Anwar must be able to accept criticism

https://focusmalaysia.my/sarawakian-activist-anwar-must-be-able-to-accept-criticism-allow-social-activists-to-perform-their-function/

Aug 24,2023

https://dayakdaily.com/peter-john-pm-anwar-needs-to-allow-activists-to-carry-out-obligations-acknowledge-criticism/

*PRIME Minister (PM) Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim must stand by his promises of Reformasi viz the creation of a multi-cultural and representative government instead of resorting to scare tactics that are not acceptable in a functioning democracy when he is being criticised.

Sarawak social activist Peter John Jaban made the call today in light of the treatment of two fellow activists Arun Dorasamy and S. Shashi Kumar who were hauled up by Bukit Aman Police over Anwar’s role in solemnising the conversion of a Hindu man into Islam recently.

“Our PM needs to accept the critique and address it. That is the nature of public service. He needs to remember that he represents his office. He represents Malaysia as a nation,” Jaban who is also the Global Human Rights Federation Malaysia (GHRF) deputy president pointed out in a media statement.

“As the PM of a purportedly secular government, he cannot allow himself to be seen converting a young Hindu man on camera regardless of his personal beliefs and religious practice.

“Even worse, he cannot expect to curry favour with one sector of the voting public by doing so and then suppress outrage from another to maintain his position. Politics is perception and he has been long enough in the game to know this. He has made this a political act by performing this conversion in public.”

If the police are working on their own under a standard operating procedure (SOP) that remains from a previous time, then this is the perfect time for Anwar to take a stand, according to Jaban who is a long-time activist.

“This kind of action was the hallmark of the old Malaysia and lessons are not easily unlearned. But, in this case, lessons trickle down from the top,” he lamented.

“The police were attempting to seize Shashi’s phone in what was clearly a fishing expedition and an abuse of power against a man who had not been charged with any crime or indeed committed one. Thankfully, he knows his rights, another product of the existence and actions of activists through the decades.”

In essence, Jaban contended that Anwar needs to learn from this event and “to make sure that everyone who represents his administration does the same”.

“This is an opportunity, not a threat. He needs to listen more than he talks and he should separate his private life from political gain. Freedom of expression is an essential component of democracy and criticism an inevitable product of a political life,” added the Sarawakian activist. – Aug 24, 2023

NGOs Demand Malaysia Parliament Grant Independence for SS

NGOs Demand Malaysia Parliament Grant Independence For Sabah & Sarawak

非政府组织要求马来西亚议会给予沙巴和砂拉越独立

 https://www.newmediahit.com/ngos-demand-malaysia-parliament-grant-independence-for-sabah-sarawak/

Independence for Sabah and Sarawak ends internal colonisation and non-compliance on MA’63!

 沙巴和砂拉越的独立，就结束了内部殖民和不遵守MA’63！

The old news in 1963

Saw this old newspaper from 1963.

Sarawak first Chief Minister Stephen Kalong Ningkan nominated Temenggung Jugah as the governor of Sarawak but was rejected by Tunku Abdul Rahman.

Tunku said: "It was agreed that if the Chief Minister is a Dayak then the Governor should be a Malay. As such the Yang Di-pertuan Agong would not be able to accept Temenggung Jugah's appointment."

Credits :Pages Home in Sarawak

李光耀回忆录

李光耀回憶录，第一章，开头就这样寫着；

“....新加坡的独立卻是强加在它头上的....”,話雖是这么說，然而李光耀巧妙的運用一係例策略与动作，还有他的高尚品德致使他不曾和砂沙首长一样同汚合流，高喊'Ya betul, ya betul'，所以今天新加坡才不在马联邦懷抱之中，其实不会令人惊奇的。

李光耀回忆录第一章第十六段，“在我们和敦拉扎克进行談判三个星期里.....”

第八段 “特地要求東姑

在声明上亲自簽名，......他们无法改变主意。”

从这两段話，我们得知，独立並非一蹴而就，而是经过艰难的暗中談判，还有李光耀的去意已决，坚持要独立的決心就表現出他特地要求東姑在声明中亲自簽名，以免后者日后生变反悔。在这过程中，新马双方同意于1965年8月7日签署分离协议致使新加坡同年8月9日宣布独立並终止为马联邦的成员国。

同年8月9日，上午十点正，新加坡广播电台广播员庄严地讀出独立宣言，与此同时，政府也分發特别宪報号外让人民知道新加坡已经脱馬独立了。另一边廂，正在此時，馬联邦国会还在辩論新国方案，时至下午四点半才对外宣布新加坡被踢出联邦。人家新加坡早早就遠走高飞，轻舟已过万重山，馬来亚才来一个马后炮，說前者被踢出联邦，这样本未倒置的說詞合逻輯嗎？令人伩服嗎？

