Pages

Powered By Blogger

Sunday, 9 August 2020

海盗旗 10/8/2020

 

海盗旗  10/8/2020

海盗旗在砂国还能 飘扬多久?  取决于砂国人的决心去除马来亚海盗国继续殖民砂国。砂人应该好好利用自己手中的自决权来驱走马来亚政党,然后消灭卖国贼政党。 支持肯民党追寻独立让该党执政,以单方面宣布砂拉越独立并禀告联合国咱们的决定,然后申请成为联合国的会员国。

        又是海盗旗在各政府机构飘扬的季节。我希望私人场所一概拒绝飘扬海盗旗,狠狠的表达我们的厌恶和不屑。 要解决这问题,只有一个方法: 驱赶马来亚政党毫无忌惮的在砂国耍权弄势,撒野,支配我们,处处限制我们的发展。然后再消灭卖国贼政党。 砂兄弟姐妹们,你们准备好了吗?

        砂独立是势在必行,义无反顾的事。

Saturday, 8 August 2020

林冠英保释金RM100万

 

林冠英保释金RM100万     9th August, 2020

DAP林冠英被提控贪污舞弊滥权。RM四百万多的屋价,他可以以RM两百多万获得,这当中的【不寻常的交易】当然是免不了的 但是林冠英始终否认这当中有任何【见不得人的交易】。 会思考的人,那一个会相信,他是无辜的呢?   

对于海底隧道的工程,他是否也像 Mahathir惯例做法要求10%回扣,这是有必要经过法庭的审讯。但是有智能手机的人民都有这方面的咨询了。 DAP执政这么多年下来,槟州土地发展的造成很多秃头山情况,令人堪虑,这些是假的吗? 掠夺性的发展,让很多槟城人无限焦虑,是假的吗? 房地产的发展高档偏一方, 有顾虑到95%人住所问题吗?

        林冠英身价上RM千万,保释金,还要人民承担吗? 人民,你们身价值多少? 抢着去帮这种人有钱人去凑款,是否开自己玩笑呢? 看他当财长时,他那种举高气扬,不可一世的模样,他心中有人民吗?

        马来亚人要怎么做是马来亚人的事。我们砂拉越人千千万万不要那么傻。不要被马来亚人当傻瓜来看和说。我们是一分钱都不可以出。这些马来亚海盗们对砂拉越的思维是一样的:耍权弄势殖民掠夺,剥削,打压,抢劫和霸凌我们砂人。

林冠英509胜选后来我们砂拉越,他目空一切,大胆在我们砂国撒野说我们砂国会破产。GPS政府怎样不好,轮不到他来讲。结果,希盟自己做不到两年的所谓的联邦政府却倒台了。 还有一个马来亚海盗嘴脸,我们砂人要牢牢记住的是陆昭福(Anthony Loke, 当我们要求退还 民都鲁港口时,他不用思考的回应这是属于【联邦的】。这些马来亚来的海盗们是时候被消灭。

        林冠英家财RM千万,一百万保释金要他人承担,这是什么逻辑? 人民,你们身价值多少? 领袖做奸犯科后,人民还要为他承担保释金,大家有没有搞错啊!别盲目的崇拜和宠坏贪污舞弊滥权的领袖。别开自己的玩笑。

 

                                                                                林梅芳     

Wednesday, 5 August 2020

陈芳龙.马新分家,回首55年心酸路

陈芳龙.马新分家,回首55年心酸路


新加坡7月10日完成全国大选,人民行动党继续执政;8月9日将迎来举国欢腾的国庆;而海峡这边的国盟和希盟,却还在为政权的攻防缠斗不休!

