Labahua

Wednesday, 19 September 2018

Sarawak will not be invaded if it secedes from Malaysia, says ex-Rep

KUCHING, Sept 9: Former Batu Lintang assemblyman Voon Lee Shan believes there
would not be any security threats if Sarawak were to be independent from Malaysia
After much debate on Sarawak security issues if it were to secede from Malaysia.

Voon reckoned foreign powers would not pose a threat to Sarawak-which has no military power of its own because superpowers in this region, such as China, would not gain anything from it.

In fact, he said, China, being a permanent member of the United Nations (UN)together with the United States(US), would be obliged to maintain peace and order when there is a threat, breach and act of
aggression in any part of the world, including Sarawak.

"Someone posed me an issue and said independence is not good because we don't have any army and proper defence from security threats from outside. My answer to
this problem is that when Singapore exited Malaysia in 1965, it was at the height of
communist insurgency in South East Asia and Singapore had no defence system, but it survived. No one attacked Singapore, not even the communists," argued Voon.

He said Singapore lies on a lucrative shipping route where ships from the East to Indian Ocean and Africa passed through, and with such a strategic position, still no foreign power had occupied or invaded Singapore.

He also cited Brunei, a small country like Singapore, which had no submarines and
their defence was known to be weak, yet no foreign power had attacked Brunei until now.

"Malaysia's defence is also porous with a submarine that could not submerge and with only four working fighter jets, no foreign power is thinking of attacking Malaysia.

"China is the most powerful country in this region, but it never wished to go to war. In fact, it never did," Voon pointed out.

As for Japan, he said by its constitution, it was not allowed to mobilise its army for any military aggression, except for defence only.

Whereas if(North)Korea were to attack Sarawak, Voon added, this would give an excuse for the US to destroy its leader, Kim Jong Un.

"Indonesia will not likely do it too because the Dayaks in Kalimatan Will not be happy on the reason that the Dayaks here (in Sarawak ) have close rapport with them, " he said.

Voon added that when Israel was attacked by the Arabs when their land was returned to their people, the US and other nations came to their rescue. And when Kuwait was attacked by Iraq, UN took immediate action and launched 'Operation Desert Storm' to liberate Kuwait.

"Therefore, the world wants peace, and the UN will monitor all unrest caused by external aggression, except civil conflicts within the nation.

"Most important is that the Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63) is registered with the UN, and it has a political obligation to see conflicts should be resolved in the interest of the security of the region.

"The British still has a political responsibility to see security in our region is secured because we were once its colony and Britain should know their political responsibilities of making an invalid MA63," Voon assured.
-Dayakdaily
</title>
<des>https://dayakdaily.com/sarawak-will-not-be-invaded-if-it-secedes-from-malaysia-says-ex-rep/

Sarawak will not be invaded if it secedes from Malaysia, says ex-Rep

KUCHING, Sept 9: Former Batu Lintang assemblyman Voon Lee Shan believes there
would not be any security threats if Sarawak were to be independent from Malaysia
After much debate on Sarawak security issues if it were to secede from Malaysia.

Voon reckoned foreign powers would not pose a threat to Sarawak-which has no military power of its own because
superpowers in this region, such as China, would not gain anything from it.

In fact, he said, China, being a permanent member of the United Nations (UN)together
with the United States(US), would be obliged to maintain peace and order when there is a threat, breach and act of
aggression in any part of the world, including Sarawak.

"Someone posed me an issue and said independence is not good because we don't have any army and proper defence from security threats from outside. My answer to
this problem is that when Singapore exited Malaysia in 1965, it was at the height of
communist insurgency in South East Asia and Singapore had no defence system, but it
survived. No one attacked Singapore, not even the communists," argued Voon.
.
He said Singapore lies on a lucrative shipping route where ships from the East to Indian Ocean and Africa passed through, and with such a strategic position, still no foreign power had occupied or invaded Singapore.

He also cited Brunei, a small country like Singapore, which had no submarines and
their defence was known to be weak, yet no foreign power had attacked Brunei until now.

"Malaysia's defence is also porous with a submarine that could not submerge and with only four working fighter jets, no foreign power is thinking of attacking Malaysia.

"China is the most powerful country in this region, but it never wished to go to war. In
fact, it never did," Voon pointed out.