时至今日，新加坡是否被踢，大家細讀李光耀回忆錄之后自可思考判断。转载

“绿潮”來了，距砂“近了”

“绿潮”来了，距砂“近了” ---赖耀松

赖评论马半岛6州选举的成绩单。土伊联手在团结政府的三个定存州：森美兰，槟城和雪兰莪大有斩获，总共赢得38个议席。反观希巫联手在吉打，吉兰丹和登嘉楼，只获得5个席位。

在砂拉越的砂民是隔岸观火，看得触目惊心，种族宗教偏激走邪，真的大行其道。不是说邪不胜正，怎么如此给人的印象是反其道而行之，是邪恶当道，有那股阴气深深的。

英国殖民政府真的造孽硬把沙砂加入千多公里外的马半岛。今天，沙砂被拖进泥沼地，真的是苦不堪言。

砂政府有着3分之二优势执政，应该采取脱马独立，在马联邦，砂根本没有任何希望全面自由发展。

安华首相接下来是否要和国盟大比拼。 安华首相个人立场可以摇摆不定，但是公正党标榜公正，改革，昌明是否立场坚定。

火箭党标志正义，正当，正确，正直。。。不能也钟摆不定吧！

砂政盟标签砂优先，半岛政治生态环境对砂非常不利，砂政盟对安华首相所作所为言行，不能视而不见。

安华首相改革能力薄弱，不堪一击。对于大专生土族固打制，他的思维还是照旧操作，无法突破。一改革，怕团结政府权力旁落。

对承认统考课题还是照旧不承认，以［保持不变应万变］。

固打制和死都不承认统考，根本不管，不理全力支持公正党的马半岛华裔的感受。可是，公正党领头羊不公正的对待华裔的感受公正公平吗？

联合政府预计会向其国会提呈修正和回教法庭355法案。这还不够证明安华首相开拓种族和宗教化的决心吗？

昌明大马的口号还能同时落实吗？

马半岛，真的要把改革开放希望寄托给Muda 会更实在可靠。

记得，支持更好的，更正当，更正确，更正直，更公正，正义，正气的的政党。还有，记得，有竞争，才会有进步。

大小家加油！

还原砂历史

还原砂历史

马来西亚计划是阿都拉曼或李光耀主意？

嗯，都不是。阿都拉曼连想都没有想到。

S李当时极度想跟马来亚合并以借用他们的军事力量来清除左翼分子保护S。他知道古巴是如何被人民推翻的。

可是巫统完全不同意因为S当时华人人口占据70%加入后，华人人数会比马来人还多，这会影响马来人政权。

于是S李才想到英国婆罗洲三邦殖民地，这些地方的人口结构可抵消巫统的顾虑。

于是他便向英国殖民政府提出他的看法。这完全符合英国的全盘计划。其实，英国政府老早就有这计划，只是还没提出。

在1960年12月14日，联合国大会通过［去殖民化宣言］。世界列强对殖民地的控制不得不放手。

对沙砂拥有超级丰富资源，英国还是想分一杯羹，还有沙砂的地理位置对英国未来发展也是很重要，还有，还有，他们不要共产党在东南亚强大起来，等等等等的因素，所以，英政府老早1950年代就在计划中。

S李对新加坡的处境焦虑不安，所以才如此积极，努力，以他三寸不烂之舌说服沙砂政府参组。

这过程，其实，都是英政府霸权一手包办，沙砂集体人民完全没有参与讨论的分。

他们完全忽视人联党在不到两星期内收到11万4000人的签名。英政府一意孤行。

按照英政府的时间表想赶在8月31日宣布马来西亚成立。早在1963年7月9日，沙砂指定人马去伦敦签署马协议。

当时印尼和菲律宾也反对他们完全没有给沙砂人民公投下成立。

于是联合国派遣调查团来调查，结果不了了之。

在1963年9月16日，他们就迫不及待宣布马来西亚联邦正式成立。

在充满争议的沙巴主权问题和砂拉越激烈反对都不理睬下成立。

所以，马来西亚联邦解散的问题是迟早的事。

7 Questions Malays Should Ask...

*From Mariam Mokhtar :-*👍👌

*Seven Questions Malays Should Ask Their Leaders.*

*1. HOW COME AFTER 60 YEARS WE ARE STILL BEHIND THE OTHER MALAYSIANS?*

Are We Stupid Or Are You – Our Leaders – That after over half a century you have still not got it right?

The Malays In Singapore Are By And Large Better Off Than Us yet they do not have Bumiputraism. 

Why not learn from them?

The wealth gap intra the Malay Community is much wider than that of the other communities. We have Super Rich Malays while most of us struggle to make ends meet.

