Pages

Powered By Blogger

Friday, 1 December 2023

该做的事,没做

砂政党联盟政府将精力集中在天然气分配的垄断游戏上,而不是废除1974年石油发展法令以收回砂拉越石油和天然气所有权,并废除2012年领海法令以收回砂拉越海域和大陆架所有权(以便砂拉越人民可以恢复 300 海里而不是减少 3 海里)。 GPS政府是“砂拉越优先”吗?

据信,当前首相纳吉废除紧急法令时,马来西亚紧急时期制定的1974年石油开发法和2012年领海法已自动失效,不再具有执行力。砂拉越人民质疑砂政党联盟政府是否不愿与联邦政府对抗,并且为了个人利益而不敢收回砂拉越的所有权。

砂政党联盟的YB和国会议员必须告诉砂拉越人民收回砂拉越所有权的下一步是什么吗。如果他们愿意对此事保持沉默,那么现在是时候就不要再支持他们了。


Sarawak GPS government focus its effort in monopoly game of gas distribution instead of repealing Petroleum Development Act 1974 to get back Sarawak oil and gas ownership and repealing Territorial Seas Act 2012 to get back ownership of Sarawak Seas and continental shelf ownership (so that Sarawak people can get back 300 nautical miles Instead of reduced 3 nautical miles). Is GPS government for "Sarawak first"?

It is believed that when ex Prime Minister Najib Razak revoked Emergency Ordinance the Petroleum Development 1974 and Territorial Seas Act 2012 created during Malaysia emergency period has been automatically null and void and no longer enforceable. Sarawak people questioned whether GPS government preferred not to antagonise federal government and for personal interest is too scared to claim back Sarawak ownerships.

Will GPS YBs and MPs tell Sarawak people what's next on taking back Sarawak ownerships? If they prefer to remain silent on the matter, it is time not to support them.

Wednesday, 29 November 2023

砂人有何感触?

砂人有何感触?
拉巴益:有3000 空缺 – 砂明年填补1500 教师 (诗华日报25/11/23)

这怎么一回事?联邦教育部到底怎么了?是否办事能力出问题或是特意制造砂教师短缺的问题。砂政盟要求砂教师和外州比例为 90:10。

我猜联邦霸权就是要’做死’砂要求的教师比例10个教师中,砂必须占9个。因此,联邦霸权就特意制造这种短缺逼使砂【饥不择食】,欣然接受马半岛来的教师。

砂31位联邦议员完全没有发挥维护砂权益的作用。张健仁还好意思问砂政府为什么在砂议会讨论这些问题(某课题)。前线没做好事,后线不得不插手了。

这些政客应该都把砂人当‘死人’来看待。砂人没有发挥多少砂人的本色;没有多少大格局的思维;没有把砂大小事当成一回事;没看重集体权益。个体整天盲目的忙个不停,到头来一场空。是的,砂人太松散,不够团结,所以政党才如此猖獗。砂民普遍都被政党耍得团团转。

拉巴益说砂教育部在2024下半年才可以解决3000教师短缺中的大概1500. 他声言到30/9/2023,砂缺3076名教师:中学819名;小学2257名。在2/2024年,预测819名中学教师短缺会获得解决。到6/2024年,752名小学教师,预测获得填补。之后,砂还有的1505名教师短缺的问题,有待解决,天啊!

拉巴益‘希望’能招聘失业的非教师本地毕业生解决眼前的教师短缺问题,以维持砂90:马10教师比例。他有向联邦教育部“提议使用所谓服务合同雇佣非教师本地毕业生”。

砂NGOs也有百多个是时候发挥作用集体行动创造大力量维护砂权益。砂人要记得联合国赋予的1514个人自决权和1541集体力量裁决砂未来。记得,S4S集合的共识和行动维护砂权益,慢慢走向独立自主一切像新加坡。

Tuesday, 28 November 2023

Action now

Actions now
‘We are only asking for what’s ours, Dr Sim says of efforts to claim money from Putrajaya’

The total revenue collected from Sarawak last year was roughly about RM300 billion. The federal development funds Budget 2024 to Sarawak is 5.8 billion (6.4%) though a bit higher than Budget 2023 . 

Besides, the budget promised often was often pickpocketed in Putrajaya. Otherwise, there should not have been so many dilapidated schools, clinics, under-equipped hospitals and poor infrastructure in Sarawak. Were 31 parliamentrary members and the Sarawak government doing their work?

