Pages

Powered By Blogger

Friday, 18 March 2016

摩天楼乃权力的显现

作者:林建荣
一座地標的建筑,不只可代表著一个城市的风貌,敘述著它的故事及歷史,背后更是一种权力的显现。就如国油双子塔对敦马哈迪而言,这摩天楼不只提高了马来西亚的形象,更是他的政绩遗產之一。

如今由纳吉执政下,推动兴建的独立国投118层摩天楼,一旦完成,將会是全球第5高及全国最高的建筑,並將会成为首都的新地標。这也令人疑问,纳吉是否要通过兴建此摩天楼,把兴建国油双子塔的马哈迪比下去?

当 然,令人关注的是独立国投摩天楼在2010年提出时,曾面对著社会的反对声浪,这些反对的理由,如將对附近学校,甚至社区带来的社会成本:交通的 阻塞、国家文化遗產的破坏,是否就此不存在了呢?更令人担忧的是,这项巨型计划下增加的购物商场及办公楼面积,会否加剧市场目前已过剩的局面,最终沦为另 一项白象计划?

相比起把资源投放在教育领域,推动大型建设如基建及地產发展,不只可短期內带动起经济成长,转移许多眼前的问题,包括政治上的挑战,甚至把体制结构的弊端隱藏起来。

然而一旦这些投资建设,欠缺经济效益,缺乏需求,將会带来灾害式的浪费,甚至会否陷入「劳伦斯魔咒」,即摩天大楼建成之日,也將是经济衰退之时?

尤其当一项发展的决定,不以市场为依归,不考量地方上的需求及民情时,反由一小部分特权精英拍板决定,其结果不只是对社区自主的破坏,其带来的资源的浪费,也等於是一种人民看不见的税收,更形成把公共的財富或资源,转移到管理不佳的地方政府或国企身上。
最终,这只会导致贪污腐败的风气,甚至阻住了社会合理的发展。

Thursday, 17 March 2016

“Hello, can you rain not more than 150mm?”

“HELLO, please do not release water from the dam because our place is now flooded.” An engineer, who is a friend of a friend, working at the Bakun Dam site constantly receives such distress calls when it rains heavily in Kapit, Kanowit, Sibu and other places at the lower reaches of the Rajang River and water from the drains rise.

“At most times, there was no rain in the Ulu, and there was no excessive water to be released into the river,” he said.

But this is one big problem that we are facing. Every each year, in cities and towns throughout the state, our people have a number of days ruined by flash floods. So far, the state capital residents have had the worst this year. In the shortest month of February, though with an extra day in this leap year, we have had three major floods in this southern part of the *Sarawak.

It was especially annoying for many because the first of the month’s floods ruined the Chinese New Year’s Eve dinner of many families. It was devastating for even more because they had barely cleaned their houses and replaced their damaged belongings when their houses were again flooded and they suffered more losses. This is one of the worst in years, with more than 8,000 residents in the southern region being evacuated from their homes to flood relief centres.

In addition, the state is also suffering its heaviest losses in damage to public infrastructure and property.

“There were at least 194 incidents of landslides and embankment failures in southern Sarawak this February,” the federal Works Minister revealed.
The “abnormally heavy rainfall” is to be blamed, according to this federal minister. Sure, what else. The minister is not legally trained, hence he is ignorant of the basic legal tenor that one does not accuse or lay blame on another who is not there or could not avail himself to defend the accusation made against him.

According to him, the state capital’s drainage system was designed for 150 to 180mm of rainfall, while the average has been 90mm. But he said: “in the latter incident, there was rainfall of 300mm, hence the Sarawak General Hospital, Sarawak police headquarters and the inner city fire station, all built on higher ground and which have never being flooded before, were flooded.”

The stunning pictures of a patient being carried up the staircases to the upper floor of the Sarawak General Hospital, and the floating swirling chairs in the Sarawak* police headquarters were shared thousands of times on social media sites and those scenes will haunt Kuchingites incessantly every time there is a downpour, until the *Sarawak capital’s drainage system is improved.

Barely two days after the federal minister said that the all-important offices to combat and cure disasters are built on higher ground and have never been flooded before, the fire station was reportedly flooded again, as my constituent shared with me the photographs he took.

No statistics of that night’s rainfall was revealed. My calculated guess is 50mm?

I was hoping that the same federal minister would give us an explanation, but there was none.

There are many causes for flash floods, we cannot just look up and point our finger to the sky and blame it on “abnormally heavy rainfall”. In fact, we Kuching city folk were much blessed that morning because it was all sunshine and not raining upriver.

Maybe this is the first time that the city capital and its vicinity was flooded three times in a month, but the flooding of Kuching and the whole state is an annual phenomena. We have flood mitigation plans and projects being approved for the whole Sarawak, many were announced a long time ago. It appears that these projects are not making progress.

