Pages

Powered By Blogger

Friday, 1 December 2023

砂政盟该办的事

砂政党联盟政府将精力集中在天然气分配的垄断游戏上,而不是废除1974年石油发展法令以收回砂拉越石油和天然气所有权,并废除2012年领海法令以收回砂拉越海域和大陆架所有权(以便砂拉越人民可以恢复 300 海里而不是减少 3 海里)。 GPS政府是“砂拉越优先”吗?

据信,当前首相纳吉废除紧急法令时,马来西亚紧急时期制定的1974年石油开发法和2012年领海法已自动失效,不再具有执行力。砂拉越人民质疑砂政党联盟政府是否不愿与联邦政府对抗,并且为了个人利益而不敢收回砂拉越的所有权。

砂政党联盟的YB和国会议员必须告诉砂拉越人民收回砂拉越所有权的下一步是什么吗。如果他们愿意对此事保持沉默,那么现在是时候就不要再支持他们了。


Sarawak GPS government focus its effort in monopoly game of gas distribution instead of repealing Petroleum Development Act 1974 to get back Sarawak oil and gas ownership and repealing Territorial Seas Act 2012 to get back ownership of Sarawak Seas and continental shelf ownership (so that Sarawak people can get back 300 nautical miles Instead of reduced 3 nautical miles). Is GPS government for "Sarawak first"?

It is believed that when ex Prime Minister Najib Razak revoked Emergency Ordinance the Petroleum Development 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 created during Malaysia emergency period has been automatically null and void and no longer enforceable. Sarawak people questioned whether GPS government preferred not to antagonise federal government and for personal interest is too scared to claim back Sarawak ownerships.

Will GPS YBs and MPs tell Sarawak people what's next on taking back Sarawak ownerships? If they prefer to remain silent on the matter, it is time not to support them.

James Chin 的10点协议

大学教授为沙巴和砂拉越提出新的10点协议

古晋(11月30日):砂拉越出生的学者提出了一项新的10点协议,以取代砂拉越现有的18点协议和沙巴的20点协议。

澳洲Tasmania大学亚洲研究教授 James Chin 表示,他提出的 10 点协议重申了该国祖先对沙巴和砂拉越的期望,以及这两个婆罗洲州对联邦政府的期望。

“2023年是马来西亚成立60周年,因此现在是一个非常独特的机会来回顾马来西亚人的经历。

“我们需要向前看,而不是回头看。如果我们都回顾过去,我们的国家就无法进步。”他告诉《婆罗洲邮报》。他强调,这10点建议是他以个人身份起草的,不代表任何组织。

“在我们前进的过程中,我尽可能多地了解沙巴和砂拉越人民的愿望。

他说:“我认为强调我们希望保留我们独特的文化、传统、语言,更重要的是,保持我们人口的多元化,这一点非常重要。”

钦的十点协议呼吁(一)立即实现马来西亚联邦对沙巴和砂拉越人民的梦想和承诺;(二)重申沙巴和砂拉越在组建马来西亚联邦时与马来亚是平等伙伴;(三)并重申婆罗洲州属在联邦宪法第1(2)条下的独特地位,有别于1963年马来西亚协议所载的马来西亚半岛11个州属。

(四)他还寻求重申沙巴和砂拉越各自对其领土范围内的资源拥有专属领土权;(五)重申沙巴和砂拉越的每个社区都有权拥有其独特的文化和仪式表达、身份和语言;(六)重申沙巴和砂拉越是世俗国家、多元宗教社会,正如我们的祖先所承诺的那样;(七)并重申所有沙巴人和砂拉越人都是平等公民,并拒绝一切形式的种族主义、宗教不容忍和至上主义意识形态

最后三点(八)促请沙巴和砂拉越领导人采取主动,按照开国元勋的承诺,在马来西亚联邦内履行国家自治权;(九)重申沙巴人和砂拉越人决定自己未来的基本权利;(十)并申明为所有沙巴人和砂拉越人建设现代、世俗、民主、进步和可持续的未来的承诺。