回首过去55年两国的政经发展,新加坡人应该感恩国父东姑阿都拉曼,当年将他们逐出大马,之后才有了李光耀的励精图治,开创近代史上新加坡版的“汉唐盛世”,更把新加坡带向世界经济舞台。

历史且从1965年说起,我们把两国放在公平的起跑缐上同步出发。经过了55年的竞争,两国在评估国力的各项指标上,已经天差地远。无论国内生产总值(GDP)、国民年均收入、贫富差距、货币汇率变化、国民幸福指数、人均寿命……大马全部膛乎其后。

当年新加坡一无所有,前途茫然!而大马物产丰饶,前景一片大好,只因为部分领导者的贪污腐败、或者治国无能,55年后,换来今天大马百姓的心酸无奈!

回顾过去,大马历仼首相或政客,多数未将自己当成全民领袖,反而处心积虑的在种族课题上作文章,以捞取政治资本。当年李光耀被迫离开大马,最主要的原因正是反对“马来人享有特殊高等待遇”。时至今日,这个课题我们全然接受。

离开大马后,李光耀在新加坡的发展历程上,仿效唐朝李世民“蕃汉兼容”的种族政策,公平对待所有族群,努力把经济大饼做大,才有今天“全民均富”的成就,开创现代版的“贞观之治”!

反观大马,当了22+2年的首相马哈迪,早期仼相期间,一手树立了糟糕的“拐杖文化”,养成一部分百姓好逸恶劳的陋习。今天,官员们的贪腐,公务员严重过剩,他和他的继任者都必须负很大的责任。如果这些问题不求反思、检讨、改进,国家奢谈进歩!

6月下旬,敦马接受香港《亚洲时报》访问时表示,大马各族之间贫富差距问题严重,并自认这是两度任相的最大遗憾。这一番话,正也反映了他的治国能力。漫长的20多年,李光耀有足够的时间,把一穷二白的新加坡,引领到国际舞台!而他?还在谈华人和马来人的财富分配,一个70年代的守旧思维,怎么有能力引领国家迎向高度竞争的21世纪?

55年前“分家之后”,马新两国从公平的起跑点开跑,今天双方出现了多大落差?我们且用几个重要数据作比较!

其一、“国内生产总值”(GDP)是用来衡量一国经济实力的重要指标。去年大马GDP 3586亿美元,为1965年29.6亿美元的121倍。而新加坡在退出大马时,GDP只有9.75亿美元,至去年达到3622亿美元,成长371倍。

1965年大马的GDP是新加坡的3倍,到了2019年新马两国GDP持平,别忘了目前大马人口3270万人,是新加坡的5.3倍。

敦马仼相22年间,GDP成长4.4倍;而李光耀在25年的总理任内,GDP成长37倍。这段期间正逢全球经济起飞,两国GDP的此消彼长,决定了“国与国之间的贫富差距”。

其二、“国民年均收入”(PCI)是用来衡量人民生活水平和富裕程度的指标,这一数据,大马落后的更远。根据CEIC资料,去年新加坡国民年均所得达到6万5233美元,世界排名第8。而大马同年的国民年均所得为1万1197美元,两国人民的平均年所得差了5.83倍。1965年,新加坡国民年均所得516美元,54年间足足增加了126倍,反观大马,同年为310美元,54年间只成长36倍。

1965年,两地国民年均收入相去不远!但2019年大马的国民年均收入,却还不及新加坡1990年1万1850美元的水平,足足落后新加坡30年!我们要如何追赶?这真的是“夸父追日”,越追越远!

其三、“基尼系数”(Gini coefficient )是用来衡量国民在当年收入的贫富差距,根据联合国2018年公布的数据,新加坡基尼系数为0.398,是近20年来贫富差距最接近的,全民处于均富状态;而大马的基尼系数0.428,贫富差距也不显著。可见,敦马经常挂在嘴边的“华人富有,贫富差距”的立论不完全成立!

