中国报 2015年12月8日 [求查敦马1.194兆钜款民行向反贪委会投报]（无法copy &paste ）
只好大概讲说，要知道细节，有标题[ ]任大家去游览。在网络的天空下， 贪污舞弊滥权腐败的事，肯定有很好的记载和记录。
三年前，大家还不是盟友之前的行动。这事实还是事实，只是大家现在是同一伙人。既然是同一伙人，以前的旧事盟友肯定不要从新挖掘，再次摊开来研究和谈或采取会伤盟友关系的行动。但是，我们人民还人民，我们有[知道的权利]。我们还一样的希望反贪委委员会会处理好Najib-IMDB事完成后。就是[没收/confiscate]所有不属于Najib和他朋党的产业和钱财回来还债。敦马22+在位，不少的财物应该是从我们沙砂两邦掠夺，捞取和剥削的。 所以应该要归还n%给我们做后补发展。 查敦马1.194兆的钜款多少是他干净的钱多少%是贪污舞弊滥权的不义之财。还有TaibMahmudRM68亿财富，还有，还有所有者198？到2018年贪官所收刮贪污舞弊滥权的财富统统回归国库。这些钱一定可以清还这极度集权联邦国的所有债务。
贪官剥夺人民应有的基本措施，教育，生活水准。。。。
Sunday, 27 May 2018
Thursday, 24 May 2018
theborneopost.com
KUCHING: The Pakatan Harapan (PH) government is committed to restoring the autonomous powers of Sarawak and Sabah in line with Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
PH advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim gave this assurance in an exclusive interview with Oriental Daily on Tuesday in which he also fielded questions posed by The Borneo Post on the way forward vis-à-vis the devolution process.
“We are committed to enhancing such powers for the states — which is devolution from an over-centralised federal government. But as I said, the details have to be worked out,” he stressed.
In Buku Harapan (PH Election Manifesto), PH has declared it will adhere to the true spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, based on mutually agreed special clauses.
The immediate task is to set up a Cabinet Committee, consisting of representatives from the Peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak, who have expertise in relevant matters to review and monitor the fair implementation of MA63 within the first 100 days of PH administration and to submit detailed reports to the government within six months of the Committee’s formation for immediate execution.
However, Anwar, in assuring that promises will be fulfilled, cautioned the empowerment should not empower corruption.
“My friends in Sarawak and Sabah know we want their states to be empowered but not to empower corruption. As you decentralise power from the federal to the province, in the process, you decentralise corruption.
“So that’s our concern. There is no problem of giving powers — we make sure the financial disciplines are observed because the reforms start from KL, Putrajaya. So the reforms must continue to other areas,” he said.
The Cabinet Committee’s main tasks, as listed in Buku Harapan, include:
Anwar quashed rumours Sarawak is joining the PH government, saying instead the PH government should work with the state government.
“Nobody says they are joining. They have been elected and we have to accept for now that they have the mandate, so we work with them.
“However, they (Sarawak government) also have to work with the federal government and understand as well that they have a federal government with new policies.“
A transcript of the interview on selected pertinent issues is published in the Q and A below. The answers have been edited briefly for grammar and clarity.
Anwars talks on Umno, 1MDB and Dr M
Q: As an ex-BN and Umno leader, how and what is their future outlook? Or should I ask if there is still future for them?
DSAI: I don’t know about BN as it’s much weaker now but Umno can sustain itself and emerge as an opposition for now — but that’s it. You know Umno leaders are weak. They have been living so long in the comfort zone that they cannot imagine they can be in opposition. But I know we will not treat them as they have treated us.
Of course, we make sure we will be just and firm with our reasons and act accordingly.
Q: What is your comment on 1MDB?
DSAI: I raised 1MDB in parliament in 2010. I questioned the government why do you keep eight billion ringgit in Cayman Islands. However, they went around — and on and on and on. The bloated debts and the siphoning of funds – they have to answer to these.
Q: Are there evidence to frame charges for 1MDB scandal?
DSAI: That’s up to the independent court, not my court, to decide and adjudicate. But I believe from the facts we have seen and the extravagances and the lifestyles, he (Najib) has to answer and that’s why I have advised him to get good counsel.
Q: There are talks the police raid and legal action against Najib during Bulan Puasa is disrespectful. What do you think?
DSAI: It’s a strange understanding. If someone kills someone else and you say ‘don’t touch him or her, it’s Bulan Puasa’. It’s absurd. It has nothing to do with Islam. Yes, during Puasa, you’re supposed to be good, kind, compassionate but you still have to act — the government has to run.
Q: Did Keadilan make any prior deal with Umno to set up the government?
DSAI: They kept asking if Zahid (Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, former DPM now acting Umno president) has come to see me. Of course, he came to see me four months ago when I had surgery, so did Najib and Nazri. But it was a hospital setting with doctors around, so we didn’t discuss politics.
Then they said he (Zahid) came to see me recently but he didn’t. There is no basis to that. Why do we have to enter into an agreement with them when we have the majority? Anwar is not PM.
Q: Is Zahid close to you?
DSAI: So was Najib, so was Mahathir in those days and so many others. Name any Umno leader from before, they were all close to me. I was nice to them, so they were nice to me.
My relationship with Zahid is now cordial. When he called me during election night, I picked up the phone nicely. When Najib called, I answered nicely. I think you have to be civil and hopefully, part of the reforms is you can be government, you can be opposition but you will not be unjust to anybody.
Q: Are you in touch with Zahid?
DSAI: Yes on the night of elections but after that, there has been no contact with him.
Q: In GE14, one of the issues was our diplomatic relations with China. How should we manage them?
DSAI: I don’t think it’s an issue of diplomatic relations. Rather, it’s an issue where we, as a nation, a sovereign nation, has a right to decide on the types of investments, the types of deals and the costs of projects we want to have – that’s all. Nobody is against investments from China, India, Australia or the Arab world.
But here, questions were raised on the conditions imposed and whether there were deals other than normal projects.
I don’t think we share the view that the good relations with China should be affected. I don’t think so.
Q: What about the deals (with China)? Will they be reviewed?
DSAI: We are reviewing because when you understand that the deals are not done properly, they will be to the disadvantage of the locals. We need to relook some of those aspects.
Q: One of the major reasons people voted PH in GE14 is the hope for institutional reforms. For you, what’s the most difficult part in reforming the institutions?
