Pages

Powered By Blogger

Friday, 2 March 2018

In rural Germany, 'mobile banking' means a bank on a truck



      In rural Germany, 'mobile banking' means a bank on a truck   AFP
Bank manager Juergen Schaller never expected to end up getting a trucker's licence and driving 20,000 kilometres per year.   
       But as brick-and-mortar branches vanish from the rolling Franconia region of northern Bavaria, the neatly dressed savings bank executive jumps behind the wheel four days a week to bring mobile services -- including cash machine and consultation room -- to tiny countryside villages.
       The switch from desk to dashboard has enabled Schaller "to do something else while staying in touch with the customers", he told AFP.
High-street banks are increasingly being forced to shutter branches, as more and more customers go online, rural populations shrink and low interest rates eat into profits.

      As a result, banks such as the public-sector Sparkassen, where Schaller is a branch manager, are having to rethink their business models.
      In Schaller's Kronach-Kulmbach district alone, tucked away in the southeast corner of Germany, six branches sporting the red "S" logo of the widely popular savings banks group closed their doors last year.
       Nico Bandick is a Sparkasse employee in Brandenburg. Photo: DPA
A similar trend is seen across the country as a whole: nationwide, the number of physical bank branches has plunged by a quarter over the past 15 years to 35 per 100,000 people, according to a study by public investment bank KfW.
The European average is 37 per 100,000, with Spaniards the most spoiled for choice with 67.
       Steffen Haberzettl, the sales director for the Kronach-Kulmbach Sparkasse, said it was primarily local businesses and older people who had not embraced online banking who were taking advantage of the mobile branch, which first set off on its rounds in 2015.

'Anything you need'
       Haberzettl estimated that around 20 people visited the bank at each stop, equivalent to 12,000 customer contacts a year -- a tiny number compared with some 8,800 online banking logins per day.
        But "we invested in this service for our clients knowing that it wouldn't make enough money to pay for itself", he said.
       Local politicians who sit on the Sparkasse board were reluctant to plunge their constituents into a bankless wilderness as the number of closures mount.
So, they opted to hit the road instead in one of Germany's 66 itinerant branches.
       In the bank's trailer, 70-something Maria Neubauer is happy to wait for an appointment with Schaller in his tiny office during his 90-minute stop opposite the church in the slate-tiled village of Tschirn.
       "The Sparkasse bus is great for making transfers, or doing anything you need," she said.
       "We're happy, especially those of us who don't have a car" to visit a branch further away, another villager Maria Greiner said as she printed an account statement from a nearby machine.
       Other customers were busy withdrawing cash on the chilly town square from the ATM embedded in the flank of the trailer.
       Schaller makes his rounds to small villages such as this from Monday to Thursday, keeping Fridays free to do maintenance work on the red and white truck and trailer.
       He has no access to the cash on board, and so far he's had no run-ins with would-be bankrobbers.

Closures keep coming 
       Banking sector experts predict that the Europe-wide trend towards fewer bank branches will continue apace.
       "The speed at which it will happen is hard to predict, and will depend above all on how the banks manage to keep branches relevant as a channel for their customers," said Thomas Schnarr of consultancy Oliver Wyman.
       Nevertheless, "human relationships remain fundamental.  Especially complicated questions require personalized advice for retail clients and businesses", his colleague Alexander Peitsch said.
       For his part, Juergen Schaller said he is not qualified to provide such specialist counselling to his clients, many of whom know him by name.
Instead, he passes on individual requests for loans or investments to a colleague sitting in one of the Sparkasse's brick-and-mortar branches.

My comments:
Germany is a country that I would like to visit if I have a chance.
My 3rd sister's second daughter just came back today on students' exchange for a year there.  She should have had a lot of surprising and interesting exposure there.

Wednesday, 28 February 2018

A letter to SMC 28/2/2018


On behalf of Sibu people who may need to park their cars at the back lane behind the building tenanted by Hong Leong bank, Sugar bun or Asia commercial Institute, I request SMC to demarcate the left hand side of the back lane into parking bays in parallel to the parking bays on the right hand side of the said lane.

It is understood that there are no enough parking spaces in the town especially the areas near Sibu Central Market.  The situation has become even worse when SMC has turned three levels of the parking lots in Sibu Central Market into Urban Transformation Centre without considering the needs of the people.  I used to park my car at the parking area in Sibu Central Market.  But nowadays, it is hard for me to find the parking space there.

