彭女士求医历险记

彭女士求医历险记 27/5/2024

今年2月1日早晨，彭女士在自家的园地采野菜时，不小心跌倒。跌断了左手腕。马上采取的行动就是去离自家不远的大医院。进了紧诊部。 专科医生X-ray检查，上石膏从手臂到手指两节，只露出手指头，然后回家。

2月15日复诊，X-ray检查，一样，没有任何进展。查完，回家。

2月29日复诊，X-ray检查。彭女士整个被石膏包裹从手臂到两节的手指，经过大概28天石膏包裹，在通风不良下，皮肤已经瘙痒到不行。于是，要求医生，拆开。当时，她的皮肤看起来是皱皱的。

之后，医生吩咐从新打上石膏，然后回家休养。

3月14日复诊，X-ray，还是一样没进展。医生吩咐可以拆掉石膏。那时，她的弯头elbow,不能伸直而她的手腕完全失去灵活性。

医生提醒她多注重营养，告诉她以她62岁年龄，所以，是这样子的状况。吩咐她16/4回来复诊。

回到家后，彭女士总觉得医生有误诊。看到她的弯头elbow 有不正常的突出；手腕连上下的动作都无法做。她警觉事态严重。

于是，第二天15/3, 当天晚上11点半，独自就坐巴士前往古晋求医去。 到古晋时是16/3天亮了。她姐姐和表妹就到巴士站接她。

9点多就去见会接骨的中医师：断裂的接回，脱臼的按回，只背着绷带，就轻松回姐姐家休息。

三天后19/3复诊, 当天，她又坐巴士回诗巫。

现在，她在调养中，应该需要至少一年半载的时间才会完全复原吧！

Kuching High Court dismissed

Kuching High Court dismisses pro-independence activists’ suit challenging validity of Malaysia Agreement 1963

Kuching High Court dismisses pro-independence activists’ suit challenging validity of Malaysia Agreement 1963

Civil Society Court Cases Malaysia Politics

Yee LoonBy Yee Loon 29 May 2023

 0 144 2 minutes 

SARAWAK, MALAYSIA— Last Thursday (25 May), Kuching High Court dismissed a suit brought by 11 Sarawakians challenging the validity of the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). The agreement led to the formation of Malaysia in 1963, incorporating Sabah and Sarawak.

Judicial Commissioner Alexander Siew How Wai, in his decision, stated that the suit lacked a reasonable cause of action and was misconceived.

According to Siew, the Federal Constitution (FC) is the supreme law of the nation, and it states that Sabah and Sarawak are part of Malaysia.

Judge reiterated the necessary of two-third majority constitutional amendments in Malaysian Parliament.

“Sabah and Sarawak cannot be not part of Malaysia without the necessary amendments to the constitution, which would require a two-third majority of Parliament and the consent of Sabah and Sarawak.”

“This court cannot disregard or rewrite the FC as this court could be guilty of doing, if this court were to grant the declarations sought in this suit. ”

“In the humble view of this court, after due consideration, this suit is obviously unsustainable. The application to strike out the suit under Order 18 of the Rules of Court is allowed,” the Judge Siew added.

Additionally, the judge ordered the plaintiffs to pay RM10,000 (approximately 2,156 USD) in costs.

The suit was initially filed in March 2022 by Dorus Katan and 11 other Sarawakians, naming the Malaysian, Sarawak, and UK governments as respondents.

The 11 Sarawakians involved in the suit are: Dorus Katan Juman, Hugh Lawrence Zehnder, Nor Nyawai, Xavier Ginafah Sidop, Jemain Uji, Belayong Nyandang, Kalai Sibok, Yu Chin Liik, Chieng Kung Chiew, Ahmad Awang Ali, and Alim Giovanni Adlim.

The plaintiffs sought a declaration that the MA63 was not a binding international agreement since it failed to comply with the requirements of international law for the making of treaties, which state that only sovereign states can enter into binding agreements.

They also sought a declaration that the UK government’s decolonization of Sarawak and Sabah in 1963, by transferring the two colonies to the Malayan Federation (renamed Malaysia), did not lawfully fulfill the right of people to exercise self-determination, as mandated by UN General Assembly Resolutions (UNGAR) 1514XV & 1541XV and international law principles.