“我们不希望马来西亚半岛突然强加一个框架,使人口状况分为穆斯林与非穆斯林,或马来人与非马来人一样。这在沙巴和砂拉越行不通的。”他强调,沙巴和砂拉越必须在很大程度上摆脱宗教、民族和/或种族紧张局势。

“我们希望按照我们祖先的愿望保持世俗。我希望人们使用这个 10 点协议作为 18点协议的后续协议,”Chin 说。

Don proposes new 10-point agreement for Sabah, Sarawak

KUCHING (Nov 30): A Sarawak-born academician has come up with a new 10-point agreement to replace the existing 18-point agreement for Sarawak, and 20-point agreement for Sabah.

James Chin, a professor of Asian Studies at University of Tasmania, Australia said his proposed 10-point agreement reaffirms what the nation’s forefathers had wanted for Sabah and Sarawak, and also what the two Borneo states want from the federal government.
“As 2023 is the 60th anniversary of the formation of Malaysia, hence now is a very unique opportunity to look back at what Malaysians had experienced.

“Rather than looking back, we need to look forward. If we all look back, our country cannot progress,” he told The Borneo Post.
He stressed that he drafted the proposed 10-point in his personal capacity and not on behalf of any organisation.

“I have captured as much as possible what are the wishes of the people of Sabah and Sarawak as we move forward.

“I think it is very important to stress that we want to retain our unique cultures, traditions, languages and more importantly, to maintain our diverse population,” he said.

Chin’s 10-point agreement calls for (1) the dream and promise of the Federation of Malaysia for the people of Sabah and Sarawak to be fulfilled without delay; (2)reaffirm Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Malaya in the formation of the Federation of Malaysia; and (3) reaffirm the unique status of the Borneo states under Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution, distinct from the 11 states in Peninsular Malaysia, as enshrined in the Malaysia Agreement of 1963.

It also seeks to (4) reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak each possess exclusive territorial rights over the resources that are within their own territorial boundaries; (5)reaffirm that every community in Sabah and Sarawak has the right to their distinct unique cultures and ceremonial expression, identity and language; (6) reaffirm that Sabah and Sarawak as secular states, multi-religious society as promised by our forefathers; and (7) reaffirm that all Sabahans and Sarawakians are equal citizens, and reject all forms of racism, religious intolerance, and supremacist ideology.

The final three points (8) urge the leaders of Sabah and Sarawak to take the initiative and fulfil the state’s autonomy within the Federation of Malaysia as promised by the founding fathers; (9) reaffirm the fundamental right of Sabahans and Sarawakians to determine their own future; and (10) affirm the commitment to build a modern, secular, democratic, progressive and sustainable future for all Sabahans and Sarawakians.

“We do not want Peninsular Malaysia to suddenly impose a framework where the population situation is like Muslims versus non-Muslims, or Malays versus non-Malays. This does not work very well in Sabah and Sarawak,” he said, stressing that Sabah and Sarawak must remain largely free from religious, ethnic and/or racial tension.
“We want to remain secular as per the wishes of our forefathers. I hope people use this 10-point agreement as a successor to the 20-point agreement,” said Chin.

该做的事,没做

砂政党联盟政府将精力集中在天然气分配的垄断游戏上,而不是废除1974年石油发展法令以收回砂拉越石油和天然气所有权,并废除2012年领海法令以收回砂拉越海域和大陆架所有权(以便砂拉越人民可以恢复 300 海里而不是减少 3 海里)。 GPS政府是“砂拉越优先”吗?

