Pages

Powered By Blogger

Tuesday, 4 November 2025

Bintang Borneo

Bintang Borneo
Tuesday, November 4, 2025

 *Open Letter by Datuk Dr. Jeffrey G. Kitingan* – 4 March 1991 (English Translation)

This letter was published in several local newspapers on 4 March 1991 as Datuk Seri Panglima Dr. Jeffrey G. Kitingan’s response to personal attacks made by Tun Dr. Mahathir Mohamad during his visits to Sabah.

The open letter was issued at a time when the Internal Security Act (ISA) was still in force in Malaysia.
A few months later, on 13 May 1991, Dr. Jeffrey G. Kitingan was detained under the ISA and imprisoned for two years and seven months at the Kamunting Detention Centre.
This letter is being republished for the awareness of the younger generation — to help them understand the unwavering struggle and conviction of Dr. Jeffrey G. Kitingan, a cause he has steadfastly carried for more than 33 years.

This struggle is not over — and it must continue.

_________________

Date: 4 March 1991

Dear friends and beloved people of Sabah,

You may have already heard or read Mahathir’s uncensored speech that appeared in the newspapers on 21 February 1991. I have only recently become aware of it myself.

Mahathir’s statement that Sabah is his colony is not surprising. He himself had brought UMNO into Sabah precisely to ensure total control over the people of this state.

He refuses to respect the leaders whom we, the people of Sabah, have chosen.
He wants to appoint his own leaders, and to dictate the course they should follow.
He believes that Sabah is under his dominion, and that he can do whatever he pleases with us.

He also believes that no one can stop him — not even other leaders from Kuala Lumpur — and they too threaten us through the army, the police, and the Anti-Corruption Agency (BPR).
The true purpose of Kuala Lumpur is now plain for all to see.

Mahathir’s real intention is to abolish the 20-Point Agreement, which formed the fundamental basis of Sabah’s consent to join the Federation of Malaysia.
This plan was deliberately designed to reduce Sabah’s status from that of an equal partner to that of a colony of the Federation of Malaya.

The statement once made by former Indonesian President Sukarno was correct when he warned, during the formation of Malaysia, that Sabah’s colonial status would not change under Malaysia.

He said that what would change was merely the office of the colonial master — from London to Kuala Lumpur.

The events and actions of Kuala Lumpur since 1963 have proven that Sukarno’s words were true.
The people of Sabah were hurried and misled by our leaders into forming the Federation of Malaysia.

Read all the books and documents concerning the formation of Malaysia, and the events that followed, and you will come to understand the truth.

The 20-Point Agreement
Our leaders, though reluctant, ultimately agreed to join the new Federation — but only on certain guarantees.
After a series of discussions, Sabah’s leaders — including Tun Mustapha, Donald Stephens (Tun Fuad Stephens), and Khoo Siak Chew, along with representatives from the Federation of Malaya and the British Government — reached an understanding known as the 20-Point Agreement.

These conditions were extremely important, because they meant that Sabah agreed to form Malaysia only on the terms outlined in those 20 Points.
This was the purpose and understanding reached by all parties at the time.
We all supported it wholeheartedly.

The Betrayal of That Promise
However, everything has changed.
Once our attention turned toward politics, social affairs, and economic development, many of our former leaders became self-serving — more concerned with their own status and interests, and less about what was happening to the state as a whole.

When these leaders became intoxicated with power, wealth, and development, the leaders in Kuala Lumpur seized the opportunity to change Sabah’s status —
from that of an independent nation federated with Malaya and Sarawak (and originally, Singapore) —
to what we are experiencing now: a colony once more.

Worse still, in the process, Kuala Lumpur’s leaders also made the people of Sabah surrender their oil, land, and forest rights — all done quietly and systematically, so that the people of Sabah would not realize what was happening.

I was one of those who saw these things taking place, and I understood clearly where we were being led.
Regardless of what may happen to me or to my family, I cannot ignore it.

As someone privileged — in position, education, and status — I felt it was my duty as a Malaysian citizen and a true Sabahan to correct these wrongs, to raise the issue of the 20 Points, and to expose Kuala Lumpur’s injustices toward Sabah, especially since 1985.

Why the Federal Government Targets Me
I believe you already know much of this.
Now you understand why the Federal Government never stops harassing me and the PBS leadership.
Now you also understand what the Anti-Corruption Agency (BPR) has been after me for.

Kuala Lumpur knows — Mahathir knows — that I am right.
They prefer to eliminate leaders and thinkers like me who question their actions rather than admit the truth about what they have done.

They — Mahathir and some (not all) of the leaders in Kuala Lumpur — can easily destroy me and anyone who agrees with me, because they possess all the instruments of power:
the police, the army, the BPR, the Inland Revenue Department, the Official Secrets Act, and others.

Tell me — is it wrong for me to fight for my state and my people?

The Questions I Ask
Is it wrong for me to question Kuala Lumpur?
Should I not demand a fairer share of oil royalties for this state?
Is it wrong for me to fight to free Sabah from colonial domination?
Is it wrong for me to educate Sabahans about the true facts of our country and our condition?

Is it wrong for me to introduce new and revolutionary ideas for development, poverty reduction, and employment —
to restore dignity and self-worth to our people?

If that is wrong, then we are all guilty — guilty for standing on the side of truth.

