MA63 is a fraud22/3/22

They should not insist on amending the federal constitution by reinstating the lost status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners of Malaya in the federation.

“The Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) is a fraud in itself because it says nothing about Sabah and Sarawak being equal to the Federation of Malaya”, he said in a written statement.

Another fraud in the so-called agreement was that at the point that it was signed on July 9, 1963 Sarawak was not a sovereign nation.

In fact, the signing of MA63 violated established international law because Sabah and Sarawak at that time were still colonies of Britain.

“Under international law, only sovereign nations have the legal standing to sign treaties with one another. Thus, the signing of MA63 was also in contravention of Article 7 of the United Nations Decolonisation Declaration of 1960 (UNDD),” he said.

Legal experts also believe that MA63 should be treated as an invalid treaty after Singapore exited from Malaysia.

“The MPs and state governments of Sabah and Sarawak would betray the trust of their people if they insist on or participate in the amendment to the federal constitution,” he said.

“The remedy that Sabah and Sarawak should immediately take now, instead of seeking to amend the federal constitution, is to inform or make representation to the United Nations giving their views that the formation of Malaysia should be considered null and void.

“At the same time, Sabah and Sarawak should under the supervision of the United Nations take steps to proceed with decolonisation process under Article 1514 of the United Nations Resolutions before deciding the fate of Sabah and Sarawak further.”

For decolonisation process many legal minds believe that Britain still has a political obligation to see the decolonisation of Sabah and Sarawak be properly done in accordance with international law. With United Nations Resolutions 1514 and 1541, Sabah and Sarawak were said to be gifts from Britain to the Federation of Malaya on September 16, 1963, to enlarge the territories of the federation.

On that day, Datuk Ong Yoke Lin, the Permanent Secretary to the United Nations from the Federation of Malaya notified that upon the acquisition of Singapore, Sabah and Sarawak, the Federation of Malaya took a new name called the Federation of Malaysia.

Therefore, to many legal experts, Malaysia is Malaya and Malaya is Malaysia, he said.

砂拉越政府的责任23/3/22

砂拉越政府到底责任在哪儿？怎么允许砂拉越短缺5037位教师呢？该是时候要回砂拉越的教育自主权了吧！砂盟政府该发挥邦国的权益吧！砂总理的权力到底有多少份量呢？他怎么能坐视不理砂拉越短缺这么多教师。很多砂拉越人想当教师连门都没有。怎么一回事？

今天，如果砂拉越掌握教育自主权，这种情形绝对不会发生，而且可以制造很多就业机会呢。这一切，能怪谁呢？我们的人民代表们到底在做什么？

Shortage of teachers in Sarawak23/3/22

Shortage of 5037 teachers in Sarawak

On behalf of Sarawakians, I would like to complain about the shortage of 5037 teachers in Sarawak. I am sad to see the happening when many Sarawakians who want to be teachers are deprived of the chance. Isn't it time for GPS government to ask for the return of the education autonomy for good?

The GPS government definitely has the responsibility to address the shortage by training our own teachers. Isn't time to keep the taxes collected from different sources from Sarawak for our own use?

Thank you for your understanding and attention.

Yours faithfully，

Belinda Ling Moi Hung.

The Labuan people decide

Labuan people have right to decide – Hajiji

POSTED ON MARCH 24, 2022, THURSDAY AT 8:52 

KOTA KINABALU (March 24): The people of Labuan have the right to decide whether they want to be part of Sabah again or stay as a Federal Territory.

Chief Minister Datuk Seri Panglima Hajiji Haji Noor said this in reply to elected assemblyman Datuk Seri Panglima Yong Teck Lee who asked the Sabah government to ask the Federal government to return Labuan to Sabah.

“This matter involves the people of that island because they have the right to decide the position of the territory,” he said in the Finance Ministry’s winding-up speech at the State Assembly 

Moi Hung Ling:

What kind of logic is it for the need of Labuan people' right to decide whether to have Labuan returned or "stay as the federal territory when the Malayan government took away Labuan without any consent and approval of the Labuan people?

