Malaysia -Where Apartheid Is Legal

MALAYSIA - WHERE APARTHEID IS LEGAL

WHY IS GPS CONTINUING TO SUPPORT UMNO KETUANAN MELAYU POLICIES?

With the general election around the corner, should you think about who to vote for with your vote? Read the following 104 BN’s treatment of non-Bumiputera issues before making a decision:

 1) Of the six major commercial banks in our country, only two are multi-racial, and the rest are controlled by Malays.

 2) The directors of Petronas are 99% Malay.

 3) Only 3% of Petronas employees are non-Bumiputera.

 4) According to statistics in 2000: In Malaysia, 99% of the petrol stations of Petronas belong to Malays.

 5) All Petronas contractors must be 100% Bumiputera status.

 6) There is no non-Bumiputera who are required to work in Malay companies under the Quota Act. However, 30% of employees in general public companies must be Malay.

 7) All police, nurses, military, new non-indigenous admission rate is only 5%.

 8) The current percentage of non-Bumiputera employees in the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) is 2%, down from 40% in 1960 to just 2% today.

 9) The proportion of Putrajaya non-bumiputera civil servants is 2% while Malays make up 98%.

 10) In 2004, the percentage of non-Bumiputera civil servants in the entire government of our country was 7%, down from 30% in 1960 to only 7% today.

 11) 95% of government contracts go to Malays.

 12) Licensees of all businesses such as Taxi Permit (Permit), Approval Permit (AP) etc. 100% controlled by Malays.

 13) 80% of the non-Bumiputera rice and flour business in Kedah in the 1980s had to be sold to Malays. Otherwise, the government will make this business difficult.

 14) Since the 1970s to the present, there are 100 large non-bumiputera companies taken over by the government or Malays, such as UTC, UMBC and D&C (RHB), MAYBANK, MISC, Malayan Bank (AFG), Amal Bank (MBF) ), Southern Bank (CIMB), MMC, GAMUDA, MALAYA SUGAR, JERNEH, PELANGI, SUNRISE, IJMLAND, etc. MALAYA SUGAR, JERNEH, PELANGI are Guo Lao's company.

 15) At least 10 non-bumiputera bus companies in Malaysia over the past 40 years were sold to Malays or other transport companies due to refusal by government authorities to renew bus routes for new bus routes and refusal to apply routes for non-bumiputeras.

 16) Non-Bumiputera taxi drivers are banned from driving at the Larkin bus station in Johor. The reason given by the authorities was to destroy the taxi club.

 17) In November 2004, non-Bumiputeras were not given shop space at the new bus station in Muar at all.

 18) Over the past 34 years, the total amount of RM800 billion has entered the pockets of the Malays through government channels and statutory bodies such as ASN, MARA, Privatisation, Government New Economic Policy Agency, Hajj Fund, etc.

 19) 48 Chinese primary schools closed during 1968-2000.

 20) 144 Indian primary schools closed between 1968-2000.

 21) 2637 Malay primary schools were built during 1968-2000.

 22) The government budget for Chinese primary schools is 2.5%. Indian schools got only 1%, Malay schools got 96.5%.

 23) Although the salary (monthly salary) is only RM1000, Chinese parents cannot get school textbook loan. RM2000 salary (monthly salary) eligible Malay parents can get the loan.

 24) The vice-chancellors of all 10 government public universities are Malays.

 25) 5% of lecturers in government universities are non-Bumiputera. Between 1965 and 2004 this percentage dropped from 70% to just 5%.

 26) Over the past 40 years, only 5% of non-Bumiputeras have received government scholarships.

 27) No Chinese or Indians were sent to Japan and Korea during their studies in the East.

 28) In 2004, 128 of the best non-Indigenous students in STPM were unable to get into the department they aspired to, which is medicine.

 29) In early 2003 MARA gave 10% quota to non-Bumiputera but only 7% was filled. Before that MARA was 100% Malay.

 30) The 2003 National Service Program Cases included 50 cases of non-Bumiputera being assaulted in Malaysia.

 31) The Chinese population in Malaysia dropped from 45% in 1957 to 25% in 2004.

 32) The Indian population of Malaysia fell from 12% in 1957 to 7% in 2004.

 33) Two million Malaysian Chinese immigrants in the past 40 years.

 34) 500,000 Malaysian Indians emigrated over the past 40 years.

 35) Over the past 40 years, 3 million Indonesians have immigrated to Malaysia, becoming Malaysian citizens and enjoying bumiputera status.

 36) Over the past 40 years, 600,000 Chinese and Indians with red ID cards have been denied citizenship. Perhaps 60% of them died of old age. On the basis of racism, Indonesians got their citizenship easily compared to Chinese and Indians.

 37) Malays have 5% - 15% discount for buying houses, be it rich or poor Malays.

 38) The budget for rural development is 2% for non-Bumiputera new villages and 98% for Malay new villages.

 39) The names of at least 50 roads have been changed from Chinese names to other names.

 40) The Gan Boon Loong (Mahua) Hall in Melaka was changed to another name, but it has only been officially used for a few days. The government has tried to avoid non-indigenous names. This single example of racism occurred around 2000.

 41) Building churches or temples in each residential area were zero. However, at least one mosque or prayer room must be built in each residential area.

 42) Since 1970, 3000 mosques or prayer rooms have been built in all residential areas in Malaysia. No temple or church has to be built in a residential area.

 43) 20 years ago, a Catholic church applied for the construction of a church building in Shah Alam. But they were told by Malay authorities that the church building must look like a factory and not be built like a church. Applications as of 2004 have not been approved.

 44) The Bible is forbidden to be published in Iban (2002).

 45) Government TV stations (RTM1, RTM2, Third TV) are all without non-Bumiputera directors.

 46) 30 government produced TV series and movies always bad guys have non bumiputera faces and good guys have Malay faces. You can check the validation, from the 70's onwards. This has become a trend in recent years.

 47) At least 10 times, the Malays (especially Umno) have threatened to use the Malaysian method of 13 May 1969 to slaughter non-Bumiputeras.

 48) The 20 constituencies won by DAP will not receive development funding from the government. Most of these constituencies will be the last to be developed.

 49) 100 congressional districts that have been redefined by racial profiling to dilute the votes of non-Indigenous candidates. This is one of the main reasons why DAP candidates have lost seats in elections since the 1970s.

 50) Since 1960, only three of the 12 human rights have been sanctioned by the Malaysian government.

 51) Zero Racial Discrimination (United Nations - Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) has not been practiced by the Malaysian government since the 1960s.

 52) In 2003, there were 20 reported cases of Malay ambulance workers inhumanely treating non-Bumiputera critically ill patients, and government hospitals and Malay participants deliberately delaying treatment. Unreported cases may be 200.

 53) Every year, there are 50 cases of non-Bumiputera, especially non-Bumiputera youth, being beaten by Malay youths in public places. Police reports can be checked to verify this. As long as the police have a report, otherwise there is no record.