It would have been much easier for me not to get involved in the affairs of the people, the state, or the nation.

Some may ask: “Why must you care about all this?”
Indeed, if I cared only for myself and my family, if I were selfish, it would have been better not to get involved at all.

I could have maintained my position comfortably, enjoyed my high salary, and laughed off whatever was happening.
If I had chosen to please the federal leaders and bribe enforcement officials and others, I would have been protected — nothing would have happened to me.

Is that what you wish to see from me? I believe not.
Someone must make a sacrifice.
But such a sacrifice will be meaningless without your support and encouragement.

All of you are the only power capable of stopping Mahathir and freeing us once again from the chains of domination.

On Mahathir’s Misrepresentation
If reviving the 20-Point Agreement and questioning Kuala Lumpur’s actions toward Sabah are interpreted by Mahathir as incitement — an attempt to make Sabahans hate the people of Peninsular Malaysia — then Mahathir must either be a fool or a liar.

I have many friends in Peninsular Malaysia who know me well, who know who I am.
I even have relatives married to Peninsular Malaysians.
I promote goodwill, not hatred.

It is Mahathir himself who has introduced and invited hatred.
He has insulted the leaders elected by the people of Sabah and deliberately deceived the Malaysian public — especially through lies about race and religion.

My Meeting with Mahathir
Do you remember the “sigar” (headgear) incident involving Tengku Razaleigh?
When I met Dr Mahathir in May 1990, I discussed with him several issues.
I told him that I did not come to raise personal matters but to talk about Federal–State relations.

One piece of “advice” he gave me concerning the 20 Points was as follows:

“Jeffrey, the villagers don’t know about Sabah’s rights and the 20 Points — so why should we tell them?
Reports from the Special Branch say that you and IDS are responsible for informing the people...”

For a moment I could hardly believe what I heard — that the Prime Minister of the country was telling me to deceive the very people we are supposed to educate.

When I asked Mahathir to increase Sabah’s share of oil royalties, he replied:

“You’re lucky the Federal Government gives you five percent.
Remember, there was no oil in Sabah before Malaysia existed.”

What Mahathir meant was that this state has no right to its oil and natural resources — that it was not God who gave us our oil, but Malaysia.

On Land and Federal Control
Regarding land matters, Dr Mahathir said it was difficult for the state government to refuse or delay federal agencies when they needed land.
He said that land should be controlled by the Federation.

This reveals Mahathir’s long-term objective — to control Sabah’s land and forests, which are still under state authority as guaranteed by the 20 Points.
His other goal is to turn Sabah into a colony or a component of the Federation of Malaya.

He said:

“...State rights are only temporary. Sabah should be just like Kedah or Perlis.”

This clearly contradicts what the late Tunku Abdul Rahman said during the formation of Malaysia:

“Sabah and Sarawak will not become the 13th and 14th states of the Federation of Malaya,
because they are not joining as equal partners to Malaya but as separate entities with equal status and powers.”

On the Malaysia Agreement
When Malaysia was formed in September 1963, a treaty known as the Malaysia Agreement was signed between the Federation of Malaya, Singapore, Sabah, and Sarawak, binding all parties to its terms.

Those terms constituted a partnership — and if any partner were to withdraw, it would affect the validity of the agreement for the others, requiring a review or a new treaty among those remaining.

When Singapore left the Federation in 1965, it should have invalidated the Malaysia Agreement, which formed the legal foundation of Malaysia.

To me, unless Malaya, Sabah, and Sarawak had jointly reviewed and reaffirmed or renegotiated the Malaysia Agreement after Singapore’s departure,
the legal basis for the Federation of Malaysia ceased to exist.

Why did we not do this?
Why were they afraid to discuss it?
Instead, the federal leaders — especially Mahathir — resorted to threats and arrests to silence us.

A State of Political Persecution
This is the problem we face today.
That is why I am deeply disturbed and shocked by such unfair actions,
where the Prime Minister of our country can make wild and baseless accusations against me, the IDS, and the PBS State Government — a government democratically elected by the people of Sabah.

Based on statements made by Mahathir and other UMNO leaders during their visit to Kota Kinabalu last week,
it is clear to the people of Sabah — and to the world — that in Malaysia, power equals truth.

The Prime Minister and national leaders came to Sabah to display their power and strength.
They came to show that they control the Federal Government, the police, and the military,
and that there are people in Sabah willing to sacrifice their own state’s interests to carry out UMNO’s agenda.

These leaders willingly turn a blind eye to the legitimate rights of the Sabah State Government under PBS —
a government that should be allowed to govern peacefully without interference.


This is a sad day for the people of Sabah, for Malaysia, and for future generations.

Now I can fully understand—and sympathize with—those who attended the USNO assembly, many of whom could not hold back their tears.
They share our love for this land and wish to preserve our basic rights.

They were truly disappointed to see Sabah’s own leaders ready to surrender the state’s political power to Mahathir.

Mahathir has levelled serious accusations against me.
He claimed that I was involved in a plot to take Sabah out of Malaysia, and that I harboured ambitions to become the President of an independent Sabah.

These allegations were made simply to win loud applause from USNO delegates and observers.

What has happened to my rights as a Malaysian citizen?
Who gave the Prime Minister the right to persecute a Malaysian publicly, on television, and through the mass media to the entire world?

