Pages

Powered By Blogger

Sunday, 30 March 2025

The Darker Side of UMNO

*The Darker Side of UMNO* 
(23/9/2020)

Why are Petronas Accounts Secret ?
Ex-Petronas Boss ( Tengku Razaleigh Petronas Chairman 1981-2011 ) reveals $1.4 trillion handed to UMNO, over 30 years, as long suspected.

Petronas made 90 billion profits a year, for the past 30 years.
 
Tengku Razaleigh revealed that Petronas has given to UMNO a 40 billion a year for the past 30 years, amounting to a mind boggling RM1.2 trillions ( 1200 billions).

What happen to all the money ?

Now you know why politicians and suporters want an all Malay Government , to continue to plunder the country's wealths ( mainly from Sarawak and Sabah ) and remain in power.

 *巫统的阴暗面* 
(2020 年 9 月 20 日)

为什么马来西亚国家石油公司的账目是秘密的?
前马来西亚国家石油公司老板(Tengku Razaleigh)透露,正如人们长期以来所怀疑的那样,30 年来有 1.4 万亿美元被交给了巫统。

过去 30 年,Petronas 每年盈利 900 亿令吉。

Tengku Razaleigh 透露,Petronas 在过去 30 年里每年给巫统 4​​00 亿令吉,总额高达 1.2 万亿令吉(12000 亿令吉)。

这些钱都去哪儿了?

现在你应该会知道为什么政客和他们的支持者想要一个全马来人的政府,方便继续攫掠国家的财富(主要来自砂拉越和沙巴)并继续掌权。

Thursday, 20 March 2025

The dead horse theory

From Mosses P Anap RSNB Ngo

*The Horse Dead Theory in Relation to the Invalidity of MA63*

The Horse Dead Theory is a metaphor that means when something no longer serves its purpose, it is pointless to keep using or trying to fix it. Instead, one should acknowledge its failure and move on. Applying this to the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63) helps illustrate why Sabah and Sarawak should stop relying on it and seek a new path—independence.


1. MA63 is a “Dead Horse” Because It Is No Longer Valid

A horse is considered “dead” when it no longer functions as intended. Similarly, MA63 was supposed to be the legal framework that formed Malaysia, but its legal and political foundation has collapsed over time. Here’s why:

a) MA63 Was Violated Repeatedly
 • The Malaysian government has consistently ignored or broken the terms of MA63.
 • Sabah and Sarawak were promised equal status with Malaya, but they were downgraded to mere states within Malaysia.
 • Autonomy rights, revenue-sharing agreements, and Borneo’s special privileges were gradually eroded by federal laws.
 • If the agreement has not been honored for decades, how can it still be considered valid?

b) The Departure of Singapore in 1965 Rendered MA63 Invalid
 • MA63 was a multilateral agreement between Malaya, Sabah, Sarawak, and Singapore to form Malaysia.
 • When Singapore left in 1965, the structure of Malaysia changed without consulting Sabah and Sarawak.
 • This violated the basic legal principle that any change in a multilateral treaty requires the consent of all parties.
 • If MA63 was altered without agreement, it is no longer legally binding.

c) Malaysia’s Request to Amend MA63 Was Rejected by the British Government
 • Malaysia tried to seek British approval to amend the terms of MA63, but the British government rejected the request.
 • This shows that even the original colonial power does not recognize the legitimacy of Malaysia’s legal claims over Sabah and Sarawak.
 • If even Britain sees the flaws in MA63, why should Sabahans and Sarawakians believe it can still be used?


2. Malaysia Keeps “Whipping the Dead Horse” Instead of Accepting Its Failure

Even though MA63 is legally and politically dead, Malaysian leaders continue to act as if it can be revived. This is like whipping a dead horse, hoping it will move.

a) The False Promise of “Restoring MA63”
 • Malaysian politicians keep saying they will “restore Sabah and Sarawak’s rights” under MA63.
 • But how can you restore something that is already legally dead?
 • They use this as a delay tactic to keep Sabah and Sarawak in Malaysia while making minor changes that do not solve the core problem.

b) The 2021 Constitutional Amendment: A Fake Solution
 • In 2021, Malaysia amended the Federal Constitution to say that Sabah and Sarawak are now “equal partners” again.
 • But this was just symbolic, with no real power, autonomy, or economic independence.
 • This is like trying to feed a dead horse instead of realizing it’s time to dismount.