 54) Every year, there are 20 cases of non-Bumiputera drivers who accidentally run over Malays and are severely beaten or killed.

 55) Bumiputera ASNs get 12% per annum while bank fixed deposits are only about 3.5% per annum.

 56) The Bank Rakyat, set up by the government, has both "bumiputra" and "non-bumiputera" interest when it makes loans; it also borrows from the bank, but non-bumiputeras are charged higher fees.

 57) In 2010, Umno women’s group representative Sarifa demanded a 60% bumiputera quota.

 58) In 2008, the Federal Court approved the dismissal of the lawsuit filed by 184 pig farmers, Li Bai victims and their families against the government for RM136 million in compensation.

 59) TM's second-hand contractors for landline and broadband installations are 100% bumiputera.

 60) More than 90% of TM's national employees are bumiputera.

 61) More than 90% of National Energy's national employees are indigenous.

 62) The provident fund buys computers, and 100% of the beneficiary computer vendors are Bumiputeras.

 63) In 2008, Umno Sungai Horn state assemblyman Hamidah published "If we see snakes and Indians, we should print Indians first"

 64) In 2010, Nasir, the assistant to my country's first high-ranking official, made a statement that the Chinese mother-in-law came to Malaysia for prostitution and the Indians came to beg.

 65) In 2010, my country's second-highest official made remarks that the Chinese were not grateful.

 66) In 2010, the second highest official in our country made a statement that Malays are first and Malaysians are second.

 67) In 2010, the deputy director of the cadre training bureau published the theory of single eyelids and drunkards!

 68) Ahmad Ismail, a top Umno official in Penang, published his sojourn in 2008, and was named a "national hero" at the Congress in August 2010.

 69) In 2010, Umno supported non-Muslims to ban the word Allah, which led to the burning of churches.

 70) In 2010, a student at Sao Tomar Primary School in Sarawak was beaten 10 times by the vice-principal for carrying fried rice with pork sausages to school. The vice-principal apologized.

 71) In 2008, a temporary teacher in Malacca complained to Sin Chew Daily that she and her friends had not received the salary from the Ministry of Education from January to August.

 72) Luo Yalan, the former principal of Klang Chinese National High School, pointed out that the national Chinese high school with more Chinese than the independent middle school has insufficient funds and cannot use the government reserved land.

 73) The principal of the Kulai Middle School asked the Chinese students to return to China, and pointed out that the prayer ropes that the Indian students were wearing were like dog collars.

 74) There are racial remarks about the principal of Bugis Nanmao Middle School who "expelled" Chinese students and "returned to China".

 75) The teacher of Lugu Middle School insulted the candidates in public, and made the remarks that "Indians go back to India, and Chinese go back to China".

 76) In 2005, Zeng Wenheng, a teacher at Jihua K school, accidentally stepped on the floor suspected of being eaten by termites and fell from a height of 15 feet to his death.

 77) In 2006, Weng Shijie at the Muar Mausu Ji Fenghua Dinner, pointed out that the government's approval for the construction of the Chinese primary school was misused. After the 30,000-to-3,000 change was revealed, Hishammuddin angrily accused Weng Shijie of "nosy".

 78) West Malaysian developers are required to reserve 20% of the housing units for Bumiputera Malays in each project.

 79) The quota for indigenous housing in the state of Malacca is the highest in the country, reaching as high as 60%.

 80) The government stipulates a 15% discount for bumiputeras buying houses over 500,000 yuan. Zhaocheng's indigenous poor are getting poorer, and the rich are getting richer! Mr. Pan Jianwei, a member of the People's Bank of China, suggested the revision, but he was afraid of being shot by bullets.

 81) The "Sarawak Report" stated that Taib, through its authority, sold Orang Asli land to a family company at a low price and made a net profit of tens of millions.

 82) The real indigenous "Kayang tribe" in the land occupied by the Bakun Dam used up their life savings to sue the Sarawak state government, and they once angrily said they would blow up the Bakun Dam in order to protect their homes.

 83) Penan human rights activist Nick Kelasau said that the Bakun Dam had caused Penan people to lose their homes. He also quoted Taib as saying that the authorities did not build schools because Penan people, like animals, have no culture, so they do not need to learn.

 84) Over the past few years, Penan girls have been sexually assaulted by loggers in the remote Baram community. The youngest girl who was sexually assaulted was only 10 years old.

 85) The aboriginal documentary "Frontline" was ordered by the authorities to be banned during the Sibu by-election after two episodes, which eventually turned into a turmoil of Zhou Zenan's immediate dismissal.

 86) In 2009, Zhao Mingfu, a young man of Chinese descent, died tragically in the MACC building. The cause of his death is unknown.

 87) In 2010, the Minister of Defense pointed out that the ratio of Chinese and Indians in the military is low, and they may not be patriotic.

 88) In 2010, Tamandran of Indian descent was tortured for 59 days for refusing to admit to the crime of stealing two fighter jet engines.

 89) Cases of non-Bumiputera beatings by police and financially missing for no apparent reason have been heard over the past 40 years. The latest one is Chinese, and the victim is Xie Zhenxing, a 34-year-old photo frame shop owner.

 90) Over the past 40 years, there have been more than 2,000 non-Bumiputera deaths without trial in police temporary housing.

 91) There are still 66,000 Orang Asli in East Malaysia who do not have citizenship.

 92) TNB intends to build a coal-fired power plant in Sabah that pollutes the environment. Its report misleads the public, including by mistaking the local residents of the Sungai and Didung as Indonesians, when in fact these groups are the indigenous people of Sabah.

 93) A possible casino in Vienna, Sabah, has 44 gaming licenses and more than 425 slot machines.

 94) In addition to the federal government's corporate and personal income tax, only Sabahans need to pay a special tax to MPOB to subsidize cooking oil nationwide.

 95) In 2010, in the case of suspension of work on the Kudat Mazu statue in Sabah, the decision of the Court of Appeal was upheld by the Federal Court.

 96) In 2007, BN ordered the demolition of a Hindu temple in Shah Alam two days before Deepavali, sparking Hindraf demonstrations.

 97) In 2007, the Melaka City Council, riot squads and police demolished the Hindu temple in the state of Tember Bay. The Hindus petitioned in front of the chief minister's office and demanded 500,000 yuan in compensation for the destruction of the temple and 100,000 yuan as a reconstruction fee.

 98) In 1984, the height of the Avalokitesvara Buddha statue in Kek Lok Temple was originally 120 feet, but the Barisan Nasional government at that time only approved the construction of 72 feet. The Barisan Nasional government also stated that the Buddha statues should not be open in the open air, and must have a roof, not only a cover, but also a beaded curtain for the octagonal pavilion.

 99) In 2010, the 80-year-old Kluang Longdu Palace was forcibly relocated. The area of ​​Longdu Palace was the pig slaughtering farm that year. In the past two years, because of the high land price, it was classified as "indigenous reserve".