其四、“强势货币”的成因很多,包括国际收支、国民收入、通货膨胀、货币供给、国家财政收支等因素,自90年代起新币成了国际强势货币。目前新币对令吉兑换率来到1:3.07。强势货币不利出口,会削弱出口商品竞争力;但有利进口,百姓可以购买廉价的进口货。

但新币并未因货币强势而影响国际竞争力,反倒是令吉低迷,百物上涨,苦了大马百姓。别忘了,1965年,新币和令吉的兑换率是1:1。

其五、“国民幸福指数”(GNH)是衡量一国人民的幸福感,包含多项评估指标,联合国今年4月公布的《世界幸福指数报告》,新加坡人的幸福程度亚洲排名第2,世界第31。而大马排名82(2020年),且排名逐年大幅下降,分别是80名(2019年)、35名(2018年)、42名(2017年),如此看来,改朝换代并未为人民带来幸福!连邻国菲律宾(52名)、泰国(54名)都比大马人(82名)幸福!

其六、“人均寿命”是衡量一国医疗水平的指标。如果不比较谁幸福?谁有钱?那么就比较谁长命吧!去年世界卫生组织公布全球“人均寿命”,新加坡排名世界第3,人均寿命83.1岁,比大马人的75岁,足足长寿8.1岁,连越南、泰国、斯里兰卡都比大马人长命!和新加坡比?又是哪一位“岁月神偷”偷走了我们的8.1年?

其七、“国土面积”,1965年新加坡国土面积582平方公里,增加到目前的725平方公里,土地面积增加143平方公里,这是50年来“精卫填海”的毅力创造的世界之最。今天,新加坡每平方公里人口达到8500人,但良好的城市规划,并不会觉得居住环境太拥挤;反观吉隆坡,庞大建筑群的周边道路,最多是两线道,我们的都巿规划出了严重问题!

其八、“全球最具竞争力经济体”,这是瑞士洛桑管理学院(IMD)6月发布的硏究报告,新加坡连续两年排名第一,连美国都膛乎其后,大马落后的更远。新加坡之所以取得佳绩,在于高效的国际贸易和投资、金融体系、优质的教育制度和人才资源资、健全的科技基础设施,包括电信、互联网及高科技产业发展等,都发挥了重要作用。

最后,说说两国未来的前途,当我们还几十年不变的靠石油和原产品作为主要外汇收入,新加坡则已经攀登到另一个峰顶。

时至今日,新加坡在金融和外汇交易领域、炼油和交易中心、钻油平台制造和船舶修复、港口呑吐量等,都排名世界前3。就算是大学学府的水平,QS公布的2020年大学排名,新加坡国立大学和南洋理工大学同列世界第11,皆为亚洲第1。

两两比较,为什么国土比我们小457倍、人口不到我们19%的新加坡,今天能有如此辉煌成就?“答案”就交给那些成天抢着当首相、在国会耍嘴皮的大官们去思索吧!

Wednesday, 29 July 2020

MA63: No need to make final report public - Borneo Post Online

theborneopost.com

MA63: No need to make final report public - Borneo Post Online

KUALA LUMPUR: The government maintains its stand not to make the final report from the Cabinet special committee to review the implementation of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63), available to the public.

Deputy Minister in the Prime Minister’s Department (Sabah and Sarawak affairs) Datuk Hanifah Hajar Taib said this was because the document has been classified as official secret under the Official Secrets Act 1972.

“For the moment, the government maintains its stands that there is no need for the final report to be distributed to the public as the content is technical in nature and involves sensitive matters.

“As such, the status of the document remains as official secret and is to be treated as such as provided by the law,” she said.

She said this in her reply to a question from Chan Foong Hin (PH-Kota Kinabalu) on the status of the final report from the Cabinet special committee to review the implementation of MA63 during a special chamber session at the Dewan Rakyat yesterday.

Chan also asked about the status of 21 matters tabled in the report including four issues that are still being discussed, namely oil royalty and petroleum cash payments; oil minerals and oil fields; Territorial Sea Act 2012 [Act 750]; and state rights over the continental shelf.

Hanifah Hajar said discussions on the four matters are still ongoing and a special council would also be set up soon for that purpose.