They argued that the decolonization process should have involved seeking the consent of the people through a referendum and addressing the Philippines’ claim on a part of Sabah in accordance with UNGAR 1541.

This, they claimed, required the UK and Malaya to seek the consent of the people in compliance with UNGAR 1541 to hold a referendum before establishing the proposed federation and resolution of the Philippines’ claim on a part of Sabah.

Plaintiffs claimed the integration of North Borneo and Sarawak into the Malayan federation was “wrongful and unlawful”

Furthermore, they sought a declaration that the integration of North Borneo and Sarawak into the Malayan Federation was wrongful and unlawful due to breaches of international law.

They claimed that the Malaysian government’s continued control over the sovereignty of the two states and their territories is unlawful, and thus, the territories should be decolonized for independence.

Alternatively, they sought a declaration that if the MA63 was validly made in accordance with international law, it was terminated by the federal government of Malaysia’s multiple willful breaches of the agreement, acknowledged by the federal and state governments.

They argued that the neglect and failure to faithfully comply with the treaty constituted a “willful discontinuance” of the treaty over the course of five decades.

How to exit from the federation of Malaysia

*How to exit from the federation of Malaysia?*

Malaysia is not a country. It is according to the federal constitution, a federation created by the federation of Malaya, Singapore Sabah and Sarawak on 16 September 1963. Singapore Sarawak and Sabah did not helped form nor joined Malaysia but were acquired by Malaya under the void Malaysia Agreement 1963(MA63) to enlarge Malaya effective 16 September 1963. Malaya then told the United Nations Secretariat through Dato Ong Yoke Lin that Malaya took a new name, Malaysia. This means, Malaysia is Malaya and Malaya is Malaysia. 

Malaya wanted Sabah, Sarawak and Brunei badly because these Borneo territories of the British were rich in oil and gas and also has huge land mass in Borneo.

 Malaya's economy was going downhill at that time because of declining tin mining activities and was nearly bankrupt and Tunku had to borrow money from Brunei.

 Tunku foresee Malaya can one day be over populated and need Borneo territories for Malayans to migrate.

Singapore sought independence from UK before Malaysia was created, but UK didn't grant Singapore independence. David Marshall resigned as Chief Minister when his mission which included Lee Kuan Yew, to seek Singapore independence failed. Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) then took over the government and knowing UK wanted Malaysia formed, came to Sabah and Sarawak to campaign for the formation of Malaysia.

After Malaysia was created, LKY then unknown to all until today of his motive, then, use his Malaysian Malaysia Vision, irked Tunku Abdul Rahman. By this,LKY forced Malaya to sit down to trash the social, economic and political differences Singapore had with Malaya at that time.

TUNKU in fact had never accepted Singapore to be part of Malaysia, then agreed Malaya and Singapore could not be together and both had to part ways.

*How to exit?*

If Sabah and Sarawak want to exit from Malaysia, the strategy is to follow Singapore. Before the Singapore strategy could be adopted, make sure a local political party is put as the government. The high court in Kuching in the MA63 Suit taken by PBK hinted that only the state government can bring issues of independence and illegalities of MA63 to court and plaintiffs in PBK Suit has no locus standi (no standing) to bring the Suit. This means there is a legal right to seek the court to declare MA63 null and void and also to declare Malaysia is not a legally instituted federation or country. If agreed by the court, this means, Malaysia has to dissolve or disintegrate. This also means Sarawak can just declare independence and Malaya cannon insist Sarawak to go back to Malaya.

The PBK govermnent of Sarawak can also seek Malaya to compensate Sarawak for the loss of her oil and gas.

Now if Sarawakians want Sarawak to gain independence , then vote PBK to become the Sarawak government so that PBK as the Sarawak government will have the locus standi to bring 

matters concerning MA63 and to pursue Sarawak independence before legal avenues. 

I have my strategies on how to exit from Malaysia peacefully and by legal means. It will be a peaceful exit.