As for Japan, he said by its constitution, it was not allowed to mobilise its army for any
military aggression, except for defence only.

Whereas if(North)Korea were to attack Sarawak, Voon added, this would give an excuse for the US to destroy its leader, Kim Jong Un.

"Indonesia will not likely do it too because the Dayaks in Kalimatan Will not be happy
on the reason that the Dayaks here (in
Sarawak ) have close rapport with them, " he said.

Voon added that when Israel was attacked by the Arabs when their land was returned
to their people, the US and other nations came to their rescue. And when Kuwait was
attacked by Iraq, UN took immediate action and launched 'Operation Desert Storm' to liberate Kuwait.

"Therefore, the world wants peace, and the UN will monitor all unrest caused by externa
aggression, except civil conflicts within the nation.

"Most important is that the Malaysia
Agreement 1963(MA63) is registered with the UN, and it has a political obligation to
see conflicts should be resolved in the interest of the security of the region.

"The British still has a political responsibility to see security in our region is secured because we were once its colony and Britain should know their political responsibilities

多多陈[Sticker]TanToTo 6:24 PM🦋（古晋17日讯）砂副首长丹斯里詹姆士玛欣称，首相敦马哈迪指探讨1963年大马建国契约，只是为了拖延整个程序的诱饵，沙巴及砂拉越不应继续被愚弄。他今日针对马哈迪指希望联盟将探讨1963年大马建国契约，恢复沙巴及砂拉越为共组马来西亚平等伙伴地位的言论发表文告时，如是说。詹姆士玛欣质问马哈迪，究竟还要探讨什么？1963年大马建国契约是一份共组马来西亚所联合签署的国际契约，应该由签署3方，即马来亚、砂拉越及沙巴去审核，是否有任何违反1963年大马契约的行为。“倘若有任何违反行为，那么，签署契约的3方将决定此举是否严重到足以导致契约失去法律效益。”惟，他表示，马哈迪所建议的“探讨”，只是为了拖延整个程序的诱饵，沙巴及砂拉越在过去55年来被蒙蔽了双眼。“已经够了，沙巴及砂拉越不应再被愚弄。”🦋

Mycomments：
这老千马老是讥笑纳吉政府是盗贼政府，那过去22+拜相从中盗取砂沙石油天然气财富，还不比纳吉多吗？当时，他在位时进行各种各样发展从中捞取。这是全世界知道的事。他今天在阴差阳错下再次拜相，是祸是福还未知呢。我相信Allah对邪恶的人一定有安排很难看的下场的。他累积的副能量，有一天都会打回的。这就是宇宙中的定律，不是吗？

張鸿泰 4:02 AM承認違憲作廢就好
中区2018年9月19日
       (本報古晉18日訊)雖然說我國聯邦憲法確實闡明﹐要修改憲法的話﹐就必須先在國會中取得三分之二多數票的支持﹔但鑒于我國國會在1976年進行的相關修憲決定本身就是違憲的﹐所以恢復砂沙之平等夥伴地位一事其實不需要再回到國會中﹑並透過國會的投票機制來進行修正。
砂人聯黨中央青年團總團長程明智是在受訪時﹐如是表示。
        同時身為執業律師的他說﹐我國國會是在1976年透過修改憲法第1(2)條文的方式﹐讓砂拉越與沙巴的地位﹐從建國時候的邦國夥伴地位降為我國13州之一的地位。
他續稱﹐我國聯邦憲法也闡明﹐要修改憲法﹐就必須先在國會中取得三分之二多數票的支持。
     “敦馬哈迪在日前做出要恢復砂沙之平等夥伴地位的宣佈時也提及說﹐我國國會必須先有三分之二的多數票支持﹐才能透過修憲方式來修正砂沙的地位。”
但他個人認為﹐我國國會在1976年進行的相關修憲決定﹐其實是違憲的行為。
     “按照1963年馬來西亞立國契約﹐砂拉越與沙巴乃與馬來亞共組馬來西亞﹐所以砂拉越與沙巴所具備的平等邦國夥伴地位乃是建國的基礎﹐ 並且不應因為在國會中修憲等方式而獲得更改。鑒于國會無權透過修憲方式來更改砂沙的地位﹐所以該在1976年進行的修憲決定﹐本身就是違憲的。”