Hence, I parked my car behind the said building tenanted by Hong Leong bank, Sugar Bun or Asia Commercial Institute when I went marketing.  But today, I was slapped with a fine by the enforcement police for parking my car there.  It seems to me that our enforcement police are especially concerned about the illegal parking in the back lane.  Who has driven us to this distressful situation?  Is it fair to us?   I was enraged when I received the summon.

Besides, I hope SMC as a local government will think of every possible way to improve the public transport in Sibu so that many people would be released from the bondage of using private transport and free people from worries where to park their cars.  Is it not the fault of the government to force people to use the private transport and create the problem of not having enough parking spaces to accommodate the cars? 




Friday, 23 February 2018

Tweets 23/2/2018 赡养父母



Tweets  23/2/2018  赡养父母
标题:立法强制子女赡养父母 -- 有人赞同;有人非议 (星洲日报)
张庆信张大人(民都鲁区国会议员)反对在民都鲁建安老院。 他认为供养父母是儿女福份。这些话张大人已经重复过不止一次。 张大人在巴生港口[捞得风水起]的人肯定不知道这个大道理是不必他重复的。 那些弃养父母的人,100%的人是连自己都无法照顾好的。别说照顾父母。张大人只懂得在冷气房里做很多不真实的假设。还有些老人没有家庭,哪来儿女? 不建安老院,能解决无家可归的老人吗或弃养父母的改变主意养父母了吗? 怎么这么低能? 民都鲁人民怎么选人/人?
有能力供养父母的,谁会弃养父母?
        来,有经济问题的儿女,政府每月提供RM600 供养费养一个。养双亲一个月RM1200。张大人为什么不是这么想呢?
     老人家靠穷苦的儿女养心中有多少的无奈和不乐。 如果越来越多人弃养父母或子女,政府真的要好好检讨自己的政策。怎么搞的会造成这种贫富两级化

Saturday, 17 February 2018

theborneopost.com

Don’t praise Najib just yet, says See

See Chee How
       KUCHING: Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Tun Openg and the Sarawak state government should stop singing praises of Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Tun Razak when nothing material and definite with regards Sarawak’s autonomous rights under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and devolution of power to Sarawak is delivered from Putrajaya, or they may risk losing support of Sarawakians for their candidates in Sarawak, said Batu Lintang assemblyman See Chee How.
      See was commenting on Abang Johari’s statement at Parti Pesaka Bumiputera Bersatu (PBB) convention on Saturday, officiated by Najib, that the latter (Najib) had done a lot for Sarawak and that Sarawakians should be grateful for it and return the favour.
     “The promise by Najib that the power and the rights of the people in Sarawak taken away ‘by design or inadvertently’ will be returned to Sarawak has turned stale.
      “It has gone backward because the Prime Minister has a new promise that a high-level committee at the federal level would be established to negotiate with Sarawak on outstanding rights issues under the MA63.
      “The ship is still in the dock, at Putrajaya,” exclaimed See, who is also state PKR vice-chairman yesterday.
       Najib, in his speech at the PBB convention, gave his assurance that he is sincere when it comes to returning what rightly belongs to the people of Sarawak.
     “I have promised, if we have by design or inadvertently, took the power and the rights of the people in Sarawak, I am willing to return them back to Sarawak. We don’t need to take the rights of other people. We are in one family. What is important is, we remain in the BN government and our country Malaysia,” Najib was quoted as saying.
       In response to Abang Johari’s speech that Sarawak had during the last State Legislative Assembly sitting passed a government motion to form a high-level special taskforce to take over the state’s negotiation with the federal government, Najib said a high-level committee at the federal level would be established to negotiate with Sarawak on outstanding rights issues under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
       See said Najib should not point fingers at others for the wrongs of the federal government taking away Sarawak’s rights over the last 55 years.
     “Not only was he in the federal government for the most part of the 55 years, he (Najib) was already the prime minister when the Territorial Sea Act 2012 was passed to cause the biggest blow to Sarawak’s territorial integrity and sovereignty and he has until today not say a word about Sarawak’s request for repeal and/or amendment.”
       See was referring to the government’s motion on Sarawak’s rights, which included the seeking of amendment to Territorial Sea Act 2012, which was unanimously passed by the Sarawak Legislative Assembly in 2015.
    “The late Datuk Patinggi Tan Sri Adenan Satem had made the representation to Putrajaya during his reign as the Chief Minister of Sarawak. The present CM should take up the responsibility to continue with the representation if he is sincere to follow through the legacy of the late Tok Nan. If we cannot safeguard our territorial integrity and sovereign rights to our territory, what is there for Sarawak?
     “We must also be reminded that the late Tok Nan did not brag about the Prime Minister and the federal government during his time as the Chief Minister of Sarawak. In fact, he had put in place measures to ensure that the federal government and agencies will come to the negotiation table with Sarawak, with regards to their exploits in the State,” See pointed out.
       See said the pledge that the federal government would chip in for the state’s Light Railway Transit (LRT) project if Sarawakians voted for BN with an ‘A+’ results “is laughable and an insult to the intelligence of Sarawakians”.
     “Not only are all Malaysians suffering the wrath of the country’s unprecedented huge debts, Sarawakians are living the hardship of the federal government’s empty and unrealised promises.
     “Sarawak is now suffering from the tremendous damages caused by flooding because the flood mitigation projects and plans were stalled due to the lack of funds.  Further, the promised funding for rebuilding of dilapidated schools are not given to Sarawak but through federal ministries and agencies.   Conceivably, only a fraction of the RM1 billion will be spent on the rebuilding of schools in Sarawak.”
With the general election just around the corner, See said the prime minister and the federal ministers will certainly make more and frequent visits to Sarawak to pledge for development projects and financial allocations.
     “And there will be promises for autonomy and devolution of powers according to MA63. I do believe that Sarawakians have wised up to those pledges and promises which have tricked and eluded Sarawak for the last 55 years.”
In conclusion, See said Sarawakians should count the promises delivered, with regards Sarawak’s autonomous rights under the MA63 and devolution of power to Sarawak delivered by the federal government, before deciding to vote in the same federal government again.