*Cannot exit because no army, neighbours can attack us?*

Under international law, no country can start war. When Sadam Hussein of Iraq ordered his army to attack Kuwait, United Nations assembled 35-strong nations army led by US and UK to liberate Kuwait in 1991. Sadam Hussein was arrested, tried and sentenced to death by hanging.

There are many countries in the world that don't have armies. This includes Panama, Nauru, Solomon islands and the Vatican.

What we need for maintaining security if independent, is an efficient police force.

*We don't have experts and capable people to run the country?*

Sarawak has many talented people working outside of Sarawak and MALAYSIA. They can be recalled back. We can employ expatriates to come to Sarawak to help build our economy and our systems. We can give them PR or citizenship status. I think many people in the world will come. It's about dollars and cents issue only to get people come back and to get people to help our economy etc.

When Sarawak is independent there will be not more politicking about religion and no politicians can fight for Supremacy of Malay race, chinese race, Dayak races, etc.All will be equal.

There will no more be fighting for Islam as a super religion and no more polticizing or calling non Muslims as kafirs because all will be equal. Christians and Buddhists cannot claim their religion is superior than Islam. All will be equal.

NCR land would be given title but with strict conditions not to fall into the hands of non natives unnecessarily. NCR would be proudly belonged to natives and be properly cultivated with the help of non natives. The land would not be found left idle.

Sarawak will be wealthy and prosperous because we have a business strategy to boost the incomes of all people to capture global market with very small startup capital in which all Sarawakians can participate.

God bless Sarawak 

Voon Lee Shan 

President Parti Bumi Kenyalang 

26 August 2024

Jakim

The below relevant to the above. 👇

A must read article for all responsible Sarawakians. MADANI GOV'T SERIOUS BREACH OF MA63 FUNDAMENTAL SECULAR CONCEPT OF MALAYSIA TERMINATES THE TREATY

SABAH & SARAWAK MAY FREELY EXIT THE FAILED FEDERATION   

Kota Kinabalu: Liberal Democratic Party (LDP) Vice-President David Ong, raised concerns regarding reports officers from the Department of Islamic Development Malaysia (Jakim), will be placed in every government department to ensure decisions align with Islamic principles.

David highlighted the potential implications of such a move on Malaysia’s democracy and constitutional principles.

He also highlighted Malaysia’s diverse population, comprising individuals of various faiths and ethnicities and stressed the importance of upholding the constitutional guarantee of freedom of religion for all. 

He said the reported placement of religious officers in government departments could compromise the secular nature of institutions meant to serve all Malaysians impartially, irrespective of their religious beliefs.

David also stressed the importance of decisions being based on facts and the best interests of all Malaysians, rather than religious considerations.

Of particular concern is the potential for discrimination against non-Muslim citizens and civil servants, as well as the risk of religious considerations overshadowing merit and equality in government operations.

He cautioned against policies that could undermine equal opportunity and non-discrimination, fundamental to a just and harmonious society.

While acknowledging Islam as the religion of the Federation, he reiterated the need for a clear separation between religious affairs and the secular functions of government to safeguard the rights and freedoms of all Malaysians.

Towards this end, he called on the government to clarify the reported policy and urged reconsideration if the reports are accurate.

LDP reaffirmed its commitment to democratic values, diversity and equal treatment for all citizens under the law. 

Ong stressed the importance of upholding Malaysia’s plurality and scrutinising actions that may jeopardize this delicate balance. 

https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/239878/concern-over-placing-jakim-staff-in-every-government-department/

1962 Cobbold Commission in Sarawak

1962年2月的历史录影

MALAYSIA COMMISSION IN SARAWAK AND PROTEST MEETING. (1962)

1962年馬來西亞委員會在砂勞越进行调查面对抗議集会。  

https://www.britishpathe.com/asset/246389/?fbclid=IwY2xjawEhmQRleHRuA2FlbQIxMAABHSMmUM2g33JuBRLk6b57s5xuHuocfh7ccOhln23q5Lb0_zzpa61Aye3n1Q_aem_F4gSQKNL1pUKE61d61wvtQ

Reuters Limited. 