立國契約清楚闡明
       他不忘強調﹐砂拉越與沙巴的平等邦國夥伴地位已清楚闡明在馬來西亞立國契約當中﹐所以砂沙兩地的有關地位是不容更改的。他還表示﹐恢復砂沙之平等夥伴地位一事其實不需要再回到國會中﹑並透過國會的投票機制來進行修正。
    “在恢復砂沙的地位方面﹐我們不需要尋求投票還是尋求聯邦政府的同意﹐因為那是本來就屬於我們的地位。” 他直言﹐直接承認1976年的修憲決定涉及違法﹐才是能夠即刻恢復砂沙之平等夥伴地位的最直接做法。
       與此同時﹐他說明﹐有人形容說﹐砂沙的代表在1976年支持修改聯邦憲法第1(2)條文﹑以把砂拉越與沙巴列為我國13個州之一的行為﹐就形同是“出賣”了砂沙的權益。
     “唯﹐在該修憲決定違法的前提下﹐又那來有人‘出賣’砂沙權益之說﹖”
事先應獲砂沙通過他不忘指出﹐如果要將砂沙兩地的地位降級的話﹐那有關決定也必須事先獲得砂拉越立法議會或沙巴立法議會的通過。
     “如果砂拉越立法議會或沙巴立法議會不予以通過的話﹐那就算是兩地的國會議員在國會中做出支持﹑還是首長等政府領導與聯邦政府簽署相關合約﹐砂拉越與沙巴的地位都不能因此而受到影響。”
        他舉例說﹐當初將吉隆坡劃分成聯邦直轄區之前﹐雪蘭莪州立法議會也必須先行就有關決定表示同意。
“沙巴在1984年將納閩劃分為聯邦直轄區一事之前﹐也需要事先獲得沙巴立法議會的同意。”
        他表示﹐在過去參組馬來西亞的55年內﹐砂拉越立法議會都不曾通過任何要將砂拉越降格為州屬的決定。

My comments:
马来亚霸权最好最好最好最好。。。。不要在玩违宪的事。不然有一天咱们沙砂人会让你们丑相百出到万出或更多那时真的很不好玩。55年，玩弄够了吧。咱们砂罗越人民不想再这么玩下去了。记得，不要在国际法庭见。对你们霸权国是百/千/万害无一利的。砂罗越不是在1960s年代了。那时，不到10%人民认同下，Sarawak 就被逼参加马来西亚联邦国。今天我们砂罗越人才济济，我们是会有99.9%人认同下脱离这马来亚霸权国。我有联合国去殖民化条文脱离。砂罗越是属于砂罗越人的。

By Kenny Boon 发布于 September 19, 2018

（本报古晋19日讯）巫统纳兹里要砂沙放弃移民自主权的言论才真正显示同等伙伴国地位言论已经严重藐视砂沙 2 邦国存在，马来亚议员想尽办法再次消灭砂拉越仅仅留住的移民自主权。

S4S中央发言人陈各昌今日召开新闻发布会时指出，马来亚与沙巴有无数的外劳“合法”取得身分证，这让砂拉越感到非常担忧，如果砂拉越也失去移民自主权，相信不久的将来也将面对大量外劳涌入并“合法”领取身分证，砂拉越人的安危将受到威胁。

移民自主权关系到 1963年签署的马来西亚国际公约，纳兹里应该去问敦拉曼为什么当时同意砂拉越和沙巴拥有移民自主权，而不是 55 年后要砂拉越和沙巴人放弃移民自主权。

如果纳兹里觉得不该有移民自主权或马来亚不要和砂沙有同等伙伴国地位，他更应该去问敦拉曼，当年干脆不签 1963年马来西亚协议不是更好？

曾经在内阁多年的纳兹里难道不懂何谓邦国与州属的分别？从他的言论和过去他掌管政治部的记录不难发现他不断剥夺砂拉越人的权益。

为了提防砂拉越的移民自主权再次被极端份子消耗，我们再次的向砂拉越首长提出S4S砂拉越宣言里的诉求，认真考虑恢复护照入境制以保护砂拉越。

日前首相敦马在沙巴马来西亚日致辞更提到： “3200万人民感到骄傲，砂沙在55年前成为马来西亚的一部分” 的言语已经严重藐视砂沙邦国地位，证明敦马完全没有意愿恢复砂沙邦国地位。