DSAI: The system — independence of the judiciary, media freedom, enforcement agencies, fair, free and just elections. These are things that appear to be crumbling and the immediate task, therefore, is to make sure they are put in order with an impressive palace of justice but we must be committed. There must be independent judges who adjudicate based on fact and law.
So that’s the major task but to me, other than all these institutions, the most important of all is, of course, economic policy. Pro-growth, pro-market but at the same time, we cannot ignore the plights of the poor and the genuine concerns of the population at large over the increasing commodity prices which are affecting their quality of life. We need to do something to lighten their burden and alleviate their hardships.
Q: Many Chinese are worried about the development of Islamisation movement in Malaysia. What are your thoughts?
DSAI: Islamisation is a controversial term because Muslims will say what’s wrong with getting Muslims to be better Muslims. The problem now is that it has been hijacked by the extremists and those with a narrow understanding of Islam. So you have all these issues of new laws to be promoted and propagated in parliament without any educated discussions. This has been exacerbated due to Umno’s willingness to collaborate with these people.
There are bound to be differences of opinion but when it comes to a crunch, do we have the mandate? Yes, we have and, of course, we will be just. And we will also stop racism and corruption.
Q: PH Presidential Council consists of six top leaders — two from PPBM, two from PKR, and one each from DAP and Amanah. Some say there is no equality or is unfair. If PPBM tie up with PKR, they will dominate the Council. Your comments?
DSAI: These are conjectures. There’s no basis. As we have seen, we are working together. Of course, there are unhappy people because even the major appointments are non-Keadilan but the show must go on. We can voice out views to Tun (Mahathir) but we must be completely loyal.
Q: However, should there be any confrontation, you have four votes against two.
DSAI: So far, it has not happened. The spirit is consensus — my view is consensus.
Q: In the finance ministry, there are five advisors and you are not on the list. In fact you are equally qualified, if not most qualified to be one of them. Why do you choose not to be in the panel?
DSAI: It’s ok. If Mahathir wants to run the show, let him run the show. I told him I don’t want to be appointed to any portfolio in the Cabinet or agencies and I think that’s why he appointed other people. Even then, I caution. I say be careful, we have to do the work. We don’t want Umno 2.0. We don’t want corruption, we don’t want cryonics.
We want the PH government to be strong, so we have to be patient and let Mahathir execute the reforms.
I still read and keep abreast of what’s going on and we can balance issues with the Pakatan Council. That route is better in my view.
Q: How do you see Tun Mahathir 20 years after his retirement?
DSAI: He’s still Mahathir but of course he has mellowed quite a lot. Now, he understands more how the government runs and how it can be abused. The new Mahathir is more willing to listen and discuss as a team.
The first time I met him was in the court. He came to see me and of course in my heart I asked why did he need to do this to me. But it is OK. What’s important is we move on. People don’t care who is Mahathir or Anwar. People are waiting (for reform).
Q: Do you mind making a comparison between Rafizi (Ramli) and Azmin (Ali)?
DSAI: Rafizi is a smart young man who initiated INVOKE as an example how he can mobilise the young people. As a young man, he has every right to express his views. Sometimes, he gets a bit critical but I’m ok. I get a bit angry at times but you must allow them room to blossom, not to kill them off like what the previous government did.
As for Azmin, he became MB of Selangor and now Minister of Economic Development. So, I don’t see any problem except they have to make sure they get the right message across.
Q: Given the choice, who would you pick to lead the PKR?
DSAI: I want both Rafizi and Azmin to be at what they are doing now, working together to support the reform agenda — (with a pause) under Anwar Ibrahim.
My comments on the devolution of power to Sarawak
I believe 99% of Sarawakians are looking forwards to this action, not words. We are all fed up with any unnecessary delay. We want to see the proper devolution of power to Sarawak. That means to return all the rights vested in MA63. People in general are awake now and are aware that how we have been colonised by ex-UMNO-BN government. We have become impatient and angry if there is any breach of trust.
People in general are set to change the Sarawak government for good or the government are set to be changed for good in the next Sarawak election to be held in 2021 as scheduled.
PH to keep its word on MA63
Phyllis Wong
Anwar
assures the federal government’s commitment to restoring the state’s
rights under MA63 and gave candid views on reforms, Umno and Dr M KUCHING: The Pakatan Harapan (PH) government is committed to restoring the autonomous powers of Sarawak and Sabah in line with Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
PH advisor Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim gave this assurance in an exclusive interview with Oriental Daily on Tuesday in which he also fielded questions posed by The Borneo Post on the way forward vis-à-vis the devolution process.
“We are committed to enhancing such powers for the states — which is devolution from an over-centralised federal government. But as I said, the details have to be worked out,” he stressed.
In Buku Harapan (PH Election Manifesto), PH has declared it will adhere to the true spirit of the Malaysia Agreement 1963, based on mutually agreed special clauses.
The immediate task is to set up a Cabinet Committee, consisting of representatives from the Peninsula, Sabah and Sarawak, who have expertise in relevant matters to review and monitor the fair implementation of MA63 within the first 100 days of PH administration and to submit detailed reports to the government within six months of the Committee’s formation for immediate execution.
However, Anwar, in assuring that promises will be fulfilled, cautioned the empowerment should not empower corruption.
“My friends in Sarawak and Sabah know we want their states to be empowered but not to empower corruption. As you decentralise power from the federal to the province, in the process, you decentralise corruption.
“So that’s our concern. There is no problem of giving powers — we make sure the financial disciplines are observed because the reforms start from KL, Putrajaya. So the reforms must continue to other areas,” he said.
The Cabinet Committee’s main tasks, as listed in Buku Harapan, include:
- Review and propose measures to rectify the status of Malaysia Agreement 1963 based on current legislations.
- Efforts to enhance the understanding of the people on the 1963 Malaysia Agreement through the national education system.
- Implementation of the concept of federalism for the three territories within Malaysia.
- The rights of Sabah and Sarawak to revenues from their natural resources such as oil and gas.
- The administrative rights — the share of funds that rightfully belong to Sabah and Sarawak.
Anwar quashed rumours Sarawak is joining the PH government, saying instead the PH government should work with the state government.
“Nobody says they are joining. They have been elected and we have to accept for now that they have the mandate, so we work with them.