据信,当前首相纳吉废除紧急法令时,马来西亚紧急时期制定的1974年石油开发法和2012年领海法已自动失效,不再具有执行力。砂拉越人民质疑砂政党联盟政府是否不愿与联邦政府对抗,并且为了个人利益而不敢收回砂拉越的所有权。

砂政党联盟的YB和国会议员必须告诉砂拉越人民收回砂拉越所有权的下一步是什么吗。如果他们愿意对此事保持沉默,那么现在是时候就不要再支持他们了。


Sarawak GPS government focus its effort in monopoly game of gas distribution instead of repealing Petroleum Development Act 1974 to get back Sarawak oil and gas ownership and repealing Territorial Seas Act 2012 to get back ownership of Sarawak Seas and continental shelf ownership (so that Sarawak people can get back 300 nautical miles Instead of reduced 3 nautical miles). Is GPS government for "Sarawak first"?

It is believed that when ex Prime Minister Najib Razak revoked Emergency Ordinance the Petroleum Development 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 created during Malaysia emergency period has been automatically null and void and no longer enforceable. Sarawak people questioned whether GPS government preferred not to antagonise federal government and for personal interest is too scared to claim back Sarawak ownerships.

Will GPS YBs and MPs tell Sarawak people what's next on taking back Sarawak ownerships? If they prefer to remain silent on the matter, it is time not to support them.

Wednesday, 29 November 2023

砂人有何感触?

砂人有何感触?
拉巴益:有3000 空缺 – 砂明年填补1500 教师 (诗华日报25/11/23)

这怎么一回事?联邦教育部到底怎么了?是否办事能力出问题或是特意制造砂教师短缺的问题。砂政盟要求砂教师和外州比例为 90:10。

我猜联邦霸权就是要’做死’砂要求的教师比例10个教师中,砂必须占9个。因此,联邦霸权就特意制造这种短缺逼使砂【饥不择食】,欣然接受马半岛来的教师。

砂31位联邦议员完全没有发挥维护砂权益的作用。张健仁还好意思问砂政府为什么在砂议会讨论这些问题(某课题)。前线没做好事,后线不得不插手了。

这些政客应该都把砂人当‘死人’来看待。砂人没有发挥多少砂人的本色;没有多少大格局的思维;没有把砂大小事当成一回事;没看重集体权益。个体整天盲目的忙个不停,到头来一场空。是的,砂人太松散,不够团结,所以政党才如此猖獗。砂民普遍都被政党耍得团团转。

拉巴益说砂教育部在2024下半年才可以解决3000教师短缺中的大概1500. 他声言到30/9/2023,砂缺3076名教师:中学819名;小学2257名。在2/2024年,预测819名中学教师短缺会获得解决。到6/2024年,752名小学教师,预测获得填补。之后,砂还有的1505名教师短缺的问题,有待解决,天啊!

拉巴益‘希望’能招聘失业的非教师本地毕业生解决眼前的教师短缺问题,以维持砂90:马10教师比例。他有向联邦教育部“提议使用所谓服务合同雇佣非教师本地毕业生”。

砂NGOs也有百多个是时候发挥作用集体行动创造大力量维护砂权益。砂人要记得联合国赋予的1514个人自决权和1541集体力量裁决砂未来。记得,S4S集合的共识和行动维护砂权益,慢慢走向独立自主一切像新加坡。

Tuesday, 28 November 2023

Action now

Actions now
‘We are only asking for what’s ours, Dr Sim says of efforts to claim money from Putrajaya’

The total revenue collected from Sarawak last year was roughly about RM300 billion. The federal development funds Budget 2024 to Sarawak is 5.8 billion (6.4%) though a bit higher than Budget 2023 . 

Besides, the budget promised often was often pickpocketed in Putrajaya. Otherwise, there should not have been so many dilapidated schools, clinics, under-equipped hospitals and poor infrastructure in Sarawak. Were 31 parliamentrary members and the Sarawak government doing their work?

Dr Sim says that the Sarawak government has been pursuing the matter relentlessly. But, is there any result besides negotiating X 2?