“A joint committee consisting of members from the federal and state governments has also been set up to discuss issues on oil and gas. The committee is co-chaired by the Senior Minister (Datuk Seri Fadillah Yusof, who is also Works Minister) and the Finance Minister (Tengku Datuk Seri Zafrul Tengku Abdul Aziz) and MOF secretariat,” she said.

In December last year, former deputy minister in the Prime Minister’s Department Mohamed Hanipa Maidin told the Dewan Negara that 17 out of 21 matters tabled by the Sarawak and Sabah governments at the Cabinet special committee meeting to review the implementation of MA63 had been jointly approved. — Bernama


Mycomments:

MA63 is null and void from its very beginning as far as I know about the Chagos Island which was settled in the International Court of Justice to be null and was returned to Mauritius accordingly.  Sarawak and Sabah had no legal capacity to sign the international treaty, either.  I am wondering what the so-called federal government and Sarawak government want to make it so secretive and sensitive.  How it was formulated and done has become an open secret to the Sarawakians and Sabahans who are concerned about the status of our nations, Sabah and Sarawak.  Our self-determination can decide what we want Sarawak to stand as a nationa or as a colonised state to the Malayan government.

 

Saturday, 25 July 2020

Lee: Appreciate real meaning of Sarawak Day


Lee: Appreciate real meaning of Sarawak Day
The Borneo Post
23 Jul 2020
Lee (right) raises the Sarawak flag at the function, while Goh (third right) and others look on.
MIRI: Gaining independence is not easy without struggles and sacrifices, says Minister of Transport Datuk Lee Kim Shin.
As such, Sarawakians must understand and appreciate the real meaning of Sarawak Day which is celebrated annually on July 22, he added.
“Do not let extreme ideology penetrate into Sarawak and destroy the prevailing unity. It is not easy to achieve independence and have peace without having to use a weapon,” he said at a flag-raising ceremony organised by the Federation of Miri Division Chinese Associations in conjunction with Sarawak Day yesterday.
Lee, who is also Senadin assemblyman, said July 22 is very significant to Sarawak because it was the day it achieved its independence in 1963.
“Sarawak Day was gazetted as a public holiday in 2016 when the late Tok Nan ( Pehin Sri Adenan Satem) was the chief minister.
“This is a historical day for Sarawak because it was the day we formed our first government, led by then chief minister Datuk Stephen Kalong Ningkan.
“Therefore, all buildings, government departments and private premises are encouraged to fly the Sarawak flag to commemorate the occasion and to promote the love for Sarawak which is made up of people of various races and religions
Lee also said the Sarawak government would continue to fight for Sarawak’s rights that are contained in the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). President of Federation of Miri Division Chinese Associations, Datuk David Goh, who also spoke at the function, said Sarawak Day was important as it is proof that Sarawak was a sovereign nation before it helped form Malaysia, together with Malaya, Singapore and North Borneo (Sabah) in 1963.
“It also proves that we Sarawakians can live in peace and harmony although we are made up of various races, religions and culture.
“We, the federation also fully support Chief Minister Datuk Patinggi Abang Johari’s leadership. We also hope that we can regain all our rights and autonomy as stated in MA63,” he said.

My comments:  
It is misleading of Minister of Transport Datuk Lee Kim Shin to say that Sarawak seeking for independence will result in bloodshed.  It is really irresponsible of him saying this.  Sarawak is not a territory of Malaya, not to say MA63 is void and null.   Sarawakians are vested with intrinsic rights of self-determination to seek for Sarawak independence and freedom.  Those playing blind and rejecting the rights of Sarawak to become an independent country are the ones holding official positions with very good salary.  They are so selfish and self-interested to care about the whole being of Sarawak.     
        Fortunately, more and more Sarawakians stand for Sarawak independence and freedom.  Ministers like Lee Kim Shin should be prepared to pack and go for good.  I really feel ashamed of him.