Liew
says re-tabling of amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal
Constitution reopens door for Sarawak, Sabah to regain rights
KUCHING:
Sarawak and Sabah will have a second chance at having their status
as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia restored during the
Parliament si ing early next year.
Minister in the Prime
Minister’s Department Datuk Liew Vui Keong announced yesterday
that the proposed amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal
Constitution would be re-tabled in the Dewan Rakyat in March, a
Bernama report said.
The de-facto law
minister said this was agreed between Prime Minister Tun Dr
Mahathir Mohamad, Sabah Chief Minister Datuk Seri Mohd Shafie Apdal
and Sarawak Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari Tun Openg
during a meeting at the Prime Minister’s office on Tuesday.
“I call on all members of Parliament to give bipartisan support to the amendment as it is important with regard to the position of Sabah and Sarawak in the Federation, and the ma er is close to the heart of every Sabahan and Sarawakian,” Liew said.
Liew pointed out that the main agenda of the meeting on Tuesday was the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and that it had helped in reaching a consensus on the remaining four of 21 main issues identified by the Special Cabinet Commi ee to Review the implementation MA63.
“I call on all members of Parliament to give bipartisan support to the amendment as it is important with regard to the position of Sabah and Sarawak in the Federation, and the ma er is close to the heart of every Sabahan and Sarawakian,” Liew said.
Liew pointed out that the main agenda of the meeting on Tuesday was the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) and that it had helped in reaching a consensus on the remaining four of 21 main issues identified by the Special Cabinet Commi ee to Review the implementation MA63.
The
proposed amendment to Article 1(2) of the Federal Constitution
was tabled at the Dewan Rakyat in April this year by Dr Mahathir.
It sought to restore the status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia, but the content and wording of the amendment bill were disputed in Parliament.
It then failed to secure the required number of votes to be passed in Parliament as
Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS), Barisan Nasional (BN) and Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) MPs had abstained from voting.
GPS was slammed by Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders for supposedly failing the people of Sarawak a er the proposed amendment was dropped.
It sought to restore the status of Sabah and Sarawak as equal partners with Peninsular Malaysia, but the content and wording of the amendment bill were disputed in Parliament.
It then failed to secure the required number of votes to be passed in Parliament as
Gabungan Parti Sarawak (GPS), Barisan Nasional (BN) and Parti Islam SeMalaysia (PAS) MPs had abstained from voting.
GPS was slammed by Pakatan Harapan (PH) leaders for supposedly failing the people of Sarawak a er the proposed amendment was dropped.
Liew
himself had reportedly claimed that Sabah and Sarawak had lost a ‘
golden opportunity’ to regain their position as equal partners in
Malaysia.
However,
Abang Johari would explain later that the Cabinet Commitee meeting
on the MA63 never discussed the actual contents and wordings of the
amendment with the state government.
He added that any decision made on such an important matter would require him to obtain the mandate of the Consultative Commitee established by the Sarawak State Legislative Assembly.
Abang Johari stressed that any amendment to the federal constitution or any law that sought to restore the rights of Sarawak as intended by the parties to the Malaysia Agreement must be substantive in nature and not merely in form.
He added that any decision made on such an important matter would require him to obtain the mandate of the Consultative Commitee established by the Sarawak State Legislative Assembly.
Abang Johari stressed that any amendment to the federal constitution or any law that sought to restore the rights of Sarawak as intended by the parties to the Malaysia Agreement must be substantive in nature and not merely in form.
He had felt that the proposed amendment on Article 1 (2)
alone did not fully address the aspiration of the people of
Sarawak and a reference to MA63 should also be made via an amendment
to the Federal Constitution.
I call on
all members of Parliament to give bipartisan support to the
amendment as it is important with regard to the position of Sabah
and Sarawak in the Federation.
Datuk Liew Vui Keong
The Borneo Post
18 Dec 2019
My comments:
MA63 is a fraud from the very beginning. It is said that 600 amendments have been done on it. It has been so mutilated beyond recognition to talk about amendments. It is ridiculous to talk about amendment on the mutilated MA63 with the Malaya government. Abang Johari and Shafie Apdal should stop making fools of themselves. Sarawakians and Sabahans are really angry over their folly behaviours. To settle MA63, they should bring it to the International Court of Justice, not among the three in the secret talk. These two idiots are only concerned about their self-interests. Only traitors are eager for amendments with Mahathir. Only traitors think that amend one article to correct all the 600 amendments done on MA63.
No comments:
Post a Comment