“However, they (Sarawak government) also have to work with the federal government and understand as well that they have a federal government with new policies.“
A transcript of the interview on selected pertinent issues is published in the Q and A below. The answers have been edited briefly for grammar and clarity.
Anwars talks on Umno, 1MDB and Dr M
Q: As an ex-BN and Umno leader, how and what is their future outlook? Or should I ask if there is still future for them?
DSAI: I don’t know about BN as it’s much weaker now but Umno can sustain itself and emerge as an opposition for now — but that’s it. You know Umno leaders are weak. They have been living so long in the comfort zone that they cannot imagine they can be in opposition. But I know we will not treat them as they have treated us.
Of course, we make sure we will be just and firm with our reasons and act accordingly.
Q: What is your comment on 1MDB?
DSAI: I raised 1MDB in parliament in 2010. I questioned the government why do you keep eight billion ringgit in Cayman Islands. However, they went around — and on and on and on. The bloated debts and the siphoning of funds – they have to answer to these.
Q: Are there evidence to frame charges for 1MDB scandal?
DSAI: That’s up to the independent court, not my court, to decide and adjudicate. But I believe from the facts we have seen and the extravagances and the lifestyles, he (Najib) has to answer and that’s why I have advised him to get good counsel.
Q: There are talks the police raid and legal action against Najib during Bulan Puasa is disrespectful. What do you think?
DSAI: It’s a strange understanding. If someone kills someone else and you say ‘don’t touch him or her, it’s Bulan Puasa’. It’s absurd. It has nothing to do with Islam. Yes, during Puasa, you’re supposed to be good, kind, compassionate but you still have to act — the government has to run.
Q: Did Keadilan make any prior deal with Umno to set up the government?
DSAI: They kept asking if Zahid (Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, former DPM now acting Umno president) has come to see me. Of course, he came to see me four months ago when I had surgery, so did Najib and Nazri. But it was a hospital setting with doctors around, so we didn’t discuss politics.
Then they said he (Zahid) came to see me recently but he didn’t. There is no basis to that. Why do we have to enter into an agreement with them when we have the majority? Anwar is not PM.
Q: Is Zahid close to you?
DSAI: So was Najib, so was Mahathir in those days and so many others. Name any Umno leader from before, they were all close to me. I was nice to them, so they were nice to me.
My relationship with Zahid is now cordial. When he called me during election night, I picked up the phone nicely. When Najib called, I answered nicely. I think you have to be civil and hopefully, part of the reforms is you can be government, you can be opposition but you will not be unjust to anybody.
Q: Are you in touch with Zahid?
DSAI: Yes on the night of elections but after that, there has been no contact with him.
Q: In GE14, one of the issues was our diplomatic relations with China. How should we manage them?
DSAI: I don’t think it’s an issue of diplomatic relations. Rather, it’s an issue where we, as a nation, a sovereign nation, has a right to decide on the types of investments, the types of deals and the costs of projects we want to have – that’s all. Nobody is against investments from China, India, Australia or the Arab world.
But here, questions were raised on the conditions imposed and whether there were deals other than normal projects.
I don’t think we share the view that the good relations with China should be affected. I don’t think so.
Q: What about the deals (with China)? Will they be reviewed?
DSAI: We are reviewing because when you understand that the deals are not done properly, they will be to the disadvantage of the locals. We need to relook some of those aspects.
Q: One of the major reasons people voted PH in GE14 is the hope for institutional reforms. For you, what’s the most difficult part in reforming the institutions?
DSAI: The system — independence of the judiciary, media freedom, enforcement agencies, fair, free and just elections. These are things that appear to be crumbling and the immediate task, therefore, is to make sure they are put in order with an impressive palace of justice but we must be committed. There must be independent judges who adjudicate based on fact and law.
So that’s the major task but to me, other than all these institutions, the most important of all is, of course, economic policy. Pro-growth, pro-market but at the same time, we cannot ignore the plights of the poor and the genuine concerns of the population at large over the increasing commodity prices which are affecting their quality of life. We need to do something to lighten their burden and alleviate their hardships.
Q: Many Chinese are worried about the development of Islamisation movement in Malaysia. What are your thoughts?
DSAI: Islamisation is a controversial term because Muslims will say what’s wrong with getting Muslims to be better Muslims. The problem now is that it has been hijacked by the extremists and those with a narrow understanding of Islam. So you have all these issues of new laws to be promoted and propagated in parliament without any educated discussions. This has been exacerbated due to Umno’s willingness to collaborate with these people.
There are bound to be differences of opinion but when it comes to a crunch, do we have the mandate? Yes, we have and, of course, we will be just. And we will also stop racism and corruption.
Q: PH Presidential Council consists of six top leaders — two from PPBM, two from PKR, and one each from DAP and Amanah. Some say there is no equality or is unfair. If PPBM tie up with PKR, they will dominate the Council. Your comments?
DSAI: These are conjectures. There’s no basis. As we have seen, we are working together. Of course, there are unhappy people because even the major appointments are non-Keadilan but the show must go on. We can voice out views to Tun (Mahathir) but we must be completely loyal.
Q: However, should there be any confrontation, you have four votes against two.
DSAI: So far, it has not happened. The spirit is consensus — my view is consensus.
Q: In the finance ministry, there are five advisors and you are not on the list. In fact you are equally qualified, if not most qualified to be one of them. Why do you choose not to be in the panel?
DSAI: It’s ok. If Mahathir wants to run the show, let him run the show. I told him I don’t want to be appointed to any portfolio in the Cabinet or agencies and I think that’s why he appointed other people. Even then, I caution. I say be careful, we have to do the work. We don’t want Umno 2.0. We don’t want corruption, we don’t want cryonics.
We want the PH government to be strong, so we have to be patient and let Mahathir execute the reforms.
I still read and keep abreast of what’s going on and we can balance issues with the Pakatan Council. That route is better in my view.
Q: How do you see Tun Mahathir 20 years after his retirement?
DSAI: He’s still Mahathir but of course he has mellowed quite a lot. Now, he understands more how the government runs and how it can be abused. The new Mahathir is more willing to listen and discuss as a team.
The first time I met him was in the court. He came to see me and of course in my heart I asked why did he need to do this to me. But it is OK. What’s important is we move on. People don’t care who is Mahathir or Anwar. People are waiting (for reform).
Q: Do you mind making a comparison between Rafizi (Ramli) and Azmin (Ali)?