Why don’t they set the time to accomplish the tasks or sue the Federal government in court? Do they have the political will to do so?
To deal with carnivore-like federal government, we need strict law, boundary and stringent actions.  

According to Dr Sim, last year, Petronas had the recorded profit of RM90 billion and the dividend payment to the federal government is RM50 billion. Why didn’t Sarawak get a share?

Last year (2022), 8 new oil fields and this year 6 new oil fiedls were discovered in Sarawak waters. AbangJo has finally demanded 50% profit share if Petronas wants to drill oil in Sarawak waters from 2022 onwards.  

The 31 MPs should voice out gallantly with no fear to be qualified and be prepared to reject federal development budget 2025 if Sarawak is not given 20% if not 30% of the federal development fund.

To realise the autonomy of Education and Health, we needs the fund.
To accomplish the tasks, the Sarawak government should set the time or sue the federal government in court.

Friday, 17 November 2023

巴团结週不符合砂价值观

巴团结週不符合砂价值观---砂须拿回教育自主权

砂不参加巴团结週是正确的。联邦政府在安华带领下更走样。安华已经走火入魔了。

联邦教育部选边站是愚昧无知的。安华可能🉐到穆斯林吹捧;却失在马联邦非穆斯林的唾弃。 这就是🉐不偿失,后果不堪设想。

马联邦教育本来就办得很不行。在这节骨儿上更乱78糟。

砂倡导和平与和谐价值观。砂可借用其他途径像捐献款项和物质声援巴人民。砂不参加联邦P/巴团结週,我给砂政盟大大的一个赞👍。

砂须拿回教育自主权才从2018年喊话到今天已经5年了。同样的人同样的话,喊了五年,喊的人不烦,听的人是烦死了,质疑砂政盟是否有能力要回属于砂的权力。

最终,我还是认为砂人必须更团结养第3势力从华人区开始来个大突破。

砂人力量一强大起来就可以阻止政党耍伎俩,也可以左右政党安按照民意走向。

一党或联盟独大绝对不是好事,看今天各个政党是否都太猖獗。

人民的1514自决权力量,一做大,联邦政治集团和砂政治集团就不敢玩家家酒,违背民意。

砂人1541集体力量裁定砂更美好,光明未来,大家同意吗?

Monday, 30 October 2023

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya 'sick' policies

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya’s ‘sick’ policies

Francis Paul Siah
28 October, 2023
Malaysiakini

COMMENT I wouldn’t dare claim that I speak for Sarawak.

However, as a Sarawakian, I wish to say that I speak for myself, at the very least, and I’m sure, many Sarawakians too on these current issues which I would describe as “sick” instructions and policies from Putrajaya.

How do I know that there is a large cross-section of my fellow Sarawakians who are in agreement with my views at times? They responded in the affirmative to my posts.

Here’s an example. In my previous article on the Middle East conflict, where I urged the Madani government not to take sides but to consider humanitarian aid for all the innocent victims of war, more than 90 percent of those on my contact list, the majority of whom are Sarawakians of various beliefs, stated their agreement.

I’m also happy to mention that a Malay minister from Sarawak also agreed with my neutral stand and for Malaysia to be a peacemaker and help find solutions to the conflict.

I do not have the minister’s permission to mention names, so it would be unethical for me to reveal the person’s identity.

Seriously, why should anyone be surprised that Malays/Muslims in Sarawak are different from those in Malaya? I have written on this matter before and allow me to recap.

In October 2019, I wrote that Sarawak Malays are already a dignified race and they do not need a Malay Dignity Congress like certain Malay groups in Malaya.

To the academicians from the four universities who initiated the event on Oct 6 four years ago, it might be worth your while to learn from your fellow Malays in Sarawak.

I wrote then: “Simple folks they might be from Borneo, but they are already a dignified race. Sarawak Malays must have been riding on the right track of race relations all along.

“Surely, something must be wrong somewhere if a section of Malays in Malaya feel that they have no dignity left or that their dignity has been threatened”, I added.