3. The Logical Step: Stop Relying on MA63 and Move Forward

If a horse is dead, the solution is not to keep riding it, but to find a new horse. Similarly, if MA63 is invalid, the solution is not to keep negotiating under Malaysia—it is to pursue full independence.

a) Independence Is the Only Real Solution
 • Since MA63 has collapsed, there is no longer a legal basis for Sabah and Sarawak to remain in Malaysia.
 • Continuing to fight for “better treatment” within Malaysia keeps Sabah and Sarawak trapped in a system designed to exploit them.
 • Just like a rider must find a new horse, Sabah and Sarawak must find a new political status: independence.

b) Relying on MA63 Will Only Waste More Time
 • If people continue believing in a dead agreement, they will delay real progress.
 • Malaysians will keep offering false promises, but the fundamental problem will never be solved.
 • The sooner Sabah and Sarawak dismount from this “dead horse,” the sooner they can build a better future on their own terms.


Conclusion: Time to Stop Pretending and Take Action
 • MA63 is dead—legally, politically, and practically.
 • Malaysia keeps pretending it’s alive to keep Sabah and Sarawak under its control.
 • Fighting for MA63’s restoration is a waste of time—the only real solution is to leave Malaysia and establish an independent Sabah.
 • The people of Sabah and Sarawak must recognize this reality and move forward boldly.

Tuesday, 18 March 2025

砂拉越的石油和天然气权利:安华应使用 PDA 下的绝对权力纠正不平衡,因为 1958 年石油开采法令仍然有效,国会议员告诉国会

 

砂拉越的石油和天然气权利:安华应使用 PDA 下的绝对权力纠正不平衡,因为 1958 年石油开采法令仍然有效,国会议员告诉国会

为了将掠食者赶走,我们需要枪支和围栏。为了要求政治海盗不要侵犯我们的自然资源,我们需要执行法律并在法庭上起诉他们。

你认为安华会使用 PDA 下的绝对权力来纠正砂拉越石油和天然气 (O&G) 权利的不平衡吗?

正义是 PKR 的标志。他是否愿意为了自己、党和联邦的利益坚持这一原则并进行纠正?

毫无疑问,砂拉越的马来西亚前石油开采法令 (OMO) 1958 年仍然有效且适用。

安华是否愿意使用 PDA 下的绝对权力来纠正不平衡现象并不在我们的控制范围内。

最重要的是,砂拉越 GPS 政府拥有绝对权力在法庭上起诉马来西亚国家石油公司,指控其拒绝遵守砂拉越法律,因为没有任何联邦法律可以取代 MA63 中规定的条款。

无疑问,砂拉越的石油和天然气活动是邦权利,而马来西亚国家石油公司(Petronas@Malaya)应该面对现实,遵守砂拉越法律,否则就退出,因为PDA永远无法推翻MA63

PDA 1974是在EO 1969时,在未经砂拉越议会同意下在砂拉越执行。

大多数砂拉越人和沙巴人都知道,2011年废除EO 1969导致PDA 1974在沙砂自动作废。

让法庭主持砂拉越宪法权力在天然气分配方面的法律基础。要求殖民主义思想的联邦海盗公平正义是毫无意义的。国会议员,成熟一点!

这些殖民者从不相信双赢的共同繁荣。

砂拉越人无法再容忍马来西亚天然气分配不平衡,砂拉越每天生产的天然气总量为45亿标准立方英尺,其中94%由马来西亚国家石油公司出口到国外,而只有60亿标准立方英尺用于砂拉越的能源、工业和家用

产量为45亿X 365=每年16,425亿标准立方英尺。但砂拉越每年只能获得60亿标准立方英尺。

根据威利, 马来亚每天生产的20亿标准立方英尺天然气全部在马半岛使用。

根据1974PDA61)和(3)条,从事天然气营销和分销的企业必须获得总理的批准,但这砂拉越不必要。

2019年的豁免令(修订)通知确认,管理砂拉越天然气分配的法律是DGO,而不是PDA 19/3/25

S’wak’s O&G rights: Anwar should use absolute powers under PDA to correct imbalances as OMO 1958 still valid, MP tells Parliament

 

Facts and Truths

My comments on:

S’wak’s O&G rights: Anwar should use absolute powers under PDA to correct imbalances as OMO 1958 still valid, MP tells Parliament

To keep away the predators from the forest, we need guns and fences.  To demand the political pirates’ hands off our natural resources, we need to enforce laws and sue them in court.