这里要特别提醒首相敦马，砂拉越是组成马来西亚联邦的其中一个同等伙伴国，而不是马来西亚的其中一个州属，所以砂拉越绝对不是“成为”马来西亚的一部分,而是共同“组成”马来西亚的一个邦。

联邦在野党有意无意的与首相敦马有着同样举措，那就是剥夺砂拉越自主权而永久剥夺砂拉越人的资源财富。

非常可悲的是，砂拉越人选出的砂拉越希盟议员却完全没有站在砂拉越人的立场捍卫砂拉越，反而保持静静地，也没有反驳马来亚朝野议员进一步剥夺砂拉越的言论。 509 前是砂希盟承诺当选就会把一切主权与资源索回，选民才把票投给你们，不是让你们坐着白领薪水。

自从希盟在509大选执政后，之前大事宣传拥有自主权的砂希盟，不但无法在509大选后展示他们的自主权能力，反而显示出他们处处受制于马来亚党中央。无论是石油税，教育媒介语，MA63或是权力下放等等课题，他们都无从下手，完全不能展示他们有能力去捍卫砂拉越的主权。这难免让砂拉越人对来届的砂拉越大选非常担心，一方面对目前本土阵线的GPS 没有信心，另一方面更担心到处受制于党中央的希盟会让砂拉越步上当年沙巴的后尘，让砂拉越陷入无法翻身之地。

马来亚朝野政客都虎视眈眈的想剥夺砂拉越人丰富的资源占为己有，他们虽然是来自不同阵营，但是明显是冲着砂拉越这片大肥肉而来，想尽办法把砂拉越永远当成马来亚的殖民地，而砂拉越希盟却坐视不救，现在唯有砂拉越人民自己站出来捍卫砂拉越，请政客不要一而再再而三的玩弄砂拉越人的耐性，到时砂拉越人不只毁掉国油，砂拉越人也会让马来西亚联邦瓦解。
</title>
<des>http://eunited.com.my/124602?from=groupmessage

Einstein 5:17 PMhttp://www.theborneopost.com/2018/09/19/no-need-to-go-through-parliament/

KUCHING: Returning the status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia will not be a big issue if the Pakatan Harapan (PH) federal government is serious and sincere, says Assistant Minister of Law, State-Federal Relations and Project Monitoring Sharifah Hasidah Sayeed Aman Ghazali.

She believes that getting two-thirds majority in Parliament to amend the laws can be done.

“I am sure Sabah and Sarawak fully support and Pakatan Harapan elected representative will abide with the prime minister’s decision under the whip system, if the PM says vote, they will vote,” she said.

Sharifah Hasidah also stressed that the federal government can always give back the rights of the two regions through talks and negotiations.

“They can just give back the rights based on the Inter Governmental Committee (ICG) Report 1962 findings.

“The IGC report is very clear. It has to be read with the Federal Constitution. That cannot be simply ignored, the terms and conditions, it can be done without going through parliamentary amendment. They can, if they want to,” she said.
She also questioned the move to conduct a study, again.
“We have formed a team, we went to London, the Malaysia Agreement is there, it has to be recognised, Sabah and Sarawak’s rights must be recognised, what further study do you want?” she asked.
However, she is not ruling out it could be an excuse for the PH government not to restore the status of Sabah and Sarawak.

Sharifah Hasidah insisted that is why Sarawak will enforce Oil and Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958 regardless whether the federal government is restoring Sabah and Sarawak’s rights.

“This is an Ordinance that establishes our rights to oil and gas, that is why it is important if we continue to enforce our licensing rights via OMO.”

Sharifah Hasidah was commenting on Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohammad’s announcement that the New Malaysia and the Pakatan government are aware of this and will restore the status of equal partners to Sabah and Sarawak, during the Malaysia Day celebration at Padang Merdeka, Kota Kinabalu recently.

Dr Mahathir said the restoration of the status as outlined in the MA63 would provide a solid foundation to strengthen the relationship between Sabah, Sarawak and Peninsular Malaysia.

My comments:
Many Sarawakians like me have set our minds to vote Sarawak to quite from the federation of Malaysia for good. I believe that there is no road for return for us anymore. There will be more and more and more and more Sarawakians lining up to join us in the fight for the cause.

Pages

Wednesday, 19 September 2018