My mother, although never having spent a day in government office, reminded me that any good government should take flood mitigation work seriously. The three successive emperors of ancient China: Yao, Shun and Yu were exemplary rulers. Their visions and commitment to do the best for the populace of their part of the world brought socioeconomic progression and prosperity to not only the subjects of one of the earliest civilisations 4,000 years ago, but the people of the most populated country today.

During their reign, these three emperors were noted for their feats in the re-engineering of the enormously diverse and monstrous river systems in primordial China for irrigation, inland river navigation and flood mitigation.

Of course, they were not qualified engineers. They were equipped with only basic knowledge that the water will flow towards the lower part of the land, and by travelling the length and breath of the country, they knew her topographic features and characteristics as if they were written and drawn on their palms. In fact, Emperor Shun and Yu were made emperors because of their dedication and leadership in the river engineering works and were most loved and adored by the people. They had* no blood ties with their predecessors and were not from royal families.

The perseverance and devotion of these noble rulers finally paid off by the eighth year of the reign of Emperor Great Yu.  By that time, more than 4,000 years ago, nine largest river systems in the vast country of China were engineered to flow east into the sea, navigating through at least 11 mountain ranges on their way. The monumental accomplishment resulted in the irrigation of huge plains for agricultural activities, extensive networks of waterways for inland navigation, and minimising the threats and hazards of flooding.

The Great Wall of China had served its defensive purposes and its massive construction work was hailed as one of mankind’s greatest architectural and engineering feats.

In my own humble opinion, the combined effort of Emperors Yao, Shun and Yu to devise and engineer the enormously diverse and monstrous river systems in China for irrigation, navigation and flood mitigation was a much more significant human attainment.

Without extensive irrigation for farmlands, there is no way the country could sustain a population of 1.4 billion citizens today. Without their flood mitigation measures, the disastrous and massive losses of lives and property in Chinese history before them would have continued to ravage the country. It was not only their foresight, but their personal touch to be with the people, to lead them in overcoming the adversities that have made them bigger leaders and rulers than they were.

Hence, I was hopeful that our Prime Minister would visit some of the flood-hit areas during his Chinese New Year visit to Sarawak, and make generous allocations for flood relief assistance and expedite federal financial disbursement for approved flood mitigation plans and projects.

It was unfortunate that he did not respond to the enthusiastic request and reminder by our Chief Minister. Citing concerns for the financial implications on the federal coffers, he left Sarawak for the safer national capital which has all the modern engineering facilities and infrastructure to contain excessive and incessant rainfall.

It is no wonder that the approval rating for his office is on free fall and a citizens’ movement has been initiated to remove him, calling for the restoration of the integrity of the country’s constitutional, legal and administrative institutions. The "Chief Minister"  has made the right move to designate a senior minister to gather all the ministerial and departmental heads for a joint effort to discuss a long-term solution to improve the drainage system to combat and contain flash floods in the cities.

Indeed, we should seriously looking into the development and improvement of existing drainage systems and to devise plans to straightening, deepening, widening, and cementing of the riverbanks and substrates to form canals or monsoon drains in the cities.

There are measures that we can undertake to prevent and mitigate flash floods, definitely not asking the federal works minister to make a call to the sky and say “hello, can you limit the rainfall to 150mm?”
Or can he?

My Comments:
Be prepared to establish Sarawak as a country and develop Sarawak ourselves.  Stop them from plundering and exploiting us anymore!!!!

*I have changed it from state to Sarawak.
"Chief Minister" should be changed to "Prime Minister of Sarawak".  Najib is the Prime Minister of Peninsular Malaysia.  So, stop Najib and Zahid Hamidi as well as other UMNO leaders from coming here to "clown and monkey "play themselves.
Print Friendly
What do you think of this story?
  • Great (100%)
  • Interesting (0%)
  • Nothing (0%)
  • Sad (0%)
  • Angry (0%)

Read more: http://www.theborneopost.com/2016/03/06/hello-can-you-rain-not-more-than-150mm/#ixzz438qD0kb0

Wednesday, 16 March 2016

Tweets 17/3/2016 选谁?



Tweets 17/3/2016   选谁?
部长陈赛明曰:‘州选举设选首长非首相‘。 这好像是也好像不是。无论如何,只要是BN集团胜利,也就是Najib的集团胜利了。 大公司都是靠他的子公司赚钱而赚钱。就是这么简单。 大家尤其是DayaksDayaks是最容易蒙骗一族群。  因为Dayaks是最听话的。这也是他们的文化。 大家都听[屋长][部长]的。就是了。

如果大家还一样[听你]的,就是了。 永远被掠夺和剥削,还是不知道。 砂拉越永远是一个州的身份。 任人切割。 BN集团赢,Fatimah 陈,肯定还是很悠哉游哉的坐官位领高薪。 要不要再 ? 次选她。 看业绩。她到底为[拉叻]  还记得吗? 2014Balingan选举时,有7个许诺,开始进行了几项? 数数看。