Does anybody think that Anwar would use his absolute powers in terms of control and direction under PDA to correct imbalances in regard to Sarawak’s on oil and gas (O&G) rights? 

Justice is the hallmark of PKR.  Does he care to uphold this principle for the good of himself, the party and the Federation to do this correction?

That Sarawak’s pre-Malaysia Oil Mining Ordinance (OMO) 1958 is still valid and applicable is beyond any doubt.

Whether Anwar cares to use his absolute powers under PDA to correct imbalances is not within our control.

What matters most is the Sarawak GPS government having the absolute power to sue Petronas in courts for refusing to comply to the laws in Sarawak as no federal laws can supercede the clauses as stated in MA63 (List 2 – State List 2(c) Vs List 1 – Federal List 8(j)).  

List 2 – State List

2(c) Permits and licenses for prospecting for mines, mining leases   

       and certifications;

List 1 – Federal List

8(j) Subject to items (2)(c) in the State List: Development of mineral resources, mines, mining, minerals and mineral ores; oils and oilfields; purchase, sale, import and export of minerals and mineral ores; petroleum products; regulations of labour and safety in mines and oilfields;

It is no doubt that O&G activities in Sarawak are state rights and Petronas,@ Malaya, well, should face the reality to comply to the Sarawak laws or get out as PDA can never override MA63.

PDA 1974 was implemented while the EO 1969 was still in force, validating it in Sarawak without being formally adopted.

Most Sarawakians and Sabahans know that  the repeal of the EO 1969 in 2011 led to the auto annulment of the PDA 1974 in SS.

Let the court presides the legal basis of Sarawak constitutional authority in regard to gas distribution.  It is pointless to ask colonial-minded federal pirates for fairness and justice.  Be more mature, MP!

These colonialists have never believed in the win-win situation for mutual prosperity.

No Sarawakians can tolerate the imbalance gas distribution in Malaysia with “94% of the total 4.5 billion standard cubic feet per day of natural gas production in Sarawak is exported abroad by Petronas while only six billion standard cubic feet is used for the energy, industrial, and domestic sectors in Sarawak”.


The amount produces is 4.5 billion X 365 days = 1,642.5 billion standard cubic feet a year.  But Sarawak only gets 6 billion standard cubic feet per year.

According to Willie Malaya produces the two billion standard cubic feet per day of natural gas which is entirely for domestic use.

Based on Sections 6 (1) and (3) of PDA 1974, requiring businesses engaged in gas marketing and distribution to obtain approval from the Prime Minister, but it is not applicable to Sarawak.

An Exemption Order (Amendment) Notification in 2019 confirms that the law governing gas distribution in Sarawak is the DGO, not the PDA.    (19/3/25)

Thursday, 13 March 2025

国会议员待遇丰厚

首相办公厅力证 国会议员待遇丰厚
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1EFVUQAxBG/ #

(吉隆坡12日讯)首相办公厅公布国会议员所享有的福利津贴,以驳斥反对党议员指他们收入太低,无法维持开销而陷入潦倒的指控。

首相办公厅周二发表文告力证,每名国会议员除了享有每月2万5700令吉固定津贴,还可根据资格获得其他津贴和报销。

文告称,国会议员出席国会会议,每天可获400令吉津贴;出席公账会或特别遴选委员会会议,在非国会会议期间,一天津贴300令吉,国会会议期间则是一天250令吉。以及出席官方汇报会一天300令吉。

