没主权怎样谈独立？

没有主权的国家，就没有资格谈独立。

砂政盟在2023年庆祝在马联邦内庆祝60周年独立是不良示范，除非砂政府有他们暗里意图。

砂国兄弟，沙巴也跟随高喊沙巴在马联邦60年庆祝独立。这行动也太离谱了。

被霸权贱踏脚下60年，沙砂政府要庆祝什么？这是哪一种模型的独立？大家不觉得这是天底下最大的笑话吗？

天化小学董事本固鲁杨庆顺在天化小学集会上说砂拉越和马来西亚是完美结合的成果。我不知道他是以什么标准来下这结论。

我不知道他是否看到马半岛的进步繁荣就是相等于砂拉越的进步繁荣。

马半岛的进步繁荣建立在砂沙的贫穷上是合情合理的吗？

这简直是误导小朋友，很没道德。好像被利益熏心，神智不清的乱说一通。

同样的问题是泗里街睦邻委员会向泗里街5间幼儿园派送海盗旗去误导小小朋友。真是没没道德。

难道他真的不知道砂实际上是被马半岛殖民60年吗？砂是不间断的被掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫和霸凌。

马来西亚（先不说合不合法）是三国联邦，平等伙伴关系。可是他们是从来没有尊重沙砂为平等伙伴关系。

马来亚独立66年跟砂拉越没有半毛钱关系。咱们砂人像傻人每年帮他们大事庆祝一番。在马联邦内，咱们砂拉越是走霉运，资源是不间断被掠夺去发展马半岛和让高端政客致富。

说722是砂的独立日，有法律支撑吗？

916是马来西亚成立日，也是砂拉越的国殇日，失去主权而受控于联邦。

砂拉越从1841年到1941年是一个独立的国家。美国在大概1853年就承认砂为国；英国10后也承认砂的地位。

是的，砂人不可忘记砂的爱国义士是如何对抗被残杀和砂是如何强迫参组马联邦。

这么多年来去，咱们是被严重洗脑而变得今天这种不懂得耻辱的亡国奴。

他似乎不知道马来西亚就是马来亚更名。这在联合国文案内是有记录的。

马来西亚协议是否合法成立马来西亚暂时不谈论。

土地税飙涨

乡区地转为城市地，更新费飙涨25倍

乡区地每英亩期限60年更新费是200令吉。但是转为城市地时，每英亩期限60是5000令吉。每英亩飙涨25倍，相等于2,500%，也太暴利了吧！

个案是石角地主，陈先生，有2.2英亩土地到2026年12月到期，申请延长地契，告知必须缴费11,000令吉。

他的隔壁地主，一年前更新两英亩多土地，才缴付500令吉。

砂土地局部长Tengah Ali 做事太轻率了吧。太着重商业回报。砂资源超级丰富，每个砂民皆有份。

请参考阿联酋等国，为什么没课土地税！砂政盟的砂人优先口号几时可以落实？

砂民集体应该以反暴利税采取法律行动起诉砂政府。

据我所知，商家暴利回馈一定会面对反暴利法律制裁。

这就有邀请张部长先在砂议会内要求改善土地课税法典。如果行不通，就帮乡区和城市地主提交反暴利税诉讼。

种种土地课税，我猜是来自土地局提案，但是，为何在砂议会可以如此轻易通过？这土地课税完全是跟民间脱节。完全以商业利益做考量。政府变得太商业化是致命的。

民间NGOs一大堆，为什么都没集体反对活动？

在位执政60,年砂政盟，前身砂国阵，真的，太横行霸道了！。

Know our rightful Rights

Someone were upset with Britain decision during British Colony time.... Do you know your rightfully RIGHTS granted by Britain to Sarawak & Sabah? Here are some facts & truth!

Truth is Sarawak & Sabah lands origin belong to Brunei Darussalam. Why Malaya was given the right to form Sabah & Sarawak as Formation of Malaysia? Sarawak & Sabah were ruled by White Raja, it inevitable the culture are Britian even education system. Why the five Sultans monarchy of Malaya greed for Sultan of Brunei Darussalam's land? 

Understand? Let go five Sultans monarchy of Malaya. Sabah & Sarawak lands origin is from Sultan Brunei Darussalam and given to Sir James Brooke. During the assassination of the white Governor, Britain quickly part Sabah & Sarawak in the Constitution to be part of Malaya to Form Malaysia and declared independence in 1963.

When you are borned Sarawakian & Sabahan your privileges are upfront Gazetted by Britian as English your official language in court and in Sarawak governance. All Sarawakian lawyers should know. There are privileges as Sarawakian & Sabahan but due to the jealousy of Malaya states people. Why Sarawak has Oil & Gas loyalty? When you understand then you will stand for your rightfully RIGHTS!