 100) In 2010, the Orang Asli Care Center pointed out that more than 5 Orang Asli churches were demolished by the authorities in West Malaysia.

 101) In December 1991, if the Chinese community in Johor Bahru had not fought to the end, the Johor century-old temple would have been demolished long ago. Although the Chinese community in Johor Bahru fought to the end, in the end, the temple gate of the ancient Johor temple was still not guaranteed!

 102) The Johor state government intends to buy back the Johor Equity Trust at the original price of RM1, but this is only for Bumiputera investors. For non-Bumiputeras, they can only be sold back to the authorities for 50 sen.

 103) More than 90% of the clerks at the cronies' 7-Eleven convenience store are indigenous.

 104) The hospital's medicine and food suppliers are 100% Malay.

Who betrayed Sarawak?

😱

*History of how SUPP/BN surrendered our Sarawak MA63 rights* 

👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿👇🏿

*Article from theSundaily Abdul Aziz Isa*

TO restore the rightful status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners to the States of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia, at least 148 votes in the Dewan Rakyat and 47 votes in the Dewan Negara are required.

Given the current political scenario in our country, achieving this is nearly impossible, unless all sides of the political spectrum agree to such an amendment.

However, the question is why do we need to restore the rightful status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners to the States of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia?

Has the status of Sabah and Sarawak been unequal to the State of Malaya in the Federation of Malaysia?

If we are equal, then why do we need to amend the Federal Constitution and what was our original status in the Federation of Malaysia?.

To answer this, we need to look back at what happened at 3:40 pm on July 12, 1976.

The then Prime Minister Datuk Hussein Onn stood up to disarm parliamentarians by characterising the first reading of the amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution as merely ‘rearranging the names of the Federation’ (menyusun semula nama-nama negeri yang di dalam Persekutuan).

However, at that particular of time, the bill was not only to amend Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution but also other extensive amendment packages such as Article 3(3), 5(4) & (30), 12(2), 24(2), 25(1)(a) & (2), 32(2), 33(1), 34(2) & (6), 42(10), 48(1), 54(1) & (2), 65(2), 106(2), 111(2), PART XI, Eight Schedule, Ninth Schedule etc.

No other country in this world had made such extensive amendment packages at one time.

After Hussein finished his first reading, Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Kota Melaka) stood up to give his lengthy debate as to why the opposition particularly DAP opposed the amendment bill.

He concluded that the bill constitute serious erosions of fundamental liberties of Malaysians and negates the Rule of Law by providing unjustifiable retrospective legislation.

The following day on July 13, 1976, the bill went for the second reading.

At 3:45 pm, Datuk Patinggi Abdul Rahman Haji Ya’kub (the then Chief Minister and MP for Payang) stood up to support the amendment bill tabled by the Prime Minister.

However, in his speech, he didn’t elaborate much on the purpose of the amendment for Article 1(2) but in Para. 4, Para. 8, and Para. 9, he referred Sarawak as ‘Negeri’ even before the amendment bill was passed.

At 5:15pm, Datuk Stephen Yong Kuet Tze (MP for Padawan) stood up to support the amendment bill but did not touch on the purpose of the amendment for Article 1(2).

At 6:12pm, Latip Bris (MP for Mukah) stood up to support amendment bill without prejudice and throughout his speech, he only referred to Sarawak as ‘Negeri’.

At 6:46pm, once again the Prime Minister stood up to do his winding-up speech for the second reading.

When the bill went through the third and final reading, it was supported by 130 MPs and opposed by 4 MPs.

Surprisingly, not known to history, those MPs who opposed the third and final reading of the bill was Lim Kit Siang (DAP-Kota Melaka), Dr Tan Chee Koon (Pekemas-Batu), Farn Seong Than (DAP-Sungai Besi) and Lee Lam Thye (DAP-Bukit Bintang).

What transpired in the Parliament Hansard dated July 13th, 1976 shows that, despite knowing the fact that the constitutional amendment of Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution will downgrade the status of Sabah and Sarawak as merely 12th and 13th states within the Federation of Malaysia, MPs from Sabah and Sarawak were the ones who supported the amendment.

It has been proven from the very beginning that DAP is the only political party (then and now) consistently defending the rights of Sabah and Sarawak.

Bornean MPs the true saviours?

Back then, Dewan Rakyat had 154 MPs with 24 MPs from Sarawak and 16 MPs from Sabah.

To amend the Federal Constitution at that time, it required 104 votes in the Dewan Rakyat. In other words, to defeat the constitutional amendment bill, it would take only 52 votes or 12 more on top of all Borneo parliamentarians.

In theory, the constitutional amendment bill could have been defeated if and only all 40 MPs from Borneo joined the remaining four MPs from the opposition bench (DAP and Pekemas) as well as another eight MPs from Peninsular Malaysia to oppose the bill.

But in reality, truth hurts, it was our local MPs from Sabah and Sarawak who joined the rest of the MPs from Peninsular Malaysia to support the constitutional amendment bill which eventually downgraded the status of Sabah and Sarawak as merely the 12th and 13th states within the Federation of Malaysia.

Those MPs from Sarawak who supported the constitutional amendment bill were Patrick anak Uren (Bau-Lundu), Tan Sri Ong Kee Hui (Bandar Kuching), Dr Sulaiman Haji Daud (Santubong), Datuk Amar Haji Abdul Taib bin Mahmud (Samarahan), Datuk Stephen Yong Kuet Tze (Padawan), Richard Damping anak Laki (Serian), Haji Hadadak bin Haji D. Pasauk (Simunjan), Edwin anak Tangkun (Batang Lupar), Jonathan Narwin anak Jinggong (Lubok Antu), Liben anak Kato (Betong), Edmund Langau anak Saga (Saratok), Chieng Tiong Kai (Sarikei), Datuk Patinggi Haji Abdul Rahman bin Ya’kub (Payang), Wee Heo Soon (Bandar Sibu), Jawan anak Empaling (Rajang), Latip bin Haji Dris (Mukah), Thomas Salang Siden (Julau), Penghulu Abit anak Angkin (Kapit), Sibat anak Tagong (Ulu Rejang), Yang Siew Siang (Miri-Subis), Luhat Wan (Baram) and Racha Umong (Limbang-Lawas). While the remaining two MPs, Leo Moggie anak Irok (Kanowit) and Ting Ling Kiew (Bintulu), were absent.

Conclusion

We have seen many times how Barisan Nasional (BN) Sarawak and their successors Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS) are continuously spreading their propaganda saying that “DAP is a Malayan party”, “DAP cannot protect the rights of Sarawakians”, “Only a local party can protect Sarawak” etc. However, one thing is for sure, BN/GPS can’t undo history.

They might be able to spread their propaganda to the public by distorting historical facts but will never dare to show to the public what has been transpired in Parliament Hansards.

History has proven itself that it was the local political parties who eroded Sarawak’s rights and it was the so-called “Malayan party” like DAP who defended the rightful status of Sarawak.