Dr Sim says that the Sarawak government has been pursuing the matter relentlessly. But, is there any result besides negotiating X 2?

Why don’t they set the time to accomplish the tasks or sue the Federal government in court? Do they have the political will to do so?
To deal with carnivore-like federal government, we need strict law, boundary and stringent actions.  

According to Dr Sim, last year, Petronas had the recorded profit of RM90 billion and the dividend payment to the federal government is RM50 billion. Why didn’t Sarawak get a share?

Last year (2022), 8 new oil fields and this year 6 new oil fiedls were discovered in Sarawak waters. AbangJo has finally demanded 50% profit share if Petronas wants to drill oil in Sarawak waters from 2022 onwards.  

The 31 MPs should voice out gallantly with no fear to be qualified and be prepared to reject federal development budget 2025 if Sarawak is not given 20% if not 30% of the federal development fund.

To realise the autonomy of Education and Health, we needs the fund.
To accomplish the tasks, the Sarawak government should set the time or sue the federal government in court.

Friday, 17 November 2023

巴团结週不符合砂价值观

巴团结週不符合砂价值观---砂须拿回教育自主权

砂不参加巴团结週是正确的。联邦政府在安华带领下更走样。安华已经走火入魔了。

联邦教育部选边站是愚昧无知的。安华可能🉐到穆斯林吹捧;却失在马联邦非穆斯林的唾弃。 这就是🉐不偿失,后果不堪设想。

马联邦教育本来就办得很不行。在这节骨儿上更乱78糟。

砂倡导和平与和谐价值观。砂可借用其他途径像捐献款项和物质声援巴人民。砂不参加联邦P/巴团结週,我给砂政盟大大的一个赞👍。

砂须拿回教育自主权才从2018年喊话到今天已经5年了。同样的人同样的话,喊了五年,喊的人不烦,听的人是烦死了,质疑砂政盟是否有能力要回属于砂的权力。

最终,我还是认为砂人必须更团结养第3势力从华人区开始来个大突破。

砂人力量一强大起来就可以阻止政党耍伎俩,也可以左右政党安按照民意走向。

一党或联盟独大绝对不是好事,看今天各个政党是否都太猖獗。

人民的1514自决权力量,一做大,联邦政治集团和砂政治集团就不敢玩家家酒,违背民意。

砂人1541集体力量裁定砂更美好,光明未来,大家同意吗?

Monday, 30 October 2023

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya 'sick' policies

Leave Sarawak out of Putrajaya’s ‘sick’ policies

Francis Paul Siah
28 October, 2023
Malaysiakini

COMMENT I wouldn’t dare claim that I speak for Sarawak.

However, as a Sarawakian, I wish to say that I speak for myself, at the very least, and I’m sure, many Sarawakians too on these current issues which I would describe as “sick” instructions and policies from Putrajaya.

How do I know that there is a large cross-section of my fellow Sarawakians who are in agreement with my views at times? They responded in the affirmative to my posts.

Here’s an example. In my previous article on the Middle East conflict, where I urged the Madani government not to take sides but to consider humanitarian aid for all the innocent victims of war, more than 90 percent of those on my contact list, the majority of whom are Sarawakians of various beliefs, stated their agreement.

I’m also happy to mention that a Malay minister from Sarawak also agreed with my neutral stand and for Malaysia to be a peacemaker and help find solutions to the conflict.

I do not have the minister’s permission to mention names, so it would be unethical for me to reveal the person’s identity.

Seriously, why should anyone be surprised that Malays/Muslims in Sarawak are different from those in Malaya? I have written on this matter before and allow me to recap.

In October 2019, I wrote that Sarawak Malays are already a dignified race and they do not need a Malay Dignity Congress like certain Malay groups in Malaya.

To the academicians from the four universities who initiated the event on Oct 6 four years ago, it might be worth your while to learn from your fellow Malays in Sarawak.

I wrote then: “Simple folks they might be from Borneo, but they are already a dignified race. Sarawak Malays must have been riding on the right track of race relations all along.

“Surely, something must be wrong somewhere if a section of Malays in Malaya feel that they have no dignity left or that their dignity has been threatened”, I added.

On another occasion, I wrote that “Sarawak Malays have no interest in ‘Malay Proclamation’, a declaration initiated by Dr Mahathir Mohamad in May this year.