On another occasion, I wrote that “Sarawak Malays have no interest in ‘Malay Proclamation’, a declaration initiated by Dr Mahathir Mohamad in May this year.

To the Malays in Sarawak, it is not way off to state that Mahathir’s Malay Proclamation is a useless, worthless document which means nothing to them.

Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg was also quick to dismiss the event, saying “I have no knowledge of the ‘Malay Proclamation’.

“How would I know? We are still busy celebrating Hari Raya in Sarawak, and then the incoming Gawai celebration. Why should I be bothered about issues there (Peninsular Malaysia)?” Abang Johari was reported as saying.

I’m rewinding these two events for a reason and that is to remind Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim not to try too hard to be seen as the Malay hero at home and abroad.

There are also Malays/Muslims in Sarawak, and in Sabah too, who have a different perspective about race/religion matters.

Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) may be partners in Anwar’s Madani government, but the prime minister must never think that he could lead Sarawakians and Sabahans by the nose.

No, sir. I believe the people in the two Borneo territories are aware that they have been taken for a ride for too long and I want Anwar to know that many in Sabah and Sarawak (and I am certainly one of them) resent some Malayan politicians in power for this reason.

So, Anwar and all future prime ministers, don’t push your luck too far with Sarawakians and Sabahans.

We know what we want and for many of us, the next best thing to do is to secede - yes, secession, you heard it right. (I know that’s a “bad word” for many who intend to continue milking the rich resources from Sabah and Sarawak.)

When Putrajaya started introducing “sick” policies like now, how do you expect us, in Sabah and Sarawak, to feel?

When you want to force our schools and students to organise the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools from Oct 29 to Nov 3, that must surely be the worst thing to happen in the history of Sarawak education.

Although it has now been clarified that the event is not mandatory in Sarawak, it is bad enough to involve our schools and students in an emotive issue associated with spite, hatred and anger.

And we have to hear the most “Stupid” (stupid with a capital ‘S’) argument from the Education Ministry that the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools will teach students about humanitarian values and to practise empathy.

To the education minister and her staff, there is a word for stupidity in Sarawak. It is called “paloi”. I see no point in arguing with “paloi” ministers and some of their brainless department heads.

However, I honestly doubt that Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek would even dare to plan the controversial Palestine Solidarity Week without instruction from her boss, the prime minister.

I would like to know whether this matter was brought up for discussion in the cabinet before a decision was made.

If so, what was the input from the other ministers? Was the objection to the event, if any, noted?

Make public the names of ministers who had opposed staging the Palestine Solidarity Week. Don’t pretend there was a general consensus to hold the event. I cannot believe that.

What about the other recent “sick” policy from Putrajaya that all government departments should not entertain any letters written in a language other than the national language Bahasa Malaysia?

I’m glad this was quickly brushed off by Sarawak state secretary Mohd Abu Bakar Marzuki that the ruling does not apply to Sarawak.

Not only that, he also said that federal departments have to accept correspondences from Sarawak written in English as well.

The state secretary made it clear that Sarawak civil service can continue to use English in official communications.

Again, why a need for such a directive from Putrajaya, which is not applicable nationwide?

Eleven months in, Anwar has fumbled again and again but each time, I could forgive him.

This time is different. I believe Anwar is trying his utmost to gain international recognition as a Muslim leader, losing sight in the process that he is prime minister of a multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural secular Malaysia.

Just be wary, Mr Prime Minister, when you try to push too hard on race, religion and language issues upon Malaysians, there are the Borneo territories where our beliefs, cultures and priorities are different from Malaya.

The day we cannot take it anymore, I believe we should seriously work out a solution to our fundamental differences. Perhaps, the best way is to exit.

FRANCIS PAUL SIAH is a veteran Sarawak editor and heads the Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS). He can be reached at sirsiah@gmail.com.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.