 Background: 

A FIVE-MAN COMMISSION HEADED BY LORD COBBOLD, FORMER GOVERNOR OF THE BANK OF ENGLAND, ARRIVED IN KUCHING, SARAWAK, FEB 19, TO BEGIN A TWO-MONTH ENQUIRY INTO PUBLIC OPINION ON THE PROPOSED MALAYSIAN FEDERATION UNDER WHICH THE BRITISH TERRITORIES OF SARAWAK AND NORTH BORNEO ARE TO BECOME MEMBER STATES ALONG WITH MALAYA AND SINGAPORE. BRITISH PROTECTED BRUNEI IS ALSO CONSIDERED FOR INCLUSION IN MALAYSIA.

（由英格蘭銀行前行長科博爾德勳爵率領的五人委員會於1962年2 月19 日抵達砂拉越古晉，開始對擬議的馬來西亞聯邦计划進行為期兩個月的公眾意見調查，根據該聯邦计划，沙撈越和英屬領土將建立馬來西亞聯邦。 英國保護的汶萊也被考慮納入馬來西亞。）

THE COMMISSION MEMBERS WERE MET AT THE AIRPORT BY THE GOVERNOR OF SARAWAK, SIR ALEXANDER WADDEL, AND CHIEF SECRETARY, MR. F.D. JAKEWAY.

WITH LORD COBBOLD ARE: THE FORMER GOVERNOR OF SARAWAK, SIR ANTHONY ABELL; FORMER CHIEF SECRETARY OF MALAYA; SIR DAVID WATHERSTON; GOVERNOR OF PENANG, DATO WONG POW NEE; AND SECRETARY OF MINISTRY OF FOREIGN AFFAIRS OF MALAYA, MR. MOHAMED GHAZALIE.

THE MEMBERS WILL TOUR NEARLY 3,000 MILES BY LIGHT PLANES, TRAIN, MOTOR BOATS AND DUG-OUT CANOES AMONG THE SCATTERED COMMUNITIES OF DYAK, IBAN, CHINESE AND MALAYS TO GATHER THEIR VIEWS ON MALAYSIA.

ON THE FIRST DAY OF THEIR VISIT TO KUCHING, THEIR STARTING POINT, THE SARAWAK UNITED PEOPLE'S PARTY HELD ONE OF THE BIGGEST MASS RALLIES TO OPPOSE MALAYSIA. NEARLY 7,000 PEOPLE GATHERED AT THE PARTY HEADQUARTERS TO SHOUT "WE WANT INDEPENDENCE". THERE WERE PLENTY OF BANNERS.

（在訪問起點古晉的第一天，砂拉越人民联合黨舉行了最大規模的反對馬來西亞的群眾集會之一。 近7000人聚集在黨總部高喊「我們要獨立」。 有很多橫幅。）

THE RALLY WAS OPENED BY MR. ONG KEE HUI, CHAIRMAN OF THE S.U.P.P. WHO STRESSED THAT IT WAS NOT POSSIBLE TO ACCEPT THE MALAYSIA PLAN BEFORE THE PEOPLE OF SARAWAK WERE ALLOWED TO MANAGE THEIR OWN AFFAIRS. 

（集會由王其辉先生宣布開幕。 王其輝，是砂拉越人民联合黨主席，他強調，在砂拉越人民被允許管理自己的事務之前，不可能接受馬來西亞的計畫。 ）

罗克强：呼吁拉菲兹尊重MA63无危害马联邦团结

罗克强：呼吁拉菲兹尊重MA63 勿危害马来西亚团结 

 https://news.seehua.com/post/1200108

我怎么看爱国

我怎么看：

加强爱国精神 东西马一家人 （诗华日报4/8/24） 

马来亚和婆罗洲两国之间的隔离就像海洋的间隔马半岛和婆罗洲岛，那是永远无法结合成一体的事实。尤其是马来亚一直都是殖民统治沙巴和砂拉越：掠夺，剥削，打压，镇压，抢劫和霸凌。这种算是那一等的家人关系？

