Pages

Powered By Blogger

Monday, 16 September 2013

横竖看发展



横竖看发展17/9/2013  
        砂沙两州参加联邦政府到16/9/2013 50年。  直线看发展从16/9/1963 到今天17/9/2013 发展,是有的。  如果不看quality, 只看quantity是有蜗牛/乌龟爬动的进展。 但是,有多少到位只有人民的实况经验才是真的。  大官爷们血淋淋大口大嘴说呀说,只是说呀说不着边沿好听的话,自己说自己爽而已
        就从道路来讲,砂沙两州的马路状况如何,只有使用者最清楚。 连贯性如何只有人民和天知道。  还有医药,教育,就业机会,危机处理。。。。。。等等quality 如何?  大官们对事实的认知太欠缺了。 只懂得开口讲了一堆不实的废话。 
        Najib 说砂沙两州参加联邦政府享有各种发展好处。  依我看还是联邦政府有这两个州属获益无限。 中央集权和严重 3428 使发展很困难。 任何拨款从首相署上游就收10%/更多commission.  就这样很合法明里偷暗里抢。  盗呀盗;盗到发展地,所剩无几来发展。 50 年蜗牛/乌龟爬动是有quantity的累计。
     亏他说的出口。  也不怕很多人用那根[1字号食指]往脸刮呀刮 问你:[耻不耻?]   沙巴天然资源那么丰富会沦落到今天最贫穷的一个州属,是谁糟蹋她?  Sarawak天然资源更丰富也落汤到今天这么难堪和难看的局面:第3/4 最贫穷的州属。   大家都见证了这样的结果。 Najib 和其他大官们还有脸来胡言乱语。 
        沙巴的Musa Aman和他朋党是从掠夺和榨取/3428中得了得了天文数量财富。  砂州的Taib Mahmud 和他朋党用同样的手段致富。  Taib Mahmud 做了Chief Minister 32年多成了全马最富有的人。 财富几乎超越Murdoch Rupert 的一半。  这是砂州加入联邦后制造的神话和传奇。 这一切的结果都归因于没有管制好大官爷们的后果:  因此才有3428的结果。
        发展的分配还是西马老大们决定一切。 砂州资源犹如俎上的肉,任人斩割。  这两州就像被联邦殖民。  比被英国殖民更惨。  当年英国统治税收有70%归还州政府。  现在,中央政府能榨取和掠夺多少便多少。  权力越来越集中在中央和首相一个人手中。  那[一字号的食指] 代表的/象征在我眼中就是[天下以aku 为尊;  一切以一个人决定]。  据说,首相署部长职位就占了总部长人数的25% 专为[1字号人]办事。   联邦和沙砂两州这样的赢输关系,早就该结束了。
     Taib Mahmud 和他的朋党自关心个人利益和好处。  没有任何阻止和坚持立场。  今天砂州的难堪和难看的局面,还有多少Sarawakians 可以忍受下去。 Taib Mahmud很喜欢叫人民把希望寄在未来。 20 多年前我见证他说[未来居者会有其屋]。他很爱制造[未来的美景]来安慰阿狗和阿猫。 现在他制造的[未来美景] 是[砂州2030 会成为最先进和最富有的一州]。 他说到时人民每月收入会是RM15,000.  我不知 道他是针对那一行业, 那一群人讲话。 
     RM15,000到时的真直会不会只是现在的RM1,500。像台湾人月入NT20,000,NT30,000,NT50,000 NT100,000,NT...........
     那是17年后的事。 那是如果他还活着应该是77+ 17 = 94 岁了。 如果他还是Chief Minister of Sarawak, 那么他应该是全马和全世界做Chief Minister 做最长久的  32 + 17 = 49。比过Zimbabwe 87岁的Magebe。
     如果 一切的进展还是这样的。  阿狗还是阿狗;阿猫还是阿猫。  那么Chief Minister of Sarawak, 当然还是Taib Mahmud.  Fatimah 陈赛明说他是“glue factor”.  这肯定是glue 到那一天了。  只有天知道是那一天。   
    我希望2016 会有分晓的。  2006州选人民开始看到民主的神圣和3428;2011州选 我看到民主的进展,2016 我希望会是霸权的结束和总结。 民主在砂州诞生。 新的局面,新的希望和展望。  
        横看发展看全国各州也看各国的进展,走,去看Singapore, Hongkong,  
South
Koreo,  Taiwan, Australia,  Finland, Norway…………………我国各领域的发展如何????   点到为止。 我不喜欢重复再重复同样的东西/大家都很清楚的东西。 

