Pages

Powered By Blogger

Saturday, 11 June 2016

World’s first humanitarian summit focuses on root causes of conflicts



World’s first humanitarian summit focuses on root causes of conflicts

ISTANBUL, May 23, 2016 (Xinhua) -- UN Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson (L) speaks to the reporters during a World Humanitarian Summit press conference in Istanbul, Turkey on May 23, 2016. The world's first-ever humanitarian summit is determined to focus more on the root causes of the ongoing conflicts rather than symptoms for their solutions, said UN Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson on Monday. (Xinhua/Zhao Dingzhe)

ISTANBUL, May 23 (Xinhua) -- The world's first-ever humanitarian summit is determined to focus more on the root causes of the ongoing conflicts rather than symptoms for their solutions, said UN Deputy Secretary-General Jan Eliasson on Monday.

Some leaders present for the World Humanitarian Summit joined a roundtable discussion on the issue of "political leadership to prevent and end conflicts," part of multi-faceted exchanges over how to make the current humanitarian aid system better to cope with the worst level of human sufferings since World War II.

Eliasson, speaking to reporters after the discussion, said there was "a great degree of unity" among the leaders about the fact that the international community has been focusing too much on the ongoing crises while underestimating the pre-conflict phase and conflict resolutions.

"We start to realize that the life of conflicts is much longer than we usually think of," he noted, saying the "burning houses and dying children" is only a small part of the whole conflict.

He said the world leaders have also seen the need to extend the definition of conflict in a way that would include "listening to the first vibration on the ground and act over that signal."

In Eliasson's view, prevention of conflicts is a competitive advantage of UN.

Xavier Bettel, prime minister of Luxembourg, told reporters that high spirit of solidarity in Europe will cross its borders and a "common will" will be soon adopted to overcome humanitarian crises.

Bettel also urged the international community to meet each year to assess progress being made so as to make the summit a real success.

Erastus Mwencha, deputy chairperson of African Union, told Xinhua that there is a strong need to develop a mechanism at the local level to deal with the needs of displaced people and to coordinate the humanitarian assistance in Africa.

He stressed the need for political leadership to help the 15 million people in need in Africa. "Otherwise the aid becomes a problem in itself," he added.

"Political leadership to prevent and end conflict" is considered as one of the most important commitments set by UN Secretary General Ban Ki-moon for the Istanbul summit that involves delivering concrete policy and operational commitments.

The two-day summit is drawing some 5,200 participants, including 65 heads of state and government.

Related:
UN chief launches humanitarian aid efficiency improvement scheme

ISTANBUL, May 23 (Xinhua) -- UN Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon launched a scheme Monday aiming to significantly improve the efficiency of humanitarian aid, as part of the efforts to bridge the funding gap, at the World's First Humanitarian Summit.

"This Grand Bargain is a major step forward in humanitarian financing," said Ban at a ceremony in Istanbul's Congress Center, where the World's First Humanitarian Summit took place. Full story

My comments:

     I hope the United Nations has a unit to investigate unfair election practices prevailing in underdeveloped and developing countries to prevent unrest or restless to take place or more serious happenings to occur   
     I hope the United Nations have read and gone through the petitions Sarawakians and Sabahans have submitted.  We Sarawakians and Sabahans are angry about how we are treated in the Federation of Malaysia.   
     The grave problems we face is the collusion between the political thugs of Barisan National of Sarawak or Sabah and those in Peninsular Malaya.  Thus hey have plundered and explolited Sarawak and Sabah at will since 1963.  The people in general are really angry about these unfair practices and treatments. 
     Besides the practices of election are densely corrupt and unfair.  Democracy is not upheld in Malaysia.  It is counted by the number of seats won not by the number of voters.  The tremor of this angry is felt everywhere except the rural areas where the people are shackled by ignorance and poverty. 
     I hope this unrest can be dealt with properly before it is developed into armed unrest.  Long years of unfairness and injustice are the main causes of unrest everywhere in the world.  Prove me wrong if you can.

Friday, 10 June 2016

Who are the traitors selling Sarawak for a lot of money and power?



Who are the traitors selling Sarawak for a lot of money and power?