To the Malays in Sarawak, it is not way off to state that Mahathir’s Malay Proclamation is a useless, worthless document which means nothing to them.

Sarawak Premier Abang Johari Openg was also quick to dismiss the event, saying “I have no knowledge of the ‘Malay Proclamation’.

“How would I know? We are still busy celebrating Hari Raya in Sarawak, and then the incoming Gawai celebration. Why should I be bothered about issues there (Peninsular Malaysia)?” Abang Johari was reported as saying.

I’m rewinding these two events for a reason and that is to remind Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim not to try too hard to be seen as the Malay hero at home and abroad.

There are also Malays/Muslims in Sarawak, and in Sabah too, who have a different perspective about race/religion matters.

Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) and Gabungan Rakyat Sabah (GRS) may be partners in Anwar’s Madani government, but the prime minister must never think that he could lead Sarawakians and Sabahans by the nose.

No, sir. I believe the people in the two Borneo territories are aware that they have been taken for a ride for too long and I want Anwar to know that many in Sabah and Sarawak (and I am certainly one of them) resent some Malayan politicians in power for this reason.

So, Anwar and all future prime ministers, don’t push your luck too far with Sarawakians and Sabahans.

We know what we want and for many of us, the next best thing to do is to secede - yes, secession, you heard it right. (I know that’s a “bad word” for many who intend to continue milking the rich resources from Sabah and Sarawak.)

When Putrajaya started introducing “sick” policies like now, how do you expect us, in Sabah and Sarawak, to feel?

When you want to force our schools and students to organise the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools from Oct 29 to Nov 3, that must surely be the worst thing to happen in the history of Sarawak education.

Although it has now been clarified that the event is not mandatory in Sarawak, it is bad enough to involve our schools and students in an emotive issue associated with spite, hatred and anger.

And we have to hear the most “Stupid” (stupid with a capital ‘S’) argument from the Education Ministry that the Palestine Solidarity Week in schools will teach students about humanitarian values and to practise empathy.

To the education minister and her staff, there is a word for stupidity in Sarawak. It is called “paloi”. I see no point in arguing with “paloi” ministers and some of their brainless department heads.

However, I honestly doubt that Education Minister Fadhlina Sidek would even dare to plan the controversial Palestine Solidarity Week without instruction from her boss, the prime minister.

I would like to know whether this matter was brought up for discussion in the cabinet before a decision was made.

If so, what was the input from the other ministers? Was the objection to the event, if any, noted?

Make public the names of ministers who had opposed staging the Palestine Solidarity Week. Don’t pretend there was a general consensus to hold the event. I cannot believe that.

What about the other recent “sick” policy from Putrajaya that all government departments should not entertain any letters written in a language other than the national language Bahasa Malaysia?

I’m glad this was quickly brushed off by Sarawak state secretary Mohd Abu Bakar Marzuki that the ruling does not apply to Sarawak.

Not only that, he also said that federal departments have to accept correspondences from Sarawak written in English as well.

The state secretary made it clear that Sarawak civil service can continue to use English in official communications.

Again, why a need for such a directive from Putrajaya, which is not applicable nationwide?

Eleven months in, Anwar has fumbled again and again but each time, I could forgive him.

This time is different. I believe Anwar is trying his utmost to gain international recognition as a Muslim leader, losing sight in the process that he is prime minister of a multi-racial, multi-religious and multi-cultural secular Malaysia.

Just be wary, Mr Prime Minister, when you try to push too hard on race, religion and language issues upon Malaysians, there are the Borneo territories where our beliefs, cultures and priorities are different from Malaya.

The day we cannot take it anymore, I believe we should seriously work out a solution to our fundamental differences. Perhaps, the best way is to exit.

FRANCIS PAUL SIAH is a veteran Sarawak editor and heads the Movement for Change, Sarawak (MoCS). He can be reached at sirsiah@gmail.com.

The views expressed here are those of the author/contributor and do not necessarily represent the views of Malaysiakini.