Sunday, 15 September 2013

Too many subjects can kill



Too many subjects can kill   16/9/2013
        Why do our children need to study so many subjects?  Go to Finland, Norway, Demark, Switerzland and Sweden to find out how many subjects their pupils in the Primary Schools study and how frequently they have the tests and examinations in a year?    It is definitely unwise to “stuff” our pupils with so many things without thinking that whether they can “digest” or not.    It is the fact /truth we witness in Malaysia.
        Almost all our pupils/ students studying in school in morning/afternoon session go to the tuition school in the afternoon /evening session to practice exam-oriented exercises.    How many % of our Chinese students are trapped up in this “vicious cycle” in the mad-rat race for nothing much but the good results.   How many % of the students who can attain the requirements to get scholarships to study overseas or get admitted to the few national universities in the country?
The rest, well, if they still want to go for higher education.  Yes, we have  plenty of private universities around with PTPTN loan ever ready for them to apply.  Hee……………………………….  This is the education pattern and practice in our country.  Those Malaysians who have migrated to Australia/ elsewhere mainly because of the good quality of education there.
        My second younter sister / S2 and her husband have 2 children and they both go the school there.  They don’t have tuition at all.   They follow the lessons and do some exercises in school and maybe study an hour or two at home.  That’s it.  He finished his Year 12 last year and enrolled to a national university in Melbourne doing the Computer programming course this year.  
        Why do we study so many subjects when they serve little purposes in their life?   The Moral subject can be incorportated in the languages.  Learning the moral values through stories is much much more effective and impressive.    Why not just study 3 languages, Science and Mathematics for primary school pupils and let them have plenty of time to do reading.  Allocate at least an hour or so a day for extensive reading graded /geared to their levels  in different languages to get reinforcement for their intensive learning.  
        For languages, especially, they are for practising, not to teach all the time to learn.    Yes, just spare 10 minutes to teach a grammatical item or 2 a time and some touches on phonics for primary and phonetics for secondary.   For the rest of the period(s), let them practise orally and in written form.   These languages are learnt as a second language and so some teaching of the rules and regulations is necessary.   Who taught you to speak mother tongue?  
        For secondary school, limit the subjects to 9 like my School Certificate that I got in 1977 and the “subjects graded 6 or better 5”.   Encourage reading at all cost to make up for insufficiency of learning in school.   Reading good and inspiring books would provide a strong mental base for a person to face the downs in life in time of emergency.  
        Exam-oriented education is fragmented learning and also too shallow.   There is little meaning and it can be really boring and frustrating.    It is because the learning is not based on a well-organised solid foundation and prior knowledge as well as going in a progressive manner.   Am I right?
        Going to school and for tuition have left our students little time for themselves to do reading and other activities at all.    The exam-oriented examination is just like taking capsulated tablets for vitamins, minerals and other nutrients instead of eating vegetables, fruits, chicken, fish and the like to enjoy for the required food nutrients for health.  
        Having knowledge in depth and width fosters creativity and innovation.    Studying so many subjects in so exam-oriented ways kills all the ingenuity of a person.    It is time to change for the good of the  development of a person as a whole.  

Saturday, 14 September 2013

准备好提控教育部



准备好提控教育部   15/9/2013
        教育部官爷们是聘请来办好事情。 没有把事情办好的照理当然要把那些没有能力的官爷们通通解聘。  这是天经地义的事。  肯定全世界 都会认同的事。 
        华小学欠缺400多个老师。  现在我们有460位大学毕业生又 经过师训18个月在家苦苦等教育部分配去学校任教。  可是,我的教育部就是没有采取任何行动。  Mary Yap, Deputy Education Minister, 还好意思叫这些受过师训的大学生们先去找别的工作。  这是很不负责任的话。 我想全国关心教育的国人都在问[为什么不分派这460 位去填补空缺呢?这到底怎么一回事啊] 
Muhyiddin Yassin and Mary Yap 教育部的领头羊应该站出来给大家好好地解释一番。  不然, 我认为董//教总有必要上诉。  如果国内始终没有方法解决,为什么不向United Nations 伸冤。 56年拉拉扯扯的事应该有个了断。  软的是绝对不行的。  该是时候用硬的坚持自己的立场。  United Nations 来主持公道。 强迫Muhyiddin Yassin and Mary Yap 还有那些不会办事的官爷们走路。 
        哼。。。。我们中学还缺300 位合格华文老师。  教育部在做什么????  我们为什么要花钱养一群不做事的官爷????
        教育办的如此下场都是因为我们有关领袖们太得过且过。   教育是建国之本也是全民的共同资产。  这是要全民的共同努力。 我们不要再忍受官爷们用我们人民的税金撒野和胡乱非为。 是时候我们人民一起来整顿教育部了