The local political parties are hopeless now as they were hopeless then to defend Sarawak’s rights.

*Aziz Isa is a special assistant to Sarawak DAP chief, Chong Chieng Jen, the DAP Batu Kitang chairman and Dapsy Stampin Chief*

神秘文件MA 63

对 视频《神秘文件 马来西亚协议》做一点 补充

（2022年11月17日）

 这里对视频《神秘文件马来西亚协议》做一点补充： 

1）马来西亚协议本质上就是一份无效非法文件。

1963年7月9日在伦敦签署MA63 之前，英国在砂拉越殖民政府律政司，就写信劝戒英国殖民部不要安排此签署。

此位正义的律政司指出：因为北婆罗洲、砂拉越还是殖民地，还未独立，还未有主权地位，未有主权地位的邦国是不得和已经有独立主权的国家一起签契约的。

他接着警告说：如果勉强这么做，将来如果有人告上国际法庭，将导致此契约失效和非法。 

2）依据（联合国《日内瓦公约》里有关国际契约里的契约签署者之法定地位条规 ）说明：签署国必须具有独立主权的法定地位，而当时的北婆罗洲和砂拉越还是英国殖民地，不具备法定地位。所以， 马来西亚契约是一份无效和非法的侵吞沙巴和砂拉越的文件。   

3）1963年7月22日宁甘就职砂拉越第一任首席部长后，马上依据MA63 附件《参组马来西亚18点备忘录》启动公务员婆罗洲化工作。

但却在1963年9月16日宣布由星加坡、沙巴、砂拉越、马来亚联合邦，四方共组成立马来西亚联邦后，马上受到马来亚方面的强行干涉、阻止、打压、警告。

宁甘不屈服，但，吉隆坡还是无视《砂拉越参组马来西亚十八点备忘录》里关于英国殖民官员离开后，必须进行公务员婆罗洲化的权力，马来亚当局还是执意进行它们对婆罗洲地区的马来亚化既定目标，强行派遣马来亚人来砂拉越。   

4）在视频《神秘文件马来西亚协议》的解说中，提到的新加坡离开马来西亚时，宁甘向英国和马来亚当局指出，新加坡可以并已经离开，我们砂拉越也当然可以要求离开。宁甘还指出：依据契约合法性条规，契约签署相关各方的任何一方离开了，必须马上召开相关各方的正式会议，重新谈判契约条件内容。

吉隆坡方面马上宣布《砂拉越紧急法令》，随后策动其代理人和傀儡强行把宁甘轰下台。 

5）随后，还有更多的无视和破坏《马来西亚协议》与附件《砂拉越参组马来西亚十八点备忘录》的事件，在视频《神秘文件马来西亚协议》中，已详细说明了。   

谢谢相关作者的认真收集资料和制作了这段被盖在地毯下，被遗忘的历史。

UMNO Civil War - Mahathir Helping Sabri To Give Enough Rope For Zahid To Hang Himself

FINANCE TWITTER 

August 26th, 2022

UMNO warlords aligned to the Court Cluster, a term refers to several UMNO leaders facing graft charges in court, including former Prime Minister Najib Razak and UMNO president Zahid Hamidi, were incredibly shocked at the boldness and swiftness of the Federal Court led by Chief Justice Tengku Maimun in sending Najib to prison. The precision strike has even shocked Najib himself.

 

Rosmah Mansor, 70-year-old wife of Najib, is expected to be convicted too when the High Court delivers its decision on the coming September 1. While her case did not have evidence as overwhelming as her 69-year-old husband, there are enough evidence to convict her in the corruption trial to the RM1.25 billion Sarawak rural school's solar energy project.

 

Money changed hands and she had accepted bribes. If her husband’s SRC International corruption was a simple and straightforward case, as ruled by the chief justice, Rosmah’s case is even simpler. The stunning decisiveness displayed by Tengku Maimun has indeed inspired and encouraged other judges. Her leadership sends shivers down the spine of other UMNO crooks.

This is why UMNO Supreme Council member and former Tabung Haji chairman Abdul Azeez Abdul Rahim pretended to be sick today when the Court of Appeal is about to decide whether to strike out his corruption and money laundering charges. Judge Kamaludin Md Said, frustrated with multiple delays, has warned that a decision will be made on Sept 5 whether Azeez is ready or not.

 

And this is also why pro-Najib bloggers, propagandists and cyber troopers are working overtime and burning the midnight oil to cook up yet another dubious 71-page judgement documents pronouncing Rosmah guilty on Sept 1. They knew Rosmah is guilty as hell, but use psychology warfare to create a false perception that like Najib, Rosmah will face an unfair judiciary system.

 

But the most terrified crook after the jailing of Najib is obviously Zahid. If a former prime minister can be imprisoned, who is Zahid to escape punishment? Facing 47 charges related to corruption, money laundering and criminal breach of trust (CBT), his crime is even simpler than Najib and Rosmah combined. Not only money changed hands, the crook used the ill-gotten money to pay his credit cards.

Jumping like a cat on hot bricks, Zahid has been summoning UMNO leaders for endless meetings to gather support to pressure junior colleague – party vice-president Ismail Sabri – to dissolve the parliament for a snap election. At the peak of Najib’s final appeal at the Federal Court, both Najib and Zahid reportedly forced their way into PM Sabri’s residence, demanding political intervention.

 

The disgraced Najib had even instigated his army of hardcore supporters to intimidate Chief Justice Maimun with a death threat. But when Ismail Sabri refused to interfere and Tengku Maimum resisted the personal attacks, panics engulfed the camp of Court Cluster. Thugs were sent to the Palace, disrespectfully demanding the King to interfere and issue a royal pardon for Najib.

 

Comically, none of the United Malays National Organization (UMNO) top leaders, let alone ministers, were present when some 300 Najib supporters marched to the Istana Negara (Palace) just a day after Najib began a 12-year jail term. Not even UMNO party president Ahmad Zahid Hamidi, formerly Najib’s deputy, took part in the illegal gathering.

But the burning question is why Zahid so panicked when he has not even been convicted? Even after he is found guilty, he still has years to appeal at the Court of Appeal and the Federal Court. The answer – without Najib, he is fast losing support within the party. Even though Zahid minions claimed 158 out of 191 UMNO division chiefs supported him, the actual number is much lower.

Known for inflating the figures to project fake support, other sources said only 73 division chiefs – less than half of the claimed 158 division chiefs – had responded to Zahid’s call for a special meeting on Monday (Aug 22). Even then, some had reluctantly attended because they were being threatened – Zahid will not nominate them as candidates in the coming polls if they refused to participate.

 

Meaning the UMNO president commands as little as one third supports from 191 division chiefs. It’s highly possible because top guns like Hishammuddin Hussein, Khairy Jamaluddin and other UMNO ministers aligned to Sabri’s Minister Cluster appeared to have ignored Zahid’s meeting. Now, UMNO warlords aligned to Zahid have given an ultimatum to PM Sabri.

