are good as they share similar objectives of what to fight for justice, fairness, improve the economic standards, and to empower the people.

However, it depends on the leaders to make a difference, whether they are fighting for the people or for personal interest.

“A political party is like a knife. The knife can be used to save a life in surgery or it can be used to injure or kill.”

I fell in love with STAR because it is a party for Sarawakians who love Sarawak. The party is a struggling party with financial constraints as it does not have any tycoon or businessmen to donate to it.

STAR members love their party, and of course Sarawak. We share the bond of passion for our State (note that Sarawak is a country within the Federation of Malaysia).

In STAR, we struggle for Sarawak’s rights, interest, territorial integrity, pride, and internal sovereignty.

For having the same vision, that is what binds STAR members.

Q: Any big plans for STAR?

A: Founded in October 1996, STAR currently has more than 5,000 members throughout Sarawak.

We are small now, but we are consistent in our political beliefs and agenda, and are getting more support from throughout Sarawak.

You see, Rome was not built in a day. We are confident that more Sarawakians will be attracted to STAR to share the same aspirations for a stronger Sarawak in terms of economic and political rights. And for the sake of our future generations!

Q: What values do you uphold in continuing to fight for Sarawak?

A: Consistency and belief in doing what is right for the people and country.

To quote former United States President John F. Kenny, “Ask not what your country can do for you but what you can do for your country.”

8/11/2019 借题发挥

星洲日报   8/11/2019  借题发挥

看完--刘惟诚：希盟近期失分不少  砂盟胜算看高一线—读后感 （原文找不到）

       砂拉越人身在马来亚的刘讲师，时势评论员，远距离的以纵观角度评估砂国目前政治局势，认为第12届砂国选举，砂盟还是占优势。砂盟对垒希盟，他认为是6：4胜输。这是他的看法。没有对错可言。

        我是砂拉越人身在砂拉越，也深深的生话在自家祖国砂拉越，小市民一位，近距离的，以纵观加横观预测第12届砂国选举。有一点点预感，但是很爱预测的DNA，常常会去预测事情：中或不中，都有，常常是（我）40：60（专家）。有时，我的准确度也高达80%-90%。

第12届砂国选举，我也预测了。 PH顶多拿5个席位。我的朋友认为会拿到15席位。 OK，不伤和气下，我们就等着瞧吧。 我和他看PH是5：15。 砂盟要面对的还有肯雅兰全民党（是我100%支持的政党），革新党，新达雅党等等等。

        目前，如果越来越多砂人达到这共识：先消灭PH马来亚来的海盗党，这些外来掠夺匪。后才消灭GPS本土的强盗和掠夺匪。护航肯雅兰全民党上场执政。肯民党的终极目标是砂拉越独立。砂拉越独立不是[天方夜谭]。是可以实际实现的事实。铁一般的事实。看新加坡，科索沃，Rhodesia等等国家，近50 年，有百多个国家独立。

        在联合国官方网站，砂拉越的身份是允许独立的国家。砂拉越不是马来亚的领土，不像香港和台湾是中国的领土。马来西亚就是马来亚的化名，一直以来，想方设法掩盖砂沙两国的历史事实。违宪修改MA63。用各种法令：内安法令；煽动法令和紧急法令打压沙砂两国就范。消灭26间砂国金融公司。硬硬 将沙砂两国贬成州。合法化拼吞砂沙两国。可惜，功亏一匮，无法得逞。网络的发达就是Allah的旨意，正义总有见天日的一天。今天，砂民的醒觉就是伸张砂国独立正义的时辰。

        谁不要砂国独立自主一切。砂资源100%发展砂国。那位砂民会傻到要留马继续被殖民当[亡国奴]呢？ 所以，独立后种种的好处，不用书读的（福州话名言），砂民都知道的。在这种种的前提下，那位乡民不心动呢？ 所以乡民支持不支持砂独，需要多一点横观解读吧。  林梅芳

dayakdaily.com

No invasion or colonisation, Sarawak an independent state in its own right under Brookes – NGO