DSAI: Rafizi is a smart young man who initiated INVOKE as an example how he can mobilise the young people. As a young man, he has every right to express his views. Sometimes, he gets a bit critical but I’m ok. I get a bit angry at times but you must allow them room to blossom, not to kill them off like what the previous government did.
As for Azmin, he became MB of Selangor and now Minister of Economic Development. So, I don’t see any problem except they have to make sure they get the right message across.
Q: Given the choice, who would you pick to lead the PKR?
DSAI: I want both Rafizi and Azmin to be at what they are doing now, working together to support the reform agenda — (with a pause) under Anwar Ibrahim.
My comments on the devolution of power to Sarawak
I believe 99% of Sarawakians are looking forwards to this action, not words. We are all fed up with any unnecessary delay. We want to see the proper devolution of power to Sarawak. That means to return all the rights vested in MA63. People in general are awake now and are aware that how we have been colonised by ex-UMNO-BN government. We have become impatient and angry if there is any breach of trust.
People in general are set to change the Sarawak government for good or the government are set to be changed for good in the next Sarawak election to be held in 2021 as scheduled.
Tweet and blog 24/5/2018 II 看到沙巴冻结木桐出口的联想
Tweets 24/5/2018 II 看到沙巴冻结木桐出口的联想
沙菲益：确保州内供应充足 沙冻结木桐出口
Shafie Apdal 第一步，就让我佩服和羡慕沙巴人总于可以发展和享受沙巴丰富的木材资源。自供自足。还可以制造很多上中下的木材企业。冻结木桐出口可以让沙巴人有无限发展和创造[木的家具]。 真好。40年沙巴人任由自家人结合外人一起掠夺，捞取和剥夺后，总于，解脱了旧政府的种种限制。我真的真的真的很为他们兴奋。同时，我也期待3年后，砂罗越的选举，也可以换政府，破除垄断，杜绝贪污舞弊滥权腐败。让砂罗越复原成为一个干净，生气勃勃，处处有生机，人人有得体的和适合自己的职位或事业，一个充满希望的国度。 出外打拼的砂人可以回流家乡发展自己。这是多么美好的景象啊！ Yes， I also have a dream
like Martin Luther.
Abdul Rahman Yakub 4年+TaibMahmud33+ 年，这对舅舅和侄儿就是我们砂罗越人的耻辱和诅咒，个人和朋党结合外人一起无限了掠夺，捞取和剥削砂罗越人。这些卖国贼和盗贼.忽略了发展砂罗越，所以今天的砂罗越就是这些政客们的缺失的有效的管理和发展
砂邦国。
Wednesday, 23 May 2018
theborneopost.com
RECENT press statements by the newly elected MP for Stampin and other state Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders in Sarawak raised serious doubt as to whether the PH government in Putrajaya will honour what is in the Buku Harapan with regard to ‘the return of Sabah and Sarawak to the status accorded in the Malaysia Agreement’.
The state assemblyman for Batu Lintang, See Chee How, said in The Borneo Post dated May 18, he had no doubt on “the PH government in fulfilling all its promises including the devolution of powers to Sarawak.” PH state chairman Chong Chieng Jen said that devolution of powers to the state was ‘off’ but See said he was “not sure in what context Chong was talking”.
The PH state chief is now reported to have said that “Sarawakians will only acquire autonomy by changing state government” (BP dated May 20. He added “PH will continue to explore other avenues of devolution, including setting up of a special committee to study other aspects of the devolution of powers.”
People are utterly confused on whether PH will restore rights which, according to the ex premier recently, had been inadvertently taken away.
Pakatan Harapan’s promises
The Buku Harapan (PH’s manifesto) promised that not only the status of Sabah and Sarawak would be restored to that stipulated in MA63, but that (a) both states will receive 20 per cent oil royalty, (b) 50 per cent of the revenue collected from the two states will be assigned to Sabah and Sarawak, and (c) devolving powers of education and health to the two states.
The public statements by the local PH politicians and the complete, unexplained silence by the PH national leaders, including the Prime Minister and the Council of Elders/Eminent Persons, on the promises of oil royalty, revenues and devolution of authority over education and health must be a cause of genuine and grave concern for the people of Sarawak and especially those who have been enticed by such promises to vote for PH. On my part I can sense these promises are very unlikely to be fulfilled.
My fears are not unjustified. Let’s look at Pakatan’s track record. In 2008, Pakatan Rakyat in Selangor promised special allowance for single mothers in its manifesto. This promise was never honoured. When the matter was brought to the court by several single mothers, the PKR-led Selangor government argued that what was promised during the election was not legally binding! The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Selangor government [State Government of Selangor v Murtini Kasman & Ors (2014) 7 CLJ 773]. The appellate Court said “A government should not be bound by an election manifesto.”
This brings me to what one of England’s most respected of Judges, Lord Denning, said in Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council (1982) 1 All.ER 129 @ p. 135:
“A manifesto issued by a political party, in order to get votes is not to be taken as gospel. It is not regarded a bond, signed and delivered, and it may contain promises and proposals unworkable or impossible of attainment.”
Lord Denning had in an earlier case of Regina v Liverpool Corporation Ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators’ Association (1972) 2 QB 299 said:
“All political promises are not worth anything.”
What Lord Denning said in these cases have been applied by Justice Abdul Rahman Sebli in the Sabah case of Nasir @ Mohammed Manaf v Datuk Seri Panglima Joseph Pairin Katingan & 8 others (2009) 1 LNS 738 where the Berjaya government was sued for not honouring promises relating to land.
The PH leaders in Sarawak are lawyers by profession and we must assume they know the law in Malaysia is like in England, that is ‘All election promises are not worth anything’ and the PH government is not bound by its manifesto which was issued to get votes. So, PH voters have no legal remedies if the PH’s manifesto promises are not honoured either because of political expediency or because they are unworkable or impossible of attainment.
First order of business
To ease public concern on whether what was promised in Buku Harapan will be carried out and to empower the electorate to hold the PH government accountable for their electoral promises, PH government should as soon as Parliament convenes, pass a Bill to amend the Contracts Act, to make promises in election manifesto contractually and legally binding on the PH government and enforceable by any aggrieved citizen adversely affected by a breach of PH’s election promises.