831明明白白是马来亚独立日，跟婆罗洲没有半毛钱关系。可是，霸权就是霸权，强硬要咱们砂人庆祝。砂人还是傻人吗？ 搞笑的大事庆祝隔壁家婆婆生日。

看，就是咱们自家的官家一贯的作风，完全接受马霸权的指令作业。不除掉这群人，这无聊无礼无理的要求，永远同在。 

还要大费周章花钱，花时间，花精神体力组合车队从南砂一路驾驶到北砂。大家认为有必要吗？ 

没有以平等伙伴关系公正公平对待砂拉越，还梦想砂人爱马来亚已经更名为马来西亚半岛，还不搞笑吗？

这几年下来， 砂人普遍上都已经知道，马来亚是马来亚人的；砂拉越是砂拉越人的；沙巴是沙巴人是三国联邦不平等伙伴关系（字面上是平等的）。可是马来亚以马来西亚名义殖民统治砂拉越和沙巴。马来亚种种恶性和恶行对砂拉越和沙巴所造成的身心伤害是永远无法弥补的。

今天，马来亚硬要婆罗洲两个殖民地爱马来亚以漂杨这代表马来亚的旗帜，有人道吗？ 角色对换，试试看。如果咱们砂拉越殖民统治马来亚，要你们飘扬砂国旗，你们试探自己有何感想？ 看看，你们是否诅咒这面旗帜为海盗旗？ 将心比心想想。

加强爱马来亚国精神，东西马一家人，别妄想了！ 7824

What I think:

Strengthen the patriotic spirit as a family between Malaya and Borneo States (Seehua Daily 4/8/24)

Nobody can deny the fact that Malaya and two Borneo nations are separated by South China Sea for thousands of miles and can never be united into one. Malaya has about been plundering, exploiting, oppressing, suppressing, looting and bullying us since time immemorial. What on earth is this kind of family?

831 is clearly the Independence Day of Malaya and has nothing to do with Sarawak. How can Malaya expect Sarawakians to celebrate 831? Are Sarawakians still so idiotic? Isn’t it absurd to celebrate the birthday of someone else next door?

Look, this is the consistent style of our own officials, fully accepting Malaya’s instructions for operations. Unless we can get rid of these political thugs, this boring, rude and unreasonable request will always be there. 

Aren’t a lot of money, time, mental and physical energy required to assemble a car convoy to drive all the way from southern Sarawak to the Northern part? Is it necessary? 

Isn’t it funny to induge in the dream of Sarawakians’ patriotism for Malaysia (Malaya in disguise) when Sarawak is treated as a colony ? Or how can you expect patriotism from the colonised people? Ha………………………. 7824

Apa saya fikir:

Mengukuhkan semangat patriotik sebagai sebuah keluarga antara Tanah Melayu dan Negeri2 Borneo (Seehua Daily 4/8/24)

Tiada siapa boleh menafikan hakikat bahawa Tanah Melayu dan dua negara Borneo dipisahkan oleh Laut China Selatan sejauh beribu-ribu batu dan tidak boleh disatukan menjadi satu. Tanah Melayu telah merompak, mengeksploitasi, menindas, menjarah dan membuli kita sejak dahulu lagi. Apa sebenarnya keluarga jenis ini?

831 jelas merupakan Hari Kemerdekaan Tanah Melayu dan tiada kaitan dengan Sarawak. Bagaimanakah Malaya boleh mengharapkan rakyat Sarawak menyambut 831? Adakah orang Sarawak masih bodoh? Bukankah tidak masuk akal untuk meraikan hari jadi orang lain di sebelah?

Lihat, ini adalah gaya konsisten pegawai kita sendiri, menerima sepenuhnya arahan Malaya untuk operasi. Melainkan kita dapat menyingkirkan samseng politik ini, permintaan yang membosankan, kasar dan tidak munasabah ini akan sentiasa ada. 

Tidakkah banyak wang, masa, tenaga mental dan fizikal diperlukan untuk memasang konvoi kereta untuk memandu sepanjang perjalanan dari selatan Sarawak ke bahagian Utara? Adakah perlu? 

Bukankah kelakar untuk menyemai impian patriotisme rakyat Sarawak terhadap Malaysia (Malaya dalam penyamaran) apabila Sarawak dianggap sebagai tanah jajahan? Atau bagaimana anda boleh mengharapkan patriotisme daripada rakyat yang dijajah? Ha………………………. 7824