Is the Prime Minister above the law?
Is Malaysian law meant only to be used against the Kitingan family, PBS leaders, state officials, and anyone who refuses to obey Barisan Nasional?

To me, such behaviour is vile and shameful, and has no place in a country that claims to uphold democracy.

I have already consulted my lawyers about what legal action can be taken against the Prime Minister and others who have insulted and accused me.

If I were truly involved in what he accuses me of, the Prime Minister should have used legal authority to arrest me and charge me in court.
Why, instead, does he make dramatic political statements?

If this were a matter of national security, it should be handled accordingly.
Why raise it only during USNO’s congress?

And yet he still claims that these actions have nothing to do with politics.
This is hypocrisy.

Why is Jeffrey Kitingan punished by Mahathir every time USNO holds a gathering?
To me, this is political persecution of the worst kind.

On Federal Intimidation
We in Malaysia are not blind.
People can now see clearly that the PBS Government is under siege by the Federal power through
UMNO politics, physical threats (military build-up), ISA detentions, BPR probes,
and actions by the Inland Revenue Department—
until there are those who simply obey every federal demand without question.

Is this the environment Sabah’s leaders agreed to when they helped form Malaysia in 1963?

No! Absolutely not.
We did not agree to be belittled like this, and we did not agree to be colonized by Kuala Lumpur or anyone else.

I call upon the State Government under PBS, which bears the responsibility to defend Sabahans’ rights,
to seriously question Sabah’s position in Malaysia through proper legal channels with the Federal Government.

What is the point of being a State Government when its Chief Minister and leaders are sidelined and not even invited to welcome the Prime Minister’s arrival in Sabah?

Who, then, is really promoting anti-Malaysia sentiment?
Who is truly involved in anti-Malaysia actions?

It is the Prime Minister and the UMNO leaders who are doing so.

On Standing Firm
I will not bow to the Federal threats and conspiracies against me and Sabah’s interests.
I will stand firm by what I have said—
on the 20 Points, on our state rights, and on the need for justice and fairness from the Federal Government toward Sabah,
as I have stated in my previous declarations.

To all the people of Sabah:

Do not lose hope, never give up,
for God will help those who fight for freedom and justice.

To the civil servants, and to my staff in Yayasan Sabah (YS), IDS, and ICSB —
continue your work calmly, efficiently, and with dedication.
Perform your duties wholeheartedly and responsibly.

My mission is to see us live in peace, free from oppression, pressure, and injustice.
Your mission is to free our people from poverty and suffering.
Let us together build an economically progressive state,
so that we may all become instruments of God, serving and loving one another.

To the Youth and Students
To the students, I urge you to devote your full attention to your studies,
for you are the leaders of the next generation.

Use your time and mind to seek and understand the truth about our history and development.

Do not be confined only to what you are taught in school or college,
for that is only one side of the story.

Continue to search for the truth.
Understand what life, freedom, and justice truly mean.


Read the 20 Points, the Sabah Commemorative Book – Sabah 25 Years Later, and other writings.
Do not make conclusions until you know the truth.
Once you know the truth, you will know what to do.

To Parents and Families
To all parents, you are the captains navigating stormy seas.
Guide your children toward truth and the right path in life.
Tell them what has happened to our country so that they may shape a brighter future.

Discipline must be nurtured — but beyond that, we must instil in our children the right attitude,
for they always learn by watching their parents.

To husbands, respect and care for your wives.
A wife is part of yourself — a companion and partner.
She knows many things and can help you distinguish between what is true and false,
between good and bad decisions.
Do not neglect your wife.

To wives, love and care for your husbands.
He is your partner, friend, and adviser — and your mirror when you make mistakes.
But your husband also needs your guidance to find truth and understand our situation in Sabah.

To the People of Peninsular Malaysia
To our brothers and sisters in Peninsular Malaysia,
you are our fellow Malaysians.

We need you to understand our situation in Sabah.
We do not hate you, as your leaders have told you.

It is your leaders who have sown seeds of hatred between us
for their own political gain.

We, the people of Sabah, are oppressed, disturbed, and treated unfairly.
We are colonised and controlled until we have lost our democratic freedom and dignity.

We were told that we achieved independence in 1963 —
but today, we no longer have power over our own political future.
It is the leaders from Peninsular Malaysia who have done this to us.

You need not pity our struggle — but please, try to understand us and our circumstances.
Only then can you contribute meaningfully to us.
And only then will you realise how Kuala Lumpur’s leaders have deceived even the people of Peninsular Malaysia themselves.

To Businesspeople and Investors
To the businessmen and investors — you are the ones who keep the economy moving,
and through your work, you help feed our families.

Do not stop your investments.
Help our economy grow so that our homeland may prosper and become fertile ground for more opportunities.
Support the struggle of the people of Sabah —
because if the people of Sabah succeed, you too will succeed.

To the Political Leaders of Sabah
To the political leaders of Sabah,
you are the true leaders of our people.
Lead them to their destiny.

Fight for their freedom and justice.
Free this homeland from injustice.

Hold firmly to your principles.
Do not be easily tempted to abandon your struggle for the sake of a few ringgit.
Do not oppress the people for personal gain, wealth, or position,
or just to avoid the wrath of your enemies.