We are fighting in differences in cultures & religions now. 

 Root causes: Extremists and Terrorism become the culprits.

===================================

Title: *Don't wish me Happy Sarawak Day. Don't wish me Happy Sarawak Independence day either.*

-------------------------------------------

Sarawak independence is just a feel good feeling amongst nationalist!!

As a former colony of Britain, there was no act pass in UK's parliament to grant us independence.

So, don't wish me Happy Sarawak Day.

Don't wish me Happy Sarawak Independnce day either.

Because that would be twisting history n historically wrong!

Was Sarawak ever independent? 

Did the British ever declared us an independent country in the British Parliament,?

*Fact is, Sarawak was handed to Malaya on a silver platter, gifted to Malayans to continue the colonisation of Sarawak from Britain to Malaya.*

The damn Cobbold Commission was a farce. 

It was created so the world would think that the people of Sarawak agreed for Sarawak to form the federation of Malaysia along with Singapore, Sabah, and Malaya.

In other words, we were forced, or rather duped to become a colony of Malaya by the damn accursed British.

We should stop fooling ourselves that we were once independent on 22/7/963 because we never was independent.

Instead of saying Happy Sarawak Day, or Happy Sarawak Independence Day, why not call it "Free Sarawak from Malaya Colonialists" 

Or "No to to Neo Malayan Colonialists"

That would be more accurate than celebrating an event which never occurred!

Let's be direct instead of beating around the bush. Let's all for Sarawak to be independent not only on 22/7 but everyday if need be

On 22/7, l did not see any posters that say "FREE SARAWAK FROM MALAYA".

Why?

I am not against celebrating Independence day but it must be celebrated in the right context.

Ask l had mentioned earlier, I would not celebrate 22/7 as we were not and never independent from Britain. Britain never officially gave independence to Sarawak but their intention was to release us from bondage and into the mouth of a waiting crocodile named Malaya, who happily swallowed us up, lock stock n barrel.

And yet here we are happily celebrating a lie. Every year since 22/7 was declared a state holiday by Adenan Satem.

So l have to be honest with myself here. I would be happy to join in a celebration that is themed *For or Towards Sarawak Independence day* 

and not " Sarawak Independence Day on 22/7."

Like a divorce in a civil marriage, it must be recognised by both parties (husband n wife) and the JPN as witness for it to be legal.

 I can only conclude that we were fooled by the British colonial government. 

So here's to the British government...UP YOURS FOR DECEIVING us.

May your country be overrun by a migrant population soon and a foreign religion. When that happens, I will laugh, not cry.

From history.com, THIS DAY IN HISTORY August 15, 1947, India and Pakistan win independence: 

“The Indian Independence Bill, which carves the independent nations of India and Pakistan out of the former Mogul Empire, comes into force at the stroke of midnight on August 15, 1947.

*The British Prime Minister, Clement Attlee, introduced the Indian Independence Bill in the House of Commons on 4 July 1947. It was passed by both the houses of the British Parliament on 15 July 1947. It received Royal Assent on 18 July 1947.*

No such act was passed in the British parliament to grant Sarawak Independence in 1963 and neither was Royal Assent granted by the British monarch as a colony of the crown.

We, multi-racial Chinese, Iban & sabahan natives have been FOOLED.

刘惟诚：MA63被忽视50年

刘惟诚：被忽视近50年，政治动荡摇醒MA63

刘惟诚是拉曼大学媒体中文系讲师。他是砂人在马半岛20多年。

他分享他对MA63的看法。我有我的意见，认同和不认同他的看法。

说MA48马来亚联合邦和MA63是一样的都是建国协议。我很不认同。

因为MA48协议是马半岛各州协议。然而，MA63是在不同土地上的国家协议是国际协议。

沙砂是在千多海里外，是英国政府以强硬手段组合的。

在1960年12月14日，联合国大会通过1514号和1541号决议。1514决议是赋予个人自决权和1541号集体决定权是否要（一）独立；（二）联邦和（三）合并。

马来亚和英国完全没给沙砂公投取决下就在1963年9月16日成立马来西亚联邦。

新加坡经过一番努力，在1965年成功脱马独立。他不是被驱逐的。因为李有准备［分离协议］和［独立宣言］亲自要求东姑签名，以防止东姑出尔反尔，不守承诺。

当时砂民也想脱马独立，可是马联邦采用残暴不仁的手段打压砂民。马联邦用内安法令，煽动法令还有紧急法令压制砂民。

当时国民党领袖黄金明要求检讨MA63 之类，就被判入狱3年。说砂人对MA63没太深感触是很不逻辑的。

砂国阵是联邦国阵的一份子是完全没有空间索权。

马联邦政治运作是全盘殖民沙砂计划。从东姑拼吞计划；Tun Razak提呈石油发展法令95%联邦：沙砂各5%。意在掠夺石油沙砂资源和Tun Hussein 提议把沙砂从邦国贬成州，意在殖民。