Despite being the prime minister, Ismail Sabri could be sacked as the party’s vice-president unless the turtle egg man obediently carries out 4 demands – remove Attorney General Idrus Harun, sack Chief Justice Tengku Maimun, get a royal pardon for Najib and immediately calls a nationwide election. This is the first time in the history that a sitting premier is being blackmailed by fellow UMNO leaders.

 

The Court Cluster, led by Zahid, threatens to withdraw support for the prime minister, the same way they toppled former backdoor PM Muhyiddin Yassin last year, even though this time the premier is one of their kind. That speaks volumes about how desperate and anger the crooks are at their own vice-president, so much so they dare to openly ask PM Sabri to interfere in the judicial process.

 

However, all the thuggish protests, threats and blackmails exposes how UMNO previously created Kangaroo Court to carry out their orders to pervert the rule of law – till the party was defeated in the 2018 General Election. That explains why the corrupted UMNO regime always won their cases when it reached the Court of Appeal or the Federal Court against the Opposition.

But the biggest surprise was the resistance demonstrated by Ismail Sabri, refusing to kowtow to his two big bosses, Najib and Zahid. He has maintained that the doctrine of separation of powers must be respected. And he has continuously played dumb, dragging his feet for months, despite repetitive pressure to call for an early election.

 

Was the turtle egg man really that clever? When Muhyiddin was forced to resign, Ismail insisted on meeting Mahathir Mohamad to get his support in August 2021. He visited Mahathir again in January 2022 when the old man was admitted to the National Heart Institute (IJN). Both met again in May this year at the 27th International Conference or Nikkei Conference in Japan.

 

Those were published meets. There could be dozens more un-published private meetings between Mahathir and Ismail. Both have common enemies – Najib and Zahid. Surrounded by mostly clowns and apple polishers, the accidental prime minister does not have any credible advisers. Sabri might be dumb, but he understood that the enemy of my enemy is my friend.

In February this year, Mahathir said – “Najib must be stopped. If he comes back to power, this means that the country will be controlled by a kleptocrat from the ‘court cluster’ and risks being robbed”. While the message was written to Johor voters during the state election, Sabri soon found out why Mr Najib must be stopped – if he does not wish to be dumped like a used condom.

 

Even though UMNO had won a “landslide”, Ismail was humiliated the moment he walked into the UMNO-led Barisan Nasional coalition’s command centre at the Johor UMNO Liaison Hall. He was greeted with a roaring “Bubar Parlimen!” (Dissolve Parliament) – clearly staged to pressure the un-elected premier. But that was not the worst humiliation.

When Zahid rudely pushed Ismail to give way for a convicted criminal – Najib Razak – to emerge in the centre of the stage in celebrating Johor state election victory, PM Sabri knew he would be game over the moment he dissolves the parliament. Even though he is just one of UMNO three vice presidents, below Zahid in the party’s ranking, he should be accorded some respect.

More importantly, despite promise to retain Hasni Mohammad as Johor Chief Minister if UMNO wins the state election, it was not the case. A junior, Onn Hafiz Ghazi, has been appointed the Chief Minister instead. If the top leaders could betray Hasni, they can certainly betray “poster boy” Ismail Sabri. As expected, after jailing Najib, his loyalist Puad Zakarshi called the poster boy to be scrapped.

 

The dumb move by Zahid forced the PM to work with Mahathir behind the scene. Last month, Mahathir pre-emptively warned how a non-unanimous decision by the Federal Court in Najib’s final appeal could lead to a royal pardon. After the court delivered an unanimous decision to uphold Najib’s guilty conviction, now Mahathir said there is a 50-50 chance Najib will be pardoned.

 

If 97-year-old Mahathir’s goal was to provoke Najib and Zahid supporters into believing that Najib has been unfairly sentenced to jail, turning the desperados to openly ask PM Sabri to interfere in the judiciary system, the grand old master tactician has done a great job. If the cunning old man’s objective was to pre-emptively warned of a royal pardon, he has done an excellent job.

Now, Ismail Sabri looks like a champion, refusing to give in to demands to interfere in the legal process. His popularity also skyrockets with many people think he must be a clean leader, or at least relatively clean, for fighting the corrupted UMNO crooks. He has won the perception war in the court of public opinion, while Mahathir got his victory in the court of law with Najib imprisonment.

 

People actually rally behind the turtle egg man after news broke that he could be sacked by his own party for refusing to break the prison in order to rescue a crook. The pressure on the prime minister could boomerang on Zahid. If the UMNO president is not careful, he himself can be sacked with the support of two-thirds of delegates at an EGM (according to Article 9.12 of UMNO Constitution).

 

To kill three birds with one stone, Sabri administration has declassified documents pertaining to investigations into the Littoral Combat Ship (LCS) scandal. The brilliant move has not only project transparency in his government, but diverts all the blame on Najib, Zahid and Hishammuddin – all are ambitious corrupted UMNO leaders hunger for the Iron Throne.

The declassification of the LCS project was also one of the reasons Najib and Zahid wanted to neutralize Ismail soonest possible with demands to dissolve the parliament. Armed with Mahathir’s help and Opposition Pakatan Harapan’s support, the supposedly lame duck Sabri has checkmated rival Najib, and soon Zahid, Rosmah, Azeez and other crooks could be terminated.

 

Eventually, Mahathir may return to UMNO after getting rid of Najib, Zahid and Rosmah. The old man only said he will not work with UMNO, but didn’t say he would not go back to the party which he created back in 1988. He said UMNO will win big, thus he needed UMNO to ensure his son could continue his dynasty. For now, he is giving Zahid enough rope to hang himself.

砂拉越的石油和天然气：永远消失了吗？

砂拉越的石油 和天然气：永遠消失了嗎？

砂拉越人必須意识到，成立马来西亚的主要原因实际上是巫统马来人贪婪地觊觎石油,天然气和丰富资源，其在东姑阿都拉曼的领导下意识到马来亚独立后的经济如果没有新的财富来源，将继续岌岌可危，特别是因为大多数锡矿和橡胶园仍由英国人和華人操控之下。 

历史学家 Greg Poulgrain 从他对以前机密的英国政府文件之研究中注意到，組建马来西亚的主要动力是石油，而不是种族。 这就是为什么马来亞人从来没有真正为执行 1963 年马来西亚协议（MA63）的条款而烦恼，尤其是当他们对砂拉越的石油和天然气（当然沙巴也是）以下流的手段得手之后——任务完成。 