Learn to distinguish between personal interests and the interests of the people.

We will all die one day, and all our actions will be recorded in history.
How much wealth or rank can you take with you to the grave?
Will your children be proud of you?

Ask yourself:

“What is my mission? What am I fighting for?
Is it merely to gain position and power —
or to free this homeland from oppression and injustice,
so that we can live in peace and determine our own future?
Am I fighting for myself, or for my people?”

You are leaders.
Do not sell out your land and your people.
If you are confused, take a moment to be still, to reflect and pray —
and God will guide you to the right path.

Do not be ashamed to correct your mistakes.
It is not too late.
Remember — we are all human.

As leaders, your followers seek guidance, information, and advice.
They place their hope in you and expect you to be strong.

Once you know what must be done, do not look back —
for if you do, you are no longer a leader.

If Kuala Lumpur controls our lives, our policies, and our resources,
then life in Sabah will never be the same again.

So my message to you is this:

Unite, stand shoulder to shoulder, and lead as you were elected to lead.
This is your homeland, and politics is in your blood.

To the Leaders in Kuala Lumpur
To other leaders in Kuala Lumpur —
some of you understand us.

You know that some 

Monday, 3 November 2025

The Malaysia-US deal is not OUR DEAL

Title: “THE MALAYA–US DEAL IS NOT OUR DEAL”

Listen, anak-anak tanah Borneo. Tonight we speak clearly, with no apology.

KL just signed a deal with Washington and called it “Reciprocal Trade.” Sinar Harian calls it “Musuh dalam selimut.” The elites call it “strategic.” We call it what it is:

➡️ It is Malaya selling the whole federation to America — without Sabah and Sarawak at the table.
➡️ It is the blueprint to turn Borneo into a permanent resource colony.
➡️ It is a direct threat to our right to self-government.

Let me break it down in language that even the Putrajaya comprador class can understand.

🧷 POINT 1 — “FOLLOW AMERICA OR BE PUNISHED.”
The agreement lets the United States control who Malaysia is allowed to trade with. If Malaysia signs deals with a country that America doesn’t like, America can cancel the pact and punish Malaysia with tariffs again.
That’s Article 5.3.

They also force Malaysia to “mirror” US sanctions. That’s Article 5.1.

Translation for kampung level:

> If Washington says, “Don’t trade with China,” KL must say, “Yes boss.”
> If Washington says, “Block this tech company,” KL must say, “Yes boss.”

Question: Who elected Washington to decide our future? Nobody.

But here’s the next question:
When KL surrenders like this — did Sabah and Sarawak consent?
Answer: NEVER.
So why should we be bound by chains we did not fasten?

This is why Borneo Third Force says: Sabah and Sarawak are NOT obligated to follow a colonial agreement signed without our mandate.

🧷 POINT 2 — “PETRONAS NOW BELONGS TO THEM, NOT US.”
The deal forces Petronas to buy billions in US gas every year. That means our national oil company becomes a guaranteed customer of American exporters.

Before this deal: Petronas could buy gas from whoever gives best price.
After this deal: Petronas MUST feed American suppliers.

That kills sovereignty. That kills bargaining power. And who suffers first?
Sabah and Sarawak.

Why? Because our oil, our gas, our offshore blocks —already sucked for half a century — were supposed to be our leverage to demand back our MA63 rights and 40% revenue.

But if Petronas is now structurally tied to a US supply obligation, Sabah’s oil becomes just “federal collateral.”
Federal treats our resources as bargaining chips in THEIR foreign alignment.

Understand this well:
➡️ When Putrajaya bends the knee, Sabah and Sarawak lose the only weapon left — our control over resource politics.
➡️ This is economic annexation through contract.

🧷 POINT 3 — “NO MORE PROTECTION FOR OUR PEOPLE, ONLY PROTECTION FOR THEIR CORPORATIONS.”
This pact tells Malaysia we cannot “discriminate” against US goods. We must open our market to their agriculture, vehicles, and products cheaply. We must not subsidize our own state-owned companies in a way that “hurts” them.

So what happens?

• Our farmers in Tenom and Beaufort now compete with subsidised agribusiness from a superpower.
• Our small fisheries in Semporna, Kota Belud, Bintulu now face American seafood imports with no SST tax.
• Our village entrepreneurs, our cooperatives, our state GLCs — no special support, no shield — because that would be “unfair” to America.

Tell me:
Is that “free market”?
Or is that textbook neoliberal colonization?

You already know the ans

🧷 POINT 4 — “CULTURE ALSO BEING COLONISED.”
The agreement even forces Malaysian broadcasters to DROP the 80% local content rule on TV and allow US content in prime time.

You think that’s small? That’s not small.

That means:

* Less Sabahan, Sarawakian language on air.
* Less indigenous storytelling.
* Less local drama.
* More imported narrative, imported values, imported brainwashing.

They don’t just want to take your oil.
They want to rewrite your mind.

When they control the land AND the story — that is full-spectrum domination.

🧷 POINT 5 — “THIS IS NOT JUST MALAYA’S SURRENDER. THIS IS MALAYA OFFERING BORNEO AS TRIBUTE.”
This part is critical, Borneo listen carefully.