EditorGO

KUCHING, Nov 7: Sabah Sarawak Rights Australia New Zealand (SSRANZ) holds that there was no invasion by Sir James Brooke to acquire Sarawak, as it was granted to him by the Brunei Sultanate in 1839.
       Its president Robert Pei disagreed with Kota Sentosa assemblyman’s claim that Brooke rule of Sarawak was an “invasion and colonisation” as reported in the media, in relation to a debate on the Sarawak Heritage Bill.
“On the claim that Sarawak was a Brooke colony, this is refuted by the historic fact that Sarawak was founded as an independent sovereign state in 1841 following the Brunei sultanate’s 1839 grant of the Sarawak province to James Brooke. There was no invasion.”
       While he acknowledged that there was resistance to Brooke territorial expansionist policies which clashed with local interests, he stated that there was no doubt that Sarawak was an independent state from 1841 to 1941.
     “The United States recognised it as such in 1850 and the UK followed in 1863 and this historic fact is still acknowledged even today.
     “Sarawak was ruled as an absolute monarchy by the White Rajahs albeit administered with feudal and colonial administrative features. But this does not strictly make it a colony as different from the system which Sarawak DAP has submitted to,” said Pei in a statement today.
      He said Chong had contradicted himself by acknowledging the historic importance of the Brooke judicial system when he criticised that the Kuching Old Courthouse had been “desecrated” by being commercialised instead of preserved as a heritage building.
       That the Brooke judicial system was not subject to any foreign jurisdiction or control was evidence of Sarawak’s independence.
        Sarawak as a sovereign state had power to make treaties with the UK (such as the 1888 Protectorate Treaty) and neighbouring countries, established diplomatic relations with other states and governed the country and managed the economy with its own government administration and judicial system, defence forces and currency.
        It only became a colony for the last 78 years following Japanese occupation in 1941.
       He said Sarawak was an independent state from 1841 to 1941 as it had made treaties with other states, thereby disproving the argument that it was a colony.
    “However, conversely in 1963 Sarawak was still a British colony and therefore did not have the capacity to make a treaty – the Malaysia Agreement (MA63) with the UK or Malaya.  MA63 was void from the beginning and not binding. Malaysia stands as a de facto federation and its legitimacy is in doubt,” he said.
      Pei said many may not be aware that there is a hidden reason in denying the historic fact that Sarawak was an independent state.
    “This is to avoid focusing attention on one of many legal grounds which invalidates the MA63 as a treaty.   MA63 was made in breach of international law and UN General Assembly Resolution 1514 evidenced by the United Kingdom’s 1963 breach of its 1946 undertaking to restore Sarawak independence.
      “Towards the end of 1945 two eminent British Queens counsels gave a joint legal opinion confirming that Sarawak was an independent sovereign state and that it would be illegal for the UK to annex Sarawak.
      “This opinion was given to Anthony Brooke who led the anti-Cession movement to defend Sarawak independence and opposed the British plan to annex Sarawak as a crown colony in 1946,” said Pei.
        He said Sarawakians were twice denied even a referendum by the UK to choose on the Malaysia issue.  The UK used the Cobbold Commission of enquiry in 1962 and then the UN “assessment of the people’s wishes” on the Malaysia Question in 1963 to legitimise the federation plan.
      “Neither were a proper way to obtain the people’s wishes or consent on the vital issue of their destiny, which should only be freely expressed in a referendum,” he claimed.
        Nevertheless, this principle of freedom to “secede” for self-determination or independence was stated by British government officials themselves.
Lord Lansdowne IGC Chairman had stated in response to Sarawak demands for a sunset clause in the “reconstituted” Malayan federal constitution, that any state voluntarily entering into a federation “has the intrinsic right to secede any time”.
       He said, on May 9, 1946 the British government in an attempt to deflect the Sarawak anti-Cession movement’s demands for Sarawak independence gave a public undertaking that in annexing Sarawak it would not to include Sarawak in the Malayan Union being proposed after World War II (formed in 1946) and that Sarawak independence would be restored under the 9 Cardinal Principles of the 1941 Sarawak Constitution.
    “This solemn undertaking is legally binding and one of the many weak links in the creation of Malaysia which Sarawak nationalists are seeking to break by demanding the restoration of Sarawak independence.
        “The failure to keep its undertaking exposes the UK’s utter disregard for the Sarawak people’s right to self-determination which make its Malaysia proposal even more wrongful.
         The Malayan narrative is therefore to steer focus away from Sarawak’s former independent status avoid the issue being raised as a challenge on whether MA63 was lawfully made, said Pei.
         Meanwhile, Pei also questioned why Chong refused to recognise Sarawak’s identity as an independent nation.
      “Why was the MP (Chong who is Stampin MP) denying that the Brookes had created Sarawak’s identity as an independent country and nation?
     “This was a stark difference from SUPP (Sarawak United Peoples’ Party) YB Lo Khere Chiang’s call to Prime Minister Mahathir to hold a referendum on Sarawak independence and that Sarawak was practically a colony of Peninsular Malaysia which showed a disregard for the wishes and intent of the spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
      “The two different approaches shows that a Malayan party will fight for Malayan interests while a Sarawak party will defend Sarawak interests,” said Pei. — DayakDaily

---

2019-11-06 18:25:18     

刹车器失灵退落山谷．拖格罗里司机 重创亡

（民都鲁5日讯）行驶中的拖格罗里疑刹车器失灵，在驶上斜坡路段时，罗里突然倒退并坠入山谷，司机当场重伤身亡。
这起事件是于昨早十时许，在布拉甲一带发生。死者是36岁纳明，伊班裔。
据悉，事发当时男子驾驶拖格罗里并载着两名跟车员，前往当地木山营送货，却在上斜坡路段时，拖格罗里突然刹车失灵，车子倒退并坠下山谷。
司机头部受重创，两名跟车员受轻伤，事发后跟车员爬出车，向附近员工求助。
医护人员到场检查司机的伤势时，发现他已没有生命迹象，随后通知警方，由黑车将死者的遗体送往民都鲁医院太平间。
交警目前已接获消息，并向两名跟车员了解事发经过。

文章来源 ： 星洲日报 2019-11-06 

My comments：

（一）从10月20日，我朋友孩子在Sibu Rantau Panjang 连人带车滚入沟里，整辆车翻转，四轮朝天，溺死。（二）接着10月27日，另一辆载有9岁儿子的司机在Jalan LingKaiCheng同样的滚入沟里，整辆车翻转朝天，司机溺死。那小孩及时被救出。 （三）同一天， 另一个地方，Sarikei，也发生整辆车翻转朝天。还好路边沟狭窄，所以没有入沟。 （四）过不久， 有一辆巴士侧躺在沟边。 第三和第四宗，星洲日报 报道的。有图片见证。  (五)posted on November 5, 2019, 。。 the 4WD plunged into following the crash at KM75 of Mukah/Selangau Road.  今天Bintulu这一宗是第六个是滑下坡的车祸。

我不知道，我们还要多少宗，有关单位才会注意到事态严重。 请不要先怪司机。请不要怪车辆的状况。先检讨路况。 是否是时候在有路旁有大过2尺水沟的建起栏杆或覆盖着水沟。政治垄断，所以建路也是垄断。垄断建的道路都是状况多多。所以，从种种车祸的发生，我大胆的做预测GPS政府命是不长了。这种死伤的冤魂是缠绕着这些政客和党的。人民肯定是一条心对抗这种霸道和人民脱节的政党和政客们。