*Are these rich Malays so much cleverer or more hard working than the rest of us?*

Or is it because *they have used their positions and connections to enrich themselves at our expense?*

*2. WOULD IT BE TRUE THAT IF “AFFIRMATIVE ACTION” IS BASED ON NEEDS AND NOT ON RACE THERE WILL BE MORE FOR US POOR MALAYS?*

After all since the Rich Malays can afford to support their children’s education why are they taking scholarships?

Every place they take means one less place for a poor student.

And how does giving us discount on buying shares help us. Most of us cannot understand the stock market and even if we did, we have no spare money to play the share market. This benefits the rich Malays only but not us.

Same for housing we can only afford one house if at all, while the rich can buy many. 

Now If House Purchase Discounts were given strictly on the basis of needs and not race, then perhaps House Prices Can Come Down because of the lower holding cost for developers. This will benefit us.

*3. YOU KEEP TELLING US THE CHINESE ARE OUR ENEMIES; THAT THEY STEAL FROM US AND THAT IF NOT FOR YOU WE WOULD BECOME EXTINCT.*

How did the Chinese steal from us and how are they going to make us extinct? *Explain . . .!?!*

Are you not using them to scare us so that we run to you?

*4. ON EDUCATION: WHY ARE EVEN OUR FELLOW MALAYS LEAVING THE NATIONAL SCHOOLS AND GOING TO CHINESE SCHOOLS???* 

*ARE THEY TELLING YOU SOMETHING?*

Why is Religion so much an element in our schools. Should we not have more time on subjects that prepare our children for the workplace – to cari makan?

And if as you keep telling us that we have the Best Education why are you sending your children to private schools and overseas universities? 

Why are our universities ranked so low?

We want good public universities led by good vice chancellors; we don’t care about his race. Yet you play politics with our children’s future by not appointing the best, but using race as a criteria.

*5. TO OUR RELIGIOUS LEADERS:*

*WHY IS THE ISLAM PRACTISED IN MANY ISLAMIC COUNTRIES MORE LIBERAL AND OPEN THAN OURS .. ?!?*

*WORDS YOU FORBID THE INFIDELS TO USE ARE USED OPENLY BY NON-MUSLIMS EVEN IN ARABIC COUNTRIES.*

I Hear That In Indonesia There Are Siblings Of Different Faiths In The Same Family. 

That *A Muslim Can Marry A Christian Without Either Converting From Their Religion*

*Explain Al Baqara 256: There is no compulsion in religion?*

And why do you think we are we so Weak In Our Faith that we can be so easily confused, or influenced by the sign of the cross, or Christians celebrating their festivals that you forbid us to even convey our festive greetings to them? Or not allow them to enjoy their Oktober Fest as we consider it haram. 

*Who Are You/We To Impose Our Beliefs On Others.* How did we become so intolerant?

*Why is it that you make a fuss of how our women (or other women) dress and trivial matters like that?*

*Yet you close your eyes to the corruption that goes on?* 

*You say nothing about how our leaders have cheated us*

*Has your silence been bought by the fat pay you get????*

*6. YOU SCOLD US FOR BEING LAZY AND CALL US USELESS – THAT WE CANNOT WALK WITHOUT A TONGKAT.*

*YET YOU KEEP PUSHING THE TONGKAT ON US. WHY?*

Is it to keep us Dependent on you? Are you afraid that if we can think for ourselves and stand on our own feet without you we can make up our minds what is good or bad?

*7. WHY DO THE OLDER GENERATION MALAYSIANS GET ON SO MUCH BETTER WITH EACH OTHER AND WE DO NOT? IS IT THE SCHOOL SYSTEM?*

Or Is it the less extreme and more tolerant Islam in their day? 

My Grandmother did not wear a Tudung yet she is a Good Muslim. My Grandfather sat in the coffeeshops with his Chinese and Indian Kakis and no one made a fuss.

*Have You Brainwashed Us To Hate The Non-Malays?*

I do not care about race; and religion is a personal matter – Between Me And Allah. I do not want to be used as a Pawn to *Further Your Own Selfish Agenda.* 

All I want is a good job and peace and harmony. I want a good education for my children so that they too can have a bright future.

I look at our Malay Brothers in Sarawak and Sabah and envy them for their racial harmony and how they enjoy each other. 

My Grandfather tells me that we were like that once. I want to be like that again.

It is not the Non-Malays who do not want to mix with us. *It’s us who want to be exclusive and that works to our detriment.*

Don’t Play Racial Politics with our lives so you can Divide and Rule, and enrich yourself at our expense.

You can fool some of us all the time and all us some of the time, but you cannot fool all of us all the time.

*Explain Why You Have Failed After 60 Years Of Trying.*