因公务到32公里以外地区,每天可获100令吉生活津贴支出。

另外,国会议员在出国公务,也可以申报膳食津贴、交通报销、住宿报销、生活津贴和汇率差额报销等福利。其中,膳食津贴一晚340令吉;生活津贴一天170令吉。

文告称,若将所有津贴和报销相加,一名国会议员的月收入往往可达3万至4万令吉,这与首相拿督斯里安华先前提到的一致。

首相早前指出,如果国会议员面对债务,那肯定是本身的理财问题。

他昨天出席活动时才再次指出,所有国会议员包括反对党议员,每月收入可达4万令吉,当中包括约2万5700令吉的固定津贴及其他津贴如会议津贴、国会委员会会议津贴及出差津贴。

“很多反对党议员说生活多艰难,试问你们之间有多少人月入4万?”

【 有诗为评;
 月入4万 还喊穷 ,
贪心不足蛇吞象 ;
心中无民 只为己 ,
此等歪屁 留何用 ? 】

Tuesday, 4 March 2025

 

实事&真相

张庆信:卫长高度关注 》》巫医师短缺将获解决

 

不好意思,问诗巫3位联邦部长们为什么允许联邦卫生部无限拖延到这么危急要崩溃的水平,才获得卫长高度关注?

 

得罪了,YB张,你大人在所谓的“国会”三番两次诉求联邦政府拨款改善提升诗巫医院。可是,他们都把你大人的话当着耳边风, 你怎么也没辙呢?结果和成果,所以不知在哪儿?

 

今天,诗巫医院的状况跟YB林财耀和YB刘强燕已经做三届的砂联邦议员无能无脑无用脱不了关系。

 

YB张吗?是Bintulu联邦议员,砂DUS议员,很多诗巫人都很看好他。做砂DUS都东区议员也有三年了。在这危急和危机时刻站出来要求联邦卫生部长来,他不忘提醒大家是他的功劳能邀请来这么“尊贵“卫生部长亲临来咱们诗巫医院和各别诊所视察。恶心!

 

心理有病才会有这么设想和想像假像敌。不难猜他心中最大的敌人是谁:人联党或脱马党?

 

多少领袖和人民已经对联邦政府每年在砂拉越从各种税收掠夺至少RM3,000亿后,对于砂邦各种基本设施不足要求足够拨款,一直拖延。

 

每次,看到,政客们要求平民百姓捐赠和捐助医疗设备和仪器,我真的感到很不屑。这次到处水灾,多少无能的政客们还是向老百姓要求捐助。

 

就诗巫医院严缺的器材,YB张,像以往,一贯作风,请求人民捐款。看,他又打人民的主意“寻求私企合作买器材“。医疗的大事绝对是联邦政府的大事,他无法向联邦卫生部要求更大的数的拨款。所以,来这一招。同胞们,别再被骗了。                                                       

对不负责任的联邦拨那一点点小款R910万,何必如此感恩不尽?这些拨款,还不是每年向砂拉越刮走RM3,000亿中的小鼻屎。还要替他们怠慢不良的行为擦屁股。

 

对不起,这是够贱的,所以, 联邦马来亚官爷们才敢如此野蛮傲慢对待咱们和大胆违反联合国规章殖民砂拉越。就是咱们这些砂政客养出来的。这是我长久下来的观察,觉察和洞察的结论。

 

自己不断的捞政治成本,深怕他人,尤其是人联党邀功,威胁到他的官途和在人们心目中的地位。谁心中有鬼?所以总是见鬼!

5//25

Saturday, 22 February 2025

An open Letter to Premier AbangJo

*An Open Letter to Premier Abang Zohari and the Sarawak GPS Government: A Betrayal of Trust, A Failure of Leadership*  

Dear Premier Abang Zohari Openg and the Sarawak GPS State Government,  

Trust you are keeping well and safe.

We, the people of Sarawak, write to you not with malice, but with profound disappointment and anger. 

For decades, Sarawakians have been fed promises of *"restoring, defending, and protecting Sarawak’s rights"* under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). 

Yet, the recent capitulation to Putrajaya over the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA74) and the ownership of Sarawak’s oil and gas resources reveals a truth we can no longer ignore: *your words ring hollow, and your actions betray Sarawak*.  