Without such a law, which should also be made retrospective to a date before GE14,
the voters would continue to be hoodwinked to make voting decisions based upon false hopes that what is in an election manifesto would be carried out by the party when it wins the election. This is a challenge to the member for Stampin who knows how to move a Bill to amend an Act of Parliament. Very recently he moved a motion in Parliament to amend the Petroleum Development Act, 1974 so that the petroleum resources in Sarawak are not vested in Petronas. If the Stampin MP wants the people in Sarawak to have faith in his party’s manifesto, he must unequivocally support a law to make election promises enforceable in Court.
Unless such a law is passed, no one seriously believes that the promises in Buku Harapan on oil royalty, 50 per cent tax revenue for Sabah and Sarawak and devolution of powers for education and health will be honoured.
Unworkable and unattainable promises
Currently, under the Federal Constitution, royalty on minerals, including mineral oils up to 10 per cent ad volerem is assigned to the state under Part V of Tenth Schedule of Federal Constitution. No income or corporation tax collected from Sarawak is assigned to the states. To ensure that 20 per cent oil royalty may be imposed by the state for oil and natural gas, the Federal Constitution must first be amended.
The Tenth Schedule must also be amended to enable the federal government to assign 50 per cent of the taxes derived from Sarawak be paid to the state as an additional source of revenue for Sarawak.
Without such amendments to the Federal Constitution payment of 50 per cent tax revenues from Sarawak to the state may be challenged and ruled as unconstitutional.
Therefore, will the PH government, without a two-third majority in Parliament, be able to fulfil its promises to allow the state to impose and retain 20 per cent royalty from oil and to receive 50 per cent tax revenue? To prove that PH will carry out its election promises on oil royalty and tax revenue, PH should table a Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament to increase the amount of royalty from mineral oil assigned to the state to 20 per cent from the existing five per cent; and also to assign 50 per cent of federal tax collected in Sarawak to the state.
At the same time, the PH government through its new Finance Minister, the secretary general of DAP, must present a budget in Parliament to authorise the assignment of the promised tax revenue to Sarawak.
With regard to Education and Health, these are subject matters in the Federal List over which the federal government has both legislative and executive authority. To ‘devolve’ these subject matters to Sarawak, the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong should make an Order under Article 95C to extend the legislative and executive powers to the state to include ‘Education and Health’. This can easily be done within the first 100 days of the PH administration at Putrajaya.
Monitoring
Unless PH takes the actions outlined above, the promises in Buku Harapan for Sarawak which forms one of the five pillars in the manifesto cannot be implemented. The people, including myself, will closely monitor whether the PH government will take any of these necessary measures. Otherwise, like what the Law now says, “all political promises are not worth anything.”
Additionally, the Member for Stampin must reintroduce in the next sitting of Parliament his motion to amend the PDA to enable Sarawak to regain its sovereign rights to oil and gas found within her boundaries; and ensure that PH government will immediately repeal the ‘unconstitutional’ Territorial Sea Act, 2012. These steps can surely be done within 100 days of GE14 so that Sarawak can forthwith regain all its rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963.
To the Member for Batu Lintang and the MP for Stampin (who is YB for Kota Sentosa) do not waste time forming Special Committee on oil ownership rights or on the PDA and the Territorial Sea Act, 2012, as both of you have repeatedly proclaimed, both inside and outside the Dewan Undangan Negeri, that our oil and gas belonged to Sarawak and was unconstitutionally taken away by the PDA, and also by the Territorial Sea Act, 2012. Now is the time to walk the talk. Get these ‘obnoxious’ laws out of the way as soon as possible, please. Within the first 100 days! The federal PH government should have the political will to do so.
Like all loyal Sarawakians, I await with great anticipation. If PH fails to live up to its promises in the Buku Harapan, we, Sarawakians, must extract retribution in future elections.
My comments:
Promises are made to keep, not to break. Respect is earned not by force. Yes, I am 100% agree with the writer that we need legal biding of all the manifestos stipulated to be passed by law. Don't let the manifestos made in Buku Harapan for Sarawak and Sabah turn out to be Barks of the dogs only.
Will PH be bound by its Buku Harapan?
Legal Eagle
RECENT press statements by the newly elected MP for Stampin and other state Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders in Sarawak raised serious doubt as to whether the PH government in Putrajaya will honour what is in the Buku Harapan with regard to ‘the return of Sabah and Sarawak to the status accorded in the Malaysia Agreement’.
The state assemblyman for Batu Lintang, See Chee How, said in The Borneo Post dated May 18, he had no doubt on “the PH government in fulfilling all its promises including the devolution of powers to Sarawak.” PH state chairman Chong Chieng Jen said that devolution of powers to the state was ‘off’ but See said he was “not sure in what context Chong was talking”.
The PH state chief is now reported to have said that “Sarawakians will only acquire autonomy by changing state government” (BP dated May 20. He added “PH will continue to explore other avenues of devolution, including setting up of a special committee to study other aspects of the devolution of powers.”
People are utterly confused on whether PH will restore rights which, according to the ex premier recently, had been inadvertently taken away.
Pakatan Harapan’s promises
The Buku Harapan (PH’s manifesto) promised that not only the status of Sabah and Sarawak would be restored to that stipulated in MA63, but that (a) both states will receive 20 per cent oil royalty, (b) 50 per cent of the revenue collected from the two states will be assigned to Sabah and Sarawak, and (c) devolving powers of education and health to the two states.
The public statements by the local PH politicians and the complete, unexplained silence by the PH national leaders, including the Prime Minister and the Council of Elders/Eminent Persons, on the promises of oil royalty, revenues and devolution of authority over education and health must be a cause of genuine and grave concern for the people of Sarawak and especially those who have been enticed by such promises to vote for PH. On my part I can sense these promises are very unlikely to be fulfilled.
My fears are not unjustified. Let’s look at Pakatan’s track record. In 2008, Pakatan Rakyat in Selangor promised special allowance for single mothers in its manifesto. This promise was never honoured. When the matter was brought to the court by several single mothers, the PKR-led Selangor government argued that what was promised during the election was not legally binding! The Court of Appeal ruled in favour of the Selangor government [State Government of Selangor v Murtini Kasman & Ors (2014) 7 CLJ 773]. The appellate Court said “A government should not be bound by an election manifesto.”