自己不懂得维护自己是自己最大的败笔。 今天的Dalat是大家的共业。 这共业的层次,好坏,品质全是大家的共和。 除非,Dalat没有其他的代表了。你们没有选择的余地。 切忌!切记!
即时新闻
ba1601d

陈赛明:国阵需大胜 州选决定首长非首相

(本报民都鲁16日讯)砂妇女、福利与家庭发展部长拿督法蒂玛陈赛明指出,在第11届砂拉越州选举中,选民决定的乃是砂州首席部长,而不是选出我国首相。

她指出,砂首席部长丹斯里阿迪南沙登曾夸奖我国首相拿督斯里纳吉,乃是一名非常关心砂拉越发展的首相。

纳吉近年来频访砂
她表示,纳吉近年来不断前来砂州进行拜访,且每次前来砂州时,不是空手而来,而是不断捎来好消息及惠民政策。

拿督法蒂玛陈赛明于今早出席“时事课题研讨会”致词时,如是宣称。
她称,在第11届砂拉越州选举中,国阵必须赢取最大的胜利,若是有可能,国阵必须赢取72个或以上的州议席,以彻底的击垮在野党。

她续称,为了支持阿迪南沙登继续担任砂拉越首席部长一职,土保党早已在第13届全国大选后便开始许多准备工作。

“我们早已在两年前便开始备战工作,我们除了积极拜访选民及训练演讲人才之外,也举办选民注册及入党活动。”

鼓励游子回乡投票
身兼达叻州议员的法蒂玛陈赛明劝请出席者,必须要时刻检查最新的选民名单,除了借此机会深入了解选民的需要之外,也要积极鼓励在外坡工作的选民回乡投票。

她认为,应对选举小组必须要清楚知道外坡选民占据了当中的数量,并努力的致电,以鼓励游子们回乡投票。

Tweets 17/3/2016 张庆信说/曰:



Tweets 17/3/2016  张庆信说/曰:
张庆信说TaibMahmud是“砂“‘州‘’的发展之父]。如果是的话,那么他就是[巴生港口]发展功臣之一。

他说:[做老师的不可以混水摸鱼] 没有错。做老师的不可以混水摸鱼虾。

我说:[做部长的,肯定也不可清水/混水摸鱼虾。]

他也跟Bintulu汽车公会说:[做事不可以只为利益]

我说: [这是彼此彼此。互相要时时提醒。]

张庆信在PKFZ一定有大作为。从他曾经拥有两架私人飞机来看。这真的是不简单啊!

我看有人[]字是贴在屁股上,在后面,所以。。。。

Why an independent Scotland could become the richest country on Earth

On a per capita basis, the nation has all the ingredients to be one of the world's most prosperous nations










An independent Scotland could become the richest country on earth. I’m not joking. It has all the necessary ingredients. Let me explain.
Each year the World Bank, the IMF and the CIA each independently publish a list of the richest countries in the world - as measured by GDP per capita at purchasing power parity.

The UK sits at a rather disappointing 21st, but topping those rankings you have the likes of Qatar, Luxembourg, Singapore, Brunei, Norway and Switzerland.

Some of these nations have got there thanks to their oil. But oil isn’t everything – otherwise the likes of Saudi Arabia (28th), Russia (43rd) or Iran (78th) would feature.

Others have got there because they are financial or commercial centres. But the same regulatory options that have enabled them to be so are open to other countries - they have just not been adopted.

There is, however, one characteristic common to all the top ten ranking nations, bar one. It is that they are small. In the top five, Singapore and Norway both have around 5 million; Qatar 3 million; Luxembourg and Brunei around half a million.

The one exception is the US. It ranks 6th (IMF), 7th (World Bank) and 14th (CIA). In 1950, and indeed in 1970, it was top. Back then though, its states were semi-autonomous and, on a gold standard, its money was independent. As its state has grown and power become more centralized, its ranking has slid.

This is because there is a direct correlation between the size of the state and the wealth of the people - the bigger the former, the smaller the latter. The more power is concentrated, the less wealth is spread.

But in a small nation, forced to live from a smaller tax base, there is more of a limit to how big state institutions can grow. Monitoring becomes more efficient, it is harder to obfuscate, so there is more transparency and accountability, and less waste. Change is easier to implement, making a nation flexible, dynamic and competitive. With fewer people, there is less of a wealth gap between those at the top and the bottom.

The evidence of history is that the free-est countries with the widest dispersal of power have always been the most prosperous and innovative.
The city-states of pre- and early-Renaissance Italy are a good example. There was no single ruling body except for the Roman Catholic Church.