Monday, 23 October 2023

我怎么认为:邓伦奇--联邦“造王者。。”

我怎么认为:
邓伦奇:联邦“造王者” z砂应提升为“自治”
 
没错,在这时空下,砂政盟现在拥有26个联邦议席稳住联邦联合政府,我认为可以乘机全速在MA63协议规定下的特殊地位要求更高的自治权:列如
一.   立法权
二.砂天然资源 (100%属于砂民的)
三.联邦议席222(我认为马:沙:砂74:74:74否则退出马联邦)
四.宗教自由(永远不变)
五.移民自主 (全权掌握)
六.官方语言 (砂人自决)
七.砂领海领土是12 海里(完璧归赵)
所有属于砂拉越的权益,设时限一一归还,不然,向联合国求公道去。
 
对了,在砂立法议会可制定公投法令维护砂本土自主,“规定关系砂自主自治课题上,赋予砂全民投票权”。
 
嗯,对,在1960年代,砂人被剥夺联合国大会通过的【去殖民化宣言】中1514号决议的自决权和1541号决议的集体人民的抉择。是的,60年前,人联党反殖民争取独立运动,为砂自主自治所做的牺牲和贡献。
 
我完全认同,邓的看法砂立法议会制定公投法的目的就是强大民意力量。是的,公投必须有民意基础,然后,才跟联邦商讨砂独立课题。
 
潘永强博士认为独立课题有触及法律,所有具争议性。我认为潘博士很欠缺MA63,跨政法委员会报考/IGC知识和认知,所有不知道潘是否知道MA63的合法性更更具争议性。我不知道潘博士,政治学者,对Chagos island-Mauritus的案件认知有多少。
 
MA63是国际契约,我相信,有一天,有必要的话,砂倡导砂独立的领袖会向联合国国际法院求审讯要公道去。
 
潘博士认为砂要公投“需要国家同意与允许,如苏格兰要独立公投。。。”必须获得英国的允许。
 
Well,砂跟马联邦的关系有别于英国跟苏格兰的关系:
一.马半岛和砂拉越在千多海里之遥远的距离而英国和苏格兰是在同一块
        土地上。
二.马来亚和砂拉越签的协议充满着争议性而英国和苏格兰签的双方协
         议。
三.砂有固有的权力退出马联邦。砂可以在砂议会完成砂独立程序而苏格兰必须向英国申请独立公投。
 
我认同邓的看法,砂政治领导有必要打造砂民族和开创本土模式以经济和就业生活共同体融合各族。对,对,对,对付种族/宗教主义“最佳的武器”莫过于人民有生活共同点和目标融合在一起。
 
始终,我都认为每个砂民必须肩负这使命一起传播砂拉越民族,大家团结一致以1541号决议集体抉择砂的未来走向。

重拳出击

重拳出击
砂联邦选区重新划分 –选民人数需大致相等
我就针对这组织这标题来说说我的看法。 该文章没声明谁是发言人?
这组织说“选区的重新划分,若不遵守宪法规章的活,那更大的分配不当问题将会出现。。。”它认为砂城乡选区联邦席位选民人数上有很大的落差。这我认同。

它就指出在第15届联邦选举:美里联邦选区有14万3229人数而伊干联邦选区却只有2万8290人。所以当中代表差异是1:5,这表示伊干选区一张选票强度是美里区的5倍。它说在第15届联邦选区,砂的选举商数是6万2680名选民。这商数是砂选民总数÷31砂联邦议席。以该组织的计算,美里联邦议席人数比该选举商数高出128%,然而伊干选民人数比选举商数少了55%。

它说除了乡区以外,砂拉越境内联邦选区的选民人数大致上相等。
它说“根据1人1票的原则,拥有6分1选民的沙砂,已拥有25%的超额代表”。 这种算法必须是在同一块土地上的国家,相等经济发展的前提下是对的。

马来西亚是三国联邦在不同块的土地上,很不相等的经济发展。马来西亚就是马来亚的化名,”一切都以马来亚为尊” 。联邦发展拨款87%多在马来亚。议席分配74.78%在马来亚。

如果按照该组织的 “1人1票的原则”,那么沙砂永远是被边缘化。联邦剥夺沙砂资源后,以人数来分配联邦拨款,那么沙砂别想能有跟马半岛相等的经济发展。这“1人1票的原则”,有民主原则吗?

所以该组织的提议是非常不合逻辑的。再说沙砂不是马来亚的一个州属,凭什么是以同一国州的算法。沙砂被强硬的加入马联邦已经是被马霸权绑手绑脚无法充分发挥。MA63协议是不平等协议。砂人照理是要有“一切以砂拉越为尊”。砂怎么会有这样款式的组织“一切以马来亚为尊”像行动党的思维模式呢?

我认为砂崛起这组织的“1人1票的原则”崛起对砂非常不利。我质疑这组织是否外来党的卧底。