The federal government went to America and said:
“We will align our economy with yours. We will align our foreign policy with yours. We will align our digital infrastructure with yours. We will buy your gas. We will open our markets. We will weaken our own institutions. We will quiet our broadcasters. Just give us tariff favours.”

In other words:
They sold national sovereignty cheap.

But here is the deeper treason:
They offered Sabah and Sarawak as 'payment'.

Because who holds the oil? Borneo.
Who sits on rare earths? Borneo.
Who has deepwater gas fields, timber, biodiverse biopharma potential, deep-sea fibre routes?
BORNEO.

So when KL kneels, they kneel using OUR spine.

When they surrender, they surrender OUR bargaining position.

When they sign, they sign AWAY OUR FUTURE.

You see it now.

🧷 POINT 6 — “SO WHAT NOW? DO WE JUST SHOUT ON FACEBOOK?”
No. We act.

Borneo Third Force lays down TWO immediate lines for Sabah and Sarawak:

1. We invoke MA63 as a living shield, not museum glass.
   Sabah and Sarawak must declare — in policy, not poetry — that any external economic alignment signed by Putrajaya which touches (a) state resources, (b) state trade access, (c) state cultural control, (d) communications infrastructure within our borders,
   CANNOT APPLY in Sabah/Sarawak territory without explicit ratification by the State Legislative Assembly.
   If KL can say “national interest,” we can say “state survival.” That’s how a federation actually works.

   This is not illegal. This is federalism in its raw form.

2. We build our own Borneo-led economic axis.
   Sabah and Sarawak must accelerate direct subnational diplomacy and trade cooperation with Nusantara (Kalimantan new capital region), Brunei, Southern Philippines, and regional South-South partners.
   Food, energy, fibre, digital, logistics.
   We are not a peninsula appendage. We are the heart of the East Indies trade corridor.
   Stop thinking like a periphery. We ARE the prize.

This is what self-government looks like in practice:
Not shouting “Merdeka!” alone —
but refusing to let foreign clauses walk into our ports.

🧷 POINT 7 — “MESSAGE TO GEN Z, RURAL PEOPLE, AND PETTY BOURGEOISIE IN BORNEO.”
This is the part KL hopes you don’t understand.

They think the kampung people won’t read the fine print.
They think the youth only care about TikTok, not sovereignty.
They think the small business owners are too busy surviving to notice structural conquest.

We are telling you now:
→ These clauses, if allowed to stand, will kill your local contract work.
→ They will drown your local brands under foreign imports.
→ They will erase your dialect from broadcast.
→ They will make Sabah and Sarawak legally invisible in decisions that decide war, trade, and energy.

And when Sabah and Sarawak are invisible in law, we become disposable in reality.

That is how you erase a people without firing a bullet.

🧷 POINT 8 — “THE ENEMY IS INSIDE THE BLANKET.”
Sinar Harian asked: “Musuh dalam selimut?”
Answer: Yes.
The foreign hand holds the pen.
But the one signing is wearing our flag.

We are not just dealing with American imperialism.
We are dealing with Malayan compradors — smiling middlemen who trade our birthright for their own career.

That is why we name this clearly:
Hajiji’s comprador politics in Sabah.
PH federalism under Anwar that obeys external hegemony.
Zafrul’s obedience to capital, not rakyat.

We are done being polite about it.

🧷 POINT 9 — THE BORNEO THIRD FORCE POSITION
We do not accept:
– A federation that uses us as collateral.
– A trade pact that chains our future to a foreign superpower.
– A leadership that signs away our resource leverage without even consulting our land.

We assert:
– Sabah has the right to govern Sabah.
– Sarawak has the right to govern Sarawak.
– The people of Borneo have the right to decide who we trade with, what we tax, what we protect, and what we broadcast to our children.

That is not extremism.
That is what self-government means.

🧷 POINT 10 — THE CLOSING WAR CRY
From Pitas to Lawas, from Keningau to Kapit, from Kudat to Mukah — listen:

We are not anti-Malaysia.
We are anti-colonial.
We are anti-comprador.
We are anti-selling-Borneo-without-Borneo’s-permission.

We don’t bow to Washington.
We don’t bow to Putrajaya.
We bow only to the land, to Aki Nabalu, to the rivers that feed us, to the ancestors who bled so we can still stand here tonight.

Say it with me:

Borneo is not for sale.
Sabah decides Sabah.
Sarawak decides Sarawak.
This is our land.
This is our future.
This is our turn.

🔥 BORNEO THIRD FORCE 🥉
Reclaim the Land. Reclaim the Future. Reclaim Borneo.

Forwarded from: 
🔥 BORNEO THIRD FORCE 🥉 STATEMENT TO THE PEOPLE OF SABAH & SARAWAK GROUP 🔥

Friday, 3 October 2025

Reject Malayan parties

Suggest giving points on why we need to reject the Malayan parties:

*WHY REJECT MALAYAN PARTIES FROM CONTESTING IN SABAH & SARAWAK*

*Malayan parties contesting here is not democracy — it’s subtle takeover.* 

 *1. Protect the MA63 compact’s seat-allocation safeguard*
* The MA63 negotiations implicitly envisaged protections against Malayan dominance by granting Sabah & Sarawak dedicated representation.
* Allowing Malayan parties to contest undermines that protective design — it dilutes the seat-allocation intent and opens the door to overwhelming by Malayan votes.
* If that seat-allocation right is still legally alive, then Malayan parties have no right to invade those slots.