If people, ideas or innovation were suppressed in one state, they could quickly move to another, so there was competition. Venice, in particular, showed great innovation in turning apparently useless marsh into a unique, thriving city. Renaissance Italy became breathtakingly prosperous and produced some of the greatest individuals that ever lived.

But it would be overtaken by Protestant northern Europe. The bible was translated into local vernacular, and Gutenberg’s printing press furthered the spread of knowledge – and thus the decentralization of power. The pace was set by Holland, also made up of many small states, then Britain led the pack. In spite of its union with Scotland and its later empire building, England would disperse centralized power by reducing the authorities of the monarch after the Civil War of 1642–51, and later by linking its currency to gold.

Since its unification in the late 19th century, Italy has been nothing like the force it once was, blighted by infighting, bureaucracy, organized crime, corruption, rent- seeking, inflation and division. Its state is bloated, its political system dysfunctional.

So back to Scotland.
It now has the opportunity to enact the same legislation, taxation and regulation that other top ten countries on that list employ, following, say, the blueprint of Singapore. It already has a rich tradition in trade, finance and banking.

It has the oil.
And, with just five million people, it is small.

pg-8-salmond-getty.jpg
Scottish First Minister Alex Salmond presents the White Paper for Scottish independence
  
It has all the ingredients to be the richest country on earth – on a per capita basis. It has ‘the triple’. I can think of no other nation in the world with such a wonderful opportunity.

The Scottish contribution to the world, whether in engineering, invention, industry or finance, has been astounding.  Think Adam Smith, Alexander Fleming, John Logie Baird, James Watt.  You cannot doubt Scottish talent - they are a formidable people. But they do not dominate the global stage as they once did.  There will be a tough period of adjustment to get through, yes, but independent, living off their tax base, with dynamism and self-belief restored, they can do so once again.

But, first, they must make the right choices.
Dominic Frisby is the author of Life After The State. An audiobook version is available here.

Independent Sarawak: To be or not to be

 | May 3, 2014
It may remain a dream as the people are economically, culturally and socially dependent on Malaya (Peninsular).
COMMENT
SarawakRevolt is brewing on the internet with calls for a people’s referendum in 2016 for Sarawak to withdraw from the Malaysia Agreement and stand independent in 2018.
But is Sarawak ready to be independent?

In order to be independent in 2018, Sarawakians must be prepared to leave their ‘comfort zone’.

They must be prepared to go through enormous changes and most importantly shed their dependence on Malaysia and Malaya (Peninsular).
Truth is Sarawakians are dependent and ‘addicted’ to all things Malayan.

After more than 50 years in the Federation of Malaysia, Sarawakians have become entrenched in the Peninsular Malayan culture.

To divorce themselves now from Malaya might be easier said than done.
Sarawakians are economically, culturally, socially and personally bound to Malaya.

A large number of Sarawakians are working in Malayan companies or attached to federal departments and agencies.

These folk may not be so enthusiastic to see Sarawak separate from Malaysia.

Heavily influenced society
Sarawakians are also highly dependent on Malayan goods and services, even when better and cheaper local alternatives are available.

Local products have over the years been portrayed as being of ‘substandard quality’ and even ‘hazardous’, hence the bias.

The Malayan culture and lifestyle heavily influences the Sarawakians’ daily life through Malay literature, films, TV shows, songs and sports (i.e Malaysia Cup football).

The decades of socio-cultural infiltration has left Sarawakians obsessed to the extent of forgetting their own heritage.

Sarawakians are also socially dependent on Malaya, especially in areas of administration, education, health and politics.

This cannot be avoided as Sarawak is still lacking in these areas. But this does not mean it should continue to be fully dependent on Malaya.

On the political front too, local parties suffer from ‘bad press’. They too are portrayed as ‘weak and incapable’ against politically well packaged Malayan-based DAP, PKR and PAS.

The ruling Sarawak Barisan Nasional although comprising ‘local’ parties – PBB, PBRS, SPDP and SUPP – are also seen as ‘heavily influenced’ by their Malayan ‘master’ Umno, despite their occasional muscle flexing.

And on a very personal level, many Sarawakians have Malayan spouses. They fear that if Sarawak secedes from Malaysia, complications will arise over their spouses’ citizenship.

Cutting the apron strings
To be economically independent, Sarawakians must start buying local goods to support and assist the growth of the local industries.

Those currently working in or with Malayan entities should consider these entities as ‘foreign’ and preferably return home and work in Sarawak when the opportunity presents itself.

It is time for the people, especially the younger generation, to make an educated choice if they want to be part of this big change. An independent Sarawak will be a big change.

The younger generation must be proud of their own culture, their own roots and their own country. They must strive to know more about their country and look at the bigger picture.

They must make the changes needed for their own future and for the greater good of Sarawak.

The change does not have to be immediate, it can be made at their own time and pace.

But this change must be a conscious effort if Sarawakians want freedom and total independence.