Once I thought Sarawak had a very, very, very, very …………. large land area.  It was because Taib Mahmud, the Chief Minister of Sarawak for 33 years and having various ministerial posts for 22 plus years always exclaimed that the terrain of Sarawak was just too large to be developed.  Hence,  he only planned 20 miles of road to be built a year if I am not mistaken.  I hope someone will check for me how many miles of road had been constructed and how much money had been embezzled during his reign as a Chief Minister of Sarawak for 33 years.

Another skill he employed to calm down Sarawakians was to ask them to wait patiently for the development while he himself plundered and exploited impatiently or speedily. 

With the comparison of the land area with different countries, I realised that Sarawak is really not so large as I once imagined it to be.  It is the mentality of the leader that count.  How much he or she cares to develop the country as a whole versus to build up one’s ultra mega wealth at the expense of people instead.  Sarawak has been let down by both Abdul Rahman Yaccob and Taib Mahmud especially. 

As the head leader of the member country, he collude with UMNO-BN pf                  the Malayan government to plunder and exploit Sarawak at will.  Shamelessly, he takes the seat as the governor of Sarawak and he advised the Sarawak government led by Adenan Satem to keep all the promises made during the 11th Sarawak election when he broke every promise people can name of during his 33+ as the Chief Minister of Sarawak.  He never cared to establish Sarawak as an equal partner country in the Federation of Malaysia. 

For 33 + years, Taib Mahmud and his team collude with UMNO-BN political thugs to plunder and exploit Sarawak at will.  Adenan Satem is said to have been his adviser for years.   

Adenan Satem won 87% in the 11th  Sarawak election.  Is he going to establish Sarawak as a member country, not a state?  We want to see how assertive he is to establish Sarawak as a member country. and what he is going to do to establish his stance.  How is he  going to deal with the “Federal Departments” in Sarawak?  How is he going to deal with the Stamp Duty?  

Taiwan should be a good reference to us Sarawakians.  Yes, it is the political will to establish Sarawak as a member country, not a state.  The 11 states in the Peninsular Malaya are in the Federation of Malaya, definitely, not in the Federation of Malaysia which I see clearly now is made up of three member countries Sarawak, Sabah and the Malaya Peninsular.

Hence it does not really make sense of Sarawak and Sabah to take part in 2018 “14 national election” which I see is solely for the 11 states in the Peninsular Malaya, not including  Sarawak and Sabah.  So I hope all the Sarawakians and Sabahans just refuse to indulge in the make-believes of the UMNO-BN  evil tricks anymore. 

Sarawak is a member country and we only have an election.  We should restart the election for the local government for good.  I hope Sarawak Prime Minister Adenan Satem with the trust of 87% of the people will establish the record-breaking move again to declare Sarawak as a member country and have the autonomy based on MA63.  The changed laws through the process by different evil hands are not counted to be legitimate. 

If you cannot make your brother be your son; nor your sister your daughter,; ……… you just cannot make changes at will with the MA63. 

I hope Adenan Satem will assert this iron-like fact strongly without fear.  By addressing Sarawak as a state is just like changing your status as a brother or sister to be the son or daughter.  Adenan Satem is a trained lawyer  and he should know better.  But now he has the power to lead his team to create a new Sarawak if he has the political will to realise the way.

Since for the past 53 years, Sarawak has been remade and reformed in UMNO-BN ways, with the general awareness, I hope Adenan Satem and his team will do something to make and reform Sarawak to be a member country, not a state subordinate to the “central government”  and undo all the evilness of UMNO-BN. 

To re-establish Sarawak as a member country having the autonomy, it is to carry out.  It is not necessary to get it passed in the so called “Parliamentary assembly/国会  Remember Sarawak is a country by virtue.  Look at Taiwan and what the President of Taiwan does.  Or the commonwealth countries, an individual country has its own equal entity, you see.  Now what we Sarawakians do is to establish ourselves as a member country in the Federation of Malaysia or get prepared to secede.