*2. Prevent federal takeover of internal affairs & resources*
* If Malayan parties win seats locally, they gain leverage to influence or usurp local policy, budget, resource management and appointments.
* This paves the path for centralisation and creeping control from Kuala Lumpur into what ought to be local jurisdiction.
* In effect, we surrender political autonomy and resource sovereignty.

*3. Safeguard local identity and priorities*
* Sabah and Sarawak have distinct ethnic, cultural, geographic and economic conditions. Local parties are more responsive to local needs.
* Malayan parties often impose Peninsular agendas not suited to Borneo’s realities.
* We must not allow outside parties to drive our direction, especially when they lack deep local accountability.

*4. Maintain checks on constitutional imbalance*
* With Malayan parties contesting and winning seats, they can support federal amendments or laws inimical to MA63 or state rights.
* Even if Sabah & Sarawak had “reserved seats,” Malayan party MPs allied to the center can swell the majority, override protections, or push centralising amendments.
    
*5. Uphold the decolonisation/self-determination rationale*
* The anti-cession struggle and MA63 were ostensibly about ensuring self-rule, not integration into Malaya’s party system.
* If external parties contest us, we revert to a neo-colonial political pattern — where control is exercised via party machines, not local consent.

*6. Violates spirit (and possibly letter) of MA63 and constitutional protection*
* Many activists argue that certain provisions of MA63 entrench state autonomy and limit federal encroachment. Malayan parties intruding is arguably contrary to that entrenchment. 
* Under SSRANZ proposals, expelling the Malayan parties is seen as necessary to defend the MA63 guaranteed (if valid) seat allocation right. (See SSRANZ public statements) (e-pbk.com)
* PBK and other groups have publicly argued that Malayan parties contesting amounts to “poaching” of seats allocated to Sabah & Sarawak. (e-pbk.com)

 *7. Political leverage: Local parties must have priority*
* Rejecting Malayan parties forces constituents to choose local representatives who are more accountable to local interests.
* It strengthens state-based political parties, fosters local leadership, and reduces dependence on KL’s patronage networks.

*8. Defensive move in the face of historical domination*
* Historically, Malayan parties have dominated policy direction, resource extraction, and federal priorities at the expense of Sabah & Sarawak.
* Allowing them further in local contests perpetuates historical injustice and structural imbalance.

*9. Electoral fairness and sovereignty of state elections*
* State-level elections should remain under the jurisdiction of the local people, not be a satellite of national party contests.
* Malayan parties entering local fields distort the playing field — they bring in national funding, networks and influence not available locally.

https://www.dailyexpress.com.my/news/267690/pbk-urges-sabah-sarawak-voters-to-reject-malayan-parties/

Wednesday, 1 October 2025

All this is a continuation of the Ningkan Crisis from 1966

*All this is a continuation of the Ningkan Crisis from 1966.* 

The current struggle over Sarawak’s sovereignty cannot be separated from the Ningkan Crisis of 1966, when Sarawak’s first Chief Minister, Stephen Kalong Ningkan, was unlawfully removed under federal pressure. That episode marked the start of direct Malayan intervention in Sarawak politics. GPS’ political predecessors participated in this ouster, inheriting—rather than resolving—the deeper problem of Malayanisation. Today, those unresolved issues resurface in the fight over Sarawak’s territorial rights.

At the heart of Sarawak’s position is the argument that federal laws seizing control of land and natural resources—the Continental Shelf Act 1966 (CSA), the Petroleum Development Act 1974 (PDA), and later the Territorial Sea Act 2012 (TSA)—were never validly consented to by Sarawak’s Dewan Undangan Negeri (DUN). This violates both the Federal Constitution and the terms of MA63, which required local legislative approval for changes to fundamental rights and territorial arrangements.

This, in turn, reopens the foundational question of Malaysia’s legality. If the formation of Malaysia lacked genuine and informed consent of the people of Sarawak (as required under international law, UNGA Resolutions 1514 & 1541, and reaffirmed by the ICJ in the Chagos case), then the federation’s legal basis is gravely weakened. Malaysia’s claim to be a decolonisation exercise collapses if it is shown to be merely a transfer of sovereignty from Britain to Malaya under a void treaty.

*International law is clear*: in the context of decolonisation, boundaries cannot be redrawn and territories cannot be seized without the free and genuine consent of the people concerned. This principle is also embedded in Malaysia’s own Federal Constitution, Article 3, which recognises the sanctity of territorial integrity in decolonisation.

*The legislative manoeuvres in 2012, where the TSA was rushed through to reassert federal control once emergency powers lapsed, reveal that federal authorities were always conscious of the illegality of their claims. Far from being inadvertent, this was a deliberate policy of consolidation over Sarawak’s land and offshore wealth.*

*Conclusion*
The cumulative effect of the Ningkan ouster, the unilateral federal legislation (CSA 1966, PDA 1974, TSA 2012), and the absence of genuine consent at Malaysia’s formation amounts to a fundamental breach of MA63—if it were ever valid in the first place. These breaches extinguish Malaysia’s legal claim over Sarawak’s sovereignty.