MA63 实际上对砂拉越的石油和天然气资源保持沉默，与森林和其他矿产等所有其他自然资源一样，这些资源理所当然地都屬于砂沙的資產；联邦无权也不可剥夺。

 这一切都始于马来亚和英国之间正在进行的独立谈判。早在 1953 年，英国人就已经开始实施其“宏伟设计”计划，将其在东南亚的所有五个殖民地合并为某种形式的“英属东南亚领土”。马来亚知道这个“宏伟的设计”，但婆罗洲却懵然不知。 根据每日快报 2020 年 2 月 16 日的一篇评论文章，“......至于砂拉越境内的石油，英国人准备将其交给马来亚控制下的新联邦。当时的砂拉越总督安东尼阿贝尔爵士于1956 年 4 月，在与殖民办公室的通讯中观察到，“马来亚和新加坡的政界人士对婆罗洲领土表现出极大的兴趣，”包括其空旷的空间、潜在的财富和石油”。 这甚至在马来亚独立之前。 英国人让砂拉越人和沙巴人愉快地没有意识到马来人和新加坡人的这种相当大的兴趣。 

虽然砂拉越代表团可能不知道马来亚和文莱在 MA63 之前的幕后谈判，但从历史记录中可以清楚地看出，马来亚从一开始就坚持文莱的石油收入将在 10 年之后转交给联邦政府。

 当汶莱（特别是汶莱苏丹）不想放弃他们的石油收入时，谈判失败了，

 而石油收入是文莱财富的主要来源。 

因此，马来亞在与砂拉越和沙巴的谈判中对石油和天然气完全保持沉默，完全打算让砂拉越和沙巴措手不及，他们确实这样做到了; 因为“开发矿产资源、矿山、采矿、矿产和矿物矿石、石油和油田；矿产和矿石的采购、销售、进出口；石油产品;矿山和油田的劳动和安全法规；” 1957 年马来亚联邦宪法附表 9 , 联邦清单第 8 (j) 项已提供。 

不幸的是，砂拉越和沙巴没有对此给予任何重视，甚至没有提出任何质疑，因为整个谈判是由英国和马来亚在舞台上进行的。当然，对于狡猾的英国和马来亞来说，沉默意味着同意。 

由英国和马来亚并与声称砂拉越“代表”簽署MA63，而砂拉越仍然是殖民地; 遵循国际法院对查戈斯案的意见說明就是為什么MA63实际上是无效的。

到 1966 年，马来亞颁布了 1966 年石油开采法，根据第 1 条第 2 款“适用于整个马来西亚，但在适用于沙巴和砂拉越时，它仅对离岸土地有效”。该法令原定于 1969 年 11 月 8 日对砂拉越和沙巴生效。 为什么只有离岸土地？因为到 1955 年，壳牌公司已经开始进行海洋地震勘测，并在 1957 年放弃了 75% 的土地租赁。 Temana 油田的初步钻探也在 1962 年首次开采石油。 早在 1966 年 7 月，马来亚就已经制定了 1966 年大陆架法案，据此他们非法和违宪地接管了理应属于砂拉越的大陆架。这赋予了马来亞“关于探索大陆架和开发其自然资源的所有权利，特此授予马来西亚，并由联邦政府行使”。 要做到这一点，他们首先必须摆脱新加坡，其次是宁甘，到 1965 年，宁甘已经成为取代本应是婆罗洲化的马来亚化政策的批评者。马来亞一开始从来没有真正想要新加坡，他们也不是真的想要砂拉越和沙巴，只想要砂拉越和沙巴的石油和天然气。 1966 年之后，马来亚控制的联邦政府开始收取砂拉越壳牌公司支付的开採稅，顺便说一下，分别为 10% 和后来的 12.5%，是砂拉越后来超過56年从马来西亚国家石油公司所获得的两倍多。

对于马来亚控制的联邦政府来说，这仍然不够，到 1970 年代，他们开始认真考虑遵循 Pertamina（印度尼西亚）的生产共享模式，为此颁布了非法和违宪的 1974 年石油开发法案（PDA74）; 把马来西亚所有石油资源的全部所有权注入国家石油公司。 

所以最终在 1976 年，砂拉越和沙巴因此“失去”了对我们石油和天然气的完全所有权，即使这样做是非法和违宪的。砂拉越和沙巴都没有在法庭上挑战 PDA74。

 通过这种方式，砂拉越收到了 5% 的现金支付，而不是之前的 10-12.5%（依据原油或原料气价格）。剩下的 5% 归联邦政府所有，其作为国油的唯一股东，也以股息和公司税、石油所得税和出口关税的形式获得了额外的回报。马来西亚国家石油公司/联邦政府总共获得了石油净收入的 92%，其中大约 6.5-7% 流向了壳牌公司等石油承包商，剩下的 1-1.5% 流向了砂拉越。 

這一切都永远失去了，还是砂拉越仍有可能从马来亚的控制和统治中夺回自己的石油和天然气资源的所有权？ 这是一个只能由砂拉越人民和政府来回答的问题。 从海盗手中夺回我们的财产并不容易，他们当然会反抗到底。 砂拉越政府在成立 Petros 和对石油产品征收 SST 方面取得了良好的开端。根据砂拉越总理的说法，仅石油产品的收入迄今已达到 85.2 亿令吉，这是一个相当大的数字，相較於联邦预算对砂拉越撥款仍然没有根据其通过的石油和天然气收入之貢献。 

联邦政府似乎认为国油是金鹅，而实际上它是砂拉越和沙巴的。然而，他们在偷所有鸡蛋的同时没有正确喂养金鹅。 

砂拉越政府和 Petros 采取了正确的步骤，重新控制砂拉越的陆上石油资产。接下来一定是全面控制砂拉越的离岸石油资产，而石油和天然气仍然保持切題的，同时我们开发新的可再生能源

我们仍然在这里谈论砂拉越的潜在收入，不是数百亿令吉，而是数千亿令吉，可以提高所有砂拉越人的生活水平，特别是那些迄今为止被边缘化和没有适当发展机会的人和社会经济发展机会。 

在 1976 年至 2017 年期间，原油和原料气产量超过 6600 亿令吉，其中砂拉越的开採稅收入仅为 330 亿令吉，平均每年为 8.05 亿令吉。 

到目前为止，單單砂拉越这个数字应该已经超过 1 兆令吉，再加上加工增加值约 2 兆吉。这就是砂拉越在过去 46 年中所失去的。 

正如潘多拉文件所揭示的；马来亞人成功地將1.9兆令吉主要来自砂拉越的石油和天然气收入转移到离岸银行账户中。这是他们不允许在议会辩论的另一个課题。 

砂拉越为了通过增值加工, 尽可能多地收回石油和天然气收入，现在已经开展了各种举措，包括建立各种石化和其他炼油厂，以便能够加工和利用我们自己的石油和天然气资源增值而不是像马来西亚国家石油公司现在所做的那样以快速现金廉价出售。 

我们需要加强我们国内的天然气分配设施，以便砂拉越人也可以享受我们现在供应到海外和在补貼马来亚更便宜的能源。马来亚拥有超过 2,000 公里的天然气管道，而砂拉越则不到 50 公里。仅对马来亚发电厂、工业和消费者的天然气补贴就已超过 2000 亿令吉，而砂拉越则为零。 

为了充分利用我们自己的石油和天然气资源，我们需要从马来西亚国家石油公司和马来亚重新获得对它们的完全控制和所有权。要做到这一点，我们需要加强我们的监管能力和对马来亚采取强硬态度的政治意愿，利用我们自己的石油和天然气資源而不是持續地被牵着鼻子走。

正如我们所看到的，如果我们开发了自己的石油和天然气资源，这將是一次非常昂贵的旅程，在此期间至少花费了我们数兆令吉。我们再也不能被马来亚人欺騙了。他们一直在为自己着想，认为我们是理所当然的，甚至称我们是他们的定期存款。 

不再遲疑, 现在是砂拉越人思考我们自己和自己人民的时候了。 否则，我们的石油和天然气将真正永远消失。

Yusuf Abdul Rahman

Kuching 23rd July 2022

SARAWAK’S OIL & GAS – LOST FOREVER? 