My comments:
"Sarawak enjoys the lion's share. Sarawak enjoys the lion's share. Sarawak enjoys the lion's share. Sarawak enjoys the lion's share.  Sarawak enjoys the lion's share."   This has been the ploys of UMNO-BNised government to trick and fool Sarawakians and Sabahans about the allocations when ?% of allocation funds have actually reached us.  Otherwise, we won't see a great number of dilapidated schools, hospitals lack of the equipment, poor road conditions, devastating floods occur again and again,  .....................

I hope that Sarawakians will have this awareness. 

Harapan Rakyat ada harapan kah untuk Sarawak and Sabah?



Harapan Rakyat ada harapan kah untuk Sarawak and Sabah?
If Harapan Rakyat will have harapan untuk rakyat, the right person to seat the PM post should be Dr. Wan Azizah, not Dr. Mahathir who carries tonnes of sinful acts during his 22+ years of tenure as PM.  The sight and thought of him still send chill to many who know how he blundered through his ministry and plundered us, Sarawakians and Sabahans.   Those who have the knowledge know so well how domineering he was and humiliatingly he treated us Sarawakians and Sabahans. 

It is a grave mistake to designate him to be PM if HR wins in the 14th general election.  It is idiotic for Sarawakians and Sabahans to indulge in the so called ‘national / general election’ in which we are only treated as one of the 13 states to be battered and bullied in the so called ‘national assembly’ all the time.  It is meaningless and insensible of us to take part in the so called ‘national election’.

It is grosteque and ridiculous for Sarawak and Sabah to take part in the so called ‘national election’ to fight against the 11 states in Peninsular Malaya.    That means that we accept being one of the 13 states in the Federation of Malaysia.  Is it sensible for us to do so?   But do the UMNO-BNised parties in Sarawak and Sabah want to assert themselves as an individual country in the federation of Malaysia and refuse being fooled, tricked and trapped anymore?

I hope that Sarawakians and Sabahans can stop this practice once and for all.
Now is that how we can undo this practice to be treated as one of the 13 states.  Now is that how Sarawak and Sabah each can stand up as a country without being mixed-up with the 11 states in the Peninsular Malaya.  How…………………………………………………………..?