Sarawak, therefore, possesses not only the political but also the legal right to reclaim independence through final decolonisation. The path forward is not the piecemeal restoration of powers under MA63, but the assertion of Sarawak’s right to self-determination under international law, free from Malayan encroachment.

See CT Choo & Chang's well-researched paper, FEDERALISM AND RESTORATION OF SARAWAK’S TERRITORIAL WATERS AND BOUNDARIES.

Saturday, 27 September 2025

Harun's remarks

Press Statement

Art Harun’s Remarks Confirm That MA63 Provided No Safeguards, Strengthening the Case for Sabah’s Independence

The Republic of Sabah North Borneo Government-in-Exile (RSNB-GiE) notes with deep concern the remarks of former Dewan Rakyat Speaker, Tan Sri Azhar Azizan Harun (Art Harun), published in The Borneo Post on 26 September 2025, dismissing the claim that Sabah and Sarawak were entitled to one-third of parliamentary seats under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). While some may view his statement as a denial of Borneo’s political rights, RSNB-GiE views it as a significant admission that reinforces what we have long argued: MA63 never provided genuine safeguards and was never a valid international treaty of equal partnership.

Firstly, Art Harun openly admits that no provision exists in MA63, the Malaysia Act 1963, the Inter-Governmental Committee Report, or the Federal Constitution that guarantees Sabah and Sarawak one-third of the parliamentary seats. This is important, because it confirms that MA63 was never designed to safeguard the political autonomy or equal status of the Borneo territories. Instead, it was a framework engineered by Britain and Malaya to justify the transfer of colonial authority to Malaya, which then rebranded itself as “Malaysia” in 1963.

Secondly, historical records demonstrate that the so-called “formation of Malaysia” was not a formation at all, but an enlargement of the Federation of Malaya. The confidential British Commonwealth Office letter of 15 August 1966, and subsequent documents, clearly confirmed that Malaysia was regarded as nothing more than the continuation of Malaya with new territories and a new name. This proves that Sabah and Sarawak were annexed into an enlarged Malaya rather than joining as equal founding partners. The United Nations and the international community were misled into believing in a new federation, when in truth, there was no new political entity created in 1963.

Thirdly, the Manila Accord of 1963 required that the people of North Borneo (Sabah) and Sarawak must freely decide their future through a proper act of self-determination before Malaysia could be recognised internationally. This requirement was never fulfilled. Instead, Britain and Malaya rushed the process, suppressing international concerns, and a flawed UN mission, whose impartiality has since been questioned by declassified UK diplomatic telegrams, was used to give the appearance of legitimacy. In reality, the process violated the UN Charter, Resolution 1514 (on decolonisation), Resolution 1541 (on association with independent states), and the Statute of Westminster 1931 on treaty-making powers of colonies.

Fourthly, even if one were to accept MA63 as valid, the structural safeguards supposedly promised to Sabah and Sarawak were systematically eroded. The exit of Singapore in 1965 reduced the Borneo bloc’s strength, yet no corrective action was taken to restore the balance. Art Harun’s statement today confirms what RSNB-GiE has consistently argued: there were no enforceable safeguards, not for parliamentary representation, not for autonomy, and not for equality. This exposes the entire arrangement as a colonial deception designed to favour Malaya.

Finally, the current reality speaks for itself: Sabah and Sarawak together hold less than 25% of parliamentary seats. This structural imbalance means that Sabah and Sarawak are permanently at the mercy of Malayan-controlled politics, unable to influence constitutional amendments or defend their interests. The erosion of autonomy, the plunder of resources, demographic manipulation, and the sidelining of our people all stem from this original illegitimacy.

The RSNB-GiE therefore rejects the narrative that Sabah and Sarawak should be satisfied with token debates about seat allocations within Malaya’s Parliament. Our position is clear: we do not seek more seats in Malaya’s Parliament, we seek the restoration of Sabah’s independence and the establishment of our own Parliament in Sabah.

Art Harun’s remarks have inadvertently strengthened our case. By admitting that MA63 never provided binding safeguards, he confirms that Sabah was deceived into an arrangement that failed to uphold the standards of international law and decolonisation. This is why the RSNB-GiE declares MA63 void ab initio and continues to pursue the recognition of Sabah’s independence as a matter of urgent justice and unfinished decolonisation.

Issued by:

Office of the President
Republic of Sabah North Borneo Government-in-Exile (RSNB-GiE)
27 September 2025

Wednesday, 24 September 2025

Dire Warning to Sabahans and Sarawakians

Dire Warning to Sabahans and Sarawakians:
Steer Clear of Project SAMA, ROSE,  
and Their Malayan Puppet Masters
Sabahans and Sarawakians, heed this urgent call: Project SAMA and ROSE are 
not your allies. 

These organizations, cloaked in the deceptive garb of reform and democracy, are nothing but instruments of Malayan domination, orchestrated by 
their puppet master, BERSIH. 

For too long, the people of Sabah and Sarawak have been subjected to the insidious machinations of Malaya, and these groups are the latest weapons in a year-long campaign to keep us as subservient  colonies. 

Their agenda is clear: to deny Sabah and Sarawak the rightful 35% of 
parliamentary seats that would grant us true power and autonomy. Do not be 
fooled by their polished rhetoric or their NGO status. These are wolves in sheep’s 
clothing, and they pose a clear and present danger to the future of our beloved Borneo states. 