*Broken Promises, Broken Trust*  
You pledged to continue the legacy of the late Chief Minister Adenan Satem (“Tok Nan”), who declared that *"Sarawak’s relationship with the Federal Government must be “constitutionally correct.”* 

Tok Nan’s defiance against federal overreach inspired hope that Sarawak would finally reclaim what is rightfully ours under MA63: *autonomy over our resources*.  

Yet, today, we witness the opposite. 

By conceding to Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim’s assertion that PDA74 remains unchallenged and “business as usual,” you have surrendered Sarawak’s constitutional leverage. 

Law Minister Azalina Othman’s revelation—that Sarawak *“acknowledged and recognized”* PDA74 during closed-door talks—confirms this betrayal. 

How can you reconcile this with your own legal advisors’ stance that PDA74 was enacted *“in secrecy,”* *“unconstitutionally,”* and in violation of MA63?  

*The Petros Mirage: A Symbol of Surrender* 
The creation of Petros was hailed as a breakthrough, a vehicle for Sarawak to reclaim control of its oil and gas. 

Instead, it has become a fig leaf, masking Sarawak’s subservience to Petronas. 

*PM Anwar’s statement—that Petros is merely a “gas aggregator” (excluding LNG, Sarawak’s most lucrative resource)—exposes the grim reality: Sarawak remains a spectator rather than a gladiator in its own house*.  

*You claim PDA74 and the Sarawak Oil Mining Ordinance 1958 (OMO58) can “co-exist,” but this legal ambiguity serves only Petronas and Kuala Lumpur.*

*By refusing to pursue a definitive judicial resolution or parliamentary repeal of PDA74, you have chosen political convenience over constitutional justice*.  

*NATO Leadership: No Action, Talk Only*  
Your partners/colleagues' defense—that opposition figures like Chong Chieng Jen “did nothing”—is a red herring. 

Sarawakians entrusted *you* with an overwhelming mandate. GPS dominates the state assembly and holds pivotal federal influence. Yet, when leverage mattered most, you folded.  

Worse, you dismissed critics as “politicizing the issue,” while offering no substantive rebuttal to Azalina’s damning admission. 

If PDA74 is unconstitutional, why not challenge it in court? 

If MA63 guarantees our resource rights, why concede ownership to Petronas? 

*Silence is complicity.*  

*A Legacy of Failure*  
Tok Nan warned: *“Do not underestimate the people’s intelligence.”* 

Sarawakians are not fools. We see through the theatrics. 

The late Chief Minister fought to delist Sarawak as a “state” in federal documents, asserting our equal partnership. Today, you have reduced Sarawak to a supplicant, begging for crumbs from Petronas’ table.  

Your predecessors traded Sarawak’s resources for “thirty pieces of silver.” You, however, have done worse: *legitimizing theft by validating PDA74*. This is not leadership—it is submission.  

*Our Demands: Action, Not Apologies* 
Sarawakians do not seek hollow slogans or blame games. We demand:  
1. *Immediate legal action* to challenge PDA74’s constitutionality in court, as your own legal advisors insist it violates MA63.  
2. *Parliamentary motion* to repeal or amend PDA74, leveraging GPS’s influence in the unity government.  
3. *Transparency* in all negotiations with Putrajaya—no more secret deals that sell out Sarawak.  

Premier Abang Zohari, you once vowed that GPS would *“fight to the death”* for Sarawak’s rights. Today, your words are ashes. If you will not act, please graciously step aside for leaders who will.  

*Sarawak’s oil and gas belong to Sarawakians. This is non-negotiable.* 

*We will not forget the betrayals of Fairland Sarawak*  
 
*Fairland Sarawak*  
*On behalf of Sarawakians Who Believe in Justice as 'an equal founding partner in the establishment of the Federation of Malaysia'.*

*If not now, when ?*
*If not us Sarawakians, who else ?*

*WE ❤️ SARAWAK !!!*
*Jaga Sarawak bait-bait*

*Anak-Anak Sarawak*
*LAK-SA63*
*21/2/2025*

*Note: This letter is a collective expression of frustration from Sarawakians who expected their leaders to prioritize the state’s constitutional rights over political expediency.* 

*The fight for MA63 is not partisan—it is existential.*
In our political arena 🐍are everywhere.