婆罗洲的事29/3/22

看新闻说说看   29/3/22

魏家祥：无此建议   不建设婆罗洲铁路网  (诗华日报)

婆罗洲建不建铁路网应该是砂总理说了算，绝对不是魏博士认为该不该建的事。砂拉越沙巴有的是天然资源，要建几条铁路连贯砂沙两国是咱们婆罗洲的事。

 

说好了恢复马来西亚三国联邦平等伙伴地位，是时候归还所有属于砂沙两邦国的权益。归还咱们石油天然气拥有权，让咱们砂沙两邦国建立咱们的基本措施权益。营业效应不必魏博士操心。 

 

一个好政府是先建设好基本措施来方便人民。有好基本措施就容易带旺一个国家的经济发展和制造就业机会。这样就可以吸引人才回流和留住人才。

看新闻说说看 1/4/22

有330砂拉越临教被拒面试，我是感到非常生气。我觉得砂拉越政府应该坚决要回教育自主权让咱们自己决定标准聘请老师，没事的。真的不用马来西亚/马来亚联邦操心。

益华重建缺120万，工程完成了60%，有关单位呼吁华社捐款。我认为很不对，教育大事本来就是政府的事，绝对不可推搪给公众。 任何华小建设总是依赖华社捐款应该切除这过去的老习惯。是时候向华人代表发威要求他们好好去办事。不是说朝里有人好办事吗？请证明给大家看吧！

砂医疗设备匮乏，有七成归类BER等级，就是正如报纸报道76%的医疗资产设备被归类为“超出维修经济效益（BER)" 还有医保系统也面对人力短缺大问题。我不知道砂邦国政府怎么面对砂民。这是超严重的缺失。砂拉越政府怎能能受这样的羞辱啊！

砂拉越缺5037教师，但是很多砂拉越人想当教师却求教师职位无门。这种情形就好像向砂总理和砂拉越政府脸上刮了几巴掌。拿回砂拉越自主权才是解决问题的唯一方法。

AbangJohari说根据MA63行使权力。他真的有能力要求马来西亚联邦政府要回咱们砂拉越固有的权益吗？ 何必忙着去他处”找钱”。 要求回30%石油和天然气的30%的开采税，要回100%咱们砂邦所有的税收，咱们绝对有办法应付砂邦所有的开销，你们说，是吗？

心想事成2/4/22

心想事成  2/4/22

你心怎么想，加上适当的行动，事就这么成了.  如果你有机会建筑自己理想的住家，这是你想要的款式和大小，就这样事成了。你已经找到了一块地，也有足够的资源进行这个工程， 这是心想事成的事。世界上，那一样建设不是心想+行动，然后实现。

 

不同建筑款式和大小就是符合某人的想法而建成的。我看到我小妹的独立屋建在自己的土地的款式跟一般非常不一样，很特别。我老爸的独立屋子也是他心想的那一套。我大哥请人建的那间房屋也是他个别的心想而事成的屋子，那是按照他个别唯一的特别的款式建的。我三妹的大女儿刚建好的那一间也是她和我二妹先生，她的二姨丈一起构想的建设。我大哥和我三妹的大女儿的屋子都是在澳洲。这些列子不是【心想事成】吗？

 

在回头看看我们四周的建筑物，那一样，不是有人这么想，所以才有这么呈现呢？ 每次我用保由路时，我都会去看一看，有一间非常特别的屋子。这肯定是按照这家主人的理想款式和大小建设的。

 

咱们砂拉越是有权力独立国家。现在在马来亚/马来西亚联邦内是4不像。州不像州，邦国不像邦国，国不像国，更像殖民地。这怎么一回事？这一切归根究底就是砂民被宗主国马来亚（更名为马来西亚）严重洗脑。更可恨的是咱们砂官爷们跟马来亚官爷们狼狈为奸，吃里扒外和里应外合一起掠夺，剥削，打压，抢劫和霸凌砂民。

 

砂拉越独立是迟早的事。不过现阶段，砂民普遍是没有这种概念和想法。所以要迈进砂拉越独立方向，真的，真的要从砂民【心想】建设做起。不然一切都免谈。现阶段，砂盟政府以【利益贿赂】土著选民。要打破这枷锁，必须长期经营，还有借用他们出外谋生的子孙回来引导教育他们长辈们的选择。

 

一切都是从【信念/相信/心想】开始。2026年是否可以改朝换代，全看砂民是否清醒了。这一切得看每个砂拉越独立使者努力推动【心想独立】运动。每个领袖一定要学如何团结和连接他人建造一个个，个别和共同的，强大的，人民组织网向砂拉越独立迈进。

 

有【心想砂拉越独立】的砂民独立使者就得开始属于自己组织个别的人脉然后连接共同的人民组织网一起去完成砂拉越独立程序。  BL