到马哈迪任相，他更是无法无天，贪得无厌打抢沙砂资源。他制造贪污舞弊滥权腐败的政治生态环境。从此巫统国阵就上了不归路。

从2018年开始，马联邦就被砂掐脖子了。砂联盟启动索权机制，要回属砂所有自主权。

在2011年，Najib 为配合联合国职位要求取消内安法令。在2012生效后，砂民运就崛起了。MA63也就大公开。民运分子更是大挖掘砂历史。砂第五任首长Adenan Satem 是大力支持民运，大大增强索权力量。

归还属砂的自主权本来就是天经地义的事。

在2021年，总于修宪复邦，恢复沙砂邦国地位。可是2023年财政预算案对沙砂所分配的联邦发展拨款还是偏差太大。马半岛拨款是869亿令吉而沙砂只有121亿令吉。

马联邦是一群不讲道义，完全不公正，公平，正当，正确，正直----不遵循正轨道行事，所以，才有今天乱78糟的政治状况。

沙砂脱离马联邦是迟早的事。

Anwar must be able to accept criticism

https://focusmalaysia.my/sarawakian-activist-anwar-must-be-able-to-accept-criticism-allow-social-activists-to-perform-their-function/

Aug 24,2023

https://dayakdaily.com/peter-john-pm-anwar-needs-to-allow-activists-to-carry-out-obligations-acknowledge-criticism/

*PRIME Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim must stand by his promises of Reformasi viz the creation of a multi-cultural and representative government instead of resorting to scare tactics that are not acceptable in a functioning democracy when he is being criticised.

Sarawak social activist Peter John Jaban made the call today in light of the treatment of two fellow activists Arun Dorasamy and S. Shashi Kumar who were hauled up by Bukit Aman Police over Anwar’s role in solemnising the conversion of a Hindu man into Islam recently.

“Our PM needs to accept the critique and address it. That is the nature of public service. He needs to remember that he represents his office. He represents Malaysia as a nation,” Jaban who is also the Global Human Rights Federation Malaysia (GHRF) deputy president pointed out in a media statement.

“As the PM of a purportedly secular government, he cannot allow himself to be seen converting a young Hindu man on camera regardless of his personal beliefs and religious practice.

“Even worse, he cannot expect to curry favour with one sector of the voting public by doing so and then suppress outrage from another to maintain his position. Politics is perception and he has been long enough in the game to know this. He has made this a political act by performing this conversion in public.”

If the police are working on their own under a standard operating procedure (SOP) that remains from a previous time, then this is the perfect time for Anwar to take a stand, according to Jaban who is a long-time activist.

“This kind of action was the hallmark of the old Malaysia and lessons are not easily unlearned. But, in this case, lessons trickle down from the top,” he lamented.

“The police were attempting to seize Shashi’s phone in what was clearly a fishing expedition and an abuse of power against a man who had not been charged with any crime or indeed committed one. Thankfully, he knows his rights, another product of the existence and actions of activists through the decades.”

In essence, Jaban contended that Anwar needs to learn from this event and “to make sure that everyone who represents his administration does the same”.

“This is an opportunity, not a threat. He needs to listen more than he talks and he should separate his private life from political gain. Freedom of expression is an essential component of democracy and criticism an inevitable product of a political life,” added the Sarawakian activist. – Aug 24, 2023

NGOs Demand Malaysia Parliament Grant Independence for SS

NGOs Demand Malaysia Parliament Grant Independence For Sabah & Sarawak

非政府组织要求马来西亚议会给予沙巴和砂拉越独立

 https://www.newmediahit.com/ngos-demand-malaysia-parliament-grant-independence-for-sabah-sarawak/

Independence for Sabah and Sarawak ends internal colonisation and non-compliance on MA’63!

 沙巴和砂拉越的独立，就结束了内部殖民和不遵守MA’63！

The old news in 1963

Saw this old newspaper from 1963.

Sarawak first Chief Minister Stephen Kalong Ningkan nominated Temenggung Jugah as the governor of Sarawak but was rejected by Tunku Abdul Rahman.

Tunku said: "It was agreed that if the Chief Minister is a Dayak then the Governor should be a Malay. As such the Yang Di-pertuan Agong would not be able to accept Temenggung Jugah's appointment."

Credits :Pages Home in Sarawak