This brings me to what one of England’s most respected of Judges, Lord Denning, said in Bromley London Borough Council v Greater London Council (1982) 1 All.ER 129 @ p. 135:
“A manifesto issued by a political party, in order to get votes is not to be taken as gospel. It is not regarded a bond, signed and delivered, and it may contain promises and proposals unworkable or impossible of attainment.”
Lord Denning had in an earlier case of Regina v Liverpool Corporation Ex parte Liverpool Taxi Fleet Operators’ Association (1972) 2 QB 299 said:
“All political promises are not worth anything.”
What Lord Denning said in these cases have been applied by Justice Abdul Rahman Sebli in the Sabah case of Nasir @ Mohammed Manaf v Datuk Seri Panglima Joseph Pairin Katingan & 8 others (2009) 1 LNS 738 where the Berjaya government was sued for not honouring promises relating to land.
The PH leaders in Sarawak are lawyers by profession and we must assume they know the law in Malaysia is like in England, that is ‘All election promises are not worth anything’ and the PH government is not bound by its manifesto which was issued to get votes. So, PH voters have no legal remedies if the PH’s manifesto promises are not honoured either because of political expediency or because they are unworkable or impossible of attainment.
First order of business
To ease public concern on whether what was promised in Buku Harapan will be carried out and to empower the electorate to hold the PH government accountable for their electoral promises, PH government should as soon as Parliament convenes, pass a Bill to amend the Contracts Act, to make promises in election manifesto contractually and legally binding on the PH government and enforceable by any aggrieved citizen adversely affected by a breach of PH’s election promises.
Without such a law, which should also be made retrospective to a date before GE14,
the voters would continue to be hoodwinked to make voting decisions based upon false hopes that what is in an election manifesto would be carried out by the party when it wins the election. This is a challenge to the member for Stampin who knows how to move a Bill to amend an Act of Parliament. Very recently he moved a motion in Parliament to amend the Petroleum Development Act, 1974 so that the petroleum resources in Sarawak are not vested in Petronas. If the Stampin MP wants the people in Sarawak to have faith in his party’s manifesto, he must unequivocally support a law to make election promises enforceable in Court.
Unless such a law is passed, no one seriously believes that the promises in Buku Harapan on oil royalty, 50 per cent tax revenue for Sabah and Sarawak and devolution of powers for education and health will be honoured.
Unworkable and unattainable promises
Currently, under the Federal Constitution, royalty on minerals, including mineral oils up to 10 per cent ad volerem is assigned to the state under Part V of Tenth Schedule of Federal Constitution. No income or corporation tax collected from Sarawak is assigned to the states. To ensure that 20 per cent oil royalty may be imposed by the state for oil and natural gas, the Federal Constitution must first be amended.
The Tenth Schedule must also be amended to enable the federal government to assign 50 per cent of the taxes derived from Sarawak be paid to the state as an additional source of revenue for Sarawak.
Without such amendments to the Federal Constitution payment of 50 per cent tax revenues from Sarawak to the state may be challenged and ruled as unconstitutional.
Therefore, will the PH government, without a two-third majority in Parliament, be able to fulfil its promises to allow the state to impose and retain 20 per cent royalty from oil and to receive 50 per cent tax revenue? To prove that PH will carry out its election promises on oil royalty and tax revenue, PH should table a Constitutional Amendment Bill in Parliament to increase the amount of royalty from mineral oil assigned to the state to 20 per cent from the existing five per cent; and also to assign 50 per cent of federal tax collected in Sarawak to the state.
At the same time, the PH government through its new Finance Minister, the secretary general of DAP, must present a budget in Parliament to authorise the assignment of the promised tax revenue to Sarawak.
With regard to Education and Health, these are subject matters in the Federal List over which the federal government has both legislative and executive authority. To ‘devolve’ these subject matters to Sarawak, the Yang Di-Pertuan Agong should make an Order under Article 95C to extend the legislative and executive powers to the state to include ‘Education and Health’. This can easily be done within the first 100 days of the PH administration at Putrajaya.
Monitoring
Unless PH takes the actions outlined above, the promises in Buku Harapan for Sarawak which forms one of the five pillars in the manifesto cannot be implemented. The people, including myself, will closely monitor whether the PH government will take any of these necessary measures. Otherwise, like what the Law now says, “all political promises are not worth anything.”
Additionally, the Member for Stampin must reintroduce in the next sitting of Parliament his motion to amend the PDA to enable Sarawak to regain its sovereign rights to oil and gas found within her boundaries; and ensure that PH government will immediately repeal the ‘unconstitutional’ Territorial Sea Act, 2012. These steps can surely be done within 100 days of GE14 so that Sarawak can forthwith regain all its rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963.
To the Member for Batu Lintang and the MP for Stampin (who is YB for Kota Sentosa) do not waste time forming Special Committee on oil ownership rights or on the PDA and the Territorial Sea Act, 2012, as both of you have repeatedly proclaimed, both inside and outside the Dewan Undangan Negeri, that our oil and gas belonged to Sarawak and was unconstitutionally taken away by the PDA, and also by the Territorial Sea Act, 2012. Now is the time to walk the talk. Get these ‘obnoxious’ laws out of the way as soon as possible, please. Within the first 100 days! The federal PH government should have the political will to do so.
Like all loyal Sarawakians, I await with great anticipation. If PH fails to live up to its promises in the Buku Harapan, we, Sarawakians, must extract retribution in future elections.
My comments:
Promises are made to keep, not to break. Respect is earned not by force. Yes, I am 100% agree with the writer that we need legal biding of all the manifestos stipulated to be passed by law. Don't let the manifestos made in Buku Harapan for Sarawak and Sabah turn out to be Barks of the dogs only.
theborneopost.com
KUCHING:
State Democratic Action Party (DAP) suggested that the concessions of
state road maintenance be given to more than one company.
Speaking to reporters during a press conference today, Padungan assemblyman Wong King Wei commented that the state DAP have suggested that concessions should be divided into 10 regions (or packages) with each region being maintained by different companies.
According to him, the reason why there is a need to award the concessions to 10 different companies is because it enables the state government to compare the works by different companies.
“All this while the concessions of state road maintenance were awarded to only one company, which is CMS Roads Sdn Bhd, and their contract ends this year in 2018. We have many Sarawakian companies who can do the job of road maintenance so why only give to one company?” he questioned.
He also revealed that CMS Roads Sdn Bhd has been maintaining the state roads in Sarawak for 15 years and the ceiling contract sum to maintain all state roads in the state is around RM11 million per month.