By Yusuf Abdul Rahman  

It is important for Sarawakians to realise that the main reason behind the proposal for the formation of Malaysia was in fact the Oil & Gas resources and wealth that was greedily coveted by the UMNo Malayans, who under Tunku Abdul Rahman had realised that Malaya’s economy after Independence would remain precarious without a new source of wealth, especially since most of the tin mines and rubber estates were still under British and Chinese control. 

Greg Poulgrain, a historian has noted from his study of previously classified British government documents that the primary impetus for forming Malaysia was oil, not ethnicity. 

This is why the Malayans were never really bothered about implementing the terms of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) as fully as they should have, especially once they had gotten their dirty hands on Sarawak’s Oil & Gas (Sabah’s as well, of course) – mission accomplished. 

MA63 was in fact silent about Sarawak’s Oil & Gas resources, which rightfully are inalienable assets of the State and not the federation, like all other natural resources such as forests and other minerals. 

It all started while the negotiations for independence were proceeding between Malaya and the British. The British since as early as 1953 had also started plans in motion for its “grand design” to merge all of their five colonial possessions in South East Asia into some form of “British SouthEast Asia Dominion”. Malaya was aware of this “grand design”, but the Borneo territories were not. 

According to an opinion article in the Daily Express dated 16th February 2020, "...As for the oil in Sarawak territory, the British were prepared to surrender that to the new federation under control of Malaya. Sir Anthony Abell, then Governor of Sarawak, in April 1956 observed in a communication to the Colonial Office that “the politicians in both Malaya and Singapore were showing considerable interest in the Borneo territories “including its empty spaces, its potential wealth, and its oil”.

This was even before Malayan independence. 

The British kept Sarawakians & Sabahans blissfully unaware of this considerable interest by the Malayans and the Singaporeans.   

While the Sarawak delegations may not have been aware of the negotiations going on behind the scenes between Malaya and Brunei prior to MA63, it is clear from historical records that the Malayans insisted from the start that Brunei’s oil revenues would pass to the federal government after 10 years. 

Negotiations failed when the Bruneians (the Sultan of Brunei in particular) did not want to give away their oil revenues, the main source of Brunei’s wealth.  

The Malayans therefore kept completely silent about Oil & Gas in their negotiations with Sarawak & Sabah, fully intending to take Sarawak & Sabah by surprise, which they did, since the “Development of mineral resources, mines, mining, minerals and mineral ores, oils and oilfields; purchase, sale, import and export of minerals and mineral ores; petroleum products; regulation of labour and safety in mines and oilfields;” were already provided in the Item 8 (j) of the Federal List, 9th Schedule of the Constitution of the Federation Malaya 1957. 

Sarawak & Sabah unfortunately did not give any importance to this nor even raise any query, since the entire negotiations were stage-managed by the British and the Malayans. To the deceptive British & Malayans, of course, silence meant consent. 

This is partly why MA63 is actually null and void, being signed by Britain & Malaya & purported Sarawak “representatives” while Sarawak was still a colony, following the Chagos case opinion by the ICJ. 

By 1966, the Malayans had enacted the Petroleum Mining Act 1966, which under section 1 (2) “shall apply throughout Malaysia but in its application to Sabah and Sarawak it shall have effect only with respect to off- shore land”. This Act was supposed to come into operation on 8th November 1969 with regard to Sarawak and Sabah. 

Why only off-shore land? Because by 1955 Shell had already started marine seismic surveys and in 1957 had relinquished 75% of its land lease. Initial drilling in the Temana field had also hit first oil in 1962. 

Earlier in July 1966, the Malayans had already enacted the Continental Shelf Act 1966, whereby they illegally and unconstitutionally took over the Continental Shelf that rightfully belonged to Sarawak. This gave the Malayans “all rights with respect to the exploration of the continental shelf and the exploitation of its natural resources are hereby vested in Malaysia and shall be exercisable by the Federal Government”. 

To do this, they first had to get rid of Singapore and secondly, Ningkan, who by 1965 was becoming a critic of the Malayanisation policy that had supplanted what was supposed to be Borneonisation. The Malayans never really wanted Singapore in the first place, nor did they really want Sarawak & Sabah either, only Sarawak & Sabah’s Oil & Gas. 

After 1966, the Malayan

-controlled federal government started collecting the royalties that were paid by Shell Sarawak, which incidentally, at 10% and later 12.5%, were more than double what Sarawak was to get later from Petronas for more than 56 years. 

This was still not enough for the Malayan-

controlled federal government and by the 1970s they started to seriously think about following the Pertamina (Indonesia) production-sharing model, to do which the illegal and unconstitutional Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA74) was enacted that vested the entire ownership of all petroleum resources within Malaysia with Petronas. 

So finally in 1976, Sarawak and Sabah thus “lost” complete ownership of our Oil & Gas, even if it was done illegally and unconstitutionally. Neither Sarawak nor Sabah have ever challenged PDA74 in court.  

In this way, instead of 10-12.5% as previously, Sarawak received a cash payment of 5% (based on crude oil or raw gas prices). The other 5% went to the federal government, who as the sole shareholder of Petronas, also got additional returns in the form of dividends and corporate tax, petroleum income tax and export duties. Altogether Petronas/the federal government received 92% of total net petroleum revenues, with approximately 6.5-7% going to the petroleum contractors such as Shell, leaving 1-1.5% to Sarawak. 

Has all been lost forever, or is it still possible for Sarawak to claw back the ownership of its own Oil & Gas resources from Malayan control and domination? 

That is a question that can only be answered by the people and the government of Sarawak. 

Clawing back our property from the hands of thieves is not easy and they will of course resist to the bitter end. 

The Sarawak government has made a good start with the formation of Petros and the imposition of SST on petroleum products. Revenue derived from petroleum products alone according to Sarawak Premier has reached RM8.52 billion to date, a significant amount, in view of the fact that the Federal budget still doesn’t give Sarawak a commensurate share based on Sarawak’s contribution to the national economy via our Oil & Gas revenues. 