The so-called “democracy” these organizations champion is a sham, a carefully crafted illusion designed to perpetuate Malayan colonial rule over Sabah and  Sarawak. 

BERSIH, the mastermind behind Project SAMA and ROSE, has mounted a relentless campaign to undermine the Malaysia Agreement 1963 
(MA63), the very foundation of our rights as equal partners in the federation. Their 
tactics are as cunning as they are treacherous. 

They dangle the promise of “one-
man, one-vote” fairness while simultaneously pushing for Sabah and Sarawak to settle for a measly one-third of the seats in the Dewan Negara, the Senate. 

This is no compromise—it is a deliberate Malayan trick to strip us of real power in the Dewan Rakyat, where true legislative authority lies. By relegating us to a token 
presence in the Senate, they ensure that Malaya retains its iron grip on the federal 
government, leaving Sabah and Sarawak as powerless appendages of a 
Peninsula-centric regime. 

Let us be unequivocal: any organization that does not unequivocally support 
Sabah and Sarawak’s rightful claim to 35% of parliamentary seats is an enemy of our people. 

This is not a matter of negotiation or debate—it is a matter of justice, of honouring the sacred promises made before the formation of Malaysia. 

Project SAMA and ROSE, despite their claims of advocating for fairness, plot to keep us subjugated. 

Their refusal to back 35% representation in Dewan Rakyat exposes their true colours. They are not here to uplift Sabah and Sarawak; they are here to 
ensure we remain colonies, stripped of influence and chained to Malayan 
interests. 

Most disgraceful of all is the role of ROSE, a Kuching-based organization 
that has betrayed its own people. ROSE, led by misguided Sarawakians, has 
become a willing accomplice in BERSIH’s schemes, acting as a comprador for Malayan interests. Their betrayal cuts deep, selling out Sarawak’s future for a 
pat on the back from their Malayan overlords. They received direct funding from Malaya for their work. 

A glaring example of their duplicity occurred on 21 Sept, when 
ROSE organised for Professor Andrew Harding to speak in Kuching. What should have been an opportunity for open dialogue was instead a carefully controlled farce. 

Sarawakian participants were silenced, their questions censored. Simple, 
critical inquiries—such as “Is MA63 valid?” and “Can Sarawak leave the Malaysian federation?”—were blocked 
outright. This is not democracy; this is suppression masquerading as discourse. 

The fact that ROSE and its allies refuse to engage with these fundamental questions reveals their true allegiance: they are agents of Malaya. 

Read: 
https://www.facebook.com/share/p/16Jndmgvxy/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1Fqj7Uz9gb/
https://www.facebook.com/share/v/15bkd2So4Z/

Make no mistake—ROSE is the classic “running dogs” of Malayan colonialism, 
cloaking their treachery in the language of reform and equality. Their talk of “one-
man, one-vote” is a hollow slogan, a distraction from their real goal: to maintain the status quo where Malaya reigns supreme.

 If they were truly committed to the spirit of MA63 and the empowerment of Sabah and Sarawak, they would be fighting tooth and nail for our 35% parliamentary representation. Instead, they offer crumbs in the form of Senate seats, hoping we will be naive enough to accept this insult as progress. 

We are not so easily deceived. They are a clear and present danger to our sovereignty, our identity, and our future. We must reject their influence and rally together to demand what is rightfully ours: 35% of parliamentary seats. 

To every Sabahan and Sarawakian reading this: stand firm, stay vigilant, and do not fall for the honeyed words of these Malayan puppets. Project SAMA and ROSE may operate under the guise of local advocacy, but their loyalty lies 
with BERSIH and the Malayan elite. 

They are not here to liberate us; they are 
here to chain us. Let us unite in defiance of their betrayal and fight for the 
full restoration of our rights under MA63. 

The future of Sabah and Sarawak 
depends on it. We will not be silenced, we will not be sidelined, and we will not be 
colonies any longer. 
Issued by: 
The Real Patriots of Sabah and Sarawak

Monday, 25 August 2025

The mystery of Sabah's state religion

The Mystery of Sabah’s State Religion: A Wake Up Call for Sarawak


📜 The Original Promise: No State Religion

In 1963, Point 1 of the 20 Point Agreement clearly stated: “There should be no state religion in Sabah.” This was a key condition for Sabah joining Malaysia to protect religious freedom and prevent religion from being politicized.


🔧 Silent Constitutional Change: No Referendum, No Coverage

Yet by 1973, Sabah’s constitution was quietly amended to make Islam the official state religion, without any referendum, public debate, or significant media coverage. Sabah lost its secular status in silence.


🤝 Who Benefited? Who Betrayed Sabah?

The masterminds were Sabahan parties aligned with West Malaysian UMNO, who traded Sabah’s secular constitution for political power and funding. Some say this was the start of a cultural conquest.


🧪 Sabah Was the Testbed Sarawak Is the Target

Conspiracy theorists argue: Sabah was just the testing ground; the real prize is Sarawak, where religious freedom is stronger. Today, similar patterns are emerging in Sarawak:
 • Public buildings adopting mosque-like architecture
 • Official events beginning with Islamic prayers
 • Education system increasingly reflecting West Malaysian norms
 • Non-Muslims gradually excluded from core decision-making

Sarawak is retracing Sabah’s steps only decades later.