Apart from that Wong also commented that state DAP also feels that there is no need for any company to acts as project manager that distributes the concessions to sub-contractors too.
The Borneo Post has reached out to CMS on this matter and is awaiting their response.
Meanwhile, he also wanted to know if the state government will award to the concessions for state road maintenance in open tender form.
This was because before this, the state government has been awarding the concessions to companies behind closed doors and never revealing them to the public.
“Our new federal government insists that all government contracts will only be done by open tender as this is to ensure that only qualified companies are selected to do the job. I hope that the state government will follow the federal government in its effort to have more transparency when it comes to serving the people,” he commented.
Also present during the press conference, which was held at the state DAP headquarters, was Bandar Kuching MP Dr Kelvin Yii.
My Comments:
Monopoly by Taib Mahmud and his beneficiaries have been the curses to us Sarawakians. During his tenure as Chief minister of Sarawak for 33+years, he sold out hectares and hectares of the forest to .... He plundered, raided and exploited people at will. This has always been an open secret. He is the shame and curse of Sarawak.
In the Chinese newspaper Sin Chew Daily News, I have read that the maintenance of the state road is again awarded to CMS for 15 years. It is impossible for the corrupt Sarawak BN leaders to change the practice and break the curse of monopoly on their own. They need help from people to break the spell of curses of corruption and monopoly that have been in practice for ages. But, I bet this contract will be terminated three years later. The change of government is set to happen. Whether you believe it or not is up to you.
DAP suggests state road maintenance concessions be given to different companies
Matthew Umpang
Wong (right) and Dr Yii seen during the press conference.
Speaking to reporters during a press conference today, Padungan assemblyman Wong King Wei commented that the state DAP have suggested that concessions should be divided into 10 regions (or packages) with each region being maintained by different companies.
According to him, the reason why there is a need to award the concessions to 10 different companies is because it enables the state government to compare the works by different companies.
“All this while the concessions of state road maintenance were awarded to only one company, which is CMS Roads Sdn Bhd, and their contract ends this year in 2018. We have many Sarawakian companies who can do the job of road maintenance so why only give to one company?” he questioned.
He also revealed that CMS Roads Sdn Bhd has been maintaining the state roads in Sarawak for 15 years and the ceiling contract sum to maintain all state roads in the state is around RM11 million per month.
Apart from that Wong also commented that state DAP also feels that there is no need for any company to acts as project manager that distributes the concessions to sub-contractors too.
The Borneo Post has reached out to CMS on this matter and is awaiting their response.
Meanwhile, he also wanted to know if the state government will award to the concessions for state road maintenance in open tender form.
This was because before this, the state government has been awarding the concessions to companies behind closed doors and never revealing them to the public.
“Our new federal government insists that all government contracts will only be done by open tender as this is to ensure that only qualified companies are selected to do the job. I hope that the state government will follow the federal government in its effort to have more transparency when it comes to serving the people,” he commented.
Also present during the press conference, which was held at the state DAP headquarters, was Bandar Kuching MP Dr Kelvin Yii.
My Comments:
Monopoly by Taib Mahmud and his beneficiaries have been the curses to us Sarawakians. During his tenure as Chief minister of Sarawak for 33+years, he sold out hectares and hectares of the forest to .... He plundered, raided and exploited people at will. This has always been an open secret. He is the shame and curse of Sarawak.
In the Chinese newspaper Sin Chew Daily News, I have read that the maintenance of the state road is again awarded to CMS for 15 years. It is impossible for the corrupt Sarawak BN leaders to change the practice and break the curse of monopoly on their own. They need help from people to break the spell of curses of corruption and monopoly that have been in practice for ages. But, I bet this contract will be terminated three years later. The change of government is set to happen. Whether you believe it or not is up to you.