The Federal government seems to think Petronas is the golden goose, when it is in fact Sarawak (and also Sabah). Yet they don’t feed the golden goose properly while stealing all the eggs. 

The Sarawak govt and Petros have taken the correct step of regaining control of Sarawak’s onshore petroleum assets. Next must be regaining full  

control of Sarawak’s offshore petroleum assets, while Oil & Gas still remain relevant and while we develop new sources of renewable energy. 

We are still talking here of potential revenues to Sarawak amounting not to tens of billions of ringgit but hundreds of billions of ringgit that can raise the living standards of all Sarawakians, especially those that have so far been marginalised and have not had proper access to development and socio-economic opportunities for advancement. 

Between 1976 and 2017, the value of crude Oil and raw Gas production exceeded 660 billion ringgit, out of which Sarawak only saw 33 billion ringgit in royalty, amounting to an average of 805 million ringgit per year. 

By now, the figure should have reached more than 1 trillion ringgit, with value added from processing of about 2 trillion ringgit, just from Sarawak alone. This is what Sarawak has lost over the last 46 years.  

It is largely from Sarawak’s Oil & Gas revenues that the Malayans have managed to siphon off 1.9 trillion ringgit into offshore bank accounts, as revealed by the Pandora Papers. This is another subject that they will not allow to be debated in Parliament. 

In trying to claw back as much Oil & Gas revenue as possible, through value added processing, Sarawak has now embarked on various initiatives involving setting up of various petrochemical and other refining plants to be able to process and utilise our own Oil & Gas resources for value added instead of being sold cheaply for fast cash, as is now being done by Petronas.  

We need to enhance our domestic gas distribution facilities so that Sarawakians can also enjoy cheaper energy that we now supply overseas and subsidise in Malaya. Malaya has more than 2,000 km of natural gas pipelines and Sarawak less than 50 km. Gas subsidy to Malayan power plants, industries and consumers alone has already amounted to more than 200 billion ringgit, while Sarawak gets zero. 

In order to get the full benefit of our own Oil & Gas resources, we need to regain full control and ownership of them from Petronas and Malaya. To do this we need to strengthen our regulatory capabilities and we need the political will to be tough with the Malayans, instead of constantly being pushed around and taken for a ride on our own Oil & Gas resources. 

As we can see, this has been a very expensive ride that has cost us at least a couple of trillion ringgit all this while, if we had developed our own Oil & Gas resources. We just cannot afford to be taken for a ride by the Malayans anymore. They have been thinking of themselves all this while, and taken us for granted, even calling us their fixed deposit.  

No more. It is now more than high time for Sarawakians to think about ourselves and our own people. 

Or else, our Oil & Gas will truly be lost forever. 

Yusuf Abdul Rahman Kuching 23rd July 2022

**（肯雅兰全民党主席 温利山 2022年7月13日）**

英国是否授予砂拉越自治或独立？*

Selkirk勋爵说，英国殖民地只能通过英国议会頒發的独立法案而获得独立。在英国议会通过 1957 年马来亚独立法案后，马来亚于 1957 年获得独立。

当李光耀在 1963 年 8 月 31 日宣布新加坡独立时，Selkirk 勋爵澄清此事是错误的，因为英国没有通过新加坡独立法案授予其独立。

我们不能说英国授予砂拉越自治是因为英国或殖民地总督沒有签发任何加持法律文书。这是一个重要的法律事务和政治事件，而没有将任何文书交给宁甘自治的事实表明；1963 年 7 月 22 日，砂拉越没有获得自治政权。

最高委员会的所有成员都是由殖民地总督任命的，他还主持了第一次最高委员会会议並在会议期间表达其对离开后所接任之总督者而担忧。

然而，*英国总督保留全权*直到 9 月 16 日（1963 年）。 從8月31日至9月16日（1963年），他（英国总督）表示将遵守砂拉越州内阁的决定。这是一个双刃剑声明並清楚地表明英国人在于控制內閣尤其是当中有外籍人士坐鎮。

參见婆罗洲邮报發佈于2015年11月9日, 星期一, 清晨3点16分；敎授Leigh称1963 年 7 月 22 日砂拉越沒有获得独立。

说有一个自治政府只是为了不让砂拉越人失望。

Abang Johari Tun Openg 明了真相之后其将 722 年重新定为砂拉越日，並取消了 TS Adenan Satem 公布的砂拉越独立日。 TS Adenan Satem 之措施是政治性的。这是为了获得选票以帮助其继续掌权。

当时最高委员会是砂拉越内阁並有外籍人士坐鎮。总督仅在 1963 年 9 月 16 日下午启航离開ASTANA; 这是Abang Johari Tun Openg本人在最近的新闻声明中证实了这一点。

很明显，英国人的意图是让砂拉越接受马来西亚並要它在马来西亚联邦内是独立的，但实际上是作为殖民地交给马来亚或由马来亚控制。

722 不是独立日庆祝的日子，虽然我们已经不在被英国统治，而是由马来亚统治；马来亚是沙巴和砂拉越的另一个殖民统治者。

CMS DISMISSED STAFF EXPOSE CMS CORRUPTION & MALAYAN COLONIAL LOCUST GLC ASSET STRIPPING

A letter to the Yang Amat Berbahagia Premier of Sarawak and All Sarawakian Ministers, please save Sarawakian or anak Sarawak from the “slaughter” of all the West Malaysian in CMS.  

For your info, Sulaiman Taib, the woman-beater, has brought in bunch of West Malaysian from Scomi Group and they started to “slaughter” innocent Sarawakian of all races in CMS. 

I have been working with CMS for 23 years and my service was terminated within 24 hours and was escorted out of my office today. I think the reason was because I refused to “assist” in siphoning money out from CMS for this West Malaysian Chief led by Sulaiman Taib, the woman-beater. 

Dear Yang Amat Berbahagia Premier, you are the only hope for all Sarawakian in CMS who have children to feed and to send the Kids to school. This West Malaysian is scapegoating Sarawakian in CMS and to terminate our service without valid reason. We all know how Taib created CMS out of Sarawak State’s coffer during his tenure as the CM of Sarawak for 23 years. 

We all know how CMS was created out of State’s vehicle namely SEDC, we all know how CMS “stole” State’s Land during the barrage’s projects by doing payment in kind with State’s land and later transferred those land to CMS via CMS Land. 

We all know how CMS made use of PPESW, as a GLC, to acquire State’s mega projects during Taib’s tenure as the CM for 23 years. Now that PPESW is 51% owned by SEDC which is a GLC company then why PPESW is still subject the control of Sulaiman Taib and his West Malaysia geng. 

They are not helping in solving problem but to dig deeper holes again and see how the State Government would react when all the money was siphoned out CMS and to Sualiman, the woman-beater, and his West Malaysian geng. 

Abang Johari, please put a stop to the on-going “slaughter” in CMS ASAP. If not this unfair mass termination in CMS would surely affect the popularity of the GPS’s Government. Tq.