砂火箭蓝眼愿与国阵同阵线 结合逾200国会议员促修宪

(古晋9日讯)火箭与蓝眼表明立场,愿意与国阵合计3分之2的国会议员力量,促成国会修改联邦宪法,进而达到自主权下放予砂州。
砂民主行动党和砂人民公正党的领袖声称,为了解除国阵因没有3分2国会议席而无法寻求修改联邦宪法,以让砂拉越政府要求联邦政府下放自主权的障碍,两党愿意和国阵在这课题上,与国阵站同一阵线,以“凑足”所需达到修宪之目的。

身为砂行动党主席的古晋与哥打圣淘沙区国州议员张健仁今日在州立法议会媒体室举行与公正党的联合新闻发布会,针对其提出促请砂州政府尽速向联邦政府进行谈判,争取权力下放予砂州的动议被议长驳回一事,如是发表声明。

他说,议长拿督阿玛阿斯菲亚是以权力下放须在国会修改联邦宪法,而国阵在国会却没有3分2的议席为由而驳回其动议。

为此,他指出,在222个国会议席中,国阵拥有134名国会议员,而行动党和公正党合计有68名。(行动党38人,及公正党30人)

“行动党和公正党若和国阵的134位国会议员合计起来就有202位国会议员,这已超过3分之2的绝大多数议席。因此,就有望修改宪法,要求中央政府下放权力予砂州政府。”

他表示,砂州行动党和公正党是同意下放自主权益事宜,4大自主权领域为税务、教育、医药及警务。

“如砂州政府有意愿,就可以提呈动议,要求修改联邦宪法,至于其它细节可以容后再处理,最主要的是要先确立好大原则。”

另一方面,身为砂人民公正党主席的巴卡拉兰区州议员巴鲁比安评论议长驳回张健仁所提呈动议的理由之一,即国阵在国会没有3分2议席的理由是言之过早的裁决。

他解释称,最重要的是,下放砂州自主权益的动议必须在砂州立法议会先行通过,才有望带入国会,进行提呈。

Mycomments:
砂的政权以MA63 契约为依归,其他的的宪法的更改过程都是违反国际公约的做法,所以DAP和PKR 不要在那里玩什么国会通不通过的事。  砂就是一个会员国。  砂本来就是一个主权国。 现在人民要看到的就是砂国部长先生,小姐和女士们敢敢的自主。  不是什么都是要什么“国会”通过。  砂拉越就是一个国像Singapore, Brunei, Taiwan。。。。。等等。  砂在马来西亚联邦是会员国。 砂要自主就是要从人民代表要懂得自主开始。

Friday, 3 June 2016

Land area in square miles to compare with.



Land mass in square miles.       population

Sarawak      48,050 mi²                         2.636 million

Prosperity Index: Top 20
1 Norway          148,718 mi²                   5.084 million (2013)
2 Switzerland    15,940 mi²             8.081 million (2013)
3 New Zealand 103,483 mi²            4.471 million (2013)
4 Denmark        16,574 mi²             5.614 million (2013)
5 Canada           3.855 million mi²   35.16 million (2013)
6 Sweden          173,860 mi²            9.593 million (2013)
7 Australia        2.97 million mi²     23.13 million (2013)
8 Finland           130,666 mi²          5.439 million (2013)
9 Netherlands   16,040 mi²           16.8 million  (2013)
10 United States 3.806 million mi²        318.9 million (2014)
11 Iceland         39,769 mi²           323,002 (2013)
12 Ireland         32,595 mi²             4.595 million (2013)
13 United Kingdom   94,058 mi²      64.1 million (2013)
14. Scotland            30,918 mi²      5.295 million (2011)


England              50,346 mi²             53 million     
Wales               8,016 mi²                3.063 million  (2011)

Northern Ireland  5,345 mi²
14 Germany                  137,903 mi² 


Land area in square miles to compare with. 

Sarawak      48,050 mi²
Prosperity Index: Top 20
1 Norway          148,718 mi²
2 Switzerland    15,940 mi²
3 New Zealand 103,483 mi²
4 Denmark        16,574 mi²
5 Canada           3.855 million mi²
6 Sweden          173,860 mi²
7 Australia        2.97 million mi²
8 Finland           130,666 mi²
9 Netherlands   16,040 mi²
10 United States 3.806 million mi²
11 Iceland         39,769 mi²
12 Ireland         32,595 mi²
13 United Kingdom   94,058 mi²
Scotland             30,918 mi²
England              50,346 mi²
Wales                 8,016 mi²
Northern Ireland  5,345 mi²
14 Germany                  137,903 mi²