今夜最劲爆！
23/5/2018 有人寄给我的
这应该不是假新闻吧。我为什么要转载。目的只有一个。请不要漏掉查Zahid Halmidi 。他那里应该也可也没收一笔钱回来还债吧。
今夜最劲爆！
都说鸡哥河马窃国千亿财富该死，却原来印尼仔也是个巨贪！
知情者愤怒踢爆，他已经低调敛财数百亿！難怪誓死效忠納吉羅斯瑪，原來全是蛇鼠一窩！
敦馬追查贓款，可能單單是這三個大盜身上就可以追回超過1000億了！
现在明白为何他誓死效忠纳吉罗斯玛了吧？因为这对窃国贼公婆在大口大口吞食国家财富的时候，还分了一点好处给他啊！
这些内幕，其实很多人老早就懂，但是因为这三个窃国大盗掌握著国家行政大权，敢调查他们的人都死于非命了，谁嫌命长敢去揭开他们的臭底？
现在倒台了，再也不能仗着恶势力为非作歹了，大家也就壮胆了，越来越多爆料者涌现了；个个恨不得吃他们的肉、剥他们的皮！
根据熟悉内情的《知情者》在马来网站公开踢爆，阿末扎希迄今为止，一共拥有92家大型企业及官联企业，他持有这些大企业的股权，同时安排家族成员代表他出任上市公司董事！单单是这些大企业的股份，价值已经超过200亿，每年分到的红利超过两亿。
另外，网媒也踢爆，目前垄断外劳更新准证合约事务的Myeg，正是肥婆罗斯玛与他家族持有控制性股权的官联企业公司。Myeg每年单单是从外劳身上赚取的阴功钱就进账超过100亿。
还有还有，阿末扎希因为协助纳吉罗斯铲除眼中钉沙菲益及慕尤丁有功，肥婆论功行赏，给了他的家族一个发大财的机会：漂白150万孟加拉外劳的准证合约！这项合约价值超过60亿！
以下是知情者在马来网站公布的、阿末扎希家族持有股权或担任董事的企业名单：
Nama: Datuk
Ahmad Zahid bin Hamidi
ID Baru:
530104-08-6055
Alamat: 389,
Jalan Bayu Nyaman, Country Heights 43000 Kajang,Selangor
No
Syarikat& NamaSyarikat
098342 Kulim
Enterprise Sdn Bhd
352275
Poliperkasa Realty Sdn Bhd
358454
Innovation Wood Sdn Bhd
284688
Eksekutif Kualiti Sdn Bhd
153388 YGP
Holdings Sdn Bhd
118860
Yayasan Gerakbakti Kebangsaan
017892
Federal Power Sdn Bhd
272712
Kelana Impian Sdn Bhd
235313
Excellent Sempuria (M) Sdn Bhd
413100
Rainbow Bay Sdn Bhd
064775
Measurement (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
377274
Dutaace Industries Sdn Bhd
283239
Poliperkasa Sdn Bhd
128885 Airod
Sdn Bhd
395240
Esprimax Sdn Bhd
273972 BCM
Electronics Corporation Sdn Bhd
159826 Page
Development Sdn Bhd
159407
Sabahmas Plantations Sdn Bhd
159414 Red
Logging Sdn Bhd
159408 Gepa
Lumber Sdn Bhd
159413
Logmerc Sdn Bhd
319744
Permodalan BSN Berhad
312664 Yadim
Equities Sdn Bhd
312661 Yadim
Holdings Sdn Bhd
133400 Kod
Harta Sdn Bhd
317861
KHB-Jeffa Project Management Sdn Bhd
325617
Halmont Consultancy Sdn Bhd
003707 Seng
Hup Corporation Berhad
450719
Comlenia Sdn Bhd
447252 Bank
Simpanan Nasional Berhad
284036
Eratime Resources Sdn Bhd
043644
Timberwood Sdn Bhd
160143 YGPH
Equities Sdn Bhd
222077
Perdana Sakti Sdn Bhd
338409 Aru
Bina Sdn Bhd
224204
Interfund (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
332468
Winpalm Development Sdn Bhd
341594 Poly
Sepakat Sdn Bhd
239834
Pepeco Sdn Bhd
342561
Janawajib Sdn Bhd
143630
Kobena General Agencies Sdn Bhd
191854
Ramatex Textiles Industrial Sdn Bhd
043351
Gimmill Induatrial (M) Sdn Bhd
343658
Poliperkasa Property Sdn Bhd
357967
Westman Sdn Bhd
437450 Ira
Development Sdn Bhd
412499 Tekgi
Mahir Sdn Bhd
423512
Yayasan Akalbudi Sdn Bhd
129234
Comintel Sdn Bhd
053057
Bintang Angkasa Sdn Bhd
068090
Syarikat Capakaya Sdn Bhd
096429
Syarikat Kretam Plantations Sdn Bhd
048937
Syarikat Kretam Ladang Sdn Bhd
372672
Ramatex Berhad
357125
Tekala Corporation Berhad
377435
Innosabah Capital Holdings Sdn Bhd
168285
Kretam Holdings Berhad
155095
Kretam Management Sdn Bhd
048881
Syarikat Kretam Mill Sdn Bhd
278196 Nilai
Tamaddun Sdn Bhd
352042
Poliperkasa Corporation Sdn Bhd
281627 KHB
Nanyang (Malaysia) Sdn Bhd
286028 Red
Palm Oil Industries Sdn Bhd
261397 KHB
Project Management Sdn Bhd
114724
Translab (M)Sdn Bhd
281431
Pantai Dalam Development Sdn Bhd
119031 N.H.
Holdings Sdn Bhd
285544
Rising Resources Sdn Bhd
111606
E-Channel Sdn Bhd
282224 KHB
Power Sdn Bhd
118860
Yayasan Gerakbakti Kebangsaan Sdn Bhd
258033 KHB
Telecommunications Sdn Bhd
065099
Newcon Machinery Sdn Bhd
297195 KHB
Nusantara Sdn Bhd
260309 KHB
Construction Sdn Bhd
162659 YGPH
Property Development Sdn Bhd
111795 Amaz
Bina Sdn Bhd
265365
Luminous Square Sdn Bhd
122073 Jeffa
Construction Sdn Bhd
323717
Wilahriang Sdn Bhd
316255
Tri-Man Corporation Sdn Bhd
304767 Yadim
Development (Selangor) Sdn Bhd
315977 KHB
Foodlinks Sdn Bhd
322827
Alglobe Progress Sdn Bhd
316256 DST
Citra (M) Sdn Bhd
268052 KHB
Foodchain Sdn Bhd
167994 KM
Plantations Sdn Bhd
317863 KHB
Project Management Holdings Sdn Bhd
271736
Top-Mech Cranes & Hoists (M)Sdn Bhd
261396 KHB
Development Sdn Bhd
264151 KHB
Realty Sdn Bhd
310479 KHB
Management Sdn Bhd
343658
Poliperkasa Property Sdn Bhd
216824 White
Horse Ceramic Industries Sdn Bhd
【阿末扎希押宝中Jackpot，60亿外劳合约落入家族手中！】
政治献金不是罪孽，官商勾结当然也没问题。河马感恩哈米迪，割下小块肥肉酬佣，大马政治就要这样玩！
看哪！空头来了空头来了！做了副首相兼内政部长就有这种公开捞钱的好处。阿末扎希证明了他捧纳吉LP的决定是正确滴。
由阿末扎希亲弟弟阿都哈京哈米迪担任执行主席的《Real Time Networking SdnBhd》目前正与内政部谈商承包150万孟加拉外劳来马打工的手续申请工作。
在这项官商勾结的合作计划下，阿末扎希的弟弟主导的公司将为孟加拉外劳提供网上申请准证服务，通过电子转账方式办理手续，大马与孟加拉两国共同掌握每一个孟加拉外劳的状态。
以每一个孟加拉外劳的工作准证、人头税及各种手续费约4000令吉来算；阿末扎希弟弟如果顺利取得150万全新孟加拉外劳入境工作的申请合约，那就是价值高达60亿令吉的肥水合约了！这回哈米迪家族还不猪笼入水，发过猪头炳？
话说回来，大马所有的外劳手续和准证合约不是已经被地狱夫人肥婆罗斯玛幕后掌控的《MYEG》网上服务公司垄断了吗？那可是每年超过100亿的大水喉，肥婆罗斯玛怎么舍得将其中一小块肥肉拱手让给AhmadZahid Comedy呢？
估计唯一的可能性，是为了报答阿末扎希出卖慕尤丁倒纳吉的图谋计划情报，让纳吉先下手为强干掉黑面神保住权位的恩情吧？
无论如何，哈米迪家族因为阿末扎希押对宝而大发横财，从此富贵逼人，个个摇身一变成为身家数百亿的大富豪，看来已经是不争的事实。
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)